No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Morning Star Post Acute

111 Barstow Ave., Clovis, CA 93612 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 57 certified beds · (559) 299-2591 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (559) 299-2591 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
180 W Shaw Ave · (559) 203-6660 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
159 W Shaw Ave · (559) 298-0600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
80 W Bullard Ave Ste 101 · (559) 712-7970 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Barstow Ave · (559) 324-2600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%0.8%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms17.0%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.8%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.1%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.3%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%11.2%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.592.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.551.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 194 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
93.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.76U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.43hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 93.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.76 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.8%CMS range 51.2–63.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.3–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge93.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge93.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge84.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.1%CMS range 3.6–9.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.88
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
47.7%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 57 beds and averages 51.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.45 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-20)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-09-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to recognize and appropriately act on the clinical change in condition for one of three residents, (Resident 1), when: Nursing staff did not notify the physician on 9/12/25 for abnormal blood lab results. Nursing staff did not notify the physician on 9/13/25 for Resident 1's low blood pressure of 91/55 millimeters of mercury (mmHg- unit of measurement), (normal BP 120/80), elevated heart rate (HR) 116 beats per minute (bpm), (normal range 60-100 bpm). Nursing staff did not recognize and act on the clinical decline of Resident 1 on 9/14/25 when Resident 1 had altered mental status, was weaker than normal, had declined in communication, exhibited shortness of breath and distress, with a BP 86/64 mmHg, HR 118 bpm, temperature 99.2 Fahrenheit (F-unit of measurement) and Oxygen saturation (amount of oxygen in the blood) 75% (normal range 95%-100%). These failures resulted in the grandson (GS) of Resident 1 bringing a change in Resident 1's condition to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 exited the facility unsupervised through the main entrance door, where the door alarm failed to sound an audible alert and staff did not conduct the required fifteen-minute checks. This failure resulted in Resident 1 who was cognitively impaired and has insulin dependent diabetes (IDDM-a chronic condition where the pancreas makes little or no insulin, the hormone which allows sugar to enter cells to produce energy) eloping from the facility and roaming city streets for approximately three hours and eight minutes (between the hours of 3:55 p.m. and 7:03 p.m.) with ambient outdoor temperatures of 98 to 100 Fahrenheit (F-a temperature scale) placing Resident 1 at immediate risk for getting hit by a car and severe medical complications, including dehydration (a condition that occurs when your body loses more fluids that it takes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prepare and store food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for all residents who consumed meals prepared in the kitchen when a of five-pound bag of chicken with a used by date of 2/16/26 was stored in the refrigerator available for residents use. This failure placed residents at potential risk to develop gastrointestinal illness (illness that affects the digestive system [GI tact] which runs from mouth to anus) which could result in serious health conditions. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/17/26 at 8:22 a.m. during initial tour in the kitchen with Dietary Service Manager (DSM), in the refrigerator there was a bag of chicken with prep date of 2/14/26 and used by date of 2/16/26. The DSM stated, It [chicken] was supposed to be used yesterday [2/16/26]. The DSM stated the dietary staff defrosted the chicken more than was needed During an interview on 2/19/26 at 8:28 a.m. with the DSM, the DSM stated the cook was responsible in pulling out food to thaw for use. The DSM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was stored and disposed of in a manner that prevented unsanitary conditions for all the residents in the facility when two of three outdoor dumpsters were observed with the lids open and overflowing.This failure placed residents at potential risk for exposure to pest, offensive odors, and contamination of food or medications which could compromised residents health, safety, and the overall sanitary environment of the facility. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/18/26 at 8:15 a.m. with Dietary Service Manager (DSM), the facility's dumpster located behind the building was observed with two of the lids in the open position. One dumpster contained overflowing garbage in a plastic bag, which prevented the lid from closing securely. The DSM stated, They should have made sure to throw garbage bag in the back first for the lid to close.During an interview on 2/19/26 at 8:35 a.m. with DSM, the DSD stated the facility's dumpster was everybody's responsibility. The DSM stated leaving the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of the resident) was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for two of 10 sampled residents (Residents' 5 and 10) when: 1.Resident 5's change in condition on 2/14/26, when the resident complained of a cough and subsequently received new physician orders, including cough medication, steroids (medicine used to reduce swelling and inflammation), antibiotics (medicine used to treat infections caused by bacteria [germs]) and diagnostic testing. This failure had the potential to result in inconsistent care, lack of staff awareness regarding Resident 5's change in condition and failure to monitor the effectiveness of interventions, which could have led to a decline in Resident 5's respiratory status. 2.Resident 10 did not have a care plan for a fall that happened on 2/15/26. This failure put Resident 10 at risk for additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 12, 49 and 29 ) when:1. Resident 12 was administered 2.5 LPM (liter per minute-a unit of measurement for the flow rate of oxygen) of oxygen therapy (a colorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) without a physician's order.This failure resulted in Resident 12 receiving oxygen therapy without a physician's order which had the potential to result in shortness of breath, oxygen toxicity (lung damage that happens from breathing in too much extra oxygen therapy), and serious medical conditions.2. Resident 49 was not monitored or observed while receiving her medication through hand held nebulizer (HHN-device designed to convert liquid medication into fine mist for treating asthma and respiratory issues), nebulizer machine was turned off by a CNA when Resident 57 stated her treatment was completed and licensed nurse did not verify medication in the HHN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely and securely label and store medications ready for residents use when:1.The medication room contained four expired Fexofenadine Hydrochloride (medication used to treat allergy symptoms) 180 milligrams (mg-a unit of measurement for medication) tablet bottles, one expired Dextromethorphan HBr 20 mg Guaifenesin 400 mg (medication used to treat cough and chest congestion symptoms) bottle and two expired 8.5 fluid ounce Vashe wound solution (skin cleanser used for debriding and irrigating wounds) bottles.This failure placed residents at potential risk to receive ineffective or unsafe medications and wound care solutions, which could lead to delayed wound healing, worsening of underlying medical conditions or preventable hospitalization.2. Two over the counter medication bottles and one metered dose inhaler (MDI-small, handheld, pressurized devise used to deliver a specific, measured amount of medication directly into the lungs as a fine mist) were observed on top of Resident 32's over the bed table…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an effective infection prevention and control program was maintained for two of 15 sampled residents when:1. The facility did not ensure Resident 5 was tested for COVID-19 (Coronavirus is an infectious respiratory disease) in accordance with the facilities policy and procedure titled COVID-19, after Resident 5 developed a cough. This failure had the potential to delay identification of communicable diseases and increase the risk of transmission to other residents and staff within the facility.2. LVN 1 did not wear enhanced barrier precaution (EBP- infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms) personal protective equipment (PPE- protective equipment designed to protect and prevent spread of infection or illness) while handling Resident 4's gastrostomy tube (G-tube-an indwelling medical device inserted into the stomach) during a enteral feeding (a feeding tube that delivers nutrients…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate informed consent was obtained prior to the administration of psychotherapeutic medication (prescription drugs designed to manage mental and emotional disorders by altering the brain's chemical makeup and nervous system) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3, who was her own representative party (RP-a person designated to received updates of resident's care and make decisions), did not sign an informed consent and was administered clonazepam (psychotherapeutic medication used to manage anxiety disorders) 0.5 milligrams (mg- a unit of measurement for medication dosage).This failure resulted in Resident 3's clonazepam informed consent not being complete and accurate prior to administration which lead to Resident 3 not being fully informed prior to receiving psychotherapeutic medication. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its policy on against medical advice (AMA-patient chooses to leave before the doctor recommended discharge) was followed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 57) when Resident 57 left the facility AMA on 2/6/26, and there was no documentation the medical doctor (MD) and administrator (ADM) were notified.This failure had the potential to place Resident 57 at risk of health complications, including worsening of her condition. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record (AR- a document containing resident profile information) dated 12/9/25, the AR indicated Resident 57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included right hip effusion (abnormal accumulation of excess fluid within the hip joint capsule), spinal stenosis (narrowing of spinal canal squeezing the nerves and causing pain, numbness, tingling, or weakness), muscle weakness and abnormalities of gait and mobility. During a review of Resident 57's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 58) when Resident 58's Infection of the foot in Section M (Skin Condition) was inaccurately coded in the MDS assessment dated [DATE]. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 58's care needs not met and the potential for adverse reaction to not be monitored.During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/17/26 at 10:48 a.m. during initial tour in Resident 58's room, Resident 58 was observed lying in bed with facial grimacing stating he has pain on his right foot. Resident 58's right foot was covered with kerlix roll dressing (sterile, crinkled, cotton gauze bandage used to cover, protect, and pack wounds) from above the left ankle to toes, left foot covered with elastic bandage ( stretchy, woven, and reusable fabric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of practice for two of the five sampled residents (Resident 1, and Resident 5) when Resident 1 and Resident 5's medications were not available, and the license nurse did not notify the physician the medications were not administered. This failure had the potential risk for Resident 1 and Resident 5 to experience worsening of existing health conditions and delayed medical response. During a record review on 8/7/25 at 11:47 a.m. with the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) at the nurses' station, Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 8/7/25 was reviewed. The AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of left knee osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time), asthma (a chronic lung disease caused by inflammation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards practice and the facility's policy and procedure for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was not administered medications as ordered by the physician on 5/23/25. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experienced worsening chronic conditions, health deterioration, re-hospitalization and or death. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/12/25 at 3:33 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2) at the nursing station, Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Progress Notes dated 5/23/25 were reviewed. The MAR, dated 5/23/25 at 9 a.m. indicated Resident 1 did not receive Allopurinol for gout (a type of inflammatory arthritis that causes pain and swelling in your joints, usually as flares that last for a week or two, and then resolve) , Duloxetine for depression (feelings of sadness don't go away and can get in the way of your everyday life), Empagliflozin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen according to facility policy and procedures and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration-is a government agency responsible for protecting the public health) Food Code when: 1. There was brown, grey, and black debris observed in several areas in the kitchen, including one ventilator fan in the milk refrigerator, two vents above the dishwasher area, one vent in front of the milk refrigerator and one vent in front of the food warming table. 2. There was black and brown debris found on the cabinet shelves next to the stored clean bowls. 3. There was brown debris on every shelf inside of one food cart. 4. There was brown debris on top of the toaster and brown particles found inside the toaster. 5. There was a beef roast inside a plastic bag covered in ice stored in the meat freezer. These failures had potential for cross contamination (when harmful bacteria accidentally moves from one food item to another) and exposure of microorganisms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for 54 of 54 sampled residents when: 1. The facility's Water Management Program (WMP) was not implemented since 4/8/22 to reduce the risk of Legionella (waterborne bacteria which can cause life threatening pneumonia - a lung infection) and other waterborne pathogens (germs that cause disease) in accordance with the facility's WMP. This failure placed the residents at risk for cross contamination (when harmful bacteria accidentally move from one food item to another), infection and had the potential for not identifying the risk of waterborne illnesses such as Legionella. 2. Resident 13 and Resident 30's oxygen nasal cannula (a small thin flexible tube with two prongs that fit into the nostrils and connects to an oxygen source) was on the floor. These failures placed Resident 13 and Resident 30 at risk for cross contamination which could result in infections and illness. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for nine of 13 sampled residents (Residents' 2, 4, 6, 9, 14, 21, 26, 29, 31, 34, and 106) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 checked Resident 106's blood sugar level (BS-amount of sugar in the blood) without closing the privacy curtain or the door. 2. LVN 3 checked Resident 34's blood pressure (B/P-measures the pressure of circulating blood against the walls of blood vessels [channels that carry throughout the body]) and did not provide privacy. 3. LVN 3 administered medications to Residents' 2, 4, 6, 9, 21, 26, 29, 31, and 34 without closing the privacy curtain. These failures resulted in Resident 2, 4, 6, 9, 21, 26, 29, 31, 34, and 106 not provided respect and dignity during care which could potentially impact residents' well-being leading to vulnerability, decreased dignity, anxiety, stress and depression. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/5/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services on acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of 54 residents residing in the facility when the contracted pharmacist did not check the expiration date of the lorazepam (medication used to treat anxiety and seizure- [a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity in the brain]) medication stored in the emergency kit (E-kit-contains medications provided to residents during emergency situations). This failure placed residents at potential risk for taking expired medications which could lead to serious consequences including reduced effectiveness in treating resident's condition in an event of an emergency and potential adverse reaction. Findings: During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on 12/6/24 at 12:25 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the medication room, the refrigerator e-Kit which contained two vials of lorazepam 2MG/ML (milligram-unit of measurement/milliliter-unit of measurement), with an expiration date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with the facility's Administering Medications, Discontinued Medications, and Storage of Medications policy and procedure when: 1. Treatment cart was left unlocked and unsupervised in front of the nursing station. This failure had the potential for residents and staff to access medicated ointments inside the cart and used which could lead to serious health condition. 2. Resident 14's two inhalers (a device used to give medications in the form of a spray that is breathed in through the mouth) did not have an open date or expiration date on the medication. 3. Resident 14's nasal spray (a devised used to give medications in the form of spray through the nose) did not have an on date or expiration date on the medication. 4. Resident 18's inhaler did not have an open date or expiration date on the medication. These failures had the potential for the medications to be given to Residents'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview during the survey period from 12/3/24 through 12/10/24, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom accommodated no more than four residents in (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]). Findings: Throughout the survey period from 12/3/24 through 12/10/24 three resident bedrooms had more than four residents in each bedroom. rooms [ROOM NUMBER] had eight residents per room. Although the bedrooms accommodated more than four residents, each room met the required needs of the residents, as well as the required square footage. The residents had a reasonable amount of privacy, and closet and storage space were adequate. Bedside stands were available. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for the mobility of the residents. Wheelchairs, devices, and toilet facilities were accessible. The health and safety of the residents will not be adversely affected by the continuance of this waiver. Room Number: Number of Beds: 11 8 12 8 14 8 Recommend waiver…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-10 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for three of 14 sampled (Residents' 104, 19 and 30) when: 1. Resident 104's call light was under his bed and not within his reach. 2. Resident 19 and Resident 30's call lights were on the floor and not within their reach. This failures resulted in the potential harm of Resident 19, Resident 30 and Resident 104 to not be able to call for assistance by using the call light in the event of an emergency. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/3/24 at 7:50 a.m. in Resident 104's room, Resident 104 was sitting up in bed with breakfast tray on top of the overbed table in front of Resident 104. Resident 104 did not answer questions asked, but repeatedly requested for coffee. Call light was not within Resident 104's reach, it was on the floor under Resident 104's bed. During a review of Resident 104's clinical record titled, admission Record, (AR-document containing resident personal information) dated 12/10/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met the professional standards of practice of care for one of 13 sampled residents (Resident 14) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 allowed Resident 14 to self-administer her two inhaler (a device used to give medications in the form of a spray that is breathed in through the mouth) not following their own policy and procedure of self-administration of medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 14 to not received the correct medication dose as ordered by the physician. Findings: During a review of Resident 14's clinical record titled admission Record (AR-a medical document which contains resident's medical history, current health status, diagnosis, medications, and legal documents), dated 12/6/24, indicated Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a chronic lung disease causing difficulty breathing) and asthma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs-routine tasks/activities a person perform daily to care for themselves) were provided assistance to maintain personal hygiene and grooming for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 22) when Resident 22's fingernails were long, jagged, with dark colored particles under the nails and his mouth and in between her teeth had food particles. These failures resulted in Resident 22's poor personal hygiene and had the potential to result in serious health condition. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/3/24 at 8:58 a.m. in west wing hallway, Resident 22 was lying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 22 stated she had been in the facility for a long time. Resident had long, jagged, and dirty nails with dark colored particles underneath the nails. Resident 22 stated staff would help her trim her fingernails but did not remember when the last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-11-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when: 1. [NAME] 2 was unable to properly calibrate the thermometer. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 50 out of 51 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen. 2. [NAME] 2 did not follow manufacturer's guideline time length for testing the red bucket Quaternary (Quat) sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces). This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 50 out of 51 sampled residents who received foods from the kitchen. 3. [NAME] 1 did not follow the Cooks spreadsheet (the menu document used to guide dietary staff on food items, portions, texture of foods and therapeutic diet) portion size to make pureed chicken during the noon meal on 11/7/23. This failure had the potential risk of compromised residents' nutrition status for four of four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a sanitary environment, prepare, and served food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. The 3-compartment sink did not have an air gap (is vertical space between the end of a pipe and the top of a nearby sink that prevents the backflow of contaminated water). 2. [NAME] debris was observed on the wall next to the milk refrigerator, cook freezer, above the steam table, door frame of the dry storage door and a black fan located next to clean water pitchers. 3. Milk refrigerator and produce refrigerator shelves had chipped paint. 4. Two floor holes observed underneath the ice machine. 5. The inside of two microwaves, one located by the hand wash station and the other next to the three-compartment sink had brown sticky substance. 6. The Dietary aide (DA) had exposed facial hair and [NAME] (CK) 2 had exposed hair during meal preparation. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of infections when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not perform hand hygiene during medication administration to Resident 51. 2. The clean linen room door was left open to the hallway, and the room was unoccupied. 3. The linen cart located in the east hallway containing clean gowns was left open and a crumpled paper tissue was left on the bottom shelf of the cart. 4. The north shower room had washcloth hanging on the soap holder and the handheld shower head was left on the floor. These deficient practices placed residents at risk for cross-contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/23 at 12:15 p.m., with LVN 1 in room [ROOM NUMBER], LVN 1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide written notification before a room change for three of 53 sampled residents (Resident 31, Resident 27, and Resident 307) when the residents were moved to another room without a written notification including the reason for the move provided to residents and responsible representative (an individual chosen to act on behalf of the resident in order to support the resident in decision-making; access medical, social or other personal information of the resident; manage financial matters; or receive notifications). This failure violated the right of Resident 31, Resident 27, and Resident 307 to receive a written notice explaining the reason for the move before the room changed. Findings: During an interview on 11/7/23, at 9:22 a.m. in Resident 31's room, Resident 31 stated, she would like to be in a room with four persons. Resident 31 stated, It's noisy here. During a review of Resident 31's admission Record (AR), dated 11/8/23, the AR indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 53 sampled residents (Resident 27, Resident 8, and Resident 6) when: 1. Resident 27 and Resident 8 did not have a comprehensive care plan for atrial fibrillation (a-fib- an abnormal heartbeat which reduces the heart's ability to pump properly and increases risk of blood clots) and the use of anticoagulation medication (medication that helps prevent blood clot formation). These failures placed Resident 27 and Resident 8 at risk for signs and symptoms of a-fib and bleeding complications from the used of anticoagulant to go unmonitored. 2. Resident 6's weight loss care plan intervention for weekly weights were not done. This failure placed Resident 6 at risk for delayed identification, reporting, and timely management for weight loss. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/8/23 at 11:40 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 27's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nutritional needs for four of four sampled residents (Residents 1, 18, 34, and 309) was met for lunch on 11/7/23 when the meal was not plated in accordance with menu guidance for purred diet portion size for purred meat. This failure had the potential to result in under nutrition further compromising the medical status of Residents 1, 18, 34, and 309 who received pureed meat from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/23 at 9:41 a.m., with [NAME] (CK)1 in the kitchen, CK 1 pour a bowl of dice chicken into blender to make pureed meat. CK 1 stated he weighed the dice chicken and was 6 ounces (oz- a unit of measurement). CK 1 stated he put 6 oz of dice chicken in the blender to make 5 portions of pureed meat for lunch meal. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/7/23 at 3:13 p.m., with the Registered Dietitian (RD), the Cooks Spreadsheet Fall Menus dated 11/7/23 was reviewed. The Cooks Spreadsheet Fall Menus indicated, 1 portion of Lemon Chicken…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for six of six residents (Resident 33, Resident 45, Resident 1, Resident 18, Resident 34, and Resident 309) when: 1. [NAME] 2 served Resident 33 and Resident 45 a regular textured Brussels sprouts for lunch instead of the physician ordered mechanical soft diet (a diet with food texture of chopped and ground designed for residents who have trouble chewing and swallowing). 2. [NAME] 1 served Resident 1, Resident 18, Resident 34, and Resident 309 chunks of chicken for lunch instead of the physician ordered puree diet (a diet with food texture of soft pudding-like consistency). These failures placed Residents at risk for aspiration (accidentally inhaling food or liquid into the lungs) and choking. Findings: 1. During a review on 11/6/23 at 12:00 p.m. of Resident 45 & Resident 33's Meal Tray Ticket (menu based on the resident's diet physician order and food preference), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-09 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, during the survey period of 11/6/23 through 11/9/23, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom accommodated no more than four residents in three of 16 rooms (rooms 11, 12 and 14). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/23 at 9:55 a.m. with Resident 23 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 23 was lying in bed watching television. Resident 23 had a dresser within her curtained area and had personal belongings within reach. Resident 23 stated she had her own area in the room and 8 residents in the room did not affect her privacy. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/07/23 at 10:05 a.m. with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) in rooms 11, 12 and 14, 8 resident beds were observed in each room. The DOM stated the facility needed a waiver if there were more than 4 residents per room. There was adequate closet and storage space observed for each resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Waiver has been granted
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for (19 of 51 residents (1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 18, 24, 25, 29, 31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 46, 51, and 307) when: 1. Two resident shower rooms had black residue on the tile floors and walls, gaps in between the tiles and the call light pull cords had pink and black substance. 2. Oscillating (rotating) fan with a plastic packaging wrapped at the end of the electrical cord was plugged into a four-socket wall and the plastic packaging was touching the outlet. 3. The shower room in the north hallway had darkened areas on the tile grout. These failure placed residents in a unsanitary environment which could lead to potential health problems and created a fire hazard. Findings: 1. During an observation on 11/6/23 at 9:55 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, the shower room had areas of a black substance on the tile and in between the tiles on the floor. The shower walls had areas gap spaces in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-09 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility remained free of pests when two winged bugs were found in a resident's shower. This failure had the potential for bacteria to spread from flies which could cause illness in a medically vulnerable population of residents. Findings: During an observation on 11/6/23, at 9:55 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, the shower room had two black winged bugs on the wall. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/23, at 10:25 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, CNA 5 confirmed the two black winged bugs were on the shower wall. CNA 5 stated the two black winged bugs on the wall were moths. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/23, at 10:27 a.m. with CNA 2 in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, CNA 2 confirmed the two black winged bugs were on the shower wall. CNA 2 stated the two black bugs on the wall were fruit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 6) when Resident 6's Physician order for weekly weights was not done on 7/17/23, 7/24/23, 8/7/23, 8/14/23, 8/21/23, 9/4/23, 9/11/23, 9/18/23, 9/25/23, 10/9/23, 10/16/23, and 10/23/23. This failure resulted in Resident 6 unmonitored weight loss. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/23 at 11:57 a.m. with Resident 6 at the bedside, Resident 6 was lying in bed with the noon meal tray in front of her. Resident 6 took a bite of pasta and stated she likes to eat steak and thought she was in her grandparents' home. During an interview on 11/8/23 at 9:15 a.m. with Resident 6 at Resident 6's bedside. Resident 6 stated her appetite was not good, and she preferred liquid foods for breakfast. During a review of Resident 6's admission Face Sheet (a document containing resident profile information which includes patient identification, past…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of nutrition interventions and recommend interventions to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 6), during which time weight loss continued. These failures resulted in Resident 6 experiencing an unhealthy, unplanned, and undesired severe weight loss of 33 pounds (lb) or 15 percent in six months and a 54 lb weight loss of 22.5 percent in eight months, which placed Resident 6 at risk for further health status decline. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/7/23 at 11:57 a.m. with Resident 6 at the bedside, Resident 6 was lying in bed with the noon meal tray in front of her. Resident 6 took a bite of pasta and stated she likes to eat steak and thought she was in her grandparents' home. During an interview on 11/7/23 at 12:09 p.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 6 had about 25 % meal intake most of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 53 residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 was making loud noise and yell during nighttime and was assess for pain by the License Vocational Nurses (LVNs) using the numerical pain scale (a pain assessment tool in which the resident picks or draw a circle around the number that best describes their pain, 0 no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, and 7-10 severe pain) which was the wrong pain assessment tool because Resident 2's had severe cognitive impairment. This failure resulted in Resident 2's experienced of pain not accurately assess and manage which could have resulted for Resident 2's increased in making loud noise and yelling during nighttime. Findings: During a record review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), dated 11/8/23, the AR indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy and procedure for dialysis (procedure to remove wastes and excess fluids from the body) was followed and professional standards of quality were met when one of three sampled residents (Resident 307) did not have documentation of completed post-dialysis weight assessments on multiple dates. This failure placed Resident 307 at risk for delayed identification, reporting, and management of complications from dialysis. Findings: During a review of Resident 307's admission Record, undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 307 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, diabetes mellitus type 2, fluid overload, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/23 at 9:22 a.m. with Resident 307 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 307 had a sign hanging above his bed which indicated, .no BP (blood pressures), Sticks (blood withdrawals)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded and not available for use when a stool softener was stored and available for use in one of one medication cart. This failure had the potential to result in the administration of expired medication that may have lost their potency and may be ineffective. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/8/23 at 10:05 a.m., with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 identified one bottle of a stool softener medication with an expiration date of 8/2023. LVN 1 stated the expired stool softener medication should have been discarded to avoid giving the expired medications to residents. LVN 1 stated expired medications had the potential to lose its efficacy. During an interview on 11/8/23 at 10:18 a.m., with Registered Nurse (RN) 1, RN 1 stated, . checking the expiration date of medication is important because medication can lose it's efficacy and possibly cause unwanted side effects . During an interview on 11/8/23 at 10:28 a.m., with Director of Nurses (DON),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage under sanitary condition when the facility's trash dumpster was left uncovered and overfilled. This failure had the potential to attract rodents, insects, and flies which could place residents at risk for cross contamination (the process by which bacteria are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object with harmful effect) and foodborne illness (illnesses cause from ingestion contaminated food). Findings: During an observation on 11/6/23 at 8:33 a.m. outside the facility. The facility green recycle dumpster was not fully closed and was overflowing with boxes, tree branches, leaves and landscaping materials. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/6/23 at 8:38 a.m. with the Dietary Service Director (CDM), in front of the green recycle dumpster. The CDM confirmed the facility dumpster was not fully close and was overfilled with boxes, tree branches, leaves and landscaping materials. The CDM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for three of five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) when: 1. Resident 2 did not a have a comprehensive care plan implemented for the used of supplemental oxygen (is the use of oxygen as a medical treatment for patients who have low oxygen in their blood and need more oxygen) with interventions which included replacing the nasal cannula (a lightweight tube placed in the nostrils used to deliver supplemental oxygen to patients) weekly and properly storing the nasal cannula inside a storage bag when not in use. 2. Residents 1 and Resident 3's did not have a comprehensive care plan for the used of nebulizer machine (a device used to turn liquid medication into a mist so it can be breathed directly into the lungs through a face mask) with interventions which included replacing the nebulizer mask (a face mask used to deliver aerosol medications for breathing treatments) weekly and properly storing the nebulizer mask inside a storage bag when not in use.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for three of five sampled resident (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) when: 1. Resident 2' nasal cannula (a lightweight tube placed in the nostrils used to deliver supplemental oxygen to patients) was on the floor without a date per physician order and not stored inside a bag. 2. Residents 1 and Resident 3's nebulizer mask (a face mask used to deliver aerosol medications for breathing treatments) was placed on top of the nightstand without a date and not stored inside a bag. These failures placed Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3 at increased risk for healthcare associated infections (infections patients get while they are receiving health care for another condition) from cross contamination (a process by which bacteria are unintentionally transfer from one person or object). Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/12/23 at 9:17 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 in Resident 2's room, Resident 2's nasal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-20 · tag F0911 — pattern
    Ensure resident rooms hold no more than 4 residents; for new construction after November 28, 2016, rooms hold no more than 2 residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation during the survey period of 2/17/26 through 2/20/26, the facility failed to ensure each bedroom accommodated no more than four residents in 3 of 16 rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]). This failure had the potential for residents to not have reasonable privacy or adequate space.Findings: During the initial tour on 2/20/26 at 10:53 a.m., the following rooms had more than four residents in each bedroom. Although the bedrooms accommodated more than four residents, each room met the particular needs of each resident. There was adequate closet and storage space. Wheelchair and toilet facilities were accessible. There was sufficient room for nursing care and for residents to ambulate. Bedside stands were available for each resident. The health and safety of residents would not be adversely affected by the continuance of this waiver. Room Number Number of Beds11 812 714 8 Recommend waiver continue in effect. _____________________________________HFES Signature Date Request waiver continue in effect.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to JERICHO CARE GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BAYSHIRE CENTRAL VALLEY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2022
CARTER, BENJAMINIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2022
KIRBY, SCOTTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2022
SALOW, DONALDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2022
BADGER, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
BEATREZ, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/10/2006
GROSSMAN, STEPHENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2014
LOPEZ, SEBASTIANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2023
PARROTT, JASONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/30/2023
ROGERS, DONNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
VALLEJO, MICAELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+17.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$179K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 14%Medicare 27%Other / private 60%

This home reported $179K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$410per resident / day
operating cost
$12,459per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$494per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056338. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next