Apple Valley Post-Acute Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 289 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 152 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 48% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.548 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.62 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2022-11-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality healthcare services for one of 18 sampled residents (Resident 76), when facility staff did not: 1. Utilize an accurate medication administration record (MAR, a clinical record indicating medications used by an individual, including the medication names, dosages, and administration times) that reflected the resident's current opioid regimen. Resident 76 received opioid medication orally and by intrathecal pump (e.g., continuous delivery of medication directly into the spinal cord) for pain management. 2. Administer the opioid-reversal agent Narcan, as ordered, when the resident appeared pale and sleepy on [DATE]. 3. Provide coordinated, safe physician services for pain management involving more than one physician-prescriber. These failures resulted in Resident 76 receiving higher, more frequent doses of opioid medication than expected by Physicians H and A, and a higher dose of intrathecal opioid medication than indicated by the MAR, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-11-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient licensed nurses competent to manage one resident's (Resident 76) opioid-overdoses and intrathecal (e.g., continuous delivery of medication directly into the spinal cord via a pump system) opioid-delivery system, and manage another resident's (Resident 78) chest pain, when the facility's licensed nurses: 1. Could not consistently demonstrate the process for accessing and administering the opioid-reversal agent Narcan; 2. Were not trained how to safely care for residents using an intrathecal pump to deliver medication for pain management; 3. Did not appropriately respond to Resident 78's complaints of chest pain. Resident 76 required use of oral opioid medication as well as opioid medication administered via an intrathecal pump. Twice, on 8/26/22 and 9/2/22, Resident 76 was found unconscious and transferred to an acute care hospital for emergency services. On 9/2/22, Resident 76 was pronounced dead at the hospital,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence and the right to receive services promptly for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1), when staff did not respond in a timely manner to Resident 1's repeated calls for assistance while experiencing a life-threatening medical emergency.This failure delayed access to emergency care and made Resident 1 feel frightened and ignored, and had the potential to result in severe harm including death. A review of Resident 1's admission record (facility demographic) indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left ankle fracture, diabetes mellitus (a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor healing), and congestive heart failure (a disorder which causes the heart to not pump efficiently). This document also indicated Resident 1 was her own representative.A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, a resident assessment tool) dated 6/09/26 indicated it was incomplete with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within the mandated timeframe for one resident (Resident 2) of two sampled residents when the facility submitted notification to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) on 8/25/25 when the allegation of abuse was reported to a nurse on 8/24/25.This failure decreased the facility's potential to protect residents.Findings:A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated admission to the facility on 7/17/25 with diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), mild cognitive impairment of unknown cause, and a need for assistance with personal care.A review of Resident 2's Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 7/20/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a screening tool used to monitor cognitive function (the mental processes our brain uses to perceive, learn, remember, and reason)) score of 11 which indicated moderate cognition.A review of Resident 2's progress note dated 8/24/25 at 5:25 p.m. indicated, Resident's daughter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's desire to go outdoors when one of two sampled residents, Resident 1, was asked repeatedly by multiple staff members to go inside to his room where he was in isolation for COVID-19. This failure potentially resulted in an escalation of Resident 1's anxiety prompting a call to the police and Resident 1's subsequent arrest. Finding: On 3/25/25, the Department received a report from the facility that on 3/24/25 at approximately 11:30 a.m., [Resident 1] became agitated in his covid isolation room. He exited the room using his walker without shoes or a mask on and went to exit the facility, to get fresh air and sun. As he approached the exit of the facility, the [facility] receptionist let him know he was not wearing the proper PPE (personal protective equipment) and was supposed to stay in his isolation room. Once inside, Resident 1 became significantly more agitated, 911 was called, police arrived, and after he became physical with one of the police officer, Resident 1 was arrested and escorted to the county…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold when a resident transferred to a local hospital for 1 (Resident # 78) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization. This failure resulted in a bed not being available upon discharge of the resident from the acute care hospital. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled; Bed Hold Acknowledgement/Notification, revised 03/29/2018, indicated 1. facility will issue two notices related to bed-hold: a The first notice will be given upon admission to the facility. Reissuance of the first notice would be required if the bed-hold policy under the State plan or the facility's policy were changed; b Second notice will be given at the time of transfer of a resident for hospitalization or therapeutic leave which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #78 on 09/19/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-08 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to resubmit a Level I screening for 1 (Resident #6) of 4 sampled residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR, a tool to ensure residents are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care). This failure had the potential to affect the care the resident received. Findings included: An undated facility policy titled, Preadmission Screening and Resident Review, indicated 1. The facility will obtain/complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review timely. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #6 on 11/04/2019. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of adjustment disorder (an excessive reaction to stress), bipolar disorder (disorder characterized by mood swings between depressive lows and manic highs), and dementia. An quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/09/2024, revealed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene when soiled gloves were removed and before a new pair of gloves were put on during the provision of wound care for 1 (Resident #4) 1 sampled resident reviewed for pressure ulcer/injury. This failure had the potential to cause the spread of infection between residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised 08/2019, revealed This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. The policy specified, 6. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively soap and water for the following situations: a. Before and after coming on duty; b. Before and after direct contact with residents; c. Before preparing or handling medications; d. Before performing any non-surgical invasive procedures; e. Before and after handing an invasive device; f. Before donning (putting on) sterile gloves; g. Before handing clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc.; h…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0661 — isolated
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one of two sampled residents, Resident 1, received an accurate reconciliation of medications (A process of comparing pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications by creating an accurate list of both prescription and over the counter medications that included the drug name, dosage, frequency, route, and indication for use for the purpose of preventing unintended changes or omissions at transition points in care) during her discharge, when Resident 1 received three (3) over the counter medications that were ordered for another resident, Resident 2. This failure had the potential to result in a medication error and could affect the safety and well-being of Resident 1, if she accidentally took the medications that were not ordered for her. Findings: On 7/2/2024, at 1:51 p.m., the facility's DON (Director of Nursing) provided a list of residents who were discharged in June 2024. The list included Resident 1, who was discharged on 6/7/24. During a concurrent observation and interview on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) safe from elopement (Leaving the facility without notice), when he had a history of attempting to elope from the facility and was able to walk without a wheelchair. The facility's intervention to prevent him from elopement included a wander guard (Bracelets that trigger alarms at exit monitored doors to prevent the resident from leaving unattended) placed on his wheelchair. As a result, Resident 1 eloped from the facility by foot, left the wheelchair at the facility, which did not trigger the wander guard system, fell during the process, and hitchhiked to a neighboring town 8.5 miles away. This failure had the potential to result in serious harm, including death, to Resident 1. Findings: Record review indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medical diagnoses including Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage (Bleeding in the brain, not caused by trauma), Alcohol Abuse, Metabolic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to manage two of three resident's (Resident 1 and Resident 2) pain according to professional standards of practice and resident's preferences when residents were not properly educated about their pain medication management. This failure resulted in increased pain levels and had the potential to cause a delay in recovery, impair mobility, impair mood, disturb sleep, and diminish quality of life and wellbeing. Findings: During an interview on 10/31/23, at 3:03 p.m., Resident 1 stated she had pain on the lower back, neck, and her whole body. Resident 1 stated her scheduled pain medication was not given on time. The longest she had to wait was half hour, depending on the nurse on duty. Resident 1 stated she did not like to wait because it messed up her schedule and made her pain worse. Resident 1 stated, about two weeks ago, a night shift nurse refused to give her pain medication, because the previous nurse supposedly already gave her 11 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide safety reminders, guidance, and assistance to one of four residents (Resident 1) before he tripped on a transition strip on the floor and fell while walking at the lobby of the facility. This failure resulted in Resident 1 sustaining a closed or incomplete fracture of the neck of the right thigh bone, pain, and hospitalization. Findings: A review of records indicated, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of asthma, cognitive (natural skills including attention, memory, processing speed, reasoning, planning, problem solving, and multitasking) communication deficit, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder, among other conditions. Resident 1 ' s Minimum data set (MDS – federally mandated process for clinical assessment of each resident in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes of their functional capabilities and help nursing home staff identify health problems) dated 6/3/23, indicated he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NAHS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $876K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA