Madera Care Center
1700 Howard Road, Madera, CA 93637 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 64 certified beds · (559) 673-9278 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $41,597 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-08)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.1% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.6% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.4% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 2.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.77 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 27.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.2%CMS range 38.8–61.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.6–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 27.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 24.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 87.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 84.6% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 8.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.6%CMS range 3.3–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 60.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
38 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 28 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the state agency two episodes of alleged or suspected abuse violations when;1. An unknown intruder entered the facility without staff knowledge and interacted with Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, and Resident 4. 2. One resident (Resident 6) struck another resident (Resident 5) across the face with a walker, causing a laceration (cut in the skin) on his left eyebrow. These failures resulted in delayed investigations, potential for delayed protection and continued harm for the five sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, and Resident 5). During a review of the document titled On-Line Health Facility Complaint (OLHFC), dated 3/12/26, at 10:38 a.m., from the [NAME] County Department of Social Services, the OLHFC indicated, On March 12, 2026, the [[NAME] County Department of Social Services] received a written report of suspected elder abuse from [NAME] Police Department (case # 26M-00810). It was reported that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to report an elopement (resident leaving a healthcare facility, hospital, or care setting without authorization, without being discharged , or without notifying staff.) to the State Survey Agency within the required timeframe for one of three residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was not reassessed for risk of elopement after repeatedly expressing the desire to leave the facility and return to the river. On 2/8/26, Resident 1 left the facility without staff knowledge or supervision. The State Agency was unaware of the elopement until it was reported by the Ombudsman (a neutral, independent advocate who investigates, and resolves issues between patients/residents and healthcare providers, insurers, and long term care facilities) on 2/26/26. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for harm including injury from traffic, lack of access to food or medications, and exposure to the environmental elements, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was consistently enough linen (specifically towels and washcloths) available for incontinent residents (those unable to control their bowels and/or bladders) during night shifts. This failure resulted in the facility's incontinent residents, approximately over half of the facility's census of 64, to receive incontinent care with non-linen items such as toilet paper, which has the potential to increase discomfort, decrease cleaning, and increase chance of skin issues. (Linens, such as washcloths, provide better to provide care to incontinent residents with because they can retain moisture better, are gentler on skin, reduce the risk of skin breakdown, clean better, and are more comfortable, especially when pre-moistened with warm water). Findings: During an interview on 4/11/25, at 1:50 p.m., with Laundry Worker (LW) 1, LW 1 stated she normally begins her shift at 5 a.m., and is responsible for washing, drying, folding,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of three residents (Resident 1) with dignity and respect when Resident 1 requested assistance from the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to locate the footrest (a stationary hanger and footplate for the user's feet to rest on the wheelchair) to her wheelchair and the CNA told Resident 1 to shut up on 3/31/25. This failure resulted in Resident 1 to experience mental and emotional distress (anger and frustration) on 3/31/25. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/3/25 at 9:47 a.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting in her wheelchair and Spanish speaking only. The Unit Manager (UM) interpreted. Resident 1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. Resident 1 stated on 3/31/25 at 3:30 a.m., the CNA came to assist her to get ready for dialysis (a medical treatment that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys have failed). Resident 1 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for 1 (Resident #7) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for dialysis. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, revised 08/2024, indicated, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP's) are utilized to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. The policy revealed the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation, included, 5. EBPs are indicated (when contact precautions do not otherwise apply) for resident with wounds and/or indwelling medical devise regardless of MDRO colonization. Further review revealed, b. Indwelling medical devices include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes and tracheostomies. The policy revealed, 6. EBP's remain in place for the duration of the resident's stay or until the resolution of the wound or discontinuation of the indwelling medical device that places them at risk. Per the policy, 11. Signs are posted in [sic] the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for one of three residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 required two person assist for transfer but was transferred from wheelchair to bed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 without another person to assist on [DATE]. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling out of bed and onto the floor on [DATE] and the potential for Resident 1 to be injured. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:41 a.m. with Resident 1 in Resident 1's room, Resident 1 was sitting in a wheelchair. Resident 1's left arm and left leg was contracted (a medical condition where muscles, tendons, or other tissues become permanently shortened and tight, resulting in limited range of motion and joint stiffness). Resident 1 stated he fell off the bed a few days ago. Resident 1 was unable to recall the date. Resident 1 stated one staff member was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) received supplemental oxygen (from a portable tank which delivers oxygen through a tube inserted into the nostrils), as ordered by her physician, when she left the facility to go to a medical appointment. This failure resulted in Resident 1 going approximately 7 hours without her physician-ordered supplemental oxygen, which has the potential to cause respiratory distress such as shortness of breath, elevated heart rate, anxiety, and confusion. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) dated 7/3/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia (a condition where there is too much carbon dioxide, a waste product, in the body), and Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen. During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 7/3/24, the OSR indicated Resident 1 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was admitted with a stage 3 pressure ulcer (damage to an area of the skin caused by constant pressure on the area for a long time through the skin into deeper tissue and fat but do not reach muscle, tendon, or bone) to the sacral (tailbone) region on 4/17/24 and Resident 1 ' s stage 3 pressure ulcer assessment was not documented (a process used to learn about a patient's condition) until 5/14/24. This failure was not the standard of practice according to the facility ' s policy and procedure titled, Charting and Documentation, and Prevention of Pressure Injuries. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 6/19/24, the AR indicated Resident 1 had a stage 3 pressure ulcer to the sacral region. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Admission/readmission Evaluation (ARE), dated 4/17/24, the ARE indicated, 4a. Is a skin issue present? Yes. Site: Sacrum. Description: Stage III (3) pressure ulcer.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. There was a build-up of food crumbs and debris under the dishwasher, this had the potential for microorganism growth and to attract pests. 2. The ceiling had a patch that was not smooth and easily cleanable, this had the potential for build-up of dust and microorganism growth. These failures had the potential for microorganism growth that could be inadvertently transferred to food and to attract pests in the kitchen that prepared food for 47 out of 47 medically compromised residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/13/24 at 10:47 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisory (DS) in the kitchen, a build-up of food crumbs and debris was seen under the dishwasher area. The DS stated it is hard to clean under the dishwasher area. During a phone interview on 2/15/24 at 4:01 p.m. with the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated her expectation was for staff to thoroughly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a clean, safe, and sanitary homelike environment for six of 19 sampled residents (Residents 4, 8, 10, 15, 29 and 31) when: 1. There were missing floor tile in Residents 4 and Resident 10's bathroom with darkened areas in the tile grout. 2. There was a missing baseboard from the wall behind Resident 8's bed exposing chipped paint and grime. 3. The floor tile by Resident 15's bed was broken with missing pieces of tile. 4. There were trash and dirt on the floors and dirty (blackened) floor tiles in Resident 29's room. 5. The privacy curtain in Resident 31's room was torn. These failures placed Residents 4, 8, 10, 15, 31 and 29 in an unclean, unsafe, unsanitary and a non-homelike environment which could affect residents' well-being. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/13/24 at 11:50 a.m., with Resident 10 in Resident 10's room, Resident 10 was observed sitting up in a wheelchair. Resident 10 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 28 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan (CP-the process by which healthcare professionals and patients discuss, agree, and review an action plan to achieve the goals or behavior change of most importance to the patient) to prevent falls and injuries, for four (4) of fifty-four (54) sampled residents (Resident 4, Resident 28, Resident 250, and Resident 410) when: 1. Resident 4's supervision CP during meals was not implemented. This failure put Resident 4 at an increased risk of choking and aspiration of food. 2. Resident 28's toenail clipping and/or podiatry care was not done and there was no CP to address repeated refusals to bathe or shower. This failure placed Resident 28 at risk for infection and other diabetic (high blood sugar disease) complications. 3. Resident 250 fell out of bed on 9/13/23 and the fall mat (a cushion made of high-density foam and covered with a non-slip material to minimize the risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menu was followed for the dysphagia advanced (bite-sized foods that are moist) diet for five of 47 sampled residents (Residents 17, 22, 31, 35, and 36) when Residents 17, 22, 31, 35, and 36 received puree broccoli instead of chopped broccoli for lunch. This failure had the potential to result in Residents 17, 22, 31, 35, and 36 having a decrease in satisfaction with their meal because it was not the correct texture of food as prescribed by the physician. Findings: During an observation on 2/13/24 at 11:54 a.m. in the kitchen, [NAME] 1 plated the food for residents and served Resident 36 who was on a dysphagia advanced diet pureed broccoli. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/15/24 at 10:29 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), Resident 36's lunch meal tray ticket (document which indicates food items residents received for their meal), dated 2/13/24 was reviewed. The lunch meal tray ticket indicated, Resident 36 should receive half a cup of chopped roasted brussels sprouts…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide needed care according to professional standards of practice for one of four sampled residents (Resident 59) when facility did not notify physician of Resident 59's change of condition (COC) of hyperglycemia (high blood sugar). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 59's development of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA- complication of diabetes, when the body can't make enough insulin to allow blood sugar into the cells for energy and the body breaks down fat). Findings: During a review of Resident 59's admission Record (a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), indicated Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis, . Influenza A with Pneumonia (lung inflammation caused by virus or bacteria) . Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM-long term condition in which the body…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of four sampled residents (Resident 361 and Resident 17) when 1. Resident 361's toenails were not cut or trimmed for a year and 3 months. 2. Resident 17's toenails were not cut or trimmed. These failures resulted in Resident 361's and Resident 17's toenails to become long and curled which had the potential to result in Resident 361's and Resident 17's toenails to become painful, ingrown or to break off the nail bed causing infection and limit resident's mobility during activities of daily living (ADL). Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/13/24 at 3:20 p.m. in Resident 361's room, Resident 361 was observed lying in bed with both feet exposed, observed to have long, yellow, hard thick toenails (all ten toes). During a review of Resident 361's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 361 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The AR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure drug records to account for the receipt and accurate reconciliation (comparing medication received is being delivered) for controlled medications (medications that may be abused or cause addiction) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 13) when the pharmacy manifest (form that contains information about the type and quantity of medication delivered) was not signed upon delivery of a controlled medication. This failure had the potential for drug diversion (distribution or abuse of a prescription drug or it's use for purpose) of Resident 13's controlled medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and record review on 2/14/24 at 11:24 a.m. with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1, Resident 13's medication Acetaminophen-codeine (APAP/COD) #3 (controlled medication) tablet 300-30 mg (unit of measure) was observed during Medication cart 2's review of medications. During a review of Resident 13's admission Record (a summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards when: 1. The facility's medication emergency kit (ekit) containing controlled medications (medications that may be abused or cause addiction) was observed missing a zip tie. 2. Medication for one of three sampled residents (Resident 14) was observed with expired date in Medication Cart two. These failures had the potential for medication diversion (distribution or abuse of a prescription drug or it's use for purpose) from the ekit and the potential for adverse effects (undesired harmful effect) and medication error for Resident 14 when the expired medication was left in the medication cart. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/14/24 at 10:48 a.m. with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1 in the medication room, the ekit for medications taken by mouth, was observed inside a file cabinet with one red zip tie on the right-side…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of infections when: 1. Unit Manager-Registered Nurse (UM- RN) did not perform hand hygiene during a dressing change to Resident 28; 2. Three hand sanitizer dispensers in the hallway outside resident rooms did not work; These failures placed residents at risk for cross-contamination (the process by which bacteria or other microorganisms are unintentionally transferred from one substance or object to another, with harmful effect). Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/14/24 at 3:35 p.m. in Resident 28's room, Unit Manager, RN (UM-RN) was observed performing a dressing change to Resident 28's right lower leg. UM-RN was observed removing soiled gloves after removing a soiled bandage and donning (putting on) new clean gloves without performing hand hygiene. During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR), dated 2/15/24, the AR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition when a drawer holding clean utensils used for meal service was no longer on the drawer track (the mechanisms that allow drawers to open and close smoothly) and was difficult to open and close. This failure had the potential to result in contamination of the clean utensils because the drawer could not be completely closed and potential in bodily injury to dietary staff. Findings: During an initial kitchen tour on 2/13/24 at 10:58 a.m., an observation of a drawer holding clean utensils used for meal service was found to be difficult to open and close and it was kept ajar. The drawer was not on the track on one side and it make it difficult to open and close. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/14/24 at 8:34 a.m. with the District Dietary Manager (DDM) in the kitchen, a drawer was difficult to open and close. The DDM stated, the DDM was not sure if the drawer could be fixed. During an interview on 2/15/24 at 10:41 a.m. with the Regional Maintenance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a copy of the resident's medical record for one of one resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 requested her medical records on 9/21/23. This failure was not the standard of practice according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Release of Information. Findings: During an interview on 10/6/23 at 12:23 p.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated she requested her medical records on 9/21/23 and received her requested documents on 10/2/23. During a review of Resident 1's Medical Record Request form (MRR), dated 9/21/23, the MRR from indicated, Resident 1 and the Medical Records Director signed the MRR on 9/21/23. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/6/23 at 11:55 a.m., with Medical Records Director (MRD), Resident 1's MMR and the facility's P&P titled, Release of Information, were reviewed. The MMR indicated Resident 1 requested the release of her medical records on 9/21/23. MRD stated Resident 1's medical records were delivered to Resident 1 a week later after the request. MRD stated he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0801 — widespreadEmploy sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietetic services observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian conducted effective oversight of the food and nutrition department in accordance with the facility's executed contract and professional standards of practice. These failures had the potential to result in ineffective and inadequate directing of the day-to-day Food and Nutrition operations to ensure the nutritional needs for 46 of 48 sampled residents were met in a safe and sanitary manner. (Cross reference: F692, F802, F803, F804, F805, F806 and F812) Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 4/10/23, beginning at 9:32 AM, observations and concurrent interviews were conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) regarding overall kitchen sanitation and cleanliness. There were multiple areas and equipment in the kitchen that were not clean including but not limited to: a. The prep sink (sink used to preparation of foods) did not have an air gap (a fixture that provides back-flow prevention). b. Several places in the kitchen covered with brown, grey and black…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff safely and effectively carried out the functions of food and nutrition services when: 1. One of the dietary staff and the Dietary Manager did not know the right location to check dish machine sanitizer. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 46 out of 48 sampled residents who received food from the kitchen. 2. One of the dietary staff and the Dietary Manager did not know the proper steps for washing dishes in two-compartment sinks. This failure had the potential to cause foodborne illness for 48 out of 50 sampled residents who received food from the kitchen. 3. The AM [NAME] did not follow pureed bread recipe for preparing pureed bread during lunch on 4/11/23. This failure result in 12 out of 12 sampled residents who were on pureed bread received less nutritive value and unappetizing pureed bread. (Cross referred 803) 4. Dietary staff served 3-inch-long green bean salad for Residents on Dysphagia Mechanically Altered diet (a diet with food texture need to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices in the kitchen when: 1. There was no air gap (a fixture that provides back-flow prevention. When installed and maintained properly, the air gap works to prevents drain water from backing up into the sink and possibly contaminating the area used for washing food) under the prep sink (sink used to preparation of foods). 2. There was brown, grey and black debris observed several places in the kitchen: exit door to hallway, on the insect lamp, two ventilator's fans inside milk refrigerator, the exit door to the dining hall, in the dry storage room's storage shelves and door, the air conditioning and heating unit next to hand washing sink, the window, fans, ventilator in dishwashing area 3. There was calcium buildup on the dishwasher and ice machine's curtain. 4. There can opener and can opened based was unsanitary. 5. There was a red bucket filled with cleaning solution stored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for the residents in rooms 17, 3,10, and 26, and those using the dining room when: 1. Resident rooms 17, 3, 10, and 26 were in disrepair. 2. The noise level in the dining room was too loud. These failures resulted in an unhomelike atmosphere. FINDINGS: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/11/23, at 9:51 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] with Resident 48, Resident 48 stated, she had been in the facility almost 7 months. Resident stated the entire building needed repair. Resident stated, there was tile coming up, sheet rock exposed, paint in bad condition over the entire building, and the dining room needed to be redone. During an observation on 4/10/23, at 10 a.m. in room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom was missing the paper towel dispenser from the wall and the wall had been damaged from where the paper towel dispenser had previously been. During a resident council meeting, on 4/11/23, at 3:28 p.m., the residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective interventions to meet the needs of residents and in accordance with standards of practice for one of five sampled residents, Resident 41, when Resident was diagnosed with leg varicose veins and nursing staff did not implement every two hour repositioning and range of motion. This failure resulted in Resident 41 acquiring new venous ulcers, delay in wound healing, pain, suffering, and decreased mobility. This failure also had the potential to result in infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 41's admission Face Sheet (AFS-document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 4/13/23, the AFS indicated, Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 41's diagnoses included .Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar) .Muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength) .Chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate) .Non-pressure chronic ulcer (wound due to lack…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systemic approach, to ensure effective monitoring systems to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 41). The facility failed to ensure a Registered Dietitian (RD) provided nutritional interventions despite documented meetings acknowledging weight loss. The facility failed to ensure RD effectively monitored nutrition interventions, after an unplanned severe and continuous weight loss of 13.6-pound (lbs.) 8 percent weight loss in five months from 12/6/22-4/2/23. There was no plan of care to address the weight loss and prevent further weight loss. Findings: 1. During a review of resident 41's medical record, titled, admission Face Sheet (AFS-document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 4/13/23, the AFS indicated Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The AFS indicated Resident 41's diagnoses included .Type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the total number of licensed and unlicensed staff and actual hours worked per shift within two hours of the start of each shift in accordance with the facility policy and procedure when the posting did not represent actual hours worked but projected hours. This failure resulted in residents and visitors not having the benefit of viewing the actual hours and total number of staff providing care per shift and possibly not meeting the needs of the residents FINDINGS: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 4/12/23, at 12:07 p.m., the bulletin board on C hall was observed with the Administrator (ADM) and Director of Staff Development (DSD). The ADM indicated, the projected hours of licensed and unlicensed personnel was posted instead of actual hours. The DSD stated she had been posting the projected hours and was unaware she was supposed to port the actual hours. ADM stated, per policy, they were supposed to post the actual hours within 2 hours of the shift starting. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on dietary production observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the pureed bread recipe was followed by an A.M. [NAME] for lunch on 4/11/23. This failure result in twelve out of twelve sampled residents (Residents' 3, 4, 18, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 34, 152, 155, 352) who on pureed bread received less nutritive value and unappetizing pureed bread. This failure had potential result in negatively impact the residents' nutritional status and further compromising residents' medical status. Finding: ( Cross reference 801, 802) During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/11/23, at 11:51 a.m., with an AM [NAME] (CK), in the kitchen, CK was observed pouring unmeasured hot water while preparing pureed bread. CK confirmed she was adding unmeasured hot water while preparing pureed bread. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/11/23, at 1:04 p.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM) and District Dietary Manager (DDM), at dining room, a test meal was performed for food temperature and palatability (taste and/or flavor) of the regular and puree diet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its policy on Food: Quality and Palatability to provide appetizing food at appropriate temperatures according to residents' preferences for ten of 46 sampled residents (Residents' 6, 20, 23, 33, 39, 45, 48, 49,155, 353). This failure had the potential risk to decrease nutritional intake and affect the residents' nutritional status and further compromising residents' medical status. Finding: During an interview on 4/10/23, at 9:56 a.m., with Resident 48, Resident 48 stated, Food is not appealing, no taste, no options, no presentation, it is not good. That is my main concern. During an interview on 4/10/23, at 10:27 a.m., with Resident 39, Resident 39 stated, Food does not taste good. During an interview on 4/10/23, at 12:55 p.m., with Resident 49, Resident 49 stated, There is no taste of provided foods and soup is always cold. During an interview on 4/10/23, at 3:05 p.m., with Resident 155, Resident 155 stated, provided foods tasted horrible. During an interview on 4/10/23, at 3:30 p.m., with Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate food and beverage textures were provided as evidence by: 1. Three of six sampled residents (Residents'11, 30, 42 ) received Dysphagia Mechanically Altered diet (a diet with food texture need to chop up or ground into small piece for residents who have limited chewing and swallowing ability) received 3-inch-long green bean salad for lunch on 4/10/23. 2. Resident 25 was ordered with honey thick consistency, was served unmixed regular consistency coffee with lumpy thickeners during lunch on 4/10/23. 3. Twelve of twelve sampled residents (Residents' 3, 4, 18, 21, 22, 24, 25, 28, 34, 152, 155, 352) ordered Dysphagia Puree diet (a diet with food texture need to blend until smooth into mashed potatoes consistency for residents who have severe chewing and/or swallowing ability) received chunks meatball during lunch on 4/11/23. 4. Seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents' 3, 22, 24, 25, 34, 155, 352) ordered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete, accurately documented and readily accessible for three of six sampled residents (Residents' 22, 32 and 103) when: 1. Resident 22's copy of Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form (a legal document that specifies the type of care a resident's treatment and services would like in an emergency life threatening medical situation) was signed and dated thirteen months by the Medical Doctor (MD) after it was prepared and readily available as part of Resident 22's current medical records. 2. Resident 32's copy of POLST was incomplete and readily available as part of Resident 32's current medical record. 3. Resident 103's copy of POLST was inaccurate and readily available as part of Resident 103's current medical record. These failures had the potential risk for Residents' 22, 32 and 103's decisions regarding their healthcare and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and maintain an effective infection control and prevention program to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent infections for seven of 50 sampled residents (Residents 6, 22, 41, 31, 33, 49, 353, ) when: 1.Bedpans were observed placed on the top of the two toilets (that are shared with three other residents). One bedpan was observed in Resident 31 restroom, and one bedpan was observed in Resident 33's restrooms. Resident 31's toilet seat contained a brown substance. 2. Resident 49 had concerns of smell and cleanliness of her restroom. 3. Facility did not follow policy to replace trash receptacle liners, when trash receptacle liners (used to keep the inside of trash receptacle clean and to easily contain and transport trash from trash receptacles) were missing from Resident 353, Resident 6 and Resident 22's room and Resident 41 restroom. These failures had the potential to result in cross contamination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity and in an environment that promotes and enhances quality of life for three out of 11 sampled residents (Residents' 25, 28 and 156) when: 1. Residents' 25 and 28 were not given coffee as requested and watched other residents in the dining room drink coffee. 2. Resident 156 waited for her lunch tray while watching other residents on the same table ate. These failures violated Residents' 25, 28 and 156 the right to be offered a dignified dining experience. Findings: 1. During an observation on 4/10/23, at 11:40 a.m., in the dining room, Resident 28 was observed sitting across the table from another resident. Resident 28 observed requesting coffee from Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 7, and Resident sitting across Resident 28 was heard requesting coffee for Resident 28. Resident 28 was not served coffee and watched other residents in the dining room drink coffee. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician Informed Consent (a process in which residents are given important information of the possible risk and benefits of the use of psychoactive medications) for the use of psychotropic medications (medication capable of affecting mind, emotions, and behavior) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20) was obtained when Resident 20 was administered three psychotropic medications without an informed consent. These failures resulted for Resident 20 to be administered with psychotropic medications and not fully informed of the risk and benefits and did not have the knowledge to make an informed decision which could place Resident 20 at risk for negative side effects as he was not informed of the side effects. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/10/23, at 4:10 p.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 20 was lying in bed watching TV. Resident 20 stated he had been in the facility for three weeks for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 13) had their adaptive equipment when Resident 13 was put in the wrong wheelchair. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 13 experiencing an avoidable accident and injury. FINDINGS: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/12/23, at 4:30 pm, Resident 13 was in the hallway, in a wheelchair, holding a plastic urinal, and calling for help. Resident 31 put his call light on for Resident 13 and started yelling Help!. Business Office Manager (BOM) answered the calls for help. Resident 13 stated he needed help getting up in his chair and was afraid to fall since he's fallen before out of his chair. BOM retrieved a nursing assistant to help. During a record review of Resident 13's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS)(used to screen and identify the ability to think and remember), dated 2/24/23, the BIMS indicated Resident 13 had a score of 11 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. During a concurrent interview and record review on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS-assessment of physical and psychological functions and needs) accurately reflected resident's health and functional status for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20) when Resident 20's smoking habits was inaccurately coded on the MDS assessment. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 20's care needs not met. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/10/23, at 4:10 p.m., with Resident 20 in his room, Resident 20 was observed laying in bed watching TV. Resident 20 stated he had been in the facility for three weeks to work with therapy. Resident stated he is a smoker and never stopped smoking since 1991, goes outside to smoke everyday. Resident 20 stated they have a schedule to go outside to smoke and he goes outside to smoke everyday. Resident 20 stated when he was admitted in the facility the nursing staff did not asked him if he smoked because the staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who are receiving dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the body when the kidneys are not able to adequately filter the blood) treatment received services consistent with professional standards of practice for Resident 42 when Resident 42 had a water pitcher on the bedside table within Resident 42's reach for three consecutive days and in charge nurse did not monitor and record daily fluid intake. This failure placed Resident 42's care needs to go unmet and had the potential to result in fluid overload. Findings: During a review of Resident 42 's Face Sheet (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the face sheet indicated Resident 42 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis which included End Stage Renal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preference were honored for one of 50 sampled residents (Resident 49) when Resident 49 and her family told staff that Resident 49 disliked chopped foods. No food upgrade options were provided for Resident 49, despite informing the staff that she did not want tomatoes soup, yet she still received it on 4/12/23 during dinner. This failure resulted in Resident 49 decreased food intake with an unplanned 1.6-pound weight loss from 1/31/23 until 4/9/23 which further compromised Resident 49's nutritional and medical status. Findings: During a concurrent interview and meal tray ticket reviewed on 4/10/23, at 11:34 a.m., with Resident 49, Resident 49 stated, I told staff a lot of times, I do not like chopped foods, but they still give me chopped foods. Resident 49 stated, I do not know what kind of diet I am on. I got teeth, I can chew. Resident 49 stated, My son has told staff that I do not like chopped foods and requested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-13 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolatedDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly when trash was found outside on the floor surrounding the dumpster. And the lid of the dumpster was not close properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests and rodents. Findings: During an observation on 4/10/23, at 9:03 a.m., one of three dumpsters which was brown color, had trash, clear gloves and a glass bottle on the ground around the brown dumpster. During an observation on 4/11/23, at 8:10 a.m., observed one of the brown dumpster lids was not close and there was trash, blue and clear used glove on the ground around the brown dumpster. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/11/23, at 8:26 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM), in front of the dumpster, the DM confirmed one of the brown dumpster lids was not close and there was trash, blue and clear used glove on the ground around the brown dumpster. The DM stated, the brown dumpster's lid should be close and there was supposed no trash around the brown dumpster. During an interview on 4/11/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$41,597 in federal fines across 8 penalties.
- $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
- $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
- $12,703 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
- $9,527 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
- $2,787 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
- $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
- $1,764 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
- $3,174 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.7 | +1.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MADERA POST ACUTE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 11/04/2025 |
| SUN MERIDIAN HEALTH HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/04/2025 |
| MADERA SNF PROPCO LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| JOHNSON, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| BHINDER, SUMANDEEP | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| DEHGHANMANESH, ADRIAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| JOHNSON, FRANK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| KOCHEK, JOSHUA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| OXFORD, MICHEAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| PANNU, AMRITPAL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| SUN MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| FARRALES, MARY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
| MONTEZ, AUDRIANNA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $259K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055191. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.