No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Golden Heights Healthcare

35 Escuela Drive, Daly City, CA 94015 · For profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (650) 755-9515 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (650) 755-9515 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
99 Escuela Dr, Daly City, CA 94015, US
Pharmacy
11 Saint Francis Sq · (650) 758-1320 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
california 54 street
Park
131 Westmoor Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1474 Southgate Ave

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.6%10.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.3%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.5%9.8%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.2%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.5%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.2%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.8%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.2%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.5%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.5%11.2%12.0%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

44.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF44.5%CMS range 34.5–54.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.5–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified68.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 3.9–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.73
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.83
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.61
RN hoursweekends
35.5%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 97.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.61 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-26)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-07-24)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor two (Residents 1 and Resident 2 ) of 12 sample residents for signs and symptoms of emotional harm after alleged abuse.This failure had the potential for lack of and/or delayed provision of emotional support for Residents 1 and 2.Findings:Review of a facility's document titled REPORT OF SUSPECTED DEPENDENT ADUTL/ELDER ABUSE, dated 06/10/2025, indicated Resident 1 .delivered a letter to the Administrator .alleging abuse on the part of her CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) .During a concurrent interview and record review on 07/23/2025 at 2:10 PM with the DON (Director of Nursing), DON stated her expectations were that nurses would monitor victims of alleged abuse every shift for 72 hours. The DON stated even if the allegations were not substantiated, staff were still expected to monitor these alleged victims for evidence of emotional harm such as: Mood changes (sad, tearful, depressed, anxious etc.), whether the resident feel safe/threatened. The DON searched Resident 1's medical records regarding the allegation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have correct and complete information on the POLST forms for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). Acting on incomplete or erroneous information on a POLST form could contribute to a resident's death. In order for a POLST form to be valid in California it must be signed and dated by a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician's assistant, and the patient or the patient's legally recognized health care decision maker. [California Emergency Medical Services Authority, DNR, POLST and Medallion Information, https:// emsa.ca.gov/dnr_and_polst_forms/ accessed on [DATE]]. Resident 1's POLST form was not signed or dated with anyone's signature or any dates. When Resident 1 was admitted to the skilled nursing facility, her physician's orders indicated she was a full code. This meant all measures including CPR would be initiated should she stop breathing or her heart stopped beating. There were no later orders changing this full code status. Three days…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into an allegation of abuse for Resident 1, one of one sample resident. Review of the facility ' s investigation indicated only staff were interviewed regarding this allegation. Facility stated no residents were interviewed because all residents of interest were non-interviewable. The investigation was not thorough because the facility failed to: 1. Attempt to interview responsible parties of non-interviewable residents 2. Conduct assessments of non-interviewable residents for signs and symptoms of abuse (defensive bruising, bruising in private areas, change in social behavior etc.). The lack of a thorough investigation did not ensure all residents were protected from abuse. Findings: During an interview on 05/21/2025 at 11:40 AM, the Administrator was made aware of an allegation of abuse by Resident 1. The Administrator stated he would look into the allegation. On 06/02/2025 at 1:24 PM, the Administrator was asked to provide all documents, including raw data, related to his investigation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately record the discard date on the label for a potentially hazardous food (thawed chicken breast) stored in 1 of 3 refrigerators and failed to conduct temperature monitoring prior to placing a potentially hazardous cold food (chocolate mousse) on residents' meal trays that was identified prior to the tray line service with a temperature of 47.3 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure had the potential to affect 88 of 88 residents who received meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Food Preparation and Service, indicated, Food and nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. The policy revealed the section titled, Policy Interpretation and Implementation included 2. 'Potentially Hazardous Food' (PHF) or 'Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) Food' means food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff conducted finger-stick blood sugar (FSBS) checks in accordance with physician's orders for 1 (Resident #33) of 3 residents observed for blood sugar monitoring. Specifically, staff failed to perform Resident #33's FSBS before meals as specified by the physician. Findings included: An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #33 on 06/07/2024 and most recently admitted the resident on 08/21/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type two diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease. Resident #33's Care Plan Report included a focus area, initiated on 08/01/2024, that indicated the resident was at risk for hyperglycemia (high blood sugar levels) or hypoglycemia (low blood sugar levels). An intervention dated 08/01/2024 directed staff to complete FSBS checks as ordered and as needed. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 02/20/2025, revealed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a safe and secure manner for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #27) of 2 residents observed with medications at their bedside. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised 04/2007, revealed, The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe secure and orderly manner. The policy revealed the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation included 2. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. A facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, revised 11/2022, revealed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. The policy revealed the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation included 3. If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not document the administration of medications after the resident refused to take them for 1 (Resident #27) of 1 resident reviewed for refusal of medications. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 12/2012, indicated, 18. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall initial and circle the MAR space provided for that drug and dose. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #27 on 02/24/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of dependence on renal dialysis. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/02/2025, revealed Resident #33 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #27's Order Summary Report contained an active order, dated 02/24/2025, for docusate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) received care in accordance with professional standards of practice when there was no evidence of nursing notes and vital signs by night shift nurse on 6/14/24 for Resident 1. This failure had the potential to delay identifying symptoms of atrial fibrillation (Afib, an irregular and often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow and can increase the risk of stroke) for Resident 1. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation, hypertension (high blood pressure), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, an enlarged prostate), and diabetes (high blood sugar). Resident 1 had a history of transient ischemic attack (TIA, known as a mini stroke which is a temporary disruption in the blood supply to part of the brain). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, resident assessment tool), dated 6/13/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered in a timely manner for five of six residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6). The resident responsible party and confidential interview reported a pattern of delayed response to call lights and waiting for a long period of time for staff assistance. Additionally, there was no policy and procedure in place for the use of call light. These failures resulted in delayed provision of care and services for Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6; and had the potential to negatively impact the resident ' s physical, mental, and emotional well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated, was admitted to facility on 8/25/20 with diagnosis including lung disease, heart disease, borderline personality disorder (a mental illness that severely impact a person ' s ability to manage their emotions), major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide protection to Resident 1 and other residents when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was not suspended immediately after an alleged abuse to Resident 1 was reported on 1/13/24. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for further abuse and placed the other 15 residents assigned to CNA 1 for potential abuse. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (impairment in the ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic swelling and tenderness of joints and other parts of the body), and osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break down over time). Review of Resident 1 ' s physician ' s Progress Notes, dated 12/12/23 at 5:49 PM indicated, NGT (nasogastric tube - a feeding tube that goes through the nose, down the throat, and into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the knowledge and competency to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) failed to recognize inappropriate use of restraint after observing Resident 1's hand was tied to her bed; and 2. Two nursing staff (Licensed Vocational Nurse [LVN] and CNA) were unaware that they could report instances or allegations of abuse to the state agency (which is CDPH - California Department of Public Health) and the local Ombudsman's Office. These resulted in failure to recognize a situation that could indicate abuse and placed the residents' safety at risk. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (impairment in the ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from the use of physical restraint (any device, equipment or material that cannot be easily removed by the resident and limits his/her freedom of movement or normal access to his/her body) for discipline purposes and staff convenience when CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 1 placed a mitten on Resident 1's right hand and tied her right hand to her bed. This failure had the potential to cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that include dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), dementia (impairment in the ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), rheumatoid arthritis (chronic swelling and tenderness of joints and other parts of the body), and osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease, in which the tissues in the joint break…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the local Ombudsman within the required two-hour period for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) 1 placed a mitten on Resident 1's right hand and tied her right hand to her bed. This failure had the potential to cause delay in the abuse investigation and increased risk of harm to the residents by placing Resident 1 at risk for potential repeated abuse, and other residents at risk for potential abuse. Findings: Review of the facility's Event Investigation Summary (EIS), dated 1/24/24, indicated that Resident 1 was found by staff to have her right hand bound with a mitten, surgical gloves, plastic bag and loosely secured to the side rail of her bed to prevent the resident from pulling her Nasogastric Tube (NGT - a feeding tube that goes through the nose, down the throat, and into the stomach to deliver formula or medicine)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its infection control and prevention practices during a COVID-19 (an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus) outbreak when: 1. The Licensed Nurse 1 (LN1) did not wash hands before wearing gloves and before entering the room of four residents, Resident 1 (R1), Resident 2 (R2), Resident 3 (R3) and Resident 4 (R4), who were on transmission-based precautions (TBP - used in addition to standard precautions for patients who are known or suspected infections with pathogens that can be transported by airborne, droplet, or contact routes). 2. The LN1 did not remove the surgical mask and put on an N95 respirator (a respiratory protective device designed to protect against particulate matter such as dust, fumes, mists, aerosols, and smoke particulates) and face shield (to protect eyes, nose, mouth and face from flying objects and liquids) before entering the room of four residents, R1, R2, R3, and R4, who were on TBP. 3. The door of the room of four residents, R1, R2, R3, and R4 was left wide open…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral monitoring for one of three residents reviewed. (Resident 1) This failure had resulted to Resident 1 had eloped from the facility on 7/03/23 sustained mid nose abrasion and then was sent to acute hospital for evaluation. Findings: During record review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (heart cannot supply enough blood for the body), dementia (memory loss), metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction due to metabolism). Review of Resident 1 ' s care plan dated 6/12/23 addressing falls indicated Monitor every two hours Review of Resident 1's treatment administration record dated 6/2023, indicated there was no evidence of documentation Resident 1 was monitored every two hours. Interview with director of nursing (DON) on 9/01/23, at 2:45 pm, DON acknowledged that there was lack of documentation that Resident 1 was monitored every two hours. During interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food prepared in a form designed to meet resident's individual needs for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 2). This failure had the potential to result to Resident 1's choking accident. Findings: During review of Resident 2's clinical record, indicated, Resident 2 was admitted with diagnoses included dementia (memory loss), anxiety (feeling of fear) and dysphagia (difficulty of swallowing). During an interview with registered nurse 2 (RN 2) on 8/08/2023 at 2:37 PM, RN 2 stated that there were times facility staff were not serving the appropriate meal because it was not matched to the meal ticket. Sometimes the physician changes the diet order after hours however the dietary supervisor do not update on their system. During review of the speech therapist note dated 3/24/2023, indicated discharge recommendations, Diet- Mechanical Soft textures, Thin liquids To facilitate safety and efficiency, it is recommended the patient use the following strategies and/or maneuvers during oral intake: general swallow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on food preparation observations, dietary management staff interview and departmental document review, the facility failed to ensure correct portioning for greater than 90 residents when the dessert for the noon meal was not prepared using the proper scoop size. Consistently providing incorrect food portions may result in over or undernutrition further compromising medical status. Findings: During general food production observations on 07/17/23 at 09:17 AM, Dietary Staff 1 was portioning butterscotch pudding, the noon dessert, into individual bowls using a scoop with an ivory handle. In a follow up observation and interview, in the dish room, on 07/17/23 at 10:20 AM, with the Director of Food Services (DFS) it was noted there was a clean/sanitized ivory scoop drying on the wire rack. The DFS identified the scoop size as a #10, which equated to a serving size of 3 ounces. Review of facility document titled Daily Spreadsheet dated 07/17/23 guided staff to utilize a #8 scoop, which would have equated to 4 ounces of dessert.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-24 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on meal distribution observation, interview and departamental record review, the facility failed to ensure resident meals were palatable when residents complained about the taste and temperature of served meals. Findings: 1. During the Resident Council Meeting on 7/18/23 at 2:00 PM in the dining room, there were eight residents present. Observed all residents were verbal, but only six were actively participating. During interview on question number 12, (Do you receive snack at bedtime ) Resident 74 stated, today, I complained the first time. The food was cold. Did you get the pizza? Resident 51 responded, today was the worst food. Pizza? If that's what you call it Resident 4 stated, sometimes the food comes in late, especially breakfast. Lunch almost quarter to 1. Their food is very good except today. Today, I have cold scrambled egg. Resident 74 stated, they have a problem in the kitchen. The dishwasher is broken. We get plastic fork and disposable plates. My doctor ordered milk, I was told 'will get it for you, but I didn't. I'm a diabetic. I have milk for midnight snack. I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility interdisciplinary team failed to complete a self-administration of medications assessments for three of three sampled residents (Residents 39, 10, and 68) when: 1. A bottle of cough medicine was in plain sight on the overbed table next to the resident's bed, a bottle of vitamin D and other numerous medication bottles was at the foot of the bed of Resident 39; 2. A bottle of vitamin D, a bottle of trubiotic (supplement used for healthy stomach and bowels), was in plain sight in the open bedside cabinet, and an albuterol inhaler and 2 bottles of vitamin c was on the overbed table of Resident 10; 3. A bottle of olapatadine eye drops (used for treatment of itchy eyes), a bottle of pataday eye drops (used for relief of itchy eyes), a tube of diclofenac (used for relief of pain), a bottle of fluocinolone (used to treat skin conditions), and a tube of aspercreme (used for relief of pain) was in the open bedside drawer of Resident 68. This failure had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 1) was provided with reasonable accommodation when the resident's request to fix the uneven arm rest of his power wheelchair was not followed through by the staff. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of life and may place resident at risk of harm. Findings: Review of the admission Record, dated 7/20/23 indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission History and Physical, dated 6/21/23 indicated, Resident 1 was discharged form an acute care hospital to the facility, with a history of bilateral above knee amputation (AKA, removal of both legs above the knee) status post motor vehicular accident in 1987, was wheelchair bound, neurogenic bladder (lack bladder control) with suprapubic catheter (drainage tube into the urinary bladder) and sacral wound, admitted for wound care. In an observation and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan (BCP) for one of three sampled resident (Resident 92) when there was no evidence of documentation of a completed baseline care plan. A BCP includes minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident-specific health and safety concerns to prevent decline, injury, such as elopement or fall risk, and would identify needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and assistance with activities of daily living, as necessary. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate care and services rendered to the resident. Findings: A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 92 was admitted with diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (abnormally high blood sugar level) and gangrene (a serious condition where a loss of blood supply causes body tissue to die). During an interview on 7/21/23, at 2:25 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing acknowledged that there was no evidence of documentation of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and to implement the Care Plans (CP, a road map for patient care) and CP interventions for five (5) of 23sampled residents (Residents 85, 20, 35, 92, and 66) when: 1. Resident 20 did not have a care plan to address the wound on the left leg; 2. Resident 85 did not have a care plan to address the contractures to both upper extremities (arms); 3. Resident 35 did not have a care plan to address the assistance required during meals; 4. Resident 92 did not have a care plan to address the left leg gangrene (tissue death caused by an infection or lack of blood flow). 5. For Resident 66, the staff did not implement the Care Plan intervention to notify the Physician and the Registered Dietitian (RD) of the significant weight loss of 8-9 % in two weeks, on 4/23. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents health and well-being at risk of harm. Findings: 1. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 39 was admitted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident's Care Plan was updated /revised for one of three (3) sampled residents (Resident 66) when, the CP Interventions to address weight loss did not include the recommendations made by the Registered Dietitian (RD). Failure to revise/update the CP had the potential to delay the care and services, cause miscommunication among caregivers, and cause further decline in the resident's health and well-being which could further compromise her medical condition. Findings: Review of the admission Record, dated 7/20/23 indicated, Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission History and Physical, dated 3/24/23 indicated, the diagnoses that included left femoral hip fracture (break in the thighbone [femur] of the hip joint), end stage renal disease (kidneys no longer function well enough to meet the body's needs of daily life) on Hemodialysis (HD, treatment to filter wastes and water from the blood), and anemia (too…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and assistance during meals for one of three sampled residents (Resident 35) when staff did not provide supervision and assistance to Resident 35 during lunch. This failure had resulted to Resident 35 had not adequately consumed her meal. Findings: A review of the face sheet indicated, Resident 35 was admitted with diagnoses including dementia (decline in memory and/or decision-making ability). Review of Resident 35's MDS dated [DATE], BIMS score of 3 indicated severe cognitive impairment. Functional status indicated Resident 35 required one-person physical assist with eating (how resident eats and drinks). During observation on 7/17/23, at 12:31 PM, CNA 1 placed the lunch tray on the overbed table and removed the lid off the plate and handed a fork to the resident. Resident 35 used the fork and reached for her plate twice. At 12:37 PM, Resident 35 stopped eating, put down the fork and closed her eyes. Resident 80…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services for one of three residents reviewed, to address the contractures of both upper extremities (BUE, both arms) for Resident 85. This failure had the potential to result to reduced functional range of motion for activities of daily living. Findings: A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 85 was admitted with diagnoses included anoxic (lack of oxygen) brain damage and epilepsy. Review of Resident 85's MDS dated [DATE] BIMS score indicated severe cognitive impairment. Functional status indicated resident required two persons physical assist with bed mobility, dressing and toilet use. During observation and interview on 7/17/23, at 10:10 AM, Resident 85 was in bed, lying on her back, and had her eyes closed. She has no responses when talked to. Nurse Assistant (CNA, care giver) 1 stated, my both arms are contracted. She is on hospice. A review of the physician (Medical Doctor), MD) order for month of 7/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was evident that the facility failed to secure the services of a licensed pharmacist who could provide comprehensive consultation on all aspects of pharmacy services. This lapse was demonstrated by the fact that the monthly medication passes consistently returned medication error rates exceeding 5%, and there was no noticeable improvement over time. Findings: During a medication pass observation conducted on 7/18/23 between the times of 7:00 AM to 9:00 AM three medication errors were observed out of twenty-five opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 12%. The three errors occurred between 3 out of 4 nurses administering medications (see F759). A review on 7/18/23 of the Pharmacy Services Agreement, which is a contract between the nursing home and the pharmacy, indicated that under Exhibit 'B', the pharmacy would provide a monthly review and observation of medication pass from the facility to a resident. A review on 7/18/23 of the Summary of Nursing Consultant Service which indicated medication pass observation for February, March, April,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and a review of records, it was found that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%. During the medication pass, three medication errors were observed out of twenty-five opportunities, resulting in an error rate of 12%. Findings: 1. The manufacturer of Flonase, GlaxoSmithKline, provides the following instructions for administering the drug: *Gently blow your nose to clear your nostrils. *Place the tip of the nozzle in one nostril and close the other nostril with your finger. *Aim slightly away from the center of your nose, press the white nozzle and sniff the mist in gently. Be careful not to spray into your eyes! *Exhale through your mouth. *Repeat if your dosage calls for two sprays. *Repeat the entire process in the other nostril. *Wipe the nozzle clean with a tissue and replace the green cap. A review on 7/18/23 of Resident 44's physician's orders indicated Flonase nasal spray 2 sprays in both nares daily. Flonase is a nasal spray that contains fluticasone propionate, which is a corticosteroid that prevents the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on food production observations, dietary staff interview and departmental document review the facility failed to ensure 2 staff members (Dietary Staffs [DS] 2 and 3) were competent in position associated functions when 1) DS 2 failed to follow the standard of practice for the preparation of pureed food items. Failure to ensure proper food preparation, utilizing standardized recipes may result in compromising the nutritional status of resident; and 2) DS 3 did not take food temperatures in accordance with food safety standards. Failure to fully follow food safety standards may result in providing residents with food that is not properly cooked and/or held and may result in foodborne illness and poor meal quality. Findings: 1. During general food production observations, in the contract kitchen, and concurrent interview on 07/17/23 10:30 AM, Dietary Staff (DS) 2 was preparing pureed sugar cookies for the evening dessert. DS 2 placed multiple handfuls of 2-1/2-to-3-inch cookies in the blender. The surveyor estimated the cookie count as 20-25. DS 2 then proceeded to add…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on meal plating observations, dietary management staff interview the facility failed to ensure meals were plated in accordance with physician ordered therapeutic diets. Failure to comprehensively follow physician ordered diets may result in further compromising patient medical status. Findings: During meal plating observation on 7/17/23 beginning at 11:45 a.m., Dietary Staff (DS) 4 was designated as the starter. DS 4 was observed preparing the meal tray by placing cutlery and napkins on the tray. Additionally, the responsibility of the starter position was to verbally communicate the physician ordered diet to the cook as well as any food dislikes/preferences for the entrée plate. It was noted DS 5 did not accurately communicate the diet order. Resident 11's physician ordered diet was listed as pureed diet, double protein portion. DS 4 did not call all the full diet, eliminating the double protein portion, therefore Resident 11 received a regular pureed diet. It was also noted DS 3 was at the end of the trayline double checking meal trays, however, did not identify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on meal distribution observations the facility failed to maintain food sanitation when staff returned soiled meal trays to the patient tray cart while unpassed meal trays remained in the cart. Findings: During dining observation, in the 100-109 hallway, on 7/17/23 beginning at 12:35 PM it was noted a nursing staff member placed two soiled patient meal tray in the same area as unpassed resident meal trays. It was noted Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) guided staff to place the tray in the narrow right sight of the patient meal cart. In a concurrent interview LN 2 stated his function was to check meal trays for proper texture and fluid thickness in accordance with physician's diet order. In a follow up meal distribution observation on 7/18/23 at 12:35 PM the patient meal cart was delivered to the 210 hallway. In a concurrent interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2 stated there was only one meal cart for clean and soiled trays and nursing staff should be holding onto soiled trays until all resident meals were passed and the cart was empty. In a phone conversation with the Administrator on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-24 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and records review, the facility failed to monitor the hospice services provided by the hospice agency for one of three residents reviewed, Resident 58, when the hospice agency did not comply with their consented number of weekly visits to Resident 58. This failure resulted in the resident looking unkempt, dry, ashy, dishelved and angry. Findings: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated that resident was admitted in the facility on 6/18/23 with diagnosis which includes encounter for palliative care (an interdisciplinary medical caregiving approach aimed at optimizing quality of life and mitigating suffering among people with serious complex, and often terminal illnesses), complete intestinal obstruction (significant mechanical impairment or complete arrest of the passage of contents through the intestine due to pathology that causes blockage of the bowel), chronic kidney disease stage 4 (that the kidneys are moderately or severely damaged and are not working as well as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement its policy and procedure on infection control and standards of practice, titled fraser health, for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 39 and 90) when: 1. For Resident 39, 1a. The wound vac connecting tubing was in plain sight uncovered, lying on the floor. 1b. The used, dirty pair of scissors was used to cut the clean foam wound dressing. 1c. The overbed table was not cleaned and disinfected. 2. For Resident 90, the yankauer suction (an oral suction device) and its connecting tubing was undated, unlabeled and not changed (every week) as per Standard of Practice. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at risk of exposure to healthcare acquired infections (HCAI, infections acquired while residents are receiving health care in a facility for another condition) and cross contamination (transfer of bacteria or other microorganisms from one substance or surface to another). Findings: 1a. A review of the face sheet indicated Resident 39 was admitted with diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespread
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs (is generally a drug or chemical whose manufacture, possession, or use is regulated by a government) in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. This deficient practice had the potential for diversion of controlled medications. Findings: During an observation of medication room and concurrent interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 11/22/19, at 8:37 AM, DON stated that licensed nurses gave the discontinued controlled medications to her upon resident's discharge or death. DON stated she kept the controlled medications in a locked cabinet in the medication room. DON opened the locked cabinet and found 5 discontinued controlled medications. The two medications belonged to Resident 34, were as follows: - morphine 20 mg/ml (milligrams/milliliters) solution bottle - lorazepam 0.5 mg (milligrams) tablet blister pack Review of Resident 34's clinical record, titled, ANTIBIOTIC OR CONTROLLED DRUG RECORD FOR LIQUIDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions when one kitchen staff member (KS) did not perform hand washing after picking up a pot that had fallen on the floor and before handling clean cookware used during food preparation. This failure had the potential to contaminate food served to the residents placing them at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings: During an observation in the kitchen with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) on 11/20/19 at 9:28 AM, during pureed food preparation, the KS, with gloved hands, placed a tray of cooked meat loaf patties on the kitchen countertop. On the same countertop, there were also a blender and a pot. After placing the tray of meat loaf on the countertop, the KS reached for the pot. While reaching for the pot, the pot fell on the floor. The KS picked up the pot from the floor and placed it on a rack. Without performing hand washing and changing gloves, the KS took a clean pot from another rack and placed it on the countertop with the tray of cooked meat loaf patties. The KS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2019-11-22 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store garbage properly when the compost dumpster was not covered. This failure had the potential for rodents and insects to access the garbage which could potentially expose the residents to serious health risks. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS) on 11/20/19 at 9:51 AM, the facility compost dumpster was located outside the kitchen. The compost dumpster was unattended and had one of its two lids opened and flipped upwards. The DSS acknowledged the observation and stated that the compost dumpster should be fully closed for infection control. Review of the undated facility policy titled, Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal, indicated, . Policy statement . Food-related garbage and rubbish shall be disposed of in accordance with current state laws regulating such matters . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. All garbage and rubbish containers shall be provided and must be kept covered when stored or not in continuous use . 7. Outside…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for four of 19 residents when: 1. Resident 55 did not have a care plan for infection 2. Resident 72 did not have a care plan for infection 3. Resident 334 did not have a care plan for methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA infection - bacterial infection that is difficult to treat because of resistance to some antibiotics). 4. Resident 64 did not have a care plan for Divalproex (a medication used to treat manic behaviors) This deficient practice increased the risk of infection for Resident 55, Resident 72, and Resident 334. For Resident 64, this deficient practice raised the likelihood of the resident experiencing adverse effects from Divalproex. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 55 (via translator), Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, and Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, on 11/18/19, at 10:28 AM, in the bedroom of Resident 55, Resident 55 sat in bed next to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. For four of five residents (Resident 38, 26, 64 and 41) observed during medication passes, there were 9 errors in 29 opportunities which resulted in a medication error rate of 31.03%. 1. For Resident 38, (a.) folic acid and vitamin B 12 were not given according to physician's order and (b.) dorzolamide and brimonidine eye drops were not given according to professional standards of practice. 2. For Resident 26, the atenolol was not given according to physician's orders. 3. For Resident 64 , fluphenazine and fluticasone nasal spray were not given according to physician's orders. 4. For Resident 41, metoprolol and senna were not given according to professional standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential for the medications to be ineffective and cause untoward effects on the residents. Findings: 1.a. Resident 38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included vitamin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident 26 and 38) were free from any significant medication error when medications were not given according to physician's order. This deficient practice had the potential to cause Resident 26 and 38 discomfort and jeopardize their health and safety. Findings: 1. Resident 26 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that included diabetes (high blood sugar), cerebral infarction (or stroke, is a brain lesion in which a cluster of brain cells die when they don't get enough blood), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rate that can increase the risk of strokes, heart failure and other heart-related complications), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident 26's clinical record titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool), dated 8/27/19, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a brief assessment to help detect cognitive impairment) score of 10,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure medication storage when: 1. The facility stored medical supplies past expiration date including syringes and gloves in the medication room. 2. The facility did not ensure the medication room was accessed only by authorized staff. This deficient practice had the potential for unsafe medication administration and loss or diversion of all medication. Findings: 1. During an observation of the medication room and concurrent staff interview on [DATE] at 1:35 PM, the following expired items were found inside the medication room: - 35 pieces of 5 milliliter (ml) syringes with expiration date of 11/2018 - 22 pieces of enteral feeding flat top piston syringe with expiration date of 2/2016 - 7 pieces of latex exam gloves with expiration date of 2/2015 - 83 pieces of expired 12 powder-free nitrile exam gloves with expiration date of 10/2016 Registered Nurse (RN) 3 acknowledged the above findings. RN 3 stated that the staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-11-22 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage and consumption of food brought in by visitors when unlabeled leftover food items were found in the rooms of three of 80 residents (Resident 331, 333, and 50). This failure had the potential for the residents to consume food that was potentially expired and could cause foodborne illnesses (an infection caused by consuming food or drink contaminated with disease-causing germs). Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 331, the admission Record dated 11/21/19 indicated Resident 331 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and end stage renal disease (a condition in which the kidneys no longer function normally). During an observation on 11/18/19 at 10:16 AM, Resident 331 was in bed, asleep. A visitor was in Resident 331's room. There was a clear plastic box containing several pieces of white round food items and an item wrapped in aluminum foil found on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection prevention control and practices when: 1. The medication tray and medication cart was not disinfected properly between patient use. 2. A staff's jacket was found hanging in the medication room storage. This deficient practice had the potential for spread of infection within the facility including residents and visitors. Findings: 1. During medication pass observation on 11/20/19, at 8:42 AM, and concurrent interview, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 put the medication tray on top of Resident's 38's overbed table. After administering Resident 38's medications, LVN 2 exited the room and placed the medication tray on top of the medication cart. Then, LVN 2 grabbed a disinfecting wipe and wiped the top of the medication tray. LVN 2 did not wipe the bottom of the medication tray and the top of the medication cart. LVN 2 proceeded in preparing Resident 15's medications using the same medication tray. LVN 2 acknowledged the above findings and stated, I should also wipe the bottom of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool), for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 1), was submitted in a timely manner when the MDS dated [DATE] for Resident 1 was not submitted until [DATE]. This deficient practice had the potential to misrepresent the current condition of Resident 1. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with MDS Coordinator and MDS Consultant, on [DATE], at 11 AM, MDS Coordinator and MDS Consultant reviewed the medical record for Resident 1 and stated Resident 1 expired in the facility, on [DATE]; however, MDS Coordinator and MDS Consultant, could not find any records of an MDS for Resident 1 in the resident's medical record. MDS Coordinator stated the MDS records for the resident would be in the previous computer software. MDS Consultant added Resident 1 resided in the facility before the facility transitioned its current electronic system in August, 2019; therefore, their MDS record was in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool) for one of 19 residents (Resident 82) when the MDS for Resident 82, dated 9/21/19, indicated Resident 82 was discharged to the hospital instead of the community. This deficient practice had the potential to misrepresent the discharge location of Resident 82. Findings: A review of the medical record for Resident 82 indicated the resident received care in the facility between 9/9/19 and 9/21/19; Resident 82 was discharged to the community with home health, on 9/21/19. A review of the discharge MDS for Resident 82, dated 9/21/19, indicated the resident was discharged to the hospital. During a concurrent record review and interview with the MDS Coordinator, on 11/21/19, at 11:35 AM, MDS Coordinator reviewed the medical record of Resident 82 and stated the resident was discharged home. MDS Coordinator then reviewed the MDS of Resident 82, dated 9/21/19, and stated The discharge MDS says [Resident 82 was] discharged to hospital, but this is not the case…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the services provided by the facility met professional standards of quality when Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2 did not administer eye drops to Resident 38 according to professional standards. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the effectiveness of the medication which could result in Resident 38 not receiving the full benefits of the medication. Findings: Resident 38 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (group of symptoms associated with a decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities) and glaucoma (a condition that damages the eye's optic nerve and cause vision loss). During a medication pass observation on 11/20/19 at 9:07 AM, LVN 2 administered one drop of dorzolamide ophthalmic solution to both eyes of Resident 38, then, at 9:09 AM, LVN 2 administered one drop of brimonidine ophthalmic solution to both eyes of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of 19 sampled resident (Resident 73), there was no documentation the pharmacy consultant identified significant drug-drug interactions for Resident 73's medications. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 73 to receive unnecessary drugs which could lead to untoward effects affecting Resident 73's mental, physical, functional, and psychosocial status. Definitions: Adverse consequence is a broad term referring to unwanted, uncomfortable, or dangerous effects that a drug may have, such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status. It may include various types of adverse drug reactions and interactions (e.g., medication-medication, medication-food, and medication-disease. Medication Interaction is the impact of another substance (such as another medication, herbal product, food or substances used in diagnostic studies) upon a medication. The interactions may alter absorption, distribution,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor for specific target behavior/s (actual undesirable/unwanted behaviors that occur as a result of the medical condition) for the use of Divalproex (a medication used for treatment of manic behaviors) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 64). This failure placed Resident 64 at risk of continued use of medications without adequate indication for use, adequate monitoring, or performing gradual dose reductions, which can subsequently put the resident at risk for harm related to unnecessary psychotropic medication (any drug capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) use. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 64, the admission Record dated 11/21/19, indicated Resident 64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar type schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder that is marked by a combination of schizophrenia symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.9+2.1 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.7+1.3 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 53.4+1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/08/2021
CH GOLDEN HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF25%since 04/08/2021
CW GOLDEN HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 04/08/2021
BRUCE, MARTHAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
EARL, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
YENOWITZ, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
GOLDEN SNF CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
GOLDEN SNF OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
VERITAS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
FLEMING, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
LAI, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
SPIELMAN, SHIMONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/31/2023
WC - DALY CITY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/12/2025
WITZCORP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021
KOPELOWITZ, SHAULIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 3%Other / private 27%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$487per resident / day
operating cost
$14,814per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$486per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055968. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next