Terrace View Care Center
201 East Bastanchury, Fullerton, CA 92835 · For profit - Corporation · 59 certified beds · (714) 870-0060 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (58) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.2% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.2% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.1% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.7% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 8.0% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.6% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.1% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.7% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
70.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 431 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 79.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 176 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 70.5%CMS range 65.5–74.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 6.6–11.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 79.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 82.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 82.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 4.6–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.86 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
58 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure proper medication storage for one of one medication carts (Medication Cart A) and one of two medication rooms (Medication Room A). * The facility failed to ensure inhalation solution vials were stored in the foil pouch, and labeled with opened date in Medication Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure an oral alendronate (bisphosphonates, prevent bone breakdown and increase bone density) medication was not stored with cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion (immunomodulators, works by decreasing swelling in the eye to allow for tear production) eyedrops and glucometer control solutions in Medication Cart A. * The facility failed to ensure a bottle of Tubersol (tuberculin purified protein derivative) and latanoprost eyedrops (prostaglandin analogs, lowers pressure in the eye by increasing the flow from the eye) were labeled with opened date in Medication Room A. * The facility failed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices were implemented as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure a visitor for Resident 61 who was on C-Diff isolation was educated on isolation precautions like handwashing instead of using ABHR and wearing gloves. * The facility failed to ensure the housekeeper wore a protective gown when sorting soiled linens. * The facility failed to ensure the employee's personal belongings were not stored with the clean blankets and tablecloths used by the residents in the clean linen area. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 43's urinal filled with urine was not placed near the resident's cupcake. These failures had the potential for spreading infection.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Section: Infection Control, Subject: Standard and Transmission Based Precautions dated 6/2024 under the Policy Implementation section, showed the following: a. Standard Precautions are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-02-23 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' bed inspection and entrapment assessments were conducted and the measurements were recorded during the bed inspection when identifying areas of possible entrapment with the use of side rails for three of four final sampled residents (Residents 4, 21, and 43) and one non-sampled resident (Resident 61) reviewed for the use of side rails. * The facility failed to ensure a bed inspection was completed for Resident 21 who was on bariatric bed. * The facility failed to ensure an entrapment assessment was accurately conducted for Resident 4 who had bilateral 1/2 side rails. * The facility failed to ensure an entrapment assessment was accurately conducted for Resident 43 who had bilateral 1/2 side rails. * The facility failed to ensure a bed inspection was completed for Resident 61 who was on bariatric bed. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled resident (Resident 43) reviewed for the side rail use remained free from the accident hazards associated with the use of the elevated side rails. * The facility failed to obtain informed consent for the use of the bilateral upper side rails for Resident 43. This failure had the potential for the resident to be unaware of the risks associated with the use of the bilateral upper side rails and risk for serious injury to the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Bed Safety and Bed Rails date revised 8/2025 showed the use of bed rails or side rails (including temporarily raising the side rails for episodic use during care) is prohibited unless the criteria for use of bed rails have been met, including attempts to use alternatives, interdisciplinary evaluation, resident assessment, and informed consent. Before using bed rails for any reason, the staff shall inform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to determine whether it was safe for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 21) to self-administer the medications left at bedside. * Resident 21 was observed with multiple medications at bedside. However, Resident 21 was assessed to be mentally and physically incapable of self-administering medications. In addition, there were no physician's orders to self-administer and to administer the medications found at bedside. These failures had the potential for Resident 21 to administer the medications inaccurately and could affect his well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications revised 2/2025 showed the following:- Residents have the right to self-administer medication if the IDT has determined that is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so;- As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the IDT assesses each resident's cognitive and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the personal property was protected from loss or theft for one of three final sampled residents (Resident 14) reviewed for personal property. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 14's CPAP machine was listed in the resident's inventory list. This failure had the potential for the resident's property to get lost or stolen.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Personal Property revised 3/2025 showed the resident's personal belongings and clothing are inventoried and documented upon admission and updated as necessary. On 2/11/26, Resident 14's Responsible Party filed a complaint with the CDPH office alleging when Resident 14 was transported to their house, the resident received a different CPAP machine than what she provided with the facility. Closed medical record review for Resident 14 was initiated on 2/18/26. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 2/10/26. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled resident (Resident 7) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. * The facility failed to implement Resident 7's non-pharmacological interventions for the use of mirtazapine and trazodone (antidepressant) medications. This failure had the potential for adverse effects from the psychotropic medications and to negatively impact the residents' well-being.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychoactive/ Behavior Assessment (undated) showed prior to the use of Psychoactive medication there should be a documented trial of alternatives (non-pharmacological intervention/ NPI). In addition, further review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 7/2025 showed, non-pharmacological approaches are used (unless contraindicated) to minimize the need for medications, permit the lowest possible dose, and allow for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the PASRR was complete for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 5). * Resident 5 did not receive a Level II mental health evaluation, after a Level 1 Screening was positive for serious mental illness reviewed for PASRR. This failure posed the risk for Resident 5 not receiving specialized services beneficial to the resident's wellbeing.Findings: Medical record review for Resident 5 was initiated on 2/17/26. Resident 5 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 5's Level 1 PASRR screening completed by the SNF dated 12/29/25, showed Resident 5 was positive for serious mental illness and a Level II mental health evaluation referral was required. Review of Resident 5's Unable to Complete Level II Evaluation for Serious Mental Illness dated 1/1/26, showed a Level II Mental Health Evaluation was not scheduled for the following reason: facility staff were unresponsive to two or more separate attempts of communication within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review, the facility failed to develop the comprehensive plan of care to reflect the individual care needs for two of 12 final sampled residents (Residents 21 and 57). * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 21's behavior of ordering and keeping medications at bedside. * The facility failed to develop a care plan problem to address Resident 57's Permacath related to dialysis use. These failures had the potential risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents.Findings: 1. On 2/17/26 at 0908 hours, Resident 21 was observed sleeping in bed. A bag containing an albuterol (used to treat sudden breathing issues by relaxing muscles in the airways) inhaler was observed on top of a black container on the resident's overbed table. On 2/18/26 at 1100 hours, Resident 21 was observed lying in bed in the room. A bottle of Refresh eyedrops (artificial tears), a bottle of ketorolac eyedrop (ophthalmic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one non-sampled resident (Resident 61) reviewed for pressure injury was provided the necessary care and services. The facility failed to ensure Resident 61's LAL mattress setting was accurate to the resident's weight and comfort. This failure had the potential for the resident not to receive the appropriate care and services to promote skin healing. Findings: According to National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) 2019 Clinical Practice Guideline, a support surface is a specialized device designed for pressure redistribution, microclimate management, and other therapeutic functions. These devices include mattresses, bed systems, overlays, and seat cushions. In low air loss mattresses, alternating air pressure mode provides pressure relief and redistribution by cyclically inflating and deflating air cells, promoting circulation and preventing pressure ulcers. Static mode,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 7) was free from accident hazards. * The facility failed to implement bilateral floor mattress as ordered by the physician as a fall risk precaution for Resident 7. This failure had the potential for serious injury to the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Floor Mat Safety and Use revised date 10/2025 showed the purpose is to prevent slips, trips, and falls related to improper placement, condition, or maintenance of floor mats and to ensure compliance with safety standards. All floor mats must be non-slip, lay flat, remain clean and dry, and not create hazards or obstruct mobility devices. On 2/17/26 at 0930 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 7 was observed lying in bed with bilateral floor mats in place. On 2/19/26 at 0939 hours, an observation of Resident 7 and concurrent interview was conducted with CNA 3. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 9) received care and services to maintain acceptable nutritional status. * The facility failed to ensure the RD's recommendations for Cholecalciferol 2,000 IU oral daily, Vitamin C 500 mg oral daily for 30 days and Prostat SF (liquid protein supplement) 30 ml oral daily was implemented. This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 9's nutritional status.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Weight Loss - Clinical Protocol revised date 9/2025 showed the physician will help identify medical conditions (cancer, cardiac or renal disease, depression, dental problems, etc.) and medications that may be causing weight gain or loss or increasing risk for either gaining or losing weight. The physician (or staff, based on a discussion with the physician) will document relevant medical information regarding the nature, severity, causes, and consequences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the intravenous access for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 37). * The facility failed to ensure the PICC line external catheter and arm circumference measurements were completed and documented upon admission in the medical records for Resident 37. This failure had the potential to delay the identification of catheter related complications for the resident.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled PICC Line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) revised date 4/2025 showed, the facility ensures safe insertion, maintenance, and removal of PICC lines using infection prevention practices to prevent bloodstream infections and ensure resident safety. The purpose is to standardize PICC care, prevent infection, promote staff competency, and ensure CMS compliance. Medical record review for Resident 37 was initiated on 2/17/26. Resident 37 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 43) reviewed for oxygen therapy. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 43's oxygen tubing was labeled and dated. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk of receiving improper respiratory care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Oxygen Administration date revised 10/2025 showed the purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. On 2/17/26 at 0941 hours, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident 43 was observed lying in bed and receiving oxygen at 3 LPM via CPAP mask which was attached to the oxygen machine concentrator. In addition, the oxygen tubing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide adequate pain management for two of two final sampled residents (Residents 21 and 56) reviewed for pain management. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 21 was administered oxycodone (narcotic analgesic) medication as per the physician's order. In addition, the facility failed to monitor Resident 21's sedation level, BP, and apical pulse per the physician's order related to the administration of oxycodone medication. * Resident 56's ordered pain scale did not match the facility's standardized pain scale. In addition, the resident was administered PRN pain medication for a pain level of 5, which was below the ordered pain level of 6-10. These failures had the potential for Residents 21 and 56 to not receive effective treatment for pain.1. Review of the facility's P&P review titled Pain Assessment and Management dated 10/2025 showed the following: - Possible physiological signs of pain, including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate dialysis care was provided for one of two final sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for dialysis services. * The facility failed to ensure the emergency dialysis kit kept at bedside was complete and contained a scissor clamp for Resident 9. This failure posed the risk of possible medical complications for Resident 9. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Dialysis Care revised dated 5/11/25, showed to keep dialysis emergency kit at bedside in case of bleeding from the shunt site/ dialysis catheter. Medical record review for Resident 9 was initiated on 2/18/26. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 9's H&P examination dated 1/22/26, showed Resident 9 had no capacity to understand and make decisions. In addition, Resident 9 had a diagnosis of ESRD and was on renal dialysis. Review of Resident 9's care plan date initiated 1/21/26, showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of five final sampled resident (Resident 43) reviewed for the side rail use remained free from the accident hazards associated with the use of the elevated side rails. * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order was obtained for the use of bilateral half side rails for Resident 43. * The facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed to address the use of bilateral half side rails for Resident 43. * The facility failed to ensure the side rail assessment and the least restrictive interventions were completed prior to the use of bilateral half side rails for Resident 43. These failures had the potential risk for serious injury to the resident.Findings: Per the FDA's Safety Alert titled Entrapment Hazards with Hospital Bed Side Rails dated 1995, residents most at risk for entrapment are those who are frail or elderly or those who have conditions such as agitation, delirium, confusion,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacy Consultant's recommendations from drug regimen review in January 2026 were acted upon for one of five final sampled residents (Resident 7) reviewed for pharmacy services. * The facility failed to ensure the drug regimen review recommendations of trying and documenting non-pharmacological interventions for January 2026 were acted upon for Resident 7. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, increasing their risk for side effects.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychoactive/ Behavior Assessment (undated) showed, prior to the use of Psychoactive medication the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) assess the medical necessity/ how use of the Psychoactive medication would treat the medical symptoms and there should be a documented trial of alternatives (non-pharmacological intervention/ NPI). Review of the facility's P&P titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for one of 12 final sampled residents (Resident 56). * The facility failed to ensure the Resident 56's pain level monitoring for each shift was accurately documented. This failure resulted in inaccurate medical records. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Charting and Documentation revised July 2025 showed the medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care, documentation will be complete and accurate. Medical record review for Resident 56 was initiated on 2/17/26. Resident 56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 56's Order Summary Report showed a physician's order dated 2/13/26, to monitor and assess the resident's pain level every shift, with zero for no pain, 1-4 for mild pain, 5-7 for moderate pain, and 8-10 for severe pain. Review of Resident 56's MAR for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to monitor and address the use of the antibiotics for one final sampled resident (Resident 51) and one non-sampled resident (Resident 40) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. * The facility failed to ensure the McGeer's criteria assessment was completed in a timely manner for Residents 40 and 51 when the residents were started with antibiotics. This failure had the potential for the antibiotics to be used when they were not indicated and the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antibiotic Stewardship revised 1/2025 showed the following under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation section:- Prior to calling a physician/prescriber to communicate a suspected infection, the nurse will obtain and have the following information available:Clinical signs and symptoms of suspected infection (based on approved definitions of infection by using the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-23 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the glucometer in Medication Cart A, and the refrigerators used to store medications in Medication Rooms A and B were maintained in a safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure the glucometer calibration was conducted for the glucometer in Medication Cart A. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the glucose strips and control solutions had an expiration date of 90 days after opening, as per the manufacturer's information. * The facility failed to ensure the freezer compartment inside the refrigerator used for medications in Medication Room A was free of ice buildup. This had the potential to affect the refrigerator's functionality and the potentially affect the potency of the medications stored inside the refrigerator. These failures had the potential for the essential equipment to not function in the way it was intended and expose the residents to unsafe practices. Findings: 1. Review of the blood glucose meter manufacturer's information sheet titled Quality Assurance/…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls was accurately assessed for the risk for falls. * Residents 1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE], showed multiple inaccurate entries, which resulted for the resident to have a lower score for a fall risk. This failure had the potential for the resident to experience adverse events related to falls.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Falls and Fall Risk, Managing revised 10/2024 showed the staff will identify specific risks and causes to try and prevent falls. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 10/28/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged to home on 6/28/25. Further review of Resident 1's closed medical record showed the resident had an unwitnessed fall on 6/2/25, at 2310 hours. Review of Resident 1's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] at 0441 hours, showed multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from the physical restraints. * CNA 1 wrapped a bed sheet around Resident 1's waist and tied it behind the resident's wheelchair, preventing Resident 1 from easily removing the material. This failure posed the risk of restricting the resident's freedom of movement and further compromising the resident's independence and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Use of Restraint dated 2024 showed the restraints shall only be used for the safety and well-being of the resident (s) and only after other alternatives have been tried unsuccessfully. Restraint shall only be used to treat the resident's medical symptom(s) and never for discipline or staff convenience, or for the prevention of falls. The definition of restraint is based on the functional status of the resident and not the device. If the resident cannot remove a device in the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to interview Resident 1 (alleged victim) and CNA 1 (alleged perpetrator) when Resident Representative 1 reported Resident 1 was tied to his wheelchair with a bedsheet, and when Resident 1 alleged CNA 1 hit him in the face and kicked him in the stomach. This failure had the potential to put the resident at risk for further abuse.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Elder/Dependent Adult Abuse dated 2/2023 showed under the section Investigation/Action, the facility will:- identify and interview all persons involved including alleged victim, perpetrator, witness, others who may have knowledge of alleged violation;- focus on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment has occurred and the extent/cause;- document evidence that all alleged abuse violations are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1). * The facility failed to ensure the physician was notified in a timely manner when Resident Representative 1 reported Resident 1 was tied to his wheelchair with a bedsheet, and when Resident 1 alleged CNA 1 hit him in the face and kicked him in the stomach * The facility failed to ensure the physician and resident representative were notified when Resident 1 was found on the floor and was observed with purplish discoloration on his left thigh. In addition, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of the neurological status was conducted when the resident had unwitnessed fall. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 not to receive appropriate care and treatment.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Acute Condition Changes- Clinical Protocol dated 12/2024 showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the quality care and services were provided for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 8) and two nonsampled residents (Residents 26 and 293). * The facility failed to ensure the physician's order was obtained, the assessment was completed, and the appropriate instructions were obtained to maintain the appropriate care of the resident's blood glucose monitoring device for Resident 26. * The facility failed to ensure the transfer orders and instructions from the acute care hospital were followed through and communicated to the resident's attending physician for Resident 293. * The facility failed to assess Resident 8 and notify the physician timely when Resident 8's oxygen saturation levels were 91 to 92% as per the physician's order to keep the oxygen saturation above 92%. These failures had the potential for the residents to not receive the necessary care and services to maintain their highest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the intravenous accesses for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 33), and two nonsampled residents (Residents 292 and 293). * The facility failed to ensure the PICC line external catheter baseline measurements were obtained and documented for Resident 292. * The facility failed to ensure the PICC line external catheter baseline measurements were obtained and documented for Resident 293. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 33's PIV site was labeled with the date, time, and licensed nurse's initials. These failures had the potential to delay the identification of intravenous catheter related complications for the residents. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Central Venous Catheter Dressing Changes dated 4/2024 showed the dressing of the central venous catheter is routinely changed at least five to seven days or as needed when the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the safe respiratory care services for two of four final sampled residents (Residents 8 and 294) reviewed for the respiratory care. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 8's non-invasive ventilator machine was cleaned as per the manufacturer's guidelines and the headgear and tubing were cleaned as per the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 294's CPAP machine was cleaned as per the manufacturer's guidelines and failed to ensure the mask with straps and tubing were placed in the clear plastic bag when not in used. These failures had the risk for equipment contamination and respiratory complications, which might adversely affect the health and well-being of Residents 8 and 294. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled CPAP/BiPAP P&P revised 12/2024 showed to review the physician's order to determine the oxygen concentration and flow, and the PEEP…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services to ensure the accurate administration of the medications as evidenced by: * LVN 2 failed to administer Resident 542's dexamethasone (steroid, anti-inflammation medication) as per the physician's order. This failure had the potential to negatively affect Resident 542's health condition, for possible complications. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised 4/2024 showed the medications are administered in accordance with the prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Medications are administered within one hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified. On 2/25/25 at 0906 hours, a medication administration observation for Resident 542 was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 prepared and administered Resident 542 the following medications: - one-half tablet of dexamethasone 1 mg; - one tablet of atorvastatin (anticholesterol)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility review, the facility failed to ensure three of five final sampled residents (Residents 27, 33, and 36) reviewed for the unnecessary medications were free from the unnecessary psychotropic drugs. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 33's orthostatic blood pressure was monitored as ordered by the physician related to the use of the sertraline (antidepressant) medication. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 36's orthostatic blood pressures were accurately monitored for the use of the Seroquel (antipsychotic medication), bupropion (antidepressant medication), and desvenlafaxine (antidepressant medication); the facility failed to document the implementation of the non-pharmacological interventions for Resident 36's use of the Seroquel, bupropion, desvenlafaxine, and Depakote(mood stabilizer) medications. In addition, the facility failed to accurately monitor the specific behavior manifestation for Resident 36's use of the Seroquel medication. * The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the food safety and sanitation guidelines were followed when: * Seven cups of apple juice and one cup of yogurt were unlabeled and undated inside the walk-in refrigerator. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illnesses for the residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen. Findings: Review of the facility's document showed 55 of 55 residents receiving food prepared in the kitchen. Review of the facility's P&P titled Labeling/Date Marking and Safe Storage of Refrigerated and Frozen Foods revised 1/1/18, showed to provide a means for the safe storage of refrigerated items that have been opened and may not be in their original container. Any foods removed from original container will be properly labeled as follows: the name of the food item being stored and the date the food was removed from its original container and stored. On 2/24/25 at 0800 hours, during the initial tour of the kitchen, an observation and concurrent interview was conducted with the DSS. Seven cups of apple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolatedConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility document review, the facility failed to ensure the Facility Assessment addressed or included the following: 1. Active involvement of required individuals in developing the Facility Assessment; 2. Resources necessary to care for residents including weekends; 3. A plan to maximize recruitment and retention of direct care staff; and 4. A contingency plan for staffing needs. This failure had the potential to not meet the residents' care needs if the assessed population's needs and resources were not comprehensively identified and addressed. Findings: According to the CMS QSO-24-13-NH dated 6/18/24, with an implementation date of 8/8/24, CMS had issued a revised guidance for long-term care facility assessment requirement. The Facility Assessment should address and included the active involvement of the direct care staff in developing the Facility Assessment. Also included the staffing resources necessary to care for the residents, including the weekends; a plan to maximize recruitment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to perform the hand hygiene and maintain the infection practices to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection. * The Activity Assistant failed to performed hand hygiene after removing the PPE when coming out of Room A with Novel Respiratory Precaution sign. * CNA 7 failed to perform hand hygiene after removing the PPE and leaving Room A. * CNA 1 failed to performed hand hygiene after removing the PPE from answering the call light in Room A. * The facility failed to ensure CNA 8 followed the enhanced barrier precautions for Resident 292 when changing the resident's disposable briefs. These findings failed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised 8/2022 showed this facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infection. Hand hygiene is the final step after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to protect the resident's rights from the verbal and physical abuses by another resident for two of six sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3). * Resident 1 was being assisted by two nursing aide students when Resident 1 angrily yelled and demanded Resident 2 to leave Room A. Resident 1 hit Resident 2's right foot as witnessed by the two nursing aide students on 11/16/24. Resident 2 was assessed with no physical injuries, monitored for emotional distress, and transferred to Room B. * CNA 3 witnessed Resident 1 yelling and cursing at Resident 3 on 12/13/24. Resident 3 stated Resident 1 also raised his walker as if going to hit him. Resident 3 stated he felt scared to go back to Room A. Resident 3 was then transferred to Room C. These failures had the potential to cause further serious injuries and/or psychosocial harm to Residents 2 and 3, and risk to other residents. Findings: Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement the P&P for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act when the facility did not report the allegation of abuse timely as per the facility's P&P for two of six sampled residents (Resident 2 and 3) * Resident 1 was being assisted by two nurse aide students when Resident 1 angrily yelled and demanded Resident 2 to leave Room A. Resident 1 hit Resident 2's right foot as witnessed by the two nurse aide students, on 11/16/24. Resident 2 was assessed with no physical injuries, monitored for emotional distress, and was then transferred to Room B. The initial SOC-341 filed to CDPH on 11/16/24, was incomplete and did not show the description of the incident. Additional information to show the description of the incident was filed on 11/18/24, which was 48 hours after the incident. * CNA 3 witnessed Resident 1 yell and curse at Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse as per the facility's P&P and monitor the residents after the alleged abuse for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3). * Resident 1 was being assisted by two nurse aide students, when Resident 1 angrily yelled and demanded Resident 2 to leave Room A. Resident 1 hit Resident 2's right foot, as witnessed by the two nurse aide students, on 11/16/24. Resident 2 was assessed with no physical injuries, monitored for emotional distress, and was then transferred to Room B. The facility failed to interview staff members on all shifts who had a contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident asper the facility's P&P. Furthermore, the facility failed to ensure the SSD visited Residents 1 and 2 daily for 72 hours, as per the facility's investigation report. * CNA 3 witnessed Resident 1 yell and curse at Resident 3 on 12/13/24. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate infection control practices designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment and help prevent the development and transmission of infections were implemented. * The facility failed to include the residents who exhibited sign and symptoms of infection who were not prescribed antibiotics on the Surveillance program from January 2023 to February 2024. * CNA 3 failed to perform hand hygiene after touching Resident 35's shoulder and prior to serving a meal tray to Resident 50. * The facility failed to clean and disinfect the blood pressure machine between Resident 24 and Resident 404's use. * The facility failed to disinfect the blood glucose monitoring device after being used and the LVN did not change gloves prior to insulin administration for Resident 37. * The facility failed to allow the alcohol to dry prior to Lovenox (Enoxaparin Sodium, a medicine used to treat or prevent a type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-22 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to implement their antibiotic stewardship program when the facility failed to conduct an assessment for the McGeer's criteria to determine the true infection. This failure had the potential for inaccurately identifying for true infections and potentially inhibited the residents' physicians from discontinuing the unnecessary antibiotics. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Antibiotic Stewardship revised 12/2021 showed antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Review of the facility's infection control binder showed McGeer's Infection Surveillance form or Surveillance Data Collection Form being used to assess for McGeer's criteria to determine the true infection. Review of the facility's monthly infection control surveillance forms from 6/2023 through 2/2024, showed the following surveillance data. However, the facility failed to show documentation the McGeer's/Surveillance Data Collection form was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to maintain the essential equipment in a safe operating condition. * The facility failed to ensure the ice machine located in the dining room was cleaned and sanitized as per the manufacturer's instruction manual. This failure had the potential for the ice machine not being maintained in a safe operating condition and posed the risk of equipment to function improperly. Findings: According to the USDA Food Code 4-501.11 Equipment 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, (A) Equipment shall be maintained in a state of repair and condition that meets the requirements specified under Parts 4-1 and 4-2. Review of the ice machine manufacturer's instruction manual, Section B showed in part, cleaning and sanitizing instructions. The icemaker must be cleaned and sanitized at least once a year. More frequent cleaning and sanitizing may be required in some water conditions. - Step 9. In bad or severe water conditions, turn off the power supply, then remove, clean (cleaning solution = 5 oz. Hoshizaki Scale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 505) was assessed to safely self-administer the medications prior to performing the self-administration of medications. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's physiological well-being and could administer the medications inaccurately. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Self-Administration of Medications showed the residents who wish to self-administer their medications may do so, if it is determined that they are capable of doing so. As part of their overall evaluation, the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether a resident is capable of self-administering medications. If the staff determine that a resident cannot safely self-administer medications, the nursing staff will administer the resident's medication. In addition, the staff shall identify and give to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of the changes in conditions for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 305) as evidenced by: * The facility failed to notify the physician for Resident 305's multiple scattered reddish, maroon colored skin discoloration to the bilateral upper extremities. This failure had the potential for Resident 305 not to receive the appropriate treatment to address his medical needs and to have a delay in care and treatments. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised September 2023 showed the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or On-Call Physician when there has been: i. instructions to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition. Regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition, the Nursing Supervisor/Charge Nurse will inform the resident of any changes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the privacy was provided for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 18) and three nonsampled residents (Residents 14, 24, and 32). * The privacy curtain was not pulled while providing the ADL care to Residents 14, 18, and 32. * The facility failed to ensure the privacy was provided during the GT medication administration for Resident 24. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the dignity of the residents and violate the residents' right to privacy. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Dignity revised November 2023 showed the residents are always treated with dignity and respect. Staff promote, maintain, and protect resident privacy, including bodily privacy during assistance with personal care and during treatment procedures. 1. On 3/19/24 at 0822 hours, CNA 5 was observed inside Resident 18's room. Resident 18's privacy curtain was observed open and Resident 18 was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide a summary of the baseline care plan for two of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 304 and 307). This failure had the potential for inappropriate interventions and care for these residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans- Baseline revised March 2022 showed the resident and/or representative are provided a written summary of the baseline care plan (in a language that the resident/representative can understand) that includes, but is not limited to the following: - the stated goals and objectives of the resident; - a summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions; - any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility; and - any updated information based on the details of the comprehensive care plan as necessary. Provision of the summary to the resident and/or resident representative is documented in the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive plans of care to reflect the individual care needs of three of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 12, 304, and 505). * The facility failed to develop a care plan with goal and interventions to address Resident 12's RNA services. * The facility failed to implement a care plan intervention to place TED hose (Thrombo-Embolic Deterrent, specially designed knee-high, thigh-high or waist high stockings that help prevent blood clots and swelling in your legs) to swollen extremities for Resident 304. * The facility failed to implement a pad alarm in bed/wheelchair for Resident 505. These failures posed the risk of not providing appropriate, consistent, and individualized care to these residents. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans-Comprehensive revised September 2023 showed each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to incorporate identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive plans of care for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 12) was revised to reflect the resident's current care needs and interventions. * The facility failed to ensure Resident 12's plan of care was revised to reflect Resident 12 was discharged from therapy services. This failure posed the risk of not providing Resident 12 with individualized and person-centered care. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Care Plans-Comprehensive revised September 2023 showed the Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the review and updating of care plans when there had been a significant change in the resident's condition; when the desired outcomes is not met; when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and at least quarterly. Medical record review for Resident 12 was initiated on 3/21/24. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure a non-English speaking resident's communication needs were met for one nonsampled resident (Resident 31) and failed to ensure the translation service contact information was available for staff. These failures had the potential for a delay in the facility's ability to communicate with the resident. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Communication Barriers, Reduction Of, undated, showed the facility will provide methods of communication to assure adequate communication between residents and staff. Medical record review for Resident 31 was initiated on 3/21/24. Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 31's MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 31 spoke a non-English language and requested an interpreter to communicate with the health care staff. Review of Resident 31's SBAR Communication Form and Progress Note - V 3 dated 3/17/24, showed a change of condition for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary care and services were provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable well-being for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 305). * The facility failed to identify and assess for Resident 305's multiple scattered reddish, maroon-colored skin discoloration to his bilateral upper extremities. This failure had the potential risk of not providing appropriate care for Resident 305. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised September 2023 showed the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or On-Call Physician when there has been: i. instructions to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition. Regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition, the Nursing Supervisor/ Charge Nurse will inform the resident of any changes in the resident's medical/mental condition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, facility document review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 505) remained free from the accident hazards. * The facility failed to monitor Resident 505 for 72 hours after her fall according to the facility's P&P. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for serious injury. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes revised November 2023 showed after a fall observe for delayed complications of a fall for approximately forty-eight (48) hours after an observed or suspected fall and will document findings in the medical record. Review of the facility's P&P titled Neurological Assessment revised November 2023 showed neurological assessments are indicated: (a) upon physician order; (b) following an unwitnessed fall; (c) following a fall or other accident/injury involving head trauma; or (d) when indicated by resident's condition. Medical record review for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the necessary GT care for one nonsampled resident (Resident 24). * The facility failed to ensure the gastric residual volume (volume of fluid remaining in the stomach) was checked before flushing and administering a bolus feeding (a single dose of medication or other substance given over a short period of time) to Resident 24. This failure posed the potential risk for Resident 24 to have aspiration during the medication administration and for developing complications related to GT. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications Through an Enteral Tube revised March 2023 showed to check the gastric residual volume (GRV) to assess for tolerance of enteral feeding and when correct tube placement and acceptable GRV had been verified, flush tubing with 15-30 ml warm sterile water (or prescribed amount). On 3/19/24 at 0830 hours, a medication administration observation was conducted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to provide the pharmaceutical services for three of 22 final sampled residents (Residents 9, 13, and 50) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 51) to meet the needs of each resident as evidenced by: * The facility failed to ensure the controlled drug Percocet (opioid analgesic) 5 mg-325 mg tablet signed out from the controlled drug record was documented as administered on the MAR for Resident 9; and the controlled drug, Norco (opioid analgesic) 5 mg-325 mg tablet signed out from the controlled drug record was documented as administered on the MAR for Resident 50. * The facility failed to the removed and not used controlled drug tablet was properly discard and not placed back into the bubble pack and taped for Resident 51. * Resident 13's Fleets enema (a liquid laxative administered into the rectum) was not administered as ordered by the physician. These failures posed the risk of diversion of the controlled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 2) was provided the management for the use of psychotropic medications (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior). * The facility failed to ensure the non-pharmacological approaches were provided to Resident 2 while receiving alprazolam (to treat anxiety disorders and panic disorders-sudden, unexpected attacks of extreme fear and worry about these attacks), bupropion (to treat depression), citalopram (to treat depression), and Quetiapine (Seroquel, medicine used to treat several kinds of mental health conditions including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. It helped regulate the mood, behaviors, and thoughts) medications. This failure had the potential to cause harm to Resident 2. Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring revised March 2023 showed non-pharmacological approaches would be utilized to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%. The facility's medication rate was 10.34%. One of two licensed nurses (LVN 2) observed administering the medications was found to have errors while administering the medications to two nonsampled residents (Residents 24 and 404). * The facility failed to ensure Resident 24 received the prescribed nasal gel and correct amount of the diclofenac sodium topical gel (to relieve pain from arthritis in certain joints such as those of the knees, ankles, feet, elbows, and hands). * LVN 2 prepared the expired vitamin D3 for Resident 404 during the medication pass observation. These failures had the potential for the residents to receive ineffective therapeutic effects of the medications and had negatively affect the residents' health. Findings: 1. Review of the facility's P&P titled Administering Medications revised date December 2021 showed the individual administering the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, facility record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the medications were properly stored and labeled for two of 22 sampled residents (Residents 307 and 505) and one nonsampled resident (Resident 37); and failed to ensure the medication room refrigerator temperatures were monitored in accordance with the facility's P&P. * The facility failed to dispose the insulin pen beyond the used by date for Resident 37. * The facility failed to dispose the medication and medical supplies after the expiration date. * The facility failed to dispose the opened sterile packages of Collagen dressing and disposable urinary drainage bag. * The facility failed to appropriately label the Apokyn Pen, blood glucose strips, and Miralax bottle with an open date. * The facility failed to monitor the temperatures of the medication room refrigerator. * The facility failed to ensure the medications for Resident 307 were not left unattended at the bedside. * The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 13) was complete and accurate. This failure had the potential for the resident's accurate clinical status not being available and communicated to care team. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 13 was initiated on 3/29/24. Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. a. Review of Resident 13's MAR for March 2024 showed an order dated 3/13/24, for a Fleets enema (a liquid laxative administered into the rectum) to be administered in the afternoon for bowel management. The MAR showed it was signed as administered on 3/13/24 at 1300 hours. On 3/19/24 at 1038 hours, an interview was conducted with Resident 13. Resident 13 stated she did not receive an enema. On 3/21/24 at 1225 hours, a telephone interview was conducted with LVN 2. LVN 2 stated he did not administer an enema to Resident 13, and if the MAR showed a check mark for administered, it was done in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-22 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure the call light in the resident's room was functioning for one of 22 final sampled residents (Resident 204). This failure had the potential for a delay in assisting the resident. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 204 was initiated on 3/19/24. Resident 204 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/19/24 at 0816 hours, an interview and concurrent observation was conducted with Resident 204. Resident 204 stated they would like their television volume turned up. When asked if the resident pressed her call light button for the staff's assistance, the resident stated she just did. An observation of the call light illuminator in the hallway, above the resident's doorway, was not illuminated to show the call-light button was activated. The resident was asked to push the call light button again, and it was observed that the resident used her thumb to press the call light button. However, there was still no indicator light illuminated above the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's medical record was complete and accurate for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). * Resident 1's 72 Hour Neuro Check - List had incorrect time intervals between the one hour and two hour neuro check section, which resulted in all subsequent time entries to be delayed by one hour. This failure posed the risk for the resident's care needs not being met as his medical record information was inaccurate.Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Neuro Assessment revised 10/2024 showed neuro assessments will be conducted after any unwitnessed fall. Closed medical record review for Resident 1 was initiated on 10/28/25. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was discharged to home on 6/28/25. Review of Resident 1's 72 Hour Neuro Check - List dated 6/2/25, at 2310 hours showed Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall. Review of Resident 1's 72 Hour Neuro Check - List dated 6/3/25, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-02-27 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review, the facility failed to ensure the MDS was coded accurately for one of 14 final sampled residents (Resident 33). This failure had the potential for the resident to not receive individualized plans of care to address the resident's individual care needs. Findings: Medical record review for Resident 33 was initiated on 2/24/25. Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 33's Order Summary Report dated 2/25/25, showed a physician's order dated 1/25/25, to administer heparin (anticoagulant medication) 5000 units subcutaneously every 12 hours for DVT prophylaxis. Review of Resident 33's admission MDS dated [DATE], showed Resident 33 was not coded for the use of an anticoagulant medication. On 2/26/25 at 1511 hours, an interview and concurrent medical record review for Resident 33 was conducted with the MDS Coordinator. The MDS Coordinator verified the above findings and stated she coded the MDS assessment incorrectly. On 2/27/25 at 1040 hours,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-02-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, medical record review, and facility P&P review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal immunization was offered and administered to one nonsampled residents (Resident 15) reviewed for pneumococcal immunization. This failure placed the residents at risk to acquire pneumococcal infection (also known as pneumococcal disease, is caused by the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae, or pneumococcus). Findings: Review of the facility's P&P titled Pneumococcal Vaccine revised 10/2019 showed all the residents will be offered pneumococcal vaccines to aid in preventing pneumonia/pneumococcal infections. Review of the Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine: What You Need to Know vaccine information sheet dated 5/12/23, showed pneumococcal conjugate vaccine helps protect against bacteria that cause pneumococcal disease. There are three pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV13, PCV15, and PCV20). The different vaccines are recommended for different people based on the age and medical status. Adults 65 years or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NAHS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 4.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAHS HOLDING INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2018 |
| DAHL, BRENDEN | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/21/2018 |
| ELLIS-SHERINIAN, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2021 |
| JERGENSEN, JEREMY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 03/21/2018 |
| DALY, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/21/2018 |
| LUNDQUIST, VICTOR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/21/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $565K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555671. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.