Buena Vista Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 163 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 68.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 120.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent elopement for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1, who was assessed as an elopement risk and provided with a Wander Guard (device that alarms), left the facility unmonitored. This failure placed Resident 1 at risk for injury or death. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 10/2/25, the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes unspecified Schizophrenia (a chronic mental health condition that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors) and anxiety disorder (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, reflecting moderate cognitive impairment with episodes of forgetfulness. Further reviews showed Resident 1 was independent with mobility, specifically walking, and used a Wander Guard…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a plan that includes clear goals to meet a resident's needs) in one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) with known alcohol dependence (a chronic disease in which a person craves alcoholic drinks and is unable to control his or her drinking), alcohol abuse and opioid dependence (the persistent urge to use legal and illegal drugs that reduce the intensity of pain signals). These failures had the potential of Resident 1 not having the coping mechanisms and support needed to prevent the use of illicit drug use (drugs that are illegal to produce, sell, or possess, or use in an illegal or inappropriate manner) and resulted in Resident 1 having a heroin (highly addictive, illegal opioid drug with high potential for abuse and no accepted medical use) drug overdose.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), [undated], the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow physician orders related to the monitoring of blood glucose levels for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 11) when there were no documentation to indicate if blood sugar testing was done as ordered on days missed. This failure has the potential to lead to medication error that can lead to severe hypoglycemia (low blood sugar).During a review of the facility's Face Sheet (admission record), Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus([DM] abnormal blood sugar).During a review of Resident 11's Physician Orders (PO), dated 10/6/25, the PO indicated to administer Insulin Glargine solostar pen-injection 100 unit/ml (milliliter). Inject 22 units at bedtime for DM.During a review of Resident 11's Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/26, there was no documentation to show the blood sugar was taken to obtain blood sugar levels for the 9 p.m., evening dose on 4/1/26, 4/3/26,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow established policies regarding the storage of pharmaceutical products when a medication storage room was equipped with a single-door refrigerator/freezer unit, rather than a pharmacy-grade, two door unit with separate freezer compartment and door, when combine.This failure has the potential to lead to inconsistent temperatures and compromise the potency of stored medications when inuse. During an observation of the medication storage room in Station A on 4/8/26 at 9:14 a.m., a refrigerator used for medication storage had a single door for both freezer and refrigerator. The freezer was observed to have ice buildup.During the interview on 4/9/26 at 2:38 p.m. with the administrator (ADM), ADM stated that the facility does not store medication in the freezer. The ADM also stated that the facility's policy was to provide a pharmacy grade refrigerator specifically for medications to preserve their efficacy. The ADM acknowledged that there should have been separate doors for the freezer and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-10 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the dietary prescription of 1 unsampled resident (Resident 129).This failure had the potential for Resident 129 to have health complications.During a review of the facility's Face Sheet (admission record), Resident 129 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Kidney Failure, unspecified (a sudden loss of kidney function).During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/8/26 at 6:18 a.m., with the Dietary Manager (DM) during tray line, the meal ticket for Resident 129 indicated in part Regular, Fluid Restriction 1500 ml Thin Liquids and Renal Diet. The tray was observed with a salt packet, this observation was validated by the DM and stated will double check the dietary prescription.During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/08/26 at 2:15 p.m., with the Dietician (DIT), the dietary order for Resident 129, was reviewed. The Dietary order indicated in part, No added Salt.During a review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food safety is maintained when an outdated bottle of juice was left in the refrigerator and spoiled produce were left for use and not discarded. This failure had the potential to expose residents to foodborne illnesses (diseases that are caused by eating contaminated food).During a concurrent observation and interview in the facility kitchen on 4/8/26 at 6:07 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), a bottle of juice was observed in the refrigerator that had a best by date of 4/1/26. During a concurrent observation and interview on 4/8/26 at 6:11 a.m. at the facility kitchen with the DM, cucumbers were noted to have had mold and to be mushy (an unpleasant, stale, or damp smell caused by mold or mildew). DM verbalized that the person responsible for receiving the produce should inspect the foods before storage or use.During a review of Policies and Procedures titled Storing Produce dated 2003, the Storing Produce indicated in part 1. Check boxes of fruit and vegetables for rotten, spoiled items. Throw away…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses (LNs) completed wound assessments and developed a care plan that included treatment and monitoring of a surgical incision for 1 of three sampled residents (Resident 1) upon admission to the facility.This failure had the potential to result in delayed healing and infection to Resident 1's surgical wound. During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/10/24, the H&P indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included post fall, had a subdural hematoma (collection of blood between brain and outer surface), and status post craniotomy (surgical procedure that temporarily removes part of skull).During a review of Resident 1's Progress Notes (PN), dated 12/6/24, this indicated, Body assessment done upon admission and noted the following: Right head surgical incision.Skin issue: #001: New skin issue. Location: Right temporal area. Laterality/Orientation: Right. Issue type:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-10-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform daily functional testing of the Wander Guard system (an alert system worn on a resident's wrist that activates an audible alarm when passing doors equipped with sensors to prevent unsafe wandering) per manufacturer's instruction for use.This failure had the potential for seven residents using Wander Guard devices to elope from the facility without being detected.During the interview on 10/2/25 at 4:30 p.m. with licensed nurse (LN 2), LN 2 verified that Wander Guard devices are checked for functionality by nursing staff weekly every Thursday.During an interview on 10/2/25 at 5:00 p.m. with Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated there are seven (7) residents using Wander Guard devices and confirmed that the devices were checked weekly and not checked daily with results documented in the medical record.During a review of Wander Guard instructions for use, dated 2023, indicated, the devices should be tested daily thereafter, with results documented in the medical record. During the review of the facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided for one of two sampled residents (Resident 2).This failure had the potential for Resident 2 and other residents to have unrelieved and/or uncontrollable pain. Findings:During the interview on 8/14/25 at 10:10 a.m. with Resident 2, Resident 2 stated she had her last dose of pain medication on 6/27/25 at noon in the hospital but did not get anything for pain from the nursing home until the next day and was told by a staff that your medication has not arrived yet.Resident 2's health record revealed the following:admission Record (Face Sheet) indicated Resident 2 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of aftercare following joint replacement surgery. The Minimum Data Set (MDS- a tool for assessing the health and functional capabilities of residents in the nursing home) facilities section Cognitive (C) indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- cognitive screening tool to assess memory and orientation in nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff verified the accuracy of a physician's order in one of 2 residents' medical record (Resident 1). Resident 1 had an order of NPO (nothing by mouth) and another order was to give medication by mouth. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for medication related adverse events and complications. Findings: During Resident 1's review of health records: a. admission record, indicated an initial admission on [DATE], readmission on [DATE] with diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) following cerebral infarction (a blockage of blood supply to the brain). b. An MDS (comprehensive assessment) on swallowing and nutrition dated 3/12/25 indicated Resident 1 had a feeding tube (a way of providing nutritional needs by way of a tube that is connected straight to resident's stomach). c. Physician's order dated 4/4/25 indicated diet order as NPO. d. Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated April 2025 indicated an order of: *…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a restroom in good repair for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to deny Resident 1 with a homelike environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 3/20/25, beginning at 11:55 a.m., with the Housekeeping Supervisor (HS 1) and Maintenance Assistant (MA 1), Resident 1's restroom was toured. Inside the restroom there was peeling paint, and inoperable ceiling fan, a toilet seat partially without its outer coating, and a loose toilet lever. The HS 1 and MA 1 verbalized and confirmed there was peeling paint, an inoperable ceiling fan, a loose toilet lever and a toilet seat the was partially without its outer coating in Resident 1's restroom. The HS 1 verbalized there were no current work orders in the facility's maintenance system for these issues to be addressed by the maintenance department and they needed to be fixed. During a review of the facility's policy titled Preventative Maintenance dated 8/14, indicated in part The Maintenance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1. Feeding assistance needs for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). 2. Pressure injury care and prevention for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience weight loss and progression of pressure ulcers. Findings: During a review of the admission record (AR) for Resident 1, dated 2/25/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left side (weakness or paralysis following blood flow being blocked in brain causing tissue death), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), unspecified glaucoma (eye disease causing vision loss). During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Care Plan, Comprehensive dated 2008, the policy indicated in part .The care plan is directed toward achieving and maintaining optimal status of health,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to COVENANT CARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA