No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Northgate Postacute Care

40 Professional Center Parkway, San Rafael, CA 94903 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 52 certified beds · (415) 479-1230 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 actual-harm citations$112,869 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $112,869 in federal fines (most recent 2023-09-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.4 mi
1500 Northgate Dr · (415) 492-0888 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4140 Redwood Hwy · (415) 755-4435 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Mcnears Beach Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.6%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.6%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.7%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.9%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.1%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.8%12.0%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.07U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 6.8–18.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified30.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.371.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.21
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.70
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
45.5%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 47.8 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.21 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.70 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.22 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-21)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2021-09-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

65 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-01-07 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) of five sampled residents from misappropriation (the unauthorized use of another person's property or money without permission) of property when Staff 1 made unauthorized charges to Resident 1's credit card.This failure resulted in Staff 1 misappropriating $27,571.50 from Resident 1's bank account which would leave a reasonable person upset, disturbed and financially injured. Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis which included major depressive disorder (a serious mood disorder which causes persistent sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest which significantly impairs daily life), mild neurocognitive disorder with behavioral disturbance (a condition that impairs mental functions like memory, thinking, and reasoning due to brain damage from various causes), anxiety disorder (a mental condition characterized by excessive fear which can impair daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2023-09-29 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 5 of 5 sampled residents wanting to be discharged (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4 & Resident 5) with a discharge planning process which addresses each resident's discharge goals and needs, including referrals to local contact agencies for placements (Finding a home to meet medical, functional and emotional needs of the residents after discharge from a health care facility), and involved the interdisciplinary team in developing the discharge plan. These findings resulted in severe emotional and psychological harm to Resident 5, including suicidal ideation (Thinking about planning suicide) with the development of a suicide plan by Resident 5, and depression and stress for all the residents involved. Findings: Record review of an e-mail sent to the Surveyor by Witness XX on 8/23/23 at 10:19 a.m., indicated Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4 & Resident 5 were awaiting discharge and felt like they were not being helped by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gdisputed · IIDR2020-02-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect two of eight sampled residents (Resident 8 and Resident 96) from resident-to-resident abuse, when a verbal altercation between them, in which profanity was used, was overheard by staff, who failed to report it to facility administration, and initiate appropriate interventions to eliminate abuse and prevent reoccurrence. This failure resulted in reoccurrence of verbal aggression, and emotional distress, to Resident 8 and Resident 96. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Vascular Disorder of Intestine (A condition in which there is a decrease in intestinal blood flow) and Mood Disorder (A group of conditions characterized by a serious change in mood that cause disruption to life activities), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Record review indicated Resident 8's MDS (Minimum Data Set - U.S. federally-mandated process for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services (RNS) were provided to three of three sampled residents reviewed for RNS (Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3) when services were not provided as ordered by the physician (MD) or provided without an order, not as scheduled and care planned or without active care plans.This failure decreased the facility's potential to provide residents with appropriate services to maintain or improve their limitations in range of motion and mobility.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted in 12/24 with the diagnosis of hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/6/26, indicated he had no memory impairment. The MDS also indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards for one of three sampled residents reviewed for medication administration (Resident 1) when he was not given his blood pressure medication per the physician's (MD) order and missed doses on two consecutive days. This failure had the potential to result in elevated blood pressure and increased leg swelling for Resident 1.Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated he was admitted in 12/24 with diagnoses of essential hypertension (HTN- high blood pressure with no single identifiable cause) and venous insufficiency, chronic and peripheral (condition in which the vein valves in the legs are weakened or damaged causing blood to pool in the legs). A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 4/6/26, indicated he had no memory impairment. A review of Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 5/26, indicated a MD order for hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to conduct a thorough background screening for one employee (Staff 1) when Staff 1's criminal background check results indicated it was incomplete. This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect and prevent abuse to their resident population.Findings:A review of Staff 1's personnel record on 1/7/26 indicated Staff 1's criminal background check (a screening process to investigate an individual's criminal history revealing details like felony and misdemeanor convictions, arrests, pending court cases, and active warrants) indicated the 7-year county review need attention. The background check notes indicated, Service closed as incomplete. attempted to obtain information from the applicant/client however a response with the needed information was not received.In an interview on 1/7/26 at 12:45 p.m. with the Administrator (Admin), the Admin stated, he would not have moved the applicant forward until the matter had been satisfied. The Admin further confirmed there was no documentation in Staff 1's file that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight hours a day for four days in July 2025. This failure had the potential to result in inadequate care for a medically fragile population of 48 residents.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/21/2025 at 3:04 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the facility's, Job Code RN Time Sheet, report dated 1/1/2025 to 8/21/2025 was reviewed. The RN time sheet report indicated an RN worked less than 8 hours as follows:S 7/6/2025, 5.85 RN hoursS 7/12/2025, no RN hours/no RN presentS 7/13/2025, no RN hours/no RN presentS 7/20/2025, 5 RN hoursThe DON confirmed, she did not work on 7/6/2025, 7/12/2025, 7/13/2025 and 7/20/2025 and there was no RN present for eight hours. The DON stated she and the MDS Registered Nurse (MDS RN) did not work weekends and did not know why they didn't see this, or catch this. The DON further stated it was not normal for an RN not to be present for a minimum of eight hours a day and there should have been an RN onsite. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate did not exceed five percent when seven identified medication errors out of 26 opportunities were observed:1. The wrong form of aspirin was administered to Resident 29 and Resident 34.2. Senna (medication used to stimulate bowel movement) and docusate sodium (medication used to soften bowel movements) were not held in accordance with the physician order for Resident 25.3. Resident 25 was not instructed to chew a chewable aspirin.4. The wrong form of Vitamin C was administered to Resident 25.5. Resident 25 did not receive dapagliflozin (medication used to treat diabetes mellitus- a condition when the body doesn't create enough insulin) when ordered.These failures resulted in an overall facility medication error rate of 26% and had the potential to result in negative health outcomes for Resident 25, Resident 29, and Resident 34.Findings:1a. During a review of Resident 29's admission Record, dated 8/21/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This REQUIREMENT is NOT MET as evidenced by:Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, labeled, and prepared under sanitary conditions when: 1) Staff food items were stored in Refrigerator #2 with the resident food items.2) An unlabeled and undated container of peaches was stored in Refrigerator #2 and was not properly disposed of.3) A dietary staff member with facial hair was observed in the kitchen preparing lunch for the residents without a beard restraint.4) Chopped salad was observed outside the cold holding temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (measurement of temperature) or below.These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for developing food-borne illnesses (sickness by consuming contaminated food or drinks) by exposing residents to contaminated food and unsanitary practices. Findings:1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/18/2025 at 3:10 p.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), in the facility's kitchen, an unlabeled food item wrapped in a paper towel was observed inside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain three out of 13 resident bathrooms when they were found in disrepair. This failure had the potential to result in an unsanitary and uncomfortable homelike environment. t Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/2025 at 7:30 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], the toilet seat had numerous scratches. The DON stated it was not normal, and it needed to be replaced.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/2025 at 7:34 a.m. with the DON in the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], the door frame was corroded away at the baseboard exposing a large black hole with debris inside. The DON stated it needed to be repaired immediately.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/2025 at 7:37 a.m. with the DON in the shared bathroom for room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], the baseboard was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) provided wound care to one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 1) without a physician's order. This failure had the potential to result in delayed wound healing for Resident 1.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face sheet (demographics), [undated], the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD, a lung condition that causes long-term breathing problems) and sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection).During an observation on 8/20/2025 at 8:28 a.m. in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 had a white bandage, falling off on her left hand with a skin tear exposed. LVN 1 removed Resident 1's bandage, cleansed with wound cleanser and applied A&D ointment (skin protectant used to treat and prevent minor skin irritations). LVN 1 cut a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure collaborative care with the contracted hospice agency was provided for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 36). This failure had the potential to affect Resident 36's safety and comfort of care. Findings:During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, dated 8/23/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis (a condition where surgically implanted left hip comes out of place) and Huntington's disease (a condition in which nerve cells in the brain break down over time). During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/2025 at 8:20 a.m. with the Hospice Registered Nurse Case Manager (HRN), in Resident 36's room, the HRN was observed standing next to Resident 36 wearing a gown and gloves and wound supplies on the table. The HRN stated she did not have the wound orders and had not updated the binder with wound care plans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for two of two employees (Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] 3 and CNA 4). This failure had the potential to result in an inability to correct poor performance and compromise patient safety.Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/21/2025 at 11:17 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 3's employee record was reviewed. There was no annual performance evaluation for 2024/2025. The DSD stated CNA 3 should have had an annual performance evaluation.During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/21/2025 at 11:38 a.m. with the DSD, CNA 4's employee record was reviewed. There was no annual performance evaluation for 2024/2025. The DSD stated CNA 4 should have had an annual performance evaluation.During an interview on 8/21/2025 at 11:50 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she was unaware of multiple staff not having performance evaluations and the evaluations needed to be completed annually.During a review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 52 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of used fentanyl patches (potent opioid medication used to pain management). This failure had the potential to result in drug diversion, inaccurate medication accountability and unsafe medication management.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/20/2025 at 11:36 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), in the east wing hallway, the medication cart had nine opened and used fentanyl patches stored in a plastic cup. LVN 2 stated the fentanyl patches needed to be disposed of by the Director of Nursing (DON).During an interview on 8/20/2025 at 12:39 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated used fentanyl patches should not have been stored in the medication cart and should have been brought to the DON for proper disposal.During an interview on 8/21/2025 at 3:43 p.m. with the Pharmacist (Pharm), the Pharm stated used fentanyl patches should be cut up and placed into a disposal bin that was filled with liquid to ensure it was unable to be reused. The Pharm further stated fentanyl…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to safely store and label drugs in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when:1. One medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. This failure had the potential to result in residents and staff obtaining unauthorized access to medications and supplies that could lead to adverse effects.2. An open bottle of Senna syrup (laxative medication used to stimulate a bowel movement), stored in the medication cart did not have an expiration date. This failure had the potential to result in Senna syrup having a reduced effectiveness, potential bacterial contamination and unpredictable side effects.Findings:1.During an observation on 8/20/2025 at 8:27 a.m. in the hallway of the west wing between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER], Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) was standing next to the medication cart and walked away into room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication cart was left unlocked and unattended.During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This REQUIREMENT is NOT MET as evidenced by the following:Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was properly disposed of when trash was observed on the ground and in an unsecured garbage dumpster, creating an unsanitary environment with the potential to attract pests.Findings:During an observation on 8/20/2025 at 7:41 a.m. in the facility's garbage storage area, one trash dumpster was observed with both lids unsecured and open due to overflowing garbage. Multiple bags and boxes of trash were also observed on the ground in the garbage storage area.During an interview on 8/20/2025 at 11:20 a.m. with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), CDM stated leaving trash unsecured and on the ground was unacceptable because it attracts pests and rodents to the facility.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Garbage and Trash, dated 2023, the P&P indicated, Adequate, clean, vermin-proof areas must be provided for storage of garbage and rubbish.all food waste must be placed in sealed leak-proof, non-absorbent, tightly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice services met professional standards for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 36) when:1. The Hospice Registered Nurse (HRN) left Resident 36 exposed to the public for approximately 22 minutes, with no clothes from the waist to the feet.2. The Hospice Registered Nurse's (HRN) conduct was unprofessional towards Resident 36.These failures had the potential to cause physical and psychosocial harm to Resident 36.Findings:1.During a review of Resident 36's admission Record, dated 8/23/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses of dislocation of internal left hip prosthesis (a condition where surgically implanted left hip comes out of place) and Huntington's disease (a condition in which nerve cells in the brain break down over time). During a review of Resident 36's Patient Billing/Care Level Change, document dated 8/4/2025, the document indicated, Resident 36 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify the need to place one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 37) on Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control strategy used to prevent spread of bacteria), while having multiple open wounds. This failure had the potential to result in the spread of dangerous multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) among the residents and staff.Findings:During a review of Resident 37's admission Record, dated 8/21/2025, the admission record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of complete traumatic amputation (surgical removal) of the left midfoot.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/18/2025 at 4:08 p.m. with Resident 37, in Resident 37's room, Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, specialized clothing and equipment to protect infectious agents) and EBP signage were not posted outside of Resident 37's room. Resident 37 had a white kerlix (woven gauze used for absorbing fluids), bandage on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in a safe and operating condition when:One of the laundry machine was covered in rust and was broken.The bed locks for Resident 36 were not working. These failures had the potential to affect the resident's health and safety. Findings:1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/19/2025 at 2:05 p.m. with the Housekeeping Staff (HSK) and the Maintenance Director (MDR), in the laundry room, two laundry machines were observed. One of the laundry machine was broken and covered with rust. The MDR confirmed one of the laundry machines was broken. The HSK stated the broken laundry machine had been broken for quite some time, and it delayed the laundry process for the residents. During an interview on 8/21/2025 at 2:53 p.m. and at 4:59 p.m., with the MDR, the MDR stated the broken laundry machine should be repaired as soon as it is found to be broken, to better serve the residents and for the safety of the staff. MDR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0924 — isolated
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one handrail was secured to the wall. This failure had the potential to result in residents utilizing an unstable handrail that could subsequently cause a sudden fall and serious injuries.Findings:During an observation on 8/18/2025 at 4:43 p.m. in the east wing hallway, one handrail on the wall between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 10 had a crack along the seam of the handrail and was not firmly secured to the wall.During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/18/2025 at 5:42 p.m. with the Maintenance Director (MDR) in the east wing hallway, the MDR tugged on the handrail between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 10 and the handrail separated from the wall. MDR stated the handrail should have been secured to the wall and it needed to be reenforced.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Maintenance Service, dated January 2018, the P&P indicated, The maintenance department is responsible for maintaining the buildings,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) of their responsibilities as a resident when Resident 1 ' s daily rate for room and board increased twice (on 1/1/24 and 1/1/25) with no advanced written notice and required a security deposit with no advanced written notice. These failures caused financial hardship to Resident 1 who stated, It ' s really ruined my life, and stated she felt poor. Finding: During an observation on 2/5/25 at 9:57 a.m., a sign posted in the facility hallway indicated the private pay daily rate was $525 for a two-bed room. During an electronic medical record review on 2/5/25 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 1 ' s face sheet indicated she was admitted [DATE], payor information indicated Private Pay, and Resident 1 ' s power of attorney for healthcare was Family Member (FM) 4. Review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/8/24 indicated a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0620 — isolated
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain signed admission agreements for three of five sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3), and failed to give one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) a copy of the admission agreement. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having no documentation of what daily room rate or security deposit she had agreed to pay on admission, and had the potential to result in Resident 2 or 3 having no document for reference when they need information about the terms of their admission. Finding: During an electronic medical record review on 2/5/25 at 11:42 a.m., Resident 1 ' s face sheet indicated she was admitted [DATE], payor information indicated Private Pay, and Resident 1 ' s power of attorney for healthcare was Family Member (FM) 2. Review of Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/8/24 indicated a BIMS score of 13 (Brief Interview for Mental Status, a score of 13 to 15 indicates no cognitive impairment). During an interview on 2/5/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Thoroughly investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property per policy, 2. Implement the plan to protect other residents from theft, 3. Maintain a theft and loss log, and 4. Incorporate reported incidents of misappropriation of property into the facility quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program for two of two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) with reports of missing debit cards and money missing from their bank accounts. These failures put vulnerable residents at risk of misappropriation of property. Findings: 1. On 1/22/25, the Department received a report from the facility that the police had informed the facility staff that Resident 1's family had reported Resident 1 had lost some money and an investigation was started. During a record review and concurrent interview on 2/6/25 at 12:20 p.m., Administrator verified an untitled, undated document kept in the investigation file for Resident 1's reported lost money…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician visits for one resident (Resident 1)of three sampled residents timely. This failure had the potential to delay detection of declining health and the provision of care. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 2/14/15 with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue to die) affecting left dominant side. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool), dated 2/19/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation and judgement status of the resident) score of 13, which indicated no cognitive (related to processes of thinking and reasoning) impairment. During an interview on 3/3/25, at 10:23 A.M., Resident 1stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-09 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain documentation and present evidence of its ongoing Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program implementation and activities. Findings: During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:15 A.M., Unlicensed Staff B stated she did not know what the Quality Committee or QAPI was. She stated she did not know if there were any current quality improvement projects. During an interview on 1/9/25 at 10:20 A.M., Unlicensed Staff A and Unlicensed Staff C stated they did not know what the Quality Committee or QAPI was. The stated they did not know of any current quality improvement projects. During an interview with Administrator on 1/9/25, at 11:45 a.m., she stated she could not find a binder for the QAPI Committee. At 11:50 a.m., she provided a QAPI binder for review and stated the only documentation it contained was dated 12/2024. She stated there was no other documentation available. She stated the QAPI was supposed to meet monthly. She stated she did not know what the current QAPI was and if there were any performance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-03 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to prevent the infestation of roaches when: 1. Live and dead cockroaches were observed in the pantry and food preparation areas in the kitchen where residents ' food was stored and prepared; 2. Pest technician recommendations for the control of the roaches were not followed; and, 3. The bedroom of two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2), had roaches crawling in and around their beds causing Resident 1 to stop eating the food from the facility. These failures created an environment for harboring of pests and the potential for contamination of the food prepared and served. Findings: 1. During a kitchen observation on 11/27/24 at 10:08 a.m., a brown winged insect was seen climbing along an electrical cord, up and onto a shelf next to the ice machine and the coffee maker, and directly across from the refrigerator in the kitchen pantry. Insect bait traps were seen in the kitchen pantry and around…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was invited to participate in quarterly care conferences (interdisciplinary meetings to review and revise residents care plans). This failure deprived Resident 1 from providing input into the care and services provided to him at the facility. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 1's clinical record on 4/26/24, at 1 p.m., indicated no evidence Resident 1 was invited or participated in his quarterly care conferences for the past 12 months. During an interview on 4/26/24, at 2 p.m., Resident 1 stated he had not been invited to participate in quarterly care conferences. Resident 1 stated he had the right to attend his care conferences. During an interview on 4/26/24, at 3 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked for documentary evidence Resident 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) was seen by a physician at least every 60 days. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive medical care. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a primary diagnosis of generalized anxiety disorder. A review of Resident 1's clinical record on 4/26/24, at 1 p.m., indicated only two physician Progress Notes in the past 12 months: One dated 3/25/24, and another dated 4/22/24. During a concurrent interview, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide evidence Resident 1 was seen by a physician at least every 60 days in the past 12 months, and requested the respective Progress Notes. The DON reviewed Resident 1's clinical record and provided only three additional physician Progress Notes, dated 5/9/23, 10/18/23 and 4/9/24. The DON stated Resident 1 refused physician visits. The DON was asked for evidence Resident 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 did not receive Restorative Nursing Services (RNS-range of motion and other physical exercises to promote safety and independence, provided by Restorative Nursing Assistants (RNAs)) according to physician orders. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of not achieving her highest practical physical well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. A review of Resident 1 ' s Discharge Notice indicated she was discharged from the facility on 10/10/23. During an interview on 11/6/23, at 4:24 p.m., Resident 1 ' s family stated Resident 1 did not receive RNS during her stay at the facility. A review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record indicated eight physician orders for RNS, as follows: 5/13/22: RNA to provide resistance ROM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received physician visits at least every 60 days after admission when Resident 1 did not receive a physician visit for a period of 152 consecutive days during her stay at the facility. This failure had the potential to deprive Resident 1 of physician care. Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s facesheet indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. A review of Resident 1 ' s Discharge Notice indicated she was discharged from the facility on 10/10/23. A review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record indicated monthly physician visits except during the months of June, July, August, and September 2022. A review of Resident 1 ' s physician progress notes indicated Resident 1 had a physician visit on 5/20/22 and the next one on 10/6/22, comprising a period of 152 days without a physician visit. During an interview on 12/14/23, at 11:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide discharge notices to the Long-Term-Care Ombudsman (A representative that assists residents in long-term care facilities with issues related to day-to-day care, health, safety, and personal preferences), as required by the Federal regulations. For three of four sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 11 & Resident 12), the facility was unable to provide documentation of discharge notices sent to the Ombudsman, but the Ombudsman office indicated the facility had discharged 13 residents in recent months and only provided discharge notices for 4 of them. In addition, some of the discharged notices included incomplete documentation. This finding had the potential to result in unsafe discharges and inability for the Ombudsman to advocate for the residents in case of inappropriate discharges, which ultimately could have caused harm to the residents. Findings: During a phone interview on 8/22/23 at 10:13 a.m., the office of the Long-Term-Care Ombudsman indicated they had not received discharge notices from the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide RNA (A Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] with special training, skills and knowledge that provides therapeutic or rehabilitative services to residents under the direct supervision of a licensed professional) therapy services to three of three sampled residents (Resident 5, Resident 6 and Resident 7) that had physician orders for these services. This could have resulted in inability for the residents to restore their functional body movements, be able to walk and become independent. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Fracture of Right Lower Leg (A break in one or both bones below the knee and above the ankle, of the right foot), and Laceration (A deep cut or tear of the skin or flesh) of Right Hand, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 5's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet-An assessment tool) dated 8/15/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not have sufficient staff to meet the care needs of three of four sampled residents (Resident 7, Resident 8 & Resident 9) when they were not provided with activities of daily living (ADLs-Activities related to personal care such as bathing and toileting) as required, and call lights were not answered promptly. During the morning shifts of 9/17/23 and 9/18/23, only two Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) were assigned to provide ADL services to all 40 residents of the facility, an assignment of about 20 residents per CNA. In addition, staffing shortages occurred in all shifts. These findings had the potential to result in harm to the residents involved, inability for staff to respond to medical emergencies, and lack of health services provided to the residents of the facility. Findings: Resident 7 Record review indicated Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Cirrhosis of the Liver (A condition in which the liver is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services to 5 of 5 sampled residents wanting to be discharged (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4 & Resident 5). These residents were not provided with assistance in finding placements for discharge, and three of them stated not having State identification cards (IDs) or medical insurance cards. These findings had the potential to cause harm, stress, and frustration to the residents involved. Findings: Record review of an e-mail sent to the Surveyor by Witness XX on 8/23/23 at 10:19 a.m., indicated Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4 & Resident 5 were awaiting discharge and felt like they were not being helped by the facility with discharge planning (The process of identifying and preparing for a resident's anticipated health care needs after they leave the skilled nursing facility). Record review of an e-mail sent to the previous Social Services Director (Social Services Director J) on 5/25/23 at 10:42 a.m., by Witness YY, a person not from the facility, who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 6) was treated with dignity and respect, when her request to send a check to her sister for $5000.00 was not honored, her DPOA (Direct Power of Attorney- A legal document that authorizes someone else to handle certain matters, such as finances or health care, on another person's behalf) did not receive regular statements of Resident 6's trust account with the facility, and Resident 6 was not provided with requested petty cash from her trust account immediately upon request. This finding had the potential to result in frustration, sadness, depression, and anxiety for Resident 6. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Intervertebral Disc Degeneration (A condition characterized by the breakdown (degeneration) of one or more of the discs that separate the bones of the spine (vertebrae), causing pain in the back or neck and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-29 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to replace or reimburse one of two sampled residents (Resident 5) for items that were lost during his stay at the facility, after having notified Administration about it. In addition, the facility policy on theft and misappropriation of property was extremely limiting and did not protect residents for personal property losses over $100.00. This finding had the potential to result in feelings of frustration, abuse, and sadness to Resident 5 and other potential residents. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Fracture of Right Lower Leg (A break in one or both bones below the knee and above the ankle, of the right foot), and Laceration (A deep cut or tear of the skin or flesh) of Right Hand, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 5's MDS (Minimum Data Sheet-An assessment tool) dated 8/15/23 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) when they began the process of a facility-initiated-discharge and provided a 30-day discharge notice to Resident 3 without a discharge plan or having arranged placement (Appropriate and safe housing that meets the resident's needs) for him. This finding had the potential to result in an unsafe, inappropriate discharge which could have caused harm to Resident 3. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Fracture of Lumbar Vertebra (Broken bone of the spine in the region of the lower back), and Osteoarthritis (A condition in which the cartilage that cushions the ends of bones in the joints gradually deteriorates), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). Record review of Resident 1's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 8/24/23 indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control & prevention program to prevent the spread of COVID-19 when: 1) No designated screener was available in the front lobby to screen staff and visitors for COVID-19 prior to entry to the building, staff and visitors were not properly screened before entry to the building, and equipment was not cleaned and disinfected between use. The screening logs were not reviewed by Infection Preventionist (IP) after completion. 2) Laundry staff stored the dirty apron near the clean linen and resident's clothing in the clean section of the Laundry room. Dirty linen barrel was stored a foot away from the clean linen barrel. 3) No annual Infection Control Prevention training to the staff. 4) Oxygen tubing and humidifier bottles were not labeled with the date they were changed, and a nebulizer mask was not changed for months. These failures had the potential to contribute to an outbreak, or further spread the COVID-19 virus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the laundry equipment in a safe operating condition when one of two washing machines had water leakage that created a rusted area about a foot in length on the ground and in the corner of the washing machine. This failure had the potential to result in injury to the staff and residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/21 at 12:21 p.m., in the Laundry room, one of the two washing machines had leakage and rust in the lower corner and with a foot long rust on the ground. The Housekeeping Supervisor (HS) touched the rusted ground and noted water leakage. HS stated that he would fix it. HS stated the leakage started 2 days ago. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/24/2021 at 11:35 a.m., in the Laundry room, HS stated that there was no more water leakage. HS stated that the washing machine was turned off, not operating. During an interview on 9/24/2021 at 11:37 a.m. the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) stated that the washing machine would not operate until he fixed the leakage. MS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0622 — pattern
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's transfer and discharge Policy and Procedure for non-payment notice or follow Federal regulations. Letters of eviction notice were sent to Resident 25, Resident 29, Resident 22, Resident 5 and to a family of Resident 14. This failure resulted in anguish, fear and emotional stress to the residents and family involved. Findings: During an interview on 9/21/21 at 3 p.m., in Resident 25's room, Resident 25 stated that the previous Administrator (PREV ADM) together with the Social Worker (SW) walked into his room when he was lying on his bed. Resident 25 stated that PREV ADM handed him a letter dated 4/23/2021, indicated that he owned facility for non-payment of $22,788.00. Resident 25 stated that the PREV ADM told him that he had a lot of money and asked how he was going to handle this non-payment, or he would be evicted. Resident 25 stated that he was startled when the PREV ADM approached him. Resident 25 stated that he called his family immediately that day and told them that he will be evicted if he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their full-time Infection Preventionist (IP-The person designated by the facility to be responsible for the infection prevention and control program), was able to perform her IP role when she was assigned to work on the floor and provide direct patient care. This failure had the potential to result in breaks in infection control, which could have resulted in spread of COVID-19 and other pathogens among residents and staff at the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/20/21 at 11:55 a.m., Licensed Staff B, who was the facility appointed Infection Preventionist, was observed working on the floor, passing medications. Licensed Staff B confirmed she was the assigned nurse for Resident 191. Licensed Staff B was subsequently observed working on the floor, passing medications, every day from 9/20/21 to 9/24/21 for morning shift. This was confirmed by daily nursing staffing assignments provided by the facility. During an interview on 9/22/21 at 2:32 p.m., Licensed Staff B stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety was maintained when: 1. A spoiled lettuce and potato were stored in the kitchen refrigerator and dry storage with other produce in good condition, and; 2. Undated and unlabeled perishable food items were left in a resident's room (Resident 12) at room temperature, for a prolonged period of time. These findings had the potential to result in food borne illness to Resident 12, and other residents at the facility. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen observation on 09/20/21 at 10:10 a.m., with the Dietary Manger present, a spoiled lettuce was found stored with other lettuce in good condition in the kitchen refrigerator. The lettuce was dark in color, mushy, and dark brown liquid was coming out of it. The Dietary Manager confirmed the observation and removed it from storage. During an observation on 9/20/21 at 10:21 a.m., inside a container in the dry storage, a spoiled potato was found stored with other potatoes in good…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-09-24 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to record the Covid-19 nasal swab test results of unvaccinated staff and visitors. This failure had a potential to result in spread of Covid-19 virus to residents and staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/23/2021 at 10:25 a.m., the Infection Preventionist (IP) demonstrated how to use the Covid 19 test performed to staff and visitors. IP stated that she would perform Covid 19 test to visitors and staff who were not vaccinated prior to entry to the facility. IP stated that after she performed the Covid-19 test, she would record the result. IP stated that she recorded the result in the computer. IP could not locate any record keeping in the computer. IP could not provide any evidence of record keeping of the Covid-19 test for the unvaccinated staff and visitors. A review of the Policy & Procedures title Surveillance for Infections release date 1/2018 revealed that The Infection Preventionist (IP) will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable and homelike environment when: 1. The facility failed to ensure the only soap dispenser in a staff restroom was functional, and; 2. A large area of peeling paint was observed right next to Resident 20's bed. These findings had the potential to result in spread of infections, and discomfort and harm to Resident 20. Findings: 1. During an observation on 9/20/21 at 10:30 a.m., in one of the facility staff restrooms, the only soap dispenser was missing the cover, and was not functional. While it did seem to contain soap, no soap could be obtained from it. Staff assistance was required from Licensed Nurse B, who showed Surveyor how to obtain soap from the broken soap dispenser, however, there were no instructions for other visitors or staff to guide them on how to obtain soap from it. During an interview on 9/22/21 at 2:56 p.m., Maintenance/Housekeeping Supervisor stated the soap dispenser was broken two days prior to the observation on 9/20/21, and while parts were brought to fix it,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure MDS (Minimum Data Set-A federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) assessments were accurate and complete within the required timeframes for two of eight sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 191). This had the potential to result in inability for the facility to identify residents' preferences, goals of care, functional and health status, and strengths and needs. Findings: Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 33's MDS dated [DATE], indicated she had a urinary catheter (A tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder), under the section, Bowel & Bladder. This document indicated it was completed by MDS Nurse. During review of Resident 33's medical records on 9/21/21 at 11:24 a.m., including physician orders for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a registry staff (Unlicensed Staff D) was provided necessary information to care for a non-English speaking resident (Resident 32), when she was not informed this resident had a communication tool available. This had the potential to result in inability for Resident 32 to communicate with staff, which could have caused feelings of frustration and helplessness for Resident 32. Findings: Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (A progressive nervous system disorder that affects movement), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility demographic). The Face Sheet also indicated Resident 32's primary language was Chinese. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/21/21 at 9:46 a.m., Resident 32 was observed in bed, and could not be interviewed, and she did not seem to understand English. The assigned Certified Nursing Assistant, Unlicensed Staff D, who was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective system of accounting and accurate reconciliation of a controlled medication for one resident (Resident 10). This failure resulted in the unaccounted 3 ml lacking from the bottle of Morphine sulfate (opiate pain medication) of Resident 10. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/21/21 at 11:55AM, the Medication Cart at the East Hall containing the 30-ml container for Morphine sulfate of Resident 10 indicated 8ml remaining medication in the container. Licensed Nurse B who was looking at the narcotic count sheet of Resident 10 stated the 30-ml container of Morphine sulfate should have 11 ml remaining. When asked why was there a descripancy in the remaining amount, Licensed Nurse B could not explain why the bottle was approximately 3 ml short. During an interview on 9/21/21 at 12:15pm, when asked why the Morphine sulfate bottle of Resident 10 was short 3 ml, the DON could not explain the discrepancy but stated she will find out. During a follow-up interview on 9/21/21 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication error rate did not exceed 5% when two medication errors were noted among 29 medication administration observations. This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 6.9%. The failure also had the potential to cause adverse consequencies such as hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), upset stomach or diarrhea to Resident 36, and prevent the delivery of the correct dose of medication that could result to inadequate control of asthma and other respiratory disorder symptoms to Resident 12. Findings: 1. During an observation of medication administration on 9/21/21 at 8:18am, Licensed Nurse A administered one tablet of Metformin HCl (is an anti-diabetic medication that lowers blood sugar levels) 500mg to Resident 36. Resident 36 took the medication along with 5 other medications with a glass of juice and water. During an interview on 9/21/21 at 10:26am, when asked if she had breakfast earlier, Resident 36 stated she has not had breakfast. During an interview on 9/21/21 at 10:27am, Staff C stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents' (Resident 12) dietary orders were followed, when staff failed to provide her with a standing order for coffee during her lunch meal. This had the potential to result in frustration and despair to Resident 12. Findings: Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (A group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 12's MDS (Minimum Data Set-An assessment tool) dated 9/03/21 indicated her BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status-A cognition assessment) was 15, which indicated her cognition was intact. Resident 12's 9/20/21 lunch tray card indicated, Standing Orders: 8 fl oz Coffee 4 fl oz Fruit Juice 4 fl oz Milk whole. During dining observation on 9/20/21 at 12:44 p.m., Resident 12 did not receive the coffee in her standing order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect residents' rights when: 1. Four of six sampled residents (Resident 21, Resident 36, Resident 9 and Resident 27) complained of being called Momma and Poppa by facility staff; 2. Five of six sampled residents (Resident 21, Resident 36, Resident 9, Resident 27 and Resident 195) stated having heard facility staff speaking a language other than English in resident care areas; 3. Three of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 36 and Resident 27) stated they had observed staff using personal cell phones during work hours, and; 4. Facility staff was observed not wearing identifying name badges, while other staff was observed wearing name badges which did not include their position or title. These failures had the potential to cause feelings of helplessness, disrespect and frustration to the residents of the facility. Findings: 1) During a Resident Council meeting on 01/28/20 at 11 a.m., in the facility's dining room, four of six residents (Resident 21, Resident 36, Resident 9 and Resident 27) stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-03 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed provide complete and timely discharge notices to the Ombudsman for three of fifteen sampled residents (Resident 33, Resident 8, & Resident 10) when: 1) One discharge notice provided to the Ombudsman did not include the address of the receiving facility, and; 2) Two discharge notices for planned discharges were provided to the Ombudsman after the residents had been discharged from the facility. These failures could have resulted in lack of protection for residents from being inappropriately discharged and lack of advocacy services for the residents of the facility. Findings: 1) Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Vascular Disorder of Intestine (A condition in which there is a decrease in intestinal blood flow) and Mood Disorder (A group of conditions characterized by a serious change in mood which cause disruption to life activities), according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). A Nurse's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain was managed within acceptable standards of care for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 30) when: 1) The facility did not ensure Resident 30's pain level was assessed and reassessed to ensure pain management was effective; and, 2) The facility did to ensure PRN (as needed) pain medication was administered to Resident 30, who had a documented pain level of 6 out of 10 on multiple occasions. These failures may have resulted in suffering and distress to resident 30, who passed away on 01/27/20, at the facility. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon (Colon Cancer) and Heart Failure, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). A physician's order, dated 12/19/19, indicated, Morphine Sulfate (Concentrate) (A narcotic used to relieve moderate to severe long-term pain) Solution 20 MG/ML Give 0.25 ml by mouth every 1 hour as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1) The pureed (food blended to the consistency of applesauce or milkshake texture) diet recipe was followed for nine residents; and, 2) The therapeutic menu was not followed for a resident on a renal, fortified diet. These failures led to residents receiving meals that did not meet their nutritional needs and further compromised their health status. Findings: 1) On 1/30/20, a review of the facility's Cook's Spreadsheet Winter Menus, dated 1/30/20, indicated .Lunch Regular: Roast Beef Savory Thyme Sauce, Red Beans and Rice, Parslied Carrots, Caesar salad . During an observation and concurrent interview of the lunch meal preparation on 1/30/20 at 12 P.M., the [NAME] (CK N) stated the puree entrée was not the same food as the food used to prepare the regular diet meals. CK N stated pureed ground beef was cooked for the pureed diets instead of roast beef that was on the menu for the regular diets. CK N stated, That's how I do it all the time. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) acknowledged CK N did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-03 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a manner which conserved flavor and nutritive value when: 1) The puree recipe for the roast beef entrée was not followed and did not have flavor; and, 2) Palatable meals were not provided to residents. This failure had the potential to affect the meal intake and nutritional status of nine residents who received a pureed diet and other residents who complained about the palatability of the meals. Findings: A review of the November 2020, December 2020, and January 2020, Resident Council meeting minutes was conducted. The January 2020, meeting minutes indicated the temperature of the food was a high concern for residents. 1) During the confidential Resident Council meeting on 1/28/20 at 11 AM, five of six residents in attendance stated having issues with the food at the facility, and four of the six stated The food has no taste. Resident 9 stated most of the food did not have taste and was overcooked. Resident 195 stated she had been served salt and red meat when her the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary conditions were maintained for food storage, according to standards of practice when: 1) Three serving scoops were found dirty with green and brown crusted substances and stored with clean serving utensils; 2) Sixteen plastic bowls were stored wet underneath a food prep counter; 3) Ten potatoes in a supply box of potatoes had black discoloration, were moist and soft to touch were not discarded; and, 4) The ice machine was not cleaned and maintained, according to manufacturer's instructions. These failures had the potential to cause widespread food-borne illness among all 43 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings: 1) On 1/27/20 at 12:30 p.m., during an observation and interview with the DSS in the kitchen, three dirty serving scoops with dry crusted green and brown substances inside, were found stored in a drawer with clean serving utensils. The DSS acknowledged the dirty serving scoops and stated they were not cleaned and stored correctly. According to the 2017, Federal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation was accurate and complete when: 1) Pain assessment and reassessment was not documented for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 30); and, 2) Weekly Nursing Progress Notes were inaccurate for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 30). This failure had the potential to result in lack of lack of communication among the health care team, poor quality of care and inadequate pain management, for Resident 30. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon (Colon Cancer) and Heart Failure, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). 1) Resident 30's Physician orders, dated 12/19/19, indicated, Admit to Hospice Care Hospice Services. Physician orders, dated 12/19/19, also indicated, Monitor and rate pain: Provide non pharmacological intervention prior to administration of pain medication if resident complained of pain .every shift 0-no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the DEPARTMENT of an incident of abuse, when Licensed Staff overheard one resident (Resident 8) yelling at her roommate, using profane language and did not report the incident to facility administration or the required authorities. This failure resulted in abuse reoccurrence. Findings: A Nurse's Note, dated 01/2/20 at 1:09 a.m., documented by Licensed Staff I, indicated, At 12:30 am, heard resident (Resident 8) throwing profanities to her roommate (Resident 96). Resident noted with aggressive behavior towards roommate. Spoke with the resident together with the other charged nurse (Licensed Staff H) and the cna (Certified Nursing Assistant) assigned, to figure out what's going on. Per resident, she hates her roommate and wants to be transferred somewhere else. There were no Nurse's Notes, regarding this incident, documented by Licensed Staff H, who, according to Licensed Staff I's documentation, was also present. A second Nurse's Note dated 01/26/20 at 10:34 a.m., documented by Licensed Staff I' indicated, Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and communicate the transfer or discharge of Resident 45 to the receiving facility when: 1) The medical doctor (MD) ordered to discharge Resident 45 to detox center. 2) The Licensed Nurse failed to report to the receiving facility of the care that Resident 45 received. Findings: A review of the Policy and Procedure of Transfer or Discharge Documentation, released on January 2018, indicated when a resident is transferred or discharged , details of the transfer or discharge will be documented in the medical record and appropriate information will be communicated to the receiving health care facility or provider. Under Process: #4, When a resident is transferred or discharged from the facility, the following information will be documented in the medical record: a) The basis for the transfer or discharge: b) That an appropriate notice was provided to the resident/and or legal representative: c) The date and time of the transfer or discharge: The new…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on Care Plan-Baseline (a baseline care plan must be developed for each resident within 48 hours of admission to the facility. There are no exceptions to this requirement for holidays, weekends, or night admissions, and the baseline care plan was required to address, at a minimum, the following: Initial goals based on admission orders, Physician orders, Dietary orders, Therapy services, Social services, and Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) recommendations if applicable) for one of three sampled residents, Resident 144, when a baseline care plan was not completed within 48 hours after her admission and a summary provided to her. This failure had the potential to result in adverse events most likely to occur after admission (e.g. falls, medication errors, dietary restrictions). Findings: During a review of the Resident 144's, admission Record, dated 2/3/20, the admission Record indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered, comprehensive care plan for constipation, for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 30). This failure had the potential to result in ineffective, incompetent care to Resident 30, who required specific interventions for his disease condition. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon (Colon Cancer) and Heart Failure, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). A facility document titled, Nursing admission Assessment, dated 12/19/19, indicated Resident 30 had a colostomy (A surgical procedure bringing one end of the large intestine out through the abdominal wall, creating an opening which provides an alternative channel for feces to leave the body) upon admission to the facility. Resident 30's Treatment Records indicated he received colostomy care every day during his stay at the facility, from 12/19/19 until 01/27/20. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, professional standards of practice were not followed when a Licensed Nurse failed to check a colostomy bag frequently for one of two sampled residents (Resident 30), who was known to remove his colostomy device during periods of confusion. This failure had the potential to result in skin breakdown, dignity issues, discomfort and harm to Resident 30. Findings: Resident 30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with medical diagnoses including Malignant Neoplasm of the Colon (Colon Cancer) and Heart Failure, according to the facility Face Sheet (Facility Demographic). Resident 30's MDS (U.S. federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes), dated 12/26/19, indicated his BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-a structured evaluation aimed at evaluating aspects of cognition in residents in Medicare or Medicaid certified nursing homes) score was 8, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy, for one of eight sampled residents, Resident 195, when a blister pack (Blister pack contains designated sealed compartments, or spaces, for medicines to be taken at particular times of the day) did not indicate the physician had changed the directions for the use of Midodrine HCL (Midodrine Hydrochloride - a medication prescribed to treat low blood pressure caused by certain conditions). This failure had the potential to result in a significant medication error, which may cause adverse consequences to Resident 195. Findings: During a review of Resident 195's Discharge Summary, dated 1/13/20, the Discharge Summary, indicated, Resident 195 had a discharge diagnosis of hypotension (low blood pressure). The list of new medications prescribed to Resident 195 included Midodrine HCL 5 mg tablet 10 mg PO (by mouth) TIDAC (three times a day before meals) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-03 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and nutrition service's department staff competently carried out kitchen duties in a safe, sanitary manner according to manufacturer's instructions when: 1) A kitchen staff member was unable to verbalize and demonstrate correct techniques related to testing sanitizer buckets; and, 2) A kitchen staff member was unable to demonstrate the correct technique for testing the dishwasher sanitation level. These practices had the potential to expose residents to food-borne illness, due to lack of staff training and monitoring of their duties. Findings: During the initial brief kitchen tour observation on 1/27/20 at 12:30 p.m., an interview was conducted with [NAME] O while cleaning a food prep surface. [NAME] O stated, I used the sanitizer from the red bucket to wipe the surface throughout the day. [NAME] O stated the sanitizer liquid was changed every two hours. [NAME] O was asked to demonstrate how to check for the sanitizer concentration. [NAME] O, took the test strip, dipped it into the red bucket and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the garbage container was completely covered when in used in the kitchen. This failure had the potential to expose the food prepared in the kitchen for residents, and clean dishware, to garbage waste and provide an environment which harbored pests. Findings: During the initial kitchen observation on 1/28/20 at 12:25 PM, the garbage container had a lid with a big hole opening in the center measuring approximately 1-foot x 1-foot. The kitchen staff were in the process of tossing garbage from the soiled trays on the food carts through the center of the garbage lid. On 1/30/20 at 11:20 AM, a Kitchen Staff (Cook O) demonstrated how to disposed of the garbage. [NAME] O rolled the garbage container with the lid that had the big opening in the center, to the outside dumpster, sealed the plastic bag inside the garbage container, and placed it in the dumpster. [NAME] O then placed a new plastic bag inside the garbage container and brought it back to the kitchen. [NAME] O stated the garbage can lid had a hole in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control principles were followed when: 1. A clean linen cart was left partially uncovered while not in use, in a facility hallway, and; 2. A cooler, which contained stool and urine specimens, was placed right next to a sink which was used to obtain water for resident consumption. These failures had the potential to cause contamination of facility resources, spread of infections and water-borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings: 1) During an observation on 01/28/20 at 9:43 a.m., a clean linen cart was partially uncovered in one of the facility's hallways. The cart had a dark green covering, with Velcro straps on the sides to keep it closed when not in use. The Velcro straps were unattached, therefore; the covering was partially open, exposing clean linens inside. This was confirmed by Unlicensed Staff E, who stated the cart should be closed all the way. During an interview with the Director of Staff Development (DSD) on 01/30/20 at 2:43 p.m., she stated clean linen carts were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$112,869 in federal fines across 5 penalties.

  • $94,521 — penalty dated 2023-09-29
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS — 9 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 8 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RMG CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/2019
BANSAL, JAGANIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR50%since 03/30/2015
BANSAL, MANEESHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL33%since 03/30/2015
RELIANT MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/16/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$836K
Related-party expense12% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 10%Other / private 16%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $836K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$443per resident / day
operating cost
$13,466per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$438per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056430. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next