Majestic Mountain Care Center
40131 Highway 49, Oakhurst, CA 93644 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 66 certified beds · (559) 683-2244 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $252,683 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-24)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.9% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.1% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 87.5% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.29 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.10 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 65 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.5%CMS range 33.2–55.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.9–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.0%CMS range 5.5–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.48 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 60.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.481 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.44 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
63 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 47 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) to staff and residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure timely COVID-19 testing of symptomatic staff and residents and the implementation of COVID-19 testing during an outbreak, 2. Ensure staff were wearing proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), 3. Ensure signage was posted of proper PPE for rooms with positive COVID-19 residents, and 4. Ensure staff were fit tested for N-95 respirator masks. The failed practices had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. It was determined the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.80…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2024-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received treatment and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent deterioration for 3 (Residents #15, #5, and #46) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Specifically, the facility failed to: - Accurately and consistently assess and document the appearance, stage, and complete measurements of pressure ulcers at least weekly to facilitate the ability to promptly identify deterioration or track healing progress of pressure ulcers for Residents #15, #46, and #5. - Consult with the physician to obtain appropriate pressure ulcer treatment orders when nursing staff noted a decline or deterioration in Resident #15's pressure ulcers and when a new Stage III pressure ulcer was identified for Resident #15. - Obtain pressure ulcer treatment orders to cover all dates when pressure ulcer treatments were needed for Resident #5. - Ensure wound treatments were consistently provided and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-10-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion (the full movement potential of a joint to flex and extend in any direction) to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had left knee surgery on [DATE] and a knee brace (a medical device worn on the knee to support, correct, or protect the joint for functional improvement) was left on Resident 1's left leg continuously until [DATE]. The facility failed to obtain a physician order for the use of the knee brace, develop an individualized care plan for the use of the knee brace, and did not schedule a follow up orthopedic (a branch of medicine that specializes in the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disorders and injuries of the musculoskeletal system) appointment for Resident 1 until [DATE]. This failure resulted in the development of an equinus contracture (a condition where the ankle is stuck in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident environment remained free from accident hazards and that residents received assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 1) when nursing staff were aware Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)s used a regular wheelchair to transport Resident 1 over an elevated threshold (a strip of wood, metal, or stone forming the bottom of a doorway) to the smoking area, CNA 5 wheeled Resident 1's wheelchair pulling him backwards in order to get Resident 1 over the threshold and tilted, causing Resident 1 to fall back. Nursing staff did not evaluate the hazardous nature of the path of travel or the unsafe technique to tilt the wheelchair. Nursing staff did not consider a physical therapy evaluation for a new wheelchair with anti-tilt bars.These failures resulted in the unsafe practice of transporting Resident 1 which caused an avoidable accident on 7/25/25, Resident 1 struck the back of his head onto the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-09-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to residents for one of five sampled residents, (Resident 1), when Resident 1 suffered a head and neck injury on 7/25/25, nursing staff did not assess Resident 1's pain, administer medications to effectively address the pain in accordance with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy and procedure Pain Management. On 7/25/25, staff tilted Resident 1's wheelchair backward in order to transport Resident 1 to the smoking area and Resident 1 fell backward, striking his head onto the concrete ground. Afterwards, Resident 1 complained of head and neck pain that radiated to the right side and nurses did not effectively treat the pain.These failures resulted in Resident 1 feeling unheard of, experiencing avoidable uncontrolled and unmanaged pain due to delay in assessment and treatment following the fall on 7/25/25.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-07-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 41), when Resident 41 experienced an unplanned weight loss of six pounds (3.4%) in one month (2/1/25-3/1/25), nine pounds (5.3%) in one month (5/1/25-6/1/25), and 23 pounds (13.7%) in five months (2/1/25 - 7/7/25), and interventions to prevent weight loss were not recommended and implemented in a timely manner. In addition, nursing staff did not notify the physician, notify Resident 41's responsible party (RP), schedule an inter-disciplinary team (IDT-a group of professionals from different fields who collaborate to achieve a common goal) meeting to determine the cause of the weight loss in accordance with professional standards of practice and the facility's policy and procedure, Weight Management Policy .These failures had the potential to result in malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition, caused by not having enough to eat, not eating enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when facility staff did not provide supervision for Resident 1 when Resident 1 exited the facility through the back patio door, wandered off the facility perimeter that did not have a fence or barrier dividing the front and back of the facility and was located in a rough terrain area with tall grass, tall bushes, long tree branches, mud and a water hole. This failure had the potential to cause falls and injuries to Resident 1 and other Residents in the facility.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for history of falling, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1, was left unattended in bed lying on his right side by Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) during wound-care treatment (specialized medical management of skin injuries to promote healing and prevent infection) on [DATE], while the right side of his bed had no bedrail in place.This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling from his bed onto the floor causing an avoidable left hip fracture (broken bone) and mild pain.During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:17 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed. Resident 1 was covered with a blanket that notably outlined his bilateral (left and right) above the knee amputations (removal of limbs). Resident 1 stated he had a fall at the facility. Resident 1 stated on the day of the fall, he was receiving care from the LVN and a wound doctor, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Abuse Prevention and Response Policy to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for two of six sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) when:1.Social services was made aware of Resident 1's allegation of sexual abuse and did not investigate or document the incident.This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for further abuse, neglect and emotional harm.2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 left Resident 3 unsupervised outside the facility front door for 15-20 minutes and Resident 3 left the facility.This failure placed Resident 3 at risk for harm due to the facility being located on a busy highway, at risk for falls and injury.Findings:1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure violations involving abuse were reported for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when facility staff did not report an allegation of abuse for Resident 1's report of sexual abuse involving Resident 2 touching her breast without consent.This failure placed Resident 1 safety at risk and there was potential for further abuse.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental processes) and physical functional level assessment] dated 11/26/2025, the MDS indicated, Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS screening tool used to assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice and follow the policy and procedure titled, Nursing Assessment and Management of Residents Following a Fall, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when LVN 1, CNA 1 and CNA 2 observed Resident 1 on 1/16/26 exhibit restless and anxious behavior, exit seeking behavior and wheeling herself into other resident rooms trying to get into their beds. LVN 1 did not assess the situation, did not assess Resident 1 at the time of the behaviors and did not notify the physician to provide instructions on how to address Resident 1. Instead, LVN 1 instructed CNA 1 and CNA 2 to put Resident 1 to bed and Resident 1 was found on the hallway floor outside her room [ROOM NUMBER] minutes later. LVN 1 did not assess Resident 1 following the unwitnessed fall on 1/16/26 and instead instructed CNA 1 and CNA 2 to transfer Resident 1 back to bed. Once Resident 1 was in bed, LVN 1 did not complete a full head to toe assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its transfer and discharge policy and procedure for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility failed to comply with the legal requirements to notify the Resident 1 of the transfer or discharge, the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand, develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focuses on the resident's discharge goals and after the hospitalization, the facility refused to re-admit Resident 1 in accordance with court order. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for loss of safety, homelessness, and delay in care.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its policy and procedure (P&P) titled Charting and Documentation in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility staff did not complete documentation of Resident 1's fall or possible injuries and did not follow up with cervical (neck) x-ray results for three weeks following Resident 1's fall on 7/25/25.This failure resulted in delay in assessment and treatment for Resident 1 due to a potential injury following the fall on 7/25/25.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for fusion of spine cervical region (surgical procedure that joins two or more bones in the neck to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to have qualified, full-time oversite of Food and Nutrition Services. This deficient practice could result in compromising the safety and nutritional status of residents through potential transmission of foodborne illness and decreased quality of food for 55 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 56. Findings: Review of the California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC S 1265.4, a licensed health facility, shall employ a full-time, part-time, or consulting dietitian. A health facility that employs a registered dietitian less than full time, shall also employ a full-time dietetic services supervisor who meets the requirements of subdivision (b) to supervise dietetic service operations. The requirements of subdivision (b) includes:(1) A baccalaureate degree with major studies in food and nutrition, dietetics, or food management and has one year of experience in the dietetic service of a licensed health facility.(2) A graduate of a dietetic technician training program approved by the American Dietetic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure kitchen staff had the appropriate competencies to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service when: 1. [NAME] 2 was not competent in the use of the dish machine and testing the dish machine sanitizer strength. 2. [NAME] 1 was not competent preparing pureed food. 3. [NAME] 1 and the Dietary Supervisor (DS) were not competent in the use of the three-compartment sink (piece of equipment used in professional kitchens for manual dishwashing and consists of three compartments: the first for washing, the second for rinsing, the third for sanitizing). These failures had the potential to result in contamination of resident food and utensils used by residents leading to illness for 55 who received food from the kitchen; This failure also had the potential for residents receiving a pureed diet to consume less food due to decreased palatability and appearance resulting food related medical complications for 8 residents on a physician prescribed pureed diet out of a census of 56. Findings: 1. During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were prepared by methods that conserve flavor, appearance, and at an appetizing temperature when: 1. The temperature of the ham, cauliflower, and sweet potato wedges served for the lunch meal was below 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F-unit of measurement) and barely felt warm in the mouth when sampled. 2. The pureed ham, cauliflower, and sweet potato wedges served for the lunch meal were a thin, runny consistency. 3. The pureed sweet potato wedges were bland. These failures had the potential to result in weight loss and/or further complicate medical status of residents for 55 residents who received food from the kitchen out of a census of 56. Findings:1.During a review of the facility's Diet Spreadsheet dated 2025, indicated, the lunch meals served on 7/21/25 included but was not limited to the following: Regular diet (a balanced, unrestricted meal plan that includes a variety of foods from all major food groups, suitable for individuals without specific dietary needs or restrictions): Honey Glazed Ham,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 47 citations
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served in a safe and sanitary environment when: 1. The dish machine was used without reaching 120 Fahrenheit (F-Unit of measurement) and without sanitizer. 2. The ice machine was not clean and was not cleaned according to the manufacturer's instructions. 3. The three-compartment sink (piece of equipment used in professional kitchens for manual dishwashing and consists of three compartments: the first for washing, the second for rinsing, the third for sanitizing) was used for food preparation and was not clean. 4. Kitchen floors, ceiling panels, walls, doors, and screens were not maintained in good condition. 5. The area underneath the three-compartment sink was not clean. 6. A can-opener and serving trays were not clean. 7. Pastrami deli meat and canned mushrooms were not discarded by the used by date (indicating the last day the product is recommended for use). These failures had the potential to contaminate resident food sources that can cause foodborne illness in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-07-24 · tag F0847 — widespreadInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements were explained to residents in a manner they could understand for 57 of 57 residents when the Admissions Coordinator (AC) did not explain arbitration to newly admitted residents.This failure violated the rights of 57 of 57 residents residing in the facility to be properly informed of the arbitration process and agreement. During an interview on 7/23/25 at 10:54 a.m., with the AC, The AC stated she gave residents the arbitration agreement upon their admission to the facility. The AC stated she did not explain what arbitration was to any resident who were newly admitted . The AC stated she had residents review the agreement with the rest of the admission packet on their own time. The AC stated she did not know what arbitration was and therefore had never explained it to any resident.During an interview on 7/24/25 at 2:44 p.m. with the Administrator in Training (AIT), the AIT stated the AC needed to be familiar with what arbitration was and the facility's arbitration agreement. The AIT stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement adequate measures and a comprehensive water management plan to minimize the risk of Legionella (a harmful bacterium that lives in water systems and areas that are continuously wet) and other pathogens in the building's water system.This failure had the potential to expose 57 of 57 residents to Legionnaires' disease (a disease caused by legionella which affects the lungs) or other opportunistic infections. Findings:During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/23/25 at 2:21 p.m., with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS) the Facilities, Water Management plan, undated, was reviewed. The Water Management plan's sections titled, Description of the Building Water System, Identification of Potential Growth Areas, and Control Measures and Monitoring, were all empty and incomplete. The MS stated no legionella testing was done in 2024, and the facility currently did not have its Water Management plan complete. The MS stated it was important to have a complete water management plan because proper measures and plans for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure essential kitchen equipment was in safe operating condition when: 1. The three-compartment sink (piece of equipment used in professional kitchens for manual dishwashing and consists of three compartments: the first for washing, the second for rinsing, the third for sanitizing) was used for food preparation, did not drain, causing water and debris to back up into the sink. 2. The three-compartment sink was used as a food preparation sink and did not have an air gap (a space between the drain spout and the in-floor drain inlet that prevents contaminated water from flowing back into a clean water supply). 3. The facility did not have drain plugs in order to plug the sinks of the three-compartment sink, so the sink could be used in the way it was intended for ware washing. These failures had the potential to contaminate food sources for 55 residents who received food from the kitchen, causing foodborne illness in a vulnerable population and resulting in severe patient harm or death; this failure also had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, comfortable, homelike environment for four of 19 sampled residents (Resident 12 , 16. 31 and 38) when:1. Resident 12 was not provided with a mattress that was comfortable for him.This failure caused Resident 12 to be uncomfortable and not receive restful sleep.2. Resident 31 and Resident 38's room had two white painted patches approximately the size of 3.5 x 1.5 and 9 x 3 feet on the wall next to the door leading to the corridor.This failure had the potential for Resident 31 and Resident 38 to feel depressed and was not homelike environment.3. Resident 31 and Resident 38 shared restroom that had brown like substance on the seat of the toilet, personal items on the floor and top of the toilet. This failure had the potential for Resident 31 and Resident 38 to have cross-contamination (the physical movement or transfer of harmful bacteria from one person, object or place to another) and a not homelike environment.4. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for one of five sample staff Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 2), when LVN 2 did not had the annual nursing skills training competency completed according to facility's policy and procedure (P&P) Nursing Skills Training and Competency Policy. This failure had the potential for areas of improvement to be identified for LVN 2 which placed all residents at risk for their health and safety.Findings:During an interview and record review on 7/24/2025 at 10:28 a.m. with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated LVN 2 did not have her annual nursing skills training competency check-off list in her personal file. The DSD stated it should have been done annually. The DSD stated it should have been done in 5/2025 and was not sure why it was not done. The DSD stated the annual nursing training skills training competency check-off list was needed to make sure the nurses were competent to care for the residents. The DSD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fortified (foods that have essential nutrients added to them, typically to improve their nutritional value or address nutrient deficiencies) diets were prepared according to facility fortified menu for 6 of 6 residents (Resident 2, 3, 18, 24, 26, and 56). This failure had the potential to result in weight loss and/or further complicate medical status for Resident 2, 3, 18, 24, 26, and 56 who received a prescribed fortified diet out of a of 56 residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/21/25 at 12:08 p.m. with [NAME] 1 in the kitchen, the tray line food service (a food service model where trays are assembled in a linear fashion on a conveyor or table) was observed. [NAME] 1 plated food on resident plates, including a scoop of cooked cauliflower. [NAME] 1 reviewed Resident 1's meal ticket (a printed card or document that specifies a resident's diet order. It includes details such as the resident's name, room number, diet type, allergies, and specific food and beverage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, the rights of residents' individual needs and preferences were provided for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 22), when the call light in Resident 22's room was not fixed and she was not able to return to her room since 6/6/25. This failure resulted in Resident 22 feeling nervous and had the potential for her to be depressed. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 07/22/25 at 1:01 p.m., with Resident 22 in Resident 22's room, Resident 22 was in bed with curtains drawn to separate her from the room. Resident 22 had a television on the dresser with two bags of items on the chair next to the bed. Resident 22 stated she did not like her current room and did not like her roommate. Resident 22 stated her roommate was nice and was evil in certain time. Resident 22 stated her roommate went through her items and she did not like it. Resident 22 stated she had been in the current room for two months. Resident 22 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-24 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete a performance review (a formal assessment of a nurse aide's job performance, covering areas like clinical competence, communication, teamwork, and professionalism, to identify strengths and areas for improvement) of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months for one of two sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) when CNA 2 did not receive nurse aide performance review every 12 months.This failure resulted in CNA 1 not getting their performance evaluated and had the potential for weak areas not to be identified and improved which could affect resident care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 7/24/25 at 10:02 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA2's personal file was reviewed. The DSD stated she was not able to find CNA 2's annual evaluation in her file. The DSD stated CNA 2 was hired on 5/1/24 and her annual evaluation should have been done 5/2025. The DSD stated she was the interim (temporary) DSD and was in a position to perform CNA 2's annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' preferences were honored for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 20) when, Resident 20's meal card (printed ticket or document associated with each resident that details their specific dietary needs, preferences, allergies, adaptive equipment requirements, and even dislikes, ensuring personalized meal delivery and safety) did not have anything listed on his dislikes and the meal card was not updated to include his dislikes for fishes.This failure resulted in Resident 20 feeling unheard when served disliked food and had the potential for weight loss from not eating.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/21/25 at 12:20 p.m., in the dining room, Resident 20 's meal card did not have anything listed on his dislikes. Resident 20 stated he did not like fish and was served fish in the facility. Resident 20 stated he had been in the facility for one year and his meal card was not updated to reflect his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to professional standards of practice for one of six sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was not administered medication metformin (medication used for the treatment of diabetes a condition in which there is too much sugar in the blood), enoxaparin (medication used as a blood thinner to prevent blood clots), and nystatin powder (medication used to treat a fungal infection) according to physician orders due to medication unavailability in the facility. This failure had the potential to result in medication ineffectiveness resulting in blood clots that could have led to stroke (interruption in blood supply to the brain) or death, high blood sugar or uncontrolled blood sugar, and worsening of active fungal infection for Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents at risk for elopement received adequate supervision and monitoring to prevent accidents for one of six sampled residents (Resident 2), when on 6/1/25 Resident 2 left the facility through the front door and walked half a mile to a grocery store. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to result in injury caused by falls due to areas of uneven terrain (land that is not flat, varies in height, may have bumps or holes making it difficult to walk)), motor vehicle accident due to a busy highway located next to the facility, and heat exhaustion due to rise in temperature of over 90 degrees Fahrenheit (unit of measurment) for Resident 2. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 reported a resident-to-resident verbal altercation to licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1 on 2/9/25 and LVN 1 failed to report the incident . This failure resulted in the incident of abuse being reported three days later causing Resident 1 distress when Resident 1 continued to encounter Resident 2 during smoking breaks and was not monitored or separated by the facility staff. This failure exposed Resident 1 to further verbal altercations and emotional distress. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation to ensure residents were free from abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 deliberately cut Resident 1's hair without permission and disregarding Resident 1's personal preference to grow and donate her hair to charity. This failure resulted in emotional distress causing unnecessary mental trauma evidence by Resident 1 feeling angry, sad, betrayed and expressing feelings of being cautious, scared and vigilant in the facility following the incident. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dysphagia (difficulty…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet psychosocial needs according to the policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, for one of four sampled Residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 ' s preference to grow her hair to donate to charity was not documented as part of the plan of care in the care plan. This failure resulted in psychosocial and emotional harm for Resident 1, when her hair was deliberately cut by certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 and stated she was feeling betrayed, angry and sad. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall on 8/6/24 and the facility staff did not complete a change of condition assessment, skin assessment and post fall assessment. This failure resulted in incomplete documentation for Resident 1 and put Resident 1 at risk for falls and potential delay in care. Findings: During an observation on 8/16/24 at 9:58 a.m., Resident 1 was observed lying in bed with eyes closed. Resident was dressed, clean and groomed. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR-a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (disorder of the brain that slowly destroys memory and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — widespreadHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a response and resolution for resident grievances in a timely manner. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Theft/Loss/Complaint/Grievance Policy, indicated, Policy Statement: [Facility name] will promptly resolve all grievances and will provide a copy of this policy to the resident upon request. The policy indicated, A resident or representative will be notified of: A reasonable expected time frame for completing the review of the grievance and The right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance. The policy indicated, A Grievance Official will: Notify resident or representative's RP [responsible party] of results of investigation and corrective action within 7 days of the completion of the investigation. The policy indicated, Written grievance decisions will include: Date the grievance was received; A summary statement of the resident's grievance; A summary of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespreadHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a means for residents to file an anonymous grievance. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents that resided in the facility. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Theft/Loss/Complaint/Grievance Policy indicated, A resident or representative will be notified of: The right to file grievances orally (meaning spoken) or in writing; The right to file grievances anonymously; The contact information of the grievance official with whom a grievance can be filed. The policy also indicated, Anonymous grievances will have written decisions completed as related to a resident and if needed. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 12/20/2018. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, atrial flutter, and major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/09/2024, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were implemented for 3 (Residents #29, #42, and #50) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Consultant Pharmacist Services Provider Requirements, indicated, 1) Reviewing the medication regimen (medication regimen review) of each resident at least monthly, or more frequently under certain conditions, incorporating federally mandated standards of care in addition to other applicable professional standards as outlined in the procedure for medication regimen review (see IIIA1: MEDICATION REGIMEN REVIEW(MONTHLY REPORT)), and documenting the review and findings in the resident's medication record. The policy revealed 10. A written or electronic report of findings and recommendations resulting from the activities as described above is given to the administrator and/or director of nursing (at least monthly). 11. Resident-specific recommendations are documented in the resident's (active record). 1. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%). The facility had 4 errors out of 28 total opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 14.28%, affecting 2 (Resident #61 and Resident #43) of 5 residents observed during medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 5. Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, no staff convenience. Factors that are considered include: a. enhancing optimal therapeutic effect of the medication; b. preventing potential medication or food interactions; and c. honoring resident choices and preferences, consistent with his or her care plan. The policy further specified, 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to notify the physician when new pressure ulcers were identified and when nursing staff noted increased wound measurements or a decline in the condition of pressure ulcers for 2 (Resident #15 and Resident #46) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised in 02/2021, indicated, Our facility promptly notifies the resident, his or her attending physician, and the resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g. [for example], changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc. [et cetera]). The policy also indicated the nurse was to notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there was a, d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. e. need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #15 on 07/28/2022.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments timely for 1 (Resident #21) of 20 sampled residents' whose electronic medical records were reviewed. Findings included: On 08/06/2024 at 12:32 PM, the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) stated the facility used the RAI manual as their policy for MDS assessments. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, revealed, The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. Per the manual The ARD (A2300) must be not more than 92 days after the ARD of the most recent OBRA assessment of any type. The manual specified, -The ARD must be within 92 days after the ARD of the previous OBRA assessment (Quarterly, Admission, SCSA [Significant Change in Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the presence of a serious mental illness per the state Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process for 1 (Resident #15) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: On 08/06/2024 at 12:32 PM, the Director of Clinical Operations (DCO) stated the facility used the RAI manual as their policy for MDS assessments. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2023, indicated A1500: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) included Coding Instructions that specified, -Code 1, yes: if PASRR Level II screening determined that the resident has a serious mental illness and/or ID/DD [intellectual disability/developmental disability] or related condition, and continue to A1510, Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Conditions. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to complete a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment for 1 (Resident #40) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: A California Department of Health Care Services PASRR Information Notice titled, When to initiate a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Reconsideration Request or Resident Review, dated 04/02/2024, indicated, If the Level I Screening indicates suspected SMI [Serious Mental Illness] and/or ID [Intellectual Disabilities]/DD [Developmental Disabilities]/RC [Related Conditions], the individual must be referred for further evaluation (Level II Evaluation). The goal of the Level II Evaluation and subsequent Determination process is to ensure appropriate placement of individuals in the least restrictive setting that best meets their needs and identify the need for specialized services (PASRR Determination). The notice also indicated, SNFs [skilled nursing facilities] must initiate a Resident Review by completing a Level I Screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility document review, and review of a memorandum from the California Department of Health Care Services, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I screening was resubmitted for 1 (Resident #39) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR. Specifically, the facility failed to resubmit a Level I screening to re-open their case when a Level II evaluation could not be completed due to the resident being hospitalized . Findings included: A memorandum from the California Department of Health Care Services, dated 04/02/2024, revealed, Subject: When to initiate a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Reconsideration Request or Resident Review. The memorandum specified, PASRR cases closed as 'Attempt' or 'Unavailable' due to the SNF [skilled nursing facility] not providing the required documentation to the Level II Contractor timely (within 24 hours of a positive Level I Screening) or the unavailability of an individual during the scheduled Level II Evaluation are not considered completed. 'Attempt'…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was updated with fall interventions for 1 (Resident #39) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised in 03/2022, indicated, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The policy indicated, 9. Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. 10. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), not just symptoms or triggers. 11. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 12. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents and hazards for 1 (Resident #39) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent repeat falls for Resident #39. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, revised 03/2018, specified, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. The policy revealed the section titled Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk included 1. The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls and 5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident rights were implemented according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) for call lights and Resident rights for three of four sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3) when Resident 1, Resident 2, and Resident 3's call lights were ignored while CNAs were observed by staff and residents to be using personal cellphones and not providing requested assistance. This failure resulted in Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3 to have feelings of being ignored, loss of dignity and respect from the facility staff and had the potential to cause skin breakdown and falls when requested assistance to use the restroom or changing of soiled briefs was not honored. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/15/24 at 10:52 a.m. with Resident 1, Resident 1 was observed crying while recalling events that transpired in the facility. Resident 1 stated the facility staff were not answering her call lights…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a sexual abuse allegation in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure and state regulations, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 reported alleged sexual abuse to Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 and the allegation was not reported immediately to the State Licensing Agency and Adult Protective Services as required by law. This failure resulted in a delayed investigation of the alleged sexual abuse and placed Resident 1 at risk for physical, emotional, and psychological harm. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing resident ' s information), indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of Resident 1's Diagnosis Report (a document listing resident's diagnoses) dated 04/17/24, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the skilled nursing facility with diagnoses which included, Dementia (progressive or persistent loss of intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure that residents ' abilities in activities of daily living did not diminish for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Resident 1 and Resident 2 did not receive showers as scheduled. These failures resulted in Resident 1 and Resident 2 not having their needs met and feeling like staff did not care. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 9/30/22, the AR indicated, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnosis of Cerebral Infarction (stroke resulting from a blockage in the blood vessels supplying blood to the brain), Muscle weakness, Hemiplegia (complete paralysis (loss of the ability to move and sometimes to feel anything in part or most of the body)) and hemiparesis (weakness of one entire side of the body) affecting left side. During a review of Resident 2 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a mandatory tool used to screen and identify…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one of four sampled staff members (Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1) when the facility did not follow its policy and procedure (P&P) UNIFORM AND DRESS CODE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT and LVN 1 was observed to have long black acrylic (fake) nails on. This failure had the potential to spread germs/infection between residents/staff and placed residents at risk of injury from the nails. Findings: During a concurrent observation and Interview on 9/30/22, at 11 a.m., with LVN 1, LVN 1 was seen with approximately 1-inch-long black nails. LVN 1 stated her nails were acrylic, were at least an inch long and that she knew she should not have them on. LVN 1 stated the nails are an infection issue and no one at the facility has told her anything about removing them. During an interview on 9/30/22, at 11:20 a.m., with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of six sampled residents (Resident 4) when Resident 4 was assessed with a pressure injury (PI -localized damage to the skin as well as underlying soft tissue) on 11/14/22 and a care plan was not developed and implemented to address the PI. Resident 4 was admitted to the Acute Care Hospital (ACH) on 11/24/23 and returned to the facility on [DATE] with an unstageable PI (when the PI depth cannot be determine because the base of the wound is covered by a layer of dead tissue that may be yellow, grey, green, brown, or black) and a care plan identifying effective interventions was not developed and implemented. This failure resulted in not addressing the skin integrity of Resident 4, led to avoidable worsening of the PI and Resident 4 experienced decreased mobility, pain, and suffering. Findings: During a record review Resident 4 ' s admission Record (AR- a document also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect in an environment that promoted and enhanced their self-esteem for one of three sampled residents (Residents 1) when the urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) bag for Resident 1 was uncovered. This failure resulted in Resident 1 feeling embarrassed. Findings: During an observation on 10/12/23, at 9:01 a.m., in Resident 1's room, her urinary catheter bag was filled with urine and was visible to anyone who walked by the room. During an interview on 10/12/23, at 9:04 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she felt embarrassed knowing that her urinary catheter bag was visible to everyone. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS-is a standarized assessment tool that measures health stats in nursing home residents) assessment, dated 9/4/23, the MDS assessment indicated, Resident 1 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- 0-7 severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a resident-centered comprehensive care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Residents 1 did not have a care plan for urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder). This failure placed resident 1 at risk for complications from not having care needs planned by licensed nurses to determine if nursing interventions needed to be added, changed, or completed. Findings: During an observation on 10/12/23 at 9:04 a.m., in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was lying in bed with the catheter bag attached to the bed frame. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR) , dated 9/18/23, the OSR indicated, .[brand name urinary catheter] .for wound management . During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/12/23 at 9:48 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 1's care plans were reviewed. LVN 1 stated there was no care plan developed for the urinary catheter. LVN 1 stated the care plan should have been developed when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program when: 1. One of three sampled residents restrooms (Resident 1's) portable raised toilet seat (equipment goes on top of a toilet bowl to increase its height) had a brown colored smear. 2. One of three sampled residents (Resident 1's) urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) bag was touching the ground. This failure had the potential for cross contamination. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/12/23 at 9:15 a.m. with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 in Resident 1's restroom, a portable raised toilet seat was on the ground and had a brown colored smear inside the seat. CNA 1 stated there was a dirty brown smear on the raised toilet seat. CNA 1 stated the raised toilet seat should been cleaned after each use for infection control. During a concurrent interview and photo review on 10/12/23 at 12:06 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), a photo of the portable raised toilet seat in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Services Provided Meet Professional Standard of Quality for two of 11 Residents, (Resident 9, and Resident 11) when Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) 2 and 6 provided wound care to Residents 9 and 11 without the skills, experience, and knowledge. This failure resulted in CNA 2 and 6 providing wound care to Residents 9 and 11 which had the potential for infection, deterioration, and inaccurate assessment of wounds. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's Minimum Data Set [(MDS- a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental processes)] and physical functional level assessment dated [DATE], the MDS indicated, Resident 3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - screening tool used to assess resident cognitive level) score was 15 out of 15 which indicated Resident was cognitively intact. (Score level: 0-7 indicated severe cognitive impairment - [memory loss, poor decision making-skills] 8-12 moderate cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided for one of 11 sampled residents (Resident 3) when staff failed to provide scheduled showers for 23 days. This failure resulted in Resident 3 not receiving her scheduled showers and placed her at risk for skin breakdown, infections, discomfort, and did not promote cleanliness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/23/23, at 12:35 p.m. with Resident 3, in Resident 3's room, Resident 3 was lying in bed with messy and matted hair. Resident 3 stated, she wanted to take a shower last night because she had not showered in over a week and a half. Resident 3 stated, she felt dirty without showering for so long. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a resident assessment tool used to identify cognitive (mental processes) and physical functional level assessment dated [DATE], the MDS indicated Resident 3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS - screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2019-08-30 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent abbreviated survey document titled, Statement of Deficiencies in a place readily accessible to residents and their representatives. This failure resulted in depriving residents and visitors the opportunity and of their right to view abbreviated survey findings and plans of correction (POC) for the facility. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Administrator (ADM), on 8/26/19, at 10:20 a.m., the Survey Inspection binder was located in a holder on the wall in front of the lobby piano. The binder did not contain any abbreviated survey and any subsequent POCs statement of deficiencies for the facility. The Administrator stated she did not know the abbreviated surveys results and POC were supposed to be made available for review by residents and visitors. She stated abbreviated survey results and POCs were not in the binder and were not made available for review.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment in the kitchen for 62 of 64 sampled residents' when: 1. Brownish liquid was observed leaking from a garbage disposal. 2. Two broken dusty meal carts were stored in the kitchen. 3. Vent screen on the ice machine was covered with dust. 4. Ice machine had an orange substance on the ice machine water distributor. These failures resulted in an unsanitary environment and had the potential to cause food contamination for the 62 Residents that received meals from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation in the dining room on 8/26/19, at 8:35 a.m., a brownish liquid was observed leaking from a garbage disposal into a basin placed on the floor. The basin was full with brownish water in the dish washing area. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated the leak had begun approximately two weeks ago. The DS stated the dietary staff had forgotten to discard the brownish water and empty the basin. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program when: 1. Six of eight sampled residents (Resident's 415, 48, 16, 414, 42, and 3's) oxygen tubing were not dated and appropriately stored to prevent cross contamination. 2. Spoiled tomatoes were stored in the refrigerator, a tub of ice cream was dripping in the freezer, one bag of noodles in the pantry were expired. 3. One of three sampled residents (Resident 49's) urinary catheter (a tube placed in the body to drain and collect urine from the bladder) bag was touching the ground. These failures had the potential for cross contamination (transfer of germs) and spread of infection. Findings: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 8/26/19 at 10:30 a.m., Resident 415's a Nebulizer (a portable medical device used to deliver medication) sat on the top of the bed side stand with a used Nebulizer mask (oxygen tubing that allows the patient to breathe the aerosol mist [medication] in through the nose and mouth to treat the passageways and the lungs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-30 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy and confidentiality of residents personal and medical information for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 51 and Resident 28), when Registered Nurse (RN) 1 left the Medication Administration Record (MAR) open and easily visible in the hallway with Resident 51 and Resident 28's personal and medical information exposed and visible to other residents, staff and visitors passing by. This failure had the potential to result in the unauthorized access to Resident 51 and Resident 28's personal and medical information and violated Resident 51 and Resident 28's rights to confidentiality. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 8/26/19, at 11:40 a.m., in the west hallway, the medication cart faced the hallway unattended with Resident 51's MAR visible to staff, residents and visitors passing by. The MAR displayed Resident 51's name, room number, date of birth , admission date, gender, height, weight, medical record number, allergies, medical diagnoses, and prescribed medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable homelike environment for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 27) when Resident 27's dresser had visible dust. This failure resulted in an unclean and uncomfortable environment for Resident 27. Finding: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 27 on 8/26/19, at 10:30 a.m., during an initial environmental tour in Resident 27's room, Resident 27's dresser had visible dust on top of the dresser. Resident 27 stated, It's dusty on top . It needs to be cleaned. During an interview with House Keeping Supervisor (HKS) 1, on 8/26/19, at 10:35 a.m., HKS 1 stated dusting was supposed to be done every day. HKS 1 stated Resident 27's dresser should have been dusted. HKS 1 stated, I guess we missed cleaning it [dresser]. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Housekeeping- Resident Rooms dated 9/2016 indicated, . Purpose. To promote the quality of life by providing clean and sanitary living spaces. Policy. The housekeeping Department coordinates…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based an interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 47) when a care plan for Resident 47's anti-coagulant (blood thinner) medication was not developed. This failure placed Resident 47 at risk of not receiving appropriate, consistent, and individualized care and monitoring interventions to ensure adverse affects of the blood thinner such as excessive bleeding were identified. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), on 8/28/19, at 8:26 a.m., she reviewed Resident 47's physician's ordersThe ADON stated Resident 47 had a physician order for apixaban (medication used to prevent blood clots) with a start date 12/9/14 for a diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT - a blood clot in a deep vein). The ADON reviewed Resident 47's care plans and stated Resident 47 did not have a care plan for the use of the blood thinner. The ADON stated Resident 47 should have had a care plan developed for the use of apixaban and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for two of five sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 3) when: 1. Registered Nurse (RN 1) used an inappropriate medication administration technique while using an insulin pen (a device used to inject insulin [hormone- regulatory substance made by the body to control blood sugar production]) during a medication pass observation for Resident 33. This failure placed resident 33 at risk for dosing errors and had the potential for adverse effects such as hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). 2. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) pulled Resident 3's controlled medication (medications that can cause physical and mental dependence) before its scheduled time and stored the controlled medication in a clear pill crusher pouch (a pouch which safely contains pills during crushing process). This failure had the potential for resident 3 to receive the wrong medication which could have led to harmful side effects. Findings: 1. During a medication pass observation on 8/27/19, at 11:26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months was completed for two of 15 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) CNA 2 and CNA 3. These failures had the potential for residents' needs to go unmet by CNAs' whose competence had not been determined through annual performance reviews. Findings: During a concurrent interview and employee record review with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), on 8/28/19, at 8:02 a.m., the DSD reviewed annual competency evaluations completed for the year of 2019. The DSD stated CNA 2, and CNA 3 did not have annual performance reviews. The DSD stated the performance evaluations should have been done within 90 days after hire, then once a year, and then yearly. The DSD stated she did not know how she missed completing the evaluation for CNA 2 and CNA 3. The DSD stated, I guess, I just missed them.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) Psychotropic drugs (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) were time limited to 14 days for two of four sampled residents (Resident 14 and Resident 15) when: 1. PRN Lorazepam (medication to treat anxiety) was prescribed Resident 14 since 3/19/19 without a 14 day time limited date and without the attending physicians' document rationale to extend the PRN Lorazepam prescription beyond the 14-day time limit. 2. PRN Lorazepam was prescribed for Resident 15 since 5/3/19, without a 14 day time limited date and without the attending physicians' document rationale to extend the PRN Lorazepam prescription beyond the 14-day time limit. This failure placed Resident 14 and Resident 15's health and safety at risk due to the continuous administration of the unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings: 1. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 14, the Physicians Orders, indicated, Lorazepam 2MG/ML [milligrams/milliliter - unit of dose] may give 0.25ml…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-30 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to the maintain garbage disposal and ice machine equipment in safe operating condition when: 1. Brownish liquid was observed leaking from a garbage disposal onto a pan on the kitchen floor. 2. The Vent screen on the ice machine was covered with dust. 3. The Ice machine had an orange substance on the ice machine water distributor. These failures resulted in an unsanitary environment and had the potential to cause food contamination for the 62 Residents that received meals and ice from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an observation in the dining room on 8/26/19, at 8:35 a.m., a brownish liquid was observed leaking from a garbage disposal into a basin placed on the floor. The basin was full with brownish water in the dish washing area. The Dietary Supervisor (DS) stated the leak had begun approximately two weeks ago. The DS stated the dietary staff had forgotten to discard the brownish water and empty the basin. During a concurrent observation and interview with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), on 8/27/19, at 2:31…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$252,683 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $160,666 — penalty dated 2025-07-24
- $92,017 — penalty dated 2024-08-07
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-08-22 for 102 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-06 for 38 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to JERICHO CARE GROUP — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAYSHIRE CENTRAL VALLEY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 05/01/2024 |
| PARROTT, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2023 |
| CARTER, BENJAMIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| COLEMAN, CHAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2023 |
| GROSSMAN, STEPHEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/30/2023 |
| KIRBY, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2024 |
| SALOW, DONALD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $353K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555115. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.