Lincoln Square Post Acute Care
1032 N. Lincoln Street, Stockton, CA 95203 · For profit - Corporation · 68 certified beds · (209) 466-5341 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (6% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.6% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.7% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.2% | 1.6% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.5% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 8.0% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 3.4% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.9% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.0% | 23.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.98 | 2.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.46 | 1.57 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 265 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 77.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.7%CMS range 60.8–72.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.4–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 77.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 68.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 86.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.1%CMS range 5.7–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 68 beds and averages 60.5 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.03 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.57 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.21 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 6% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent a recurrence of a pressure injury (sores (ulcers) that happen on areas of the skin that are under pressure) for one of three residents (Resident 1) who had a history of a resolved pressure ulcer in the sacrococcygeal area (lower back/tailbone area), active moisture-associated skin damage (MASD - skin damage caused by prolonged exposure to moisture) to the right buttock, bowel and bladder incontinence, decreased bed mobility, and dependence on staff for repositioning, when Resident 1was not repositioned while in bed, resulting in Resident 1 remaining on her back in the same position for more than two hours despite complaints of back and buttocks pain. These failures placed Resident 1 at risk for recurrence of pressure injury and skin impairment, including MASD.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (high blood sugar that has caused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident 1) had access to water and fluids when Resident 1 complained of dry mouth, dry lips, and thirst and was unable to obtain fluids because the water pitcher was not within Resident 1's reach and no cup was available, which prevented Resident 1 from accessing and consuming fluids when needed.These failures had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for dehydration (when the body does not get enough fluids to function properly), falls, and choking.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including unspecified diastolic heart failure (a condition where the heart is stiff and does not fill properly, making it harder to pump blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (high blood sugar that has caused damage to the kidneys), rheumatoid arthritis (a disease that causes joint pain, swelling, and stiffness), anxiety disorder, recurrent dislocation of the right shoulder, muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely fully assess Resident 1's pain and provide non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions, such as repositioning, to help relieve pain for one of three residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1, who required staff assistance to reposition in bed, complained of back and buttocks pain and remained lying flat in bed for more than two hours without a complete pain assessment or repositioning.These failures resulted in Resident 1 continuing to experience pain and discomfort and delayed identification and implementation of appropriate interventions to relieve the pain.Findings:Review of Resident 1's admission RECORD indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic chronic kidney disease (high blood sugar that has caused damage to the kidneys), rheumatoid arthritis (a disease that causes joint pain, swelling, and stiffness), anxiety disorder, recurrent dislocation of the right shoulder, muscle weakness, chronic pain syndrome (long-lasting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 63 residents who received meals from the kitchen when:1. Two open boxes with green lettuce and cheese were placed on the kitchen floor;2. Dietary staff did not fully cover the hair on the back of their head in the kitchen;3. One mesh bag of yellow onion was placed on the kitchen food storage room floor, and a bag of dry cereal and flour were not sealed in a container,4. Spinach was thawed in a sink next to two open chemical buckets; and5. A plastic food cover, an open box of gloves, and a grill cleaner was kept in a kitchen cabinet with cleaning supplies. These failures had the potential of leading to food borne illness (an illness that comes from eating contaminated food) in the 63 residents eating facility prepared meals.Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 03/24/26 at 8:23 a.m., with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and Dietary Aide (DA) 2 in the kitchen, DA 2 placed two open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage and refuse were properly contained in the kitchen and outside dumpster areas for a total facility census of 64 residents, when one trash can inside the kitchen and one of two outside dumpster lids were observed not closed. This failure had the potential to expose the resident's environment to pests, odors, and disease.Findings:During an observation on 3/24/26 at 8:56 a.m. with the Dietary Supervisor (DS) in the kitchen, a trash can was observed with the lid propped open.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 8:57 a.m. with the [NAME] (CK) in the kitchen, the CK confirmed the trash can was not closed. The CK stated the trash can should have been fully covered with a lid.During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 9:09 a.m. with the DS in the outside dumpster area of the facility, a dumpster was observed with the lid propped open. The DS stated the dumpster lid should have been closed to prevent contamination and pests.During an interview on 3/26/26 at 3:49…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to practice appropriate infection prevention and control measures for a census of 64 residents when:1. Resident 102's nebulizer tubing (plastic tubing used to deliver breathing treatments) was not stored in a protective bag after use.2. The facility did not implement their identified control measures ( an action aimed to eliminate a hazard or at least reduce the risk) in order to identify any potential growth of Legionella (a bacteria that can grow in water systems and cause a serious lung infection, especially in older adults and those with weak immune systems) in the water system.These failures had the potential to increase the risk of infection transmission to residents, staff, and visitors.Findings:1. Review of Resident 102's admission RECORD indicated Resident 102 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes breathing difficult), dependence on supplemental oxygen, heart failure, muscle weakness, and need for assistance with personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0636 — patternAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) comprehensive assessments were completed for 4 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 52, Resident 68, Resident 76, and Resident 87), when comprehensive assessments were not performed within the required time frame for Resident 52, Resident 68, Resident 76, and Resident 87.This failure had the potential to result in failure to evaluate residents' overall health status, delayed or absent care plan initiation, and inappropriate interventions, placing residents at risk for harm.Findings:1. A review of Resident 52's admission Record indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility in 2026 with diagnoses which included acute embolism (a sudden, life-threatening obstruction of a lung artery, usually caused by a blood clot traveling from a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the legs) and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of left lower extremity, hemiplegia and hemiparesis (Hemiplegia; severe/total paralysis) and hemiparesis (mild/partial weakness) are neurological conditions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-27 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' assessments were completed for 4 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 55, Resident 46, Resident 56, and Resident 84), when quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool used by the facility) assessments were not performed within the required time frame for Resident 55, Resident 46, Resident 56, and Resident 84.This failure had the potential to result in failure to identify changes in residents' status, delayed care plan updates, and inappropriate interventions, placing residents at risk for harm.Findings:1. A review of Resident 55's admission Record indicated Resident 55 was admitted to the facility in 2025 with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body cannot properly use or make enough insulin, leading to high blood sugar levels), diplopia (double vision, is the perception of two images of a single object, either constantly or intermittently), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, atrioventricular block (a type of heart block where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately treat pain as ordered for six of thirty sampled residents (Resident 10, Resident 12, Resident 31, Resident 45, Resident 46, and Resident 47) when:1. Resident 10 received acetaminophen (an over-the-counter pain medication) for a documented pain level (using a numerical pain scale of 1 through 10 that measures the pain intensity and impact on daily life: 0 = no pain, 1 through 3 = mild pain, 4 through 6 = moderate pain, 7 through 9 = severe pain, and 10 = the worst pain imaginable) rated as a 7 or 8 when the order was written for a mild pain level of 1-3; and,2. Resident 12 received hydrocodone-acetaminophen (a combination opioid (strong) pain medication and a mild pain reliever) 5/325mg (milligram - a unit of measurement) for a documented moderate pain level rated as 6 when the order was written for severe pain level of 7-10. Resident 12 did not have a pain medication ordered to treat a moderate pain level; and,3. Resident 31 received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 52 and Resident 101) when:Staff called Resident 52 a feeder during mealtime; and 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 stood over Resident 101 while assisting with meals and did not position at Resident 101's eye level.These failures had the potential to negatively impact the psychosocial well-being (emotional and social functioning) of Resident 52 and Resident 101.Findings: 1. Review of Resident 52's admission RECORD indicated Resident 52 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including dysphagia oropharyngeal phase (difficulty swallowing caused by problems in the mouth or throat), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side (weakness or paralysis on the left side of the body due to a stroke). During an observation on 3/24/26 at 12:11 p.m., in the dining room, Licensed Nurse (LN 1) and Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA 2) were preparing to pass the meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 18) when, Resident 18 had a call light (device used to contact staff for assistance) that was not within Resident 18's reach.This deficient practice placed Resident 18 at increased risk for unmet care needs, delayed staff response, falls, and potential injury.Findings:Review of Resident 18's admission RECORD indicated Resident 18 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including gram-negative sepsis (a serious infection caused by bacteria in the blood), urinary tract infection, obstructive and reflux uropathy (urine flow blockage or backward flow), dementia (memory loss and confusion), abnormalities of gait and balance (difficulty walking and maintaining balance), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and personal history of venous thrombosis and embolism (blood clots in veins or lungs).During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/24/26 at 11:29 AM, with Resident 18 in Resident 18's room, Resident 18 was sitting in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 17) when, Resident 17 was provided a bathroom toilet that did not function.This failure negatively impacted Resident 17's homelike environment.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/24/26, at 4:05 p.m., with Resident 17's family member (FM 1),Resident 17's bathroom door had a sign indicating, do not use. The toilet in Resident 17's bathroom did not have any water and a red and black build up in the toilet bowl was observed. FM 1 stated Resident 17 did not like that he had to go to another resident bathroom to use a toilet and instead of taking him to his own bathroom the facility had to assist Resident 17 to another resident bathroom.During a concurrent observation and interview in Resident 17's room on 3/24/26, at 4:30 p.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 4, LN 4 verified Resident 17's bathroom was not working and stated it had not been working for weeks.During an interview on 3/24/26, at 4:40 p.m., with the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (written plan that guides staff on daily care, safety, and interventions based on the resident's needs) for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 63) when, Resident 63 refused to receive the COVID-19 (a contagious viral illness that affects the respiratory system) vaccine in April of 2025 and a care plan was not developed to help prevent Resident 63 from acquiring a COVID-19 infection.This failure resulted in Resident 63 acquiring a COVID-19 infection in the facility in September of 2025 and placed Resident 63 at risk of serious illness and complications related to COVID-19.Findings:Review of Resident 63's admission RECORD indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition with mood problems and symptoms such as hallucinations or confusion), epilepsy (a condition that causes seizures), glaucoma (an eye disease that can damage vision due to increased pressure in the eye), visual loss, anxiety disorder,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and treatment for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 47) when, Resident 47 complained of shortness of breath and the facility staff failed to obtain oxygen saturation as ordered and failed to implement available interventions, including administration of oxygen or an albuterol treatment ( a quick-relief or rescue medication used to treat or prevent breathing difficulties), prior to Resident 47 being transferred to the hospital.This failure had the potential to delay timely assessment and intervention for respiratory compromise, placing residents at risk for decreased oxygen levels and worsening condition.Findings:Review of Resident 47's admission RECORD indicated Resident 47 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a long-term lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe due to airflow limitation), chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a condition in which the lungs do not adequately oxygenate the blood), and a history of lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 63) ) was free from unnecessary medication administration when, Resident 63 received an antihypertensive medication (used to manage high blood pressure; BP) outside of the hold parameters (when a medication is not to given based on blood pressure readings) four times between February and March of 2026.This failure increased the potential for Resident 63 to experience side effects such as low BP, leading to further heart related complication.Findings:A review of Resident 63's admission Record indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to orthostatic hypotension (a sudden drop in blood pressure that occurs when standing up from a sitting or lying position), hypertension (a chronic condition where the force of blood pushing against artery walls is consistently too high), and repeated falls.A review of Resident 63's Order Summary Report dated 3/27/26, indicated, .Propranolol HCl [hydrochloride] Tablet [used to treat high blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure antibiotic use was supported by ongoing reassessment and documented justification to determine if the antibiotic should be continued for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident 57) when, Resident 57 was prescribed an antibiotic for extended or long-term use.This failure placed Resident 57 at risk for unnecessary prolonged antibiotic exposure, adverse effects (harmful or unwanted side effects), antibiotic resistance (when bacteria no longer respond to the medication), and development and spread of MDROs (Multidrug-resistant organisms - germs that do not respond to multiple antibiotics) to other residents and staff in the facility.Findings:Review of Resident 57's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 57 was admitted with diagnoses including, palliative care (medical care for people with serious illnesses, focusing on relieving symptoms, pain, and stress to improve quality of life), anxiety, Atrial Fibrillation (or A.Fib, heart rhythm disease), and chronic nonhealing left knee and thigh wound with abscess (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse (harsh and insulting language directed at a person; also known as verbal attack, verbal aggression, verbal assault) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 reported that a Licensed Nurse (LN) was rude to him and called him a thief on 1/10/26.This failure had the potential to a delayed investigation by the Department and the risk of negatively affecting Resident 1's psychosocial well-being.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2025.During a phone interview on 2/5/26, at 11:52 a.m., with Resident 1, Resident 1 stated on 1/10/26 in the early morning hours, he went to the snack room at the facility to get hot water for coffee, and a licensed nurse (LN) stated to him that he could not go into the snack room to get hot water. Resident 1 further stated the LN accused him of being a thief, and told him that if anything came up missing he would be the number one suspect. Resident 1 stated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accidents or hazards for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 exited the facility through an unlocked door on 3/22/25 and was missing from the facility for one and one-half hours before staff became aware. This failure resulted in Resident 1 falling out of her wheelchair sustaining injuries that included bruises (contusion, ecchymosis; skin discoloration from damaged, leaking blood vessels under the skin) and a facial laceration (cut) that required sutures (stitches). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 sustaining life-threatening injuries. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), chronic kidney disease (progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), and spinal stenosis (spinal stenosis happens when the space inside the backbone is too small, this can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-18 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — widespreadKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a resident's rights to privacy of personal and medical records when residents' meal tickets were discarded in the facility kitchen garbage bin for the 57 residents who ate facility prepared meals. This failure had the potential for unauthorized access of residents' personal and medical records. Findings: During an observation on 12/15/24, at 9:45 AM, with the Dietary Aide (DA) 1 in the dishwashing area, DA 1 was observed throwing uneaten food, used napkins, and residents' meal tickets left on the meal trays into the garbage bin. DA 1 confirmed the observation. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24, at 8:52 AM, with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS) in the dishwashing area, the DSS confirmed that DA 1 threw the residents' meal tickets into the garbage bin. The DSS also confirmed that multiple residents' meal tickets were returned with their meal trays to the kitchen. The DSS stated although this did not meet the facility's expectations, they currently did not have a process in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food storage and preparation, as well as maintain kitchen equipment and food contact surfaces in accordance with professional standards for food safety for the 57 residents who ate facility prepared meals when: 1. Expired food was not thrown away; 2. Food was not labeled/dated properly; 3. Non food items were found in the dry food storage room; 4. A coffee water filter was expired; 5. A fan located in the food prep area was not clean; 6. Various tray line pans were stacked and stored wet; 7. The food processor bowel was ready to use wet; and 8. The ice machine was dirty. These failures had the potential to put residents eating facility prepared meals at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on 12/15/24, at 8:10 AM, in the reach in refrigerator and dry storage the following items were found ready to serve. The findings were confirmed by the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS): a. Four out of twelve cases of strawberries (approximately 20 strawberries in each case) were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain trash in a closed dumpster for a census of 57 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to insect and rodent infestation. Findings: During a concurrent interview and observation on 12/15/24, at 9:18 AM, with the [NAME] (CK) 1, the trash bin for the facility was overflowing with trash bags and the lid was placed completely behind the bin. When asked why the bins were opened CK 1 stated the trash service placed them that way. During an interview on 12/16/24, at 10:58 AM, with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS), when interviewed about the trash bin lids being opened, the DSS stated the trash dumpster lids being opened was not the facility's normal process and it was important for the dumpster lids to be closed to avoid any pests. During an interview on 12/18/24 at 12:55 PM, with the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated the expectation was for the dumpster lids to be closed and there should be no garabage overflowing out of the dumpster to ensure no pests gets into the dumpster. The RD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not consistently implement an antibiotic stewardship program (to ensure medications used to treat infections are used only when necessary and appropriate) for a census of 57 residents when, Loeb (a set of minimum signs and symptoms that indicate a resident in long-term care likely has an infection and may need antibiotic) and/or McGeer criteria (a set of definitions used to identify infection after an antibiotic is started) were not consistently used to assess the initiation and/or the appropriateness of continued use of an antibiotic, including accurate documentation of the correct indication for use. This failure had the potential to result in antibiotics being prescribed when not indicated and the development of multi- drug resistant organisms (MDRO; germs that have developed the ability to survive antibiotics that were previously used to kill them; decreasing antimicrobial resistance (when antibiotics become ineffective against infection) requires antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention efforts). Findings: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident 119 was treated with dignity for a census of 57 when staff did not cover resident's genital area with a sheet while he was sleeping in bed. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 119's psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/24, at 10:02 a.m., in Resident 119's room, with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2, CNA 2 confirmed Resident 119 was not covered with a sheet and Resident 119's genitals were exposed while he was in bed sleeping. CNA 2 stated we have to cover it .his private part. CNA 2 further stated the expectation was for residents' private parts to be covered. CNA 2 explained the risk included a loss of dignity and feelings of shame. During an interview on 12/16/24, at 11:52 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated residents should be covered with a sheet when they were in bed for dignity. The ADON further stated, To prevent having residents exposed like that, staff should make rounds to make sure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to submit a new Level I PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review- a screening for mental illness and treatment to ensure the facility coordinates with the appropriate State-designated authority to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability or a related condition receives care and services appropriate to their needs) for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 2) when, a level II Mental Health Evaluation was not completed for Resident 2 due to Resident 2 being on isolation as a health or safety precaution which required the facility to submit a new Level I screening for Resident 2. This failure had the potential to place Resident 2 at risk for not receiving the necessary care or services. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 2 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by disruptions in thought process, perceptions, emotional responsiveness, and social interactions). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 269) received quality care when staff administered rapid-acting insulin to Resident 269 (Lispro-medication which starts to lower blood sugar within 10-15 minutes) on 12/17/24 based on a medication order that did not include parameters (a fixed limit that establishes how something must be done) defining when to hold/not administer the insulin; and staff did not notify the physician when Resident 269 did not eat her scheduled meal after the rapid-acting insulin was administered. These failures led to Resident 269 experiencing a hypoglycemic event (when the body's blood sugar level drops too low for the body to function properly) with a blood glucose (BG) of 36 (a BG below 70 is considered low BG; hypoglycemic) and needing emergent medical treatment. Findings: Review of Resident 269's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 269 was initially admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM- inability for the body to regulate blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe pharmaceutical services for a census of 57 residents when, narcotic medications (used for pain) were not accurately documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR, a document listing medications and monitoring parameters) when removed from the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, a paper record that kept track of opioid medication use for accountability) for Resident 55. This failure resulted in the inaccurate documentation of Resident 55's pain medication dosages and had the potential to result in decreased well-being for Resident 55. Findings: A review of Resident 55's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 55 was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to chronic kidney disease (progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right midfoot and heel (an open wound that develops on the skin). A review of Resident 55's Physician Order Summary, indicated that Resident 55 was treated under Hospice Care (also considered as palliative care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 56) was free from unnecessary medications when, Resident 56 received an antibiotic (medication used to treat infection) even though Resident 56 did not meet the criteria established for use of an antibiotic medication through the facility's antibiotic stewardship program (a set of efforts to ensure that antibiotics are used appropriately and only when necessary). This failure had the potential to result in unnecessary medication side effects for Resident 56 and had the potential to result in the development of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO; germs that have developed the ability to survive antibiotics that were previously used to kill them; decreasing antimicrobial resistance (when antibiotics become ineffective against infection) requires antimicrobial stewardship and infection prevention efforts). Findings: Review of Resident 56's SBAR [Situation Background Assessment Recommendation] Communication Form and progress note . dated 12/7/24, indicated, .[Resident 56] noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when Resident 55 received more than the prescribed dose of a narcotic pain medication (a controlled medication that is used for pain that is severe) for more than one month. This failure had the potential for a decreased quality of life and well-being for Resident 55. Findings: A review of Resident 55's admission RECORD, indicated that Resident 55 was admitted with diagnoses which included but were not limited to chronic kidney disease (progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), and non-pressure chronic ulcer of right midfoot and heel (an open wound that develops on the skin). Review of Resident 55's Physician Order Summary, dated 7/16/24, indicated, .Morphine Sulfate [a medication used for severe pain] 20 mg/ml [milligram per milliliter; units of measurement] give 0.25ml by mouth every one hour as needed for moderate pain or difficulty breathing and give 0.5ml by mouth every one hour as needed for severe pain or difficulty breathing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled, stored, and disposed of according to standards of practice for a census of 57 residents when: 1. An opened, unlabeled container of a psyllium fiber supplement (helps to bulk and soften poop, making it easier to pass) was stored in the medication cart; 2. An opened, unlabeled bottle of cough medicine was stored in the medication cart; and, 3. Medications for a discharged resident were stored in the medication cart. These unsafe medication storage practices could contribute to medication errors and unsafe medication use. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24, at 10:35 a.m., with Licensed Nurse (LN) 3, the [NAME] Unit Medication Cart Number 2 was observed. Medications for a discharged resident were observed in the medication cart lower left drawer. LN 3 stated the medications for a discharged resident should not be in the medication cart. LN 3 then removed the medications. A large container of psyllium fiber supplement was found in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe infection prevention practices were used for a census of 57 when: 1. Resident 171 was placed in a room with another resident who tested positive for RSV (Respiratory Syncytial Virus, a virus (germ) that causes infection (invasion and growth of germs in the body) of the lung and the respiratory tract) with no Droplet Isolation Precautions (hand hygiene, wearing a surgical mask, eye protection, and a gown and gloves (if contact with blood/bloody fluids is possible) are used when in contact with a person who has an infection with germs that can be spread to others by coughing, talking, or sneezing) in place on 12/15/24; and, 2. Resident 9 tested positive for RSV on 12/11/24 but was not in Droplet Isolation Precautions on 12/15/24. These failures had the potential to decrease Resident 171's health and well-being and put other residents, staff, and visitors at increased risk for infection. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 171's admission RECORD indicated that Resident 171 was admitted with diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-18 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the influenza vaccine (also known as a flu shot, a safe and effective way to protect against the influenza virus) to 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 11) when, there was no documented evidence in Resident 11's medical record that the vaccine had been offered, given, and/or refused. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 11 acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza. Findings: Review of Resident 11's admission RECORD, indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a disease of the lungs that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breath) and dementia (a general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life). Resident 11's admission record listed a conservator (a person appointed to make decisions on behalf of another person who is incapable of fully managing their own affairs due to age or physical or mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete a medication reconciliation (the process of identifying the most accurate list of all medications that the patient is taking, including name, dosage, frequency, and route) on post- discharge medications for one of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 1 was discharged home with a discontinued (no longer provided) medication. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to take an unprescribed medication in error which could negatively affect his health and well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2024 with diagnoses that included depression (a mental health condition that involves a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest that interferes with daily life) and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report, (list of physician orders) dated 6/27/24, indicated Resident 1 was prescribed Mirtazapine (medication to treat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a kitchen free of potential hazards for food borne illnesses (nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea) for 55 residents who received and ate food from the kitchen when: 1. Perishable food items in the kitchen were not properly labeled; and, 2. The inside of the ice machine contained a black like substance. These failures had the potential to result in food borne illnesses for 55 of the residents who ate food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/27/23, at 8:30 AM, with the Dietary Supervisor (DS), the large freezer was observed to have the following items without a use by date labeled on the food packages: cheese omelets (24 count), donuts (24 count), hamburger patties (6 count), and garlic (1/4 bag). The DS verified the listed food items were not labeled with a use by date. The DS stated there should have been an open date and a use by date on all opened food packages to ensure expired food items were not eaten, which could lead to the residents contracting a food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of a mental health diagnosis for 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 3 and Resident 17) based on standards of practice when: 1. Resident 3's medical record was marked with schizoaffective disorder (a mental health disorder marked by a combination symptom, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms) as a diagnosis for use of quetiapine (or Seroquel, an antipsychotic [mind altering] medication used to treat mental disease) with no prior history of such diagnosis; and, 2. Resident 17's medical record was marked with schizophrenia (a serious mental condition involving a breakdown between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception and withdrawal from reality) as a diagnosis for use of quetiapine and perphenazine (a mind-altering medication used to treat mental disease) with no prior history of such diagnosis. These failures may result in unsafe treatment and care of the residents. Findings: 1. During a record review of Resident 3's medical record titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an accurate and complete medical record for 3 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 11, Resident 19, and Resident 165) when: 1. Resident 11 and Resident 19's COVID immunization records was not readily available in their medical record, 2. Resident 165's Interdisciplinary (IDT- a care team consisting of different disciplines) care conference record was inaccurate and incomplete; and, 3. Resident 165's speech screening evaluation was not available in his record. This failures resulted in an incomplete and inaccurate medical documentation for Resident 11, Resident 19, and Resident 165. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 11's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility in June 2023. A review of Resident 19's admission Record indicated Resident 19 was admitted to the facility the beginning of November 2023. Further review of Resident 11's medical records indicated Resident 11 had no immunization for COVID on file. Further review of Resident 19's medical record indicated Resident 19 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 3, and Resident 17) when Resident 3 and Resident 17's documentation of a mental health diagnosis in the medical record was not accurately assessed. This failure resulted in Resident 3, and Resident 17's medical record with an inaccurate mental health diagnosis which could affect the care provided. Findings: 1a. During a record review of Resident 3's medical record, titled Medication Administration Record, (or MAR- a document that listed the medication use and doctor's orders) dated 11/2023, the record indicated Resident 3 was receiving a mind-altering medication called quetiapine (or Seroquel, a mind altering drug) for a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder (a mental disorder marked by a combination symptoms, such as hallucinations or delusions, and mood disorder symptoms). Further review of the Resident 3's medical record titled, History and Physical, (or H&P, a summary of medical condition upon admission to the facility) dated 10/19/22, the record written by Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 26) received proper vision treatment when Resident 26 was not seen by an ophthalmologist (a medical doctor who specializes in eye and vision care) as referred. This failure had the potential to delay care and treatment for Resident 26. Findings: During an interview on 11/28/23, at 12:15 p.m., Resident 26 stated he had an eye problem and he wanted to see a doctor. Resident 26 stated he could not see anything, and he wanted to tell the doctor that his eyes were not the same. Resident 26 stated he did not know what had happened to his eyes and he needed a doctor to help him. Resident 26 further stated the facility staff told him that there was no doctor. Review of Resident 26's nurses progress note, dated 7/9/23, indicated, Resident seen by NP [Nurse Practitioner] [Provider Name] for routine monthly routine visit. Received orders for referral to ophthalmologist. Orders noted and carried out. Review of Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment and supervision for one of two residents (Resident 2) at risk of elopement (resident leaves the premises without the facility's knowledge and supervision) when: 1. Resident 2 eloped from the facility, falling out of her wheelchair and sustaining a fractured left ankle; and, 2. Resident 2's Elopement/Wandering Risk Assessment was not assessed accurately. These failures resulted in Resident 2 not receiving additional monitoring which allowed Resident 2 to exit the facility unnoticed and sustain an accidental injury while outside the facility's premises without supervision from staff. 1. During a review of Resident 2's clinical record titled, admission RECORD, (a document that contains the resident's demographics) indicated, Resident 2's diagnosis included dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), depression (a medical illness that negatively affects how one feels or acts), and a history of falling. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary services and assistance were provided to maintain bowel and bladder continence (the ability to control movements of the bowels and bladder) for 1 of 18 sampled residents (Resident 4), when: 1. A bowel and bladder training program (a schedule of urinating and defecating to improve continence) was not developed and initiated for Resident 4 as indicated by her bowel and bladder assessment; and, 2. Resident 4's bowel and bladder assessments were not completed accurately. These failures resulted in Resident 4 using briefs (adult diapers) for urination, had the potential to not provide adequate care and a risk for further decline to Resident 4's bowel and bladder control. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 4's admission record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility in September 2023 with multiple diagnoses including fracture of right femur (leg bone), chronic kidney disease, pain in right hip. Review of Resident 4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a full time (working 40 or more hours a week) Director of Nursing (DON) onsite to fulfill the job duties of the DON. This failure had the potential to result in the needs of the residents not being adequately assessed and met in a timely manner and could potentially impact the quality of care delivered by licensed and non-licensed nursing staff for a census of 57 residents. Findings: A review of the undated facility's job description titled, JOB DESCRIPTION JOB TITLE: Director of Nursing Services, the job description indicated, .The primary purpose of .[the DON] is to plan, organize, develop and direct the overall operation of .Nursing Service Department .to ensure that the highest degree of quality care is maintained at all times .The Director of Nursing Services reports to the Administrator .DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .Develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement [QAPI; a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement] Program for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and accountable medication use, documentation, and the timely availability of medication with a census of 57 when: 1. There was a discrepancy between the Controlled Drug Record (or CDR, an accountability record for opioid use) removal and the respective Medication Administration Record (or MAR referred to as a drug chart that serves as a legal record of the drugs administered to a resident) documentation for two residents (Resident 163 and Resident 999); and, 2. Diabetic medication (medication to lower blood sugar) was not available for Resident 113. These failures had the potential risk for diversion (transfer of a medication from a legal to an illegal use from the individual for whom it was prescribed, to another person for illicit use) and could negatively impact Resident 113's blood sugar control. Findings: 1a. During a review of the facility's document titled, Controlled Drug Record, dated 11/17/23, the record indicated Resident 163's narcotic medication called Oxycodone (a pain medication)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin (a medicine to control blood sugar levels) use was documented and blood sugar monitoring was performed as ordered for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 45). These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 45's blood sugar control and monitoring. Findings: During a review of Resident 45's electronic medical record titled, Medication Administration Record, (or MAR, a legal drug chart where nurse documented medications administration), dated 11/2023, the MAR indicated a doctor's medication order for blood sugar monitoring and to give insulin when indicated per parameters three times a day. Further review of Resident 45's MAR indicated the insulin was not documented with corresponding blood sugar measurements on 11/4/23 at 6:30 a.m., 11/10/23 at 6:30 a.m., and 11/14/23 at 6:30 a.m. During a review of Resident 45's medical record titled, Weights & Vitals, (a document where blood sugar monitoring is documented) dated 11/2023, the record indicated, blood sugar measurement was not documented on 11/4/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a psychotropic (mind-altering drug) medication called lorazepam (or Ativan, an [NAME]-anxiety medication) ordered for PRN (means as needed) use had a duration and clear direction for use in 1 out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 2). This failure could result in unsafe medication use and contribute to medication error. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's medical record titled, Medication Administration Record, (or MAR, a document that listed orders for medication and nursing care), dated 11/2023, the MAR indicated the following orders: Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG .(or Ativan, an anxiety treatment medication; MG is milligram, a unit of measure); Give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for moderate anxiety and restlessness .-Start Date- 10/27/23. Lorazepam Oral Tablet 0.5 MG .; Give 1 tablet by mouth every 2 hours as needed for Severe Terminal agitation Titrate (means increase dosage) tabs 25% -100% (% is fraction of 100) every 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe medication storage practices in one out of two medication rooms (a locked room for storage of prescription, non-prescription and controlled medications) and two out of four medication carts (mobile cart that stores resident's medication and supplies) with a census of 57 when: 1. One emergency kit (or Ekit- a box that stored medication for emergency use) was opened and unsealed with no documentation of its use, 2. The medication refrigerator was frosted when medications sensitive to freezing were stored in proximity, 3. Extra supplies were placed under the sink-based cabinet in the medication storage room, 4. Staff's personal belongings were stored in the active medication storage room; and, 5. Expired (outdated) supplies and medications were stored in medication carts and hazardous liquid (medication that may pose health risk upon direct exposure to the skin and body during handling) medication was not safely labeled as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-01 · tag F0868 — isolatedHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility's quality assessment and assurance (QAA) committee failed to meet quarterly with all the required members, when the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) did not attend the second and third quarter meetings for the year of 2023. This failure had the potential for quality care improvement activities not to be evaluated and revised as needed with a possible decline in residents' quality of care. Findings: During a concurrent interview and record review on 11/30/23, at 3:49 p.m., the Administrator (ADM) stated the facility's QAA committee met monthly for Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI: a data driven and proactive approach to quality improvement) meetings rather than required quarterly to have closure view of areas needed improvement. The ADM stated the facility's QAA committee members included Medical Director (MD), ADM, IDON, Infection Preventionist (IP), Director of Staff Development (DSD), Minimum Data Set (MDS) nurse, Rehabilitation Department, Dietary Department. Facility's QAPI meetings sign-in sheets were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention measures were followed for a census of 57 when: 1. The shared glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar) and blood pressure devices (or BP, Blood Pressure, measures the pressure of blood pushing against the walls of arteries) were not cleaned and sanitized in-between resident care based on manufacturer recommendation and standards of practice; and, 2. Hand hygiene was not performed in-between resident care during the medication administration task. These failures could pose health safety risks and spread of infection in the facility. Findings: 1a. During an observation with Licensed Nurse (LN) 1, in West-2 hallway, on 11/27/23, at 11:26 AM, LN 1 gathered the blood sugar supplies including a glucometer with a lancet device (spike needle) and entered Resident 43's room. LN 1 spiked Resident 43's right thumb finger to get blood and then soaked the test strip (a disposable testing strip that helped with blood sugar measurement) attached to glucometer with blood to get the blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NAHS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAHS NORTH INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2018 |
| NAHS HOLDING INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 06/30/2018 |
| ELLIS-SHERINIAN, TAYLOR | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| ELLIS-SHERINIAN, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| LANE, JOANNE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| JOHNSON, MARC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/20/2022 |
| LUNDQUIST, VICTOR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/21/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $605K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555186. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.