Shoreline Care Center
5225 South J Street, Oxnard, CA 93033 · For profit - Corporation · 193 certified beds · (805) 488-3696 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2025
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $28,248 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-16)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 8.1% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.9% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.8% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.5% | 10.2% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.5% | 12.0% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 26.7% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.21 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.74 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 46.0%CMS range 35.8–52.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.0–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 40.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 29.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 4.1–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.33 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 193 beds and averages 179.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to: Provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) to prevent accidents. Additionally, the facility failed to: -Accurately assessed Resident 1's risk for elopement. -Follow interventions for the administration of anti-anxiety medications. -Call the physician/medical practitioner for change in condition (increased agitation) to seek appropriate care intervention for Resident 1. -Place Resident 1 in a room farther away from the fire exit door which opens to a busy street. These failures resulted in Resident 1 opening an exit door on 2/14/25 between 5:30 a.m. to 5:35 a.m., walked to a busy street, was hit by a moving vehicle, sustained fatal injuries, and was pronounced dead at a local hospital on 2/14/25 at 6:40 a.m. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet indicated Resident 1 was a [AGE] year old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (signifies memory loss,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow nursing standards of practice when duplicate medication orders were not clarified with the physician prior to administration for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in confusion and a medication error resulting in Resident 1 receiving three (3) extra doses of medication jeopardizing Resident 1's health and safety.Findings:During a review of [NAME] and [NAME], Tenth Edition, Elsevier, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 609 in the section titled, Medication Administration, indicated, If there is any question about a medication order because it is incomplete, illegible, vague, or not understood, contact the health care provider before administering the medication.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Errors and Adverse Reactions, dated 4/2025, the P&P indicated that, It is the policy of this facility that medication errors and adverse drug reactions must be reported to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff knocked and announced their presence prior to entering a resident's room for one of six sampled resident (Resident 5).This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents' dignity and right to privacy, and cause embarrassment, discomfort or loss of respect.Findings:During an observation on 4/21/26 at 11:02 a.m., the Maintenance Assistant (MA) was observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER] without knocking on the door or announcing presence. Resident 5 was observed lying in bed. The MA proceeded into the room without obtaining permission to enter.During an interview on 4/21/26 at 11:05 a.m. outside the south dining room with MA, MA stated I usually enter if the door is open. I don't always knock because I'm just there to do something quickly.During an interview on 4/22/26 at 4:32 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), DON stated, The facility expectation is for all staff to knock and announce themselves prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 26) had the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-an evaluation to confirm that an individual has a mental illness) Determination Report recommended specialized services (services that exceed the services ordinarily provided by the nursing facility) for psychotherapy/counseling implemented. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 26 having increased psychiatric symptoms.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, PASRR, dated 5/2025, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that each resident is properly screened using the PASRR specified by the State. Evaluation must be completed by an approved state contractor, and a Determination made by the appropriate MI [mental illness] . state authority. During a concurrent interview and record review on 4/23/26 at 2:14 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 26's PASRR Individualized Determination Report (PASRR-IDR), dated 1/4/22, was reviewed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure:1. One of four behavior-emotional sampled residents (Resident 51) had a comprehensive care plan (CP) that included an intervention that was not implemented and an intervention that was not supportive of Resident 51's CP goal. This failure resulted in Resident 51's psychosocial needs not being met.2. One of eight Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-an evaluation to confirm that an individual has a mental illness) sampled residents (Resident 26) had the PASRR recommendations incorporated into their CP and had interventions (actions to be taken to maintain or improve a goal) that were measurable and clearly identified what was being measured. This failure resulted in Resident 26's psychosocial needs not being met. 1. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, dated 1/2026, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 133), had a care plan (CP- an individualized plan for consistently managing a resident's care needs) reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team (IDT-a group of medical professionals who work together with the resident to develop a CP) after an assessment of Resident 133's ability to comply with the facility's smoking policy. This failure resulted in Resident 133 storing his smoking material in an unsafe location and becoming belligerent to staff who tried to enforce the smoking policy.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Planning, dated 1/2026, the P&P indicated, It is the policy of this facility that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) shall develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. The resident's comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and/or revised by the IDT after each assessment. During a review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate audiology (hearing) referral was implemented for one of 35 sampled residents (Resident 136) with hearing impairment. This failure resulted in a delay in the provision of care, treatment, and services for all residents requiring a referral for care.During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Hearing Services, dated 11/2011, the P&P indicated, The resident will be referred as needed for a hearing evaluation. The SSD will keep at least one hearing amplifier available for new residents who are hard of hearing or as a temporary intervention if a resident's hearing aid is missing or lost.During a review of Resident 136's admission Record (AR), dated 4/24/2026, the AR indicated, Resident 136 was admitted in the facility on 1/7/2026 with diagnoses including, muscle weakness, gastrostomy tube (tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach), and type 2 diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 133), had their smoking privileges restricted when they refused to comply with the facility smoking policy to store their cigarette lighter in a secure box. This failure had the potential to result in avoidable accidents by other residents having access to the lighter. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Smoking Policy, dated [DATE], the P&P indicated, If IDT [interdisciplinary team is a group of medical professionals who work together with the resident to focus on resident-centered care] determines that the resident is unable to safely store their smoking materials or require supervision to smoke safely, smoking products will be kept in a secured cabinet, only accessible to staff. Upon quarterly review by the IDT. smoking residents will be re-assessed as to their ability to smoke safely. and their ability to understand and comply with facility smoking policy.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the observance of infection control practices and protocols for one of six sampled residents (Resident 140), when 1. a foley catheter dignity bag (a discreet pouch/bag to keep/hide urine drainage bags for privacy and dignity) was observed in contact with the floor and 2. the facility stored outdated food products in the kitchen refrigerator.These failures had the potential to result in a significant infection control risk such as a catheter associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) and food-born illness to all residents. 1) During an observation, on 4/21/26, at 9:43 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER]A, Resident 140 was lying in bed. The bed was positioned at its lowest setting. Foley catheter urine tubing was observed on the left side of the bed, with the urine collection bag placed inside a dignity bag. The urine dignity bag bottom was in contact with the floor. During an interview, on 4/21/26, at 1:49 p.m. , with the Wound Care Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure compliance with required equipment maintenance standards when: 1. Medication refrigerators were not maintained at the proper temperatures and safe dry conditions 2. The kitchen ice machine was not maintained in safe and sanitary working conditionThese failures had the potential to result in compromising the integrity and potency of refrigerated medications and exposing residents to contaminated ice from an improperly maintained ice machine.1. During an observation, on 4/22/26, at 10:15 a.m., in the North Station medication room, the medication refrigerators' thermometer recorded a temperature at 40 degrees Fahrenheit (normal acceptable range +36 to 46 degrees Fahrenheit [2 to 8 degrees Celsius]). There was no thermometer in the freezer to record the freezer temperature (normal +5 degrees Fahrenheit or colder [-15 degrees Celsius]). The freezer compartment, positioned at the top of the medication refrigerator, was undergoing defrosting, resulting in water dripping down and accumulating on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adhere to its policy and procedure requiring staff to use English as the primary language of communication, as outlined in the facility's Official language Designation policy. This failure resulted in noncompliance with established administrative standards and oversight practices. These failures have the potential to impede effective communication, compromise residents' rights to receive information in a manner they can understand, and place residents at risk for diminished safety and quality of care.During an interview on 03/25/26 at 2:45 p.m. with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA 1) stated, that staff of certain descent were being given preferential treatment at the facility. CNA 1 stated that they had been instructed by their superiors not to speak in their native language in the presence of others and had complied with that directive. CNA 1 further stated that other staff members continued to speak their native language in front of staff and residents without corrective action, and that residents had expressed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 53 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe and implement an x-ray as ordered by the physician in one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after Resident 1 sustained a fall.This failure resulted in a delay of treatment and care of a right hip fracture for Resident 1 that went unnoticed and untreated by the facility for 7 days. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR) undated, the AR indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Anemia (condition where the body does not have enough healthy red blood cells), Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), Depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Anxiety (mental health condition characterized by excessive worry, fear, and nervousness).During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 9/19/25, Section C indicated a brief interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services provided met professional standards and principles for one of two residents (Resident 1) when mild swelling was observed on Resident 1's left hip five days after the fall incident which was not documented or monitored.This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1's care being compromised without the appropriate nursing follow-up monitoring and documentation in place.Findings:According to ANA's (American Nurses' Association) book titled, Principles for Nursing Documentation (Guidance for Registered Nurses), copyright 2010, the guidance indicated, in part, Clear, accurate, and accessible documentation is an essential element of safe, quality, evidence-based nursing practice. Documentation of nurses' work is critical as well for effective communication with each other and with other disciplines .Nurses document their work and outcomes for a number of reasons: the most important is for communicating within the health care team and providing information for other professionals .to support the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's order to monitor the respiratory rate (RR - the number of breaths per minute) was followed for one of two residents (Resident 1) prior to administration of morphine sulfate (a highly controlled substance given for severe pain). This deficient practice had the potential to cause serious side effects including respiratory depression (slow, shallow, difficulty breathing).Findings:During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, undated, the P&P indicated in part, .B. Administration.2. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the attending physician.During a review of Resident 1's clinical record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility under hospice care with the diagnosis of Vascular dementia (decline in thinking, memory and reasoning caused by damaged blood vessels), anemia (a blood condition), physical debility (physical general weakness) and COPD (lung disease).During a review of Resident 1's current Order Summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool) accurately reflected the behavior status of one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 1's plan of care and delivery of necessary care and services.During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease (disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities), psychosis (a severe mental condition in which thought, and emotions are so affected that contact is lost with reality), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). During a review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 8/28/25, the OSR indicated Quetiapine Fumarate (antipsychotic medication used to improve mood, thoughts, and behaviors) tablet 25 mg(milligrams) by mouth two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after the resident was transferred to the veteran VA hospital for medication evaluation and adjustment.The facility's failure placed Resident 1 at risk of being admitted to another facility which is far from the wife's residence therefore unable to visit frequently.A complaint was received by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) on 7/14/25 alleging that Resident 1 had been transferred to an acute care hospital for medication evaluation and adjustment. According to the information provided, a representative of the resident was informed by facility staff that the resident's bed would be held and that the resident would be readmitted to the facility following hospitalization. However, the facility subsequently declined to readmit the resident upon discharge from the hospital.During an interview on 7/14/25 at 12:15 p.m., with Resident 1's responsible person (RP - person who makes healthcare decisions for a patient who is unable), the RP reported that the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-04 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to:1. Ensure two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) were provided with a written bed-hold notification upon transfer to general acute care hospitals. 2. Ensure Resident 1's wife was provided with the bed hold private payment information before the resident was transferred to the veteran (VA) emergency department (ED).These failures resulted in the residents not having a bed-hold and were at risk of not being able to return to the facility.1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Admission, Transfer, Discharge and Bed-Holds, dated 12/2016, indicated Upon transfer or discharge, a notice of transfer and discharge, as well as the bed-hold notification will be completed and given to the resident at the time of transfer or discharge or as soon as practicable. In the BED HOLD and readmission section of the policy indicated the facility will notify the resident or resident representative at the time of admission and again prior to hospital transfer or therapeutic leave, of the bed hold and readmissions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident 2) was protected from physical and verbal abuse from a fellow resident (Resident 1) who was having undirected behavioral symptoms and outbursts. This facility failure resulted in Resident 2 being slapped by Resident 1 and sustaining bruises (purplish/reddish skin discoloration) to the left arm and hand. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 2 had diagnoses including, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes breathing difficult), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood), anxiety disorder (excessive feelings of worry, fear, and unease that significantly interfere with daily life), and depression (feeling of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities previously enjoyed). During a review of Resident 2's Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation (SBAR), dated 5/24/25, the SBAR indicated, around 1 a.m. Resident 2 was slapped by another…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-01 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - a group of medical staff that work together to provide care of residents) failed to initiate a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA - a comprehensive assessment) for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Resident 1 refused to take schizophrenia (mental disorder that affects how a person thinks, feels, and behaves), depression (persistent feelings of sadness that interfere with daily life) and other medications. As a result, Resident 1 developed severe symptoms of distress including psychosis (loss of touched with reality), delusions, hallucinations, and paranoia. 2. Resident 1 showed physical and verbal aggression towards other residents and staff, and refused to follow the facility's smoking rules. These failures resulted in Resident 1's escalating behavior becoming more erratic, with increased aggressiveness toward others. No appropriate clinical interventions were implemented, which placed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1), had their health status accurately documented on the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS: a comprehensive assessment that helps nursing home staff identify health problems and track the improvement or decline of those problems). This failure had the potential to result in an inaccurate plan of care, compromising the resident's quality of life and leading to unmet needs, inappropriate interventions, and negative health outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, fracture of right and left calcaneus (breaks in both heel bones), psychosis (loss of contact with reality, symptoms of hallucinations delusions and disorganized thinking), unspecified schizophrenia (psychotic symptoms that do not meet the criteria for a more specific schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder), chronic pain,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan (a plan that includes clear goals to meet a resident's needs) when: 1. Female staff were not consistently assigned to Resident 1 as care planned. This failure had the potential to cause emotional distress and compromise Resident 1's psychosocial well-being. 2. Resident 1's cam boot (foot/ankle brace) was replaced with a non-weight-bearing immobilizer cast (a stiff wrap that keeps an injured area stable) on the left foot with no protocol in place for care. This failure had the potential to result in poor circulatory function and delayed healing of Resident 1's left foot fracture. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, psychosis (loss of contact with reality, hallucinations, delusions and disorganized thinking) and unspecified schizophrenia (mental disorder characterized…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices in one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 2's respiratory care equipment was not stored in a manner to prevent cross-contamination (accidentally transferring harmful bacteria) or labeled/dated. These facility failures had the potential to result in cross-contamination that could negatively impact Resident 2's health and safety and cause preventable HAIs (Healthcare Associated Infections). Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated, Resident 2 had diagnoses including, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes breathing difficult), acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen levels in the blood), anxiety disorder (excessive feelings of worry, fear, and unease that significantly interfere with daily life), and depression (feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest in activities previously enjoyed). During an observation on 6/2/25 at 5:18 p.m. inside Resident 2's room, a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's South Side dining room was safe and clean as evidenced by: 1. A wet and dirty plastic container, surrounded by flying insects (fruit flies), was underneath the sink while ten residents were inside the dining room eating lunch. 2. Next to the sink was a trash can surrounded by flying insects (flies). 3. The corner next to the sink was dirty and the walls had food particles adhered to the wall. 4. The sink had been nonfunctional since 6/1/25, was not covered and without any signage indicating the sink was not working. 5. The dining room floor has broken tiles in multiple areas. 6. The dining room had lots of dark stains especially around the corners. These facility failures exposed residents to risks of contamination, cross-contamination, illness, infection, and injuries from tripping and falling. Findings: 1. A review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Safe, Clean, Comfortable, and Home like Environment, dated 6/2023, indicates In accordance with Residents Rights, the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report a resident's fall incident with fracture to the Department for one of two residents (Resident 1). Resident 1 experienced an unwitnessed fall, complained of pain on the left hip with an X-ray (process of imaging, using radiation) that indicated an acute fracture. This failure delayed the Department's investigation into the incident and had the potential for Resident 1 and other residents to experience a decline in safety, comfort, and overall well-being. Findings: On 5/16/25, an unannounced visit was made to the facility to investigate a complaint regarding a resident's unwitnessed fall. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, this indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a group of thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning) and fracture in the right femur (break in the right leg bone). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-18 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to change a hearing aid filter for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) per instructions from an outside clinic. This failure had the potential for Resident 1's hearing aid to be less effective, potentially impacting Resident 1's ability to hear and communicate. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/16/25, beginning at 3:30 p.m., with the Health Information Manager (HIM 1) and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON 1), Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1 had an appointment at an outpatient clinic on 2/27/25, where Resident 1 returned to the facility with new hearing aids. The outside clinic provided instructions to change the hearing aid filter once a month. The HIM 1 and ADON 1 verbalized Resident 1's hearing aid filter should have been changed on 3/27/25, but it did not happen until 4/8/25. The ADON 1 verbalized the facility could not provide documentation indicating when it received Resident 1's office visit summary with care instructions for Resident 1's 2/27/25 outpatient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its scabies (a contagious skin disease marked by itching and small raised red spots, caused by mites) protocol for one of three sampled Residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for scabies to spread throughout the facility. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/17/25, at 1:50 p.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON 1), Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was seen by a Dermatologist (a medical practitioner specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of skin disorders) on 4/4/25, where Resident 1 was suspected to have scabies. Resident 1 was prescribed Permethrin 5% cream (a medication commonly used to treat scabies). The ADON 1 verbalized the facility could not provide documentation indicating it placed Resident 1 on enhanced barrier precautions on 4/4/25, upon return to the facility, when Resident 1 was suspected of having scabies. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 4/17/25, at 2:48 p.m., with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for the administration of insulin for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential to expose Resident 1 to unsafe insulin doses, and preventable medication errors. Findings: During a concurrent record review and interview, on 3/12/25, beginning at 3:10 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and Health Information Manager (HIM 1), Resident 1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed. Resident 1 had an order for Novolog (a fast acting insulin) 100 unit/ml(milliliter) FLEXPEN (a device used to deliver the insulin) inject as per sliding scale .BS (blood sugar) more than 401 give 16 units and call MD. On 1/25/25, Resident 1's blood sugar was 481. Resident 1's Progress Notes indicated a nurse administered only 14 units of insulin and called the MD. The DON 1 and HIM 1 verbalized the nurse administered the incorrect amount of insulin. The DON 1 and HIM 1 could not provide documentation indicating Resident 1's physician acknowledged the nurses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide quality care for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when: 1. Numerous medications were not administered to Resident 1, due to Resident 1 being offsite at a dialysis center. 2. Physical therapy sessions were not provided to Resident 1 as ordered. 3. There was a facility delay following physician orders for Resident 1 to begin weight bearing physical therapy. These facility failures had the potential to result in negative outcomes for Resident 1 and for a delay in care. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (a severe condition where the kidneys permanently lose their ability to function properly) type two diabetes (a disease in which blood sugar levels are to high) and dependence on renal dialysis (a life sustaining treatment that filters blood when kidneys fail to remove waste end excess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when an interdisciplinary team (IDT- team members from different discipline with common purpose, to set goals, share responsibilities and make decisions together) admission assessment form was incomplete. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to have inaccurate and incomplete medical records which could affect the care being provided to them. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), dated 2/28/25, the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include COVID-19 (contagious viral infection that affects breathing) and Alzheimer's Disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During a concurrent interview and record review on 2/28/25 at 12:10 p.m. with the Director of Nursing (DON), Resident 1's IDT admission Assessment, dated 2/18/25 was reviewed. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment (an assessment tool) for one of two residents (Resident 1). As a result, the elopement risk assessment did not accurately reflect Resident 1's status. Findings: A review of Resident 1's face sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (signifies memory loss, impaired thinking). During the interview on 2/28/25 at 1:45 p.m., with a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA2), CNA2 stated there was an instance in January 2025 when Resident 1 went outside the main entrance door in South station by following a visitor who was going out when the door opened. CNA2 reported the incident to charge nurse. During a review of Resident1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated February 2025, under behavior monitoring, this indicated two episodes of anxiety (one episode on 2/4 and another on 2/6), and one episode of paranoia (suspiciousness) on 2/2.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions of a behavioral care plan was implemented for one of two residents (Resident 1). This failure resulted in increased behavioral episodes of aggression, anxiety and paranoia (suspiciousness) for Resident 1. Findings: A review of the facility's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia (signifies memory loss, impaired thinking). A review of Resident1's initial psychiatric evaluation by a practitioner dated 8/8/25, this indicated Resident1 was in the hospital due to code 5150 (danger to self and others), struck another resident on admission day, was easily agitated, and was given 1:1 care (1 staff assigned solely to Resident1). A review or Resident 1's care plan dated 8/6/24, indicated focused care on anxiety manifested by aggressiveness or wandering/pacing agitated behavior, and poor impulse control with the goals of reducing anxiety, to keep self and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment in two shower rooms. These facility failures had the potential to negatively impact residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 1/28/25, starting at 4:41 p.m., with the Health Information Manager (HIM 1), the facility's shower rooms were observed. Inside shower room one, located in the south wing of the facility, eight clean/unused razers were found on top of a dirty sharp's container. Inside shower room two, located in the south wing of the facility, seven clean/unused razers were found on top of the dirty sharp's container. The HIM 1 verbalized the clean/unused razers should have been stored at the nurse's station, inside a cabinet, and not on top of the dirty sharp's containers in both shower rooms. Shower room two, located in the south side of the facility along with shower room two, located in the central wing of the facility had broken floor tiles. The HIM 1 confirmed the broken floor tiles in both the south and central wings shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, the facility's kitchen staff failed to maintain clean food preparation equipment, date and label leftovers, thaw raw meat properly, wear gloves when handling ready-to-eat (RTE) food, and ensure hair restraints were worn in the food preparation areas. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings included: 1. A facility policy titled, Kitchen Sanitation & [and] Cleaning Schedules, effective in February 2009, indicated 2.0 POLICY Maintain a clean, sanitary, and safe kitchen. The policy indicated, 3.0 PROCEDURE 1. The Food and Dining Services Manager develops, implements, and monitors a cleaning schedule that assigns specific cleaning responsibilities to specific individuals. The policy further indicated, The Food and Dining Services Manager/designee will check the cleaning schedule at the end of each shift to assure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly affecting 3 of 3 dumpsters. Specifically, the trash and recycle dumpster lids were open with overflowing trash piled up over the top of the dumpsters and trash and debris was on the ground surrounding the base of the dumpsters. This had the potential to affect all 171 residents who resided in the facility at the time of the survey. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Garbage & Rubbish Disposal, effective in February 2009, indicated, 1.0 PURPOSE Maintain a sanitary and safe environment through effective disposal of garbage and rubbish. The policy indicated the section titled 3.0 PROCEDURE included 8. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services must be kept closed and free of litter around the dumpster area. During a concurrent observation and interview on 01/13/2025 at 9:15 AM, one recycle dumpster was observed with both lids open and one trash dumpster with one of two lids open with overflowing trash piled up over the top of the dumpster. An…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from physical abuse by a resident during 4 (10/28/2024, 12/15/2024, 12/19/2024, and 01/12/2025) of 4 incidents of resident-to-resident abuse involving Resident #118. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Alleged or Suspected Abuse and Crime Reporting, revised 10/2022, indicated, Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation. The policy further indicated, The facility will monitor the adequacy of assessment, care planning and monitoring of residents with needs or behaviors that may likely lead to conflict, altercation, abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation and mistreatment such as, which included, Physically aggressive or self-injurious behaviors. Resident #118's admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 08/02/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia, psychosis, and anxiety…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, facility policy review, and review of the California Department of Health Care Services Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I Assessment Guide, the facility failed to ensure Level I PASRR screenings were accurate and also failed to submit a new Level I PASRR screening after a resident remained in the facility longer than 30 days, during which they were exempt from the requirement. The deficiencies affected 3 (Residents #26, #103, and #129) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR [Preadmission Screening and Resident Review; PASRR] Program, reviewed/revised 05/2024, revealed, This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and Resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. The policy revealed, 1. Applicants to this facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-16 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document and policy review, the facility failed to serve meals according to the recipes for the planned menu for residents prescribed a pureed diet. Specifically, staff pureed plain beef instead of beef stew, mixed breadcrumbs in water in place of sliced bread to make pureed bread and served applesauce in place of pureed baked apple slices to residents on a pureed diet. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 22 residents who received pureed diets. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Menus, effective February 2009, indicated, 1.0 PURPOSE To ensure food variety, adequate nutrition, and allow for effective planning of food and dining service. The policy indicated the section titled 2.0 FUNDAMENTAL INFORMATION included 3. Therapeutic (Special) diet descriptions/extensions are written for physician-ordered special diets. The policy further indicated the section titled 4.0 PROCEDURE included 6. Recipes are available for use and will be utilized. A facility policy titled, Therapeutic Diets, effective February 2009,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-17 · tag F0837 — isolatedEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to obtain a physician order, prior to providing one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) with psychological services. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive services not approved by a physician. Findings: During a concurrent record review and interview, on 9/17/24, starting at 11:01 a.m., with the Health Information Manager (HIM 1) Resident 1 ' s medical record was reviewed. When asked if Resident 1 was receiving psychological services while at the facility, the HIM 1 verbalzied yes. Resident 1 ' s medical record indicated Resident 1 had received psychological services from 11/1/23 to 7/17/24. The HIM 1 could not provide documentation indicating Resident 1 ' s physician had written an order for Resident 1 to receive psychological services. During an interview on 9/19/24, at 1:48 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1), the DON 1 verbalzied the facility could not provide documentation indicating Resident 1 ' s physician had written and order for psychological services. During a review of the facility ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for wound care treatment were followed, for one of two sampled Residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience complications from worsening pressure ulcers including increased pain and wound infections. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's admission Record undated, the admission Record indicated in part, Resident 1 had diagnoses including a pressure ulcer (an injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) of the sacral region (lower back area), which was unstageable (full thickness tissue loss), Type Two Diabetes (a chronic condition that causes high blood glucose levels in the blood, which in turn, can delay and/or complicate wound healing), and abnormalities of gait (walking) and mobility (movement). During a concurrent record review and interview, on 8/20/24, starting at 2:00 p.m., with the Health Information Manger (HIM 1), Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1's Order Details undated, indicated in part, Resident 1's physician on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reorder medication from the pharmacy according to their policy and procedure, for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to trigger seizures (sudden, uncontrolled burst of electrical activity in brain that can cause temporary changes in behavior, movement, feelings, and level of consciousness) to Resident 1 that can lead to fall or other serious injuries. Findings: During a review of medical records (admission, assessments, history and physical), indicated Resident 1 was admitted in the facility on 4/24/24 with diagnosis of other seizures. BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status- a tool used to screen and identify cognitive condition of residents upon admission into a long-term care facility) score of 15 indicated Resident 1 has an intact cognition. Per history and physical as indicated in the order summary, physician determines Resident 1 has the mental capacity to make healthcare decisions. Order summary indicated Resident 1 has an order for Lacosamide (medication to treat partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident room and restroom, in a clean and homelike manner. This failure had the potential to negatively impact residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation, and interview, on 6/20/24, starting at 3:30 p.m., with the Maintenance Director (MTD 1), Resident 2's room was toured. Inside Resident 2's room, the wall was observed in multiple places, to be in a state of disrepair, with large scrapes and areas of missing paint. Inside Resident 2's restroom, a hand sanitizing dispenser, located above the sink, was missing a front cover. The MTD 1 verbalized the wall would need to be repaired and a front cover would need to be installed on the hand sanitizing dispenser. The MTD 1 confirmed these environmental concerns had not been reported by staff nor were these environmental concerns listed on the maintenance log, as items that needed to be addressed. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Environmental Quality dated 10/22, indicated in part It is the policy of this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and revise the care plan for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after a verbal altercation with another resident. This failure had the potential to cause psychosocial harm to Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to Shoreline Care Center on 2/28/24, with a primary diagnosis of Unspecified Intracranial Injury (trauma to the head) with Loss of Consciousness. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) cognitive assessment tool reveals Resident 1 of having Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score 09 (moderately impaired cognition), indicating a mental capacity for an interview. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/13/24 at 2:30 p.m. at room [ROOM NUMBER], Resident 1 was observed laying in her bed, calm and cooperative, call lights within reach. Resident 1 stated that she became nauseous (urge to vomit), anxious (experiencing worry, unease, or nervousness), and unable to sleep for few nights after the incident last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 eloped (a situation where a resident leaves the facility, without the knowledge of the staff) on two separate occasions. This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to suffer negative outcomes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record undated, indicated in part, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including psychosis (a collection of symptoms that affect the mind, where there has been some loss of contact with reality) stimulant dependence (a condition where a person misuses certain drugs or medications to the point that it has negative effects on their life), post-traumatic stress disorder (a psychiatric disorder that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event, series of events, or set of circumstances), and history of traumatic brain injury (an injury that affects how the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses (LNs) were competent in providing quality of care for two of 2 sampled residents when they failed to: 1. Complete a comprehensive assessment and individualized care plan related to Resident 1's change of condition (COC), did not report to the attending physician after monitoring the COC for possible further instructions and/or orders. 2. Notify the responsible party on an open lesion documented by LN3 on admission. These failures had the potential for delayed identification of change in health status and implementation of needed healthcare interventions. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record, dated 11/09/23, this indicated in part that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included acute osteomyelitis, venous insufficiency, localized edema, diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2 without complications. During a review of Resident 1's Initial Evaluation, History and Physical Examination dated 11/09/23, Resident 1 has a significant history of seizure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms in a clean and homelike environment when: 1. Broken floor tiles observed in two resident rooms. 2. An electrical fan was covered in dust/debris. These facility failures had the potential to negatively impact residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/9/23, at 12:12 p.m. with the maintenance director (MTD 1), room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floors were observed with broken floor tiles. The MTD 1 confirmed both rooms had a broken floor tile and verbalized they needed to be replaced. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/9/23, at 12:22 p.m. with MTD 1, in room [ROOM NUMBER], an electrical fan was covered in dust/debris. The MTD 1 acknowledged the electrical fan was dirty and it needed to be cleaned. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Safe and Homelike Environment dated 2/5/20, indicated in part Housekeeping and maintenance services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a bed remote control and call light in safe operating conditions. These facility failures had the potential for equipment to be unsafe for use. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/9/23, at 12:06 p.m. with the maintenance director (MTD 1), in room [ROOM NUMBER], a bed remote control and call light were observed with exposed wiring. The MTD 1 confirmed the exposed wiring on the bed remote control and call light and verbalized both needed to be replaced. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Rights, dated 10/22, indicated in part The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0924 — isolatedPut firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a handrail was in good working order. This facility failure had the potential to place a resident at risk for an avoidable accident. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/9/23, at 12:28 p.m. with the maintenance director (MTD 1), outside room [ROOM NUMBER], a handrail was observed in a state of disrepair and not securely fastened to the wall. The MTD 1 verbalized being unaware of the issue and further verbalized the broken handrail would need to be fixed/replaced. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Rights, dated 10/22, indicated in part Report any unresolved environmental concerns to the Administrator, The policy further indicated The resident has a right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents and unauthorized personnel had no access to an open, unlocked supply delivery door. This failure had the potential for residents to go out of the facility unnoticed, into a busy street causing safety issues or for an unauthorized person to enter the facility unnoticed, placing the welfare and safety of residents and staff at risk. Findings: During a facility tour on 9/14/23 at 11:20 AM, a door next to the facility's locked unit (station for residents with memory loss and wandering behavior) marked For deliveries, was observed to be unlocked, with easy access in and out of the facility to a busy street. During a concurrent observation and interview on 9/14/23 at 11:40 AM with a licensed nurse (LN1), the delivery door was observed unlocked. LN1 acknowledged the delivery door was open and unlocked, and indicated the door should always be closed and locked. During a review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Instructions. Door, Locks and Alarms, dated 6/2/2023, the P&P indicated, Test doors and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide showers for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). This failure resulted in Resident 1's grooming and personal hygiene not maintained and had a potential to affect Resident 1's quality of life. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical records (CR), this indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to multiple fractures of left side ribs, difficulty in walking, and generalized muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 08/10/23, indicated Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with bathing. During a concurrent record review and interview, on 9/21/23 starting at 11:44 A.M., the bathing record for Resident 1 was reviewed and discussed with the director of nursing (DON); the bathing (ADL documentation) record indicated from 8/11/23 to 8/19/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-25 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 1) was seen by the physician every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission as stipulated in the regulation. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not able to discuss and not offered to participate in his treatment plans. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's clinical records (CR), this indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated, 08/10/23 indicated Resident 1 is cognitively intact. During a concurrent record review and interview, on 9/21/23 at 1:40 P.M., the record titled, Physician Visit for Resident 1 was reviewed and discussed with the director of nursing (DON); the History and Physical record indicated the physician handwrote the physical assessment for Resident 1 on 8/4/23. However, the next physician visit did not occur until 48 days later after the first visit as evidenced in the physician's progress note dated, 9/21/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to demonstrate it offered or provided a shower/bath, for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1). This facility failure had the potential for Resident 1 to experience negative skin outcomes. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 8/23/23, starting at 2:00 p.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON 1) and the Health Information Manager (HIM 1), Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. The DON 1 and HIM 1 confirmed Resident 1's shower schedule was every Monday and Thursday. Resident 1's Documentation Survey Report (a form used by certified nursing assistants to document ADL care) dated 7/23, indicated on Monday 7/17/23 and Thursday 7/20/23, Resident 1 did not receive a shower or bath. The DON 1 and HIM 1 confirmed Resident 1 was at the facility on those dates and acknowledged facility documentation indicated Resident 1 did not receive a shower or bath, while at the facility. The DON 1 and HIM 1 further acknowledged there was no documentation indicating Resident 1 had refused to receive a shower or bath…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The temperature was monitored in the dry food storage room; 2. The ice machine's preventative maintenance (PMs) and cleaning schedule was performed and documented according to the manufacturer's instruction for use (MIFU's) manual; 3. The ice machine floor drain was clean, free of debris, and trash. These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/14/22, at 9:20 a.m., in the dieticians office, the office was observed to also be used as the dry food storage room. The room was divided by a caged wall. One side of the room was the office, and the other side was food storage. The food was stored on shelves. The room felt warm and not well ventilated and no thermometer was seen. During a concurrent observation and interview, on 6/15/22, at 3:30 p.m., with the dietary supervisor (DS), in the dry food storage room, it was observed there was a thermometer hanging on the wall behind the door. The thermometer was reading…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment when: 1. A wall was in a state of disrepair in room six. 2. The floor was in disrepair in room two. 3. Missing section of handrail in the north wing of the facility. 4. Ill fitting closet drawer in room five. 5. Used equipment were stored outside the building of the south wing in view of the residents, staff, and visitors. 6. A toilet seat was in disrepair and peeling paint was on the door jams in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 7. A wall behind the bathroom sink was in disrepair, a faucet knob was not in good working order, limescale buildup was on the faucet, and a vent cover was missing on the bathroom ceiling in room [ROOM NUMBER]. 8. Two rooms with torn loose wall paper, stripped down to the dry wall. These facility failures had the potential to negatively effect residents' safety and wellbeing. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/14/22, at 11:00 a.m., in room six, a section of wall,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices when: 1. Hand hygiene was not performed in the kitchen. 2. Oxygen tubing and face mask connected to a Nebulizer (breathing treatment machine) was not dated and stored in a plastic bag for one resident (Resident 78). 3. Residents' shared bathrooms (rooms 23, 24 and 25, 26) had unlabeled and uncovered resident supplies, (large basins, bedpan, and emesis basin [small container used to collect vomit]) and were stored on the floor next to the toilet. These facility failures had the potential to result in food borne illness, cross-contamination (the transfer of harmful bacteria) of resident equipment and supplies that could impact residents' health and safety. Findings: 1. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Dietary Services, dated 2/12, the P&P indicated in part, .To prevent contamination of food products and therefore prevent foodborne illness .Personal Hygiene: D. Adequate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the indwelling catheter (tube draining urine from bladder) collection bag was covered with a dignity bag (covering for collection bag), for one unsampled resident (Resident 68). This facility failure had the potential for the Resident 68 to be embarrassed and thus, affect their psychosocial well being. Finding: During an observation on 6/14/22, at 10:11 a.m., Resident 68 was observed in their room, lying in bed, with eyes closed. Resident 68's indwelling urinary catheter's collection bag was hanging below the bed. The collection bag did not have a dignity bag cover. During an interview on 6/14/22, at 10:15 a.m., the licensed nurse (LN 2) acknowledged the indwelling urinary catheter collection bag did not have a dignity bag cover. During an interview on 6/17/22, at 3:46 p.m., the director of nursing (DON) indicated, the facility does not have a policy and procedure regarding a dignity bag, but it is the facility's practice to place a dignity bag to cover on the indwelling urinary catheter collection bag.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident call light (button to press if a resident needs help or assistance) was within reach for two of 32 sampled residents (Resident 13 and Resident 102). This facility failure had the potential for the residents to not be able to call for help or assistance as needed. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/14/22, at 10:34 a.m., in Resident 13's room, Resident 13's living area was observed with a Licensed Nurse (LN 2). Resident 13's call light was observed on the floor, under the bed. LN 2 acknowledged, the call light button was on the floor. During an observation on 6/17/22, at 10:30 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] C, the call light for Resident 102 was laying on the floor. During an interview on 6/17/22, at 10:34 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] C, a Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 1) acknowledged, Resident 102's call light was on the floor. During a review of the facility's policies and procedure (P&P) titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan intervention for oxygen use was being followed for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 40). This failure had the potential to result in a decline in Resident 40's physical well being. Findings: During an observation on 06/14/2022, beginning at 10:45 a.m., in Resident 40's room, the oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters via nasal cannula (oxygen tube placed in nose). During an interview, on 06/14/2022, beginning at 10:45 a.m., with Resident 40, Resident 40 stated, It's always been at 4 liters. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 6/14/2022, at 10:48 a.m., with Licensed Nurse 1 (LN 1), Resident 40's physician order for oxygen administration, dated 9/25/2021, indicated Oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously. LN 1 confirmed, that oxygen concentrator was set at 4 liters per minute. LN 1 stated, Oh no, it needs to be changed to 2 liters. During a review of Resident 40's Care Plan for Respiratory Illness (COPD), dated 9/26/2021,the Care Plan indicated in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement Physician's orders for weekly weights and notify the Physician of significant weight loss, for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 4). This failure had the potential to cause Resident 4 a further decline in health status. Findings: Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 7th Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing, page 419 in the section titled, Legal Implications in Nursing Practice indicates, Nurses are obligated to follow physician order unless they believe they orders are in error or would harm clients. Review of [NAME] and [NAME], 7th Edition, Mosby's Fundamentals of Nursing, page 243 in the section titled, Data Documentation indicates, Observation and recording of client status is a legal and professional responsibility. The nurse practice acts in all states and the American Nurses Association Nursing's Social Policy Statement (2003) mandate, or require, accurate data collection and recording as independent functions essential to the role of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted nurse staffing information was current. This facility failure had the potential for residents and visitors to not to be aware of the actual nursing hours the facility is providing. Findings: During an observation of the facility's lobby on 6/15/22, at 10:35 a.m., the posted nurse staffing was dated 6/14/22. During an interview on 6/15/22, at 10:38 a.m., the director of nursing (DON) acknowledged the posted nurse staffing was not current. During an interview on 6/17/22 at 3:15 p.m., the DON indicated, the facility does not have a policy regarding posting of nurse staffing. The facility follows the federal regulation for nurse staffing postings.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a physician's reason of no action/no change on the pharmacist's recommendation for Cymbalta (medication used to treat depression and anxiety) was documented in the resident's medical record in one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 105). This failure had the potential for over medication and /or ineffective medication administration. Findings: During a concurrent record review, and interview, on 6/17/22, at 2:59 p.m., with the director of nursing (DON 1), Resident 105's Consultation Report (a form used by pharmacists to make drug recommendations to physicians) was reviewed. The Consultation Report, dated 2/14/22, indicated in part, Resident 105 was taking Cymbalta 30 mg QD (every day) for depression. The report further indicated A GDR (gradual dose reduction) should be attempted in 2 separate quarters, with at least 1 month between attempts, within the first year in which an individual is admitted on a psychotropic medication or after the facility has initiated such medication, and then annually unless clinically…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 58's) Lorazepam (medication used for anxiety) ordered as needed (PRN) did not exceed 14 days of therapy unless renewed. This facility failure had the potential for Resident 58 to be over medicated or have no assessment for renewal use. Findings: During a review of the health record for Resident 58's on 6/16/22, at 12:12 p.m., the health record indicated orders for: 1. Lorazepam 0.5mg by mouth twice a day as needed for anxiety for 90 days, ordered on 2/15/22 2. Lorazepam 0.5mg by mouth twice a day as needed for anxiety for 120 days ordered on 5/25/22. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 6/16/22 at 12:41 p.m., with the nurse supervisor (RNSUP), Resident 58's health record was reviewed. Resident 58's pharmacy recommendation indicated, on 1/18/22 the pharmacist commented on Lorazepam as PRN (as necessary) order for anxiolytic, which has been greater for 14 days without a stop date. Pharmacy recommendation - please discontinue prn Lorazepam, tapering as necessary, if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have a standardized recipe for tuna salad, and no system in place to acknowledge food allergies. This facility failure had the potential to negatively impact the health and safety of residents with known food allergies. Findings: A review of the facility policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Resident Food Preferences, dated 2/09, indicated in part, .The food and dining services staff will avoid serving products that contribute to food allergies and make every attempt to meet the resident's food preferences. During an observation on 6/14/22, at 8:55 a.m., during a tour of the kitchen, in the walk- in refrigerator, a container of tuna salad was observed. The tuna salad container indicated it was made on 6/13/22 and use by date was 6/18/22. During an interview on 6/15/22, at 2:07 p.m., with the cook (Cook 2), [NAME] 2 was asked how tuna salad was made. [NAME] 2 verbalized, the tuna comes from a can that is taken from dry storage. [NAME] 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-17 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's prescribed therapeutic diet order for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 78) during lunch on 6/16/22. This failure resulted in Resident 78 receiving the wrong prescribed lunch meal and had the potential to result in decreased food intake or unplanned weight loss, further compromising the nutritional and medical status of Resident 78. Findings: During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Therapeutic Diets, dated 2/09, the P&P indicated in part .Ensure therapeutic diets are written and available as ordered .therapeutic diets (also known as special diets) and mechanically-altered diets are ordered by the physician and planned by a registered dietician .the facility prepares and serves all special diets as planned. During an interview on 6/14/22, at 10:38 a.m., with Resident 78, Resident 78 stated, Food portions have become smaller. I am still hungry at the end of meals. Resident 78 verbalized, the food portion sizes I am receiving are small and stated, I call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-a care directive during life threatening situations) were reflected as signed and ordered by the attending physician on the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) for one of 32 sampled residents (Resident 28). This failure had the potential to cause a delay or violate resident's rights as to wishes on administering life-sustaining treatments during an emergency. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review, on [DATE], at 10:51 a.m., with the minimum data set nurse (MDS 1) Resident 28's POLST, dated [DATE], was reviewed. Resident 28's POLST indicated .Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR), provide Comfort-Focused Treatment- relieve pain and suffering with medication, use oxygen, suctioning, and manual treatment of airway obstruction, and No artificial means nutrition, including feeding tubes. Resident 28's Physician Orders (PO) in the EMR, with the run date of [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$28,248 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $28,248 — penalty dated 2025-01-16
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COVENANT CARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.5 | -0.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 2.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 4.4 | -2.4 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVENANT CARE CALIFORNIA, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT CARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| CENTRE CAPITAL INVESTORS V, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (B), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (Q), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (S), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND, L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT SUBCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| STATE TREASURER OF MICH CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPL RTMNT SYSTEMS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| STOCKWELL FUND II LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| EVANS, MARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| LEVIN, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| SIMS, CHRISTINE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| TOROK, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 02/20/2014 |
| ASHLEY, DAVA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/26/2018 |
| CARNEY, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2013 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/17/2018 |
| SPARKS, CAROL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/01/2008 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555163. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.