Golden Merced Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 50.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 22% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 64% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 108.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision (observation, oversight, and guidance of the individual by staff close enough to intervene and protect from harm) to prevent accidents for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility failed to develop effective interventions for falls which occurred on 7/1/23, 7/4/23 and 7/8/23. These failures resulted in Resident 1 experiencing another fall on 7/8/23 with injuries of an Intracerebral Hemorrhage (bleeding inside the brain), right zygomatic (bones on upper side of the face that forms the cheek and part of the eye socket) fracture and right clavicle (collarbone) fracture along with pain and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 7/18/23, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia (loss of cognitive functioning, thinking remembering, and reasoning), Muscle Weakness, Difficulty in Walking and Other Specified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2019-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 76) were free from accidents and injury when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 and CNA 6 used a mechanical lift sling (a hammock like cloth device used to hold the resident during transfer with a mechanical lift) past its manufactured recommended safe used by date of six months. The sling ripped during transfer and Resident 76 fell from the mechanical lift onto the floor and sustained a fracture (broken bone) of the right foot fifth toe. As a result of this failure, Resident 76 suffered a broken bone to the right foot fifth toe and was afraid to get out of bed in case of another fall. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 76, on 4/9/19, at 2:30 p.m., in Resident 76's room, Resident 76 laid in bed and stated, I stay in my bed because I fell from the sling way back. I can't remember the date I fell. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 76, the face…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of three sampled residents were safe from physical abuse when Resident 1 slapped the face of Resident 2 twice. This failure resulted in Resident 2 experiencing blood in the mouth, pain, redness to the face, and mental anguish evidenced by weeping.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 5/20/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and dementia (progressive diseases of the brain affecting memory, mood, and judgement). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Sheet (MDS, a comprehensive, standardized assessment tool), dated 4/30/26, the MDS indicated at Question GG 0170-K, that Resident 1 was able to walk about the facility independently. During a review of Resident 2's AR, dated 5/20/26, the AR indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included bleeding in the brain, muscle weakness,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement adequate supervision, care planned interventions and Interdisciplinary Team's (IDT- a mandated group of healthcare professional including physicians, nurses, social workers, and therapists who collaborate to create and manage a comprehensive, individualized care plan for resident) recommended safety measures for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident [Res] 1) who was at high risk for falls. Resident 1 had four falls between 4/19/26 and 4/25/26, including an initial fall resulting in a right hip fracture (partial or complete break in a bone, often caused by high-force impact or stress) on 4/19/26, and two additional falls within four hours of readmission to the facility on 4/23/26 and another fall on 4/25/26. These failures resulted in pain and suffering, requiring Res 1 to be transferred back to emergency room (ER) via ambulance for evaluation on 4/23/25 and 4/25/26 and placed Res 1 at increased risk for more injuries and worsening of right hip…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for one of four residents (Resident 3) when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 2) failed to get the help and assistance of a second caregiver for a bed bath and linen change, as required by Resident 3's clinical documentation, and instead performed this activity without help. This failure resulted in Resident 3 falling from her bed to the floor, causing pain, anxiety, and a skin tear to her right wrist.During a review of the document titled SOC 341 dated, 3/30/26, the SOC 341 indicated that on 3/30/26, a charge nurse was called into [Resident 3's] room by CNA [2] at approximately 10 am related to a fall related to a bed bath. [Charge Nurse] assessed resident. Resident reported right arm skin tear on [top of] wrist. [Resident 3] was sent to the [Emergency Department] for further evaluation at 10:15 [a.m. CNA 2] immediately suspended pending investigation.During a review of the document titled 5 Day Summary, dated 4/3/26, the 5…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately identify and document all wounds present on readmission when the facility did not document the sacral wound identified in the hospital discharge summary and this wound was not reported to the wound care provider.This failure resulted in the resident's sacral wound not being identified, assessed, communicated, or treated following re-admission from the hospital.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR - a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 10/28/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes (T2DM-high blood sugar), anemia (lack of health red blood cells to transport oxygen, leading to fatigue and weakness), Chronic Atrial Fibrillation (the heart's irregular and rapid rhythm is continuous), Chronic Kidney…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment and adequate supervision to prevent elopement ( a person left a place without anyone knowing or without permission) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), when the Wander Guard alarm system failed to activate when Resident 1 exited through a secured door and staff were not immediately alerted to the resident's departure.This failure resulted in Resident 1 leaving the facility unsupervised, placing Resident 1 at risk for serious injury, harm or death due to potential environmental hazards, including vehicular traffic.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a progressive state of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accidents or hazards when one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) eloped (exited the facility without supervision or staff knowledge) from the facility when staff did not respond to a security alarm timely. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to become lost, disoriented, physically injured from a fall or traffic collision, when he was found approximately 350 feet away from the facility. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled Subject: Unusual Occurrence, dated 7/9/25, the document indicated, On 7/8/25 at approximately 5:10 PM, [Resident 1] was seen ambulating in the south hallway. Approximately 10 minutes later he was reported to be in the [fast food restaurant] parking lot across the street from the back of the facility. Staff immediately responded and were able to guide [Resident 1] back to the facility. Nursing staff assessed [Resident 1] for any injuries and no injuries noted to him. [Security Alarm] system at the back door was in place and functioning.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) had elopement (when a resident leaves the facility, or a designated safe area within the facility, without proper authorization or supervision, which potentially endangers themselves) risk factors assessed when he was admitted to the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 eloping from the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record (AR), dated 6/11/25, the AR indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (also known as a type of ' stroke ' which occurs when blood flow to a part of the brain is interrupted, leading to lack of blood supply and subsequent brain tissue death; symptoms can include sudden weakness or numbness on one side of the body, difficulty speaking or understanding speech, vision problems, dizziness, and loss of coordination), problems relate to life management difficulty, need for assistance with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and security of the residents when 15 of 15 sliding glass doors (located in resident rooms that exited to the exterior of the building) were noted to be unsecured, with no system to alert staff if a person entered or exited the facility via these 15 doors. This failure resulted in one resident (Resident 1) eloping (the act of leaving facility premises, or enters an unsafe area, without facility knowledge and/or supervision) via one of the 15 unsecured sliding glass doors twice in one day, and after the second elopement was found by staff 0.6 miles from the facility in a confused state. This placed Resident 1 at significant risk for injury, including trauma from a traffic collision; and, resulted in the potential for other ambulatory residents to elope via the 15 unsecured doors in the facility, and the potential for unknown visitors to enter the facility via the 15 unsecured doors. Findings: During a review of Resident 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences for food brought in from the outside were met by warming food up when the facility microwave was removed from the resident food storage area and staff was instructed, they could no longer warm up food for residents. This failure resulted in residents' frustration and denial of food preferences not being warmed to acceptable temperatures for palatability. This failure resulted in residents not having the ability to warm up their frozen foods which lead to frustration and denial of food preferences not being warmed to acceptable temperatures for palatability. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/17/25 at 11:33 a.m. with Resident 102 in Resident 102's room, a collection of canned and packaged food was on the top right side of Resident 102's counter. Resident 102 stated he has food brought in for evening snacks, or to eat if he did not want to eat what was on the menu from the kitchen.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-21 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (a document which specified goals, interventions, and monitoring strategies for patients) for three of nine sampled residents (Residents 221, 222, and 421) when: 1. Residents 221 and 222 did not have their baseline care plans completed within 48 hours of their admission to the facility This failure had the potential to cause Residents 221 and 222 to not have their respiratory care needs met 2. Resident 421 did not have his baseline care plan for a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter- a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a vein in the upper arm used to deliver medications directly into the heart) completed within 48 hours of his admission to the facility. This failure had the potential to cause Resident 421 to not have his care needs met potentially leading to poor patient outcomes (adverse effects) such as developing infections that could lead to a decline in health. Findings: 1. During a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$83,538 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $83,538 — penalty dated 2023-09-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA