Covenant Post Acute
3408 East Shields Avenue, Fresno, CA 93726 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 121 certified beds · (559) 227-4063 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.0% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 0.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.06 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.90 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 117 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 40.3–62.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.0%CMS range 7.5–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 45.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 90.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 5.1–11.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.17 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 113.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.35 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.32 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-03-27 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility document and Policy and Procedure review, the facility failed to identify and address complications related to an enteral feeding (complete nutrition delivered via a feeding tube directly into the stomach) for one of one sampled residents (Resident 21) when dehydration risk was not care planned and monitored for Resident 21 who received enteral feedings as the sole means of nutrition and fluid. This failure caused dehydration in Resident 21 which could lead to further medical complications including but not limited to confusion, weakness, low blood pressure, kidney problems and in severe incidences, death. Findings: According to the Journal of Nutrients titled, Chronic Dehydration in Nursing Home Residents, dated [DATE], the journal indicated, The adult human body consists of about 60% water, with muscle functioning as the main reservoir of water, but in older adults, this amount is reduced to only around 50% due to reduced muscle mass. Among older adults, dehydration is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician (PHY) was notified promptly of a change in condition for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 sustained a fall on 3/23/26 at 9:00 p.m. and the resident's mental status declined from alert to unresponsive within one hour of the fall. The resident was sent out to the acute care hospital at 10:45 p.m.This failure resulted in Resident 1's delayed transfer to the acute care hospital (ACH) due to the change in mental status and placed the resident at risk of death from delayed treatment. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and cannot properly filter waste and extra fluid from the body), hypertensive heart disease (heart damage caused by long-term, unmanaged high blood pressure),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) were free from physical restraints when Resident 3 had a position change alarm (bed/chair alarm-alerting device intended to monitor a resident's movement that emits an audible loud sound when the resident moves) put in place for staff convenience, without the resident or responsible party's (RP) consent, medical justification or assessment to evaluate the affect the alarm had on the resident. This failure resulted in Resident 3's movement being restricted because the alarm would sound with small movements which made the resident to feel embarrassed and her privacy was violated causing her to lie in the same position for extended periods of time to prevent the alarm from sounding.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/7/26 at 10:16 a.m. with Resident 3, in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was lying in bed flat on her back with discoloration under her right eye. Resident 3 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policy and procedure when Resident 1 had a unwitnessed fall on 3/4/26 that resulted in a hip fracture and required surgical intervention and the facility did not report the injury until 3/18/26 (14 days later) for one of three sampled residents.This failure resulted in a delay in investigating the unwitnessed fall with severe injury and the potential for abuse to go undetected.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 10:55 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1's bed was empty without out linen with a call light sitting on top. CNA 1 stated Resident 1 was not currently in the facility.During an interview on 3/24/26 at 1:17 p.m. with Licensed Vocation Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated, while a CNA was caring for Resident 1's roommate, Resident 1 touched the CNA, and when the CNA checked on Resident 1 she was on the floor. LVN 2 stated she went right away to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a comfortable and homelike environment for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the toilet in her room was not functional, and she had to use a bedside commode (BSC-a portable toilet designed for individuals with limited mobility to use as a toilet in close proximity to their bed) for toileting.This failure resulted in an environment that was not homelike and caused Resident 1 to feel unimportant.During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/5/26 at 8:46 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed, dressed. Resident 1 stated, my toilet has not worked since I got into this room. Resident 1 stated, I can't even use the toilet. Resident 1 stated she had to use a bedside commode in the bathroom when using the restroom instead of the toilet. Resident 1's bathroom was observed, there are two doors, one leading into the room next door and one from Resident 1's room. There was a bedside commode…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was assessed as having physically aggressive behaviors towards other residents and staff, was supposed to be on one on one supervision (1:1-staff provide constant, close oversight for resident needing extra safety due to cognitive issues [problems with mental functions like thinking, learning, memory and judgment], behavioral problems [disruptive patterns of action or conduct] or potential self/other harm) monitoring when out of his room and on 12/23/25 the staff assigned to Resident 1 left the resident unattended in his room and Resident 1 left his room unnoticed.This failure resulted in Resident 1 hitting Resident 2 in the face, causing swelling and a scratch to the upper lip requiring first aid to the left upper lip and had the potential for Resident 2 sustaining significant injuries.During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin (any injury without a reason the injury could have or did occur) in accordance with their abuse policy and procedure (P&P) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was found with discoloration (a different color than normal) around his right eye on 4/12/25 and the injury was not reported to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and adult protective services until 4/14/25. This failure led to the delay of the investigation into the cause of Resident 1 ' s injury to rule out the potential for abuse. Findings: During an interview on 4/30/25 at 1:29 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated Resident 1 had Huntington ' s Disease (causes nerve cells in the brain to decay over time affecting a person ' s movements, thinking ability and mental health) with involuntary body movement (abnormal, random muscle movements) and confused at times. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when one of two facility boiler systems (a device that heats the facility ' s water and/or ventilation system) stopped working and the laundry was washed in temperatures below the minimum water temperatures according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P). This failure placed the 117 residents at risk for cross contamination from laundry not properly washed and sanitized according to the P&P. Findings: During an interview on 3/18/25 at 10:00 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he received a phone call from the Director of Maintenance (DOM) on the morning of 3/18/25 because the boiler to the facility ' s water supply was not working. The ADM stated the Vendor (VDR) came out and replaced the ignition control module (electronic panel that manages the ignition process, ensuring the boiler is lit safely) on the boiler but discovered a gas valve (essential to control the flow of gas to the boiler) had also failed. The VDR did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in a safe operating condition when one of two boiler systems (a device that heats the facility ' s water and/or ventilation system) was not monitored, maintained and failed to operate from 3/15/25 to 3/18/25. This failure resulted in a non-functioning boiler system, unable to heat water throughout the facility including the laundry, kitchen, showers and sink faucets and placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, infectious disease and discomfort. The facility ' s residents were unable to shower for three days, had to eat with disposable flatware and Styrofoam trays, and clothing and linens were washed in subpar (below normal) temperatures according to the facility policy and procedure (P&P). (cross reference F880, F584) Findings: During an interview on 3/18/25 at 10:00 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he received a phone call from the Director of Maintenance (DOM) on the morning of 3/18/25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility ' s boiler system (a system of vessels and tubes, in which water is heated) was not functional, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 gave Resident 1 a bed bath with cold water. This failure violated Resident 1 ' s right to a homelike environment and caused him to feel uncomfortable and chilled during the bed bath. Findings: During an interview on 3/18/25 at 10:00 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM stated he received a phone call from the Director of Maintenance (DOM) on the morning of 3/18/25 because the boiler to the facility ' s water supply was not working. The ADM stated the Vendor (VDR) came out and replaced the ignition control module (electronic panel that manages the ignition process, ensuring the boiler is lit safely) on the boiler but discovered a gas valve (essential to control the flow of gas to the boiler) had also failed. The VDR did not have the gas valve in stock and could not order it until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 4 (Residents #19, #64, #68, and #217) of 28 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Error Correction, revised 09/2010, indicated, The assessment coordinator and/or the interdisciplinary assessment team will follow the established procedures for making corrections to the MDS. The policy revealed, 6. If an error is discovered in a record that has already been accepted by the QIES [Quality Improvement and Evaluation System] ASAP [Assessment Submission and Processing] system, implement procedures for either modification or inactivation of the information in the system within 14 days of the discovery of the error. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #217 on 01/21/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of bacteremia. An admission MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/27/2025, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed and transmitted for 1 (Resident #30) of 2 residents reviewed for discharges. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS [Minimum Data Set] Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised 07/2017, indicated, Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The assessment coordinator or designee is responsible for ensuring that resident assessments are submitted to CMS' [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] QIES [Quality Improvement and Evaluation System] Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) system in accordance with current federal and state guidelines. 2. Timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services - Long term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.1 October 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure reusable resident care equipment was cleaned and disinfected after use and failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) were used for 1 (Resident #64) of 1 resident observed during wound care. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 09/27/2024, specified, Definitions: 'Enhanced barrier precautions' refer to the use of gown and gloves for use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO [multi-drug resistant organism] as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g. [exempli gratia, for example], residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices). The policy revealed the section titled, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines, included, c. Clear signage will be posted on the door or wall outside of the resident room indicating the type of precautions, required personal protective equipment (PPE), and the high-contact resident care activities that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses (LN) administered medications in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 5), when: 1. Resident 5's morning medications were left at the bedside unattended and not administered as prescribed by the physician on 9/16/24. This failure resulted in Resident 5 not receiving the medications as prescribed by the physician, which had the placed Resident 5 at risk for thrombosis (clotting of the blood), embolism (obstruction or blockage in a blood vessel) and had the potential for other facility residents to ingest the medications that were left unattended. 2. One of Two Licensed Nurses failed to lock the medication cart when the cart was out of the nurse ' s sight, according to the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P). This failure had the potential for staff, visitors, or residents to access medications from the unlocked medication cart. Findings: During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was treated with dignity and respect when Resident 1's call light was removed from the wall and taken away from her on 2/20/2024. This failure violated Resident 1's right to have her call light accessible and within reach and resulted in Resident 1 to feel isolated and alone and without the ability to call staff for assistance. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 3/7/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1 had a history of Alzheimer (a brain disease that causes memory loss and other cognitive impairment), Right femur (upper leg bone) fracture (broken bone), Right Artificial Hip Joint (a surgical procedure in which an orthopaedic surgeon removes the diseased parts of the hip joint and replaces them with a new prosthesis), Muscle weakness, and Abnormal gait and mobility (unable to walk in a typical way). During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-11 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its transfer and discharge policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to comply with the legal requirements to provide Resident 1 with sufficient preparation and orientation to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's unsafe discharge and increased likelihood of preventable re-admissions. Findings: During an interview on 9/29/23, at 2:05 p.m., with Resident 1, inside Resident 1's room, Resident 1 stated, On 8/18/23, the Social Services Director (SSD) 1 and Business Manager (BM) came to my room and gave me a copy of the Discharge Notice and they told me that the facility found a Residential Care Facility (RCFE, a homelike environment designed to promote resident independence and self-direction to the greatest extent possible in a residential, non-medical setting.) that is willing to care for me and I will be discharged on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to contain garbage and refuse (nonhazardous solid waste) properly when two out of three dumpsters were found to not have securely closing lids. This failure had the potential to attract rodents, insects and flies and could spread infection which placed residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/21/23, at 10:51 a.m., with Maintenance Supervisor (MS), in the back parking lot near the dumpsters, three dumpsters were observed with two lids atop of each the dumpsters. Two of the three dumpsters had lids that would not close. Two of the three trashcans were observed to have a gaps in the lids where they should be closed. MS stated, there were gaps between the lids on the two dumpsters observed and that a raccoon could potentially get inside the dumpster because of the gaps. During an interview on 3/22/23, at 9:15 a.m., with Housekeeping Supervisor (HS), HS stated the dumpster should have lids that close and the lids should be closed in the middle without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-27 · tag F0849 — widespreadArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its hospice (care that focuses on the quality of life for people who are experiencing an advanced, life-limiting illness) policy and procedures for seven of seven sampled residents (Residents 1, 22, 24, 36, 64, 81, and 367) when: 1. Resident 81 was receiving hospice services without a written physician order. 2. Resident 22 , Resident 367 and Resident 64 were receiving hospice services with unsigned hospice agreement. 3. Hospice personnel caring for residents under hospice services were not provided orientation to the facility's policies and procedures. These failures had the potential to place Residents 1, 22, 24, 36, 64, 81, and 367 at risk of not receiving appropriate medical, physical, psychosocial, and spiritual support to manage symptoms associated with terminal illness. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 3/22/23, at 2:08 p.m., with the Acting Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 81's Physician's Order (PO),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement a comprehensive antibiotic (ATB) stewardship (program designed to reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics and to limit the spread of antibiotic resistance in bacteria) and surveillance program to identify, track, and monitor resident antibiotic use when the facility's ATB stewardship and surveillance program was not conducted for January 2023 and February 2023. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for an adverse effect of antibiotics and/or develop an antibiotic-resistant (not effective to treat infection) organisms from unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotic use. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/27/2023, at 1:32 p.m., with Infection Preventionist (IP) 2, IP 2 stated IP 1 assumed the position two weeks ago. IP 2 stated she is covering for IP 1. IP 2 reviewed the Order Listing Report for the month of January and February 2023. The IP 2 stated, .There are no surveillance line listings for antibiotic use for the month of January and February 2023 . IP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity consistent with enhancing each resident's quality of life for three of 10 sampled residents (Residents 1, 366, and 21) when: 1. Resident 1 and Resident 366's fingernails were long with black and brown matter under the fingernails. 2. Resident 21's lips were dry and crusty and her teeth and tongue were covered with thick yellow and brown substance. These failures resulted in the facility not promoting the rights of Resident 1, 366 and 21 to a dignified and respectful existence and had the potential to compromise their health and well-being. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/22/23, at 9:00 a.m., with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 8, Resident 1 was sitting in her wheelchair outside her room. CNA 8 stated, Resident 1 was a total care and requires assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), including during meals. CNA 8 stated, Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs) assessment accurately reflected the resident's current status for two of five sampled residents (Resident 75 and 59) when: 1. Resident 75's MDS assessment for hearing, speech and vision was not coded accurately. This failure had the potential for Resident 75 not being provided with the necessary care and services to meet her healthcare needs. 2. Resident 59's smoking status was not coded accurately in the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential for Resident 59's smoking safety and identified care needs to go unmet. Findings: 1. During an observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:41 a.m., with Resident 75, inside Resident 75's room, Resident 75 stated, her prescription eyeglasses was missing since yesterday and staff was not able to find her eyeglasses. Resident 75 stated, she uses her prescription eyeglasses for reading and watching…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered baseline care plan within 48 hours of resident admission in the facility for 6 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 60, 80, 81 82, 84, and 107) when: 1. Resident 60 was sent out to general acute care hospital (GACH) on 2/18/23 for a high blood sugar, returned the following day and was sent to the hospital again on 2/23/23 for a swelling and bruising to right elbow as a result of altercation with another resident; care plans were not developed to prevent rehospitalization and keep her safe. This failure had a potential for Resident 60's blood sugar level and right elbow's swelling and bruising to not be monitored. 2. Resident 80 did not have a care plan in place for a critical lab result and received blood transfusion. This failure had a potential for Resident 80 for potential adverse reaction to blood transfusion and laboratory value to not be monitored. 3. Resident 81's care plan for oxygen administration which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan for two of four sampled residents (Resident 13 and 84) when: 1. Resident 13's nutrition care plan was not revised with seven days to include significant weight losses on 12/18/22 or 2/1/23. This failure placed Resident 13 at risk for complications due to care needs not being planned by licensed nurses and the interdisciplinary team to determine if interventions needed to be added, changed or completed. 2. Resident 84's care plan was not revised within seven days to reflect the physician's order for diet and oral intake. This failure had the potential for Resident 84's nutritional needs to go unmet. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 13's medical record (MR) was initiated on 3/22/23. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease when the body's ability to produce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for seven of 12 sampled residents (Residents' 80, 82, 81, 83, 84, 38 and 107) when: 1. Licensed Nurse failed to follow the facility Change in a Resident's condition or status policy and procedure when Licensed Nurse did not conduct change in resident's condition assessment prior to sending Resident 80 out to general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure had the potential for Resident 80's change of condition to not being addressed by the nursing staff which could lead to delay of treatment and/or services. 2. Resident 81 was administered oxygen without following physician's order. This failure resulted in Resident 81 to receive a high dose of oxygen and had the potential to experience oxygen toxicity (a lung damage that happens from breathing too much supplemental oxygen; it can cause coughing and trouble breathing; in severe cases it can even cause death.) which can lead to difficulty in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — patternEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care, services and activities of daily living (ADLs -activities related to personal care: bathing, oral care, brushing hair, shaving) for four out of 11 residents (Residents 32, 59, 71 and 91) when the facility did not routinely provide personal hygiene assistance according to the residents needs and preferences. This failure had the potential to result in oral infections, loss of teeth, body odor and skin irritations and infections. Findings: During a resident council meeting (an organized group of people living in a long-term care facility that meets on a regular basis to discuss concerns, develop suggestions on improving services or resolve differences) on 3/22/23, at 11:05 a.m., Residents 32, 29, 72 and 91 stated they were not receiving routine personal hygiene. During a review of Resident 71's admission Record, undated, the admission record indicated, Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) were provided to maintain good grooming for two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 366) when: 1. Resident 1 and Resident 366's fingernails were long with black and brown matter under the fingernails. This failure resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 366's fingernails not being well groomed and the potential for harboring microorganisms (bacteria, virus, or fungus) or infection. 2. Resident 21's lips were dry and crusty and her teeth and tongue were covered with thick yellow and brown substance. This failure resulted in Resident 21's mouth not being clean and the potential for causing oral pain, harboring microorganisms or infection. 3. Facility staff did not provide personal hygiene to ensure Resident 47's fingernails and toenails were short, even, trimmed, and clean at all times, and staff did not trim Resident 47's long facial hair above her upper lip. This failure to provide necessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accidents and accident hazards as is possible, for one of 12 sampled residents (Resident 47), when: 1. Resident 47 had an unwitnessed fall on 12/9/22, and the facility did not assess Resident 47's risk for falls; did not conduct a change in condition (CIC, a process of evaluation to identify and promptly report and communicate a resident's change of condition to appropriate healthcare personnel), and the interdisciplinary team (IDT, a group of healthcare professionals who work together to assess, develop, implement, and evaluate each resident's treatment plan) did not review or discuss the root cause of Resident 47's fall in order to make recommendations for appropriate resident-centered care plan interventions that could prevent further falls and injuries. This failure resulted in Resident 47 sustaining repeated falls on 2/23/23, 3/19/23, and 3/22/23, Resident 47 experienced pain, bruises and injuries.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the policy and procedure for dialysis (procedure to remove wastes and excess fluids from the body) was followed and professional standards of quality were met for one of four sampled residents (Resident 10) when Resident 10 did not have documentation of completed post-dialysis assessments of access sites (site used for dialysis) and monitoring for complications on multiple dates. This failure placed Resident 10 at risk for delayed detection, reporting, and/or management of complications from the hemodialysis (dialysis done through the blood vessel) access sites. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/22/23, at 9:15 a.m., in Resident 10's room, Resident 10 was observed seated up in bed eating and dressed appropriately for the weather. Resident 10 stated she goes to dialysis in Fresno and she gets picked up by a transport company. During a record review of Resident 10's, admission Record, undated, indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of six sampled residents (Resident 212 and Resident 366) were assessed for bed rail risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) prior to bed rail installation. Facility failed to obtain informed consent (form signed by resident or family explaining the risks of side rail use), physician order with indication for use, and care plan prior to the use of bed rails when Resident 212 and 366 had two raised upper bed rails. This failure had the potential to place Resident 212 and Resident 366 at risk for decreased freedom of movement, entrapment and/or injury. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/21/23, at 9:12 a.m., with Resident 212, in Resident 212's room, Resident 212 was laying in bed with two half bed rails raised up. Resident 212 stated she used the bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: King-Rabetsimba, Nic Surveyor: [NAME], [NAME] Based interview and record review the facility failed to periodically and accurately reconcile controlled substances (CS-medication which can be easily abused and under strict government control) when nursing staff did not ensure accurate controlled substance accountability for two of three resident's CS records (Resident 75 and 211). This failure had the potential for Resident 75 and 211 not to be adequately treated for their pain and had a potential for diversion (used illegally) of controlled substance medication. Findings: During a review of Resident 211's Face Sheet (FS- a documented containing resident's personal information), dated 3/23/23, the FS indicated Resident 211 was , admitted [DATE]. The FS indicated, diagnosis Partial traumatic amputation (at least half the diameter of the injured extremity is severed at level between right hip and knee) .Encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation. During a review of Resident 211's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four sampled residents (Resident 4, 73, 99, 261) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) medications including quetiapine (antipsychotic medication),olanzapine (antipsychotic medication for bipolar disorder, depression, and schizophrenia) and escitalopram(an antidepressant medication for depression, alcoholism, and schizophrenia) when: 1. Resident 73 was administered olanzapine with no resident specific non-pharmacological interventions were implemented prior to and during use of olanzapine, and no annual gradual dose reduction (GDR, tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose of if the dose or medication can be discontinued) was attempted. 2. Resident 99 was administered quetiapine without an appropriate indication and/or clinical justification, no documentation of behaviors to support the use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with current accepted professional standards of practice for a facility of 109 when: 1. Medications for Resident 1, 59, 74, 89, 96, 97, 411, 412 did not have patient identifiers. 2. Two tuberculin (used tuberculosis screening) 1 ml (milliliter- unit of measure) vials were found open, partially used and expired, and one Influenza vaccine (a vaccine that protects against the flu) 5 ml vial did not have an open or discard date. These failures had the potential for medication to be given to the incorrect resident which could cause adverse reactions (harmful, unintended result caused by a medication) and for expired tuberculin and influenza vaccine to be given to residents, decreasing the effectiveness of the tuberculin screening and influenza vaccine. Findings: 1. During an observation and concurrent interview on [DATE], at 2:15 p.m , with Licensed Vocational Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed when: 1) the Fried [NAME] puree recipe for the lunch meal on 3/23/23 for 17 of 110 residents (Residents 1, 4, 13, 20, 22, 24, 42, 43, 50, 64, 68, 70, 77, 82, 366, 367, 368) was not followed. 2) the Stir Fry Vegetables puree recipe for the lunch meal on 3/23/23 for 17 of 110 residents (Residents 1, 4, 13, 20, 22, 24, 42, 43, 50, 64, 68, 70, 77, 82, 366, 367, 368) was not followed. This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the nutritional needs of the residents and further compromising their medical status. Findings: 1) During a review of the facility document titled, Spring Cycle Menus Week 3 Thursday (menu), dated 3/23/23, the menu indicated for the lunch meal on the puree (blend foods to make it easier to swallow) diet the following: .Szechuan Pork .P .Fried [NAME] .P .Stir Fry Vegetables .P #12 .Parsley Sprig .Flakes .Confetti Coleslaw .P- #12 .Tapioca Pudding .Plain Pudding .Milk .#8=1/2 [cup] (c-unit of measurement) .#12=1/3c .#16=1/4c .P=Pureed . During a review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards for food safety guidelines were followed when: 1. The ice machine filter screen was on the floor with paper debris, gloves, and dirt; the filter was covered with off-white dirt residue, the ice machine's interior cover had light pink and off-white to light brown color substance in the interior cover; and one rectangular ice machine swithbox was on top of the counter next to a bowl of cut apples and a tray holding special drinking glasses to be used by residents requiring these special devices. 2. Thirty-two (32) cooking and serving utensils were stored inside a rubber lined wooden drawer that was covered with unidentified black spots, food debris, dirt and moist area. Some of the utensils had caked-in substances on its grooves and/or handles. The drawer emitted a rancid ( ) and bad odor. These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses (illness caused by consuming contaminated food) from the growth of microorganisms (a germ that can only be seen through a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
F813 Based on observation, interview, facility document and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors was followed to ensure safe and sanitary storage, handling, and consumption. This failure had the potential to limit the resident's rights and enjoyment of food brought in by family or visitors. Findings: On 3/22/23 at 10:34 a.m. an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (IP) 1. When asked how the facility handled food brought to the residents from family or visitors, the IP 1 stated if food was brought to the residents from family or visitors, it must be consumed within two hours, or the food would be discarded. On 3/22/23 at 10:52 a.m. a review of the undated facility document titled, Important Rules Regarding Food and Beverages Not Prepared by Facility Staff, and concurrent interview was conducted with Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated the undated document titled Important Rules Regarding Food and Beverage Not Prepared by the Facility Staff was like a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete, accurately documented and readily accessible for four of 12 sampled residents (Residents 107, 108, 211 and 71) when: 1. Resident 107's copy of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form (a legal document that specifies the type of care a resident's treatment and services would like in an emergency life threatening medical situation) was not signed and readily available as part of Resident 107's current medical records. 2. Resident 108's copy of Consent to Treat, Bed Hold Notification and Influenza-Pneumococcal Immunization Consent or Declination Form were not signed and readily available as part of Resident 108's current medical records. 3. Resident 211's copy of Informed Consent was not signed and readily available as part of Resident 211's current medical records. These failures had the potential risk for Residents' 107, 108 and 211's decisions regarding their healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. Two of six sampled residents' (Resident 14 and 81) oxygen concentrator (a device that concentrates the oxygen from the ambient air) were found covered with lint and dust. This failure placed Residents 14 and 81 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare-associated infections. 2. The Maintenance Supervisor (MS) failed to call pest control on 3/21/23 and 3/22/23 when pest were seen in the facility. This failure potentially placed facility residents at an increased risk for foodborne-related illness. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 failed to properly disinfect resident shared blood pressure cuff (a device used to measure blood pressure) prior to and after resident care. This deficient practice had the potential for the development and the spread of infection to all residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/22/23, at 9:34 a.m., in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-27 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in safe operating condition when: 1. The ice machine manufacturer cleaning instructions were not followed, 2. The walk-in refrigerator interior wall was not a cleanable surface, and 3. A food preparation sink was not in proper working order. These failures had the potential to affect the equipment not functioning in the way it was intended which could affect the health status of the residents. 4. One of six sampled residents' (Resident 14) oxygen concentrator was found operating without a filter. This failures placed Residents 14 at an increased risk to develop respiratory and healthcare-associated infections. Findings: 1. On 3/21/23 at 10:08 a.m. an observation of the facility ice machine located in the kitchen and concurrent interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) was conducted. The MS was asked to describe how he cleaned the ice machine. The MS stated he turned the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-27 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents' (Resident 75) personal eyeglasses were not inventoried upon admission. This failure resulted in Resident 75's loss of personal eyeglasses. Findings: During an observation and interview on [DATE], at 10:41 a.m., with Resident 75, inside Resident 75's room, Resident was observed sitting on the edge of her bed and watching TV. Resident 75 stated her prescription eyeglasses was missing since yesterday and staff was not able to find her eyeglasses. Resident stated she use her eyeglasses for reading and watching TV. Resident 75 stated, The eyeglasses meant a lot for me. My husband bought it for me before he died. I want it back. During an interview on [DATE], at 10:39 a.m., with Social Services Director (SSD) 2, SSD 2 stated, Resident 75's missing prescription eyeglasses was reported missing on [DATE]. SSD stated, she was aware Resident 75's prescription eyeglasses were last seen on [DATE]. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-27 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the needs, for one of six sampled residents (Resident 89) when Resident 89, who was identified as needing exercise-focused activities due to morbid (severe) obesity (overweight) related to depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and physical sedentary (way of life characterized by too much sitting, lying in bed, and having little or no physical exercise), was not provided with exercise-focused activities as recommended by the Registered Dietitian (RD, a health professional trained in diet and nutrition to help people improve their health and well-being through healthy diet, good eating habits, and exercises for weight control). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 89 to continue to gain more weight that could interfere with breathing, walking, or in performing basic activities of daily living (ADL); and placed Resident 89 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and manufacturer's guidelines for use, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions when preparing and distributing food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. A bucket containing sanitizing solution used in the kitchen did not meet manufacturers guidelines and 2. Kitchen staff did not wash hands after touching food and prior to plating food in the tray line. These failures had the potential for food preparation and distribution to not occur under sanitary conditions. Findings: 1. On 1/16/19 at 8:30 AM, during a concurrent observation and interview, the Director of Dining Services (DDS) dipped a test strip into a red bucket which contained a cloudy cleaning solution. The DDS swirled the strip in the solution for approximately three seconds. The strip was pale green at the top and bottom and approximately three inches of beige color. She held the strip against the manufacturer's color scale (determines the amount of cleaning solution in the water; recommendation was for the strip to read…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Surveyor: Ovanisyan, Suren Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person centered care plan to establish care needs, interventions and measurable objectives for three of 69 sampled residents (Resident 78 and 302) when: 1. Resident 78 did not have a care plan with measurable goals and interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia (lung infection). 2. Resident 302 did not have a care plan with measurable goals and interventions for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile (C. diff) (infection of the colon-large intestine). 3. Resident 10's care plan for diabetes (abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates resulting in elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine) was not revised to reflect individualized effective interventions or targeted blood sugar values which frequently ranged between 300 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (a unit of measurement) to 400 mg/dL (normal blood sugar level on an empty stomach range between 70 and 99 mg/dL, normal blood sugar…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 69 sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 462) when: 1. Resident 10's physician did not provide, and licensed nurses did not clarify, the blood glucose (sugar) parameters for which to notify and alert the physician after elevated blood sugar values continued for three months. 2. Resident 10's care plan for diabetes (abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates resulting in elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine) was not revised to reflect individualized effective interventions or targeted blood sugar values which frequently ranged between 300 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) (a unit of measurement) to 428 (normal blood sugar level on an empty stomach range between 70 and 99 mg/dL, normal blood sugar level two hours after eating is less than 140 mg/dL). 3. Resident 462's dilantin (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect a person's mental state) drug use when: 1. Psychotropic medications were administered longer than 14 days as a PRN (as needed) designation rather than for a limited time period for one of 69 sampled residents (Resident 29). 2. There was no reduction done as ordered for one of 69 sampled residents (Resident 91) when Resident 91's physician order to reduce the medication Abilify (psychotropic medication) was not followed. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 29 and Resident 91 receipt of medications without the benefit of a physician assessment for the extended need. This failure placed Resident 29 and Resident 91 at potential risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. On 1/22/19 at 10:47 a.m., during a concurrent interview and record review, Social Services Director (SSD) 1 reviewed Resident 29's physician orders dated 1/2019, which indicated, . Alprazolam (medication for anxiety) 0.25 milligrams (mg) (dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards when: 1. Expired medications were found in the medication cart, and in the Automated Dispensing Unit (ADU; a drug storage device used to track drug distribution), 2. Medications that were required to be dated when opened were found in the medication cart opened and undated, 3. Resident's medications from home were found opened and unlabeled in the medication cart, and 4. A medication refrigerator temperature log was not completed. This failure resulted in four of 69 sampled residents, Residents 54, 27, 38, and 78, receiving expired and potentially expired medications; one of 69 sampled residents, Resident 19, not receiving medications as ordered, and multiple residents having the potential of receiving medication stored at incorrect temperatures. All of these failures had the potential to cause ineffective medication treatment. Findings: 1. On 1/17/19 at 9:20 AM, during a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program for four of six sampled residents (Resident 51, Resident 86, Resident 77, and Resident 69) when: 1. Resident 51's nebulizer tubing (drug delivery device used to administer medication in the form of mist inhaled into the lungs through a mouth piece or face mask) was undated. Resident 51's Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (C-pap; forces air into the nasal passages at pressure high enough to overcome obstruction in the airway and stimulate normal breathing) face mask had brownish yellow residue. 2. Resident 86's shared bathroom had an unlabeled urinal; Resident 77 and Resident 69's urinals (portable receptacles used by men for urinating at bedside) were on top of the night stand unlabeled. 3. Medication syringe was found in the medication cart with pink colored liquid residue in the tip. These failures placed Resident 51, Resident 86, Resident 77, and Resident 69 at risk of exposure to healthcare-associated infection. Findings. 1. On 1/16/19 at 9 AM, during an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of 69 sampled residents (Resident 41) when Resident 41's gastrostomy tube (g-tube) (a tube inserted through an incision in the abdomen that delivers nutrition directly to the stomach) was visible while Resident 41 was asleep in the facility's hallway. This practice failed to provide Resident 41 with privacy to ensure dignity and respect which resulted in Resident 41's g-tube to be visible to other residents and visitors in the facility and violated Resident 41's right to keep her nutritional status confidential. Findings: Review of Resident 41's clinical record, titled, Face sheet (a document containing resident profile information) indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included gastrostomy status. On 1/22/19 at 3:06 p.m., during an observation in the facility's hallway, Resident 41 sat in her wheelchair and was asleep. Resident 41's g-tube hung between Resident 41's blouse and pants and was visible to other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards of quality for three of 69 sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 51 and Resident 36) when: 1. Resident 10's physician did not provide, and licensed nurses did not clarify, the blood glucose (sugar) parameters for which to notify and alert the physician after elevated blood sugar values continued for over 30 days. 2. Licensed nurses did not clarify with Resident 51's physician the flow rate for supplemental oxygen (O2) administration and administered supplemental O2 without a complete physicians order. 3. Resident 36's Midrodine (a medication used to treat low blood pressure) was not administered to Resident 36 on 12/18/18 when Resident 36's blood pressure was 81/48 per physician's order and no blood pressure parameter was in place to determine when to administer the Midodrine medication. For Resident 10 this failure resulted in the administration of medication without parameters which could be harmful without the benefit of adequate monitoring and reporting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report medication irregularities for one of 69 sampled residents (Resident 66) when Resident 66 was given a Duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) 40 milligrams (mg- a unit of measurement) from 12/9/18 to 1/22/19 instead of the physician's ordered dose of 30 mg. daily. This failure resulted in Resident 66's receipt of a higher dose of medication than the physician ordered daily from 12/9/18 through 1/22/19 which placed the resident at risk of adverse reactions from the higher dosage. Findings: On 1/22/19 at 10:32 a.m., during an interview, Licensed Nurse (LN) 8 stated she administered Duloxetine to Resident 66 from the medication cart bubble pack (a card containing multiple doses of a medication, separated into individual doses). LN 8 stated she did not remember giving Resident 66 half a capsule of the Duloxetine. LN 8 stated if a physician's order did not match the directions on the bubble pack she should clarify with the physician. LN 8 stated the Duloxetine medication order did not match the directions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report medication irregularities for one of 69 sampled residents (Resident 66) when Resident 66 was given a Duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) 40 milligrams (mg- a unit of measurement) from 12/9/18 to 1/22/19 instead of the physician's order dose of 30 mg. This failure resulted in Resident 66 to receive more than the physican prescribed dose of Duloxetine medication daily from 12/9/18 through 1/22/19 which placed the resident at risk of side effects of a high dose of medication. Findings: On 1/22/19 at 10:32 a.m., during an interview, Licensed Nurse (LN) 8 stated she administered the Duloxetine to Resident 66 from the medication cart bubble pack (a card containing multiple doses of a medication, separated into individual doses). LN 8 stated she did not remember giving Resident 66 half a capsule of the Duloxetine. LN 8 stated if a physician's order did not match the directions on the bubble pack she would clarify with the physician. LN 8 stated the Duloxetine medication order did not match the directions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 69 sampled residents (Resident 66) was free from significant medication error when Resident 66 was given a Duloxetine (an antidepressant medication) 40 milligrams (mg- a unit of measurement) from 12/9/18 to 1/22/19 instead of the physician's ordered dose of 30 mg daily. This failure resulted in Resident 66's receipt of a higher dose of medication than the physician ordered daily from 12/9/18 through 1/22/19 which placed the resident at risk of adverse reactions from the higher dosage. Findings: On 1/22/19 at 10:32 a.m., during an interview, Licensed Nurse (LN) 8 stated she administered Duloxetine to Resident 66 from the medication cart bubble pack (a card containing multiple doses of a medication, separated into individual doses). LN 8 stated she did not remember giving Resident 66 half a capsule of the Duloxetine. LN 8 stated if a physician's order did not match the directions on the bubble pack she should clarify with the physician. LN 8 stated the Duloxetine medication order did not match the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JERICHO CARE GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHT HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 04/09/2021 |
| PAKHDAVOR, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 04/09/2021 |
| WILLIAMS, JULIANNE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 20% | since 04/09/2021 |
| UNGER, JACOB | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 04/09/2021 |
| EPPERSON, LUCILLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/09/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $766K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055996. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.