Golden Pavilion Healthcare
99 Escuela Drive, Daly City, CA 94015 · For profit - Corporation · 239 certified beds · (650) 994-3200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (65) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $41,426 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-09)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.4% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.1% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.4% | 1.6% | 3.3% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 13.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.8% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.2% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 66.7% | 93.2% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.6% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.0% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.94 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.68 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
41.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 142 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 41.3%CMS range 33.5–50.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.0%CMS range 11.5–17.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 54.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 77.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 87.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 82.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 5.0–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 239 beds and averages 223.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.454 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.97 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
65 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-12-04 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) received tube feeding (a method of delivering liquid nutrition, fluids, and medication directly into the digestive system through a feeding tube when a person cannot eat or drink enough by mouth) in accordance with physician order, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals when Resident 1's tube feeding rate was increased from 60 to 200 mL/hr (milliliters per hour, which is a unit of measurement for a flow or infusion rate). This failure resulted in Resident 1 transferring to a local acute care hospital and eventually passing away due to aspiration pneumonia (a lung infection. It happens when food, liquid, or vomit is breathed into the airways or lungs instead of being swallowed, leading to inflammation and a potential bacterial infection. Symptoms include cough, fever, shortness of breath, and chest pain).Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2021-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure injury for Resident 277, one of three sampled residents with pressure injuries. The facility assessed Resident 277 as high risk for developing pressure injuries (localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence. A pressure injury may present as intact skin and may be painful). However, the facility failed to implement interventions to off load pressure to Resident 277's heels. As a result of this failure, Resident 277 developed a pressure injury to her left heel on 6/24/21. Findings: A review of Resident 277's admission record dated 6/17/21 indicated, she had end stage renal disease (ESRD, when the kidney failed to function normally), dementia (decline in memory or cognition), and diabetes (abnormally high sugar level in the blood). During initial tour and concurrent interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 3, on 6/22/21, at 10:15 AM, Resident 277 was lying on her back, head of bed elevated, and both her heels were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment free from potentially serious accident hazards for all residents when its policies and procedures were not implemented for the following practices: 1. The facility failed to implement their smoking policy and procedures (P&P) when it allowed one (1) of 11 residents (Resident 88) who smoked in the facility to keep in possession of their own lighters and cigarettes inside the resident care area. 2a. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents when Resident 225 was left unsupervised while smoking, and was later found at a nearby facility. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for injury and unsafe wandering/elopement.2b. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident 225 when he eloped from the facility and was not located for 19 hours. These failures had potential for Residents 88 and 225 to experience significant harm and/or death. 1. During a review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accident hazards for Resident 1, one of three sampled residents, when Resident 1 eloped from facility, twice, in the middle of the night, in her nightgown, exposing resident to risk of accidents, injury, or harm. The facility failed to supervise, protect, and monitor residents in their care. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to facility on 3/31/2025 following hospitalization for Traumatic Brain Injury after assault. Resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool, indicated resident did not speak or understand English, had unclear speech, was confused, had memory problems, and impaired cognition (thinking ability). Resident had lower leg impairment. During an interview on 5/5/2025 at 1:15 PM, LVN 1 (Licensed Vocational Nurse) stated when asked about checking functionality (working order) of Wanderguard alarm, I've never done that before. No body has shown me. I wasn't oriented. That night was the first time I took care of (resident) . Review of Inservice Compliance Training Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when a scheduled fentanyl patch (a medicated adhesive patch that delivers fentanyl, a strong opioid painkiller, through the skin) was not applied to Resident 1 on 5/30/25 at 9 AM on time. This failure was likely to result in putting Resident 1 at risk for not meeting her pain control need. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS, a chronic pain condition that causes intense pain, usually in the limbs, often following an injury, surgery, or stroke), functional quadriplegia (a state of complete immobility due to severe physical disability or frailty, without any underlying injury or damage to the brain or spinal cord), and generalized muscle weakness. Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary condition was met for food storage in the kitchen when there were expired strawberry topping and sliced turkey in the refrigerator. These failures had the potential to result in putting residents at risk for foodborne illness (a disease caused by consuming contaminated food or drink). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/19/25 at 2:54 PM with Dietary Supervisor (DS) 1 and Dietary Manager (DM) in the kitchen, there was one container of strawberry topping in the refrigerator with the date 6/15/23 labeled on the lid. DS 1 removed the label with the date on it, then re-attached it when asked. A picture of the container of expired strawberry topping was taken. DM acknowledged, the labeled date meant use by date when asked. DM stated, It has to be expired, when asked if the strawberry topping was expired. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/19/25 at 3:04 PM with DM in the kitchen, there was expired sliced turkey in a plastic bag in the refrigerator.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed review and revise the care plan to include pain management for Resident 525. This failure resulted in Resident 525 experiencing pain leading to discomfort. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 05/20/25 at 1:27 PM with Resident 525 in Resident 525's room, Resident 525 reported pain of 9 out of 10 (based on the pain scale ranging from 0 to 10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being the highest level of pain) and noted that the last pain medication dose with Tylenol (pain medication also known as acetaminophen) was at 12:00 PM on 05/20/25 and it had been ineffective. During an observation on 05/22/25 at 8:58 AM in Resident 525's room, Resident 525 was observed awake, moving from lying flat on the back to using right hand and arm to pull self to lying on the left side (a position in which the left shoulder and left hip are touching the bed and the right side is facing up toward the ceiling). During a review of Resident 525's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-27 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 30) received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well- being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. This failure resulted in Resident 30 having loud verbal outbursts, using foul language, inappropriate hand gestures when interacting with staff and other residents, including Resident 30 throwing urine at his roommate. Findings: A review of a Resident 30's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool). Dated 4/24/2025, indicated that Resident 30 has multiple diagnosis including Bipolar Disorder (a mental health condition characterized by intense mood swings), unspecified. During a concurrent interview and observation on 5/20/25 at 1:26 PM, Resident 30 was observed lying in bed with urinal, appearing to be a quarter filled, hanging on the left raised quarter siderail. Resident 30 reported he wants to go home. When asked about potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control program and practices designed to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infections when the PICC (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter: a long, thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein, usually in the arm, and advanced to a larger vein near the heart. It provides access to the bloodstream for delivering medications, fluids, and blood draws for a prolonged period, reducing the need for frequent needle insertions.) line dressing was overdue to change for one of 2 sampled residents (Resident 380). This failure had the potential to develop infection in Resident 380. Findings: Review of Resident 380's clinical record indicated, Resident 380 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), malnutrition (an imbalance between the nutrients your body needs to function and the nutrients it gets), and chronic kidney disease (a progressive condition where the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility: 1. Did not ensure prescribed medication for Resident 1 was available on the scheduled administration time on 3/18/25 at 4:00 PM, and 3/19/25 at 12:00 AM and 8:00AM. 2. Did not properly account for the receipt of the controlled medication (drugs or substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and addiction) (diazepam- a controlled substance to treat anxiety, muscle spasms, and seizures) for Resident 1. These failures resulted in the potential for reduced effectiveness to prevent a worsening of symptoms or flare-ups of muscle spasms or increased physical discomfort related to complex regional pain syndrome or potentially leading to anxiety or mood swings. Improper accounting practices during the receipt of this controlled medication compromises the facility's ability to maintain adequate medication availability and meet the resident's needs. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/19/25 at 1:35 PM with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Licensed Vocational Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessment of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the MDS did not document dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills), fracture (broken bone) and osteopenia (bone density loss, weak bones) as active diagnoses. The facility failure resulted to inaccurate MDS to reflect Resident 1's current health status. Findings: During an observation on 1/105:02 PM, Resident 1 was awake, verbally responsive, sitting up in bed, with bandage to left forearm. Resident 1 was not able to relate how she sustained the fracture to the left forearm. During an interview on 1/3/25 @1:06 PM, MDS Nurse 1 reviewed the MDS dated [DATE], for Resident 1, acknowledged that dementia, osteopenia, and fracture was not entered in the MDS and stated that when completing the MDS, the residents clinical record is reviewed. MDS Nurse 1 also stated the physician order is not a source of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician (Medical Doctor, MD) order for one of three sampled resident (Resident 1) when the splint (a supportive device to immobilize [to stop or reduce movement] and protect a broken bone) was not applied to the fractured left forearm. The facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to develop complication and further resident harm. Findings: A review of the admission records indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) failure (when the kidneys stopped working) and dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills) and history of fracture (broken bones). During an observation on 1/13/25, at 10 AM, Resident 1 was awake, verbally responsive, sitting up in bed. Resident 1 was not able to relate how she sustained the fracture to the left forearm. A review of Orthopedic note dated 9/17/24, indicated, Resident 1 has a minimally displaced left radial (one of the two bone in the forearm) shaft (makes up most of the bone length) fracture sustained around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a change in condition for one of three sampled resident (resident 1) when Resident 1 developed bruises to the left forearm and on top of the left hand with unknown origin. The facility failure has the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the necessary care and services. Findings: A review of the admission records indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) failure (when the kidneys stopped working) and dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills). A review of the nurses' notes dated 12/7/24, indicated, Resident 1 was noted with discoloration on the: left forearm measuring six (6) centimeters (cm, a unit of measurement) by (X) three (3) cm, top of left-hand site 1: 2.5 cm X two (2) cm, top of left-hand site 2: One (1) X one cm. A review of the physician order dated 12/7/24, indicated, to monitor discoloration on the left lower arm and to apply ice pack to the left wrist. A review of the care plan intervention dated 12/7/24, indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive plan of care for one of three residents (Resident 1) when osteopenia (bone density loss, weak bones) was not addressed. The facility failure has the potential for Resident 1 to not receive necessary care and services. Findings: A review of the admission records indicated Resident 1 was admitted with diagnoses including end stage renal (kidney) failure (when the kidneys stopped working) and dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills) and history of fractures (broken bones). A review of the Orthopedic notes dated 9/17/24, indicated, an Xray (a test that takes a pictures of the structures inside the body particularly the bones) result from 7/16/24 as followed: .Significant osteopenia evident along with degenerative changes about the wrist. During an interview on 1/10/25, at Assistant Director of Nursing reviewed the care plan for Resident 1 and stated that she did not see a care plan to address osteopenia. During an interview on 1/17/25, at 10:00 AM, the Director of Nursing stated that care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to train and review the performance of three out of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) when employee files of CNA 1, CNA 2, and CNA 3 lacked documentation of initial training as well as a performance review required by facility policy and procedure. This failure has the potential to result in untrained CNAs providing unsafe care that could cause harm to Residents. Findings: A review of a documented titled New Hire Report dated 10/01/23 to 11/30/23 indicated that CNA 1, CNA 2, and CNA 3 were all hired in October of 2023. It further indicated that CNA 1 ended employment on April 2024; CNA 2 ended employment on March 2024; CNA 3 ended employment on February 2024. During a concurrent interview and record review on 10/02/24 at 10:35 AM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), CNA 1 ' s employee file was reviewed. The DSD stated that after someone is hired, they will have two days of classroom orientation that includes topics about patient care. The DSD stated that this classroom instruction should be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to retain personal possessions of Resident 1, one of two sampled residents, when after return from hospitalization Resident 1's two head phones, one Blue Tooth speaker/microphone and two full Lysol disinfectant spray cans were missing from his closet. This failure resulted in depression, disappointment, and mental anguish to the resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], initial admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral region (bone infection of spine), pressure ulcer of sacral region (wound on lower back area), diabetes mellitus, heart failure, chronic pain syndrome, functional quadriplegia (complete immmobility of limbs), and history of pulmonary embolism (blocked artery in lungs). Review of resident''s MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool, indicated Resident 1 had good cognition (thinking ability), had clear speech and good hearing, required assistance to roll side to side, unable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when Resident 1, one of two sampled residents, was deprived of care and did not receive a sponge bath for one month. This failure resulted in discomfort, humiliation, and embarrassment to the resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], initial admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral region (bone infection of spine), stage 4 pressure ulcer of sacral region (wound on lower back area), diabetes mellitus, heart failure, chronic pain syndrome, functional quadriplegia (complete immobility of limbs), and history of pulmonary embolism (blocked artery in lungs). Review of resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool, indicated Resident 1 had good cognition function (thinking ability), had clear speech and good hearing, required staff assistance to roll side to side, was unable to sit, stand, or walk. Required staff assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide prn medication (as needed) on time to Resident 1, one of two sampled residents, when the resident waited for pain relief caused by pressure ulcer (wound infection in lower back) and bone infection. This failure caused the resident unnecessary pain, discomfort, and anxiety. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], initial admission on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteomyelitis of vertebra, sacral region (bone infection of spine), pressure ulcer of sacral region (wound on lower back area), diabetes mellitus, heart failure, chronic pain syndrome, functional quadriplegia (complete immobility of limbs), and history of pulmonary embolism (blocked artery in lungs). Review of resident's MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool, indicated Resident 1 had good cognition function (thinking ability), had clear speech and good hearing, required assistance to roll side to side, unable to sit, stand, or walk. Required staff assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an investigation, and results, related to abuse, neglect or mistreatment, when Resident 1, one of one sampled residents, was injured when she was dropped on the floor and her tooth was broken. For alleged violations of neglect or mistreatment that do not result in serious bodily injury the facility must report the allegation no later than 24 hours. The facility must provide in its report sufficient information to describe the alleged violation and indicate how residents are being protected. Within 5 working days of the incident, the facility must provide sufficient information to describe the results of the investigation and indicate any corrective actions taken. Any updates should be included. This failure showed no action was taken for the injury to the Residents tooth. Notice of violation was never made to the California Department of Public Health. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 1, one of one sampled resident, was assisted to obtain or was reimbursed for eyeglasses after staff lost three pairs of residents prescription eyeglasses. Resident has glaucoma and vision difficulties. This failure resulted in creating depression and additional visual difficulties for the resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney disease, heart failure, diabetes, gait and mobility abnormalities, and glaucoma. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, MDS, an assessment tool, indicated resident had no hearing difficulties, had cognitive impairment (thinking ability), required a two-person assist to move and reposition in bed, to transfer to chair/wheelchair and to dress. Resident 1 weighs 89 pounds, is 5 feet tall, [AGE] years old, and does not walk. During an interview on 7/11/2024, at 4:04 PM, resident 1's son stated the facility has lost the residents eyeglasses, at least, three times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foot care (podiatrist service) was provided to Resident 1, one of one sampled resident, when she did not receive any foot care service, e.g,, toe nail clipping, since admission, for 2 1/2 years, and has a condition that poses a risk to foot health (e.g., diabetes) this resulted in immobility, and overgrown, uncomfortable toe nails and feet. This failure resulted in neglect to the resident, caused pain, and loss of ability to walk. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney disease, heart failure, diabetes, gait and mobility abnormalities, and glaucoma. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, MDS, an assessment tool, indicated resident had no hearing or vision difficulties, had cognitive impairment (thinking ability), required a two-person assist to move and reposition in bed, to transfer to chair/wheelchair and to dress. Resident 1 weighs 89 pounds, is 5 feet tall, [AGE] years old, and does not walk.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-24 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assist Resident 1, one of one sampled resident, to obtain dental care for a facility caused tooth injury, due to fall, for nine months. Facility must refer resident promptly, within 3 days, for dental services. This failure resulted in lack of care and services for nine months to resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including kidney disease, heart failure, diabetes, gait and mobility abnormalities, and glaucoma. Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, MDS, an assessment tool, indicated resident had no hearing difficulties, had cognitive impairment (thinking ability), required a two-person assist to move and reposition in bed, to transfer to chair/wheelchair and to dress. Resident 1 weighs 89 pounds, 5 feet tall, [AGE] years old, and does not walk. During a telephone interview with Resident 1's son on 7/11/2024 at 4:04 PM, son stated in October, 2023, the facility staff dropped his mother on the floor and broke her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the result of its investigation of the abuse allegation involving two residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) on 1/29/24 was reported within five working days of the occurrence of the alleged incident to the State Survey Agency. This failure violated the federal mandated reporting time frame. Findings: Resident 1's admission Record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 1/30/24. Review of Resident 1's Skilled Charting, dated 1/29/24 at 4:36 PM, indicated Pt (patient, also referred to a resident [referring to Resident 1]) called the police [NAME] (because) pt said she was verbally abused by roommate (referring to Resident 2) . Resident 2's admission Record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 3/11/24. Review of Resident 2's Skilled Charting, dated 1/29/24 at 4:10 PM, indicated Pt (Resident 2) had an argument with roommate (referring to Resident 1). (Resident 1) called the police for being verbally abused by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to treat Resident 1, one of one sampled resident, with dignity and respect when resident waited on the nurse call light over one hour for pain medications on two successive evenings and failed to provide pain management relief, in a timely manner when resident waited over an hour for pain medication for his leg wound on two occasions during the evening shift. This failure caused the resident pain and suffering, violation of his rights and decreased feelings of well-being. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, urinary catheter, gait and mobility abnormalities, colostomy status (an opening in the intestine through the abdominal wall), and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident 1 ' s MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool, showed resident has clear speech, hearing, and adequate vision. Resident has a cognition score (thinking ability) of 15. The highest score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management relief, in a timely manner, for Resident 1, one of one sampled resident, when resident waited over an hour for pain medication for his leg wound on two occasions during the evening shift. This failure resulted in unnecessary pain and suffering and decreased feelings of well-being for the resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including diabetes mellitus, urinary tract infection, urinary catheter, gait and mobility abnormalities, colostomy status (opening in the intestine through the abdominal wall), Right leg wound with graft, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of Resident 1 ' s MDS (Minimum Data Set) an assessment tool, showed resident has clear speech, good hearing, and adequate vision. Resident has a cognition score (thinking ability) of 15. The highest score achievable. Resident has lower extremity impairment of both feet and cannot walk. During an interview, in the facility, on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their Legionella (a pathogenic gram-negative bacteria) water management program. This had the potential to affect all 229 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Legionella Water Management Program, revised in September 2022, revealed, Our facility is committed to the prevention, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. As part of the infection prevention and control program, our facility has a water management program, which is overseen by the water management team. 2. The water management team consists of at least the following personnel: a. The infection preventionist; b. The administrator; c. The Medical Director (or designee); d. The director of maintenance; and e. The director of environmental services. 3. The purposes of the water management program are to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure confidential medical information was kept private for 1 (Resident #185) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to remove visible wristbands that identified medical information about the resident after Resident #185 was readmitted from the hospital. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised in February 2021, revealed, Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: privacy and confidentiality. The policy further specified, The unauthorized release, access, or disclosure of resident information is prohibited. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #185 on 06/19/2023 and most recently readmitted the resident on 04/01/2024 with diagnoses that included abnormalities of gait and mobility and abnormal posture. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of physical abuse involving 1 (Resident #197) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for abuse to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within two hours. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised in September 2022, revealed, All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. The policy indicated, 1. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriate of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The policy further indicated, 3. Immediately is defined as: a. within two hours of an allegation involving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the use of an antipsychotic medication and physical behaviors directed towards others for 1 (Resident #197) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for behaviors and accurately reflected the discharge location for 1 (Resident #237) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for discharges. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment, revised in November 2019, revealed, Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. The policy further indicated, 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment. Different items on the MDS may have different observation periods. 1. A review of an admission Record revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to complete a new Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) after residents were diagnosed with a new mental illness for 2 (Resident #41 and Resident #164) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. A review of a facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised in February 2021, revealed, 7. In addition to notifying the resident and/or representative, the state mental health agency or state intellectual disability agency will be notified within 24 hours of a significant change in the mental or physical condition of a resident with a mental disorder or intellectual disability. A review of Resident #41's admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, facility policy review, and review of the California Department of Health Care Services Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Assessment Guide, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was accurately completed for 1 (Resident #139) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #139's Level I PASARR Screening reflected the presence of a serious diagnosed mental disorder. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. A review of the California Department of Health Care Services Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Assessment Guide, dated 01/12/2023, revealed, Section III-Serious Mental Illness Questions 10-12 This…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medication as ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #180) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for medication concerns. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised in April 2019, revealed, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The policy specified, 4. Medication are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. A review of Resident #180's admission Record revealed the facility admitted the resident on 05/18/2023 with diagnoses that included unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate). A review of Resident #180's Care Plan revealed a Focus area, initiated on 05/18/2023, that indicated the resident had impaired cardiac and/or circulatory function with risk for complications related to a history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA, stroke), hypertension (high blood pressure), and atrial fibrillation. An intervention dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised based on the needs of the resident and in response to current interventions for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1). This deficient practice does not ensure plan of care was evaluated for effectiveness to prevent reoccurrence of physical aggression that could result to harm or serious injury to other residents and staff. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (the most common type of dementia, a progressive disease beginning with mild memory loss and possibly leading to loss of the ability to carry on a conversation and respond to the environment, involves parts of the brain that control thought, memory, and language). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated 11/26/23 indicated, Resident 1 was cognitively impaired. Review of Resident 1's clnical record, admission H&P (History and Physical) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to provide goods and services such as the call lights to three residents to meet their needs by its staff when: 1) Resident 1, Resident 2 and Resident 3 were found to have their call lights not within reach and was found disconnected from the wall socket. 2) The facility did not ensure an orientation and training was implemented on general guidelines in answering the call light. These failures will result to an environment that promotes neglect. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident(s) require but the facility fails to provide them to the resident(s) resulting in, or may result in, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. FINDINGS: During a review of Resident 1's admission record dated 12/13/23, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of: Hypertensive heart disease (a constellation of changes in the left ventricle, left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for the two residents that included measurable objectives and specific interventions when: Resident 1. The call light in Resident 1's room (all three beds) was found disconnected from the wall socket and was not within the residents' reach. Resident 2. Had a resident to resident altercation. Resident B was the abuser. No care plan was developed for this resident-to-resident abuse. This failure has the potential for not meeting the residents' goals of care to meet their highest practicable well-being. FINDINGS: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission record dated 12/13/23, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of: Hypertensive heart disease (a constellation of changes in the left ventricle, left atrium, and coronary arteries as a result of chronic blood pressure elevation), chronic kidney disease (CKD means your kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should), and type 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the allegation of resident-to-resident abuse was promptly reported to the State Agency (SA, which is the California Department of Public Health, CDPH) in accordance with the facility's policy and procedure for two of four sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). Failure to promptly report allegation of abuse had the potential for further abuse to happen and thereby increasing the chances of harm to the residents. Findings: In an interview on 11/14/23, at 9:42 AM, Resident 2 was awake sitting up in her bed. Resident 2 stated, she remembered the day her roommate (Resident 3) hit on her head with her bare fist. It was lunch time when Resident 3 walked to her table, she was talking in non-English language. Resident 3 picked and messed with her food on her lunch tray, she told Resident 3 to stop and thought she (Resident 3) would go back to her bed. Resident 2 stated, she turned her head to the window and Resident 3 hit her on the right side with her (Resident 3) bare fist. Review of the Resident 3's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of assessment for one of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 1) when the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, as assessment tool) dated 9/27/23, did not reflect the Residents 1's on-going chronic pain. This deficient practice had the potential to delay the delivery of care and could result in the decline in resident's condition. Findings: Review of the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was re-admitted on [DATE]. The History and Physical, dated 7/6/23 indicated, Resident 1 was initially 'admitted due to weakness, and now readmitted for UTI (Urinary tract infection, an infection in any part of the urinary system), and the other diagnoses included, chronic pain syndrome, abnormal gait and posture, urinary retention (inability to completely empty the bladder of urine), and right leg cellulitis (deep infection of the skin caused by bacteria). In an observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Drug Regimen (also known as Drug Regimen Review [DDR], a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident, with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication) for one of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 1), who received as needed doses of Hydromorphone (strong opioid-based pain medicine), were reviewed for drug irregularities when: 1. The facility consistently administered as needed doses of Hydromorphone for chronic muscular pain without conducting a thorough Drug Regimen Review (DRR). Without proper evaluation, there was a lack of oversight on the frequency and appropriateness of administering Hydromorphone. This failure to assess the necessity of each dose could lead to potential overuse and excessive dosing. 2. The Physician's order for Hydromorphone lacked a pain scale (a tool to measure pain intensity to improve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent unnecessary use of medication for one of four (4) sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1.The facility failed to monitor and assess the effectiveness of the pain management regimen for Resident 1. Despite ongoing complaints of pain, there was no indication of adequate monitoring or adjustment to the medication regimen. This lack of monitoring resulted in the persistence of the resident's pain, indicating a failure in the overall management of the medication regimen. Resident 1 felt pain was still staying even after the doses of the pain medication were administered, it was there all the time, it never goes away. 2. Doses of Hydromorphone (a strong opioid-based pain medicine) were administered for Pain Scale (PS, a tool to measure pain intensity to improve communication and understanding about the pain a person may be experiencing) of 0/10 (a score of 0 means no pain, and 10 means the worst pain a person have ever felt) on certain days for the months of August, September, October, and November 2023. This deficient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of 47 sampled residents (Resident 2) access to communication with staff and visitors in a language that is clear and understandable to the resident when a language translation service was not available for use by the resident. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 2 feeling frustrated for being unable to communicate with staff and relaying his needs and concerns and had the potential for the 47 residents with limited proficiency in English to not have access to communication with persons inside and outside the facility. Findings: Review of facility document, titled Languages List, dated 12/19/23 indicated that there are 47 residents whose primary language is not English and are listed as needing interpreter. Review of Resident 2's admission Record, indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include generalized anxiety disorder (persistent and excessive worry that interferes with daily activities)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to notify the resident representative (RP) of one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 had a fall incident and a discoloration on his left forearm. This deficient practice prevented Resident 1's representative in participating in the planning and decision-making of care and services rendered to the resident after the facility became aware of the incidents. Findings: Review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include unspecified fall, dementia (impairment in ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), muscle weakness, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Resident 1 was discharged on 11/25/23. During an interview on 12/13/23 at 1:53 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated that after a resident fell, a new assessment is needed because of the change in the resident's condition. RN 1 stated, Yes, we should notify appropriate disciplines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-19 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to bathe or provide shower to one of four sampled residents (Resident 3) for 12 days from 10/5/23 to 10/17/23. This failure may lead to Resident 3's breakdown of skin integrity and accumulation of dirt and bacteria present on the skin's surface, increasing the risk of infection and can negatively impact Resident 3's sense of well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 3's admission Record, indicated Resident 3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include ischemic colitis (occurs when blood flow to part of the large intestine is reduced), GI (gastro-intestinal) bleeding, hydronephrosis (swelling of one or both kidneys, and diabetes mellitus Type 2 (a disorder causing blood sugars to be abnormally high). Review of Resident 3's care plan titled, Resident at risk for ADL (activities of daily living) decline, dated 3/23/23 indicated, Interventions/Tasks . Shower/bad bath per schedule and as needed . Review of Resident 3's care plan titled, Resident at risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for a resident that included measurable objectives and specific interventions when: Resident 1 's care plan was not updated when there were documentations of her having altercations with different residents in the facility. This failure has the potential for not meeting the resident's goals of care to meet her highest practicable well-being. FINDINGS: Resident 1 was admitted with the following diagnoses: Senile degeneration of brain (also known as Senile dementia is the mental deterioration (loss of intellectual ability) that is associated with or the characteristics of old age), adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that is multifactorial and may be caused by chronic concurrent diseases and functional impairments.), and dementia with behavioral disturbance among others. During a review of Resident 1 minimum data set (MDS- an assessment tool for nursing home residents) dated 10/1/2020 indicated her brief interview for mental status (BIMS - an assessment tool to assess the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and document, changes in Resident 1 ' s condition when: 1.Resident 1 ' s wound changed to Stage 4. 2.Resident 1 readmitted on [DATE], no skin assessment done. 3.The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) did not address the changes in condition for Resident 1. These failures had the potential for resident ' s condition not assessed and needs not addressed could result to resident not getting the right treatment and care. Findings: During record review and concurrent interview on 12/6/23, with ADON, nurses progress notes on June 15,2022, indicated, Noc shift endorsed stage 4 on the back, wound nurse notified, gangrene on both heels, discoloration right leg. MD ordered, referral to wound doctor. Confirmed by ADON, No change of condition assessment found, no Skin Assessment found, no IDT meeting found in chart. Review of facility document Nutrition Note, dated 6/24/22, indicated, Weight Variance and Skin /Wound Nutrition Note: declined noted more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three residents (Resident 1)when: There was no care plan on 6/10/22 addressing sacral discoloration. There was no care plan on 6/14/22 addressing mid -lower sacrum, coccyx, right and left heel wound . There was no care plan on 6/23/22 addressing the new order for Megesterol acetate (an appetite stimulant). There was no care plan on 7/3/22, when Resident 1 was re-admitted with new Antibiotic order for new Diagnosis of Cellulitis. These failures had the potential to prevent the resident from receiving appropriate and individualized care and services consistent with her needs. Findings: During a record review of facility document, admission Record, dated 7/5/22, indicated, admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Asthma Exacerbation (condition which the airways are inflamed and produces extra mucus making it difficult to breathe), Atrial Fibrillation (irregular heartbeat)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ' s order to obtain weight weekly on admission, and failed to follow facility policy and procedure, as evidenced by no documented weight on day of admission, 3/11/22, week of 3/30/23 and 4/6/23. No Monthly weights for April and May 2022. This failure had the potential for changes in condition not being assessed and identified, resulting in Resident 1 weight loss. Findings: Review of facility document, Order Summary Report, Physician: MD1, dated 3/1/22-6/1/22, indicated, admission: Weekly Weight x 4 weeks, then reevaluate one time a day every Wed for 4 weeks. During an interview on 12/6/23 at 1:50 Pm with MO, ADON 2, stated, Weights are taken on day of admission, then one week after, then weekly x 4, taken on Sundays and Mondays, for the first month. Then every month and per MD ' s order. During a review of facility document, Weights and Vitals Summary, indicated, 3 /16/22 - 107.8. lbs (standing scale), 3/23/22 110 lbs (Standing),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate that they developed, maintained and implemented a training program for four out of four sampled clinical staff (registered nurse [RN] 1, licensed vocational nurse [LVN] 1, certified nursing assistant [CNA] 1, and restorative nurse assistant [RNA] 1) when the facility could not produce documentation of orientation or competency documentation specific to the facility or resident care population for these four sampled staff. This failure has the potential to result in untrained staff that puts residents ' safety at risk. Findings: During an interview on 11/17/23 at 12:03 PM with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), a request was made for the employee files of RN 1, CNA 1, LVN 1, and RNA 1. A specific request for their licensure and documentation of orientation or competency training was made; the DSD verbalized understanding of the request. During an interview on 11/16/23 at 2:14 PM with CNA 1, CNA 1 states no when asked if the facility ever provided them with any type of orientation or on-boarding training.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of resident council grievances when two out of two sampled grievances lacked pertinent dates or conclusions/outcomes necessary to demonstrate that grievances are processed effectively, and residents are apprised of progress towards resolution. This failure has the potential for resident council recommendations to not be considered or grievances to go unresolved. Findings: A review of the policy titled Resident Council, undated, indicated that A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. A review of the policy titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing (undated), provided on 11/27/23 at 10:51 AM, the policy indicated that all grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing including rationale for response. In addition, the policy indicated that upon receipt of a grievance and or complaint, the Grievance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to care for resident's need (Resident 2), by not reporting or notifying the physician during change of condition when Resident 1 complained of chest pain and severe abdominal pain. This failure resulted in resident not properly assessed by the physician and not given the right medication and treatment. Findings: Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Supraventricular Tachycardia (irregular fast heartbeat). The physician's progress note dated 4/15/23 indicated Resident 2 was a Full Code. During concurrent interview and record review on 11/16/23 at 4:22PM with LVN 2, RN 2, the Nursing Progress notes dated 4/14/2023 at 9:10PM, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 4/14/2023 at 9:11PM were reviewed. The Nursing Progress notes indicated patient c/o(complained of) chest pain, patient refusing to go to hospital, Pain medication administered. The MAR indicated Tramadol Hcl tablet 50mg give 1 tablet by mouth…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt resolution of grievances when two out of two sampled resident grievances lacked pertinent dates or conclusions/outcomes necessary to demonstrate that grievances are processed effectively, and residents are apprised of progress towards resolution. This failure has the potential to result in a residents ' voiced grievances not being heard or resolved. Findings: A review of the policy titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing (undated), provided on 11/27/23 at 10:51 AM, the policy indicated that all grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing including rationale for response. In addition, the policy indicated that upon receipt of a grievance and or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such finding to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skills necessary to care for Residents needs (Resident 2) by not taking or reportingto the physician the baseline vital signs during a change of resident's condition. This failure resulted to not meeting Resident 2's nursing needs and goals to attain the highest practicable well being. Findings: Record review indicated that on 4/14/2023 resident 2 complained of chest pain. There was no documented evidence that vital signs (Blood pressure, Temperature, Pulse, Respiration) were taken and reported to the physician. On 4/27/2023 Resident 2 complained of severe abdominal pain. There were no vital signs taken nor recorded. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/16/2023 at 4:22PM, with LVN 2, staff claimed that on 4/14/2023, Resident 2 had chest pain and refused to go to the hospital. LVN 2 indicated that she notified FNP 1 but did not document, no assessment was made, no vital signs was taken. The Nursing Progress Notes 4/27/2023 at 8:41AM indicated ,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free of any significant medication errors when Registered Nurse (RN) 1 crushed an extended-release medication, Metoprolol (a blood pressure lowering medication made to release slowly over time). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 receiving a higher dose of a blood pressure medication at one time, increasing the risk for side effects or hypotensive symptoms (effects due to a quick drop in blood pressure). Findings: A review of Resident 1 ' s face sheet (summary of resident ' s demographic and admitting information), provided on 11/14/23 at 2:05 PM indicated, Resident 1 was admitted in the Fall of 2023 with multiple diagnoses, including: palliative care (specialized care to provide relief of symptoms from a serious illness), essential hypertension (high blood pressure of unknown cause), Alzheimer ' s (a brain disorder that slowly impairs memory and thinking skills), and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm that begins…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) was free from verbal abuse when Registered Nurse (RN) 3 told him Get out of my face twice. This failure resulted in Resident 2 stating I still don't feel safe here . during an observation and interview by the surveyor. Findings: Review of Resident 2's clinical record, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Obstructive Reflux Uropathy (flow of urine is blocked), Spinal Stenosis (narrowing of the spine), Functional Quadriplegia (complete inability to move). Review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/18/23, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a cognitive assessment tool) score of 15. Which means intact cognitive response. Review of summary of investigation, dated 9/22/23 indicated RN 3 came into his room at the night of 09/12/2023 acting agitated and frustrated with him saying, what are you ratting on CNA 4 for? and You…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report the result of the abuse investigation to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) within 5 working days in accordance with Federal requirements for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2). The alleged abuse incident for Resident 2 occurred on 9/12/23 and the result of facility investigation is not complete during the State Agency investigation visit on 9/21/23. The facility's failure to report abuse according to the required time frame had the potential to delay the identification and implementation of appropriate corrective actions and may place the residents at risk for abuse. Findings: Review of Resident 2's clinical record, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Obstructive Reflux Uropathy (Flow of urine is blocked), Spinal Stenosis (Narrowing of the spine), Functional Quadriplegia (complete inability to move). During an interview on 9/21/23, at 3:15 PM, the Administrator, stated we are in the process of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when: 1. There was no care plan developed to address alleged incident of staff verbal abuse to Resident 2 on 9/12/23. 2. There was no care plan developed to address the fall incident on 7/7/23 for Resident 1. This failure resulted to Resident 1's safety needs not being met and Resident 2's psychosocial needs not being met. Findings: Review of Resident 2's clinical record, Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Obstructive Reflux Uropathy (flow of urine is blocked), Spinal Stenosis (narrowing of the spine), Functional Quadriplegia (complete inability to move). Review of Resident 2's clinical record was conducted on 9/22/23 at 4:50 PM with Registered Nurse 2 (RN 2). The records did not contain evidence that a care plan to address the staff verbal abuse on 9/12/23. During a concurrent interview with RN 2, RN 2 confirmed no care plan was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents, for one of three residents (Resident 1) when they failed to provide the appropriate level of assistance while transferring. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining an injury to her left forehead, with bruising around her left eye area, from falling forward, while a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was toileting the resident on 7/7/23. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including end-stage renal disease with hemodialysis (kidney failure needing dialysis), Type II diabetes mellitus (high levels of sugar in the blood) and left-sided weakness related to cerebrovascular accident (stroke causing left sided weakness). A record review showed the admission assessment was done on 7/6/23. admission assessment lists Resident 1's Transferring status as 1-person assist. A record review of the 5-day Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-06-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage and distribution practice when: 1. Three of four medication carts (2 [NAME] Team 1, 1 [NAME] Team 2, 2 East Team 1) had loose tablets in the drawers. 2. One of two medication room refrigerators (1 East) had unlabeled medications stored. 3. Four of four medication carts (1 [NAME] Team 1, 2 [NAME] Team 1, 2 East Team 1, 1 [NAME] Team 2), had out of date medications stored. 4. Two of four medication carts (1 [NAME] Team 1, 2 East Team 1) had medications with unreadable label stored. 5. One of four medication carts (1 [NAME] Team 1) had medication labeled refrigerate stored. This failure had the potential for resident to receive wrong medications, contaminated medication, and/or ineffective medication. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/22/21 at 4:00 pm with RN 2, to review 1 [NAME] Team 1 Medication Cart, observed Resident 67's Xalatan (prescription medication for the treatment of high…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2021-06-28 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2b. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement its plan of action to correct the identified deficiencies when: 1. Result of the audit logs for baseline care plan (BCP), wound summary, psychotropic medication were not reviewed as indicated in the plan of correction (POC) dated 9/20/21. 2. In-services were not completed as indicated in the POC dated 9/20/21. The facility failure may result in a repeated regulatory noncompliance which had the potential for residents not receive necessary care and services. Findings: 1a. During an interview on 9/23/21, at 3:05 PM, the Medical Record Director (MRD)stated, I do the audit for the baseline care plan daily and bring them to the Director of Nursing (DON). During an interview on 9/23/21, at 3:10 PM, DON stated, I do not have a documented weekly audit. I didn't know I have to do that. Review of the facility F655 BCP POC, dated 9/20/21 indicated, .3 .Medical Records (MR) will complete a weekly audit of admission and readmissions BCP and review it with the DON . b. During an interview on 9/23/21, at 2:20 PM, DON stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-06-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure psychotropic medication is used to treat a specific diagnosis and documented condition for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 102) when: a. Risperdal (an antipsychotic) was indicated for dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills); b. Consent was not obtained for use of Risperdal; c. There is no specific target behavior monitoring for use of Risperdal. Failure to obtain consent, identify and monitor specific behavior manifestation for the use of psychotropic medication had the potential to put the residents at risk of receiving unnecessary medications that could result in serious harm. Definition: Antipsychotic are drugs used to control the symptoms (a physical or mental feature indicating a disease condition) of schizophrenia (a severe mental illness that may change the way a person think, speak, and behave). Findings: Resident 102 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (decline in memory or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control and prevention program when: 1.a Registered Nurse (RN) 3 brought out a cup from Resident 375's room which was on contact precautions (infection control and prevention measures used for diseases caused by microorganisms that may be spread easily by contact with the patient's intact skin or with contaminated environmental surfaces). 1.b. Physical Therapy Assistant (PTA) did not: (a) wear appropropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering Resident 375's room (b) did not perform hand hygiene after exiting Resident 375's room. 2.a. Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 did not perform hand hygiene during dressing changes on 1 of twenty-eight sampled resident (Resident 79). 2.b Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)3 did not perform hand hygiene [wash hands with soap and water or use an alcohol based hand rub (ABHR)] after handing dirty linen, in between, and after the care of two residents (Resident 111 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a Baseline Care Plan (BCP) for one of 42 sampled residents (Resident 276) when there was no evidence of documentation of a completed BCP. A BCP includes minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for each resident immediately upon their admission, which would address resident-specific health and safety concerns to prevent decline, injury, such as elopement or fall risk, and would identify needs for supervision, behavioral interventions, and assistance with activities of daily living, as necessary. This deficient practice had the potential to result in inadequate care and services rendered to the resident. Findings: Resident 276 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including osteoarthritis (pain and swelling on the joints) and pneumonitis (inflammation [swelling] of the lungs). During the initial tour on 6/22/21, at 9:40 AM, Resident 276 was observed grimacing while repositioning himself in the wheelchair. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit an application for Change of Ownership (CHOW) to the department. This facility failed to meet the state law (Title 22, 72201 (2)) requirement. Findings: During an interview with the Administrator on 6/22/21, at 9:45 AM, he explained that they took over the facility on 4/8/21. The name of new owner is (name redacted). He acknowledged there is no application filed for the CHOW. During an interview with the Administrator on 6/22/21, at 12 PM, he stated that the company lawyer is calling the Department regarding the CHOW application. During an observation on 6/24/21, the license posted in the facility consumer board indicated license under the name of the previous owner. The California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 22: Social Security , Division 5, Chapter 3, Article 2, indicated Application required .(2) Change of Ownership .
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility has no valid contract to provide onsite hospice care. This facility failure has the potential to negatively impact the provision of care for Resident 30. Definition: Hospice care means a comprehensive set of services . identified and coordinated by an interdisciplinary group (IDG) to provide for the physical, psychosocial, spiritual, and emotional needs of a terminally ill patient and/or family members, as delineated in a specific patient plan of care .these services are provided by a Medicare-certified hospice . Findings: Resident 30 was admitted on [DATE] under the care of (Hospice Care agency), diagnoses include heart failure (when the heart does not pump as strong as it should), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD,a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and cerebral infarction (stroke). During an interview with the Administrator on 6/23/21, at 9 AM, he stated, It should be in one of these binders. I will bring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-06-28 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, and clean environment for residents. 1. Beauty salon door was not kept clean. 2. Uncleaned equipment and residents' personal items were stored in the residents' shower room. 3. The eye wash station located in the laundry room was not cleaned. These failures had the potential to not provide a clean and safe living conditions for the residents. 1. During an initial tour observation on 6/22/21 at 8:53 AM, the beauty salon located at the first floor had a sign at the door indicating, In Use, and the entrance door was closed. The door had fixed horizontal slats on the lower panel that had significant accumulation of dust and gray-like fuzzy material. During an interview on 6/22/21 at 8:54 AM, with Housekeeping Aide (HKA) 1, HKA 1 acknowledged the observations and stated, .it's dirty . should be dusted off and cleaned . HKA 1 stated his responsibility were to clean residents' room, and called in another staff who was in the hallway. During an interview on 6/22/21 at 8:55 AM, with HKA 2,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-04-12 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure they posted the total number of and the actual hours worked for licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift, which included registered nurses (RN), licensed practical nurses (LPN) or licensed vocational nurses (LVN), and certified nurse aides (CNA) and failed to post this information at the beginning of each shift in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This had the potential to affect all 229 residents residing in the facility. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, revised July 2016, revealed, Our facility will post, on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for direct care of residents. The policy revealed, Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (RNs, LPNs and LVNs) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNAs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$41,426 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $27,378 — penalty dated 2026-06-09
- $9,110 — penalty dated 2025-12-04
- $4,938 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/08/2021 |
| CH GOLDEN HOLDINGS, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 04/08/2021 |
| CW GOLDEN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 25% | since 04/08/2021 |
| BRUCE, MARTHA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/31/2023 |
| EARL, STEVEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/31/2023 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2025 |
| GOLDEN PAVILION OPERATIONS, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| GOLDEN SNF CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| GOLDEN SNF OPCO MANAGER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| VERITAS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| BRAHIER, KATHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| PATEL, MITESHKUMAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| PONGBANDITH, BE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/03/2025 |
| SPIELMAN, SHIMON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/31/2023 |
| CH GOLDEN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| WC - DALY CITY II LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/25/2025 |
| WITZCORP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
| KOPELOWITZ, SHAUL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 36 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056394. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.