North Starr Postacute Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 31 beds and averages 26.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents skin assessments were completed to prevent pressure injuries (a wound or sore that develops from prolonged pressure on the skin, usually over a bony prominence such as heels, knees, elbows, hips, shoulders, and tailbone) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1's stage 3 (Full-thickness loss of skin. Dead and black tissue may be visible) pressure injury was identified on 6/3/25, 31 days after being admitted to the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 developing a stage 3 pressure injury, which prolonged his stay in the facility because the facility he was to be discharged to would not accept him with a pressure injury. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to revise Resident 11's comprehensive care plan to address a significant change in condition following hospitalization for suspected infected dialysis access (the site used to connect the resident to dialysis, a treatment that cleaned the blood when the kidneys could not do so), treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics (medicine given through a vein directly into the blood stream to treat infection), and replacement of the dialysis catheter (a flexible tube placed into a large vein to allow dialysis treatments). This failure had the potential to result in the residents' care needs not being identified, communicated and addressed through coordinated interdisciplinary care planning upon the residents' return to the facility. Findings:During an observation on 5/5/26 at 12:02 p.m., Resident 11 was observed in the dining room eating lunch. No issues or concerns were observed at that time. During a review of Resident 11's admission Record (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 3) out of ten residents received a level II Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- evaluation for individuals suspected of having a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or Intellectual/Developmental Disability (I/DD)/Related Condition (RC), triggered by a positive Level I screen, to determine if they need specialized services, ensuring placement in the least restrictive setting) evaluation by the designated entity to determine if SMI, ID/DD/RC conditions were present when Resident 3 had a PASSRR level I screening result positive for SMI and the facility did not ensure a PASRR level II screening was completed.This failure resulted in Resident 3 not receiving a required PASRR level II screening which could result in delayed treatment, identification of care or services.During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/6/26 at 2:48 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 3's Preadmission Screening and Resident Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy (a colorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) professional standards of practice were followed for one (Resident 20) of ten residents when Resident 20 did not have oxygen therapy signage posted.This failure resulted in Resident 20's oxygen concentrator (medical device that helps residents breathe) being on with no oxygen therapy signage posted in or outside her room which could result in fire, hazards or injuries.During an observation on 5/5/26 at 10:01 a.m. in Resident 20's room, Resident 20 was observed lying in bed. Resident 20's oxygen concentrator was observed on at 5 LPM (liter per minute-a unit of measurement for the flow rate of oxygen). Resident 20's nasal cannula (a thin, flexible tube with two prongs that fit into the nostrils and deliver oxygen) was on the floor.During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/5/26 at 10:30 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, in Resident 20's room, Resident 20 was observed lying in bed. Resident 20's oxygen concentrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 4) by failing to ensure an order for monitoring Resident 4's anticoagulant (a medication that helped prevent blood from clotting too easily, which could increase the risk of bleeding) adverse effects (unwanted or harmful side effects from a medication) was in place following readmission to the facility. This failure had the potential to delay identification of signs and symptoms of bleeding, placing Resident 4 at risk for adverse outcomes related to anticoagulant therapy. Findings:During an observation on 5/6/26 at 11:29 a.m. Resident 4 was observed asleep in bed with the bed in the lowest position. No obvious bruising was observed on the face or upper body. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post actual direct care staffing hours worked for public review for 21 of 21 residents in the facility, as required, by posting projected DHPPD (Direct Hours Per Patient Day) staffing information instead of actual hours worked for the prior day.This failure had the potential to prevent residents' family members and visitors from having accurate information regarding the actual nursing staffing levels providing care in the facility. Findings:During an observation on 5/6/26 at 10:05 a.m. in the facility lobby, the publicly posted Daily, Nursing Shift Staffing sheet dated 5/6/26, was reviewed. The document identified Projected DHPPD: 4.2 at the bottom of the posting. During an interview on 5/8/26 at 11:56a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she was responsible for posting the daily DHPPD staffing sheet each day. During a concurrent interview and review of the facility's Daily Nurse Shift Staffing sheet dated 5/6/26 and Appendix PP tag F732, dated 2/3/23, on 5/8/26 at 12:23p.m. with the DON, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, handled, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when the ice machine was not secured and accessible to all residents, visitors, and staff.This failure resulted in the ice machine being improperly accessed and handled by Family Member (FM) 1 resulting in the contamination of ice which could lead to food borne illness for 22 out of 22 residents receiving food from the facility.During an observation on 5/5/26 at 9:19 a.m. the ice machine was observed at the end of the hall, near the kitchen and room [ROOM NUMBER]. The ice machine was observed in a closet with no door. The ice machine was observed with no lock. The ice machine was observed with no signage posted. The ice machine was observed with a designated ice scoop on the right side of the wall.During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/26 at 9:33 a.m. at the ice machine, Family Member (FM) 1 was observed exiting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for one of ten sampled residents (Resident 30) when Resident 30 had a midline catheter (thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm used for intravenous treatments) dressing that was not changed for 8 days and then was not labeled or recorded in the medical record accurately after a dressing change.This failure resulted in Resident 30's midline catheter dressing not being changed per provider orders or facility policy and procedures which had the potential to result in catheter-related infections and illness.During an observation on 5/5/26 at 9:53 a.m. with Resident 30, in Resident 30's room, Resident 30's midline catheter dressing was observed dated 4/27/26. Resident 30's midline catheter dressing indicated it had not been changed in eight days.During a record review on 5/5/26 at 4:00 p.m. Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-09-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure titled Medication Storage in the Facility when the medication room and medication refrigerator temperature which stored drugs and biologicals were not monitored and documented on 9/8/24 and 9/9/24. This failure had the potential for drugs and biologicals stored inside the medication room and medication refrigerator to decrease their effectiveness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 9/10/24, at 11:52 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), inside the medication room, the DON was observed reviewing the temperature log of the medication room and the medication refrigerator. The DON stated the medication room and the medication refrigerator temperature were not documented from 9/8/24 to 9/9/24. The medication room stored over-the-counter medications such as Multivitamins (supplement), Vitamin C (use for wound healing), Vitamin B-12 (use to prevent anemia), Zinc (use for wound healing), Ferrous Gluconate (iron supplement), Ibuprofen (use to relieve pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-13 · tag F0943 — widespread
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure titled Staff Development Program to ensure Licensed Nurses (LNs), Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) and ancillary (additional) support staff received and demonstrated competency to prevent and recognize resident abuse and had the necessary skills and techniques necessary to care for residents who were identified as high risk for fall when: 1. 11 of 28 facility staff had not attended and completed the 2024 annual mandatory in-service training for Abuse Prevention. 2. 16 of 28 facility staff had not attended and completed the 2024 annual mandatory in-service training for Fall Prevention. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for care not being provided in a safe and competent manner. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 9/12/24, at 10:41 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the in-service training titled Abuse Prevention, dated 3/20/24 was reviewed. The DSD stated they have 28 employees providing direct and indirect care to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and sanitary homelike environment for two of five sampled residents (Residents 16 and 22) when the west hall shower room remained accessible for use with missing floor tiles, and the existing floor tiles were black with yellow areas in the tile grout. This failure resulted in an unclean, unsafe, unsanitary and non-homelike environment for Residents 16 and 22. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/12/24 at 9:15 a.m. with Resident 16 in Resident 16's room, Resident 16 was observed dressed, sitting in her wheelchair next to her roommate's bed. Resident 16 complained of the shower in her hallway of being dirty. Resident 16 stated she did not want to use the shower in the west hall. Resident 16 stated she had requested to go to another shower in the next hallway. During a review of Resident 16's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $438K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA