Northvine Postacute Care
446 Arrowood Dr, Santa Rosa, CA 95407 · For profit - Corporation · 62 certified beds · (707) 528-2100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (76) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $36,288 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-28)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.2% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.4% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 18.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.55 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 5% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.7%CMS range 31.3–55.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.3%CMS range 8.2–17.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.22 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 61.7 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.19 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
76 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 62 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2025-04-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for 57 out of 59 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen, when:1. a grease trap (a plumbing device, type of drain, intended to capture fats, oils and grease from wastewater), located in the dishwashing area under the two-compartment sink, was not maintained in good repair and caused wastewater (includes substances such as food scraps, oils, soaps and chemicals) to back-up on to the kitchen floor. This occurred while a County Department of Health Services (CDHS) Inspector was present on 3/18/25.2. did not ensure that the facility identified and resolved the source of the wastewater backup into the kitchen, despite evidence that staff were aware of wastewater coming up from the grease trap and drain under the grease trap prior to the survey. And,3. did not implement code compliance corrective actions, related to the kitchen (the physical environment of dietetic services)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Have a consistent leadership of an Administrator, DON (Director of Nursing), and DSD (Director of Staff Development), which led to the lack of training for the nursing staff for both the Licensed Nurses and the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). These failures had the potential for the nursing staff's inability to provide accurate assessments and safe provisions of care to the residents to ensure residents received high quality of care and effective care was being delivered. 2. To assess and treat Resident 11, who had been complaining of his coccyx/buttocks (lower/backside/behind) region feeling chapped and hurting since 5/30/23, until the surveyor had two CNAs turn Resident 11 on his side, after they finished his care on 6/2/23 at 9:45 a.m. Resident 11 had three open areas, one located on his left coccyx, another on his left lower buttocks region and another open area on his right lower buttocks to thigh region. The surrounding area…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of nursing care when one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents did not have documented weekly skin assessments in their medical chart and wound care treatments were not implemented to Resident 1's right great toe.This failure resulted in the development of infection and maggots in Resident 1's right great toe, which required hospitalization and subsequent amputation to his right great toe. Cross reference F925.A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis of one side of the body), and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A review of a Nursing admission Assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1's skin assessment was documented as Right Toe-Bruising. A review of Resident 1's Right Great Toe Ulcer Care Plan,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-28 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (a condition characterized by paralysis of one side of the body), expressive language disorder (a communication disorder impacting a person's ability to communicate their thoughts), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated 11/1/24, indicated Medical Doctor 1 (MD 1) planned for a wound care consult, currently foam dressing to right dorsal [top of foot] foot ulcer every Monday, Wednesday, Friday. MD 1 noted the wound measurement taken on 10/4/24 was, 1 centimeter [cm-a unit of measure] x 1cm x 0.2cm. A review of the Physician's Progress Notes dated 5/16/25, indicated Resident 1 had an infection in his right great toe and was ordered antibiotics, warm compresses as needed and to cleanse the area with normal saline (a solution of salt and water used in medicine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0826 — isolatedProvide specialized rehabilitative services by qualified personnel, when ordered for a resident by a doctor.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure rehabilitative services were provided for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Physical Therapy (PT) was not provided according to the plan of care and physician orders.This failure had the potential to result in the resident failing to attain her highest practicable level of physical and functional well-being.During an interview with the Administrator on 1/27/26 at 10:10 a.m., the Administrator stated that the facility was transitioning to having in-house rehab staff rather than staff from an outside rehab provider. The facility ended the contract with the outside rehab providers at the start of the year. The Administrator stated he hired one Occupational Therapist (OT) from the outside rehab providers to continue to work for this facility. She became the facilities employee on the day the outside rehab providers contract ended. The Administrator stated that the facility had a Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA), to start work next…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program when flies were observed in common hallways and three resident rooms and four resident rooms had torn window screens.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent vector (an insect or rodent that transmits bacteria and viruses) borne illnesses for a census of 54 residents.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/28/25 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 3 was lying in bed. Upon observation a half full and open urinal and partially eaten personal food items had been placed on Resident 3's bedside table. In addition, a strip of fly paper with 3 dead flies attached and a live fly was seen on Resident 3's curtain Resident 3 stated he had seen flies in his room, all the time. Upon inspection, Resident 3's window screen was torn.During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/28/25 at 10:51 a.m., Resident 4 was sitting on the edge of his bed. Resident 4 stated flies had randomly been entering his room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment when three chairs available for resident use were worn out and tattered in one hallway of the facility.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide a clean and comfortable environment for residents and their guests.During an observation of the facility's Garden Hall on 7/14/25 at 11:36 a.m., three wooden chairs with seats and arm rests made of pleather (a synthetic material made to look and feel like leather) were cracked, flaky, and worn-out which exposed light brown, discolored, and coarse fabric fibers. These chairs were available for residents and guests to use. One chair was removed by a guest and brought into a resident room. Thereafter, a resident sat in one of the other chairs. During a concurrent interview and observation on 7/14/25 at 1:12 p.m. with the Infection Preventionist (IP), the IP confirmed the three chairs in the Garden Hall were all torn with worn-out cushions. The IP stated the chairs were an infection control concern and stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect residents from Resident 1's aggressive behavior when facility staff were not able to verbalize Resident 1's care plan for aggression. This failure resulted in Resident 1 becoming physically aggressive with two residents. Finding: On 5/20/25, the Department received a report from the facility that Resident 1 had hit Resident 2 when their wheelchairs became stuck together while in the hallway. During an observation on 5/27/25 at 9:44 a.m., Resident 1 was in her wheelchair holding a teddy bear and a piece of paper in the room where three male residents resided at the end of a hallway. Immediately outside the door to this room Licensed Nurse A was standing at the treatment cart. Across the hall, a housekeeping cart was in front of the doorway to a resident room. Resident 3, in her wheelchair, approached Licensed Nurse A and asked him to move the housekeeping cart so she could enter her room to use the bathroom. Resident 1 came to the doorway of the room she was in, and Licensed Nurse A asked Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services necessary to maintain good grooming for three residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) of three sampled residents when all three had long, jagged (rough, uneven shape, with some sharp points), and dirty fingernails. This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent skin infections if the residents' scratched their skin with dirty jagged nails. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated admission to the facility on 4/4/25 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and the need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 2 ' s admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and the need for assistance with personal care. A review of Resident 3 ' s admission record indicated admission to the facility on 6/4/24 with diagnoses including generalized muscle weakness and the need for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate and implement resident-centered nursing care plans for one of three sampled residents, when: 1. A nursing care plan was not initiated when Resident 1 developed a urinary tract infection (UTI- when bacteria enter the urinary tract, which includes the kidneys, bladder, and urethra. Most UTIs are caused by bacteria from the bowel); and, 2. Nursing care plan interventions were not implemented when Resident 1 experienced constipation for three days These failures had the potential to worsen or delay improvement of Resident 1's medical conditions. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, printed 4/10/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (hemiplegia is a severe condition involving paralysis on one side of the body, while hemiparesis is a milder form of weakness on one side) of the right dominant side, vascular dementia (a type of dementia caused by impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1) Tuna and chicken salad sandwiches did not reach a safe internal serving temperature, 2) [NAME] and dishwasher were not wearing an apron 3) Absence of a touch free garbage can by hand washing sink, 4) Internal food temperatures were not monitored prior to transporting residents' meals to the facility, 5) Pots and pans were not air dried, 6) Three-compartment sink manual dishwashing process was not done correctly, 7) Temperature monitoring for the walk-in refrigerator, freezer and commissary kitchen (a rentable commercial kitchen), were not completed, and 8) Dietary Aide used the food production two-compartment sink to rinse out a dirty pan. These failure placed, 57 out of 59 residents who received facility prepared foods, at risk for foodborne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods). Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/24/25 at 3:25 p.m., [NAME] K was preparing tuna…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's administration (the person/s responsible for the overall operation and management of a skilled nursing facility, ensuring the facility meets regulations and provides quality care for residents) failed to use their resources effectively and efficiently, when corrective actions were not completed following the issuance of the County's Department of Health Services (CDHS) Site Review Inspection Report in October 2024. This failure resulted in the interruption of food services for 57 out of 59 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen when CDHS suspended the facility's Retail Food Permit which required the facility to cease all food production operations effective 3/18/25 at 10:37 a.m. and to remain in effect until the facility can meet CDHS requirements (cross reference with F908). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/18/25 at 4:34 p.m., with Administrative Staff B (ADM B), Site Review Inspection Report, dated 10/28/24, was reviewed. ADM B confirmed she received the report which indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, when the facility's QAPI program did not address code compliance corrective actions, related to the physical environment of dietetic services, issued to the facility by the County Department of Health Services (CDHS) on 10/28/24. This failure resulted in the interruption of food services for 57 out of 59 residents who received food from the facility's kitchen when CDHS suspended the facility's Retail Food Permit and required the facility to cease all food production operations effective 3/18/25 at 10:37 a.m. and to remain in effect until the facility can meet CDHS requirements (cross reference with F908). Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/18/25 at 4:34 p.m., with Administrative Staff B (ADM B), Site Review Inspection Report, dated 10/28/24, was reviewed. ADM B confirmed she received the report which indicated the grease trap (a plumbing device intended to capture fats, oils and grease from wastewater) was in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program when: 1) Evidence of a rodent infestation was at the offsite commissary (a rentable commercial kitchen) and 2) A fly infestation was present in the designated dietetic service space (formerly the facility breakroom). These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) for 57 of 59 residents who received food from the facility ' s kitchen. Findings: 1) During an interview at the facility on 3/28/25 at 3:37 p.m., the Dietary Manager stated all resident food was being prepared in their commissary kitchen due to remodeling of their onsite kitchen. During an interview on 3/28/25 at 4:05 p.m., [NAME] M stated she was working earlier in the day when a County Health Inspector (Inspector C) visited the commissary kitchen. [NAME] M stated Inspector C found bags of stuffing mix that had been chewed and subsequently discarded the bags. [NAME] M stated Inspector C found rat poop behind the stove and a hole in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 62 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure an abuse allegation was reported to the appropriate agencies within 2 hours after an allegation was made for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure could put the resident's safety at risk and potentially hinder the ability to properly investigate and protect the resident due to a lack of time to intervene effectively. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness and Anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation). Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 10/7/24 indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (memory). Resident 1's MDS also indicated he was dependent on staff with his care except for eating and oral hygiene on which needed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident when a staff member (Unlicensed Staff C) was allowed to continue working on her shift while the investigation for the abuse allegation was in progress. This failure reduced the facility ' s potential to protect Resident 1 from further abuse while the alleged abuse investigation was in progress. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (demographics) indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness and Anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions that cause fear, dread and other symptoms that are out of proportion to the situation). Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) dated 10/7/24 indicated Resident 1 had intact cognition (memory). Resident 1 ' s MDS also indicated he was dependent on staff with his care except for eating and oral hygiene on which needed substantial assistance from staff. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility was free of pests when flies were seen flying throughout the facility. The facility did not adequately address the pest problem, leading to residents being bothered by flies in their room while trying to rest and eat their meal. Flies were seen flying in the kitchen, which could lead to contamination of food being prepared and the spread of disease. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/21/24 at 10:08 a.m., a fly was flying around Resident 30's bed. Resident 30 stated he had been having a fly issue and pointed to a plug-in bug trap, which trapped flies, and a sticky fly paper trap hanging on the side of the curtain rod. There were multiple dead flies in the plug-in bug trap and a few dead flies on the sticky fly paper trap. Resident 30 stated the cartridge inside the plugin bug trap had not been changed for several weeks. Resident 30 had a portable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their responsible party with a summary of the resident's Baseline Plan of Care for four of 18 sampled residents (Resident 45, 48, 54, and 108). This failure had the potential to limit communication with the resident and/or their responsible party on how the facility planned to manage the resident's needed services and treatments while at the facility, which could have led to the resident feeling stressed, uneasy and lack of trust with the staff providing care, leading to negatively affecting the resident's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 45's admission Record, indicated Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including Acute (short-term condition) and Chronic (ongoing condition) Respiratory (breathing) failure with Hypoxia (having to little oxygen), Morbid Obesity (excessive body fat), Chronic Congested Heart Failure (a weakened heart condition that occurs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1.the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) who has specialized training in therapeutic rehabilitation) process was followed when one out of two sampled residents (Resident 6) did not have a weekly summary completed by the RNA and there were no monthly summary meetings in Resident 6's electronic medical chart 2. the RNA followed the splint (provide a slow force to stretch the contracture- tightening of muscles that causes the joints to shorten, and improve mobility) order for both hand flexion contracture (shortening and hardening of muscles, resulting to deformity) management for one out of two sampled resident (Resident 6). These failures placed Resident 6 at risk for further contracture, pain and development of wound. Findings: A review of Resident 6's face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness, Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS, pain that lasts over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-25 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — patternEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary behavioral health care and services (a range of treatments and services that address a person's mental and emotional health) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 27). This failure put Resident 27 at risk for worsening of mental health symptoms, poor physical health, social isolation, and decreased quality of life. Findings: A review of Resident 27's face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized process for evaluating a resident's health and functional abilities in a nursing home) assessment dated [DATE] indicated an active diagnoses of Depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest and can interfere with your daily living) and Persistent Mood Disorder (a continuous, long-term form of depression, persistent feeling of low self-esteem, failure and hopelessness). Resident 27's Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Implement EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions: a set of infection control guidelines that use personal protection equipment [PPE: gown and gloves] to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs: a bacteria that has become resistant to an antibiotic [medication that treats a bacterial infection]) for two of 18 sampled residents (Resident 30 and Resident 108) and five unsampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 9, Resident 212, Resident 213, and Resident 214), who had wounds and required dressing changes, and/or indwelling medical devices, such as a foley catheter (a flexible tube that is inserted into the bladder to drain urine or a gastrostomy tube (G-tube: is a tube that is surgically inserted through the abdominal wall and into the stomach to provide a way to deliver nutrition, fluids, and medications directly to the stomach.) and 2. Ensure a service technician wore a hairnet and beard covering when entering the kitchen to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an alleged abuse allegation for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 6) within 2 hours to California Department of Public Health (CDPH, responsible for and enforces some of the laws in the California Health and Safety Codes), the Ombudsman (official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints) and the local Police Department (PD). This failure put Resident 6 and all the vulnerable residents at risk for abuse to continue. Findings: A review of Resident 6's face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness, Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS, pain that lasts over 3 months) and Spinal Cord Disease (SCD, nerve damage that cause permanent severe problems, such as paralysis (loss of the ability to move (and sometimes to feel anything) in part or most of the body) or impaired bladder and bowel control). Resident 6's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, mandatory tool used to screen and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1.ensure an appropriate notice of discharge (a written document provided to a patient or their representative usually given before or at time of discharge (in an emergency) which explains why the patient is being discharged and provides information about their next steps and ongoing care) was provided to the resident and/or representative and ensure the Ombudsman (an official appointed to investigate individuals' complaints against maladministration) was notified when one out of two sampled residents (Resident 57) was sent to the emergency department (ED, department of a hospital responsible for the provision of medical and surgical care to patients arriving at the hospital in need of immediate care) on 8/1/24. 2.ensure Licensed Staff were aware to notify the Ombudsman whenever there was a facility-initiated discharge (discharge initiated by the facility) such as transfer to the hospital. These failures could result in potential violations of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-25 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized process for evaluating a resident's health and functional abilities in a nursing home) Discharge Assessment (DCA, a required part of the process for evaluating the health of a resident and their discharge plans when they leave a nursing home) for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 28). This failure could potentially lead to improper care planning on Resident 28's new discharge setting which could also potentially put Resident 28's safety at risk. Findings: A review of Resident 28's face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 28 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). Resident 28's Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with notifying a resident's physician of the RD's (Registered Dietitian) recommendation for the nutritional supplement, Med Pass (helps provide extra calories and protein to help patients gain weight or recover from illness) for one of eighteen sampled residents (Resident 30), who had lost 16 pounds in one month (8.65% unplanned weight loss), which is severe weight loss. This led to Resident 30 losing more weight, which could prevent Resident 30's right heel ulcer (pressure sore is an injury to the skin and underlying tissue) from healing or cause it to become worse, and could cause an overall decline in Resident 30's physical wellbeing. Findings: A review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including Cellulitis of the Left Lower Leg (a bacterial infection that affects the skin's deeper layers), Muscle Weakness, Abnormalities of Gait (a manner of walking or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) out of five sampled residents from a staff member (Licensed Staff A) verbally abusing Resident 1. This failure had the effect of causing emotional distress as evidence by Resident 1 crying. Findings: During an interview on 9/25/24 at 2:52 pm. Administrator stated, Licensed Staff B presented him with a recording, dated 6/23/24, of Licensed Staff A and Resident 1 which Resident 1 ' s family member had sent to the facility. Administrator stated the audio recording consisted of Licensed Staff A, berating, cursing and demeaning Resident 1. Administrator stated Licensed Staff A was put on immediate suspension and then subsequently employment was terminated by the facility. Administrator stated Resident 1 was no longer residing at the facility and had been discharged on 7/21/24. During an interview on 10/2/24 at 11:10 am with Licensed Staff B, Licensed Staff B stated the tone from Licensed Staff A was badgering and there were many [derogatory comments] throughout the conversation. Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0562 — patternProvide immediate access to any resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure access to residents when the phones in the facility were left unanswered. This failure resulted in a pharmacy not being able to get in contact with nursing staff to clarify physician ' s ordered medication, and Confidential Complainant not being able to reach staff. This led to Resident 5 not receiving Paxlovid (a medication that helps stop mild-to-moderate COVID-19) for 5 days, and Confidential Complainant unable to discuss an urgent matter with staff. Findings: During a phone call to the facility on 9/29/24 at 2:30 p.m., the facility ' s phone rang 20 times then rolled over to a message, All our agents are busy. One could leave a message. During an observation on 9/30/24 at 9:50 a.m., a receptionist was sitting at the reception table located to the right of the entrance door, screening people for COVID and answering the facility ' s phone. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/30/24 at 11:20 a.m., the Receptionist was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 5 and Resident 6) when physicians ' order for medication administration were not followed: 1. Resident 5 never received Paxlovid (an antiviral medication) to treat symptoms of COVID-19 which could lead to hospitalization and death and 2. a licensed nurse did not follow physician orders and administered Duloxetine HCI Delayed Release (an antidepressant also used to treat chronic pain ) 60 mg (milligrams) to Resident 6, instead of the physician ordered dose of 30 mg, upon Resident ' s 6 ' s request. These medication errors resulted in to 1. Resident 5 not having a speedy recovery, and 2. Resident 6 becoming upset and refusing to take her physician ' s ordered dose of 30 mg, which had the potential to led to withdrawal symptoms. Findings: A review of Resident 5 ' s admission Record, indicate Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-01 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — patternMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The call light (a device used by residents to call for assistance from staff) was always functioning for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. A touch pad call light was provided for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who had difficulty using a call button per his request. 3. The call light or an alternative was available for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 7). These failures resulted in: A. Resident 1 worried he could not call staff for assistance if there was an emergency situation and Resident 1 yelling for help instead of using the call light. B. Resident 7 was at risk for staff not meeting his needs and late provision of care. Findings: A review of Resident 1s face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness, Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS, pain that lasts over 3 months) and Spinal Cord Disease (SCD, nerve damage that cause permanent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-01 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their smoking policy when one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) was allowed to vape (an electronic cigarette, to inhale and exhale vapor containing nicotine and flavoring produced by a device designed for this purpose) inside his room, and implement the smoking assessment recommendation for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was allowed to vape without staff supervision. These failures put Resident 1 ' s roommates at risk for second hand vape exposure (to fine and ultrafine particles that contain nicotine, that might exacerbate respiratory ailments like asthma (narrowing of airways), and constrict arteries (blood vessels tighten) which could trigger a heart attack, and put Resident 1's safety at risk for burns, device/battery explosion and accidents. Findings: A review of Resident 1s face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0555 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to involve two out of two residents (Residents 1 and 2) in decision making regarding their choice of physician when the facility transferred their care to another physician without their consent. This failure violated residents ' rights to choose their own physician. Findings: A review of Resident 1s face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness, Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS, pain that lasts over 3 months) and Spinal Cord Disease (SCD, nerve damage that cause permanent severe problems, such as paralysis (loss of the ability to move (and sometimes to feel anything) in part or most of the body) or impaired bladder and bowel control). Resident 1s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognition, the process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses of residents) dated 8/29/24 score was 15 out of 15 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents, Resident 6, when a licensed nurse, RN K, did not follow the rights of medication administration (the right patient, the right medication, the right dose, the right time, the right route, right indication) and administered Duloxetine HCI Delayed Release (an antidepressant also used to treat chronic pain ) 60 mg (milligrams) to Resident 6, instead of the physician ordered dose of 30 mg, upon Resident ' s 6 ' s request. This failure led to Resident 6 refusing to take her physician ' s ordered dose of 30 mg, which had the potential to cause withdrawal symptoms for Resident 6 and had the potential for other residents not to receive their medications according to physician orders and professional standards. Findings: A review of Resident 6 ' s admission Record, indicated Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included sciatica (pain, weakness, numbness, or tingling in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility ' s policy on death was followed for one out of two sampled resident (Resident 2) when: 1. Resident 2s death was pronounced by a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN); and, 2. Staff did not inform the mortuary if an autopsy was to be performed due to Resident 2 ' s unexpected death. These failures may put the residents at risk for missed diagnostic errors and missed opportunities to improve medical treatment. Findings: A review of Resident 2s face sheet (demographics) indicated Resident 2 was readmitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Muscle Weakness and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 2s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognition, the process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses of residents) dated [DATE] score was 12 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident 2s face sheet also indicated she was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-14 · tag F0742 — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record the facility failed to provide appropriate behavioral health services and treatment when one of one sampled resident (Resident 9) was not provided anti-psychotic medications and mental health treatment services. This failure resulted in Resident 9 being denied his anti-psychotic medication resulting him hitting another resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's admission Record dated 10/24/23, indicated Resident 9 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of depressive disorder, other stimulant abuse, and elevated blood pressure. A review of Resident 9's Discharge Summary from facility in [town], dated 10/24/23 indicated Resident 9 had been prescribed Seroquel or Quetiapine, (medication prescribed as an antipsychotic medication for psychiatric diagnosis like bipolar, major depressive, delusions/hallucinations, posttraumatic stress disorder and schizophrenia to name a few) and to remain taking this medication, as one tablet (50 mg) by mouth every day, two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, sanitary, comfortable and homelike environment for residents, when: a. there was a strong urine odor (ammonia-like) in the hallway, resident rooms and bathrooms; b. the floors were sticky; c. toilet roll holders were missing in the resident bathrooms, causing toilet paper to be stored out of reach on the bathroom safety handrail or on the back of the toilet (toilet tank lid); d. bathroom walls and cubbies over the toilet bowls had yellow brown splatter; e. a bathroom fan had a loud noise; f. urinals and graduates to collect urine, located in bathrooms, were not labeled, wheelchairs, Hoyer lifts (a mobile tool used to lift, reposition and lower a resident into a wheelchair or bed), and scales were stored in hallways, causing residents to not have access to the safety handrails; g. residents were having to listen to roommate's blaring television; and, h. bathroom call lights were not checked routinely to ensure they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient and competent nursing staff to meet the residents needs and assure resident safety, when the facility did not provide adequate staffing based on their facility assessment, for 19 out of 31 days for 3/2023, 15 out of 25 days for 4/2023, 21 out of 31 days for 5/2023, and three out of five days from 6/1/23 up to 6/5/23. The facility did not ensure there were enough night shift Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) on duty for 17 out of 30 days on 4/2023, 18 out of 31 days for 5/2023, and three out of six days from 6/1/23 up to 6/6/23. These failures could compromised resident safety, which could result in falls, injuries and increased incidents of abuse. Findings: During an interview on 4/25/23 at 11:52 a.m., Unlicensed Staff A stated the facility was frequently short-staffed. Unlicensed Staff A stated he had 11 residents to care for today. Unlicensed Staff A stated it was difficult to care for all their residents under their care if they were short-staffed, but they did their best.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-09 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietetic services observations, dietary and administrative staff interview and administrative document review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian (RD) and/or Dietary Manager (DM) comprehensively evaluated the effectiveness of the food service operation, as evidenced by: * Lapses in the delivery of services associated with staff competency (Cross Reference F802); * Meal distribution accuracy, nutritional values of food and physician orders, consistent with the current standard of practice, the approved diet manual and RD approved menu (Cross Reference F804 and F808); * Food safety (Cross Reference F812); * The dietetic services physical environment (Cross Reference F908); and, * Provision of guidance and oversight to the Dietary Manager. Failure to ensure dietetic services were accurately and effectively delivered may result in compromising the nutritional status of residents through the potential transmission of foodborne illness, incorrect plating of physician-ordered therapeutic diets and/or decreased nutritional intake due to poor resident acceptance of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. the call light (a device used by a patient to signal his or her need for assistance from professional staff) was within the residents' reach for three out of 16 sampled residents, (Resident 22, 47 and 207) and one unsampled resident (Resident 26); 2. the room call light system was working for one out of 16 sampled residents (Residents 157); 3. the residents' bathroom call light could be accessed by a resident lying on the floor for 16 out of 17 bathrooms (Rooms 1 through 9, Rooms 16 through 19, and Rooms 21 through 23); and, 4. the bathroom call lights were in good working condition for nine out of 17 resident bathrooms (Rooms 5, 7, 9 16, 17, 19, 21, 22, and 23). These failures could result in accidents, a resident falling to the bathroom floor and being unable to signal staff they needed immediate assistance, late provision of care or care not being rendered at all, and left Resident 157 feeling hopeless and worried,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to promote care that enhanced dignity and respect for three out of 16 sampled residents (Resident 8, 11, and 47) and two unsampled residents (Resident 7 and 37), when: 1. staff closed the door to drown out Resident 11's pleas for help, and would answer the telephone calls from Resident 11 by saying, Domino's Pizza or Round Table Pizza; 2. staff did not knock on the door, before entering resident rooms and staff would talk in their native language (not English language) within residents' earshot, for Residents 11, 7 and 37; 3. the resident privacy curtain was not pulled for Resident 8, when were not clothed appropriately; 4. a Physical Therapist Aide worked with Resident 8, during transfer to a wheelchair, while Resident 8 was unclothed; 5. staff did not make sure Resident 8 was cleaned and clothed property, when visiting family members. Resident 8 was soiled, did not receive peri care prior to this visit; 6. staff left the overhead bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool that measures health status in nursing home residents) assessments were completed timely, when the MDS quarterly assessment (used to track the resident's status between comprehensive assessments, and to ensure monitoring of critical indicators of the gradual onset of significant changes in resident status), for seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents 27, 22, 51, 5, 37, 50 and 6), and the MDS Annual assessments (a comprehensive assessment that requires a full MDS with care plan that outlines what needs to be done to manage the residents care needs), for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 25, 9 and 20), were overdue. These failures could result in the nursing home staff's late identification of residents' needs or health problems. Findings: During a concurrent interview and MDS assessment record review, on 6/6/23 at 3:47 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the MDS assessments should be completed timely to ensure residents were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staff were aware of the Basic Care Plan (BCP, a plan that promotes continuity of care and communication among nursing home staff to increase resident safety) completion time frame and BCP's were completed timely, for seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 4, 15, 16, 49 and 157). These failures had the potential to put residents' safety at risk and for residents to not receive the care that they need. Findings: During an interview on 6/6/23 at 12:03 p.m., Licensed Staff B and Licensed Staff J stated BCP's were to be completed within 72 hours of admission. Licensed Staff J stated it was important for the BCP's to be completed and done timely because it provided staff an overview on how to safely care for the residents. Licensed Staff J stated if residents BCP was not done or completed timely, residents could be at risk for late provision of care. During an interview on 6/6/23 at 3:01 p.m., the Activity Director (AD) stated she was part of the team that conducted BCP for newly-admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an individualized care plan for 4 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 8, 19, 47, and 207), when: 1. Resident 8 was not care planned for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living: Related to personal care, which include bathing or showering, dressing, getting in and out of bed or a chair, walking, using the toilet, and eating) including refusal of showers, not wanting to wear clothes, and needing assistance with toileting; 2. Resident 8 was not care planned for taking the blood thinner Plavix (Clopidogrel Bisulfate: to prevent heart attack and stroke); 3. Residents 8 and 207 were not care planned for Discharge Planning; 4. Resident 47 was not care planned for Hospice [A type of care and philosophy of care that focuses on the palliation (easing with the severity of a pain or a disease without removing the cause) of a chronically ill, terminally ill or seriously ill patient's pain and symptoms, and attending to their emotional and spiritual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for three of 16 sampled residents (Resident 8, 19, and 33) when: 1. The facility did not assess Resident 19 for bowel movement (BM) care after Resident 19 did not have a BM for more than three days; 2. Resident 33's Foley catheter (thin, flexible tubing used to drain urine from the bladder by way of the urethra: The tube through which urine leaves the body) leg bag (small bag strapped to one's leg to collect urine and lets one move about more easily when up and about) was not changed to a urine drainage bag (collects a large amount of urine, hangs at the side to the bed, and used when one sleeps at night), which should be positioned lower than the bladder to prevent urine from flowing back into the urinary bladder; and, 3. Resident 8's medication was found left on his over-bed table. These failures had the potential for: 1. Resident 19's abdomen feeling full, bloated, and in pain, hard stools…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide regular scheduled showers for eight out of eight sampled residents (Residents 29, 7, 52, 5, 49, 11, 53 and 46). This failure led to residents feeling frustrated and annoyed and could lead to broken skin, wounds and infections. Findings: A review of Resident 29's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was 77 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hypertension (high blood pressure), Major Depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Insomnia (trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or getting good quality sleep). Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes), dated 1/9/23, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents) score was 12,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide six of 16 sampled residents (Resident 8, 19, 20, 33, 47, and 207), who were dependent on staff for their personal care, their three weekly scheduled showers.This resulted in residents looking unkempt, feeling neglected and unclean, and had the potential to negatively impact the resident's physical and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis including a complete traumatic amputation (level between left hip and knee), orthopedic aftercare, stroke, seizures, weakness, needing assistance with personal care, amongst others. A review of Resident 8's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set, a clinical assessment process provides a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capabilities and helps staff identify health problems), dated 4/12/23, indicated Resident 8 had a BIM (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1) ensure residents were provided the needed care and services which were resident-centered and met the professional standards of practice, when an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a different types of experts that work together to share expertise, knowledge, and skills to impact patient care) recommendation for a psych consult regarding an abuse allegation was not completed for four out of eight sampled residents (Resident Residents 26, 17, 33 and 53) and an abuse care plan (CP, a document that outlines your assessed health and social care needs and how you will be supported) was not created for two out of eight sampled residents (Residents 165 and 22). 2) ensure residents were receiving care in accordance with professional standards of practice, when the facility lacked the essential supplies, such as wash cloths, incontinence briefs and incontinence wipes, to use for three out of three sampled residents (Resident 11,7 and 37) and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA: Assists residents with therapeutic exercises involving transfers, bed mobility, positioning and range of motion (passive/active) interventions to promote, restore and maintain one's independence) program was being continued as physician ordered, for three of 16 sample residents (Resident 4, 11, and 42) and two unsampled residents (Resident 41 and 52). This failure resulted in a disruption in treatment and had the potential for residents to have a decline in range of motion, strength and endurance, an increase in joint pain and depression, and an overall decrease in Activities in Daily Living (ADLs: Includes eating, dressing, getting into or out of a bed or chair, taking a bath or shower, and using the toilet.). Findings: During an interview on 6/6/23 at 11:15 a.m., the Interim DON (Director of Nursing) stated there was no RNA right now, but someone was going to be starting tomorrow, 6/7/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe at the facility, when their wanderguard alarm system (a wander management solution for resident safety to protect those at risk of elopement) was broken. This resulted in one resident (Resident 16) leaving the building undetected and placed two out of two sampled residents (Residents 28 and 53) at risk for leaving the facility unassisted, potentially having a fall, an accident, or being struck by a vehicle, possible resulting in injury or death. Findings: A review of Resident 16's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was 62 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hypertension (high blood pressure), Repeated Falls, Syncope (loss of consciousness for a short period of time) and Obesity (abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health). Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident dining observations, medical record review and Registered Dietitian interview, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and implement nutritional interventions for 1 resident (Resident 47) who lost a total of 21 pounds over a period of three months. The facility failed to provide recommended nutritional interventions; the RD failed to implement the current standard of practice of providing a nutrition-focused physical assessment; the interdisciplinary committee failed to provide a meaningful analysis of identified weight loss and follow the facility care plan policy for assessment of weight loss and provision of palliative care. Unintended weight loss is strongly correlated with increased morbidity and mortality in the older adult. Findings: Review of a Practice Paper published by the American Dietetic Association, dated 2010, indicated, In older adults, a 5% or more unplanned weight loss in 30 days often results in protein-energy undernutrition as critical lean body mass is lost.that may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the nursing notes and documentation's were accurate, when there were conflicting progress notes information for three out of eight sampled residents (Residents 20, 26 and 53). This failure resulted in inaccurate documentation which could lead to confusion, potentially impacting continuity of care. Findings: A review of Resident 26 face sheet indicated he was 61 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Hypertension (HTN, high or raised blood pressure), Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), Anxiety (Feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may occur as a reaction to stress), Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language) and Dysarthia (slurred or slow speech that can be difficult to understand). His Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietetic services observation, dietary staff interview and departmental document review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency, when: 1) one cook did not prepare pureed items in accordance to standards of practice; and, 2) one cook was unable to calibrate a thermometer and one cook was unable to properly take food temperatures. Failure to ensure staff competency may result in unsafe food production practices or preparation of food that did not fully meet resident needs, which in turn may result in compromised nutritional status. Findings: 1. The current standard of practice when preparing pureed meals is to ensure the resulting product can be eaten with a spoon and falls off the spoon in a single spoonful when tilted. The item cannot be drunk from a cup because it does not flow easily. When a fork is pressed on the surface it will make a clear indent on the surface of the food and the food retains the indentation (International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative, July 2019). During initial tour on 5/30/23, beginning at 10 AM, in the kitchen refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on meal distribution observations, the facility failed to follow the physician-ordered diet when: 1) Residents 22 and 42, with physician-ordered mechanical-soft diets, received potato chips; 2) Residents 4, 15, 18, 19, 20, 26, 29, 32, 41 and 50 did not receive their physician-ordered fortified diets for lunch on 5/30 and 5/31/23. The facility also failed to ensure the physician's diet orders were consistent with the facility-approved menu and current standards of practice for Residents 4, 5, 7, 11, 12, 14, 16, 19, 21, 24, 28, 157, and 158. Failure to ensure accurate meal distribution may put residents at risk for choking, weight loss, and decreased meal satisfaction, further compromising medical status. Findings: 1. During meal distribution observation on 5/30/23 beginning at 11:30 AM, [NAME] 1 was cutting lasagna for the noon meal. Upon completion of the task, [NAME] 1 prepared the noon meal tray for Resident 38. It was noted the meal tray ticket (a document used to identify the type of physician-ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on food production and food storage observations, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared and/or stored in a safe and effective manner when: 1) there was no time/temperature control documentation for facility prepared tuna salad; 2) the facility retained unlabeled and/or undated food items; 3) staff stored utensils in a manner that may promote contamination of food; and, 4) staff did not cook one poultry item to the proper internal temperature. Failure to ensure systems that support all aspects of food safety may result in practices associated with foodborne illness and contamination of resident food. Findings: 1. Potentially Hazardous Foods (PHFs) are those capable of supporting bacterial growth associated with foodborne illness. PHFs include protein-based products such as meat as well as eggs and dairy among others. PHFs require time/temperature control monitoring for food safety. Records must be maintained to verify that the critical limits required for food safety are being met. Records provide a check for both the operator and the regulator in determining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and facility document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI, a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement. It combines two approaches - Quality Assurance (QA) and Performance Improvement (PI). QA is a process used to ensure services are meeting quality standards and assuring care reaches a certain level) failed to identify quality deficiencies as evidenced by: 1) Staff Annual Competency Skills checks for the nurses and Certified Nursing Assistants were not done since 2021; 2) The facility did not provide the residents an environment that was homelike. The floors were dirty and sticky, there were foul odors in the building, and the bathroom toilet and walls in the residents' room did not appear clean and looked as if they were not being cleaned adequately; 3) The facility's Registered Dietician (RD) did not provide oversight in the kitchen/dietary department, which resulted in no onsite RD services, and all RD services were remote. The recipes were not being followed and the physician's order was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of the dietary department, the facility failed to ensure maintenance the physical environment when there were multiple areas of the kitchen with surfaces that were deteriorated, not smooth or readily cleanable. Failure to maintain the physical environment of dietetic services may promote the growth of pathogenic organisms, create an environment for pest harborage or result in physical contamination of food. Findings: 1. Food-contact surface is defined as a surface of equipment or utensil with which food normally comes into contact; or a surface of equipment or utensil from which food may drain, drip, or splash into a food, or onto a surface normally in contact with food. Multiuse equipment is subject to deterioration because of its nature, i.e., intended use over an extended period. Certain materials allow harmful chemicals to be transferred to the food being prepared which could lead to foodborne illness. In addition, some materials can affect the taste of the food being prepared. Surfaces that are unable to be routinely cleaned and sanitized because of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were receiving their medications timely and were notified of any changes in their medications, for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 11, 7 and 37). This failure was a violation of resident's rights and a safety issue as residents may be receiving medication without a resident's consent. A review of Resident 11's face sheet (demographics) indicated he was 55 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Hypertension (high blood pressure), Obesity (abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that presents a risk to health), Major Depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and Anxiety Disorder (condition in which a person has excessive worry and feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness). His Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free form sexual abuse, for one out of seven sampled residents (Resident 53), when a male resident (Resident 26) grabbed (seized quickly) her breast, touched her breast twice and fondled her breast (caress sexually in a prolonged way), and the facility did not address the risk of this incident occurring again. This failure could put the resident at risk for further sexual abuse and feelings of shock, shame, anger and depression. Findings: A review of Resident 26's face sheet indicated he was 61 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Hypertension (HTN, high or raised blood pressure), Dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), Anxiety (Feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may occur as a reaction to stress), Cognitive Communication Deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1) ensure the 5-day summary report, regarding an abuse allegation, was completed and sent to the state within five working days, for three out of four abuse allegations (for Residents 26 and 20, for Residents 17 and 33 and for Residents 165 and 22), the SOC 341 was completed within two hours after an allegation was made for two out of six sampled residents (Residents 160 and 161) and ensure staff were aware of abuse reporting time frames; and, 2) follow up, investigate and report a possible abuse, for one out of nine sampled residents (Resident 14). These failures could put residents' safety at risk and could result in ongoing abuse. Findings: 1a) A review of Resident 165's face sheet indicated she was 84 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Hypertension (HTN, high or raised blood pressure), Muscle Weakness (a lack of strength in the muscles) and Schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a sexual abuse allegation was investigated thoroughly for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure could potentially put the facility residents' safety at risk and could result in ongoing abuse. Findings: A review of Resident 6's face sheet (demographics) indicated she was 68 years-old, initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Vascular Dementia with behavioral disturbance (changes to memory, thinking, and behavior resulting from conditions that affect the blood vessels in the brain), Cognitive Communication Deficit (a condition wherein a person has difficulty communicating because of injury to the brain that controls the ability to think) and Huntington's Disease (an inherited disorder that causes neurons [nerve cells] in parts of the brain to gradually break down and die. Her Minimum Data Sheet Assessment (MDS, a federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based dietetic services observations, dietary staff interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure staff competency when: 1) staff did not prepare the diabetic dessert for the noon meal on 8/22/23, in accordance with the facility spreadsheet; and, 2 ) one staff member (Dietary Staff 4) did not test sanitizer strength in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. Findings: 1. During initial tour of the kitchen dry storage area, on 8/22/23, beginning at 1:20 p.m., there was a large sheet pan covered with parchment paper labeled, dessert for 8/23/23. In a concurrent interview, the Dietary Manager (DM) indicated it was peach crisp. During general food production observation on 8/23/23, beginning at 11:25 a.m., Dietary Staff (DS) 5 was portioning the dessert for the noon meal. It was noted all the desserts were taken from one sheet pan. During meal distribution on 8/23/23, beginning at 12:15 p.m., all residents received the same dessert. In a follow-up interview on 8/23/23 at 2:30 p.m., the surveyor asked DS 6 to demonstrate the recipe used to prepare the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-02-14 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the provision of daily Registered Nurse (RN) services when an RN was not present at the facility on 4 weekend days in January, 2022. This failure prevented professional RN oversight and assessment of nursing services and general operations that impact the care and treatment of vulnerable residents residing at the facility. Findings: During an interview and concurrent review of the February RN schedule, the corporate Director of Staff Development (CDSD) stated the Director of Nursing and Infection Preventionist were the only full-time RN's at the facility. CDSD stated RN A was the only part-time RN, who is giving us availability (to work) these days. During review of the January, 2022 schedule and concurrent interview on 2/14/22 at 2:16 p.m., RN Consultant was queried about expectations for RN coverage at the facility. RN Consultant stated RN coverage should be, every day for eight hours. RN Consultant confirmed no RN's worked at the facility on 1/15/2022, 1/16/2022, 1/22/2022 and 1/23/2022. When queried…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program when: 1. Facility staff (Screener M) gave her used vape pen (battery-powered device that produces vapor from any of a variety of substances, especially liquid containing nicotine or cannabinoids, allowing the user to inhale the aerosol vapor) to Resident 3 to utilize; and 2. The facility did not ensure its emergency water was stored per CDC (Center for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines or per manufacturer's directions, and did not develop a policy and procedure for treating, monitoring, and accessing its facility-treated emergency water. Failure to implement an effective infection control program can potentially result in the spread of infections and potentially lead to harm for a population of residents with complex medical conditions. Specifically, these failures caused Resident 3 potential exposure to disease-causing microorganisms (present on Screener M's used vape pen) and residents, staff and visitors potential exposure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with dignity when: 1) Staff did not prevent two male residents (Sampled Resident 23 and an Unidentified Resident) from wandering to into the rooms of 3 female residents (Sampled Resident 98 and Sampled Resident 41 and Unsampled Resident 99) and did not create care plans to address the female resident's fear resulting from the incidents; and 2) The facility's beautician cut one resident's hair (Resident 2) without notifying, or obtaining permission from, her Responsible Party (RP; family member who was designated as Resident 2's decision-maker). These failures caused Resident 98 to scream, Resident 99 to feel scared and subsequently scream, and Resident 41 to scream and feel unsafe, and for Resident 2's family member to be upset. Findings: 1) During an observation on 02/07/22 at 11:05 a.m., Resident 23 left the facility through the exit door next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. An alarm rang as he walked out the door; his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure nursing staff utilized professional standards when providing resident care when: 1) 3 of 4 licensed nurses (LN N, LN H, and LN I) administered rapid-acting insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar in diabetics; onset of action is within 15 minutes) too early, or without food; and 2) LN C, LN D, and LN Q documented administration of IV (intravenous) medications for RN's who gave the medication. (LN's C, D, and Q were licensed vocational nurses [LVN's]; giving IV medication was outside the LVN's scope of practice. A registered nurse [RN] is qualified to administer IV medication). These failures caused potential for harm in Residents 98 and 7, who could have experienced hypoglycemia (*) when their rapid-acting Insulin was not given timely, and resulted in medication documentation inaccuracies for Resident 100, who received the IV medication. *Hypoglycemia occurs when blood sugar levels fall too low; the most common cause is a side effect of drugs used to treat diabetes (like insulin); symptoms include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: A. prevent falls (defined as moving downward, typically rapidly and freely without control, from a higher to a lower level) in two (Resident 34 and Resident 148) out of six sampled residents and B.ensure one resident (Resident 3) used the designated smoking area that contained fire prevention equipment (ashtray, fire prevention blanket and fire extinguisher) when Resident 3 smoked. These failures had the potential to cause physical harm, psychological harm and even death. Findings: A. 1. Review of Resident 34's, admission Record, dated 8/18/21, indicated she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), anxiety and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident 34's, admission Brief Interview for Mental Status, dated 8/23/21 indicated she had severe cognitive impairment (inability to think clearly, reason and make decisions). During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they had sufficient Healthcare Personnel to meet the residents required care needs and provide adequate supervision to residents at risk for falls when the facility was short-staffed nurses and Certified Nursing Assistant(s) (CNA) on multiple occasions. This failure resulted in staff not being able to attend to resident's needs, such as turning, repositioning, and feeding assistance, provide adequate supervision, and timely medication administration, the scheduled Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA: person-centered nursing care designed to improve or maintain the functional ability of residents) being reassigned to CNA duties, and Resident 41 being incontinent of urine while waiting for her call light to be answered. This had the potential to lead to residents not being turned/repositioned, receive assistance with meals, and adequately monitored to prevent falls. This failure led to late medications administered and a disruption in the resident's Restorative Care Program. This failure led to Resident 41…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate medication administration when the nursing medication error rate was 8%. 3 of 4 licensed nurses (LN N, LN H, and LN I) administered rapid-acting insulin (medication to treat high blood sugar in diabetics; onset of action is within 15 minutes) too early, or without food. These failures caused potential for harm in Residents 98 and 7, who could have experienced hypoglycemia (*) when their rapid-acting Insulin was not given timely. *Hypoglycemia occurs when blood sugar levels fall too low; the most common cause is a side effect of drugs used to treat diabetes (like insulin); symptoms include shakiness, anxiety, and sweating and can progress to blurred vision, seizures, and loss of consciousness. [https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/hypoglycemia/symptoms-causes/syc-20373685#:~:text=Hypoglycemia%20is%20a%20condition%20in,who%20don't%20have%20diabetes] Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 2/09/22 at 12:04 p.m., LN N gave Resident 98 an injection of Humalog (insulin lispro;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — patternSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and facility document review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program failed to identify quality deficiencies as evidenced by: 1.a) Timely Insulin administration was identified as a concern such as Lispro, a fast-acting insulin medication for diabetes. (cross reference F 759) 1.b) Multiple falls with injuries, 9 falls in October 2021 and 9 falls in November 2021 (cross reference F689) 1.c) Multiple female residents were fearful for their safety while a male resident, unsupervised, wandered in their rooms (cross reference F 550); and 2) The facility did not develop a policy and procedure for emergency water treatment, storage, monitoring and safe accessing/use of the water (cross reference F880). Failures to identify and systematically develop a plan of corrective actions may potentially result in adverse effect to resident's safety, health and well-being. Findings: 1) During an interview on 2/14/22 at 11:48 a.m., in the Administrator's office with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the doctor and responsible person for one (Resident 123) out of two sampled residents who suffered an accident. This failure resulted in the doctor not being able to make the decision to transfer the resident to a higher level of care for evaluation and the responsible person not being allowed to participate in plan of care decisions creating frustration and lack of trust in the quality of care being provided. Findings: During a review of Resident 123 's, Face Sheet dated October 2017, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 123 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of cerebral infarction (area of the brain that did not get blood supply resulting in permanent damage to the brain) , left leg below the knee amputation (removal of a limb) and peripheral vascular disease (a blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels outside of your and brain to become narrow, blocked or spasm causing pain and fatigue). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to keep one resident (Resident 34) free from abuse out of three sampled residents when Resident 34 and Resident 7 were indicated to be sitting on top of the bed fondling each other's private parts. This failure had the potential result of physical and emotional harm to both residents. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's, admission Record, dated 8/18/21, indicated she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), anxiety and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 34's, admission Brief Interview for Mental Status, dated 8/23/21 indicated she had severe cognitive impairment (inability to think clearly, reason and make decisions). During a review of Resident 34's, Nursing Progress Notes, dated 11/7/21, indicated Resident 34 and Resident 7 were found seated together on a bed and the two residents were touching, each other's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual abuse to the officials in accordance with State law through established procedures (including to the Department and Long Term Care Ombudsman Agency) for one sampled resident (Resident 34). This failure had the potential to delay investigation and affect the physical and psychosocial well-being of the resident. Findings: During a review of Resident 34's, admission Record, dated 8/18/21, indicated she had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning), anxiety and generalized muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 34's, admission Brief Interview for Mental Status, dated 8/23/21 indicated she had severe cognitive impairment (inability to think clearly, reason and make decisions). During a review of Resident 34's, Nursing Progress Notes, dated 11/7/21, indicated Resident 34 and Resident 7 were found seated together on a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate data entry or code in Minimum Data Set/Resident Assessment (MDS) for one of four residents, Resident 35. The MDS Coordinator (LN L) coded Yes to indicated that Resident 35 had a foley catheter/nephrostomy tube (an elastic tube connected to the kidney to drain the urine located in the lower back). This failure had the potential to result in misinformation and incorrect care planning for Resident 35. Findings: During an observation on 2/7/2022 at 10:45 a.m., in the hallway, Resident 35 was sitting in her wheelchair. There was no urine bag attached on the wheelchair or tubing visible. During a telephone interview on 2/9/2022 at 10:35 a.m., Licensed Nurse L (LN L) stated, she worked part time as an MDS Coordinator for the facility. LN L stated she wrongfully coded the MDS, dated [DATE], in Section H, under Bowel & Bladder, under foley catheter/nephrostomy for Resident 35. LN L stated, she made an error in the MDS by marking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0642 — isolatedEnsure a qualified health professional conducts resident assessments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's Registered Nurse (RN) Coordinator failed to ensure accuracy of resident's assessment in the Minimum Data Set/Resident Assessment Instrument (MDS/RAI) for one of four residents, Resident 35. This failure had the potential to result in incorrect nursing care plan for Resident 35 by not following the nursing care with foley catheter/nephrostomy tube compared to a nursing care plan for bowel and bladder training for incontinence (loss of control with urine and bowel). Senior [NAME] President Consultant (SVPC), RN, signed and approved the MDS assessment that Resident 35 had a foley catheter/nephrostomy tube (an elastic tube connected to the kidney to drain the urine located in the lower back). Resident 35 did not have a foley catheter nor Nephrostomy tube since 1/13/2021. Findings: During an observation on 2/7/2022 at 10:45 a.m., in the hallway, Resident 35 was sitting in her wheelchair. There was no urine bag attached on the wheelchair. Per MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to accurately and completely document in the medical record in accordance with professional standards for one of two sampled residents (Resident 123) when Resident 123 had an accident by sliding out of the wheelchair onto the floor and no nursing assessment was observed in the medical record. This failure resulted the in the facility and the Department not being able to review events surrounding the accident or the potential for delay in injury identification by other staff not being aware that an accident had taken place. Findings: During a review of Resident 123 's, Face Sheet dated October 2017, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 123 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a history of cerebral infarction (area of the brain that did not get blood supply resulting in permanent damage to the brain), left leg below the knee amputation (removal of a limb) and peripheral vascular disease (a blood circulation disorder that causes the blood vessels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-14 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolatedHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI Plan described a process to identify and correct deficiencies when: a) There were no tracking and measuring performances for falls in residents. b) There was no monitoring or evaluating the effectiveness of corrective action/performance improvement activities and revisions as needed for nursing practice in medication administration such as insulin (medication for high blood sugar). c) There were no records of analyzing underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies such as a male resident wandering to female resident's rooms. This failure resulted in repeated falls with injuries, unsafe nursing practice of medication administration, and residents experienced increased fear and feeling unsafe from a wandering male resident. Findings: During an interview on 2/14/22 at 11:48 a.m., in the Administrator's office, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, the QAPI meetings were held on 3/2021, 7/30/2021, 8/6/2021, 9/8/2021 and 10/2021. During an interview on 2/14/22 at 11:50 a.m., the DON stated, the list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-14 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program Committee failed to have a minimum required staff attendees during a QAPI meeting when: 1. There was no attendance sheet during a QAPI meeting held on 3/2021. The DON was not able to specify the exact date of the March 2021 meeting. 2. There were no nursing staff attendees during the QAPI meeting held on 7/30/21. Findings: During an interview on 2/14/22 at 11:48 a.m., in the Administrator's office, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, the QAPI meetings were held on 3/2021, 7/30/2021, 8/6/2021, 9/8/2021 and 10/2021. During an interview and record review on 2/14/22 at 11:50 a.m., the DON stated, there was no record of attendance for QAPI meetings held in 3/2021. During an interview and record review of QAPI meetings held on 7/30/2021 at 12 p.m., the DON stated, she couldn't not confirm any nursing staff attended the 7/30/2021 meeting. A review of the facility's Policy & Procedure (P&P) titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan release date January…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$36,288 in federal fines across 5 penalties.
- $17,940 — penalty dated 2025-07-28
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.6 | -1.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2019 |
| BANSAL, JAGAN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 50% | since 04/17/2023 |
| BANSAL, MANEESH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 50% | since 04/17/2023 |
| RELIANT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 12/12/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056259. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.