Brentwood Health Care Center
1321 Franklin Street, Santa Monica, CA 90404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 59 certified beds · (310) 828-5596 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 32.5% | 10.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.5% | 4.0% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 7.3% | 1.2% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 18.6% | 7.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.2% | 13.7% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 11.1% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.3% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 82.2% | 93.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.2% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.9% | 11.2% | 12.0% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 542 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 256 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.80 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.2%CMS range 62.0–69.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.4%CMS range 10.0–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 65.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 60.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 78.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.2–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 57.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.40 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.28 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.76 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to test a tab alarm (a tab placed on wheelchair with sensors connected to the resident that will alarm when a resident stands up unassisted to help prevent falls by alerting staff) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 2).This deficient practice placed Resident 2 at risk of getting up undetected and having a fall.A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated the facility originally admitted this [AGE] year old male on 12/23/2025 and most recently on 3/27/2026 with diagnosis including type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease (long term progressive loss of kidney function), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cognitive communication deficit, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 3 (Full-thickness loss of skin dead and black tissue may be visible), benign prosthetic hyperplasia (BPH-enlarged prostate gland),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — widespreadProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent the deterioration of pressure injuries (localized damage to skin and underlying soft tissue, usually over bony prominences [heels, hips, tailbone], caused by prolonged pressure, friction, or [NAME]) and provided care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one out of three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had multiple pressure ulcers/injuries by failing to:1. Set the low air loss (LAL - a medical bed system with air-filled cells that let out tiny amounts of air through microscopic holes to keep the user's skin cool, dry, and moisture-free. It acts like a floating surface that reduces pressure on the body, actively prevents bedsores, and helps heal existing skin ulcers. They are generally adjusted to match the patient's weight) mattress to appropriate and recommended settings.2. Create individualized Care Plans (CP, is a customized, written document detailing specific health, social, and functional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Licensed nurses had specific competencies and skill sets necessary to adequately, assess, describe, and report the development of a new Pressure Ulcer (PUs- localized, pressure-related damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence), for one of the three sampled residents (Resident 1) who had a new PU to the left shin to the physician. This failure resulted in Resident 1's delay in getting treatment for the left shin unstageable (deep wound where the true depth and severity cannot be seen because it is covered by dead tissue (slough) or thick, hardened, black/brown scabs known as eschar) pressure injury which could have resulted in further deterioration of the PU, infection, sepsis, organ failure, and or death. Cross reference to F686A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the facility initially admitted the resident on 5/13/2025 and was readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis that included Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff did not store foods in the kitchen beyond their expiration date and meat was not sitting in a dark reddish liquid. This deficient practice of storing food in the kitchen beyond their expiration date and meat sitting in a dark reddish liquid may cause all residents possible serious complications from foodborne illnesses (refer to illnesses such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/01/2025 from 8:02 AM with the Dietary Services Supervisor (DSS - manages daily food service operations, ensuring safe, nutritious, and appealing meals while supervising staff, controlling budgets, and upholding health regulations), then following were identified:Grated parmesan cheese was found inside the refrigerator in its original plastic package open and stored inside a medium plastic bag with a handwritten open date of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the failed to ensure that one of two sampled resident (Resident 34) was provided with alternative meal/s that was appealing, nutritional, and appetizing. This deficient practice had the potential to result in the resident missing a meal, that could lead to weight loss. A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Malignant Neoplasm of Colon (Abnormal Cell growth in the colon (the final part of the digestive system that absorbs water, from digested food), which may lead to tumors (a lump or mass of extra cells that grow abnormally in the body) in the colon, anemia (blood disorder in which the blood has a reduced ability to carry oxygen to the rest of the body), and muscle weakness (a reduced ability to accomplish everyday tasks). A review of Resident 34's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a resident assessment tool, and care-screening tool) dated 7/1/2025, indicated that Resident 34's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the two sampled residents (Resident 9) Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a screening evaluation used to determine whether placement in a long term care facility is appropriate for the resident) Level I (a tool that helps identify possible serious mental illness and/or intellectual/development disability) assessment was accurately completed. This deficient practice of failing to accurately complete PASRR Level I assessment for Resident 9, placed Resident 9 at increased risk to not receive the necessary/appropriate care and services. Findings: During a review of Resident 9's face sheet (admission Record- a document containing demographic and diagnostic information) indicated, Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia with mood disturbance and anxiety (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and solve…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation resident preferences and choices for one out of 18 sampled residents (Resident 21). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 21 receiving bed baths instead of showers and had the potential to result in the Resident 21 inability to attain and maintain his/her highest practicable well-being with activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include but are not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive lung disease characterized by persistent and often worsening airflow limitation, which makes it hard to breathe), anemia (blood disorder in which the blood has a reduced ability to carry oxygen to the rest of the body), morbid obesity (significant amount of excess weight) abnormality of gait and mobility (deviation from a normal walking pattern, , coordination and, balance) and muscle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently honor food preferences that had been requested for one (1) out of 18 sampled Resident (Resident 51)These deficient practices had the potential to result in weight loss due to inadequate calories in residents who did not receive the correct amount or food items of their choices of their preference.A review of Resident 51's admission record indicated the Resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to Diverticulosis (small pouches or pockets in the inside walls of your intestines), liver transplant (surgery to replace a diseased liver with a healthy liver from another person), pulmonary fibrosis (scarring and thickening in your lungs that makes it hard to breathe deeply), chronic kidney disease (a long-term condition where kidneys are damaged and gradually lose their ability to filter waste and extra fluid from the blood), abnormalities of gait and mobility (deviation from a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0774 — isolatedHelp the resident with transportation to and from laboratory services outside of the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to arrange and confirm transportation to a doctor's appointment for one of three sample residents, (Resident 1). This deficient practice caused Resident 1's appointment to be changed unnecessarily. Findings: A review of the admission record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 1 on 11/16/2023 and was readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including presence of right artificial knee joint, diabetes Mellitus type 2 (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing), hyperlipemia (high fat in the blood), dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), abnormality of gait (not walking normal), obesity (overweight), vitamin D deficiency (low in vitamin D), overactive bladder (unable to control sudden urges to urinate) and obstructive sleep apnea (a sleeping disorder). A review of Resident 1's history and physical (H&P- the doctor's physical assessment and plan of care) dated 3/4/2025 indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe food storage practices in the kitchen for by failing to ensure expired canned food, corned beef hash 6-pound (lbs., unit of measurement) 12 ounce (oz, is a unit of measurement) was not stored in the same location as non-expired food to be served to residents in the food storage area along with all other canned foods not expired. The corned beef hash was expired on 10/2022. This deficient practice had the potential to result in harmful bacteria growth and the consumption of spoiled food that could lead to foodborne illness (caused by contamination of food and occur at any stage of the food production, delivery, and consumption chain) in 57 of 57 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: During an interview and a concurrent observation of the walk-in food storage area on 10/15/2024 at 7:10 AM, the Dietary Supervisor (DS) confirmed the findings and stated expired canned food should be separated from the non-expired food. Some dented cans were also observed. The DS stated the observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided dignified dining experience while assisting two of 15 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 58) during meals; by ensuring Residents 4 and 58 were fed at eye level to maintain face-to-face contact with the residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in feelings of decreased self-esteem and self-worth for Resident 4 and Resident 58). b. During a review of Resident 58's admission record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 9/26/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and muscle weakness (a lack of strength in the muscles). During a review of Resident 58's Skilled Nursing Facility admission History and Physical (H&P), dated 9/27/2024, indicated Resident 58 was recently hospitalized for acute (of sunset onset) or chronic (on going) functional decline, progressive neurologic (relating to the nervous system…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide on-going activities, based on comprehensive assessment and resident's preferences, that meets the interests and to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 57 of 57 facility Residents. This deficient practice had the potential to result in lack of feelings of well-being and meaningfulness for the resident. Cross Reference F680 Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 10/16/2024 at 11:35 a.m. Certified Nursing Assistant 6 (CNA 6) was observed seated in the facility communal dining area monitoring residents as the residents watched Television. During an interview CNA 6 stated CNA 6 was covering for the Activities Director (AD) who was on vacation starting 10/15/2024. CNA 6 stated it was CNA 6's first day covering for the AD and that CNA 6 was trained on resident activities. CNA 6 stated CNA 6 was handed a guide (name not provided) on which activities to conduct with the residents. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 11:38 a.m., the Director of Staff Development…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to create a comprehensive care plan (a resident-specific plan with defined clinical goals and interventions used to manage identified medical issues or other areas of concern) to meet the needs of two of five sampled residents (Residents 58 and 164) by failing to: -Develop a care plan for Resident 58's psychotropic (a medication that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications and their targeted behavior of visual hallucinations for Resident 58. - Develop a care plan for Resident 164's activities and anticoagulant (medication used to prevent blood clots) medication. These deficient practices placed Residents 58 and 164 at increased risk for suboptimal care from facility staff in these care areas leading to diminished physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: a. During a review of Resident 58's admission Record indicated an the facility admitted the resident on 9/26/2024 with diagnoses of dementia (a progressive state of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate monitoring of anticoagulants (blood thinner; a substance that hinders the clotting of blood) and antidepressants (medication used to treat depression [mental health that involves persistent feeling of sadness, loss of interest and low mood that lasts for a long time] for two of ten sampled residents (Resident 6 and Resident 164). These deficient practices had the potential to result in complications from the use of antidepressants and anticoagulants such as bruising, bleeding to Resident 6 and Resident 164. Findings: 1.A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted the resident on 2/13/2020 and re-admitted the resident on 11/1/2023 with diagnoses including atrial fibrillation (AFib - an irregular often rapid heart rate that commonly causes blood clots), transient ischemic attack and cerebral infarction (damage to brain tissues caused by lack of oxygen to the area). A review of the physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility document titled, Facility Verification of Informed Consent, (a principle in medical ethics, medical law, and media studies, that a patient must have sufficient information and understanding before making decisions about their medical care) form was fully completed and properly executed for psychotropic (medications that affect the mind, emotions, and behavior) medication for two of five sampled residents (Residents 58 and 164). This deficient practice had the potential for Residents 58 and 164 not to be fully informed of the risk and benefits of the psychotropic medication they were receiving. Findings: a. A review of Resident 58's admission record indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with psychotic disturbance anxiety disorder (a mental health condition with feeling of worry, anxiety, or fear interfering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment by failing to ensure a pest free environment for one of six sampled residents (Resident 214). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 214 being bitten by ants and a potential of a facility wide infestation of ants and other residents being affected by a wider infestation. Findings: A review of Resident 214's admission Record indicated Resident 214 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included, anxiety disorder, (restlessness, worried, tense, or afraid of what may happen in the future), muscle weakness (a lack of physical or muscle strength, throughout the body). A review of Resident 214's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), indicates Resident 214's cognition (the mental ability to make decisions of daily living) was intact, and can make decisions for medical care and perform all activities of daily living. During a concurrent observation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT-- a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their clients) failed to ensure that one of 13 sample residents (Resident 53) did not keep medications at the bedside without a physician's order and/or without being assessed to determine if the resident is capable to self-administer medications. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 53 keeping a white powder like substance inside the medication dispensing cup and self-applying the white powder under the breasts. This deficient also, had the potential for the white powder to be accessed and used by unintended person. Cross Reference F760 Findings: During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 53, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious medical condition that occurs when the lungs have trouble loading the blood with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the residents right to formulate an advanced directive (a legal document indicating resident preference on end-of-life treatment decisions) was recorded for two of 14 sampled residents (Residents 23 and 26). This deficient practice violated Residents 23 and 26 right to be fully informed of the option to formulate advance directives and had the potential to cause conflict with health care wishes for residents 23 and 26. Findings: During a review of Residents 23's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 23 on 3/8/2023 with diagnoses including hyperlipidemia (high level of fats in the blood), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure), and generalized muscle weakness (lack of physical or muscle strength). During a review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 9/9/2024, indicated Resident 23 had intact cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of eight sampled residents (Resident 164's) medical records had accurately documented assessment reflective of the resident's use of an anticoagulant (a substance that prevents or treats blood clots in the heart and blood vessels [tubes that carry blood throughout the body]). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 164's medical records being inaccurate and missing vital information of services being rendered to the resident. Findings: During a review of Residents 164's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 164 on 10/1/2024 with diagnoses including Major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy), atrial fibrillation (Afib- an irregular heartbeat that occurs when the electrical signals in the hearts upper chambers fire rapidly and out of synch with the lower chambers), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0680 — isolatedEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistant 6 (CNA 6) was trained and had the appropriate qualifications to serve as a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional to support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 57 of 57 residents in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential to result in a decline in the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being the 57 residents. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 10/16/2024 at 11:35 AM., CNA 6 was observed seated in the facility communal dining area monitoring residents as the residents watched Television. During an interview CNA 6 stated CNA 6 was covering for the Activities Director (AD) who was on vacation starting 10/15/2024. CNA 6 stated it was CNA 6's first day covering for the AD and that CNA 6 was trained on resident activities. CNA 6 stated CNA 6 was handed a guide (name not provided) on which activities to conduct with the residents. During an interview on 10/16/2024 at 11:38 AM., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan (a document outlining a detailed approach to care customized to an individual resident's need) with measurable goals and interventions to address care and treatment of a resident with dementia (a disorder of mental processes caused by brain disease or injury and marked by memory disorder, personality changes, and impaired reasoning) for one of one sampled resident (Resident 58). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the delivery of services to Resident 58. Finding: A review of Resident 58's admission record indicated the facility admitted Resident 58 on 9/26/2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) with psychotic disturbance anxiety disorder (a mental health condition with feeling of worry, anxiety, or fear interfering with one`s daily activities) and cognitive communication deficit (a disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate). A review of Resident 58's Physician Orders, dated 9/26/2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to obtain a physician's order and clinical indication to apply medication for one of 13 sample residents (Resident 53). This deficient practice resulted in Resident 53 applying the antifungal powder under the breasts without a physician's order and clinical indication for the antifungal powder. Cross Reference F554 Findings: During a review of the admission record indicated Resident 53, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious medical condition that occurs when the lungs have trouble loading the blood with enough oxygen and body tissues), congestive heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that involves persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a loss of interest in activities), and muscle weakness and dysphagia (medical term for swallowing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document an accurate fall risk assessment (an evaluation to determine a resident's risk for fall based on different variables) for one of three sampled residents, (Resident 1). This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk for fall(s) causing injuries or even death. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted this [AGE] year old female on 2/15/2024 with diagnoses including Osteoporosis (brittle bones) with current pathological fracture (broken bone), Atherosclerotic heart disease (thickening or hardening of the vessels that return blood back to the heart), Chronic Kidney Disease stage 4 (very decreased functioning of the kidney's ability to filter), Sick Sinus Syndrome (type of heart dysrhythmia), presence of cardiac pacemaker, Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), Essential Tremor (neurological condition that causes your hands to shake rhythmically), hearing loss left ear, history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, facility failed to ensure removal and discarding of discontinued medications for four of four sampled discharged residents (Resident 8, 9, 10 and 14) from the medication storage room per facility's policy. This deficient practice resulted in unsafe storage of the medication, and possibly Residents 8, 9, 10 and 14 inabilities to get the prescribed medications paid by residents ' insurance. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 8 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquid) and dysarthria (difficulty in speaking /slurred speech). Resident 8 was discharged on 3/23/2023. A review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 2/27/2023, indicated Resident 8 has moderately impaired cognition (mental action or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, for eight of 22 sampled residents (Resident 11, 21, 28, 29, 36, 126, 127 and 227),: 1. Inform or offer advanced directive (a written statement of a person's wishes regarding medical treatment, often including a living will, made to ensure those wishes are carried out should the person be unable to communicate them to a doctor) information, 2. Maintain a current copy of resident's advance directive in resident's clinical record 3. Followed up and provided additional information on advanced directive upon request. These deficient practices violated the residents' and/or the representatives' right to be fully informed of the option to formulate advanced directives and had the potential to cause conflict with health care wishes for Residents 11, 21, 28, 29, 36, 126, 127 and 227. Findings: A. During a review of Resident 127's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 127 on 11/25/2022 with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 10 of 10 sampled residents (Residents 6, 28, 38, 229, 7, 16, 27, 52, 57, and 127) were free from physical restraint by a. failing to ensure the use of side rails (SR) are properly assessed in the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool). b. failing to ensure the physician's order for one fourth (1/4) side rails (SR) up as enablers for mobility were applied. These deficient practices had the potential to result in entrapment and injury and residents not being treated with respect and dignity with the use of restraints. Findings: A. A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), acute respiratory failure (condition in which your blood does not get enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), and type II diabetes mellitus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a preadmission screening assessment was done for a resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission in the facility for one of one sampled resident (Resident 21). This deficient practice had the potential for not receiving the necessary and appropriate psychiatric (relating to mental illness or its treatment) level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Cross Reference: F645. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic hepatitis C (an infection caused by a virus that attacks the liver and leads to inflammation), post-traumatic stress disorder (a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and radiculopathy (injury or damage to nerve roots in the area where they leave the spine). A review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe provision of pharmaceutical services by failing to: 1. Ensure Resident 6's self-administered medication was properly stored. 2. Ensure one of two medication storage refrigerator (refrigerator 1's) temperatures were within the acceptable range. 3. Ensure proper labeling of an opened foil pack of DuoNeb (medication to treat symptoms associated with lung disease) for Resident 6. 4. Ensure ophthalmic (eye) medications were refrigerated per pharmacy for Resident 175 and 232. These deficient practices had the potential to compromise the safety and effectiveness of medications, resulting in possible medication errors. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 6's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (CKD-a longstanding disease of the kidneys leading to renal failure), acute respiratory failure (a serious condition that makes it difficult to breathe on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be treated and dignity and to self-determination for two of the 15 sampled residents when: 1. Licensed Vocational Nurse 3 (LVN 3) asked Resident 64 what was Oxycodone (controlled strong pain medication) the maximum dose per day. 2. Resident 4 (female) shared a bathroom with male residents. As a result, Resident 67 felt uncomfortable and Resident 4 felt bad and disgusted every time she had to use the bathroom. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dislocation of internal right hip prosthesis (when the ball of the new hip implant comes out of the socket), history of falling, and insomnia (a common sleep disorder where you may have trouble falling asleep, staying asleep, or getting good quality sleep). A review of Resident 4's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care screening tool) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to ensure that the residents and/or responsible party (RP) were informed in advance, of the risks and benefits of psychoactive medication (a drug that changes brain function and results in alterations in perception, mood, consciousness, or behavior) for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 38). This deficient practice violated the residents' right to make an informed decision regarding the use of psychoactive medications. Findings: A review of Resident 38's admission record indicated Resident 1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a general term for the impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), anxiety (a feeling of fear, dread, and uneasiness. It might cause you to sweat, feel restless and tense, and have a rapid heartbeat), and encephalopathy (any disease that affects the whole brain and alters its structure or how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a preadmission screening assessment was completed for one of threee sampled residents (Resident 21), who was diagnosed with a mental illness prior to admission in the facility. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 21 not receiving the necessary and appropriate psychiatric (relating to mental illness or its treatment) level of treatment and evaluation in the facility. Cross Reference: F641. Findings: A review of Resident 21's admission Record indicated Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including chronic hepatitis C (an infection caused by a virus that attacks the liver and leads to inflammation), post-traumatic stress disorder (a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event), and radiculopathy (injury or damage to nerve roots in the area where they leave the spine). A review of Resident 21's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that met the care/services based on the resident's individual assessed needs for four of 35 sampled residents (Residents 6, 16, 28 and 38) by failing to ensure: 1. Comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented for Resident 16's levetiracetam (medication to treat seizure [a sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain]) use. 2. Residents 6, 28 and 38 had the proper care plan for bed side rails per physician order. These deficient practices had the potential to result negative impact on Residents 6, 16, 28 and 38's health and safety, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings: 1. A review of Resident 16's admission Record, indicated the facility admitted Resident 16 on 9/13/2023 with diagnoses including osteoporosis (a condition in which bones become weak and brittle), Alzheimer's disease (a progressing brain disorder that destroys memory and other important mental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 9) psychoactive medication clonazepam (klonopin- a long-acting benzodiazepine with intermediate onset commonly used to treat panic disorders, severe anxiety, and seizures) 1. Was necessary to treat a specific diagnosis and documented condition. 2. Pharmacist recommendations were followed. This deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 9 at risk of receiving unnecessary medication. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential hypertension (high blood pressure that is multi-factorial and doesn't have one distinct cause with above-normal blood pressure is typically anything over 120/80), malignant neoplasm of prostate (Prostate cancer is cancer that occurs in the prostate. The prostate is a small walnut-shaped gland in males that produces the seminal fluid), and radiculopathy, lumber…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate setting of the low air loss mattress (LAL-a mattress designed to prevent and treat pressure wounds) was properly set up for two of two sampled residents, (Residents 38 and 57) according to the residents' needs and professional standard of care. This deficient practice placed Residents 38 and 57 at risk of poor wound healing of the current pressure ulcer (skin and soft tissue injuries that form as a result of constant or prolonged pressure exerted on the skin) and had a potential to develop new pressure sores/wounds. Findings: A. A review of Resident 38's admission record indicated Resident 38 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs) metabolic encephalopathy (a disease in which the functioning of the brain is affected by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Personal Alarms, for one of 22 sampled residents, (Resident 28) who are at risk for falls. This deficient practice placed Resident 28 at risk for fall and sustain an accidental injury. Findings: A review of Resident 28's admission Record indicated Resident 28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including intervertebral disc degeneration (when the spinal disks wear down), unspecified dementia (loss of cognitive functioning-thinking, remembering, and reasoning) and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). A review of Resident 28's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 10/17/2023, indicated Resident 28's cognitive skills for daily decision-making were severely impaired and required maximal assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs- oral hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure resident received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections (UTI-an infection in any part of your urinary system your kidneys, ureters, bladder and urethra) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 177) by failing to ensure Resident 177's indwelling urinary (foley) catheter (a flexible plastic tube inserted into the bladder that remains there to provide continuous urinary drainage) was placed below the level of the bladder at all times. This deficient practice had the potential to result in urinary tract infections for Resident 177. This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 177 to be at risk for complications related to indwelling catheters such as UTI. Findings: A review of Resident 177's admission Record indicated resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes mellitus (DM-a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of 15 sampled residents (Residents 11 and 36) were accurately assessed and monitored by failing to: 1. Identify and assess prevent unplanned significant weight loss of 11.4 pounds (lbs) (6.8 percent) in 9 days for Resident 11. 2. Ensure Resident 36 who was on a fluid restriction, received the daily fluids per physician's order and resident's care plan. These deficient practices resulted in Resident 11 having unplanned significant weight loss of 11.4 pounds in 10 days and placed her at a risk for malnutrition; it also had the potential to cause either fluid overload or dehydration for Resident 36. Findings: A. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypothyroidism (the thyroid gland [butterfly-shaped gland in the front of the neck] does not produce adequate thyroid hormones to meet the body's needs), overactive bladder (OAB-causes a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to effectively manage pain for one of 15 sampled residents (Resident 64) by not following physician's medication order. This deficient practice resulted in Resident 64 experienced unnecessary pain. Findings: A review of Resident 64's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including displaced fracture (break in bone) in left tibia (also known as the shinbone or shank bone in the leg below the knee), and fracture of left lower leg, depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and sciatica (pain, weakness, numbness, or tingling in the leg). A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a comprehensive assessment and care screening tool), dated 10/30/2023, indicated Resident 64's cognitive (mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding) skills for daily decision-making were intact. Resident 64 required supervision to moderate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the 22 sampled residents (Resident 9) psychoactive medication clonazepam (klonopin- a long-acting benzodiazepine with intermediate onset commonly used to treat panic disorders, severe anxiety, and seizures [is a burst of uncontrolled electrical activity between brain cells that causes temporary abnormalities in muscle tone or movements, behaviors, sensations or states of awareness]), by failing to ensure: 1. Klonopin was necessary to treat a specific diagnosis and the condition documented. 2. The Pharmacist's recommendations were followed. These deficient practice had the potential to place Resident 9 at risk of receiving unnecessary medication. Findings: A review of Resident 9's admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential hypertension (high blood pressure that is multi-factorial and doesn't have one distinct cause with above-normal blood pressure is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five sampled residents (Resident 7's) psychotropic (relating to or denoting drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication regimen was managed and monitored to promote or maintain the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being by failing to ensure: 1. The implementation of monitoring episodes of anxiety for Resident 7's alprazolam (anti-anxiety medication) use. 2. The implementation of monitoring for any potential side effect and/or adverse reaction for Resident 7's alprazolam use. 3. The implementation of monitoring episodes of depression for Resident 7's citalopram hydrobromide (anti-depressant medication) use. 4. The implementation of monitoring for any potential side effect and/or adverse reaction for Resident 7's citalopram hydrobromide use. 5. Ensure Resident 7's citalopram hydrobromide use had indicated manifestation of behavior specific for the diagnosis. These deficient practices had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical record in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for one of 22 sampled residents (Resident 33) by failing to ensure Resident 33's change of condition documentation on 10/25/2023 was documented via late entry. Resident 33 was transferred to an acute care hospital (GACH) on 10/24/2023. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively impact the delivery of service given to Resident 33. Findings: A review of Resident 33's admission Record indicated the facility originally admitted Resident 33 on 8/31/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including sepsis (a life-threatening condition that arises when the body's response to infection causes injury to its own tissues and organs), urinary tract infection (UTI-a bacterial infection of the bladder and associated structures). admission Record also indicated Resident 33 was transferred to GACH on 10/24/2023. A review of Resident 33's Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-25 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of one sampled emergency crash cart (set of trays, drawers or shelves on wheels used in a medical facility for transporting and dispensing emergency equipment at site for life support protocols): 1. Ensure crash cart was readily available; Registered Nurse 1 (RN 1) did not know the code and/or which key to use when opening the emergency crash cart. 2. Ensure crash cart log was checked and updated on a daily basis and as needed. These deficient practices had the potential of delayed provisions of emergency care for all the current residents who wishes to have full treatment in a life-threatening situation. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview with RN 1 on 10/24/2023 at 10:10 a.m., observed missing crash cart checks on the following dates: 9/22/2023; 9/23/2023; 9/29/2023; 9/30/2023; 10/6/2023; 10/7/2023; 10/20/2023; 10/21/2023; 10/22/2023; 10/23/2023; and 10/24/2023. RN 1 stated and verified missing check. RN 1 was unable to open the crash cart and stated not knowing the code…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of three sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 and 5) by failing to: 1. Implement a comprehensive and resident-centered care plan regarding Resident 1 and 2's peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line-type of catheter that is placed in a large vein that allows to give medications intravenously [IV-given via vein]). 2. Develop and implement a resident-centered care plan when Resident 5 refused COVID-19 (a viral infection, highly contagious, that easily transmits from person to person, causing respiratory problems and may cause death) vaccination. These deficient practices had the potential to fail during the delivery of necessary care and services to Residents 1, 2 and 5. Findings: 1a. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), right hip stage 4 pressure ulcer (injury…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-09-03 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of four sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) with Intravenous (IV-given via vein) catheter was provided safe care to prevent complications. Residents 1 and 2 had a Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC line-type of catheter that is placed in a large vein that allows to give medications intravenously) line and the dressing was not changed per facility's policy. This deficient practice had the potential to place Residents 1 and 2 at risk for developing complications such as inflammation of the vein and infection. Findings: a. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), right hip stage 4 pressure ulcer (injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue) and Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements). A review of Resident 1's Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-03 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that COVID-19 (a viral infection, highly contagious, that easily transmits from person to person, causing respiratory problems and may cause death) booster vaccination was consented properly and complete, educated upon refusals with documentation when offered to one of eight sampled residents (Resident 5). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 5's COVID-19 infection. Findings: During a review of Resident 5's admission Record, indicated that Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including myocardial infarction (heart attack), hypertension (HTN - elevated blood pressure) and dementia (a chronic or persistent disorder of the mental processes caused by brain disease). During a review of Resident 5's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a standardized assessment and care-screening tool), dated 8/19/2023, the MDS indicated Resident 5 had a moderately impaired cognition (thought processes) for daily decision making and with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-21 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) within 48 hours of resident's admission. This deficient practice had the potential for delayed administration of necessary care and services. Findings: A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident 1 on 8/4/2023, with diagnoses including convulsion ( a sudden, irregular movement of the body), and muscle weakness. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS- a standardized assessment and screening tool) dated 8/9/2023, indicated the resident had intact cognition (decisions consistent/reasonable). The MDS indicated the resident was independent with bed mobility, transfer, toilet use, dressing, and walking. However, she required supervision as it relates to her personal hygiene. A review of Resident 1`s Assessments on 8/19/2023 at 9:25 AM, indicated the base line care plan was not completed and the status showed in progress. A further review of the assessments indicated that Safety Device/Mobility Device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NAHS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAHS HOLDING INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2018 |
| ELLIS-SHERINIAN, JAMES | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| WEAVER, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/31/2023 |
| BAJA, RALPH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2023 |
| BARLOW, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/29/2018 |
| MOORE, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2022 |
| PAULSEN, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/29/2018 |
| WALTON, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 06/29/2018 |
| JOHNSON, MARC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/20/2022 |
| LUNDQUIST, VICTOR | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/21/2018 |
| TRAN, HONG-PHUC | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/29/2026 |
| EDWARD BEGLEY | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $646K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055711. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.