Los Altos Post-Acute
809 Fremont Avenue, Los Altos, CA 94024 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 152 certified beds · (650) 941-5255 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 25.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.3% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 3.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.1% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.3% | 23.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.88 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.70 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 235 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 73 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.2%CMS range 46.2–59.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.2–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 28.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 93.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.7%CMS range 5.1–11.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 146.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.74 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-03-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of accidents and hazards for two of 24 sampled residents (40 and 94) when: 1. Resident 40 was not properly assessed for Smoking Safety Screen. This failure resulted in Resident 40 sustaining burns to face, neck, and chest after smoking unsupervised while on oxygen on 7/31/21; 2. Resident 94 was not provided adequate supervision while smoking as indicated in his smoking care plan. This failure had the potential to result in serious injury to the residents in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 40's clinical record indicated Resident 40 was admitted on [DATE]. He was on hospice and had diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), chronic respiratory failure (condition in which not enough oxygen passes from your lungs and into your blood), depressive disorder (mood disorder which interferes with daily life),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the activities of daily living (ADL's such as bed mobility, toileting, and transferring) self-care deficit care plan for one of eight sampled residents (Resident 104) when the intervention for two persons assist during bed mobility was not provided. This failure resulted in Resident 104 sustaining a fall from bed on 5/3/19, with contusion (any collection of blood outside of a blood vessel) of right upper extremity, contusion of left knee, and avulsion (losing a toenail) of left index toenail. Findings: Review of Resident 104's undated face sheet indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including history of falling, contracture (hardening of muscles) of left hand, diabetes (increase blood sugar), hypertension (increase blood pressure), and hemiplegia (paralysis of the body) on the left and right side of the body. Review of Resident 104's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 2/13/19, indicated he had a brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure needed care and services were provided in accordance with the resident's goals of care and professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident 1), when Resident 1's blood pressure (BP, the force of the blood pushing against the walls of the arteries as the heart pumps it through the body) was not checked prior to administering BP medication on 4/5/26, 4/6/26, 4/8/26, 4/11/26 and 4/12/26 and Resident 1's BP was not rechecked on 4/4/26 and 4/7/26 after an episode of low BP reading (A low blood pressure [hypotension] range is defined as any reading below 90/60 mmHg [a unit of measurement]). These failures put Resident 1 at risk for clinical decline and delayed clinical response and support.A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated an admission date of 4/1/26 and discharge date of 4/13/26. Resident 1's diagnoses included but were not limited to unspecified atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm); depression, unspecified (a serious mood disorder that causes persistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards for one of one resident (Resident 1) when:1.Licensed nurses did not administer Resident 1's Vancomycin (a powerful prescription antibiotic used to treat serious bacterial infections) as ordered within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time and three doses were missed in May 2026;2.Resident 1 received only two doses of Mounjaro (brand named of tirzepatide, a prescription medication taken as a weekly injection to help control blood sugar with type 2 diabetes mellitus [DM - a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing) since it was ordered on 5/4/2026;3.Licensed nurses did not follow physician's order to check Resident 1's finger-stick blood sugar (FSBS - a quick method of checking a person's sugar level using a small device called a glucometer) for five days; and4.Certified nursing assistant A (CNA A) did not provide Resident 1's lunch tray on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolatedHonor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care to maintain a psychosocial well-being for one of one resident (Resident 1) when Resident 1 with diagnosis of post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying, life-threatening, or deeply stressful event) had to share a bathroom with male residents. This failure resulted in Resident 1's verbalization of feeling unsafe and had the potential to result in psychosocial distress (the emotional, mental, and social difficulties an individual experiences when overwhelming stress or painful events exceed their ability to cope).Findings:Review of Resident 1's clinical record titled, admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anxiety disorder (a mental illness that causes constant fear) and PTSD.Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the discharge plan for one out of three residents (Resident 1) when the facility staff (Social Services and/or Case Manager) did not send a referral for home health services (HH, healthcare provided in the client's home) to a Home Health Agency (HHA). The failure had the potential to compromise the health and safety of Resident 1.A review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified and muscle weakness. During a review of Resident 1's document titled, discharged summary/Post Discharge Plan of Care, effective date 11/10/25, indicated in IV. Rehab/Discharge Potential. B. rehab, B2. Comments: Pt (Patient) is independent in bed mobility and transfers. Pt (Patient) is supervision for ambulation with FWW (Front-wheeled walkers, are mobility aids with two front wheels and rear glides, designed to be pushed forward without lifting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent accidents was provided for one resident (Resident 1) out of one sampled Resident. This failure resulted in Resident 1's elopement, minor injuries, and subsequent hospital visit.FINDINGS: A review of Resident 1's medical record indicated an admission date of 9/16/25. Resident 1's diagnoses included but were not limited to unsteadiness on feet, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and cognitive communication deficit.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS, a tool used to assess cognition [knowing, learning, and understanding things]) score was 8 (a score of 0 to 7 indicates severe cognitive impairment, 8-12 moderate impairment, 13-15 patient is cognitively intact).A review of Resident 1's Progress Notes dated 11/4/25 at 10:39 am by Registered Nurse (RN) A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure needed care and services were provided when call lights were not answered promptly and urgently. This failure had the potential to put residents at risk for physical, emotional and psychosocial distress. The census during the abbreviated survey was 134. Findings: During an observation on 6/12/25 at 3:26 p.m., call light was on for room [ROOM NUMBER]. Two licensed nurses were doing report by the medication cart along the hallway outside the room next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an interview on 6/12/25 at 3:32 p.m. with Registered Nurse (RN) A, RN A verified room [ROOM NUMBER]'s call light was on while she was getting report (change of shift endorsement) from another nurse. RN A stated nurses can answer call lights even during report. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/12/25 at 3:39 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON verified call lights were on for several rooms and staff were in the hallway and nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the half side rails were installed after obtaining the informed consent for one of three sampled residents (1) to help him reposition and stabilize in bed. This failure resulted in Resident 1's falling out of bed within six and half hours after being newly admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was transferred back to an acute hospital for further evaluation and management, and jeopardized Resident 1's health and safety during the short stay in the facility and caused Resident 1 to have a transfer to the acute hospital where he was diagnosed with intraparenchymal hemorrhage of brain (bleeding within the brain's functional tissue). FINDINGS: The clinical records of Resident 1 were reviewed. Resident 1's Face Sheet (document that summarizes a person's medical information) indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-specified sequelae (late effects) of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, facility policy review, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure a discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) accurately reflected the location to which a resident was discharged for 1 (Resident #141) of 27 sampled residents for whom MDS assessments were reviewed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS STANDARD OF PRACTICE, dated 01/2024 indicated, It is the practice of this facility to conduct accurate coding and delivery of services provided to capture accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity and health status as per CMS RAI MDS 3.0 Manual guidelines. The CMS Long-Term Care Facility RAI 3.0 User's Manual, version 1.19.11, dated October 2024, revealed section A2105: Discharge Status specified, Item Rationale - This item documents the location to which the resident is being discharged at the time of discharge. Knowing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) accurately reflected the presence of diagnosed mental illness for 1 (Resident #63) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment- Coordination with PASARR Program, reviewed/revised on 09/18/2024, revealed, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #63 on 06/12/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia (onset date of 06/12/2021) and major depressive disorder (onset date of 06/12/2021). Resident #63's Care Plan Report included a focus area, initiated 06/13/2021, that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control measures when: 1.Certified nursing assistant B (CNA B) and restorative nurse assistant C (RNA C) did not wear N95 (a mask or a respirator worn over the mouth and nose to protect the respiratory system by filtering out dangerous substances [such as dusts, fumes, or bacteria] from inhaled air) properly; and 2.Certified nursing assistant C (CNA D) did not follow the contact (set of steps to prevent the spread of infection from a patient to others) with bodily fluids precautions posted before the entrance in Resident 2's room, did not follow the proper sequence of putting on personal protective equipment (PPE - clothing and equipment that is worn or used to provide protection against hazardous substances and/or environments), did not remove and discard the dirty gown and gloves prior to leaving Resident 3's room and did not perform hand hygiene before leaving the room. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission and spread of infection throughout the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC, a form given by the facility to all Medicare beneficiaries before the end of a Medicare covered Part A stay or when all of Part B therapies are ending) was not given in a timely manner to one of two sample residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in Resident 1 not being able to make an appeal. Findings: During an interview over the phone on 9/19/24 at 8:53 a.m. with Resident 1's relative (RR), it was stated that RR saw a voicemail from the facility on 9/11/24. RR also stated she wanted to make an appeal and called the facility on 9/11/24 regarding the NOMNC. RR stated that facility informed RR that they will call back with the information. RR stated that facility did not call back. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated, Resident one was admitted on [DATE]. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool) dated 8/14/24 indicated a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident representative was notified prior to discharge for one (Resident 1) of two sampled residents. This failure had the potential to result in psychosocial distress for Resident 1 when Resident 1's relative (RR) was not able to communicate with Resident 1 before, during and right after Resident 1's discharge to another facility. Findings: During an interview over the phone on 9/19/24 at 8:53 a.m. with Resident 1's relative (RR), RR stated that facility did not communicate the discharge of Resident 1. RR stated she saw a voicemail on 9/10/24 from the facility regarding discharge and called the facility on 9/10/24 to make an appeal. RR stated she was told she will receive a call back with the information. RR stated that facility did not call back. RR also stated discharge date was not provided by the facility and there was no written notice of discharge given. RR also stated, she went to the facility on 9/13/24 and was informed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents (Resident 1 and 2) received proper care and treatment services when: 1. For Resident 1, there was no physician order and care plan regarding the use of left-hand splint; and 2. For Resident 2's treatment for the nephrostomy sites (an opening in the skin of the back where the tube is inserted to drain urine from the kidney), was not initiated until 4 days after admission and it was not documented in some days. These failures could affect the residents' health and individualized care and services provided while in the facility. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (blood poisoning due to an infection), urinary tract infection (UTI, an infection caused by a bacterium (germs) that gets into the bladder or kidneys) and Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four allegations of abuse was reported within 24 hours per Federal and State law when one resident (Resident 1) left the facility AMA (against medical advice) for his safety after he telephoned the police to report an allegation of being touched inappropriately. This failure had the potential to compromise resident's safety and result in further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (document that contains a summary of personal and demographic information), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of fusion of the spine (major surgery designed to stop motion to alleviate pain) in the lumbar region (series of small bones enclosing the spinal cord in the low back). Face Sheet further indicated Resident 1 was self-responsible. During a review of Resident 1's Release from Responsibility for Discharge, dated 10/14/23, the Release from Responsibility for Discharge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate one of four allegations of abuse when Resident 1 reported being touched inappropriately. This failure had the potential to compromise resident's safety and result in further abuse. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (document that contains a summary of personal and demographic information), the Face Sheet indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of fusion of the spine (major surgery designed to stop motion to alleviate pain) in the lumbar region (series of small bones enclosing the spinal cord in the low back). Face Sheet further indicated Resident 1 was self-responsible. During a review of Resident 1's Release from Responsibility for Discharge, dated 10/14/23, the Release from Responsibility for Discharge indicated, Resident 1 was leaving against the advice of the attending physician. During a review of Resident 1's Notice of Transfer or Discharge, dated 10/17/23, the Notice of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards for two of three residents (Resident 1 and 2) when: 1. Resident 1 ' s eye drop medication was not discontinued after the resident ' s refusals and statement it caused eye irritation; 2. Medications were not provided timely for Residents 1 and 2. These failures had the potential to result in health complications. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 1 ' s clinical record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm which can lead to blood clots and stroke) and glaucoma (damage to the nerve in the eye cause by fluid buildup or increased pressure). Review of Resident 1 ' s physician orders indicated he had a physician order for dorzolamide ophthalmic solution 2% (eye drops used to treat glaucoma) one drop in left eye two times a day, dated 10/29/23. Review of Resident 1 ' s MD progress notes, dated 10/30/23 indicated Resident 1 has glaucoma and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when a licensed vocational nurses A (LVN A) did not follow the five rights of medications administration (safety check prior to medication administration: right patient, right drug, dosage, right route, right time) and administered the wrong medications to Resident 1. This resulted in Resident 1 getting administered incorrect medications. Findings: Review of Resident 1's electronic medication administration record (EMAR, electronic version of medications received by a resident), dated 9/19/23, indicated physician ordered medications for her. Review of an SBAR- Medication regimen report, dated 9/19/23, indicated Resident 1 received the following medications which were not ordered for her by a physician: Adderall xr, cellcept, escitalopram, Pepcid, Oxybutynin Chloride, Oyster shell Calcium/Vitamin D, presdniSONE Oral tablet, senna, D3. During a telephone interview with LVN A on 11/2/23 at 4:12p.m., LVN A stated she did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-07 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their smoking policy and procedure (P/P) for one of three sampled residents (Residents 1) when Resident 1 had cigarettes and a lighter in her possession, even though she was assessed to not be an independent smoker (her Smoking Safety Screen and smoking care plan indicated she was to be supervised and assisted during smoking); therefore, staff needed to control and manage Resident 1's smoking items. This failure allowed Resident 1 to manage her own smoking items, contrary to the safety measures indicated in the facility's smoking policy and procedure. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was readmitted on [DATE] and had the diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment (minor problems with mental abilities such as memory or thinking), dementia (loss of mental functioning to the extent that it interferes with daily life and activities), ataxia (impaired balance or coordination), and major depressive disorder (low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an inventory of personal effects form was completed upon discharge for one resident (Resident 4). This failure resulted to inaccurate record of personal effects . Findings : Review of Resident 4 ' s progress notes dated 4/16/23, indicated, hospice nurse declared time of death at 1235 pm today. During a telephone interview with the family member (FM) on 5/8/23 at 9:05 a.m., the FM stated Resident 4 ' s ring was missing . During record review and concurrent interview with the social service worker (SSW) on 5/24/23 at12:05 p.m., Resident 4 ' s inventory of personal effects form, dated 11/23/22, was reviewed and the ring was not listed on the form. The area to check items given upon discharge and certification of receipt upon discharge was left blank. The SSW stated he told the FM Resident 4 did not have a ring listed on his inventory of personal effects. The SSW stated he gave all belongings to the FM but did not bring the form for the family member to sign. The SSW stated he should have checked the form and accounted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation , interview and record review , the facility failed to ensure call lights were properly working and accessible for three of four residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) when: 1.Resident 1 ' s bed call light did not work . This failure resulted to delay in providing care to Resident 1. 2. Residents' 2 and 3 call lights were not within reach while in bed. These failures could potentially put resident ' s comfort and safety at risk. Findings : 1.Review of Resident 1 ' s admission record indicated she was admitted with a diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure and her minimum, data set (MDS, an assessment tool ) dated 3/29/23, indicated she had a a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) of 9, which meant she had mild cognitive impairment. Resident 1 required staff assistance during toilet use and was incontinent of bowels. During an observation and concurrent interview on 5/24/23 at 11:15 a.m., Resident 1 was heard calling for help. Resident 1 held the call light and stated, I ' ve been pressing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received a medication as ordered. The facility also failed to notify the physician when Resident 1 did not receive this medication. These failures had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (inability to move legs and lower body) and diabetes mellitus (DM, a condition which affects the way the body processes blood sugar). Review of Resident 1's physician orders indicated she had an order, dated 8/15/23 for Rybelsus (medication used to control high blood sugar) oral Tablet 7 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement) Give 7 mg by mouth one time a day for DM. Review of Resident 1's August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR, record of medications given) indicated Rybelsus was not signed as administered to Resident 1 on 8/16/23, 8/17/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-03-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable. This failure placed the 114 residents eating at the facility at risk of poor food intake further compromising their nutritional status. Findings: During resident interviews on 3/7/22 starting at 8:30 a.m., multiple residents complained about the food generally being bad. Comments included the ham is salty, the zucchini is soggy and sloppy, the food is just not good. During an interview with Resident 3 on 3/8/22 at 7:42 a.m., Resident 3 stated the food is dreadful for example meals made with ground beef are greasy, the soups are watery, and the toast is dry and brittle. During an interview with Resident 78 on 3/8/22 at 8:58 a.m., Resident 78 said he orders take out about 80% of the time because most food at the facility is not good. During an interview with Resident 4 on 3/9/22 at 10:15 a.m., Resident 4 said he understands the food is made for many people, but they could make it somewhat tasty and not so bland, and all we (the Residents) have to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-03-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with professional standards for food safety when: 1. Resident food refrigerators and microwaves were not properly monitored, and not maintained in a sanitary condition, and multiple expired, moldy, and/or unlabeled foods were stored in the refrigerators; 2. Time/Temperature Control for Safety (TCS) foods (food that requires time/temperature control for safety to limit the growth of pathogens (i.e., bacterial or viral organisms capable of causing a disease or toxin formation), were not properly monitored for cool down; 3. TCS foods were not properly labeled, and expired items were in the refrigerator; and 4. Multiple food service pans and equipment were stored wet. These failures had the potential to cause the growth of microorganisms which could cause foodborne illness or cross contaminate food (cross contamination occurs when unclean surfaces or utensils spread germs to food and can potentially cause foodborne illness) for the 114 residents eating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 8 of 24 residents (84, 98, 112, 7, 116, 384, 53, and 67) received necessary and proper care and services when: 1. Licensed nurses did not follow ordered pain level for pain medications for Resident 84 and Resident 98; 2. Licensed nurses did not initiate change of condition and treatment for Resident 112's abrasions; 3. Residents 7 and 98 did not get any assistance or supervision after delivery of nourishments by the housekeeping supervisor (HKS); 4. Licensed nurses did not follow Resident 116's physician's order for bolus feeding (a larger amount of liquid nutrition is given in a short period of time, usually less than 30 minutes); 5. Licensed nurses did not closely monitor Resident 384 during intravenous (IV, given through veins) fluid hydration; 6. Licensed nurses did not document Resident 53's skin tear; and 7. Resident 67's care plan for an anticoagulant was not developed. These failures had the potential to affect the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication administration, ensure medications were available to administer, medications were given according to the manufacturer's specifications, and ensure controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) were fully accounted for when: 1. Licensed vocational nurse W (LVN W) left Resident 85's medications on his overbed table. This failure had the potential for misuse of residents' medications that could affect residents' health and well-being; 2. Two of six nurses failed to identify residents (Residents 22, 368, and 384) during medication pass. This failure had the potential for medication errors. 3. Two out of six nurses failed to inform the residents (Residents 22 and 109) the medications being administered during the medication pass. This failure had the potential for resident not to be aware of treatment and potential side effects; 4. Random controlled medication use audit for four of six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 12 residents (10, 72, 20, 63, and 76) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behaviors) when: 1. Resident 10 had received duloxetine (brand name: Cymbalta, antidepressant and nerve pain medication) 60 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) every day since 8/1/21, and Resident 87 had received duloxetine 60 mg every day since 2/7/2020, without gradual dose reduction (GDR, a tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks can be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication can be discontinued); and there was no documented clinical rationale by the physician for why an attempted GDR was not indicated; 2. Resident 72 had received clonazepam (an anti-anxiety medication) 0.5 mg three times a day since 6/24/21 without GDR; 3. Resident 20 received Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication, to treat severe mental disorder in which thought, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage and labeling of medications when: 1. Four medications identified in the medication refrigerator did not have the pharmacy label; 2. Temperature monitoring was not consistently documented twice daily on the temperature log sheets for three of four medication refrigerators; and 3. An oral inhaler in active stock was being used beyond the discard (expiration) date. The deficient practices had a potential for medication errors due to medications not being labeled; inadequately monitored medications, which could lead to unsafe and ineffective medications for the residents; and residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date. Findings: 1. During a medication room inspection observation on 3/7/22 at 10:43 a.m. in Station 3 with Registered Nurse (RN) CC, a medication refrigerator was observed inside the medication room. The refrigerator contained numerous refrigerated medications. Inspection of a medication refrigerator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-03-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the planned menu was followed for: 1. Eight of eight residents (Residents 51, 100, 47, 75, 468, 98, 77, 223) on renal diets (diets designed for people with kidney disease) when they were served pasta instead of peas; 2. Six of six residents (Residents 9, 27, 45, 469, 103, 378) on puree diets (texture modified diets for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) when they were served the wrong portion size for bread and zucchini; 3. Five of five residents (Residents 59, 92, 383, 68, 66) on minced and moist diets (texture modified diets for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) when they were served the wrong portion size for ham, zucchini, and bread; and 4. Eleven of eleven residents (Residents 26, 54, 67, 88, 368, 76, 105, 33, 32, 56, 15) on soft and bite sized diets (texture modified diets for people with chewing or swallowing difficulties) and eight out of ten residents (Residents 21, 50, 31, 91, 113, 369, 93, 52) on easy to chew diets (texture modified diets for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-03-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement infection control practices when: 1. Certified nursing assistant V (CNA V) did not put on gown and gloves when he brought the lunch tray to Resident 61 who was isolated and on contact precautions (intended to prevent transmission of infectious agents which are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or the resident's environment); 2. Glucometer (blood sugar testing monitor) was not cleaned and disinfected after resident use; 3. Medication nurse did not wipe down the vial stopper before drawing up medication into the syringe; 4. The treatment nurse (TN) did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks during Resident 3's wound care; 5. Registered nurse N (RN N) did not properly store Resident 116's used nasal cannula tubing (a tubing used to deliver oxygen from the machine through the nostrils) when not in use; 6. For Resident 74, facility staff did not keep the urinary drainage bag connected to nephrostomy (an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable and safe temperature level for one of three sampled resident rooms when Resident 218's room temperature was not maintained in the range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure had the potential for the resident to have an uncomfortable environment. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/7/22, at 8:32 a.m. inside Resident 218's room, the room temperature felt cold. Resident 218 stated It is cold in here. During a follow up interview on 3/8/22 at 8:22 a.m. with Resident 218, stated, It was still cold, and I had to ask for an extra blanket last night. During a review of Resident 218's clinical record, dated 3/6/22, the admission diagnosis indicated, Resident 218 had hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hypertension (condition in which the force of the blood against the artery walls is too high), stroke (damage to the brain from interruption of blood supply) dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). Her Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 74). Failure to accurately assess the resident had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to provide resident-centered care planning and interventions. Findings: Review of Resident 74's clinical record indicated, Resident 74 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of sepsis (a life-threatening infection), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy (a blockage in the urinary track), and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lacks bladder control due to brain or nerve problems). During an observation on 3/07/22 at 8:48 a.m., Resident 74 was lying in bed in her room and the head of the bed was elevated. Resident 74 had Jevity (a tube feeding formula) 1.0 cal (calories) via tube feeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were developed and implemented for three of 24 sampled residents (Residents 6, 116, and 74) when: 1. Resident 6's care plan for non-compliance with use of Aspen collar (a device used to support the resident's neck) was not initiated; 2. Resident 116's care plans for dialysis (a procedure when a resident is attached to an artificial kidney that helps clean blood), tube feeding (a flexible tube inserted through nose or belly to provide nutrients), antidepressant (type of medication used to treat depression) and insulin (a hormone used to lower the blood sugar) use were not initiated; and 3. Resident 74's care plan for Nephrostomy (an artificial opening created between the kidney and the skin which allows for the urinary diversion) tube/drainage bag care was not implemented. These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and well-being. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 6's clinical record indicated, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to prevent pressure ulcer for two of seven sampled residents (Resident 114 and Resident 220) when: 1. Resident 114's heels were not floated while in bed; and 2. Resident 220's heels were not offloaded and not covered with dressing while in bed. These failures had the potential to cause or worsen pressure ulcers. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/7/22 at 9:51 a.m., Resident 114's heels were not floated while in bed. During a follow up observation on 3/8/22 at 9:12 a.m., Resident 114's heels were not floated while in bed. Heel protectors were on top of cabinet not in use. During an interview on 3/8/22 at 12:44 p.m. with certified nursing assistant S (CNA S), she confirmed she was not aware that Resident 114's heels were to be floated while in bed. During a concurrent interview and review of care plan on 3/8/22 at 12:54 p.m. with licensed vocational nurse T (LVN T), she stated she was not aware of pressure ulcer prevention care plan for Resident 114's heels to be floated while in bed. LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 24 sampled residents (Residents 88 and 117) received necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice when: 1. Resident 88's oxygen tank was left empty while in use; and 2 .Facility staff did not post an Oxygen in use/No smoking sign on Resident 117's door. These failures had the potential to affect the resident's health and safety. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 88's clinical record indicated resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease (a plague buildup [fat deposits] in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart), unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance (a condition characterized by memory loss) and diabetes mellitus with diabetic polyneuropathy (occurs when the body is unable to regulate glucose [sugar] in the blood, with nerve damage. Clinical records also indicated Resident 88 was on hospice care. During an observation on 3/10/2022 at 9:51 a.m., Resident 88 was asleep,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-15 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility had a 6.67% medication error rate when two medication errors out of 30 opportunities were observed during medication pass for one of six residents (Resident 378). Resident 378 received Trospium (a medication used to relax the bladder muscles to improve control of urination) not in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications and did not receive Isosorbide Mononitrate (a medication used to prevent chest pain in patients with a certain heart condition) as scheduled. These failures had the potential to result in compromising the health and safety of the residents. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 378's medical record, the physician orders, dated March 2022, indicated an order for Trospium Chloride 20 mg (milligrams, a unit of measure), give one tablet by mouth once a day start date 2/26/22. During a medication pass observation on 3/8/22 at 9:10 a.m. in Resident 378's room, LVN T was observed administrating multiple medications including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-03-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer, administer, and track pneumococcal vaccine (PV, immunization against bacterial that causes pneumonia, one type of lung infection) for two of 24 sampled residents (Resident 40 and 53). This failure had the potential to cause the health complications for the residents. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 53's clinical record indicated, Resident 53 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of depressive disorder (mood disorder which interferes with daily life), anxiety disorder (persistent feeling of worry and apprehension), Dementia (a condition characterized by memory loss) without behavioral disturbance, and history of venous thrombosis (a blood clot reduces the flow of blood in a blood vessel) and embolism (a blood clot blocks the flow of blood in a blood vessel). Review of Resident 53's immunization record, indicated Resident 53 had the Pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13, a vaccine to protect against 13 types of pneumococcal bacteria that causes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comply with national guidelines and facility policy to ensure food procurement, store, prepare and served under sanitary conditions. These failures had the potential to effect food quality and safety. Findings: Brief initial tour of the facility kitchen with the dietary manager (DM) was initiated on 11/18/19 at 7:59 a.m. The following were observed and acknowledged: 1. no air gap noted beneath the ice machine 2. kitchen prep sink leaking underneath into a big basin 3. four trays of ice cream cups and one-half head of cabbage in the refrigerator undated 4. bell pepper noted with black spots in the refrigerator 5. one box of opened sausage and four bags of hash browns in the freezer not dated 6. four containers of oatmeal, thickener, rice and flour with open lids 7. employee jacket in the dry storage room 8. one bottle of black sauce not labeled and not dated 1. During an observation with the DM on 11/18/19 at 8:05 a.m., no air gap noted beneath the ice machine in the kitchen. During an observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-11-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement it's infection control program to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission/spread of infection for 4 of 25 sampled residents when: 1. Failed to sanitize hands after taking a residents blood pressure and before returning to the medication cart 2. Nursing staff failed to observe aseptic (sterile) technique and perform handwashing/hygiene after when performing trache care. 3. Visitor coming from one resident isolation room was walking int he hallways wuith her isolation gown and gloves on. 4. For Resident 104, facility failed to change the suprapubic catheter as needed when bag was soiled (a hollow flexible tube that is used to drain urine from the bladder) as ordered by the physician. These failures had the potential to result in the transmission and spread of infection. Findings: 1. During a medication administration observation on 11/18/19 at 9:21 a.m., licensed vocational nurse D (LVN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that maintained or promoted the dignity and respect for two of two residents (Residents 60 and 375) when the door was not closed and the privacy curtains were not drawn to prevent them from being unnecessarily exposed to public view. This deficient practice had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to the residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 11/20/19 at 1:03 p.m., while walking in the hallway with other residents, staff and visitors, Resident 60's door was wide open and the privacy curtain was not drawn. Resident 60's legs and thighs, and an incontinent pad were exposed to the public view. Concurrent this observation was validated by the certified nursing assistant B (CNA B) who immediately closed the privacy curtain. Resident 60 stated, I feel hot, so I don't cover my legs with sheets, but I don't want people looking at my bottom too. 2. During an observation and concurrent interview on 11/18/19 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 375 was lying on her bed and the speech therapist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure no medications were kept at bedside for one of one resident (Resident 373) without a physician's order, care plan, and prior self administration and interdisciplinary team (IDT, facility staff members from different departments who coordinate care provided to residents) assessments done. This failure had the potential for improper administration of medications, could possibly cause adverse drug reactions or side effects. Findings: During an observation with registered nurse A (RN A) on 11/18/19 at 12:44 p.m., RN A confirmed there was an opened blue bottle of liquid Antacid (medication that help neutralize stomach acid) and a bottle of Flonase nasal spray (used to treat nasal congestion, sneezing, runny nose, and itchy or watery eyes caused by seasonal or year-round allergies) kept at the bedside. RN A stated, there should be no medications kept at the bedside without a physician's order and prior assessments. During an interview and concurrent record review on 11/18/19 at 1:16 p.m., RN A could not find…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for three of three sampled residents (Residents 12, 373 and 383) when: 1. Resident 12's care plan for dementia was not developed upon admission; 2. Resident 373's care plan for pain management was not developed upon admission; and 3. Resident 383's care plan for wound vacuum management was not developed upon admission. A care plan identifies residents' concerns, and outlines the care and services needed to meet their needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 12's admission Record indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - and behavioral abilities to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). Review of Resident 12's clinical record indicated he did not have a care plan for his diagnoses of dementia. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 11/22/19 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and revise the care plan (provide direction for individualized care) for four of 25 sampled residents (Residents 13, 88, 90, and 373) when: 1. For Resident 13, the care plan for actual impairment to skin integrity was not implemented; 2. For Resident 88, the care plan for fluoxetine (medication for depression) was not developed; 3. For Resident 90, the care plan for tube feeding was not revised; 4. For Resdient 373, the care plans for refusing daily weights and missing one scheduled dialysis were not developed. These failures had the potential resident care and services not meeting individual needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 13's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE] with including diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), hearing loss, chronic pain, and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). Review of Resident 88's care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders according to professional standards of practice for one of 1 sampled residents (54). For Resident 54, physician orders were not followed when registered nurse C (RN C) did not check enteral feeding (tube feeding; nutrition taken through a tube that goes directly into the stomach) residuals (volume of fluid remaining in the stomach) prior to medication administration. These failures had the potential to compromise resident health. Findings: During a medication pass administration observation on 11/18/19 at 1:33 p.m., in Resident 54's room RN C did not check enteral feeding residuals prior to medication administration. During an interview with RN C on 11/18/19 at 1:50 p.m., she stated, I gave her meds earlier and I did not want her to wait any longer. During a concurrent review of Resident 54's physician orders and interview with the director of nurses (DON) on 11/19/19 at 8:46 a.m., she stated the physician orders indicated to check residuals before medication administration. The DON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for eight of 25 sampled residents (Residents 90, 13, 78, 45, 49, 54, 58, and 76) when the restorative nursing assistance (RNA, it helps the residents to gain an improved quality of life by increasing their level of strength and mobility) program was not provided as scheduled. This failure had the potential not to meet the goal and address their needs. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 90's undated face sheet indicated he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (memory problem), hypertension (increase blood pressure), and dependence on wheelchair. His minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/24/19, indicated he was severely impaired in decision making, functional limitation in range of motion was impaired on one side of the body on upper and lower extremities. Review of Resident 90's documentation survey report, indicated passive range of motion (PROM) on upper extremities and bilateral lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and treatment was provided for one of one sampled resident (Resident 383) for the administration of parenteral (intravenous [IV] infusion of various solutions to maintain adequate hydration) fluids consistent with the facility's policy and professional standards when the: 1. The physician's orders for total parenteral nutrition (TPN, a way of supplying all the nutritional needs of the body by bypassing the digestive system and giving nutrient solution directly into a vein) was not followed. The TPN and peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC, a long, slender, flexible tube inserted into a peripheral vein, typically in the upper arm, and advanced until the catheter tip terminates in a large vein in the chest near the heart to obtain intravenous access) care plan was not developed. 2. Monitoring of the intake and output every shift was not completed, and the physician's order for fluid restriction was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate care and services for one of two dialysis-dependent residents (Resident 373) when: 1. Renal diet was not ordered as per resident's preference and needs 2. Dialysis was not done as per physician's order 3. Congestive Heart Failure (CHF, failure of the heart to pump adequate amount of blood that causes symptoms of shortness of breath, weakness, fatigue, and swelling of the legs, ankles, and feet) protocol was not done every shift per MD order. 4. Licensed nurses lack of knowledge on the resident's appropriate dialysis access care. These failures had the potential to affect Resident 383's care and health outcomes by placing Resident at risk for complications. Findings: A review or Resident 373's medical record indicated admission on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetis mellitus (the body either doesn't produce enough insulin, or it resists insulin) with diabetic chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease (ESRD, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two of four sampled residents (Residents 88 and 427) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) when: 1. For Resident 88, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for Prozac (medication for depression); 2. For Resident 427, the facility failed to ensure as needed medication (PRN) had a rationale for continued use for Ativan (medication for anxiety) and a non- pharmacological intervention was attempted before giving Ativan. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 88's clinical record indicated he was admitted [DATE] with including diagnoses of depressive disorder (mood disorder which interferes with daily life), hypertension (increase blood pressure), and diabetes (increase blood sugar). Review of Resident 88's order summary sheet dated 1/31/19,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-11-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and biologicals were labeled and stored appropriately when: 1. One expired medication was found in the medication storage room refrigerator 2. One vial of Novolog insulin was found on station 2 med cart. These findings had the potential to result in the accidental administration of expired medications. 3. Home medications labeled by outside pharmacy with MD order to be taken by Resident 373 were not verified by facility in house pharmacy. Findings: 1. During a medication storage room refrigerator observation on 11/18/19 at 9:50 a.m., with the director of nurses (DON), a bottle of Firvano (medication used to treat infections) was found with an expiration date of 10/31/19. The DON acknowledged the medication was expired. During a concurrent interview with the DON she stated expired medications needed to be discarded. 2. During a medication administration observation on 11/18/19 at 1:15 p.m., with registered nurse C (RN C) a vial of Novolog insulin (medication used to regulate he amount of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure laboratory tests were done as physician ordered for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 12 and 94) when: 1. Resident 12's valproic acid level (a test measures the amount of valproic acid in a blood sample; valproic acid is a drug used to prevent seizures) was not done every three months; and 2. Resident 94's hemoglobin and hematocrit (H & H test; hemoglobin is the protein contained in red blood cells that is responsible for delivery of oxygen to the tissues; hematocrit measures the volume of red blood cells compared to the total blood volume), prealbumin (a blood test that used to see if a person is getting enough nutrition; prealbumin is a protein made by the liver, and the body uses prealbumin to make other proteins), and albumin (a blood test used to screen for and help diagnose a liver disorder or kidney disease; albumin is a protein made by the liver) was not done monthly. These failures had the potential to result in abnormal laboratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-11-22 · tag F0800 — isolatedProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the registered dietitian's (RD) recommendation was communicated and coordinated with the primary care physician for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents 58 and 84) in a timely manner. This failure had the potential in delay in meeting the residents' nutritional needs. Findings: Review of Resident 58's clinical record indicated she had diagnoses that included diabetes mellitus (abnormally high sugar level in the blood), anemia (lack of enough red blood cell component of blood the carry oxygen to the body's tissues), and depression (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Review of Resident 58's clinical record dated 9/25/19 indicated an RD's recommendation for primary care physician to consider prescribing appetite stimulant for Resident 58 due to no appetite. Further review of Resident 58's clinical record indicated there was no evidence of documentation that the RD's above recommendation was communicated to the Resident 58's primary care physician. Review of Resident 84's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COVENANT CARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVENANT CARE CALIFORNIA, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT CARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE CAPITAL INVESTORS V, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (B), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (Q), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (S), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND, L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT SUBCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| STATE TREASURER OF MICH CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPL RTMNT SYSTEMS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| STOCKWELL FUND II LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| EVANS, MARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| LEVIN, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| SIMS, CHRISTINE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| TOROK, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 02/20/2014 |
| ASHLEY, DAVA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/26/2018 |
| CARNEY, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2013 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/17/2018 |
| SPARKS, CAROL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/17/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056116. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.