Huntington Park Nursing Center
6425 Miles Avenue, Huntington Park, CA 90255 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 99 certified beds · (213) 589-5941 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.4% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 4.0% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.9% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 0.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 32.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.59 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.62 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
32.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 39 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 32.4%CMS range 21.1–46.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.2%CMS range 7.1–15.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.5–12.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.61 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 95.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.01 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 4), who had a sacrococcygeal (tailbone) wound, received the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan by failing to ensure the topical medication ordered by the physician was administered by a licensed nursing personnel and was not left at the bedside, unattended. This failure had the potential for Resident 4's wound to worsen and placed other residents at risk for accidental ingestion, leading to complications and hospitalization. Findings: During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses included pressure ulcer of sacral region unstageable (full-thickness wound obscured by slough or eschar, making the true depth and tissue involvement impossible to assess until debridement occurs), Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician for one of five sampled residents (Resident 4), who had a purple skin discoloration on the right upper arm. This deficient practice resulted in the physician being unaware of the resident's condition and had the potential to delay the care and services the resident will need.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 2/24/2026 at 11:40 a.m., with Resident 4 in her room, Resident 4 was observed with a purple skin discoloration on her right upper arm, measuring approximately, more than an inch. Resident 4 stated, I am not sure why I have the bruise. Maybe when I went to the bathroom the other day, I hit myself in the bathroom. Resident 4 stated she was not sure if the nurse was aware of the bruise and that the nurses had not applied anything to it. During a review of Resident 4's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 4's diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents ' (Resident 2) pain medication was reordered from the pharmacy at least seven (7) days in advance, as indicated in the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy. This deficient practice placed Resident 2 without the pain medicine available when needed resulting in the resident ' s discomfort and risk for severe pain. This deficient practice had the potential to affect in maintaining the resident ' s highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnoses including chronic pain (persistent pain that lasts longer than 3 to 6 months, extending beyond the typical healing time for an injury or illness), pressure ulcer (wound) of left buttocks, stage 4 (a severe, deep wound extending into muscle,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary food storage practices for 84 out of 84 residents when: 1. The inside gasket of the kitchen ice machine was not clean. 2. One container of gelatin mix powder was not labeled with use-by date and content. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) in all residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 5/6/2025 at 9:56 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), in the kitchen, the inside gasket of the ice machine was observed with yellow and white buildup. The DS stated the buildup was water residual and should not be inside the ice machine. The DS stated the buildup could cause contamination that could make residents sick. The DS stated the residents might experience nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. The DS stated she was responsible for ensuring the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 23 sampled residents' (Resident 45) call light was within reach. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay and the inability for Resident 45 to obtain care and services from the facility's staff. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 45 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 45's diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication due to problems with thinking and processing information, rather than just speech or language issues), generalized muscle weakness (feeling weak throughout the body), and dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 45's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident assessment tool), dated 4/8/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 45's cognition (process of thinking) was moderately impaired. The MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of four sampled residents' (Residents 33, 70, and 32) low air loss mattresses (LALM, a mattress designed to distribute body weight over a broad surface area to help prevent skin breakdown) were accurately set to their weight. This deficient practice had the potential to cause the avoidable development and/or worsening of pressure ulcers (PU, localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence) and the complications associated with impaired skin integrity. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 70's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 70 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the right dominant side following a cerebral infarct (also known as stroke, a loss of blood flow to a part of the brain), respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer hydralazine (antihypertensive medication used to treat high blood pressure [BP]) within the ordered parameters (specific instructions that dictate whether the medication is safe to administer) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 33). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 33 becoming hypotensive (low blood pressure) that could cause altered level of consciousness ([ALOC], a state of reduced alertness or inability to arouse), confusion, nausea, vomiting, and weakness. Findings: During a review of Resident 33's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 33's diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) affecting the left non-dominant side following a cerebral infarction and essential hypertension (elevated blood pressure not due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention control program for three out of four sampled residents (Residents 21, 70, and 242) when the facility failed to: 1. Ensure Resident 21 did not reuse an indwelling urinary catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder to drain or collect urine) drainage bag. 2. Change Resident 70's oral suction (procedure involving the removal of secretions from the mouth using a suction device) cannister (container to collect fluids and secretions removed from the mouth). 3. Ensure Resident 242's indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag and tubing did not touch the floor. These deficient practices had the potential to result in the spread of bacteria through Resident 21 and 242's urinary catheter to result in a urinary tract infection ([UTI], an infection in the bladder/urinary tract). These deficient practices had the potential to result in Resident 70 developing a respiratory infection. Findings: a. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the physician and the responsible party (RP) of a significant change in condition (COC), related to decline in mobility and ([ADLs]- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 72). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a delay in medical assessment and treatment for Resident 72 and placing the resident at risk of significant decline in functional status, including total dependency for mobility, and increased dependency in ([ADLs]- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing, and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). Cross Reference F688 Findings: During a review of Resident 72's admission Record (Face Sheet),the Face Sheet indicated Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool), for two of six sampled residents (Residents 9, and 3) was accurately coded to reflect Residents 9 and 3's oral and/or dental status. This deficient practice resulted in incorrect data transmitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) regarding Resident 9 and 3's dental status and had the potential to negatively affect residents' care plan and delivery of necessary care and services. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 9's Face Sheet (front page of the chart that contains a summary of basic information about the resident), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinson's disease (a progressive disease of the nervous system marked by tremor, muscular rigidity, and slow, imprecise movements), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), diabetes mellitus ([DM] -a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for one of 11 residents (Resident 7) by failing to keep Resident 7's fingernails clean and neat. This failure had the potential to result in a negative impact on Resident 7's quality of life and self-esteem. This failure also had the potential for the development of infection. Findings: During an observation on 5/5/2025 at 11:50 a.m., in the activity room, observed Resident 7's fingernails were long with yellow and brown substance underneath. During an observation on 5/6/2025 at 8:15 a.m., in Resident 7's room, observed Resident 7's fingernails were long with yellow and brown substance underneath. During an observation on 5/7/2025 at 1:31 p.m., in the facility's hallway, observed Resident 7's fingernails long with yellow and brown substance underneath. During a review of Resident 7's admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 7 was originally admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for physical therapy ([PT]- healthcare specialty focuses on restoring, maintaining, and improving a resident ability to move and function) and occupational therapy ([OT]- a healthcare specialty that helps a resident improve the ability to perform daily activities) services were implemented timely for one of six sampled residents (Resident 72). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a significant decline in Resident 72's functional status, including total dependency for mobility, and increased dependency in activities of daily living ([ADLs]- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing, and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). Findings: During a review of Resident admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 72's diagnoses included dementia, Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a two-person assist when utilizing the electric stand-up lift (battery-powered device to provide assistance from a sitting to standing position) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 64). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 64 becoming unsteady on the electronic stand-up lift resulting in a fall and/or injury. Findings: During an observation on 5/5/2025 at 1:27 p.m., inside Resident 64's room, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 entered Resident 64's room with the electric stand-up lift. CNA 4 did not have another staff member in Resident 64's room to operate the electronic stand-up lift. CNA 4 transferred Resident 64 from the wheelchair to the bed using the electronic stand-up lift alone. During a review of Resident 64's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 64's diagnoses included multiple sclerosis (a disease that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one of two residents (Resident 80), who required hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed), a dialysis emergency kit (e-kit) at bedside. This failure had the potential for Resident 80 to receive delayed intervention in managing dialysis site complications such as bleeding. Findings: During a review of Resident 80's admission Record, dated 1/15/2025, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 80 on 1/15/2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease (CKD - a condition that causes gradual loss of kidney function over a period of time) with dependence on hemodialysis (a treatment to cleanse the blood of wastes and extra fluids artificially through a machine when the kidney(s) have failed), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), and hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 80's Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's physician (Physician 1) conducted an initial comprehensive assessment (a thorough evaluation of person's health, including their physical, mental, and social factors) for one of six sampled residents (Resident 45) after Resident 45 was readmitted to the facility. This deficient practice resulted in the delay of a comprehensive assessment of Resident 45's health and status, which could negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 45. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 45 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 45's diagnoses included cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication due to problems with thinking and processing information, rather than just speech or language issues), generalized muscle weakness (feeling weak throughout the body), and dementia (a progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on an order for consultation with an Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT - medical doctor who specializes in the medical and surgical treatment of conditions affecting the ears, nose, throat, head, and neck region) doctor for Resident 82. This failure had the potential to result in worsening left ear pain and left ear hearing loss for Resident 82. Findings: During a review of Resident 82's admission Record, dated 1/22/2025, the admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 82 on 1/22/2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease (ESRD - irreversible kidney failure), anemia (a condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), hypertension (HTN - high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and peripheral vascular disease (PVD - a slow progressive narrowing of the blood flow to the arms and legs). During an interview on 5/5/2025 at 10:55 a.m., with Resident 82, in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were respected and alternatives were provided for one of six sampled residents (Resident 42). This deficient practice had the potential to result in decreased meal intake, and alter Resident 42's nutritional status. Findings: During a review of Resident 42's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 42 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), ([DM]- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength). During a review of Resident 42's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] - a resident assessment tool), dated 4/15/2025, the MDS indicated Resident 42's cognitive (the ability to think and process information) skills for daily decision making was intact. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the renal diet (specialized diet designed to help people with kidney disease or kidney failure to manage their condition) menu for one of four sampled residents (Resident 21). This deficient practice had the potential to result in the buildup of waste products that Resident 21's kidneys could not filter. Findings: During a review of Resident 21's admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 21's diagnoses included spina bifida (a condition that occurs when the spine and spinal column do not form properly), end stage renal disease ([ESRD], irreversible kidney failure), and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (also known as neurogenic bladder, when damage to the brain, spinal cord, or nerves disrupts the communication between the brain and the bladder, leading to a loss of bladder control). During a review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set ([MDS], a resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-08 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label and properly store food brought by family/ visitors for three out of three residents (Residents 40, 66, and 52) in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Use and storage for foods brought in by family or visitors. These deficient practices had the potential to result in food borne illnesses (any illness resulting from eating contaminated/spoiled foods) for Residents 40, 66, and 52, with symptoms including upset stomach, stomach cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fever and could lead to other serious medical complications and hospitalization. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 40's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 40 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 40's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) and end stage renal disease (ESRD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician order for physical therapy ([PT]- healthcare specialty focuses on restoring, maintaining, and improving a resident ability to move and function) and occupational therapy ([OT]-a healthcare specialty that helps a resident improve the ability to perform daily activities) evaluation and a wheelchair was carried out for one of six sampled residents (Resident 72). This deficient practice resulted in delayed treatment and services for Resident 72 and placed the resident at higher risk for further functional and mobility decline. Cross Reference F688 Findings: During a review of Resident admission Record (Face Sheet), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), diabetes mellitus (DM- a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), and muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 3 sampled residents ' (Resident 1) personal wheelchair was accounted for, in the resident ' s inventory list (a document where a resident ' s personal belongings are listed/ added when received), as indicated in the facility ' s policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Inventory List, Resident ' s Personal. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 ' s wheelchair lost or stolen. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including hemiplegia (total paralysis of the arm, leg, and trunk on the same side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke, loss of blood flow to a part of the brain). During a review of Resident 1 ' s History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/26/2024, the H&P indicated Resident 1 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a concurrent observation and interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive, resident-centered care plan was developed for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), who was admitted high risk for fall. This failure resulted in a total of three falls (2/20/2024, 3/25/2024 and 7/16/2024) within 5 months and had the potential to cause harm and injury to Resident 1. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record, the admission Record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falls and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], the fall risk assessmentindicated Resident 1was admitted with history of falls. The fall risk assessment indicated Resident 1 had impaired gait (a person's manner of walking) and overestimates (misjudge) and was forgetful of limitations. The fall risk assessment indicated Resident 1 was a high fall risk. During a review of Resident 1 ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the call light was in reach for five of 92 facility residents (Resident 27, 70, 7, 9, and 79). This deficient practice increased the risk for residents to be unable to call for staff assistance or express their needs. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 27's admitting diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness and osteoarthritis (when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down). A review of Resident 27's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening/planning tool), dated 2/13/2024, indicated Resident 27 required partial to moderate assistance with personal hygiene and dressing, required substantial to maximal assistance with toileting, and was dependent on staff for showering and bathing. The MDS indicated Resident 27 required partial to moderate assistance with rolling left to right in the bed, and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatments and services to prevent and/or limit a decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint [where two bones meet]) and mobility (ability to move) for two of six sampled residents (Residents 78 and 29) with identified ROM and mobility concerns by failing to: a. Provide treatment and services to maintain and prevent a decline in mobility and ROM of Resident 78's legs. b. Provide a right knee extension splint (rigid material or apparatus used to support and immobilize a broken bone or impaired joint) to Resident 78's right leg in accordance with Physical Therapy (PT, profession aimed in the restoration, maintenance, and promotion of optimal physical function) recommendations on 2/14/2023. c. Implement the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP, nursing program that uses restorative nursing aides [RNAs] to help residents maintain their function and joint mobility) for ambulation (to walk), five times a week, as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-05-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 37) did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) when: 1. Lorazepam (brand name Ativan, used to act on the brain and nerves to produce a calming effect) was administered for behaviors not indicated in the physician order or resident's care plan. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observations were used for clinical justification in determining whether to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR, the stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued) for Resident 37's lorazepam order. 3. Resident 37's attending physician did not document the risk benefit analysis for continued administration of lorazepam beyond 14 days. These deficient practices placed Residents 37 at risk for avoidable harm from unwanted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure expired Ozempic (once-weekly injection to manage blood glucose levels) was removed and discarded for one out of three residents (Resident 51) medications reviewed in two of two inspected medication carts (Middle Station Medication Cart). 2. Ensure medication remaining at the facility after two of two residents (Resident 55 and 88) was discharged from the facility was removed from active supply, marked discontinued and securely stored until destroyed in accordance with the facility's Policy and Procedure (P&P) titled, Discontinued Medications, dated 8/2019. These deficient practices increased the risk that Residents 51 could have received medication that had become ineffective or toxic due to improper storage or labeling, which had the potential to lead to health complications related to Diabetes (a group of disease that result in too much sugar in the blood), hospitalization or death. For Resident 55 and Resident 88, these…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure all food items stored in the kitchen and dry food storage room were labeled and dated, and failed to ensure safe food preparation practices in the kitchen were followed. These deficient practices had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and cross contamination (transfer of harmful bacteria from one place to another) that could lead to foodborne illness for residents who received food from kitchen. Findings: During the initial tour of the facility's kitchen on 4/29/2024 at 8:30 a.m., the following was observed: 1. In the refrigerator, there were 10 glasses of milk,10 glasses of juice, one medium sized plastic container of cooked beans, and one medium sized container of apple sauce without a date, and three cartons of milk open without a date. 2. In the refrigerator, there was one large size box of margarine and three plastic bags of uncooked sausages without a date. 3. On top of the kitchen table, there was two medium sized containers with previously cooked rice without a date. 4. In the dry storage room,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs, an infection control intervention used to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms [MDROs, organisms resistant to at least one or more classes of antimicrobial agents]) were implemented for 16 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 59, 70, 94, 46, 25, 74, 92, 71, 48, 38, 40, 69, 26, 2, 62, 247). This deficient practice increased the risk for spread of MDROs to vulnerable facility residents, and the potential incidence of preventable infection. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 59's admission Record indicated Resident 59 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted Resident 59 on 7/13/2023. Resident 59's admitting diagnoses included cellulitis (a common and potentially serious bacterial skin infection) of the right lower leg and a pressure ulcer (PU, injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure) above the tailbone. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer advance directives for one of three residents (Resident 44). This deficient practice had the potential to cause conflict with Resident 44's wishes regarding health care. Findings: A review of Resident 44's admission Record indicated Resident 44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 44's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem with the metabolism causing brain dysfunction) and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). A review of Resident 44's History and Physical (H&P), undated, indicated Resident 44 did not have capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 44's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/12/2024, indicated Resident 44 was severely cognitively impaired (ability to think and reason). The MDS indicated Resident 44 required substantial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 92 resident's (Resident 37 and 41) beds were not positioned against the wall. This deficient practice reduced the residents' ability to get out of bed freely and also increased the risk for entrapment and subsequent injury. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 37's admission Record indicated Resident 37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 37's admitting diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness and a history of falling. A review of Resident 37's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment and care screening/planning tool), dated 4/2/2024, indicated Resident 37 had severe cognitive impairment (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions). The MDS indicated Resident 37 required maximal assistance from or full dependence on staff for repositioning herself in bed. During a concurrent interview and record review on 5/1/2024 at 12:02 p.m., with Registered Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized care plan with measurable objectives, timeframes, and interventions to improve, maintain, or prevent a further decline in range of motion (ROM, full movement potential of a joint) and mobility for one of six sampled residents (Resident 78) who was identified as having decreased mobility and ROM limitations in the right leg. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of necessary care and services for Resident 78, and had the potential to lead to contracture (loss of motion of a joint) development and a decline in overall physical functioning. Findings: A review of Resident 78's admission Record indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including an acquired absence of the right leg below the knee (amputation of the right leg below the level of the knee), right knee contracture, and chronic left ankle ulcer (sore that forms on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately monitor and record the total amount of calories received via enteral feeding (nutrition that bypasses the mouth and delivers via the stomach) for one of three residents (Resident 2). This deficient practice had the potential to result in Resident 2 not receiving an adequate amount of calories which could potentially lead to weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. Resident 2's diagnoses included dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), gastrostomy ([g-tube] the creation of an artificial external opening into the stomach for nutritional support), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 2's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/5/2023, indicated Resident 2 did not have capacity to understand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor one out of three residents' food preferences (Resident 65). This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 65 experience discomfort due to indigestion. Findings: A review of Resident 65's admission Record indicated Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 65's diagnoses included gastro-esophageal reflux disease ([GERD] a digestive disease in which the stomach acid or bile irritates the food pipe lining), constipation, and nausea with vomiting. A review of Resident 65's History and Physical (H&P), dated 1/10/2023, indicated Resident 65 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 65's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a standardized assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/6/2024, indicated Resident 65 was cognitively intact (ability to think and reason). A review of Resident 65's GERD care plan, dated 1/27/2023, indicated Resident 65's health goals was to remain free from discomfort…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-02 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Occupational Therapy (OT, provides services to increase and/or maintain a person's capability to participate in everyday life activities) services to one of six sampled residents (Resident 78) who had activities of daily living (ADL, basic activities such as eating, dressing, toileting) and functional mobility (ability to move around and perform daily tasks) concerns. This deficient practice prevented Resident 78 from receiving skilled therapy services to maintain or achieve the highest practicable level of function. Findings: A review of Resident 78's admission Record indicated Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including an acquired absence of the right leg below the knee (amputation of the right leg below the level of the knee), right knee contracture (shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue leading to deformity and rigidity of joints), and chronic left ankle ulcer (sore that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-02 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of three Residents (Resident 74) understood and received the arbitration agreement in a language (Spanish) Resident 74 could understand when entering a binding contract. This deficient practice had the potential to result in harm for Resident 74 by waiving his right to a jury trial when taking legal action without his knowledge. Findings: A review of Resident 74's admission Record indicated Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident 74's diagnoses included stage renal disease (is the final, permanent stage of kidney disease, where kidney function has declined to the point that the kidneys can no longer function on their own) and dependence on renal dialysis (is the process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys can no longer perform these functions naturally). A review of Resident 74's History and Physical (H&P), dated 12/5/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy to one of five sampled residents (Resident 2), when providing right foot wound care. This deficient practice violated the resident's right to privacy and had the potential to affect the psychosocial well-being of the resident. Findings: A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included encounter for change or removal of surgical wound dressing, diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels), and encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation (aftercare following surgical amputation) A review of Resident 2's history and physical (H&P) dated 3/16/2004, indicated Resident 2 had the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. A review of Resident 2's minimum data set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care screening tool), dated 3/20/2024, indicated Resident 2's cognitive skills (thought process) was independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan to reflect safety measures in caring for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1), who was at risk for spontaneous fractures (broken bone) due to brittle bones. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for further injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis that included dementia (impairment of memory and abstract thinking), age-related osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle), and unilateral primary osteoarthritis (type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down) of right knee. A review of Resident 1's history and physical (H&P) dated 4/18/2023, indicated Resident 1 does not have the mental capacity to understand and make medical decisions. A review of Resident 1's minimum data set ([MDS] a standardized care assessment and care screening tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate assessment was conducted on the lower extremities for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential that proper interventions necessary for an individualized care plan will not be identified and had the potential to provide poor quality care to the affected resident. Findings During a review of Resident 1's admission record, dated 3/28/2024, the admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fracture (broken bone) of lower end of left femur (thigh), fracture of lower end of right femur, and osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated 8/26/2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment and care screening tool, dated 9/5/2023, the MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate documentation was available in the medical record for 1 of 4 sampled residents, Resident 1. Resident 1 who had an insurance managed by a Health Management Organization (HMO, a health insurance plan that usually limits coverage to care from doctors who work for or contract with the HMO), and was changed to Medicare (united states federal health insurance program for people aged 65 years or older and people with certain disabilities). This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s family member verbalizing feelings of mistrust, accusations of false documentation and doubting the care the facility staff provided. Findings: During an interview on 2/7/24 at 8:30 a.m., with Family Member 1 (FM 1), FM 1 stated facility staff changed Resident 1 ' s health insurance coverage from an HMO to Medicare to extend Resident 1 ' s stay at the facility without his consent. During an interview on 2/20/24 at 12:55 p.m., with the business office manager, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 2 monitored and supervised one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after being medicated and agitated 10 minutes prior to the incident. As a result of this failure, Resident 1 suffered a fall to the ground from a wheelchair and sustained a subdural hematoma (a type of brain bleed), subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space that surrounds the brain), compression fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra (a type of break in bones to the back that stack up on from the spine), right eleventh rib fracture (break in bone of the rib), and right temporal bone fracture (break in bone that forms part of the side and base of the skull). Findings: During a review of Residents 1's Face Sheet (admission record), the face sheet indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's diagnoses included generalized muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach and accessible for one of three sampled residents (Resident 3). This deficient practice had the potential to result in a fall, accidents and delay in meeting the needs for Resident 3. Findings: During a review of Residents 3 ' s Face Sheet (admission record), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including muscle weakness, hypertension (high blood pressure) and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar). During a review of Resident 3 ' s History and Physical (H/P), dated 12/13/2022, the H/P indicated Resident 3 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 3 ' s care plan titled, High Risk for Falls and Injuries, dated 12/13/2022, the staff's interventions included to place the resident ' s call light within reach and to encourage the use of the call light. During a review of Resident 3's Minimum Data Set ([MDS] a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation to meet the resident's needs by not ensuring: A. the resident's call lights were within reach for Five of Five sampled residents (Residents 56, 67, 2, 41 and 35) B. ensure bed's are working properly for one of three sampled residents (Resident 20). These deficient practicse had the potential to negatively impact the psychosocial well-being of the residents or result in delayed provision of services. Findings: A1.During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to hypertension (a common condition in which the long-term force of the blood against artery walls is high enough that it may eventually cause health problems, such as heart disease), diabetes mellitus (refers to a group of diseases that affect how your body uses blood sugar), kidney transplant status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two sampled Residents (#56 and # 269), received the professional standard of care and services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 56 and Resident 269 not receiving fingernail care and had the potential to negatively impact Resident 56's and Resident 269's quality of life and self-esteem. Findings: a.During a review of Resident 56's admission Record indicated Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to hypertension (a common condition in which the long-term force of the blood against your artery walls is high enough that it may eventually cause health problems, such as heart disease), diabetes mellitus (refers to a group of diseases that affect how your body uses blood sugar), kidney transplant status (surgical procedure to place a healthy kidney from a living or deceased donor into a person whose…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Label four insulin pens with a pharmacy label for Resident 23, in accordance with medication labeling requirements, in one of 2 inspected medication room (Medication Room Miles Station). 2. Indicate open date on a multi-dose Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative (Mantoux) Tubersol Vaccine, Gabapentin Solution, Albuterol Sulfate in one of two inspected medication room (Medication Room Miles Station). 3. Indicate an open date on Morphine Sulfate concentrate, Geri-tussin DM, 5 dietary supplements, multi-dose Heparin vial and Breo Ellipta, in accordance with medication labeling requirements and manufacturers' requirements and facility policies, in one of two inspected medication carts (Medication Cart Miles in Yellow zone). 4. Remove and discard from use one expired multi-dose Influenza Vaccine, one insulin vial with no identifier, one suppository with no identifier, one Intravenous antibiotic, Nystatin oral suspension, in accordance with manufacturers' requirements and facility policies in one of two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store and prepare food under sanitary conditions in one (1) of 1 kitchen, by failing to: A. Ensure the facility used pasteurized ( have gone through a process that kills germs in foods and drinks ) eggs when preparing fried over-easy eggs( (egg gets fried on both sides, but it's not cooked for very long on the second side, so the yolk remains runny and uncooked) egg for 6 of 6 residents sampled, B. Ensure the jelly sandwiches were not stored in the dry storage area. These deficient practices had the potential to result in contamination of food items placing residents at a high risk for food borne illness that can lead to a decline in health, hospitalization and death. Findings: A.During an observation and interview with the dietary supervisor (DS) on 1/19/2022 at 9:27 a.m., DS confirmed that the eggs did not have P stamped on them to indicate the eggs were pasturized. Per DS, fried over easy-eggs were not on the regular menu, however fried-over easy eggs were regularly served due to residents requests. Per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent and control the spread of infections for two of two sampled residents (29, 1 and 17) by failing to: a.Ensure treatment nurse 1 (TN 1) performed hand hygiene and used clean gloves while rendering wound care treatment for Resident 29 and Resident 1. b. Staff covered Resident 17's toothbrush before storing it on top of the bathroom sink for Resident 17 These deficient practices placed Residents17 and 29 at risk for contracting an infectious disease that could lead to illness and hospitalization. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 29's admission record (face sheet) , the face sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 29 on 8/20/2021. Resident 29's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), type 2 diabetes (body unable to regulate blood sugar [glucose]) , peripheral vascular disease (a condition that causes poor blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide 1 out of 7 residents (Resident 23), and or their responsible parties, with written information on how to formulate an Advanced Directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor). This deficient practice had the potential for violating Resident 23 choices about their medical care. Findings: During a review of Resident's medical records, the following information was missing: Resident 23 (admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE]) did not have an advanced directive or a signature declining information on how to obtain an advanced directive. During a concurrent interview with Social Services Director (SSD) and record review of Resident 23's medical record on 01/20/2022 at 03:34 p.m., there was no advance directive form in Resident 23's chart. SSD stated that the advance directives…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident's belongings, update inventory list, and verify missing items for one of two sampled residents (Resident 6), resulted in Resident 6 feeling uncomfortable wearing clothes that do not belong to him. This deficient practice resulted in violating Resident 6's rights and has the potential to cause negative effect on resident's quality of life. Findings: A review of admission record, Resident 6 was originally admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses that included obesity (excessive amount of body fat), arthritis (swelling and tenderness of one or more joints), joint replacement surgery of the left knee. A review of Resident 6's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool) dated 08/19/2021 indicated Resident 6 has intact cognition, with clear speech. Resident 6 required one person assist in transferring, dressing, and grooming. During an observation rounds on 01/20/22 at 08:50 a.m., Resident 6 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement an individualized resident-centered plan of care with measurable objectives, timeframe, and interventions to meet Resident 56 who has pacemaker (a small device that is implanted in the chest to help control heartbeat) needs. Findings: During a review of Resident 56's admission Record, the record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to hypertension (a common condition in which the long-term force of the blood against your artery walls is high enough that it may eventually cause health problems, such as heart disease), diabetes mellitus (refers to a group of diseases that affect how your body uses blood sugar), kidney transplant status (surgical procedure to place a healthy kidney from a living or deceased donor into a person whose kidneys no longer function properly), peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition in which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 8 received the necessary care and services needed to attain the highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, by not ensuring facility staff tended to Resident 8's needs. This deficient practice had the potential to result in Residents 8 not receiving the care that was needed to maintain Resident 8's physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 8's Face Sheet (admission record) indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 8's diagnoses included essential hypertension (high blood pressure), history of falling, dizziness and giddiness (the feeling if being unbalanced and lightheaded), ataxia following cerebral infarction (without coordination and can occur after stroke and may affect various body parts including the eyes, hands, arms, legs, body or trunk, and speech, following injury to the brain), hyperlipidemia (high level of fat particles in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice to meet the resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs, for three of three sampled residents, as evidenced by: a. Failing to properly implement safety precaution for Resident 10 who needed proper positioning and suctioning. This deficient practice has the potential to result in aspiration (inhalation of foreign materials) and resident choking on her saliva. b. Failing to provide proper turning for a Resident 1who needed assistance with repositioning and care. This deficient practice resulted in worsening of the left hip wound. Findings: A review of the admission record (Face sheet) indicated Resident 10 originally admitted on [DATE] and was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to dependence to supplemental oxygen, muscle weakness, Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one sampled residents (Resident 268) was assessed upon arrival to the facility when she returned from outpatient dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood). This deficient practice resulted in a delay in addressing Resident 268's complaint of dizziness, and this could have been detrimental to her health and well-being. Findings: During a review of Resident 268's admission record (face sheet) , the face sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident 268 on 1/10/2022. Resident 268's diagnoses included; multiple fracture (broken) ribs , type 2 diabetes (body unable to process blood sugar [glucose]), end stage renal disease (kidney [organ that filters waste from the blood] ceases to function thus needing dialysis to live), cardiomegaly (enlarged heart), sepsis (blood infection), encephalopathy (disease or damaged brain and person has a declined ability to think, reason, concentrate). During a review of Resident 268's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to follow policy for count of controlled substances on change-of-shift documentation in the medication cart in the red zone. This deficient practice has the potential for the facility staff to not secure and safeguard-controlled medications as well as not be able to monitor those medications were administered to the residents safely and accurately. Findings: During a concurrent inspection of the controlled substances in the medication cart, and interview with assistant director of nursing (ADON) on January 20, 2022, at 11:32 a.m.; ADON, acknowledged that the Controlled count verification form, indicated the box designated for the on-coming nurse on January 20, 2022, was blank. ADON stated that both on-coming and outgoing licensed nurses need to complete and sign the form indicating that a narcotic count was performed and reconciled at the start and end of the shifts. ADON stated this was important in order to track all medications for accountability. During an interview on January 21, 2022, at 4:09 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act on the consultant pharmacist's recommendation in the Medication Regimen Review (MRR- a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication) in a timely manner for three out of nine sampled residents (Residents 13, 45, and 53). This deficient practice resulted in recommended blood test not performed on time for Residents 13, 45, and 53, with potential for adverse drug reaction for the following: a. Resident 13- Digoxin (medication to treat heart failure) level for the months of November and December b. Resident 45- Liver Function Test (blood test to diagnose and monitor liver disease) for the month of December c. Resident 53- TSAT (Transferrin Saturation- measures how much of stored iron can be used to make new red blood) and Ferritin (measures how much iron is stored in your body) for the months of November and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COVENANT CARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVENANT CARE CALIFORNIA, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT CARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE CAPITAL INVESTORS V, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (B), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (Q), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (S), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND, L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT SUBCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| STATE TREASURER OF MICH CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPL RTMNT SYSTEMS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| STOCKWELL FUND II LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| EVANS, MARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| LEVIN, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| SIMS, CHRISTINE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| TOROK, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 02/20/2014 |
| ASHLEY, DAVA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/26/2018 |
| CARNEY, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2013 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/17/2018 |
| SPARKS, CAROL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/17/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056144. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.