La Jolla Post-Acute
2552 Torrey Pines Rd, La Jolla, CA 92037 · For profit - Corporation · 161 certified beds · (858) 453-5810 Medicare & Medicaid certified
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 6.5% | 7.3% | 6.5% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 6.3% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.8% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.3% | 11.2% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.65 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.22 | 1.57 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
43.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 127 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 43.5%CMS range 35.8–49.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.8%CMS range 7.8–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 67.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 96.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 91.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.7–9.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 161 beds and averages 141.6 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.54 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.01 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 33 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the dumpster area was clean and the dumpster lid was closed. This had the potential to affect all 140 residents who resided in the facility. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Environmental Maintenance - Grounds Maintenance effective 08/2014, indicated Purpose To define the procedure for inspecting the grounds and performing corrective maintenance as needed. The policy specified, 5. Visually inspect dumpster areas for any unsafe or unsanitary conditions. 6. Visually inspect for trash, debris, pests or rodents. During an observation of the dumpster on 04/21/2025 at 8:51 AM, the surveyor noted the dumpster was opened and there were disposable gloves, aluminum foil, and food packaging on the ground. During an observation of the dumpster on 04/22/2025 at 8:52 AM, the surveyor noted the dumpster was full, the dumpster lid was opened and could not close due to overflowing bags, and empty boxes were on the ground around the dumpster. During a concurrent interview and observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 10 (Residents #7, #21, #24, #27, #44, #55, #83, #94, #102, and #130) of 11 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Standard of Practice, dated 01/2024, revealed, MDSs are transmitted within the timeframe's set forth in the CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid] RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] MDS 3.0 Manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2024, revealed The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. The manual specified, The MDS completion date must be no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 1 (Resident #33) of 11 sampled residents reviewed for resident assessment. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Standard of Practice, dated 01/2024, revealed, MDSs are transmitted within the timeframes set forth in the CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid] RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] MDS 3.0 Manual. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated 10/2024, revealed The Annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) unless an SCSA [Significant Change in Status Assessment] or an SCPA [Significant Correction to Prior Comprehensive Assessment] has been completed since the most recent comprehensive assessment was completed. Its completion dates depend on the most recent comprehensive and past assessments' ARDs [Assessment Reference Date] and completion dates. *…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) for 2 residents (Resident #55 and Resident #71) of 27 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, MDS Standard of Practice, dated 01/2024, revealed, It is the practice of this facility to conduct accurate coding and delivery of services provided to capture accurate assessment of each resident's functional capacity and health status as per CMS [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid] RAI [Resident Assessment Instrument] MDS 3.0 Manual guidelines. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #55 on 12/14/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and anxiety disorder. An annual MDS, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/07/2024, revealed Resident #55 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated Resident #55 was not currently…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a Level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) was timely resubmitted after a resident remained in the facility longer than 30 days for 2 (Resident #120) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. The facility further failed to ensure the accuracy of the Level I PASRR for 1 (Resident #108) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Admission, Transfer, Discharge and Bed-Holds dated 12/2016, revealed, The facility, in compliance with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987, requires individuals diagnosed with major mental illness, mental retardation, or developmental disabilities to be screened prior to admission and throughout stay in accordance with PASRR requirements. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #120 on 02/04/2025. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, major depressive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly dispose of medication for 1 (Resident #71) of 27 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Disposal of Medications and Medication-Related Supplies, updated 08/2019, indicated, Discontinued medications and medications left in the facility after a resident's discharge are destroyed. Destruction methods comply with federal and state laws and regulations, including the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) guidelines for medication destruction. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #71 on 04/07/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of overactive bladder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/08/2025, revealed Resident #71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #71's Order Summary Report that contained active orders as of 04/22/2025, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not left at the bedside of 2 (Resident #55 and Resident #71) of 27 sampled residents Findings included: A facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, updated 08/2019, indicated, Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. 1. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #71 on 04/07/2021. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses protein-calorie malnutrition and disorders of bone density and structure. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/08/2025, revealed Resident #71 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. Resident #71's Care Plan Report with an admission date of 04/07/2021, revealed no care plan to indicate the resident could self-administer their medications. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure POLST (Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment- a medical order that outlines a patient's preferences for end-of-life care) was correctly documented into Resident 1's medical record. As a result, Resident 1's POLST signed by the physician to a full code status was changed to a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive the full medical treatment in the event of a medical emergency. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included multiple fractures of the pelvis (break of the ring of bones that connect your spine to the hips), per the facility's admission Record Form. On [DATE], an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted related to an alleged complaint that the facility changed the order of the resident's wishes listed in the POLST form from a full resuscitation to do not resuscitate , in case of medical emergency. A review of Resident 1's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of six residents' (Resident 1, 2, and 3) medications were stored securely when: -Resident 1's medications were observed at the resident's bedside. -Resident 2 and 3 reported their medications were left at their bedsides. These failures had the potential for residents to receive the wrong medication and/or incorrect dosage which may cause clinically significant adverse consequences. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 2's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 4/16/24 at 3:26 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated her morning thyroid medication was often left at her bedside around 5 A.M., to take later when she woke up. On 4/17/24 at 10:27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents' (Resident 3) routine medication was available to be administered to the resident. As a result, Resident 3 was not consistently administered her daily thyroid medication. Findings: A review of Resident 3's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hypothyroidism (low thyroid hormones). A review of Resident 3's physician order dated 10/2/23, indicated the resident was to receive levothyroxine (thyroid medication) 125 micrograms, two tablets daily, that was scheduled to be given at 6:30 A.M. On 4/16/24 at 3:26 P.M., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 stated, The pharmacy here's not good, refills and deliveries don't get done. Resident 3 stated during the first week of April (2024) there were four days she did not receive her levothyroxine. Resident 3 stated when she asked about the availability of her levothyroxine, the licensed nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 33 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supply a physician prescribed condom catheter (an external apparatus that fits on the outside of the penis and drains urine into an external bag) for one of one resident (Resident 1). As a result, the facility placed an indwelling catheter (sterile flexible tube placed inside the penis, to drain urine from the bladder into an external bag). When the indwelling urinary catheter was removed, Resident 1 experienced pain, bleeding, and verbalized fear of possible future indwelling urinary catheter placements. Findings: An unannounced visit was made to the facility on [DATE], in response to a complaint which involved an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of quadriplegia (inability to move arms/legs with paralysis from the neck down, per the facility ' s admission Record. On [DATE] an interview was conducted with Resident 1, in his room. Resident 1 stated he no longer had anyone to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were competent upon hire for Licensed Nursing (LN) skills, such as the insertion of a urinary catheter for one of one staff reviewed (LN 1) for nursing competency. As a result, an indwelling urinary catheter (a sterile flexible tube placed inside the penis, to drain urine from the bladder into an external bag), was improperly inserted into Resident 1, resulting in bleeding when the catheter was removed the following day. (Cross reference F-684 Findings: An unannounced visit was made to the facility on 3/14/24, in response to a complaint received by California Department of Public Health involving the insertion of an indwelling urinary catheter. On 3/14/24 at 12:05 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Director of Staff Development (DSD). The DSD stated she started working at the facility on 3/31/22. The DSD reviewed all the past in-services and stated she could not find any documented evidence urinary catheters care training was provided to LNs, reviewing in-service documents back to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow infection control standards of practices when: 1. The Treatment nurse 1 (Tx LN 1) did not disinfect hands after removing gloves three out of six times while providing wound care for Resident 6. 2. Tx LN 1 did not disinfect scissors for two of two wound dressing changes for Resident 6. 3. One of three common resident shower rooms (shower between Station 1 and Station 2) was not cleaned after use. 4. Oxygen tubing was undated and was in contact with the floor for one of one resident (Resident 7). 5. A breathing treatment mouthpiece was exposed to the environment while lying on a tabletop for one of one resident (Resident 7). As a result, there was the potential for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings: 1. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, per the facility ' s admission Record. On 12/29/23 at 10:42 A.M., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor and document a low air loss (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat skin issues) mattress, for prevention of skin injuries as ordered by the physician and listed as an intervention in the care plans for three of three residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3), reviewed for plan of care in order to maintain skin integrity. As a result, Residents 1, 2, and 3 had the potential for worsening skin injuries. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease (a low, progressive circulation disorder), and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels), per the facility's admission Record. On 9/12/23 at 10:18 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was lying in bed on a LAL mattress with green padded-protection boots on both feet and both ankles were propped up on a pillow. Resident 1 stated she was not doing well today and had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide wound treatments as ordered by the physician for two of three residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) reviewed for Quality of Care. As a result, Residents 1 and 3 had the potential for delayed healing and worsening of wounds. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included peripheral vascular disease (a low, progressive circulation disorder), and diabetes (abnormal blood sugar levels), per the facility's admission Record. On 9/12/23 at 10:18 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was lying in bed on a LAL mattress (low air loss-a mattress designed to prevent skin injuries), with green padded-protection boots on both feet and both ankles. Resident 1's legs were propped up on a pillow. Resident 1 stated she was not doing well today and had, necrotic feet (dying tissue in her feet). On 9/12/23, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement their infection control program when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 41 did not perform hand hygiene in between residents. 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 41 did not clean and disinfect the Blood Pressure (BP) cuff in between resident use. 3. Laundry Staff (LS) 41 and LS 42 did not follow hand hygiene and gloving policy during collection of soiled linens. 4. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 42 did not wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in a Clostridium Difficile (C-Diff - a spore forming bacterium causing intestinal inflammation and infectious diarrhea. C- Diff infection can spread from person to person on a contaminated equipment and by contaminated hands of healthcare workers) isolation room and did not perform handwashing after contact with Resident # 265's environment. These failures had the potential for cross contamination and spread of infection to residents, resident family and visitors and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure policy and procedures to access resident records included verbal requests for one of twenty-three residents, Resident 15. This failure has the potential for Resident 15 to not have access to her records. Findings: During an initial tour observation on 4/5/22, Resident 15 produced a written request for a medical records release of information for herself for her belonging sheet. Resident 15 stated she had lost some clothing items and wanted them replaced. Resident 15 stated she was told by the facility staff to request her belongings sheet (her record of personal belongings) by completing a record request in writing. Resident 15 stated she should not have had to do that (request in writing). On 4/5/22 at 4:04 P.M., the Social Services Director stated the process for residents to see their own medical record involved the facility needing to have a written medical record release. On 4/6/22 at 8 A.M., the Medical Records Director (MRD) was interviewed. The MRD stated that it was company's policy that any request by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's confidential medical information for one of 23 sampled residents (80). This failure had the potential for residents' confidential medical information to be visible to unauthorized people. Findings: Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar in the body) per the facility's admission record. During the initial tour of the facility on 4/5/21, Resident 80's profile and list of medications were visible on the nurse station's computer to others. There were residents sitting across the nurse station and staff walking past the nurse station. On 4/5/22 at 10:46 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 1. LN 1 stated she should have logged off the computer because of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA, a federal law that protect sensitive health information). On 4/5/22 at 11:55 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 2. LN 2 stated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of 23 sampled residents (15). This failure had the potential to not meet the goals of the treatment and the needs of Resident 15. Findings: Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included aphasia following cerebral infarction (language disorder caused by brain damage) per facility's admission Record. Per Resident 15's Dietary profile, dated 10/8/21, indicated Resident 15's diet preference was vegetarian (plant based diet). Per Resident 15's Care plan titled, Altered nutrition and hydration risk ., revision date 11/15/21, indicated the intervention was to honor food and fluid preferences. No vegetarian preference was included in this care plan. On 4/8/22 at 12:58 P.M., an interview with the Registered Dietitian (RD) was conducted. The RD stated she would have included the vegetarian preference in Resident 15's care plan. She further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician's dialysis (a treatment for people whose kidneys are failing) order for fluid restriction for one of two sampled residents (63). This failure had the potential for Resident 63 to have fluid overload (a condition of having more fluids than what a dialysis patient can tolerate). Findings: Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease (A disease that makes the kidneys unable to clean the blood of toxins and excrete excess fluids), Retention of Urine (Unable to completely empty the bladder of urine), and Dependence on Renal Dialysis per the facility's Resident Face Sheet. Per Resident 63's Order Listing Report, dated 3/10/22, the physician wrote an order for fluid restriction of 1500 ml.(milliliters)/day. (1,500 ml. = 6.34 cups). On 4/7/22 at 3:13 P.M., a concurrent interview and record review of Resident 63's medical record was conducted with the Director of Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to communicate with hospice (end of life) services provided for two of 23 sampled residents (27,80). This failure had the potential to prevent residents from receiving coordinated hospice care. Findings: A. Resident 27 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease(COPD, lung disease), Asthma (a condition in which your airways narrow and swell and may produce extra mucus), Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen (dependence on extra oxygen use), Cerebral Atherscleroisis(a disease of the arteries characterized by the deposition of plaques of fatty material on their inner wall in arteries of the brain), and Malnutrition (A condition caused by not getting enough calories or the right amount of key nutrients, such as vitamins and minerals, that are needed for health). A record review conducted on 4/12/22 of Resident 27's physician's orders, dated 11/22/2020, read Admit to the hospice, dx: Cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow up on an optometrist appointment for one of one sampled resident (80). As a result, Resident 80 wore broken eyeglasses since admission to the facility. Findings: Resident 80 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes (abnormal blood sugar in the body) per the facility's admission record. During the initial tour of the facility on 4/5/22, Resident 80 was observed wearing eyeglasses with a white piece of tape in the middle holding the frames together. Resident 80's clinical record was reviewed. On 12/7/21 at 16:46 (4:46 P.M.) social services documented, Will fax referral to an eye MD (Medical Doctor). There was no other documentation found about any follow up done in Resident 80's clinical record. On 4/6/22 at 2:03 P.M., Resident 80 was observed in the dining room playing cards. Resident 80 was observed placing the card directly in front of his eyeglasses staring at the card, then placed it down on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance device to 1 of 23 residents (Resident 28) when a grab bar (a safety assistive device to hold in the bathroom) was not provided in Resident 28's bathroom for safety. This failure had the potential for Resident 28 to have accident and fall that could lead to injury. FINDINGS: Resident 28 was admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses that include pain in left hip, shortness of breath, hypotension (a low or a fall in blood pressure) per undated Facesheet. On 4/7/2022 at 9:41 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 28. Resident 28 was seated on the wheelchair and was using a nasal cannula connected to an oxygen concentrator. Resident 28 stated that he was handicapped and moved around the facility using the wheelchair. Resident 28 stated that he transferred from wheelchair to the toilet seat with assistance from staff. Resident 28 stated that his bathroom did not have a grab bar. Resident 28 stated that without a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an oxygen nasal cannula (device used to deliver oxygen to a person) was changed per the facility's oxygen policy on seven of 23 sampled residents 5,14,27,28,41,60, 64) reviewed for oxygen use. This failure had the potential for residents to be placed at risk for infection. Findings: A. Resident 60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a breathing and lung disease) and hypoxemia (low oxygen in the blood) per the facility's admission Record. On 4/7/22 at 8:08 A.M., Resident 60 was observed eating breakfast in bed. Resident 60 was wearing a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator machine. The oxygen nasal cannula did not have a date or label. On 4/7/22 at 8:22 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 5. LN 5 stated oxygen tubing were usually changed either weekly or monthly. LN 5 stated it was important to put the date it was changed so staff would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to post their actual staffing hours when the facility only posted anticipated staffing for the day. As a result, the staffing information may not have been accurate. Findings: The facility provided daily staffing information titled, Today's Staffing, from 4/1/22 to 4/7/22. The facility provided a single sheet for each day, which included the patient census, the number of Registered Nurse (RN), the number of Licensed Nurse (LN), and the number of Assistants/Techs. These numbers were broken down to hours and full time employees (FTE). On 4/8/22 at 8:20 A.M., a concurrent interview and record review of the document titled Today's Staffing was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The projected Per Patient Day (PPD-staffing ratio) value was 4.18 versus the actual PPD value was 3.58. The ADM said these numbers were the projected staffing for the day, and not the actual staffing for the day. The actual staffing information was not going to be available for several days and was provided by the Payroll Department. The Admin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the monthly MRR was completed, and the pharmacist recommendations were acted upon monthly. This failure had the potential for medications to be continued unnecessarily. Findings: On 4/7/22, the DON presented the team with the MRR binder. The MRR binder contained all the MRR for a year, except it was missing November, December 2021, January, and February 2022. The DON was unable to produce any of the pharmacist recommendations for those four months. The March 2022 MRRs included a pharmacist recommendation dated 1/12/22, the recommendation was to reduce a trazadone dose with the end goal of discontinuing it. This recommendation was not acted upon by the Physician until 3/21/22. A pharmacist recommendation dated 2/9/22, recommending a gradual dose reduction was not acted upon by the physician until 3/21/22. A pharmacist recommendation dated 2/10/22, to discontinue PRN lorazepam was not acted upon by the physician until 3/21/22. The DON was interviewed on 4/7/22 at 1:30 P.M. The DON stated she had the email version of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate indication for a psychotropic medication (A drug that affects emotions, mental processes, and behavior) for one of five sampled residents (27). This failure put Resident 27 at risk for receiving unnecessary medication. Findings: Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Unspecified Dementia without Behavioral Disturbance (A decline in mental ability that affects daily living), per the facility's admission Record. On 4/8/22 at 9:54 A.M., a medical record review of Resident 27 was conducted. A behavior summary dated 2/27/22, indicated Resident 27 was given Risperidone (A medication for treating mental disorders) 1 mg. (milligram) at bedtime. This medication was ordered on 1/16/22. The behavior summary on January and February 2022, indicated a total number of behavior and/or mood episodes were none. On 4/8/22 at 10:32 A.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure; 1. The disposal of two opened vials of antibiotics (medication to treat infection) per facility policy and, 2. Medication storage room was locked. These failures had the potential for all residents to receive ineffective medications and access by unauthorized personnel to medications. Findings: A medication cart inspection was conducted on [DATE] with the DON in Station 1. In the first drawer of the intravenous (IV [medication through the vein]) medication cart were 2 vials of unsealed medications with a white powdery substance inside. One vial was labeled, Meropenem (antibiotic) 1 gm (gram)/vial and the other was Vancomycin (antibiotic) 1 gm. On [DATE] at 4 P.M., an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that unsealed vials of medications should not be stored in the IV cart. The DON stated the nurse should waste the medication in the incinerator bin inside the medication room if not used. On [DATE] at 4:05 P.M., a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed when: 1. Consistent Carbohydrate (CCHO) diets were not followed for two of two residents (15,51). 2. Large portion diets were not followed for three of three residents (52,53, 54). These failures had the potential for 112 residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen to not meet their nutritional needs. Findings: 1. On 4/5/22 at 12:08 P.M., an observation of the noon meal in the assisted dining room was conducted. Resident 15's meal ticket read regular CCHO. The lunch meal included one cup of spaghetti noodles, half a cup of seasoned cabbage, small cup of cottage cheese. Unsampled resident 51's meal ticket read Regular CCHO fortified. The lunch meal included 3 ounces of spaghetti with meat sauce, half a cup of seasoned cabbage, and one garlic wheat roll. A review of the facility document titled Diet Spreadsheet X-format (a spreadsheet with portion sizes for all foods and diets) dated 4/5/22, showed CCHO diets should have received a full size chocolate chip cookie. On 4/5/22…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' food preferences were followed for 3 of 23 final sampled residents (7, 11, 15). This failure caused the resident to not receive food they preferred. Findings: Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition) per the admission Record. On 4/5/22 at 12:10 P.M., Resident 7 received her lunch of spaghetti with meat sauce. Residents 7's meal ticket indicated her dislikes were ground meats. Resident 7 stated she would have preferred to have spaghetti sauce without meat in it. Resident 7 said she requested spaghetti sauce with no meat in the past, and was told by dietary they only served one type of meal for everyone, and they couldn't make meatless spaghetti sauce. Resident 7 stated she would rather not eat anything than eat the spaghetti with meat sauce. The dietitian was interviewed on 4/8/22 at P.M., the dietitian stated she was unclear if Resident 7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitary requirements were followed in the kitchen: a. The inside of the ice machine was not clean, and manufacturer's instructions were not followed for the ice machine cleaning and sanitizing b. A cutting board surface was heavily marred. c. Brooms and mop were stored on the floor. d. The inside of the dining bowls was not clean. e. The ice machine and three compartment sink drain did not have an air gap. f. Kitchen equipment were not air dried. These deficient practices had the potential to cause food borne illnesses for 112 residents. Findings: a. On 4/5/22 at 10:04 A.M., the following observations were made with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS): - A yellow discoloration with roughness was felt on the ice machine's white evaporator cover. - A white residue was observed on the metal splash guard. - Multiple black residues were observed on the corner of the water drip tray. When the water drip tray was wiped with white paper towel, the black residue came off onto the paper towel. On 4/5/22 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that two of 23 sampled residents (7, 48) had a completed POLST in their clinical record. The failure had the potential the residents end of life wishes may not have accurately been followed in an emergency. Findings: On 4/5/22, the clinical record of Resident 7 was reviewed. Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. There was no POLST found in the residence clinical record. On 4/8/22, the DON produced a POLST for Resident 7 dated 4/7/22. This POLST was not signed by the physician. The DON had no explanation for the delay. On 4/5/22, the clinical record of resident 48 was reviewed. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. Resident 48 had a POLST that was signed by the resident and dated 3/17/20, this POLST was never signed by the physician. On 4/8/22 at 1:30 P.M., the DON stated Resident 48's POLST had no physician's signature and had no explanation.
- Potential for harm · E2019-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (a process to remove waste from the blood for residents with kidney disease) assessments were consistently and accurately completed for four of four sampled dialysis residents (97, 32, 39, 64). These failures had the potential for miscommunication between the facility and dialysis center and to affect the continuity and quality of care of these residents. Findings: 1. Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included end stage renal disease (kidney failure) and dependence on renal dialysis, per the facility's admission Record. According to Resident 97's MDS, dated [DATE], the resident had a brief interview for mental status score of 15 (on a scale of 0 to 15, with 15 being the most cognitively intact). According to Resident 97's physician's orders, dated 9/7/17, the resident went to dialysis every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. These orders also indicated the resident's dialysis access site…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement their infection control program when the ice scoop was not stored in a sanitary manner. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of infection and illness to residents in the facility. Findings: On 8/8/19 at 12:24 P.M., RD 1 was concurrently interviewed as a brief inspection of the ice machine was observed. The scoop to dispense the ice was observed to be lying on top of the ice in the bin. RD 1 stated to avoid contamination, the ice scoop should have been stored in a sanitary manner outside the bin of the ice machine. During an interview with CNA 4 on 8/9/19 at 10:03 A.M., CNA 4 stated they filled up an ice chest for the nursing station from the ice machine using a scoop. CNA 4 stated the scoop had a storage area on the wall next to the ice machine. CNA 4 stated the scoop should not be left in the ice bin. During an interview with the ICN on 8/9/19 at 11:40 A.M., the ICN stated when getting ice from the ice machine, the staff needed to ensure the handle of the scoop did not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess one of 29 sampled residents (52), for safe self-administration of medication. This failure had the potential to put Resident 52 at risk for improper medication administration, and did not ensure safe storage of the self-administered medication. Findings: Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), generalized muscle weakness, and essential tremor (shaking), per the facility's admission Record. On 8/6/19 at 10:50 A.M., Resident 52 was observed sitting up in bed with oxygen (O2) on at three liters per minute by nasal cannula (a flexible tubing that rests in the nostrils to deliver O2), on the resident's bedside table sat a nebulizer (a machine that administers medication in a mist form to the lungs). During an interview, Resident 52 stated she did her own breathing treatments. Resident 52 picked up a plastic ampule (sealed container containing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Notify the physician of a high blood sugar reading for one of 14 sampled residents (39) receiving insulin (a medication to control high blood sugar); and, 2. Ensure three of six sampled residents (36, 49, 1) with identified nutritional concerns and weight loss were monitored with weekly weights as indicated by their care plans. As a result, Resident 39 may not have received treatment for high blood sugar, and there was the potential for Resident's 36, 49, and Resident 1 to be at risk of further weight loss. Findings: 1. Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes (unstable blood sugar). A review was conducted of Resident 39's EMR. Resident 39 had an order to check her blood sugar at bed time, and to notify the physician if the blood sugar reading was greater than 400. Resident 39's blood sugar reading was 495 on 7/28/19 and 425 on 8/4/19 . There…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident's care plan was revised after falls for one of 29 sampled residents (16). This failure had the potential to put Resident 16 at increased risk for further falls or injury. Findings: Resident 16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included dementia (a loss of mental abilities that leads to impairments in memory, reasoning, planning, and behaviors), and repeated falls, per the facility's admission Record. According to a review of Resident 16's medical record, the resident had witnessed falls on six separate occasions between 1/16 and 6/17/19. A review of Resident 16's Care Plan titled, At Risk for Falls and Injuries, indicated the last revision of the care plan was on 9/21/18. During an interview with LN 2 on 8/9/19 at 1:20 P.M., LN 2 stated resident care plans needed to be updated with new interventions after a resident had a fall. During an interview with LN 8 on 8/9/19 at 1:22 P.M., LN 8 stated the IDT reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional recommendations by the registered dietician were not implemented for one of six sampled residents (1) with identified nutritional concerns and weight loss. This failure had the potential to contribute to further weight loss for the resident. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included dementia (a loss of mental abilities that leads to impairments in memory, reasoning, planning, and behavior), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing), gastrostomy (surgical placement of a tube in the stomach), and failure to thrive (a state of decline which may be caused by chronic diseases and functional impairments), per the facility's admission Record. According to Resident 1's Physician Progress Notes, dated 3/29/19, the resident has been dependent on gastrostomy tube (g-tube) for nutritional needs since 2017. Resident 1 was observed in bed, with Glucerna 1.5 infusing at 55 cubic centimeters…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (308) with a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line- to provide access to a large vein for administration of medication for long-term use), was monitored per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to affect Resident 308's care and delay the identification of catheter-related complications. Findings: Resident 308 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, which included methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus infection (MRSA- bacteria not killed by some common antibiotics), and urinary tract infection (UTI), per the facility's admission Record. On 8/6/19 at 11 A.M., a PICC line was observed in Resident 308's left upper arm. A dressing was secured over the insertion site and dated 8/2/19. According to Resident 308's physician's orders, dated 7/21/19, the resident's catheter site dressing was to be changed every week and as needed for complications. In addition, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent. Thirteen medication errors out of 28 opportunities were identified during medication administration, when nursing: 1. Administered nine crushed medications via PEG (Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube - a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) at the same time to Resident 87. 2. Omitted one medication for Resident 87. 3. Administered the incorrect form of a medication to Resident 87. 4. Administered the incorrect form of a medication to Resident 74. 5. Omitted one oral medication for Resident 38. 6. Omitted one topical medication for Resident 38. This failure resulted in the medication error rate of 46.43%. Findings: 1. On 8/8/19 at 7:42 A.M., an observation of medication administration was conducted with LN 18. LN 18 placed nine medications in one medicine cup, transferred to a small plastic bag, then crushed all nine medications together in a pill…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure; 1. Medications were stored properly. 2. Expired biological's were discarded in two of four medication carts and, 3. Medication Refrigerator temperatures were monitored for two of two medication refrigerators. This failure had the potential for unsafe storage and administration of resident medication. Findings: 1. On 8/8/19 at 3:38 P.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with LN 20. LN 20 stated the medication cart she had was labeled as Medication cart 1. The suppositories and nebulizer (breathing medication) medications were stored in the same drawer with oral medication. LN 20 stated the suppositories and the nebulizer should have been kept in separate drawers. LN 20 stated the medications should have been placed where they belonged so they were not administered via the wrong route. In addition, one hydrocortisone cream 1 % (used to treat a variety of skin conditions), and one topical ketoprofen 10% cream (pain-killing topical) were stored in the same drawer with the oral medications.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food production was implemented in a manner that mitigated the risk for food borne illness by the lack of an air gap in the food preparation (prep) sink. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for food borne illnesses, which could have resulted in gastrointestinal distress and weight loss. Findings: During a general observation in the kitchen on 8/8/19 at 9:39 A.M., the two compartment food prep sink was plumbed directly to the wastewater system. On 8/8/19 at 9:40 A.M., RD 1 stated the food prep sink should have had an air gap to prevent any back flow of water into the sink where food was washed. On 8/8/19 at 11:12 A.M., kitchen staff were observed washing cucumbers in the food prep sink. On 8/8/19 at 12:30 P.M., the MS was concurrently interviewed while the pipe under the food prep sink in the kitchen was observed. The MS stated it looked like there was no device on the plumbing to prevent back flow into the food prep sink. The standard of practice in the food industry would be to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-08-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hospice documentation and the hospice plan of care were up to date for one of three sampled residents on hospice services (12). As a result, the facility did not have a record of the current care the hospice agency was providing to the resident. Findings: Per the facility's admission Record, Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dementia (a progressive mental and physical decline). On 8/8/19, a review was conducted of Resident 12's hospice binder. Resident 12 was admitted to the hospice agency on 8/26/17 with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental and physical decline). The most recent documentation of a nursing visit was on 6/22/19 (six weeks and five days prior). The most recent Plan of Care was dated 9/24/18 (10 months and 15 days prior). On 8/8/19 at 10:38 A.M., an interview was conducted with LN 8. LN 8 stated, all hospice documentation was kept in the hospice binder. On 8/8/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to COVENANT CARE — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 2.8 | +1.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 4 of 5 | 2.5 | +1.5 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COVENANT CARE CALIFORNIA, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE CAPITAL INVESTORS V, LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (B), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (Q), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| CENTRE COVENANT PURCHASER (S), LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| CENTRE V SECONDARY FUND, L.P. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT CARE, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| COVENANT SUBCO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| STATE TREASURER OF MICH CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPL RTMNT SYSTEMS | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 12/19/2008 |
| STOCKWELL FUND II LP | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| EVANS, MARY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| LEVIN, ROBERT | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| SIMS, CHRISTINE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/14/2006 |
| TOROK, ANDREW | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 07/17/2008 |
| MIDCAP FUNDING IV TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 02/20/2014 |
| ASHLEY, DAVA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/26/2018 |
| CARNEY, KEVIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/01/2013 |
| HASSELL, LANCE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 05/17/2018 |
| SPARKS, CAROL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2005 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 056017. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.