Cornerstone Care Center
2550 9th Street, Sanger, CA 93657 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (559) 875-6501 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,612 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.7% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.0% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 4.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 10.2% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.68 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.8%CMS range 31.6–57.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.8%CMS range 8.3–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 67.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 2.8–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.35 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 94.1 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.67 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.60 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.37 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.46 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-10 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for one of 28 sampled resident (Resident 75) when Resident 75 who was extremely hard of hearing, was assessed for the use of hearing aid, and was not provided with hearing aid. This failure resulted in Resident 75 not having hearing aid to maintain hearing for communication with staff regarding care needs and treatment, and compromise Resident 75's quality of life. Findings: During an observation on 6/5/24 at 4:36 p.m., in Resident 75's room, Resident 75 was observed lying on right side in his bed watching television. When asked how he was doing, Resident 75 responded, by pointing to his ears and stating he couldn't hear too good in a loud voice. During a review of Resident 75's Hospital Medical Records (HMR) dated, 11/19/22, the HMR indicated Resident 75 was an [AGE] year old male who was extremely hard of hearing. The HMR also indicated during a physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of nine sampled residents (Resident 75) were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medications when: 1. The facility did not attempt or implement resident specific non pharmacological interventions (behavioral intervention not based on medicine) prior to prescribing and administration of alprazolam (an antianxiety medication), Resident 75 was administered alprazolam unnecessarily. 2. The facility did not provide documented clinical rationale for administrating and increasing the dosage of aripiprazole (an antipsychotic mild altering drug to treat mental illness) and quetiapine (antipsychotic medication), and Resident 75 was administered aripiprazole and quetiapine unnecessarily. 3. The facility did not attempt or implement resident specific non pharmacological interventions prior to prescribing and administration of escitalopram (antidepressant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Hcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies and procedures regarding the safe and appropriate prescribing and administering of antipsychotic (used to treat psychosis - conditions that affect the mind, where there had been some loss of contact with reality) medication for four of five residents (Residents 4, 21, 20 and 52) when antipsychotic medications were prescribed and administered prior to determining the appropriate indications for use. The facility did not develop and implement non-pharmacologic (without the use of medications) interventions prior to physicians prescribing the use of anti-psychotic medications. Mental health professionals (psychologists and/or psychiatric providers) were not consistently consulted to accurately diagnose resident mental health illnesses and prior to the use of anti-psychotics. The anti-psychotics, once administered, were not appropriately monitored for negative effects. These failures resulted in the unnecessary use of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-02-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management services consistent with professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 56) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not assess Resident 56's complaints of pain and report of redness, swelling and warmth to left hip area which started in the morning (8 a.m.) of 2/4/22. This failure resulted in Resident 56 experiencing pain and suffering and not being sent out to the hospital for evaluation until the night (11 p.m.) of 2/4/22. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's Change in Condition Evaluation (COCE), dated 2/4/22, the COCE indicated, . Date:2/4/2022 17:40 [5:40 p.m.] . Pain (uncontrolled) . Skin evaluation . Other 16a. Specify other: left leg swelling . Pain evaluation 17. Does the resident have pain? . Yes . Reported to primacy care clinician . 2/4/2022 . 1530 . Recommendation . X-ray . During a review of Resident 56's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive [pertaining to reasoning, memory and judgement] and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document the condition of one of two residents (Resident 2) upon discharge from the facility.This failure resulted in Resident 2's clinical record not containing details of his emergency discharge from the facility and events leading to why he was sent out by ambulance with police also being called to the facility.During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), dated 1/21/26, the AR indicted Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 6/25/25.During a review of Resident 2's Progress Notes (PN), dated 6/25/26, the PN indicated, Resident was very aggressive to CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] during care and hurt CNA wrist. DON [Director of Nursing] witness and called police. Resident was sent out approx. (approximately). 1030 am on gurney via emergency transportation. There were no further PN regarding this event. The PN was written by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1.During a concurrent record review and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a specialized mattress to two of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 4) who required them, due to both residents having significant pressure injuries (a severe wound, involving full-thickness tissue loss where skin, fat, muscle, tendon, or bone is exposed, also known as a pressure ulcer) to their sacrum (tailbone area), and failed to include the intervention of using a specialized mattress in the care plan for Resident 1. These failures had the potential for delayed healing to the pressure injuries, and an increase in the risk of the pressure injuries worsening, including further tissue loss, pain, and infection, to the two residents.During a concurrent interview and record review on 12/30/25, at 11:30 a.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 12/30/25, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1.The food preparation sink's air gap (a vertical space between the end of a pipe and the top of a nearby sink that prevents the backflow of contaminated water) was not appropriate for use in a nursing facility. This failure had the potential for contaminated water to flow back into the sink and result in pathogenic (viruses, bacteria and other types of germs that can cause disease) microorganism (an organism that is so small it can only be viewed under a microscope) growth that could inadvertently (accidentally) be transferred to food and served to 93 residents in the facility, causing foodborne illness. 2. Facility did not follow the thawing process for six packages of ground beef, stored in the refrigerator, with a prepared date of 4/16/25. 3. Two boxes of butter croissants stored in the walk-in pantry, instead of in the freezer These failures had the potential for residents to develop gastrointestinal illness (illness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure, Garbage and Rubbish Disposal for three of three outside trash bins when the garbage was filled over the top of the bin not allowing the lids of the bins to be closed. This failure had the potential to attract animals, insects and pests which could lead to infestation (large number of pests), and the spread of disease. Findings: During an observation on 4/27/25 at 7:45 a.m., behind the facility, in the trash bin storage area, three of three trash bins were observed with the lids sitting on top of cardboard boxes,. plastic and other debris filled above the top of the trash bins. During an interview on 4/27/25 at 2:30 p.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), the CDM stated the trash should not go over the top of the bin, the exposed trash could attract mice or other animals to the area and bring disease to the facility. During an interview on 4/27/25 at 2:42 p.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated that the lids of the trash should not have been open and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent when the facility's medication error rate was 15.38 percent. There were 27 opportunities for errors and four medication errors occurred for three of ten sampled residents (Resident 80, Resident 146, and Resident 294) when: 1. Resident 80's blood glucose (simple sugar - the body's primary source of energy from food) was assessed after Resident 80 began eating lunch and not before meals, according to the prescriber order. 2. Resident 146's blood glucose was assessed after Resident 146 began eating lunch and not before meals, and medication Calphron (medication used to control phosphate levels to keep them from getting too high) was not administered with meals, according to the prescriber orders. 3. Resident 294 was administered medication not in accordance with the prescriber orders. These failures in medication errors for Resident 80, Resident 146, and Resident 294, resulted in placing residents at risk for experiencing adverse side effects without…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and disposal of medication and biologics in accordance with facility policy and procedures when: 1. A partially used Lantus insulin pen (medication used to control high blood sugar) for Resident 17 was discarded in a container labeled, Medications to be destroyed in the medication room. This failure had the potential for a medication error, and increased risk of injury and contamination, by not following facility policy. 2. The red container, Medication to be destroyed, was observed to be overflowing with medication. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access to medications. 3. In the IV (intravenous fluid- fluids given directly into the blood stream) medication cart shared between A and B Wing, two 100 ml (unit of measurement- milliliters) 0.9% Normal Saline (NS- solution of salt dissolved in water, used for hydration) IV bags were observed partially open with manufacturer's overwrap with no date. This failure had the potential of contamination and unsafe administration.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menus were followed when: 1. Two of 10 sampled residents (Resident 50 and Resident 83) received portion sizes that were different from what was prescribed by their Medical Doctor on 4/27/25. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 50 and Resident 83 not meeting their physician's prescribed diet order and their nutritional needs not being met which can result in weight gain or weight loss. 2. Residents on a regular portion diet were served baked chicken portions during the lunch meal on 4/28/25 that were smaller than what was prescribed by their Medical Doctor. This failure had the potential for all residents on a regular portion diet to receive inadequate amounts of protein, potentially leading to weight loss and malnutrition. Findings: 1.During a review of Resident 50's admission Record, (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 4/30/25, the AR indicated Resident 50 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent infections for three of eight sampled residents (Resident 2, Resident 88 and Resident 145) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 4 did not properly disinfect a glucometer (device used to measure blood sugar) used for multiple residents after providing care for Resident 2. This failure had the potential for the development and the spread of infection to all residents who had their blood sugars checked with the glucometer. 2. Staff did not follow enhanced barrier precaution procedures prior to providing care to Resident 88 and Resident 145. This failures had the potential for the development and the spread of infection to all residents and/or staff in the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/25 at 11:50 a.m., with LVN 4 in the C wing, LVN 4 was observed cleaning and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of nine sampled residents (Resident 88) when Resident 88's urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag was not covered and was visible to residents and visitors This failure violated Resident 88's right to dignity and privacy and had the potential to lead to psychological harm. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/25 at 12:24 p.m. in Resident 88's room, Resident 88 was sitting up in bed eating lunch. Resident 88's urinary catheter bag was hanging on the side of the bed uncovered. The urinary bag was visible when entering the room and the bag was filled with yellow urine. Resident 88 stated he had the foley catheter for a while but could not remember how long Resident 88 stated he did not know why staff had the catheter bag uncovered for everyone to see. During a review of Resident 88's, admission Record, (AR-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS-a computerized clinical assessment tool ) Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA-a comprehensive assessment that must be completed when the resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline) within 14 days, for one of five sampled residents (Resident 83) when a significant changed had occurred. This failure had the potential to delay identification and implementation of necessary interventions to address Resident 83's care and support needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 83's admission Record, (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information) dated 4/30/25, the AR indicated Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included multiple fractures of pelvis (break in multiple bones of hip bones), and surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system. During a review of Resident 83's Order Summary Report, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 38 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the required timelines for encoding and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS-evaluation of cognition, care needs and functional abilities) assessments for two of five sampled residents (Resident 44 and Resident 68) when the Minimum Data Set Nurse (MDSN) did not complete or transmit discharge MDS assessment for Resident 44 and Resident 68. This deficient practice resulted in the potential of resident's needs upon discharge going unmet. Findings: During a review of Resident 44's admission Record, (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 5/1/25, the AR indicated, Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included asthma (difficulty breathing) hypertension (high blood pressure) and pain. During a review of Resident 68's admission Record, dated 5/1/25, the AR indicated Resident 68 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included muscle weakness, chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 57) when Resident 57's pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and underlying tissue caused by prolonged pressure) was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 57's care needs not being met and the potential for pressure ulcer to worsen Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/25 at 12:26 p.m. with Resident 57 in his room, Resident 57 was sitting up in bed eating lunch. Resident 57 observed with low air loss mattress (mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure ulcers) and denied any complaints or pain. During a review of Resident 57's admission Record, (AR- a document with personal identifiable and medical information), dated 4/30/25, the AR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with accepted professional standards of quality of care for one of three sampled residents (Resident 147) when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 5 signed Resident 147's electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR-digital version of treatment administered to a resident) indicating Resident 147 was wearing compression stockings on 4/29/25. This failure had the potential for Resident 147 to not receive prescribed care which could result in more serious health conditions. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/29/25 at 1:10p.m. in B wing hallway outside of Resident 147's room, Resident 147 was observed sitting up in wheelchair. Resident 147 was observed wearing non-skid socks and stated he did not remember wearing compression stockings since he was admitted in the facility. During a review of Resident 147's admission Record, (AR-a document with personal identifiable and medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for three of seven sampled residents (Resident 30, Resident 70 and Resident 294) when: 1. Residents 30 and 294 did not receive appropriate monitoring for Vitamin D (a nutrient that the body needs for absorption of calcium). This failure had the potential risk for Resident 30 and Resident 294 to result in toxicity or ineffective dosing from a continued and unmonitored Vitamin D administration. 2. Resident 294 was administered Torsemide (a medication used to help treat fluid retention and swelling) and did not have a diagnosis for fluid retention or swelling, and was administered Sevelamer Carbonate (a medication used to control high blood phosphate levels). Resident 294's record review indicated an active order for Sevelamer Hydrochloride (a medication used to control high blood phosphate levels) for hypocalcemia (low calcium blood levels) and did not have a diagnosis for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide food in accordance to resident preferences for one of six sampled resident (Resident 295) when Resident 295's preference to receive beverages other than milk was not followed. This failure caused resident 295 to be upset regarding the meal he had been provided and had the potential to cause Resident 295 to not receive the full nutritional benefit of his meal. Findings: During a review of Resident 295's, admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 5/1/25, the AR indicated Resident 295 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: diabetes mellitus (A disease which results in too much sugar in the blood) and kidney failure (when the kidneys have been damaged over time resulting in decreased function). During a review of Resident 295's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool which indicates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for two of 16 sampled residents (Residents 15 and 78), when: 1.The wall in Resident 78's bedroom had deep scratches, exposing white chalky building material, and missing paint. This failure resulted in Resident 78 feeling unimportant, and not listened to. 2.The wall in Resident 15's bathroom had an approximate one inch (unit of measure), by one inch hole in the wall. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 15's mental state as well as creating a portal for pests to enter the bathroom. Findings: 1.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/27/25 at 10:26 a.m. with Resident 78 in her room, the wall in her room near her bed had several areas of deep scratches with missing paint and areas of exposed white chalky building material. Resident 78 stated, . if I had more money the nursing home would have fixed the wall . I cannot afford to get a better room . During a review of Resident 78's, Record of Admission (RA), dated 5/1/25, the RA indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure their policy that only English is spoken in resident care areas when three out of six sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 6, and Resident 7) stated they heard staff speak language(s) other than English to each other while in resident care areas. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the rights and dignity of the three affected residents by causing confusion and the residents being uninformed of their total health status, including their medical condition, in a language they can understand. Findings: During an interview on 1/22/25, at 1:55 p.m., with Resident 6, Resident 6 stated staff Will talk in their own native tongue [non-English] right in front of you to each other, when they are in my room. It's confusing to me. I don't know what's going on when I can't understand them. During an interview on 1/22/25, at 2:20 p.m., with Resident 7, Resident 7 stated staff speak non-English languages While in my room some of the time. During an interview on 1/22/25, at 2:55 p.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of accident hazards when: 1. One door at the end of C-Wing hallway (door number one) exiting directly to the exterior of the facility had a working alarm, 2. Sliding door number two that led to an outdoor patio courtyard contained an unlocked gate which opened to the exterior of the facility and did not have a working alarm, and there was no system in place to monitor nine more sliding doors (door number three through 11) that led to the same outdoor patio. These failures had the potential for residents to exit the building via multiple (11) exits without staff knowledge and/or supervision, causing potential harm and injury to those residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/25, at 11:26 a.m., with the Director of Maintenance (DM), the C-Wing exit door was observed. The doorframe had an electronic keypad attached to it. The C-Wing door did not alarm when pushed open, and opened immediately to the outdoors, a small concrete sidewalk, and then a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure two electrical outlets were not overloaded when outlet adapters were used to increase the number of items that could be plugged into them, and when an extension cord was noted plugged into a power strip adapter. These failures violated the facility's policy on Electrical Safety and had the potential to compromise the facility's safety by overloading outlets, potentially causing electrical circuit overload and/or fire. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/25, at 11:37 a.m., with the Director of Maintenance (DM), the reception desk at the front lobby was observed. At the reception desk, a six-outlet adapter (electrical outlet extender) was plugged into a two-outlet receptacle. Three electrical cords were noted plugged into the adapter. The DM stated the six-outlet adapter should be in use. At the rear of the reception area, an orange extension cord was noted plugged into a power strip adapter, providing a nearby Christmas tree with electricity. The DM stated the extension cord…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three shower rooms were clean when the D-Wing Shower room was noted to be unclean. This failure had the potential for residents needing a shower to do so in an area not clean and sanitary. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/25, at 2:30 p.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, the D-Wing shower room was observed. CNA 1 stated she had used this room today to shower a resident. The D-Wing shower room was noted to have a trail of dark spots on the shower floor, leading out into the D-Wing hallway, in a dripping pattern two feet long. The D-Wing shower room door had several dark spots on the interior side of the door, dripping down the doorway. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/3/25, at 2:32 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), the D-Wing shower room was observed. The DON stated, This shower room should be clean. During a review of the facility's undated Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Policy and Procedure on Housekeeping and Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for 10 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16) when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 2 failed to administer medications and fingerstick blood sugar testing as prescribed before meals for Residents 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15 according to physician orders. This failure placed Residents 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,14, and 15 at risk for decreased absorption of the medication, and placed Residents 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 at risk for inaccurate fingerstick blood sugar (amount of glucose [simple sugar-body ' s primary source of energy from food] in your blood) results which had the potential to affect the sliding scale (amount of insulin [a hormone that removes excess sugar from the blood, can be produced by the body or given artificially via medication] administered changes based on a person ' s blood sugar results) insulin dosage. 2. Licensed Vocational…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-10 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the most recent survey results in a place readily accessible to residents and their representatives when the facility survey binder did contain the survey results for the year 2022. This failure had the potential to violate the rights of residents and their representatives to be informed of previous survey results. Findings: During an observation on 6/6/24 at 8:35 a.m. a binder labeled Survey Binder was located in a holder labeled Survey Findings folder on the wall in between the administrator's office and the nurses station. The binder did not contain recertification survey results for the year 2022, which was the facility's last recertification survey. During a concurrent interview and record review on 6/6/24 at 8:40 a.m. with the Administrator (ADM), the Survey Binder was reviewed. The ADM stated, the binder did not have the results of the previous survey done in 2022. The ADM stated the previous survey results should have been in an easily accessible area like in the nurses station. The ADM stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when the food preparation sink did not have an air gap (a vertical space between the end of a pipe and the top of a nearby sink that prevents the backflow of contaminated water). This failure had the potential for contaminated water to flow back into the sink and result in pathogenic (viruses, bacteria and other types of germs that can cause disease) microorganism (an organism that is so small it can only be viewed under a microscope) growth that could inadvertently (accidentally) be transferred to food and served to 93 residents in the facility, causing foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/24 at 9:33 a.m. with Registered Dietician (RD) 1 and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) in the kitchen, there was no air gap (a physical separation between potentially contaminated water and the source of fresh water) underneath the food preparation sink. RD 1 stated there was not a drain under…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment was provided for five of 14 sampled residents (Residents 8, 44, 56, 85 and 96) when: 1. The ceiling in Resident 8, 44, and 56's room had a hole with water stains surrounding it and peeling cracked paint. 2. Resident 85's wall mounted light pull string was in dis-repair and Resident 85 was using a plastic bag to control the light. 3. One light bulb on Resident 96's wall mounted light was not working. These failures resulted in an environment that was not homelike for Residents 8, 44, 56, 85 and 96. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS- resident assessment tool which indicated physical and cognitive abilities), dated 5/28/24, the MDS indicated, a Brief Interview for Metal Status (BIMS- an assessment of cognitive function) score of seven (0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate cognitive impairment, 13-15 no cognitive impairment), indicating Resident 8 had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 44's MDS, dated 5/16/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for six of 21 sampled residents (Residents 18, 40, 44, 22, 55, and 74) when: 1. Resident 18 did not have a care plan for the use of anticoagulant (medication used to prevent blood clot) medication. This failure placed Resident 18 at a potential risk for bleeding which could lead to serious health condition. 2. Resident 40 did not have a care plan for her non-compliance to use proper footwear when ambulating. This failure placed Resident 40 at a potential risk for accidents like falling which could lead to injury like fracture (bone break). 3. A floor mat was not placed on the floor next to Resident 44's bed as indicated in the care plan. This Failure had the potential to cause Resident 44 to be injured during a fall. 4. There were no care plans developed for Resident 22, 55, and 74's prescribed antibiotics. This failure resulted in the Resident 22, 55, and 74 not having a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-10 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide foot care and make necessary podiatry appointments for three of six sampled residents (Residents 6, 64 and 81) when Residents' 6, 64 and 81 had long and thick toenails. This failure placed Residents 6, 64 and 81 at a potential risk for painful, ingrown toenails and infections which could affect Residents 6, 64 and 81's mobility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/24 at 12:40 p.m. in the hallway between the dining room and the nursing station, Resident 6 was observed sitting up in his wheelchair. Resident 61 was wearing slide sandals with open toes with really long toenails, curved downward. Resident 6 stated he did not remember when the foot doctor was in the facility and cut his toenails. Resident 6 stated the toenails did not hurt but it was hard to wear socks because the toenails got caught in the socks. During a review of Resident 6's admission Record, (AR- document containing resident personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services which ensured appropriate administration of medications to meet residents needs and have an adequate system for periodically reconciling controlled drugs (substances that have an accepted medical use and have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence), when: 1. The facility's injectable emergency kit (e-kit) did not have insulin medications available for emergency use for residents. 2. Residents 6 and 9's diclofenac (medication used to reduce pain and stiffness) gel 1% (concentration) were administered without the use of dosing stick provided by manufacturer. 3. The Director of Nursing (DON) did not have an adequate system to periodically reconcile controlled drugs and was unable to reconcile Resident 86's control substance log sheet (log sheet used to record dose, date of administration and nurse administering doses). These failures resulted in Residents 6 and 9 being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were properly labeled and discarded after the expiration date or discontinued date when: 1. In the C wing IV (intravenous- into the vein) medication cart, three 0.9% Normal Saline (mixture of salt and water used to replenish fluid and electrolytes) 100 ml (milliliter- unit of measure) bags in opened manufacturer overwrap packaging were observed without a use by date labeling. 2. In the D wing medication cart, Resident 76's discontinued nystatin cream (medication used to treat fungal infection) 15 GM (gram- unit of measurement) was observed not separated from medications that were in use for facility residents. 3. In the A wing medication cart, Residents 34 and 72's discontinued ondansetron (medication used for nausea) 4 mg (milligram- unit of measurement) medication cards, Resident 80's hydrocodone/acetaminophen (medication for pain) 5-325 mg (milligram- unit of measurement) and lorazepam 0.5 mg medication cards, and Resident 91's discontinued oxycodone/acetaminophen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent infections for 5 of 14 sampled residents (Residents 77, 78, 79, 59, and 95) when: 1. Residents 77, 78 and 79's toilet including toilet seat commode in room [ROOM NUMBER] was soiled and splattered with feces (stool). This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination (bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect) and transmission of infection between residents. 2. Two bags of dirty linens were found on the floor in a resident room. This failure had the potential to result in cross contamination which could lead to more serious health condition. 3. Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) 4 and 5 did not properly disinfect resident shared glucometer (device used to measure blood sugar) for Residents 59 and 95 after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for one of two sampled residents (Resident 52) when Resident 52's urinary catheter (flexible tube inserted into bladder to drain urine) bag was not covered and was visible to residents and visitors to see. This failure had the potential to violate Resident 52's privacy and dignity. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/24 at 9:50 a.m. in Resident 52's room, Resident 52 was sitting up in his wheelchair at bedside with a urinary catheter bag hanging underneath the wheelchair uncovered. The urine bag was visible when entering the room and the bag was filled with yellow urine. Resident 54 stated he needed the urinary catheter because he was not able to void (urinate) but could not remember how long he had the urinary catheter. Resident 54 stated he did not know staff had been hanging the catheter bag without a cover for everyone to see. During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status of one of five sampled residents (Resident 64) when Resident 64's anxiety (feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness) diagnosis was not accurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 64's care needs not met. Findings: During a review of Resident 64's admission Record (document with resident demographic and medical diagnosis information), dated 6/6/24, indicated Resident 64 was admitted in the facility on 10/9/23 with diagnoses which included unspecified psychosis (mental health problem that causes people to perceive or interpret things differently from those around them) and dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning). During a review of Resident 64's, Physician Order, undated, the Physician Order, indicated, .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a mental health diagnosis for 1 of 28 sampled residents (Resident 75) based on standards of practice when Resident 75's medical record was marked with schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder marked by a major mood episode and a break down between thought, emotion, and behavior) as a diagnosis for use of quetiapine (brand name used- an antipsychotic [mind altering] medication used to treat mental disease) and aripiprazole (brand name used, antipsychotic) with no prior history of such diagnosis. This failure resulted in Resident 75 being inappropriately administered aripiprazole and quetiapine, which resulted in adverse events including weight gain. Findings: During an observation on 6/5/24 4:36 p.m., in Resident 75's room, Resident 75 was observed lying on right side in his bed watching television. When asked how he was doing, Resident 75 responded, by pointing to his ears and stating he couldn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess the root cause of behavioral symptoms, develop and implement measurable goals and interventions to address the individualized care plan for 1 of 28 sampled resident (Resident 75), who was diagnosed with dementia (progressive decline in memory that affects the ability to perform everyday activities and interferes with daily functioning). This failure resulted in Resident 75 not receiving the appropriate treatment and services needed to meet his dementia care needs and achieve his highest level of functioning. Findings: During an observation on 6/5/24 4:36 p.m., in Resident 75's room, Resident 75 was observed lying on right side in his bed watching television. When asked how he was doing, Resident 75 responded, by pointing to his ears and stating he couldn't hear too good in a loud voice. During a review of Resident 75's Hospital Medical Records (HMR) dated, 11/19/22, the HMR indicated, History of Present Illness .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 56) when Resident 56 did not have the appropriate monitoring for the use of levetiracetam (medication used to treat seizure disorders). This failure had the potential for Resident 56's levetiracetam level to be elevated and for Resident 56 to be administered levetiracetam unnecessarily. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record (AR), dated 2/7/22, the AR indicated Resident 56 was an [AGE] year old female who was admitted on [DATE] to the facility. During an observation on 6/5/24 at 4:30 p.m., in Resident 56's room, Resident 56 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. Resident 56 did not respond to her name when verbally called out twice. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/6/24 at 8:59 a.m. Resident 56 was observed lying in her bed. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 9 was present in room and translated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for one of three sampled residents (Resident 85), when two cockroaches were found in the Resident 85's bathroom. This failure resulted in an ineffective pest control program with cockroaches found in Resident 85's bathroom. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/3/24 at 3:34 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), in Resident 85's bathroom, two, small brown, insects were observed. The DON stated, the insects were cockroaches. During an interview on 6/3/24 at 3:34 p.m. with the Administrator (ADM), in Resident 85's bathroom, the ADM stated, the pest control vendor that came to the facility was (Pest Control Company Name). During an interview on 6/3/24 at 3:34 p.m. with Resident 85, Resident 85 stated, he had seen cockroaches in the bathroom before. Resident 85 stated, I've stomped on them while I was on the [NAME]. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 9:17 a.m. with Housekeeper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights to formulate an advance directive (legal document that allow one to spell out the decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time) was supported for seven of 19 sampled residents (Residents 6, 13, 44, 54, 61 and 183) when there were no POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment) form in the residents' clinical records. This failures placed Residents 6, 13, 44, 54, 61 and 183 at a potential risk for not having their wishes for end of life care upheld. Findings: During a review of Resident 183's clinical record, the admission Record (AR - a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated [DATE], the AR indicated, . admission Date [DATE] . Resident 183 did not have an advanced directive on file. During a review of Resident 44's clinical record, the AR, dated [DATE], the AR indicated, . admission Date [DATE] . Resident 44 did not have an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 12 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 185, 183, 184, 182, 5, 44, 54, 58, 29, 4, 20, 60) when: 1. There were no care plans for recreational activities for Residents 185, 183, 184, 182, 5, 44, 54, 58, 29. This failure resulted in Residents 185, 183, 184, 182, 5, 44, 54, 58, 29 not meeting their activity preferences and psychosocial needs. 2. There were no care plans for diagnoses of Anxiety (a mental health illness characterized by a sudden feeling of panic and fear, restlessness, and uneasiness) and Depressions (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest); no non-pharmacological interventions care plan; and no measurable goals or timeline for schizophrenia (chronic and severe mental disorder that affects the way a person thinks, acts, expresses emotions, perceives reality, and relates to others) care plan for Resident 4. 3. There was no care plan for Olanzapine (antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to revise and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan for three of 10 sampled residents (Resident 14, 20, 45) when activity care plans were not updated to reflect the residents current goals and preferences. This failure had the potential for residents activity needs to go unmet. Findings: During an observation on 2/7/22, at 11:30 a.m., Resident 20 was observed laying in bed with eyes open. Resident 20 was unable to answer questions. During a review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive [pertaining to reasoning, memory, and judgement] and physical functioning level) assessment dated 12/4/21, indicated, Resident 20's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-screening tool used in the nursing home to assess cognition) assessment score was four out of 15, (0-15 scale [0-6 severe cognitive deficit, 7-12 moderate cognitive deficit, 13-15 no cognitive deficit]) indicating Resident 20 had severe cognitive deficit. During an interview on 2/8/22,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of practice for three of 11 sampled residents (Residents 14, 29 and 52) when: 1. Resident 14's (hydrocodone/acetaminophen brand name [medication used to treat pain]) was administered on 12/3/21 for a pain level of 10/10 ( 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-9 severe pain, 10 excruciating pain on a scale of zero to 10) and acetaminophen (medication used to treat pain) was administered on 1/15/22 for a pain level of 10/10 and Licensed Nurses (LN) did not call the MD (medical doctor) to advise per MD's orders and LN's did not reassess pain within an hour after administering pain medication. 2. Resident 29's (hydrocodone/acetaminophen brand name) was administered on 2/1/22, 1/28/22, and 1/30/22 for a pain level of 10/10 and LN did not call the MD to advise per MD's orders and LN's did not reassess pain within an hour after administering pain medication. These failure placed Resident 14 and Resident 28 at a potential risk of their pain not being relieved. 3. Resident 52's pain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its pharmaceutical policies and procedures for two of two controlled substance records reviewed (for Residents 44 and 20) when nursing staff did not ensure accurate controlled substance (medications which can be easily abused and under strict government control) accountability. This failure had the potential for diversion (used illegally) of controlled substance medications. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/7/22, at 4:14 p.m., with the Infection Preventionist (IP), inside the medication room, the narcotic binder was reviewed and observed to have CII medication (drugs that require additional care or regulations due to the potential of being intentionally or unintentionally abused) filed together with other control and non-controlled medications. IP stated, the control and non-controlled medication manifest (delivery details) were filed together in a binder. IP stated he did not know where the staff kept the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure irregularities in the drug regimen review and resident chart review were addressed for five of six sampled residents (Residents 4, 20, 21, 52 and 60) when: 1. There were no physician-documented resident clinical justification rationale for not conducting the required Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR- tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) recommendation from the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) for Resident 21 and 52. 2. There was no baseline Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS- a side effect of antipsychotic medication) for Residents 4, 20, 21, 52 and 60 when antipsychotic medications were started. 3. Resident 52 did not have a documented monitoring for A1c (blood sugar measurement). These failures resulted in Residents 4, 20, 21, 52 and 60 being administered psychotropic (drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility medication error rate did not exceed five percent or greater when observation of 28 opportunities during the medication pass resulted in six errors. The calculated medication error rate was 19.23 percent. These failures resulted in: 1. Placing Resident 22 at risk for weight gain and increased blood pressure as a result of not taking Furosemide (used to treat in removing extra fluid in the body caused by conditions such as heart failure) and at risk for elevated magnesium blood levels as a result of not taking Magnesium Oxide (used to treat low blood levels of magnesium) at least two hours apart from other medicines. 2. Placing Resident 57 at risk for elevated blood sugar levels as a result of taking an expired Insulin Lispro (used to control high blood sugar) and at risk for elevated potassium blood level and stomach upset as a result of crushing Potassium Chloride Extended Release (used to treat low blood levels of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely store, and label drugs and supplies in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when: 1. There were 28 expired intravenous (IV, given through a vein) medications were not removed from the medication room and were available for administration. This failure placed residents at a potential risk of being given expired IV medications which could compromise the health of residents. 2. One of two medication carts stored two expired medications (Docusate Sodium and Nystatin Powder) and were available for administration, and one medication (Nystatin Powder) was stored in the medication cart with no patient identifier. This failure placed residents at a potential risk of being given expired and unlabeled medications. 3. Resident 188's Budesonide-Formoterol (medication for shortness of breath) inhaler was opened and available for use without an open date label, dispose by date label and patient identifier. This failure placed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents rights to participate in resident groups was supported when Resident Council Meetings (meeting with residents designed to give the opportunity to voice any concerns or grievances about the facility) were not held once a month for two out of four months (December 2021 and January 2022). This failure had the potential for residents to not have an opportunity to voice their concerns and grievances to the facility that could lead to residents needs not being met. Findings: During an interview on 2/8/22, at 10:03 a.m., at a Resident Council Meeting with Residents (Residents 14, 32, 43, 67, 74), Resident 14 stated, a Resident Council Meeting had not been done during the month of December 2021. Resident 14 stated, there was no staff member that made rounds to residents' rooms to ask about concerns or grievances. During a review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes for the months of October to December 2021 and January 2022, there were no meeting minutes for December 2021 and January 2022. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services based on the resident's needs and choices for activities of daily living (ADLs) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 45) when the facility did not assist Resident 45 to get out of bed daily. This failure placed Resident 45 at risk for her abilities in ADL to diminish. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's Face sheet, (FS- a document containing resident profile information), undated, the FS indicated, Resident 45 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included morbid (severe) obesity and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool used to identify resident cognitive and physical functional level) assessment, dated 11/26/21, the MDS indicated, Resident 45's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 (0-15 scale [0-6 severe cognitive deficit, 7-12 moderate cognitive deficit, 13-15 no cognitive deficit]) indicating Resident 15 was cognitively intact. Functional status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-15 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (treatment for people whose kidneys are failing) assessment was completed for one of five sampled resident (Resident 185), when the facility did not perform a post dialysis assessment (contains vital signs and assessment of access site of dialysis catheter [used for connecting to a machine that filters blood during treatment]) on 2/4/22. This failure placed Resident 185 at a potential risk of dialysis complications (low blood pressure, fluid overload, blood clots, muscle cramps, access site infection, itchy skin) to go unnoticed which could lead to harm or death. Findings: During a review of Resident 185's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 2/9/22, the AR indicated, . admission Date 2/2/22 . Diagnosis Information . End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - medical condition in which a person's kidneys stop functioning on a permanent basis and needing long-term dialysis) . During a review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications in their treatment plan for one of 10 sampled residents (Resident 22) when Resident 22 had no appropriate indication and monitoring for the use of magnesium oxide (medication supplement to maintain adequate magnesium in the body). This failure placed Resident 22's at risk of being administered magnesium oxide unnecessarily which could potentially lead to elevated blood magnesium level. Findings: During a review of Resident 22's admission Record (AR), dated 2/7/22, the AR indicated Resident 22 was a [AGE] year old female who was admitted from an acute care hospital on 4/9/18 to the facility with diagnoses which included deficiency of other vitamins. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/7/222, at 2:27 p.m., with LVN 2, Resident 22's Physician Order (PO), dated 5/25/21 was reviewed. The PO indicated, Magnesium Oxide Tablet 400 MG [milligrams - unit of measure] Give 1 tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. Resident 34 was not restricted to staying within the yellow zone (an area designated for suspected COVID-19 [Corona Virus- a contagious serious respiratory infection transmitted from person to person] positive residents). Resident 34 was observed seated at the facility main entrance next to Resident 36 in a green zone (residents without exposure, confirmed negative or recovered COVID 19). These failures had the potential to place residents at increased risk for transmission of COVID-19. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/11/22, at 11:38 a.m., with Receptionist (REC), at the facility's main entrance, Resident 34 and 36 were seated next to each other at the front entrance. REC stated, Resident 34 and 36 were seated next to each other and were not maintaining a 6 foot distance. REC stated, she educated Resident 34 to maintain 6 feet distance. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,612 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,612 — penalty dated 2024-06-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JERICHO CARE GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAYSHIRE CENTRAL VALLEY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 12/01/2022 |
| PARROTT, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/30/2023 |
| BASSI, RAVNEET | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/27/2025 |
| CARTER, BENJAMIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2022 |
| GROSSMAN, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KAUR, MANDIP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2023 |
| KIRBY, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056100. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.