No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Golden Modesto Care Center

1900 Coffee Road, Modesto, CA 95355 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (209) 526-1775 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (209) 526-1775 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)10 actual-harm citations$182,248 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Oct 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 10 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (74) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $182,248 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-21)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1701 Coffee Rd · (209) 577-1411 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1800 Coffee Rd Ste 110 · (209) 572-7132 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1421 Coffee Rd · (209) 222-5632 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1920 Gordon Ave · (209) 577-5344 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1601 Coffee Rd · (209) 529-7346

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.0%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.5%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.8%1.6%3.3%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened34.1%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.7%13.7%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.1%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.0%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.1%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.852.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.291.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

53.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
38.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 38.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF53.6%CMS range 44.8–60.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.5–16.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge38.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified61.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge77.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.2–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.35
RN hours/ resident / day
1.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.95
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
45.0%
Total nursing turnover
80.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.76 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-19)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2019-08-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

74 citations, most serious first. The 20 most serious are shown; the remaining 54 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive systemic approach to ensure effective monitoring and systems to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 had one documented weight on 6/6/25 since being admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Staff did not complete a weight on admission and weekly as ordered by the physician, Resident 1 was not consuming meals to its entirety or refused meals, the facility was aware of Resident 1's refusal to be weighed and the Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) did not follow up with the licensed nurses.This failure resulted in a 16% weight loss of 21.2 pounds (lbs.) in two (2) months placing Resident 1 at risk for unmonitored significant weight loss that could have worsened Resident 1's diagnosed heart condition and placed her at risk for inadequate nutritional intake.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of three residents, (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with history of abnormalities of gait and mobility, assessed with severe cognitive impairment and the need for assistance with mobility, and experienced falls on 11/7/24, 11/8/24, 11/11/24, 11/14/24 and 11/15/24 and did not provide supervision and effective interventions to prevent falls in accordance with policies and procedures and professional standards of practice. These failures failure resulted in Resident 1 obtaining an acute, mildly displaced left intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures (type of break in the bones near the hip) following the 11/15/24 fall and causing Resident 1 to undergo open reduction and external fixation (ORIF- surgical procedure that treats broken bones by inserting implants), avoidable pain and suffering, hospitalization from 11/15/24-11/18/24 and ongoing physical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents according to the facility' s policy and procedure (P&P) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when the facility had knowledge of Resident 1' s history of falls and Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that causes uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination) on admission and did not provide interventions and supervision to prevent an unwitnessed fall with injury on [DATE] and an unwitnessed fall with injury on [DATE]. These failures resulted in Resident 1 sustaining injuries including dislocation (move from its proper place or position) of the fifth finger of the left hand , Right posterior (back) parafalcine subdural hematoma (collection of blood or bleeding that forms between the brain ' s surface and the covering that occurs after a head injury) a collection of blood), laceration (tearing) to the posterior head and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision and services for the prevention of accidents for two of five sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) when Resident 1 and Resident 2 were both admitted with diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing or chewing) and were not evaluated or treated in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan. Speech Therapy was not consulted, swallow evaluations (to determine the presence and severity of dysphagia as well as to determine the need for further testing) not conducted, meals were not supervised, modified meals to prevent the risk of choking and risk of aspiration (sucking food into the airway) were not served. These failures resulted in the risk of choking and aspiration for both Residents 1 and 2; and for Resident 1 could have contributed to the event on 4/11/24 where Resident 2 was found pulseless while eating and coroner's preliminary report indicated cause of death as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the resident environment was accident-free for four of ten sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, 7, and 8) when Licensed Nurses failed to follow facility policy and procedures and professional standards in developing and implementing resident-specific and comprehensive care plan interventions meant to prevent falls for Residents 2, 3, 7 and 8. These failures resulted in avoidable falls for Residents 2, 3, 7 and 8. Each resident suffered an injury requiring transport, assessment, and healthcare services at a General Acute Care Hospital (GACH). Resident 2 experienced an avoidable fall on 2/25/2023 and suffered a worsening to an already existing left proximal femur fracture (broken thigh bone), decreased ability to function, decreased mobility, disruption of healing, and increased pain. Resident 3 experienced two avoidable falls on 3/20/2023 and was diagnosed with a Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI- a sudden…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During a review of the clinical record for Resident 101, the Nursing Progress Note dated [DATE], at 3:14 p.m., indicated, Around [1:45p.m.] was notified by CNA that Resident [101] had fell out of his wheelchair in the hallway while being taken to his dialysis [appointment]. When went to assess, saw Resident [101] laying [sic] face down in the hallway wheelchair. Upon assessment noted Resident [101] bleeding from a laceration [A torn or jagged wound] to left forehead. Pressure to forehead applied. Resident awake but was not responding to writer. When asked what happened, transportation driver [TD] stated, He leaned forward and fell, I tried to grab him from his sweater but couldn't. The record indicated Resident 101 was sent to the hospital emergency room (ER) for evaluation and treatment. The progress note indicated Resident 101 was unable to answer questions when assessed by the nurse. Resident 101 was found lying facedown on the floor with the wheelchair behind him. During an interview with CNA 1, on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices were provided to prevent accidents for three of nine sampled residents (Residents 46, 29, and 101) when: 1. Resident 46 who was assessed with impaired cognitive function, poor safety awareness, impulsivity, impaired balance, and unsteady gait was not provided with two-person assistance with transfers, extensive assistance of one staff with toileting, and limited assistance of one person with ambulation and had a total of 24 falls between 1/3/18 and 5/13/19. The facility staff did not ensure adequate supervision was maintained to prevent ongoing falls. This failure led to Resident 46's twenty-first fall on 10/3/19 which resulted in a non-displaced fracture (the bone breaks either part or all of the way through but maintains its proper alignment) of distal nasal bone and uncontrolled nasal bleeding for a three-hour period. 2. Resident 29 with known diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management measures were maintained and implemented for one of three sampled residents (Resident 454) when Resident 454 yelled and moaned in pain and staff did not respond when he was calling for help; pain medication was not available upon his admission. This failure resulted in Resident 454 experiencing pain and suffering for prolonged periods of time. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Unit Manager (UM), on 8/6/19, at 8:15 a.m., through 8:30 a.m., Resident 454's call light was audible and visible out in facility hallway while Registered Nurse (RN) 1, License Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 passed by Resident 454's room and did not respond to Resident 454's call for help. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was pushing his medication cart in the hallway and passed by Resident 454's room while the call light was sounding and did not respond to Resident 454's call for help.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2019-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven residents (Resident 960) did not develop pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) when preventive measures were not put into place when Resident 960 was assessed as a high risk for developing pressure ulcers and he was not turned and repositioned for more than two hours. Resident 960 was not provided a pressure relief cushion and ongoing skin assessments were not conducted. These failures resulted in Resident 960 developing a preventable Stage 2 (partial-thickness skin loss into but no deeper than the dermis) pressure ulcer to the coccyx (tailbone) area. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 960's room, on 8/6/19, at 8:43 a.m., Resident 960 was lying in bed grimacing and stated, My butt is sore. Resident 960 pressed the call light and the Director Of Nursing (DON) immediately responded and entered Resident 960's room.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2018-05-18 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify discharge needs and develop a discharge care plan for one of 31 sampled residents, (Resident 565) when Resident 565 was discharged to a board and care home without ensuring the board and care home was capable of meeting Resident 565's needs. The facility Interdisciplinary Team (IDT, a team of healthcare providers who meet to plan resident care) did not meet to evaluate Resident 565's need for a safe discharge. Resident 565 was discharged to the board and care home which could not provide Resident 565 with required assistance for bathing and grooming. Resident 565 was transferred without adequate discharge planning, discharge teaching or emotional preparation. As a result of these failures, Resident 565 was not provided with necessary assistance to meet her hygiene and bathing needs and suffered from emotional distress from lack of planning and preparation. Findings: Resident 565's clinical record titled, Face Sheet (record containing resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-06-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff to meet resident needs when medications were given over 60 minutes late to seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents 1-7).This failure had the potential to result in sub therapeutic serum levels (medication levels dropping below the minimum needed to work), microbial resistance (bacteria becoming resistant to antibiotics), sudden metabolic or physiological instability (vital signs or blood chemistry becoming dangerously unbalanced), and complications with medications that have a narrow therapeutic range (where even small delays can make the dose ineffective or dangerous) leading to longer hospital stays, irreversible organ damage, or death.During a concurrent interview and observation on 6/24/26 at 11:22 am with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 was charting at the nurse's station. LVN 1 stated she had administered medications late because she did not have enough time to give all medications on schedule while also caring for each resident. LVN 1 stated she had worked several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors according to their policy and procedure titled, Medication Administration for two of three residents (Resident 2, Resident 4) when on 6/11/26 Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not administer scheduled medication Insulin (used to manage blood sugar by lowering the glucose) for diabetes mellitus (disorder that causes high blood sugar levels and body cannot produce or use insulin) as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for delayed medication effects, causing adverse reactions such as high or low blood sugar, dizziness, increased thirst, shakiness and medication ineffectiveness.Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 2 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were followed according to physician orders for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when on 6/11/26, the facility staff served Resident 1 a meal tray with a regular consistency (diet with no alterations) and Resident 1 had a physician diet order for soft and bite sized textured meals. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing episode of inability to chew his food and had the potential to cause malnutrition, choking, aspiration and death.Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for protein calorie malnutrition. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident assessment tool used to identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow and document recommended dietary changes according to professional standards of practice and the facility's policy and procedure titled Diet Change, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility nursing staff did not notify the physician of speech therapy recommendations to change Resident 1's diet order 0n 12/6/25. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for inadequate food consumption, choking, coughing and inability to swallow food.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Dementia (a condition characterized by impairment of memory).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set [MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant med errors according to its policy and procedure titled Medication Administration for nine of 10 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8, Resident 9) when on 12/26/25 Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not administer scheduled medications as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for delayed medication effects, cause adverse reactions, medication ineffectiveness and placed Resident 1, Resident 2, Resident 3, Resident 4, Resident 5, Resident 6, Resident 7, Resident 8 and Resident 9 at increased risk for life and safety.Findings:During an interview on 1/16/26 at 1:12 p.m. with licensed vocational nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated the facility process for medication administration included following the physician order and administering all scheduled medications at the right time. LVN 1 stated medications could have been administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to be treated with respect and dignity were followed for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7), when Resident 7 did not receive scheduled showers on 7/18/25, 7/25/25, and 7/29/25 while in the facility.This failure placed Resident 7 at risk for an undignified existence that could have resulted in poor hygiene and cleanliness.During a review of Resident 7's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for Diabetes Mellitus (DM- increased sugar in the blood), bacterial infections, kidney failure, obesity, muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure), heart failure, bradycardia (slow heart rate).During a review of Resident 7's Minimum Data Set [MDS a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan (included initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, summary of residents medication, services and treatments to be administered by the facility, and conditions and risks affecting the residents health and safety) within 48 hours of residents admission according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Baseline Care Plan, for one of seven sampled residents (Resident 7) when Resident 7 did not have a baseline care plan for diagnosis and treatment for Chronic Kidney failure (a condition where the kidneys gradually lose their ability to filter waste products and excess fluid from the blood), heart failure (condition where the heart muscle cannot pump blood effectively enough to meet the body's needs) and hypertension (condition characterized by persistently elevated blood pressure readings).This failure placed Resident 7 at risk of delay in care and needs going unmet upon admission and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-09 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' rights to access and obtain medical records was honored for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1' s representative requested medical records on 1/8/25 and the facility did not provided records within 30-60 days according to their policy and procedure (P&P). This failure resulted in Resident 1's representative not being provided medical records needed and not respecting Resident 1's right to access and obtain medical records. Findings: Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 4/11/2024. During an interview on 4/9/25 at 12:31 p.m. with the director of nursing (DON), the DON stated the facility did not have a medical records director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when on 2/20/25, Resident 1 was served a meal tray with a regular consistency (diet with no alterations) and was ordered a full liquid diet with nectar thick consistency. This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing episode of coughing and emesis (vomit) and had the potential to cause choking, aspiration and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for acute respiratory failure (lungs are unable to get enough oxygen), shortness of breath (difficult or labored breathing), dementia (disorder that causes decline in ability to think, memory and judgment),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure therapeutic diets were followed according to physician orders for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when on 2/20/25, Resident 1 was served a meal tray with a regular consistency (diet with no alterations) and had physician orders for a full liquid diet with nectar thick consistency (liquid slightly thicker than water). This failure resulted in Resident 1 experiencing an episode of coughing and emesis (vomit) and had the potential to cause choking, aspiration, and death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a resident which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis for acute respiratory failure (lungs are unable to get enough oxygen), shortness of breath (difficult or labored breathing),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 54 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication error for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was administered the Insulin (a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar level) without a physician order and diagnosis. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 experiencing a hypoglycemic event (occurs when the body ' s sugar levels drop too low) causing trembling or shaking, weakness, sweating or chills, dizziness or lightheadedness, confusion or trouble concentrating, irritability, tingling or numbness of the lips, tongue or cheeks and had the potential to result in death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR- a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2 did not receive assistance to go to the restroom and was told by CNA 1 to soil herself while in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 2 feeling humiliated and neglected by CNA 1 when Resident 2 held her urine until her stomach was in pain and urinated on herself. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 10/25/24 at 11:00 a.m. with Resident 1, in Resident 1 ' s room, Resident 1 was observed communicating using a notepad. Resident 1 stated that on the night of 10/14/24, Resident 2 asked certified nursing assistant (CNA) 1 for assistance to the restroom. Resident 1 stated CNA 1 told Resident 2, to wet her brief in bed because CNA 1 did not have time to take her to the restroom. Resident 1 stated Resident 2 was a nice person and heard Resident 2 tell CNA 1 that she was sorry, she would try harder and be a better…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow facility's policies and procedures and meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1), when staff did not document Resident 1's change of condition and post fall assessment for unwitnessed fall with injury on 9/26/24. This failure had the potential to result in the inaccurate assessment of Resident 1 and had the potential for falls and delay in care. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a summary of information regarding a patient which includes patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses for acute gastroenteropathy (Inflammation of the lining of the stomach and the intestines), abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility (movement), muscle weakness, encephalopathy (damage or disease that affects the brain),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #22 on 04/28/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/20/2024, revealed Resident #22 had severe impairment in cognitive skills for daily decision making and had short-term and long-term memory problems per a staff assessment of mental status (SAMS). Resident #22's care plan included a focus area revised on 08/01/2024 that indicated the resident had the potential for impairment in skin integrity. Resident #22's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 09/18/2024, contained an order dated 08/24/2024 for betadine-soaked gauze and dry gauze over the left big toe daily until resolved. During an observation on 09/18/2024 at 9:58 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 provided wound care for Resident #22. A small open area was noted to the resident's left hallux. LPN #1 did not implement enhanced barrier precautions and wore only gloves during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to submit a status change to a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) following a new mental health diagnosis for 1 (Resident #62) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Specifically, Resident #62 had a positive Level I PASARR and was later diagnosed with a new mental health disorder and the facility failed to submit a status change to the resident's Level 1 PASARR evaluation. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, indicated, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. a. The facility conducts a Level I PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #62 on 06/12/2020. According to the admission Record, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was complete and accurate for 2 (Resident #62 and Resident #12) of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR. Specifically, Resident #62 and Resident #12 had a Level I PASARR completed that did not capture all their mental health diagnoses. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in March 2019, indicated, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. a. The facility conducts a Level I PASARR screen for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID, or RD. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #62 on 06/12/2020. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow pharmacy recommendations for 1 (Resident #19) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility failed to respond to May and June 2024 pharmacy recommendations for an AIMS (abnormal involuntary movement scale) assessment for Resident #19. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, revised 12/2016, indicated, 17. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report any of the following side effects and adverse consequences of antipsychotic medications to the attending physician: a. General/anticholinergic: constipation, blurred vision, dry mouth, urinary retention, sedation; b. Cardiovascular: orthostatic hypotension, arrhythmias; c. Metabolic: increase in total cholesterol/triglycerides, unstable or poorly controlled blood sugar, weight gain; or d. Neurologic: akathisia, dystonia, extrapyramidal effects, akinesia, or tardive dyskinesia, stroke or TIA [transient ischemic attack]. A facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews, revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than 5 percent (%). There were 2 errors out of 32 opportunities, which resulted in a 6.25% medication error rate for 2 (Resident #5 and Resident #86) of 4 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #5 on 10/17/2022. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of constipation and rectal prolapse. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/18/2024, revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #5's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 09/18/2024, revealed an order dated 10/26/2021 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #86) of 4 residents observed for medication administration was free from a significant medication error and failed to follow vital sign parameters when administering medications for 1 (Resident #62) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 04/2019, specified, 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. An Instructions for Use for a Humalog (insulin lispro) KwikPen revised by the manufacturer on 07/2023, specified, Prime before each injection. Priming your Pen means removing the air from the Needle and Cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensure that the Pen is working correctly. If you do not prime before each injection, you may get too much or too little insulin. Step 6: To prime your Pen, turn the Dose Knob to select 2 units. Step 7: Hold your Pen with the Needle pointing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was written and implemented within 48 hours for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 9) when Resident 9 was admitted to the facility with a broken left hip on 12/16/23 with no documented care plan for Resident 9 ' s broken left hip. This failure had the potential for Resident 9 to have unmet care needs for her broken left hip. Findings: During a review of the facility document titled, admission Record, for Resident 9, dated 12/22/23, it did not indicate a diagnosis of a fractured hip. The .admission Record indicated Resident 9 had diagnoses that included altered mental status, history of stroke resulting in inability for Resident 9 to move parts of her body . During a review of document titled, Progress Notes, dated 12/16/23, at 10:58 a.m., for Resident 9, the Progress Notes indicated, .patient arrived [admitted back into the facility] via gurney accompanied by 2 emts [emergency medical technicians] and husband .hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards of quality for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not provide Resident 1 ' s Metformin (medication used to control blood sugar) for 17 days. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for a hyperglycemic (too much sugar in the blood) event which could lead to serious medical conditions including kidney damage, vision loss, nerve problems, loss of limbs, coma, and possibly death. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record dated 5/10/2022, the admission record (AR), indicated Resident 1 was transferred to the facility from a general acute care hospital (GACH), on 5/10/2022 with a diagnosis of encephalopathy (inflammation of the active tissues of the brain), transient cerebral ischemic attack (TIA- blood supply is briefly interrupted), Alzheimer ' s Disease (brain disease that slowly destroys memories and thinking skills), and (Diabetes Mellitus,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy and confidentiality rights was honored for one of three sampled resident (Resident 2) when CNA 1 used her personal phone on video, while providing bathing care and turned her phone to show Resident 1 ' s face during a bed bath. This failure resulted in the violation of the Resident 1 ' s right to privacy and confidentiality. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s, admission Record (document containing resident demographic information and medical diagnosis), dated 3/9/23, the admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident ' s diagnoses included .Covid-19 (A respiratory disease caused by a virus) .Cerebral Infarction unspecified (lack of blood supply to the brain) .Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (High blood sugar levels) . During a review of Resident 2 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS-tool for implementing standardized assessment), dated 2/23/23, the MDS indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and orderly discharge from the facility for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was discharged home with no discharge orders, no discharge summary, no home health referral set up, no Durable Medical Equipment (DME) and no medications were sent home with Resident 1. This failure had the potential to cause health complications for Resident 1 from the lack of equipment, follow up care and experience difficulties in managing their condition. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/8/23 at 2:00 p.m. with the Social Services Assistant (SSA), Resident 1 ' s Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 10/30/23, was reviewed. The OSR indicated, there were no records of a discharge order and was validated by the SSD. The SSD stated, Resident 1 did not sign an AMA (against medical advice-a document that is signed by a resident if they want to leave without a doctor ' s orders) paperwork. During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/8/23 at 2:15 p.m. with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for one of five sampled residents (Resident 2) when One of the medication for Resident 2 was left un-attended on top of a medication cart. This failure had the potential for Resident 2's medication being stolen or taken by another resident who may take it accidentally leading to harm. Findings: During an observation on 11/8/23 at 11:30 a.m., on North C Hallway, a bottle of Gabapentin (a medication to treat seizures and nerve pain) belong to Resident 2 was observed on top of a medication cart unattended. During an interview on 11/8/23 at 11:3 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 stated, medications should not be left alone. LVN 2 stated, as soon as we give it, we should put it away. During an interview on 11/8/23 at 2:20 p.m. with the Assistant Director of Nurses (ADON), the ADON stated, when nurses walked away from the medication cart, there should not be any medications left on top of medication cart. The ADON stated, after preparing the medications, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-10 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — pattern
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of four residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4) received therapeutic diets when Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4's diets were altered without consulting with the prescribing physician or registered dietitian (RD). This failure was not the standard of practice according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P), titled Therapeutic Diets and had the potential to negatively affect the nutritional health of Resident 1, 2, 3, and 4. Findings: During an interview on 10/10/23 2:53 p.m. with Registered Dietitian (RD), RD stated he assessed, developed, evaluated, and monitored the nutritional health needs of residents at the facility. RD stated residents with CHF (congestive heart failure: a long-term condition in which your heart can't pump blood well enough to meet your body's needs), MI (myocardial infarction; heart attack), and Renal (kidney) Disease were on strict diets to regulate phosphorus (a mineral that naturally occurs in many foods and is also available as a supplement), potassium (a mineral that your body needs to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide services inside and outside the facility for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2) when multiple physician ' s orders for Resident 2 were not completed. This failure caused Resident 2 to feel frustrated and helpless and not receive services per physician ' s orders. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/4/23, at 10:56 a.m., Resident 2 was seen exiting his bathroom grabbing onto the door, wall, then his wheelchair, and stepping towards his bed which he dropped himself into and then put his legs up and covered them with a blanket. Resident 2 stated he was admitted on [DATE], stating he needed help, I kept falling and spent 22 days in the hospital before [he came here]. Resident 2 stated he was supposed to be here for short term rehab and the facility did do physical and occupational therapy in the beginning, but it did not feel like very much. Resident 2 stated he was supposed to have a Neurology (a branch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to keep residents safe from verbal abuse for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was placed in a room with Resident 3 who was a known verbal abuser of staff and residents. This failure placed Resident 1 and any other residents that would be placed with Resident 3 in the future at risk of verbal abuse. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/4/23, at 11:59 a.m., Resident 1 was seen in his room lying in Bed 2 closest to the window and Resident 3 was heard behind his privacy curtain in bed 1 closest to the door. Resident 1 stated he could not walk and spent 100% of his time in bed. Resident 1 stated he had been in this room for about two months with his current roommate. Resident 1 stated Resident 3 touched his leg and he felt it was inappropriate but when he asked him to remove it, he did. Resident 1 stated Resident 3 had verbal outbursts and said inappropriate things to him about wanting to see his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow Policy and Procedure and provide adequate training for Misappropriation of Resident Property for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 did not report suspected misappropriation of resident property and agreed to be a witness in the signing of legal documents while Resident 1 was sedated and unable to consent to changes to her financial assets on [DATE]. This failure had potential for Resident 1's financial assets to go unprotected. Findings: During an interview on [DATE], at 11:00 a.m., with Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated she was notified that CNA 1 had been a witness to Resident 1's change in trustee legal documents. DON stated CNA 1 should not have been a witness for legal documents. DON stated CNA 1 should have reported the issue to the Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or social services as soon as possible. DON stated staff should have been educated on being a witness to signing of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a plan that provides direction for individualized care of resident) was developed and implemented to meet the identified needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2), when Resident 2 did not have a resident-centered care plan developed with interventions that would monitor for psychosocial effects from the alleged abuse incident. The deficient practice had the potential to result in resident 2 ' s identified care needs, to go unmet. Findings: During an interview on 7/13/23 at 11:20 a.m. with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated the alleged abuse incident occurred on 5/20/2023. Resident 2 stated while he was asleep, he was rudely interrupted by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), when he awoke, the CNA had her hands down Resident 2 ' s pants. Resident 2 stated the CNA exited the room when Resident 2 awakened. Resident 2 stated a few nights later another CNA entered his room and wanted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-17 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective QAPI program (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement-is a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement. It is a process used to ensure services are meeting quality standards and assuring care reaches a certain level) when the facility did not implement performance improvement activities in accordance with facility QAPI policies and procedures related to resident safety and reducing the risk of falls after four of 10 residents (Resident 2, 3, 7, and 8) had avoidable falls from 2/25/23 to 4/28/23. Reference F689. This failure had the potential to result in nursing staff not implementing effective fall risk prevention interventions (nursing actions taken to reduce the risk of a resident falling while in their own environment) to all residents with fall risk potential and could result in additional residents experiencing harm and serious injuries from avoidable falls. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/17/23, at 12 p.m., with the Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-17 · tag F0944 — pattern
    Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate and provide mandatory Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training to 71 of 152 staff when they were not informed of the facility goal to implement a Falling Star Program to reduce the risk of falls. This failure led to nursing staff being unable to verbalize an understanding of the facility's active performance improvement goals aimed at successfully implementing a program to reduce the risk of falls and improve resident safety. Findings: During an interview and record review on 8/17/2023 at 11:45 a.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Regional Director of Clinical Operations (RDCO), the RDCO stated her expectation is that the facility Administrator (ADM), who is responsible for ensuring that the QAPI program is executed, would communicate the facility plan and progress of the facility improvement projects to staff. The RDCO stated that when it became evident that expectations for QAPI Program activities had not been met, the ADM was dismissed. The RDCO stated that she believes that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of the resident transfer and discharge notification to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an official appointed to represent the elderly and frail's rights under public authorities) for 10 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 463, 53, 357, 72, 16, 8, 62, 87, 34, and 506). These failures had the potential to result in inappropriate resident transfer and discharge practices for Residents 463, 53, 357, 72, 16, 8, 62, 87, 34, and 506. Findings: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), on 8/07/19, at 11:56 a.m., the DON stated the ombudsman was not notified for all the residents that were discharged to the hospital. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Social Services Director (SSD), on 8/07/19, at 2:12 p.m., she reviewed the list of residents who were discharged to the hospital for the last three months. SSD stated I did not notify the Ombudsman on all the residents who got…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — pattern
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the food services staff had appropriate competencies for food safety and to effectively carry out the functions of food services when [NAME] 1, [NAME] 2, and dietary aide (DA)1 were unable to verbalize the cool down food process (a safe way to cool down food safely). This failure had the potential for untrained staff to place residents at risk for exposure to foodborne illness (food poisoning). Findings: During an interview with DA 1 and the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), on 8/7/19, at 10:27 a.m., in the kitchen regarding cool down food process, the DA 1 stated the way she would perform the cool down process would be as follows: she had four hours to cool down the food to 70 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The CDM stated DA 1 did not know the cool down food process and needed additional training to ensure the DA 1 performed the cool down process safely. During an interview with [NAME] 2, on 8/7/19, at 10:37 a.m., [NAME] 2 verbalized the cool down food process, [NAME] 2 stated food at 135 degrees F temperature should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI- a program that enables the facility to evaluate and improve the quality of Resident care and services through data collection, staff input, and other information) program when care planning issues were not identified with appropriate plans of actions developed to correct the identified deficient practice (cross reference F 656). This failure resulted in an ineffective QAPI program necessary to improve implementation of individualized resident centered care plans. Findings: During an interview with the ADM and DON, on 8/9/19, at 11:17 a.m., the ADM stated the quality assurance committee meets monthly to review past and current issues in the facility. The ADM stated the current QAPI projects in the facility were falls, restructuring the facility's infection control program, activities department resident assessments and activity care plans, and preventing drug diversion. The ADM stated the current QAPI projects were reviewed each quarter to evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was safely maintained when excess ice build-up was found inside the walk-in freezer. This failure had the potential to impact the ability of dietary staff to prepare, store, and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner for all resident, staff and visitors who were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Manager in training (DMIT), on 8/6/19, at 8:35 a.m. in the walk-in freezer, there was multiple small icicles around the evaporator fans and on the evaporator unit. The DMIT stated she would notify the Director of Maintenance (DM) to check on it. The DMIT stated if the freezer continued building up ice, freezer burn could potentially lead to bad taste on the food and the quality of food could be compromised. During an interview with the DM, on 8/7/19, at 8:22 a.m., he stated the dietary staff notified him about the build-up icicles on the fans and evaporator of the walk-in freezer. The DM stated he checked the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment in the kitchen when staff left the floor near the dishwasher area saturated with water. This failure had potential to create an unsanitary, and unsafe environment for, residents who receive meals from the kitchen, dietary staff and interfere with food services to residents. Findings: During concurrent observation in the kitchen and interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), on 8/9/19, at 9 a.m., the floor near the dishwasher area was found saturated with water without a wet floor sign. The CDM stated the dietary staff had sprayed the dishwasher floor with water to clean. The CDM stated the dishwasher floor was saturated with water without placing a wet floor sign and leaving the water stagnant on the floor could cause an unsanitary environment. The CDM stated the staff should squeegee (a flat smooth rubber blade used to remove the flow of liquid on a flat surface) the dishwasher floor area before leaving and not leave the floor saturated with water. The CDM stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS- evaluation of memory recall, mood and functional abilities) assessment accurately reflected the resident's current hearing status for one of five sampled residents (Resident 26) when Resident 26's hearing loss was not accurately documented on the MDS assessment. This failure resulted in Resident 26's hearing needs going unmet. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 26, on 8/6/19, at 8:04 a.m., in Resident 26's room, Resident 26 sat on her bed while having breakfast. When Resident 26 was asked questions, she stated, What? I can't hear you. Resident 26 stated she had been in the facility for a year and she was hard of hearing. Resident 26 stated, I am very hard of hearing. I used to have a hearing aid. My hearing aid has been in the office for eight months. I want my hearing aid so I can hear better. I have never been to a hearing doctor. I have not seen a doctor. I want to go to a doctor for my hearing [consult]. During a review of Resident 26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving hemodialysis (medical procedure of removing waste products and excess fluid from the blood through an artificial kidney) treatment received care consistent with professional standards for one of two sampled residents (Resident 53) when licensed nurses did not monitor Resident 53's arteriovenous fistula (AV- is a catheter inserted into the artery and vein to provide dialysis treatment) site in the left upper arm for bruit (a sound heard through a stethoscope generated by turbulent flow of blood in an artery indicating patency) and thrill (vascular thrill) every shift. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 53's AV fistula to clog and malfunction and placed Resident 53 at risk of delay in his dialysis treatment in the event his AV fistula could not be accessed for patency. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, on 8/8/19, at 9:41 a.m., she reviewed Resident 53's face sheet (a document containing personal and medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff followed their food thermometer (instrument for measuring and indicating temperature) calibration (check or standardize a measuring instrument) policy and procedure when the kitchen staff did not document the food thermometer temperature calibrations. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate food temperature and potentially result in food borne illness (food poisoning) for all residents, staff and visitors who were served meals from the kitchen. Findings: During an interview with the Dietary Aide (DA) 1, on 8/7/19, at 10:27 a.m., DA 1 stated the process for food thermometer calibration was as followed: she would get a glass of water with ice, dip the thermometer until the temperature indicator stopped moving and read 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The DA 1 stated the kitchen did not have a process that required the staff to document the calibration results. The DA 1 stated she had never documented thermometer calibrations. DA 1 stated since the thermometer calibrations were not documented the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2018-05-18 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietitian (RD) provided frequently scheduled consultations to the Dietary Supervisor when a lapse in the delivery of food services associated with diet provision (Cross Reference F800), following of menus (Cross Reference F803), meal temperatures (Cross Reference F804), accommodating resident allergies (Cross reference F806) and food safety (Cross Reference F812 and F925)occurred. This failure to ensure food and nutrition services systems are accurately and effectively delivered have the potential to result in compromising the nutritional status of residents through the potential transmission of foodborne illness, incorrect plating of physician ordered diets, and/or decreased nutritional intake due to residents' poor acceptance of meals. Findings: On 5/15/18 at 10:13 a.m., during an interview regarding consultations with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the Registered Dietitian (RD) stated, I leave my recommendations for the DS. I get consults (resident consults) and I address them on my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2018-05-18 · tag F0813 — widespread
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy regarding food brought by family and visitors when: 1. Residents, family, and visitors were not provided a copy of the facility policy on food brought by Family/Visitors. 2. Staff was not aware that there was a policy and was not trained in safe food handling practices. This failure resulted in the residents, family, and visitors not being aware of the facility's policy and staff not aware of the process of handling resident's food from home safely which had the potential to result in foodborne illness. Findings: 1. On 5/17/18 at 9:26 a.m., during an interview, the Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1 stated food from home does not come to the kitchen. The DC 1 stated it goes to the nursing station. On 5/17/18 at 2:31 p.m., during an observation of the refrigerator in the North station medication room (med room) and concurrent interview, there were 2 yogurt cups labeled 35B, 8 Ensure cartons labeled 44A and 2 Ensure bottles labeled [Resident 11's last name]. Licensed Nurse (LN) 11 stated, We verbally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-05-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect consistent with enhancing each resident's quality of life for two of 31 sampled residents (Residents 20 and 417) and four random residents (Residents 122, 11, 85 and 53) when: 1. On 5/16/18 staff dressed a cognitively impaired resident, Resident 20, in mismatched colored shoelaces on her shoes against the facility policy to care for vulnerable and cognitively impaired residents with dignity and respect. 2. Staff did not respond in a timely manner to Resident 417's request for assistance to the bathroom and as a consequence urinated in the bed. Resident 417 expressed extreme frustration and felt disrespected because of this occurrence. 3. Staff did not address Resident 122's need for assistance with her breakfast tray and did not remove the plastic wrapping. Resident 122 was physically incapable to remove the plastic wrap, did not eat her breakfast and felt disrespected and helpless. 4. On 5/15/18 staff seated Residents 53, 85 and 11 at the same table in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve the residents grievances and to keep the residents informed of progress towards a resolution through the facility designated Grievance Officer for six of 15 random residents(Resident 14, Resident 31, Resident 55, Resident 79, Resident 81 and Resident 86) and two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 29 and Resident 77) when resident Council members complained regarding the facility food, soup was cold, food coming out cold to the social dining room, and hot food not being served hot enough. For Resident 14, Resident 29, Resident 31, Resident 55, Resident 77, Resident 79, Resident 81 and Resident 86, these failures placed the residents at risk of not having their grievances resolved that could of improved the residents' quality of life and services received from the facility. Findings: On 5/16/18 at 10:09 a.m., The Resident Council Meeting was held at the Pinion Vineyard Room in the presence of 8 council members. On 5/16/18 at 10:20 a.m., during an interview, the Resident Council Minutes dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an orderly environment for four of 52 bedrooms (Rooms 42, 43, 44 and 45) when: 1. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bedroom trash can was without a liner. 2. Peri Wipes laid on top of the bedside table and the residents bed in Rooms 42, 43, 44 and 45. These failures resulted in a disorderly and un-homelike environment for the residents. Findings: 1. On 5/15/18 at 8:09 a.m., during an observation in room [ROOM NUMBER], a trash can did not have a liner and had trash inside. On 5/15/18 at 8:11 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview in room [ROOM NUMBER], Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 14 stated, There should be a liner in every trash container. On 5/15/18 at 11:32 a.m., during an interview, the Director of Staff Development (DSD) stated, The liners in the trash is housekeeping responsibility. On 5/18/18 at 11:57 a.m., during an interview, the License Nurse Unit Manager stated, when housekeeping leaves, it is the CNA's [Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four of 31 sampled residents (Resident 29, Resident 89, Resident 42 and Resident 71) and one of 15 random residents (Resident 4) were free from physical restraints when: 1. Resident 29, Resident 89, Resident 42, Resident 71, and Resident 4 had a position change alarm (wheelchair alarm) (alerting devices intended to monitor a resident's movement that emits an audible loud sound when the resident moves) in place without a physician's order, no medical justification, no consent was obtained from the resident or resident's responsible party and no assessment or evaluation was done to determine the need for the wheelchair alarm. These failures resulted in: 1. Resident 29 felt angry when the position change alarm [wheelchair alarm] emitted a loud audible sound every time she moved which restricted her movement. 2. Resident 89 felt irritated when the position change alarm [wheelchair alarm] emitted a loud audible sound every time he moved.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-05-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 33 and Resident 89) when: 1. Resident 33 did not have an individualized activities care plan to identify listening to music as his activity preference. 2. Resident 89's wheelchair alarm was not identified in the care plan. These failures placed Resident 33 at risk of inappropriate activities resulting in possible decreased psychosocial well being and Resident 89's care needs to not be met. Findings: 1. Resident 33's face sheet (a document containing resident profile information) indicated Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by depressed mood or loss of interest in activities), single episode, unspecified and schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), unspecified. On 5/16/18 at 8:20 a.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely revise and implement a person centered comprehensive care plan for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 71 and Resident 72) when: 1. Resident 72's enteral nutrition (nutrition provided through a feeding tube into the stomach) care plan interventions indicating the feeding times did not match the physician's order. 2. Resident 71 sustained a fall and no new interventions were documented in the care plan. These failures had the potential to result in Resident 72 to receive inaccurate doses of his enteral nutrition and for Resident 71 to sustain reoccurring falls and at risk for not having her care needs met. Findings: 1. On 5/17/18 at 2:27 p.m., during a concurrent interview and record review, Licensed Nurse (LN) 3 stated the enteral nutrition order for Resident 72 was for Fibersource HN 1.2 at 90 cc (cubic centimeter)/hr (hour) x 20 hours. LN 3 stated the enteral feeding is turned off at 8 a.m. and turned on at 12 p.m. LN 3 stated the timing is on her nursing notes she uses during report. LN 3 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-05-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which met professional standards of quality when Licensed Nurse (LN) 13 did not follow the facility's Administering Medications policy and procedure, when LN 13 stored the medication inside the medication cart after Resident 77 refused the medications and documented in the medication administration record that Resident 77 took the medications. This failure had the potential to result in medications being administered to the wrong resident and the medications not being administered in a timely manner. Findings: On 5/15/18 at 11:11 a.m., during a concurrent observation, interview and record review at the facility's south medication cart, Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 opened the medication cart and several pills were in a plastic medication cup with resident's name (Resident 77) written. LN 13 stated, It's for the Resident [Resident 77]. She refused her meds [medications] this morning. She usually takes it [medications]. She only took the Zofran [a medication to prevent nausea and vomiting] and Buspar [a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-05-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper hydration for two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 16 and Resident 29) when: 1. Resident 29 did not have a water pitcher at her bedside table. 2. Resident 16's water pitcher was not within reach. Resident 29 did not have a water pitcher at her bedside table. These failures placed residents at risk of not having sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and placed Resident 29 and Resident 16 at risk of dehydration. Findings: 1. On 5/16/18 at 8:30 a.m., during a concurrent observation in Resident 29's room and interview, Resident 29 was sitting in a wheelchair facing the window. Resident 29 was eating cheetos chips. Resident 29 stated, I am thirsty. I don't have water until they bring me one. It has always been like that. That means I don't get to drink. I don't even know where my light is. Resident 29's call light lay on top of her stripped bed and Resident 29 was unable to see or reach it from where she sat. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when the pork loin was cooked for four hours instead of the indicated [NAME] Time of - 1-1 ½ Hrs (hours) and incorrect portion size was served. These failures had the potential for residents to receive inadequate protein and nutrients in their meals. Findings: On 5/16/18 at 12:00 p.m., during an observation in the kitchen of the lunch meal service, a tray of pork loin contained a row of bigger slices and a row of smaller slices of pork loin. On 5/16/18 at 12:08 p.m., during an observation and concurrent interview with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and the Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1, the DS weighed a piece of pork loin served for 3 oz. meal - weighing 2.5 oz. (ounces). The Dietary [NAME] stated, That is a small portion. The DS weighed another piece of pork loin weighing 2.8 oz. When asked about the Pork Loin weight, DS stated, It is really not 3 oz. DC 1 stated, It shrank in the oven. The Facility document titled, hcsgwest 2018 Diet Guide Sheet indicated . Lunch Day 4 (Week:1 -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food is palatable and served at an appetizing temperature when residents complained of food being bland and being served cold. This failure had the potential to result in residents not eating their food which could compromise their nutritional status and result in weight loss. Findings: On 5/15/18 at 8:20 a.m., during an observation in Resident 109's room and concurrent interview, Resident 109's plate was still full of breakfast food. Only half of the slice of coffee cake was eaten. Resident 109 stated, The food is very bland. I like food with taste . Everyday is the same thing. On 5/15/18 at 11:36 a.m., during an observation in the kitchen, the Dietary Aide (DA) was warming up 2 plate bases (base to keep plate warm) on a base warmer. At 11:40 a.m. tray line (meal service) started staffed with one Dietary [NAME] (DC) assembling the food on plate and one DA to arrange the food on trays and put them (trays) into the carts. The DC assembled three plates with food and waited for the dietary aide to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the food allergies for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 417) when Resident 417 was allergic to tangerines and was served tangerines on her meal tray. This failure had the potential to result in an allergic reaction and negative outcome to Resident 417. Findings: On 5/16/18 at 12:31 p.m., during an observation in Resident 417's room and concurrent interview, Resident 417's husband stated, My wife is allergic to oranges, orange juice and tangerines . Look at her lunch tray it has a cup of tangerines and I told them she's allergic to them. Resident 417's lunch tray was on the bedside table with a cup of tangerines. There was no allergies noted on the meal ticket. Resident 417's husband stated, I told the dietary manager Monday the 14th, and they are still getting it wrong. The facility document titled, Dietary Profile dated 5/14/18, indicated . E. Food Allergies/Intolerances - nkfa [No known Food Allergy] . K. Likes/ Dislikes - oranges . The facility document titled, Activity Log Report dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-05-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food safely when: 1. Half a tray of bread got contaminated by a drain fly. 2. There was a 15 day old opened bag of spinach in the walk-in refrigerator. 3. One (8 pounds) and a half of turkey breast was found submerged in a basin of water. 4. Unlabeled sandwiches were laying on two food prep (preparation) tables. 5. Three frozen boxes of dough had the wrong dates (date received) on them. These failures had the potential to result in unsafe food storage and handling practices that could lead to negative outcomes to the residents. Findings: 1. On 5/15/18 at 12:22 p.m., during an observation in the kitchen, there were four flying insects by the steam table. A flying insect landed and roamed on the tray of bread that was half full and was continuously being served in the tray line (meal service). On 5/16/18 at 9:30 a.m., during an interview regarding the flying insects, the Registered Dietitian (RD) stated it had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-05-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility infection control practices were followed and implemented when: 1. Licensed Nurse (LN)1 did not perform handwashing after resident direct contact. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 did not perform proper hand hygiene before, in between, and after resident care and failed to follow transmission-based precaution when handling a resident with a diagnosis of MRSA (Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus) and after disposal of soiled linens for sampled residents (Resident 16 and 56), and one of 15 random residents (Resident 87). 3. Two of 31 sampled residents (Resident 34 and Resident 45) oxygen tubing was not properly stored after use. 4. Resident 121's oxygen tubing was laying on the floor. 5. CNA 9 did not perform hand hygiene after handling and pushing soiled linen carts and before providing resident care. 6. Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) did not perfom hand hygiene for one of 15 random residents (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were within reach for three of 31 sampled residents (Resident 76, Resident 29 and Resident 420) when: 1. Resident 420's call light lay on the floor and was out of reach. 2. Resident 76's call light lay on top of the bed while resident was sitting on her wheelchair and was out of reach. 3. Resident 29's call light lay on top of the bed while resident was sitting on her wheelchair and was out of reach. These failures resulted in the potential harm of Resident 122, Resident 76 and Resident 29 to not be able to call for assistance by using the call light in the event of need or in an emergency. Findings: 1. On 5/17/18 at 8:10 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 420's room, Resident 420 stated Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 brought her breakfast tray in her room. The lids of the food dishes were wrapped in plastic and she requested CNA 5 to peel off the plastic wrap because she would not be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-05-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of pest when drain flies were seen flying in the kitchen and landed on a tray of bread. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to the residents from drain flies contaminating the food. Findings: On 5/15/18 at 7:54 a.m., during an observation in the kitchen, an insect was flying by the metal food preparation table. On 5/15/18 at 8:08 a.m., during an observation in the kitchen and concurrent interview, there were seven flying insects that landed on newly washed bowls. When asked what the insects were, The Dietary Aide (DA) 1 stated did not know what kind of insect. The DA stated, We just sprayed last week, Friday. On 5/15/18 at 12:22 p.m., during an observation in the kitchen, there were four flying insect by the steam table. A flying insect landed and roamed on the tray of bread that was half full and was continuously being served in the tray line during meal service. On 5/16/18 at 9:30 a.m., during an interview regarding the flying insects, the Registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-05-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's change of condition (COC), transfer to the hospital and death was immediately informed to the attending physician for 1 of 31 sampled resident (Resident 115). When Resident 115 was seen at 2 a.m. in his wheelchair, unresponsive, no palpable pulse and not breathing. This failure resulted in Resident 115's physician not being fully informed of his resident's medication condition. Findings: Resident 115's clinical record indicated , the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of Hypoxemia (an abnormally low concentration of oxygen in the blood), Congestive Heart Failure (a heart condition that causes symptoms of shortness of breath, weakness, fatigue, and swelling of the legs, ankles, and feet) . Resident 115's progress notes dated [DATE] at 2:50 a.m., indicated the Resident 115 had no SOB ( Shortness of breath) and verbalized he would take his duoneb (inhalation solution used to prevent bronchospasm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-05-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility did not violate the right of the resident to personal privacy of his physical body and during the provision of his personal care for 1 of 10 random sampled residents (Resident 64) when: 1. Certified Nurse Assistant ( CNA) 5 exposed Resident 64's uncovered body in the hallway after his shower and dressing resident in front of the staff, residents passing by and a visitor watching. For Resident 64 , the facility failed to respect the resident's right to privacy during the provision of care and services which had resulted in the violation of the resident's right to be cared for in a manner and in an environment that honors the resident's privacy. Findings: On 5/15/18 at 9:02 a.m.,during an observation at the facility south hallway, Certified Nurse Assistant ( CNA) 5 wheeled Resident 64's wheelchair in the hallway and into his room with the resident's gown loosely tied up, exposing approximately 6-8 inches of the resident's back. On 5/15/18 at 9:32 a.m., during an interview, CNA 5 stated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-05-18 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a resident assessment tool used to identify resident care needs) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 89) when the use of a wheelchair alarm was not coded in Section P (section for alarms and restraint use) of Resident 89's admission and quarterly assessment. This failure resulted in an inaccurate assessment of Resident 89's MDS assessment and had the potential to result in Resident 89's care needs to not be met. Findings: Resident 89's face sheet (a document containing resident profile information) indicated Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Review of Resident 89's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 89's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (assessment of cognitive status) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated no cognitive impairment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-05-18 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Discharge Summary was documented by the attending physician and included in the resident's clinical record after the resident's death for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 115). The facility failed to provide a recapitulation of Resident 115's stay at the facility and a final summary of Resident 115's status at the time of the discharge in the closed record which had the potential to result in the inavailability of the Discharge Summary information. Findings: Resident 115's clinical record indicated, Resident 115 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an admitting diagnosis of Hypoxemia (an abnormally low concentration of oxygen in the blood), Congestive Heart Failure (a heart condition that causes symptoms of shortness of breath, weakness, fatigue, and swelling of the legs, ankles, and feet). Resident 115's progress note dated [DATE] at 2:50 a.m., indicated the resident was then seen at 1 a.m. in his bed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and assistance to maintain continency of urine to one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 417) when there was no staff available timely to assist Resident 417 to use the restroom. This failure resulted to Resident 417 urinating in bed two times in one day. Findngs: On 5/15/18 at 11:32 a.m., during an interview, Resident 417 stated, I came in on Friday . and I think it was Sunday night . I kept pushing my buzzer [call light] and no one came to my room . I had to pee in my bed, it is very upsetting . I am an independent person, I got so frustrated I wanted to scream. Resident 417's husband stated, I came in Monday the 14th and she told me she had to pee in bed because no one can answer the call light to take her to the bathroom and it all happened in the same night . On 5/17/18 at 8:10 a.m., during an interview regarding Resident 417, Licensed Nurse (LN) 6 stated Resident 417 was continent of urine and used the bedpan with assistance. On 5/17/18 at 8:18 a.m., during an interview regarding Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-05-18 · tag F0800 — isolated
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure facility staff supported the nutritional well-being for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 417) when the admitting staff did not fill out and submit a Diet Requisition (meal ticket) for Resident 417. This failure resulted in (Resident 417) not receiving meal trays for five (5) meals which had the potential to compromise her nutritional status and result in weight loss. Findings: On 5/14/17 at 11:32 a.m., during an interview, Resident 417 stated, When I came in on Friday afternoon, I was served no dinner and my husband had to go to the nurses' station and request one. Saturday morning - no breakfast, Saturday - no lunch, Saturday night - yes, received dinner. Sunday morning - no breakfast, Sunday - no lunch, Sunday night - yes, received dinner. Resident 417's husband stated, We met with Food Services and told them about what had happened over the weekend. On 5/16/18 at 8:57 a.m., during an interview, the Registered Dietitian (RD) stated when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-05-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document the physician order for life-sustaining treatment (POLST, a medical order for the specific medical treatments for a resident during a medical emergency form) in the medical records for one of 31 sampled residents (Resident 56). This failure had the potential risk for Resident 56's life-sustaining orders not being followed. Findings: On [DATE] at 4:02 p.m., during an interview and concurrent record review with Licensed Nurse (LN) 6. Resident 56's POLST, dated [DATE], indicated Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status. LN 6 stated the doctor signed the form on [DATE]. LN 6 stated there is a binder with the POLST forms at the nurses' station. LN 6 stated the binder was labeled Master POLST binder. The original POLST form was observed in the binder. LN 6 stated there was an MD (medical doctor) order for the code status. LN 6 located the physician's order in the computer. The physician order indicated a full code status. She stated she was unsure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2018-05-18 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the results of the most recent abbreviated survey document titled, Statement of Deficiencies in a place readily accessible to residents and their representatives. This failure had the potential to violate the rights of the residents and their representatives to be informed of abbreviated survey deficiencies and the facility's plan of correction. Findings: On 5/15/18 at 9:20 a.m., during an observation, a labeled Survey Inspection binder was located in a holder on the wall in the hallway. The binder contained the health recertification survey deficiencies and the life safety recertification survey deficiencies. There was no abbreviated survey document available. On 5/15/18 at 9:25 a.m., during a concurrent interview and record review, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, I don't see the complaint results in the binder. I would think it should be there. The facility policy and procedure titled, Survey Results, Examination of dated 4/07, indicated .1. Copies of all survey reports (e.g., complaint .) along…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$182,248 in federal fines across 13 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $42,114 — penalty dated 2025-08-21
  • $33,430 — penalty dated 2024-12-11
  • $60,834 — penalty dated 2024-04-26
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-25
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-18
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-09-05
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2023-08-28
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-08 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to GOLDEN SNF OPERATIONS — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.9-0.9 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 52.9+0.1 vs chain
The other 6 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CAFIVE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2023
CH CAFIVE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF61%since 03/01/2023
BARIAS, KARENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
EARL, STEVENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
SPIELMAN, SHIMONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
YENOWITZ, YITZCHOKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
CAFIVE OPCO MANAGER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
CAFIVE SNF CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
MODESTO SNF OPERATIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
VERITAS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
DICKERSON, RYANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
MEADOR, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
SOUZA, JOANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
MODESTO SNF REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
WITZCORP LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-35.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 6%Other / private 17%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$510per resident / day
operating cost
$15,506per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$378per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056301. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next