Pacific Gardens Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
577 S. Peach Ave., Fresno, CA 93727 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 188 certified beds · (559) 251-8463 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $30,654 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-07)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.4% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 4.0% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.0% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 5.7% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.8% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.1% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.9% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.4% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.84 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.19 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 461 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.4%CMS range 54.0–65.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 9.0–13.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 50.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 56.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.6%CMS range 7.2–12.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.21 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 188 beds and averages 164.1 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-02-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide required treatment and services to one of five residents (Resident 20), when Resident 20 did not receive restorative nursing assistant (RNA - helps patient regain physical skills through therapeutic care including mobility exercises, dressing, eating and bathing) services ordered by the physical therapist (PT-a person qualified to treat disease, injury or deformity by physical methods such as massage, heat treatment and exercise) once PT was discontinued on 3/6/24. Resident 20 did not receive range of motion (ROM- full movement potential of a joint) treatment from 3/6/24, when Resident 20 was discharged from PT, until 2/4/25, when Resident 20 was reevaluated by an occupational therapist (OT - healthcare professional who helps individuals improve their ability to perform activities of daily living [ADL]), a time lapse of 10 months and 29 days. These failures by PT to coordinate with RNA services to continue Resident 20's exercise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) did not develop pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) when Resident 1 was assessed as a moderate risk for developing pressure ulcers and the nursing care plan of daily and weekly skin assessments was not implemented from 1/6/24 to 1/19/24 for early recognition of skin changes and implementation of appropriate interventions to prevent pressure ulcer. These failures resulted in Resident 1 to develop a preventable Stage 3 (full thickness skin loss involving damage or death of the deepest layer of the skin that may extend down to, but not through, underlying connective tissues) pressure ulcer to the sacrum (located at the bottom of the spine, near the tail bone or coccyx) area. Findings: During a review of the clinical record for Resident 1, the admission Record (record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for eight of 21 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 55, Resident 72, Resident 102, Resident 127, Resident 150, Resident 155, and Resident 167) when:1. Resident 1's oxygen therapy (a colorless, odorless, tasteless gas essential to living organisms) was set at 2 liters per minute (L/min - a unit of measurement for oxygen flow rate) and not 1 L/min as indicated on the physician order (a set of instructions written by a doctor for clinicians to follow when caring for a resident).2. Resident 55's oxygen flow rate (the quantity of oxygen that is passing through a cross-section of a pipe in a specific period) was being delivered at 4 LPM (liters per minute - a unit of measurement) instead of the ordered 2 LPM.3. Resident 127 was administered 2.5 L/min of oxygen therapy through a nasal cannula (a thin, flexible tube with two prongs that fit into the nostrils and deliver oxygen) without a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an adequate system for reconciling controlled drugs (substances that have an accepted medical use and have a potential for abuse and may also lead to physical or psychological dependence), when the facility did not have an effective system in place for the Director of Nursing (DON) to accurately account for all controlled substances awaiting destruction in the facility.This failure had the potential for diversion (the illegal transfer, therft, or misuse of prescription drugs), mismanagement, or unaccounted medication, and the potential not to meet the needs of the residents in the facility.Findings:During an interview on [DATE] at 2:35 p.m. with the DON, the DON stated when controlled medications are discontinued, nursing staff would give the controlled medications to the DON and sign in the controlled medication binder at the nurses' station. The DON stated the discontinued controlled medications would be stored in a locked cabinet in her office…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of five sampled residents (Resident 3, Resident 79 and Resident 150), were free from unnecessary drugs when:1. Resident 3 was administered magnesium oxide (a mineral supplement used to treat low magnesium levels) medication and magnesium levels were not monitored.2. Resident 79 was administered amiodarone (medication used to treat and prevent severe, life-threatening irregular heartbeats (arrhythmia) by slowing down overactive electrical signals in the heart) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH- blood test that measures level of thyroid hormone) levels were not monitored.3. Resident 150 was administered levothyroxine (medication used to treat an underactive thyroid (hypothyroidism) by replacing the missing thyroid hormone) and TSH levels were not monitored.The failure to monitor essential labs work for these medications had the potential to result in adverse consequences and complications which could lead to serious medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent for five residents (Resident 135, Resident 167, Resident 9, Resident 46 and Resident 117), when:1. Resident 135 was not administered their prescribed dose of levothyroxine (medication used to treat an underactive thyroid by replacing the missing thyroid hormone) and the medication was left with the resident.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 135's thyroid levels dropping, resulting in symptoms like cognitive decline (gradual loss of thinking skills), persistent fatigue (extreme tiredness or lack of energy) and weakness.2. Resident 167's oxycodone- acetaminophen tablet (prescription opioid medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) was administered without a pain assessment.This failure had the potential to lead to a life-threatening respiratory depression, excessive sedation, hypotension, severe constipation, nausea, or accidental overdose.3. Resident 9,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with the facility policy and procedures (P&P) when:1. In Station 4 medication room, lorazepam (a Schedule IV controlled medication used for short-term treatment of anxiety (the body's natural response to stress, feeling intense worry, fear, or unease), sleep disorders, acute seizures (a sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in the brain that temporarily disrupts normal brain function) oral solution was not stored at appropriate fridge temperature per manufacturer's guidelines of 2 to 8 C ( C- a scale for measuring temperature) and the medication fridge temperature was 10 C.This failure had the potential to cause degradation (process of something becoming worse, weaker, or less valuable) of the medication, making it ineffective.2. 15 Insulin (injectable medication to help control blood sugar levels) pens for 10 Residents (Residents 46, 117, 170, 67, 148, 42, 76, 107, 30, and 83) were not appropriately labeled.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed for 20 of 66 sampled residents (Residents 8, 65, 84, 92, 71, 60, 98. 33, 57, 109, 102, 119, 172, 145, 78, 106, 116, 51, 21, and 58) when they were not provided mashed sweet potatoes according to the menu during the lunch meal service on 4/21/26.This failure had the potential to result in not meeting the micronutrients (referred to as vitamins and minerals, are vital to healthy development, growth, disease prevention, and well-being) in the physician's prescribed therapeutic diets which could compromise nutritional and medical status of Residents 8, 65, 84, 92, 71, 60, 98. 33, 57, 109, 102, 119, 172, 145, 78, 106, 116, 51, 21, and 58.During a review of the lunch menu for 4/21/26 indicated, baked honey glaze ham, baked sweet potatoes, and French style green beans for the following diets: regular (House), PU4 (Puree level 4), MM5 (Minced and Moist level 5), SB6 (Soft and Bite Level 6), EC7 (Easy to Chew level 7) and CCHO (Consistent Carbohydrate diet for residents with Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled residents (Resident 12) was informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner of the risks and benefits of proposed treatment when Resident 12 did not have a signed physician informed consent (a process in which a healthcare professional educates a patient about the risks, benefits, and alternatives of a given procedure or intervention) prior to the use of bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard (raised) or lowered) position.This failure resulted in the violation of Resident 12's Responsible Party's (RP - individual authorized to act on a resident's behalf regarding care) right to be informed, in advance of alternative treatment options and the risks of using side rails, which had the potential to cause entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail), serious harm,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 61), was assessed to self-administer and store mediations at bedside when Resident 61 had an expired bottle of [brand name polyethylene glycol 400 0.25% (over the counter eye drop medication used to treat dry eyes)] eye drops stored at bedside for self-administration with no order or Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form (MSA- an assessment form to determine if a resident is clinically appropriate to safely and securely store and self-administer their own medication at bedside).This failure resulted in Resident 61 self-administering and storing expired medication at bedside without oversight which could lead to duplicate therapy, medication interactions, and adverse effects.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/21/26 at 7:31 a.m. with Resident 61, in Resident 61's room, Resident 61 was observed lying in bed. Resident 61 was observed with [brand name polyethylene glycol 400 0.25%] eye drops on the center of his bedside table. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two of five sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 32), were free from unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that affect brain activities with mental processes and behaviors) medications when: a. Resident 3 was prescribed quetiapine fumarate (prescription drugs that alter brain chemistry to affect mood, thoughts, behavior, and perceptions) with inappropriate indication of neurocognitive disorder (decline in mental function-such as memory, attention or language, caused by brain disease, injury or damage). b. There was inadequate monitoring of behaviors for Residents 3's quetiapine fumarate, divalproex sodium (medication used to treat seizures (abnormal electrical activity in the brain) and mood disorders), duloxetine (medication used to treat depression (a serious mood disorder causing persistent sadness, loss of interest, and low energy), anxiety (the body's natural response to stress, feeling intense worry, or unease about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) was developed and implemented for four of 14 sampled residents (Resident 12, Resident 15, Resident 120 and Resident 139) when:1. Resident 12 had two bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed and can be placed in a guard [raised position that is intended to prevent an individual from inadvertently rolling out of bed] or lowered position) on each side of the bed in the guard position. Resident 12 did not have a plan of care developed and initiated for getting out of bed unassisted and prior to the use of the bed rails. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 12 receiving inadequate person-centered care and placed Resident 12 at risk of not having her needs met and sustaining injury from entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADL's- routine activities such as grooming, bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) was not provided for one of three sampled residents (Resident 178), when Resident 178's fingernails on both hands were long, jagged (sharp, uneven edges), and dirty with brownish to blackish dirt built up underneath her nails.This failure had the potential for Resident 178 to obtain skin-related injuries including cuts, scratches, and infections.During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/26 at 1:03 p.m. with Resident 178 in Resident 178's room, Resident 178 was observed having a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC -a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm) line placed to her right upper arm. Resident 178 stated her antibiotic was given through the PICC line. Resident 178 stated she was admitted to the facility since April 19, 2026. Resident 178 stated her nails were long, dirty, and felt like a mess. Resident 178…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for one resident (Resident 12) when when weekly weights were not implemented to track and monitor the effectiveness of interventions that were put into place such as snacks, nutritional shakes and daily intake.This failure resulted in a weight loss of 4.49 % (percent) in a month from 11/19/25 to 12/17/25, 13.48 % in three months from 11/19/25 to 2/18/26, and 9.14% in three months from 12/17/25 to 3/18/26 for Resident 12. Findings: During an observation on 4/21/26 at 8:19 a.m. with Resident 12, in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was sitting up in bed with breakfast tray on bedside table, cover off plate with a hard-boiled egg.During an observation on 4/23/26 at 10:08 a.m. with Resident 12, in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was lying asleep in bed, with bilateral mats (a cushioned floor pad designed to help prevent injury should a person fall) on the floor.During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of seven sampled Residents (Resident 12) was assessed for the risk of entrapment (resident caught, trapped, or entangled in the space in or about the bed and side rail) from bed (side) rails (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars in various sizes that attach to the bed, and can be placed in a guard (raised) or lowered) prior to installation and had a consent form (form signed by resident or family explaining the risks of side rail use), physician order, indication for use, and care plans prior to the use of side rails when, Resident 12 had bed rails on the right and left side of her bed in the guard position (a position that is intended to prevent an individual from inadvertently rolling out of bed).These failures had the potential to cause entrapment, serious harm, injury, or death to Resident 12.Findings:During an observation on 4/21/2026 at 7:02 a.m. in Resident 12's room, Resident 12 was observed asleep in bed, wearing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors, when one resident (Resident 34) was administered expired latanoprost ophthalmic solution (a medication for glaucoma-eye diseases that damage the optic nerve, often due to high fluid pressure inside the eye, leading to irreversible vision loss or blindness) for over one month.This failure put Resident 34 at risk for infection due to bacteria or fungi growth from the expired medication and at risk of uncontrolled glaucoma, leading to permanent vision loss over time.Findings:During a concurrent observation, interview and record review on [DATE] at 1:14 p.m. in nursing station 4b with Charge Nurse (CRN) 1, latanoprost 2.5 ml (milliliters- metric unit used to measure the volume of a liquid) ophthalmic solution partially used and almost empty bottle with open date [DATE] and beyond use date [DATE] was in the medication cart available for use for Resident 34. CRN 1 stated discontinued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food was prepared and processed appropriately to meet residents' needs for two of three sampled residents (Resident 86 and Resident 73) when large pieces of broccoli were not in proper form of minced and moist on their lunch meal tray on 4/23/26.This failure to properly process the minced and moist food can result in choking (when the airway is obstructed by food, drink, or foreign objects) for Residents 86 and 73 on a minced and moist diet at the facility. During a review of the lunch menu for 4/23/26 indicated, for the MM5 (minced and moist level 5 diet) the following: Japanese Vegetable Blend. soft mashed broccoli, sweet and sour pork SBMM (soft and bite and minced and moist), rice, puree bread.During an observation of the lunch meal service on 4/23/26 at 12:39 p.m. in the kitchen, Resident 86's lunch plate contained minced sweet and sour pork, rice, puree bread and large pieces of broccoli. The Registered Dietitian…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's food preference was provided for one of 20 sampled residents (Resident 26) when Resident 26's lunch tray did not include double protein (one of the many substances found in food such as meat, cheese, fish, or eggs, that is necessary for the body to grow and be strong) on 4/21/26.This failure had the potential for Resident 26 not to receive her food preference which can result in undernutrition that could compromise her medical and nutritional status.During a review of the lunch menu for 4/21/26 indicated, for the house (regular diet) the following: .Baked Honey Glazed Ham 4.4 oz (ounces- a standard unit of weight), Baked Sweet Potato1 each, French Style [NAME] Beans 1/2 (half) cup.During a review of Resident 26's lunch meal ticket during the lunch meal service, Resident 26's lunch meal ticket showed two servings of protein under the standing order. During a concurrent observation of the lunch meal service and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served in accordance with professional standards for food safety when:1. Gloves were not changed by Dietary [NAME] (DC) 2 after handling non-food items (a box made of cardboard) while making sandwiches for the residents' lunch meal on 4/22/26.This failure had placed residents at an increased risk of acquiring food-borne illnesses (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food [refers to food or beverages containing harmful microorganisms (bacteria, viruses, parasites), toxins, or foreign physical/chemical substances that make them unsafe for human consumption]).2. Incorrect thermometer usage in residents' freezer. Residents' freezer contained an oven thermometer (used to measure high heat to ensure accurate baking and identify hot spots).This failure had the potential for not obtaining and maintaining accurate temperatures for cold foods which could lead to the growth of microorganisms (bacteria) and placed residents at an increased risk of acquiring food-borne…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 18, and Resident 43) when:1. Resident 18 was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms [bacteria that have become resistant to certain antibiotics] that requires gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2 and CNA 3 did not put on the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments) prior to providing high contact care to Resident 18.2. Resident 43's nasal cannula (NC-a flexible tube with two prongs that fit inside the nostrils), and oxygen tubing (flexible tube connected to an oxygen source)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality and the standard of practice according to the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Charting and Documentation for five of five sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5), when:Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 did not document the wound (any physical injury that disrupts the anatomical structure and functional integrity of skin, mucous membranes, or other body tissues) care for Resident 1 on 12/27/25 during the day shift.LVN 2 did not document the wound care for Resident 2 on 12/4/25 during the night shift.LVN 2 did not document the wound care for Resident 3, 4, and 5 on 1/21/26 during the night shift.This failure had the potential to result in infection and delayed wound healing for Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.Findings:During a record review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 4/1/26, the AR indicated Resident 1 had a history of Metabolic Encephalopathy (a brain dysfunction caused by systemic illness, organ failure, or toxicities, rather than structural damage),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0621 — isolatedTreat residents equally regarding transfer, discharge, and provision of services for all residents, regardless of payment source
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Admission, Transfer, Discharge and Bed-Holds, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 (a veteran - someone who has served in a nation's armed forces) was denied admission for rehabilitation services based on payment source. This failure had the potential to delay recovery for Resident 1 following an Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD - a medical procedure used to examine the lining of the esophagus, stomach, and the first part of the small intestine), Robotic Ivor [NAME] Esophagectomy (a minimally invasive surgical procedure with the use of a surgical robot to remove a portion of the esophagus to treat cancer) and Exploratory Laparotomy (a surgical procedure involving a large incision in the abdomen to visually examine the abdominal organs to identify the cause of unexplained symptoms or injuries).During an interview on 8/26/25 at 11:01 a.m. with [Hospital A] Social Worker (SW), the SW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide written information on how to formulate an advance directive (a legal document that outlines a person's wishes regarding their medical care in the event they become unable to make decisions for themselves due to illness or injury) for four of 163 residents (Resident 12, Resident 30, Resident 57 and Resident 306) when the facility did not document information on how to obtain an advance directive in residents charts. This failure violated the rights of Resident 12, Resident 30, Resident 57 and Resident 306, which could have potentially prevented these residents' wishes from being followed if they were unable to make decisions. Findings: During an interview on 2/3/25 at 8:55 a.m. with Resident 30 in Resident 30's room, Resident 30 stated she did not have an advanced directive and the facility did not speak to her about formulating one. During a review of Resident30's admission Record (AR-a document with personal identifiable and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for: 1. Two of 156 residents (Resident 34 and Resident 57) when Resident 34 and Resident 57 were cold at night and staff did not ensure the temperature range was between 71-81-degree Fahrenheit (a measurement of temperature on a standard in which 32 degrees is the temperature at which water freezes and 212 degrees that at which it boils) This failure resulted in an uncomfortable homelike environment for Resident 34 and Resident 57, which had the potential risk for causing hypothermia (a medical emergency that occurs when your body loses heat faster than it can produce heat) in an already vulnerable population due to their decreased ability to regulate heat. 2. When Resident 42's wall was observed with one large hole and one small hole with exposed insulation and wiring on the wall behind the bed. This failure had the potential to result in exposure to environmental hazards…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store, and label drugs and supplies in accordance with acceptable standards of practice when: 1. Two inhalers did not have an open date and expiration date for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident 507 and Resident 36). 2. Two of four sampled refrigerators' temperatures were not within parameters that stored three residents (Resident 558, Resident 138, and Resident 506) medications. These failures had the potential to place Residents at risk of receiving spoiled, expired, and ineffective medications and placed Residents at risk for experiencing adverse reactions (define) from spoiled, expired and ineffective medications. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 02/04/25 at 3:01 p.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3 in Station 1 medication cart, an inhaler (a small, handheld device that delivers medications directly into the lungs) of fluticasone (define), umeclidinium (define), and vilanterol…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — patternProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility cook staff failed to accurately measure milk and margarine when preparing the pureed rice recipe for 12 of 12 sampled Residents (Resident 64, 505, 78, 95, 9, 96, 111, 123, 65, 93, 74, 85) with a pureed diet order. This failure had the potential to result in 12 Residents (Resident 64, 505, 78, 95, 9, 96, 111, 123, 65, 93, 74, 85) to receive reduced or excess amount of nutrients in their food potentially leading to unexpected weight loss or weight gain. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/4/25 at 10:28 a.m. with the [NAME] (COOK) 1 in the kitchen, COOK 1 measured 1.5 cup of milk using the 1/2 cup metal measuring cup three times, and the milk did not level to the top edge of the measuring cup for each measurement. COOK 1 placed a round plastic measuring cup that was larger than the width of the square block of margarine, pushed the measuring cup completely through the block of margarine leaving open areas between the block and measuring cup wall, and the margarine was not pushed down to ensure the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain safe and sanitary food preparation and storage practices when: 1. A box of potatoes was not labeled with a received date or use-by date. 2. A dietary aide failed to wash their hands after scratching their ear and continued to place clean cups in a clean crate. 3. Thawing frozen beef kabobs were not labeled with the prepared by or use-by date, was found in the walk-in refrigerator. 4. Dust was identified on the ceiling above the fan in the food storage room. These failures had the potential to cause food borne illness to a highly susceptible population of 163 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25 at 8:02 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM) in the kitchen, raw potatoes were stored in an uncovered box without a label identifying the received date or use-by date. The DM stated the box of potatoes were not dated. The DM stated all food should be dated so kitchen staff knew how long food had been on the shelf. The DM stated old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 6. During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/3/25 at 8:51 a.m. with Resident 505 in the resident's room, Resident 505 was sitting upright in bed wearing glasses, a dark blue sling cradled her right arm, and an oxygen nasal cannula and oxygen tubing were lying on the floor. Resident 505 was alert and oriented, able to state her name, date, location and was able to understand and answer questions. Resident 505 stated she did not use oxygen continuously and was not aware the tubing was on the ground. During a record review of Resident 505's admission Record (AR), dated 2/6/25, the AR indicated, Resident 505 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: fall with a left broken thigh bone surgically repaired with an artificial hip joint, uneven broken right collarbone, and difficulty breathing. During a review of Resident 505's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 2/4/25, the MDS section C indicated, Resident 505 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS-an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0924 — patternPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side of the corridor. This failure put residents at increased risk for falls when utilizing the handrail for assistance with walking. Findings: During an observation on 2/03/25 at 8:43 a.m. in the Station 2 Hallway, across from room [ROOM NUMBER], the handrail across the hall was observed to be broken and loose. The handrail next to room [ROOM NUMBER] on the west side of the doorway was observed to be missing a curved piece of wood exposing the metal bracket and screws. During an interview on 2/05/25 at 10:34 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), the MS stated the facility used the TELS System to notify his department of any issues that needed repair. The MS stated any staff could access the system for repairs. The MS stated he was notified of broken handrails, and they were repaired right away. The MS stated the curved ends of the handrails were obsolete and the facility could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided for two of 11 sampled residents (Resident 3, and 305) when: 1. Resident 3's foley catheter (a soft, flexible tube inserted into the bladder to help drain urine into a bag) drainage bag was without a dignity bag (a bag used to the cover and hold the catheter drainage and collection bag so it is not visible), leaving the urine visible to anyone who walked into Resident 3's room This failure resulted in Resident 3 not being provided his right to have a dignified existence while in the facility. 2. Resident 305's foley catheter drainage bag was without a dignity bag. This failure violated Resident 305's privacy and had the potential to affect the self-esteem, self-worth, and quality of life of Resident 305. Findings: 1. During an observation on 2/3/25 at 9:57 a.m. in Resident 3's room, Residents 3 foley catheter bag was uncovered leaving the urine visible to anyone who entered the room. During a concurrent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide residents and residents' responsible party (RP- a person designated to make decisions for a resident) written information regarding the bed hold policy for two of six sampled (Resident 3 and Resident 455) when: 1. No written notices about the facility's bed hold policy was provided to Resident 3 or their RP when he was transferred to the hospital on 2/2/25. This failure violated Resident 3 and his RP's right to be notified in writing of the facility's bed hold policy. 2. Resident 455 was not provided a bed hold policy prior to being transferred out of the facility due to being a non-Medi-Cal member. This failure had the potential to result in loss of bed availability, confusion, disputes, and quality of care concerns for Resident 455. Findings: 1. During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/6/25 at 10:53a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 3, Resident 3's Notice of Transfer (NT),dated 2/6/25 was reviewed. The NT indicated Resident 3 was transferred to the hospital on 2/2/25. LVN 3 stated nursing staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP - a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's needs) for 7 of 36 sampled residents (Residents 20, 26, 34, 37, 54, 86, and 409) when: 1. Resident 37 did not have a CP developed for an indwelling foley catheter (a thin, flexible tube that is inserted into your bladder to drain urine). This failure of developing a CP for Resident 37's foley catheter had the potential to place Resident 37's safety at risk and her specific needs not being met. 2. Resident 26's CP interventions were not implemented to meet his visual needs. This failure resulted in Resident 26 not wearing his glasses for five days which had the potential to lead to injury or decreased participation in activities of daily living (ADLs). 3. Resident 409's CP was not developed to address the use of an anticoagulant (blood thinner). This failure had the potential for Resident 409 to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 120), when Resident 120's care plan had active treatment interventions (actions to address resident identified needs) for a stage two pressure ulcer (partial-thickness loss of skin, presenting as a shallow open sore or wound) that had already healed. This failure had the potential for Resident 120's care to not be centered and could cause unclear communication amongst the healthcare team. Findings: During the review of Resident 120's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes) dated 12/8/23, the AR indicated Resident 120 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure), obesity (excessive fat accumulation that presents a health risk), and gait abnormalities ( unusual or irregular walking pattern). During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice for two of nine sampled residents (Resident 112 and Resident 306) when: 1. Resident 112 was receiving 2.5 liters per minute (LPM- a unit that expresses flow rate define) of oxygen when the continuous oxygen ordered was for 2 LPM. 2. Resident 306's oxygen flow rate was set at 3 L/min and not 2 L/min as indicated on the physician order (a set of instructions written by a doctor for clinicians to follow when caring for a resident). These failures had the potential to result in serious health conditions for the resident including oxygen toxicity that could cause damage to lung tissue and respiratory issues. 3. Resident 306's oxygen tubing was not labeled with the date the tubing should be changed. This failure put Resident 306 at risk of infection. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 112's admission Record (AR), dated 2/5/25, the AR indicated Resident 112 had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled Residents (Resident 28), received toenail care consistent with professional standards of practice when Resident 28's toenails were long and jagged. This failure resulted in Resident 28's toenails to become long, jagged, and caused discomfort which had the potential to lead to ingrown toenails, infection, and injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 28's admission Record (AR- document containing resident personal information), dated 11/25/24, the AR indicated, Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (a break in the bone just below the hip joint) subsequent encounter for closed fracture (a type of bone break where the broken bone does not penetrate the skin) with routine healing, muscle weakness generalized, need for assistance with personal care, and other reduced mobility. During a review of Resident 28's Minimum…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 37), was free from accidents when: 1. Resident 37's foley catheter (helps drain urine from your bladder) tubing was wrapped around her prosthetic (artificial leg that replaces the part of the leg below the knee joint) right lower leg while sitting in her wheelchair. This failure had the likelihood to cause a fall or injury to Resident 37 via the catheter tripping her during a transfer (movement from wheelchair to bed and vice versa) or being pulled from her bladder as a result of being caught on her prosthesis (artificial leg). Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 37's Face Sheet (a summary of important information regarding a patient which include patient identification, past medical history, insurance status, care providers, family contact information and other pertinent information), dated 2/5/25, the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the total number of licensed and unlicensed staff and actual hours worked when the posting did not represent the actual hours worked by direct care staff daily. This failure resulted in all residents and their family members to not have access to view the actual direct care staff hours and total number of direct care staff providing care daily and possibly not meeting the needs of the residents. Findings: During an observation on 2/6/25 at 2:35 p.m. in the hallway, the Census and Direct Care Services Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD) form (a document used in healthcare facilities, to track the total number of direct care hours provided to patients each day) did not contain the total number and the actual hours worked by Registered Nurses (RN), Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). During an interview on 2/6/25 3:46 p.m. with the Assistant Staff Development Coordinator (ASDC), the ASDC stated she was responsible for filling out the DHPPD form. The ASDC stated, I cannot tell…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a drug regimen which was free from unnecessary drugs for one of six sampled residents (Resident 3) when Resident 3 was administered mirtazapine (a medication used to treat depression [a condition characterized by extreme sadness]) from 11/2/24 to 2/6/24 without any documented attempts at a gradual dose reduction (GDR- a system used to slowly stop the use of medication over time). This failure had the potential of causing Resident 3 to receive unwanted side effects such as dry mouth, dizziness, constipation, drowsiness, and headaches as a result of being given the mirtazapine unnecessarily. Findings: During a review of Resident 3's admission Record (AR- a document that provides resident contact details, a brief medical history, level of functioning, preferences, and wishes), dated 2/6/25, the AR indicated, Resident 3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of depression and anxiety (a mental health disorder characterized by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident 556), were free of any significant medication errors when Resident 556's potassium chloride (a type of salt that gives the body potassium that gives the body minerals needed for the muscle and heart) 20MEQ (milliequivalent- a unit of measure) was not given according to manufacturer's instructions. This failure had the potential to cause poor absorption of the medication (meaning the body could not use it properly) and stomach upset for Resident 556. Findings: During an observation on 02/04/25 at 9:25 a.m. in Resident 556's room, Resident 556 was awake and lying down in bed watching tv. During a concurrent observation and interview on 02/04/25 at 9:56 a.m. with RN 1, Resident 556's potassium medication blister pack (a card that packages doses of medication within small, clear, or light-resistant amber-colored plastic bubbles [or blisters]) indicated, .Potassium CHL (chloride) 20MEQ TABLET .GIVE…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate and complete medical records in accordance with professional standards of practice were maintained for one of five sampled residents Resident 306, when the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST- a form that contains written medical orders for healthcare professionals regarding specific medical treatments that can or cannot be done at the end-of life) was not complete. This failure had the potential for Resident 306's decisions regarding treatment options and end of life wishes to not be honored. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:18 a.m. with Resident 306 in Resident 306's room, Resident 306 was observed dressed, lying in bed with oxygen infusing via nasal cannula (a small plastic tube, which fits into the person's nostrils for providing supplemental oxygen) at 3L/min (Liters per minute - a unit of measurement). Resident 306 stated she had been at the facility for five or six days due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2024-11-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services which meet professional standards of practice for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) did not perform necessary assessment of her assigned residents and continued to document on Resident 1's clinical record Resident 1's vital signs, pain assessment, feeding tube assessment, enteral feeding intake, and provided non-pharmacological pain interventions care she did not provide from 12/25/21 to 12/30/21 during the time Resident 1 was admitted in general acute care hospital (GACH) from 12/25/21 to 12/30/21. These failure resulted in an inaccurate Resident 1's clinical record which did not reflect Resident 1's current medical status and the lack of resident assessment could negatively impact the care of other residents residing in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing demographic information), dated, [DATE] the admission Record indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2024-11-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure license nurse perform residents assessment and document accurately according to the care provided when License Vocational Nurse (LVN 1) did not perform necessary assessment of her assigned residents and continued to document on Resident 1's clinical record Resident 1's vital signs, pain assessment, feeding tube assessment, enteral feeding intake, and provided non-pharmacological pain interventions care she did not provide from 12/25/21 to 12/30/21 during the time Resident 1 was admitted in general acute care hospital (GACH) from 12/25/21 to 12/30/21. These failure resulted in an inaccurate Resident 1's clinical record which did not reflect Resident 1's current medical status and the lack of resident assessment could negatively impact the care of other residents residing in the facility. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (a document containing demographic information), dated, [DATE] the admission Record indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions was maintain in the kitchen when: 1. [NAME] to golden-colored buildup behind the stove and floor behind the stove had accumulation of debris. 2. The floor in the corner next to water inlet, behind the ice machine, between the pantry and kitchen had soiled napkins, straw, beverage cup, wrapper, and food debris. 3. The pantry floor had dark granular substance and a dark glob (a round clump of soft substance or thick liquid). 4. The floor underneath the pantry wire storage rack had scattered debris such as utensils, jelly cups, brown paper bag, napkins, hairnet, and saltine crackers in plastic wrap. 5. In the pantry a one-foot length of vinyl base board molding peeled off and was on the floor. 6. The pantry storage counter holding a five-gallon water jugs had black substance buildup. 7. Two dead cockroach observed under the food preparation table, one dead cockroach beneath the three compartment sink area, and one dead cockroach caught in a web near the ceiling by the dishwasher. These…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program as evidenced by presence of multiple dead cockroaches in the kitchen ' s floor beneath the food preparation area, the three-compartment sink, and on the floor behind the two-hallway ice machine. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses (illness caused by food contaminated with bacteria, viruses, and parasites) in a medically vulnerable resident population who consumed food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: During an interview on 10/4/24 at 8:05 a.m., with the Ombudsman, the Ombudsman stated on 7/2024 during her visit at the facility she saw a live cockroach in a resident room. The Ombudsman stated she took a photograph of the cockroach and showed it to the Administrator. During an interview on 10/4/24 at 9:43 a.m., with the Housekeeping Staff (HS) 1, HS 1 stated she was aware of the cockroaches in the facility. During an interview on 10/4/24 at 10 a.m., with HS 2, HS 2 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2. A review of Resident #208's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 11/19/2023, with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of Resident #208's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/21/2023, revealed Resident #208 resident received oxygen. Review of Resident #208's care plan, initiated 11/21/2023 revealed the resident had oxygen therapy related to acute respiratory failure. Interventions indicated the resident received continuous oxygen at a rate of two liters per minute. Review of Resident #208's Order Summary Report, with active orders as of 11/29/2023, revealed an order dated 11/21/2023, for continuous oxygen at two liters per minute by way of nasal canula for acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. On 11/29/2023 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #208 receiving oxygen by way of a nasal canula with the oxygen concentrator set at three liters per minute. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/29/2023 at 9:19 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to assess a resident prior to self-administration of medication for 1 (Resident #114) of 28 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of a facility undated policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication, revealed, 2. If the resident expresses a desire to self-administer their medications, or a physician orders self-administration, the facility will not allow the resident to self- administer meds [medications] until the following procedures are done: a. A Licensed Nurse will complete the Self-Administration Assessment Review which includes the resident's physical and cognitive ability to safely administer and store their medication(s). Review of Resident #114's admission Record, revealed the facility admitted the resident on 09/11/2023 with diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture of thoracic 11 and thoracic 12 vertebra, spondylosis of the lumbar region, intervertebral disc degeneration of the lumbar region, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #114's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment and a building in good repair for 2 (Resident #97 and Resident #114) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for the environment. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Safe, Clean, Comfortable, and Homelike Environment, implemented in June 2023, revealed, Policy: In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will strive to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belonging to the extent possible. This includes ensuring that the resident can receive care and services safely and that the physical layout of the facility maximizes resident independence and does not pose a safety risk. 1. A review of Resident #97's admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #97 on 04/02/2022 with diagnoses that included acute kidney failure, muscle weakness, and hypertension. A review of Resident #97's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on the interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident #72) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition was provided assistance with their meals. Findings included: Review of a facility's policy titled, Weight Management, dated August 2014, revealed Residents identified to be at risk of weight variance, will have routine assessment and care plan interventions implemented in accordance with Advance Directives. The objective of this process if to assess, and manage weight variances. The policy specified, 14. Evaluate meal and intake patterns for irregularities; Consider smaller, more frequent meals, or adding calorie dense foods to meals with higher consumption. * Provide oversight of meal intake and offer appropriate substitutes as indicated. Post available substitutes in designated area for staff awareness. * Evaluate level of assistance /supervision needs. Determine if restorative dining, social dining or additional dining assistance during meals is indicated. Review of Resident #72's admission Record revealed the facility admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$30,654 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $30,654 — penalty dated 2025-02-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COVENANT CARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVENANT CARE CALIFORNIA, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT CARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE CAPITAL INVESTORS V, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (B), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (Q), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (S), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND, L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT SUBCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| STATE TREASURER OF MICH CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPL RTMNT SYSTEMS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| STOCKWELL FUND II LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| EVANS, MARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| LEVIN, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| SIMS, CHRISTINE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| TOROK, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 02/20/2014 |
| ASHLEY, DAVA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/26/2018 |
| CARNEY, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2013 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/17/2018 |
| SPARKS, CAROL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/17/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056207. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.