Woodcrest Post Acute & Rehabilitation
8133 Magnolia Avenue, Riverside, CA 92504 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (951) 688-4321 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,500 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-26)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 1.8% | 10.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.3% | 4.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.4% | 1.2% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.3% | 7.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 2.9% | 9.8% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 13.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 98.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 2.6% | 10.2% | 21.2% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.0% | 12.0% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.3% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.3% | 93.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.5% | 23.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.5% | 11.2% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.89 | 2.25 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.98 | 1.57 | 1.80 | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
44.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 70 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 33.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 44.8%CMS range 34.4–56.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 8.1–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 33.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 33.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 23.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.8–12.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.42 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.64 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of one of three sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for falls, when the facility failed to repair a loose toilet seat being used by Resident 3 after it was reported to staff as needing repair on April 2, 2024. This failure resulted in Resident 3 falling off the loose toilet seat and sustaining a broken hip that required surgical repair at the general acute care hospital (GACH). Findings: On April 23, 2024, at 12:37 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 3. Resident 3 was in his room, lying in bed, alert and conversant. Resident 3 stated, he fell in the restroom on April 3, 2024, at approximately 2:30 p.m. Resident 3 stated he was going to use the toilet, and as he was sitting down, he placed one of his hands on the toilet seat and the toilet seat moved sideways which caused him to fall to the ground. Resident 3 stated he had spoken to the Social Service Assistant (SSA) about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-20 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary discharge planning was provided according to the facility's policy and procedure, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1), when Resident 1's family member (FM) was not informed of the resident's current functional limitations, required level of care, and if the FM was capable of providing care to Resident 1, prior to discharging back to home.This failure resulted in Resident 1 being discharged home and the FM could not provide the required assistance in ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). This failure had the potential for Resident 1's overall health condition to be affected and further decline in ADLs.Findings:On April 1, 2026, at 9:18 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate issues regarding discharge.On April 1, 2026, a review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included fracture (break in the bone) of the right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-01-09 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
F814 Dispose Garbage and Refuse ProperlyBased on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure two of two dumpster bin lids were fully closed.This failure had the potential to cause insects and rodents infestation in the facility and potential for food borne illness.Findings:On January 5, 2026, at 10:03 a.m., during concurrent observation and interview with the Dietary Service Supervisor (DSS), the dumpster was overloaded with garbage bags and the cover was open about a foot and a half. The DSS stated the dumpster was not fully covered. The DSS further stated the dumpsters should be covered to prevent insects and rodents' infestation.On January 8, 2026, at 11:23 a.m., during concurrent observation of picture of the dumpster and interview with the Registered Dietician (RD), the RD stated there were a lot of bags, and the lids were open. The RD further stated that the dumpster lids should be covered, and the main objective is to keep the rodents out.A review of the facility policy titled, .Garbage and Trash, dated 2023, indicated .Garbage and trashcan must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided, for two of 28 sample residents (Residents 83 and 100), when:1. Resident 83's refusal of medications was not addressed including identifying the reason for refusal, providing education and interventions, and evaluating the resident's response. There was no consistent documented evidence the physician was notified timely of Resident 83's refusal of medications.This failure had the potential to result in a delay in timely provision of care for Resident 83 and could contribute to complications related to medication not administered.2. Resident 100's abnormal laboratory (Hemoglobin A1C [HgbA1C - measures average blood sugar levels over the past 2-3 months]) result on October 16, 2025, was not addressed according to the facility's policy and procedure.This failure had the potential for Resident 100 to have uncorrected hyperglycemia (elevated blood sugar levels), and experience the side effects of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services were provided to meet the needs of the residents when:1. For Resident 76, a discontinued controlled substance (CS) was not removed from active medication storage, tablets continued to be removed from inventory after the physician order was discontinued. In addition, the documentation on the controlled drug record (CDR - medication count sheet, an inventory record used to document the receipt, use, and count of controlled substances) did not reconcile with the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the CS was administered after the CS was discontinued; and2. For Resident 120, documentation on the CDR did not reconcile with the MAR.These failures resulted in inaccurate accountability of controlled substances, which had the potential for diversion (medication taken by someone other than for whom it is prescribed) or misuse of controlled substances and had the potential to compromise…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders and the facility's policies and procedures, when a medication error rate of 20% was identified, with five medication errors out of 25 medication administration opportunities during medication pass observations for three of five residents observed (Residents 22, 61, and 110).These failures included administration of incorrect medication, incorrect dosage form, and incorrect dose, which had the potential to compromise residents' medication therapy and safety. Findings:1. On January 5, 2026, at 9:33 a.m., during a medication administration observation with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 2, LVN 2 was observed preparing and administering seven medications to Resident 22, including a red round multivitamin (MVI - supplement) tablet and an aspirin (used to prevent blood clots) 81 mg (milligram - unit of measurement) chewable tablet.A review of Resident 22's physician orders indicated the following: - Multivitamin-Minerals Oral Tablet (Multiple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were implemented, for five out of nine residents reviewed for infection control practices when:1.For Resident 61, 110, and 111, nursing staff did not clean and disinfect shared medical equipment, wrist blood pressure (BP) monitor with an attached cuff, before and after each use, in accordance with the facility's infection control policy; 2.One housekeeper (HK) did not perform hand hygiene after removing PPE (personal protective equipment- like gowns, gloves, masks, worn to minimize exposure to hazards) used while cleaning an EBP (enhanced barrier precautions- infection control measures, primarily for nursing homes, that mandate gowns and gloves for healthcare workers during high-contact resident care to prevent the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms) room (room [ROOM NUMBER]); and3.The facility failed to follow the facility's standards of practice when a nasal cannula (a medical device used to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fingernail care, for one of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident 94), when her fingernails were observed to be long, yellowish, and with black residue underneath the fingernails.This failure had the potential to result in an increased risk of infection and injury due to unclean fingernails.Findings:On January 5, 2026, at 2:50 p.m., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 94 in her room. Resident 94 was observed to have long, yellowish fingernails on both hands and with black residue observed under three fingernails on her left hand. Resident 94 stated fingernail care was not provided recently and wanted her fingernails to be cut and cleaned.A review of Resident 94's admission Record, dated January 8, 2026, indicated Resident 94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included heart failure.A review of Resident 94's Care Plan, dated November 7, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the physician orders for oxygen administration, for two of two residents reviewed for oxygen (Residents 21 and 58), when:These failures had the potential to place Residents 21 and 58 at risk for adverse reactions from over-oxygenation.Findings:1.On January 5, 2026, at 3:06 p.m., an observation was conducted in Resident 21's room. Resident 21 was observed using oxygen at five (5) lpm (liters per minute - unit of measurement) via (through) a nasal cannula (NC).A review of Resident 21's admission Record, dated January 8, 2026, indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a lung condition making it difficult to breathe).A review of Resident 21's history and physical, dated March 17, 2025, indicated Resident 21 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions.A review of Resident 21's Physician Orders, dated May 27, 2025, indicated, .OXYGEN VIA NC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff were able to carry out the functions of food and nutrition services safely and effectively when: 1.Cook (CK) 1 did not know how to fully test the minced and moist texture (Minced & Moist foods are soft and moist but with no liquid that can leak or drip from the food and no crumbs), based on the standards of practice. This failure had the potential for risk of choking for six residents who had dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and received minced and moist diet from the kitchen during the lunch meal on January 7, 2026.2. [NAME] (CK) 2 could not articulate the proper cool down process for ambient food (food kept at room temperature 70 F).3.A Dietary Aide (DA) did not follow manufacturer's guideline for the length of time for testing the red bucket Quaternary (Quat) sanitizer (sanitizing solution used for sanitizing food contact surfaces). These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illnesses for 111 residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 50), the facility failed to ensure a change of condition was identified when Resident 5 had a decline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) requiring total assistance in eating on July 18 and 19, 2025, and the meal intake was 50% or below on July 19, 2025.This failure had the potential to contribute to a delay in the care and treatment to address Resident 5's change of condition and affect the resident's overall health condition. Findings:On August 11, 2025, at 10:21 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint regarding quality of care issue.On August 12, 2025, Resident 5's record was reviewed. Resident 5's admission Record, indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar) and heart failure.A review of Resident 5's Progress Notes, documented by the physician,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with the facility's policy and procedures and physician's order, for four of four residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4).This failure has the potential to result in reduced effectiveness of Residents 1, 2,3, and 4's medications.On July 16, 2025, at 5:06 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate quality of care issues.On July 16, 2025 at 5:23 a.m., during an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, she stated she started the 6 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. medication pass (med pass - the process through which medication is administered to residents) at 4:20 a.m. LVN 1 stated she should start med pass at 5 a.m. but she started 40 minutes early because there were a lot of blood sugar checks, medications to be administered through G-tubes (gastrostomy tube - a tube inserted to the stomach used to give food and medications) and documentation to complete. LVN 1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident A) received a post-discharge plan of care, which contained the necessary information for the continuation of care after discharge. This failure resulted in Resident A ' s family calling the facility for advice and sending Resident A to the emergency room, within 24 hours of his discharge from the facility. Findings: On March 28, 2025, at 9:50 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate quality of care concern and discharge rights. On March 28, 2025, at 1 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Social Service Assistant (SSA). The SSA stated the case managers and social service director are the ones who help the residents plan for discharge and follow up care. The SSA stated Resident A was discharged on March 18, 2025, and she called Resident A twice following his discharge, but she did not speak with Resident A. On March 28, 2025, at 1:10 p.m., an interview was conducted with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat with respect and dignity, for two of five residents (Residents A and B), when the facility left a deceased resident (Resident C) in the same room with Residents A and B for approximately 12 hours, before removing the body. This failure resulted in Residents A and B ' s experiencing negative psychosocial (a person ' s well-being- mental, emotional, social, and spiritual health) outcomes. Findings: On [DATE], at 9:05 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate a complaint of resident rights. On [DATE], at 9:50 a.m., Resident C's bed was observed to be not made up and the sheets were dirty. Two wheelchair footrests were observed on top of the bed. On [DATE], at 10:00 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident B. Resident B stated Resident C passed away early in the morning of [DATE], and the Resident C's body was left in the room until 7:30 p.m., that night. Resident B stated, it was a very traumatic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to answer the call light within a reasonable time for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 5, 6, and 7). This failure had the potential to result in needs not to be met efficiently for Residents 5, 6, and 7. Findings: 1.On October 13, 2024, Resident 5 ' s electronic record was reviewed. Resident 5 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included osteoarthritis- right hip (type of arthritis when the cartilage that lines the joint is worn down), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle tissue and strength) and history of falling. On November 13, 2024, at 3:36 p.m., a telephone interview was conducted with Resident 5's family representative (FR 3). The FR stated Resident 5 called the family some weeks ago and stated she (Resident 5) pushed her call light button for assistance to the restroom and no one responded. 2. On November 13, 2024, Resident 6 ' s electronic record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted on [DATE], with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — widespreadPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of Level I preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) for 2 (Resident #3 and Resident #59) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for PASARR requirements. Findings included: A facility policy titled, admission Criteria, revised in 09/2023, revealed, 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. The policy revealed, a. The facility will ensure PASARR screen has been completed by hospitals or facility of origin for all potential admissions, regardless of payer source, to determine if the individual meets the criteria for a MD, ID or RD. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #3 on 06/16/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of dementia (onset 06/16/2024), schizophrenia (onset 06/16/2024), and major depressive disorder (onset…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the appropriate state-designated authority after a resident was diagnosed with a new mental illness for 1 (Resident #59) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) requirements. Findings included: An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #59 on 12/15/2023. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of psychosis (onset 12/15/2023) and major depressive disorder (onset 12/15/2023). The admission Record revealed the resident received a diagnosis of schizophrenia on 12/29/2023. An quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/22/2024, revealed Resident #59 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated the resident had intact cognition. The MDS indicated the resident had active diagnoses to include psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. Resident #59's care plan included a focus area initiated 12/25/2023, that indicated the resident had a mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was 5% or less. This was evidenced by two medication errors out of 33 opportunities, which resulted in a medication error rate of 6.06%, that affected 2 (Resident #10 and Resident #39) of 5 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Administering Oral Medications, revised in 09/2023, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of oral medications. The policy further revealed, Steps in the Procedure included 5. Select the drug from the unit dose drawer or stock supply. 6. Check the label on the medication and confirm the medication name and dose with the MAR [medication administration record]. 1. An admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #10 on 01/10/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of unspecified anemia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered on time as prescribed by the physician and according to the facility ' s policy for three of three residents reviewed (Residents 1, 2, and 3). This failure had the potential to result in an increased risk of changes of condition to Residents 1, 2 and 3. Findings: On August 12, 2024, at 9:20 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate a complaint. On August 12, 2024, at 9:49 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 1, Resident 1 was in his room, sitting on his wheelchair by the door, alert and conversant. Resident 1 stated he received his medications on time, but he looked for the nurse when it ' s time for his pain medication. On August 12, 2024, at 10:04 a.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 2, Resident 2 was lying on his bed, watching television, alert and conversant. Resident 2 stated he received his medications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staffing to provide care and services for the residents of the facility. This failure had the potential to cause residents in the facility to experience delays and inadequate care. Findings: On July 23, 2024, at 5:06 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility. On July 23, 2024, at 5:26 a.m., during an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated the facility needed more staffing so they can be able to do their work effectively for the residents. On July 23, 2024, at 5:58 a.m. during an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated there had been staffing issues at the facility. LVN 1 stated there was one night shift (11-7) when there was only four CNAs on the floor. LVN 1 stated they tried to get coverage, but nobody wanted to work. LVN 1 further stated that they are always short-staffed, weekday or weekend. On July 23, 2024, at 5:50 a.m. during an interview with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-15 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure updated staffing information of the total number and actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff was posted in a prominent place readily available to residents and visitors. This failure had the potential for the facility not to be able to provide and determine the actual nursing hours required for the provision of care and services for the residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation on July 15, 2024, at 9:34 a.m., the facility document titled, Census and Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD - used to measure the duration of care residents receive in a day) was posted on the wall of the facility lobby next to the receptionist's desk. The DHPPD information was not updated. The DHPPD forms did not indicate the actual total direct care service hours, actual total CNA (certified Nursing Assistant) direct care service hours, the average patient census, the actual DHPPD and the actual CNA DHPPD on multiple dates. During a concurrent interview and record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of three residents, Resident 2, had the call light within her reach. This failure had the potential to result for Resident 2 to not be able to call for help. Findings: On June 24 and 25, 2024, unannounced visits were conducted at the facility. On June 24, 2024, at 2:25 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 2, Resident 2 was lying in bed and alert. Resident 2 was mouthing words and her responses were unclear. Resident 2 was observed moving her left hand towards her right side. Resident 1 nodded her head up and down when asked if she needed help. Resident 2 ' s call light was found hanging on the TV mount of her roommate by Resident 2 ' s right hand-side. On June 24, 2024, at 2:27 p.m., during an interview with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 stated Resident 2 ' s call light was not within her reach. CNA 1 stated, Resident 2 will not be able to ask for help if the call light was not within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of two residents, Resident 1, that the responsible party (RP) was notified when Resident 1 had a change of condition (COC) and was transferred out to a general acute care hospital (GACH). This failure resulted in Resident 1 ' s RP to not be aware of Resident 1 ' s health condition. Findings: On June 24 and 25, 2024, unannounced visits were conducted at the facility. On June 25, 2024, at 10:48 a.m., during an interview with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated the doctor, family members or responsible party were notified when a resident had a COC. On June 25, 2024, at 3:30 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated the staff should notify the doctor and RP when a resident had a COC. The DON stated the RP should be notified as well when a resident was sent out to the hospital. A review of Resident 1 ' s admission Record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure, for one of one resident, Resident 1, that a physician ' s order for physical therapy was communicated with the hospice (care that focuses on the comfort and quality of life rather than curing a disease) provider. This failure resulted for Resident 1 not receiving physical therapy as ordered by the physician. In addition, this failure resulted for the hospice provider to not be fully aware of Resident 1 ' s overall condition. Findings: On June 24 and 25, 2024, unannounced visits were conducted at the facility. On June 24, 2024, at 2:01 p.m., during a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 1, Resident 1 was observed in her room, lying in bed, alert and conversant. Resident 1 stated she required assistance with activities of daily living. A review of Resident 1 ' s medical record was conducted. Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included supraventricular tachycardia (irregular heartbeat)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-11 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR - a way to help a person who has stopped breathing, and whose heart may have stopped beating, to stay alive) for one of two sampled residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1 was found unresponsive. This failure resulted in Resident 1 not receiving the necessary life saving measures. Findings: On [DATE], and 10, 2024, unannounced visits were conducted at the facility to investigate an allegation of neglect. A record review of Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation and hypertension. A review of Resident 1's History and Physical indicated that Resident 1 has the capacity to understand and make decisions. A review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1 was a full code (full support which includes cardiopulmonary resuscitation-CPR, if the patient has no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided to meet the needs of the residents when four medications were not administered during the scheduled time with no documentation for one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to receive inadequate, ineffective medication treatment. Findings: On May 24, 2024, at 9:35 a.m., Resident 1 was interviewed. Resident 1 was alert and oriented. Resident 1 stated she had missed some medication doses of apixaban (Eliquis - an anticoagulant) and amiodarone (for arrhythmias - irregular heartbeats). On May 24, 2024, at 9:35 a.m., Resident 1's medical record was reviewed. Resident 1 was re-admitted at the facility on January 10, 2024, with diagnoses which included tachycardia (fast, irregular heart rate), cardiac arrest, severe obesity, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). There was a physician order dated January 30, 2024, for the following medications to be given to Resident 1: amiodarone 200 mg by mouth every 12 hours for arrhythmia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate preparation and orientation for a safe and orderly discharge was afforded to one of two sampled residents (Resident 2) and her family member. Resident 2 was living with a family member, who was not provided adequate preparation and orientation prior to the planned discharge. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to have an increased risk of accidents and rehospitalization if she was discharged from the facility. Findings: On April 23, 2024, at 10:45 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility to investigate an issue on discharge and transfer. On April 23, 2024, at 10:53 a.m., a concurrent interview and observation was conducted with Resident 1. Resident 1 was sitting on her wheelchair, watching television, alert, and conversant. Resident 1 stated she told the staff she wanted to go home by the end of February 2024. Resident 1 stated she was not able to go home last February 29, 2024, because her family member was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the family member (FM), who was designated as the Power of Attorney (POA- a legal document that allows someone else to act on your behalf), was notified about a change of condition, for one of two residents, Resident 2. This failure resulted for Resident 2's FM to not be aware of Resident 2's change in condition and the inability to fulfill POA duties effectively. Findings: On April 4, 2024, an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for an investigation of a complaint. A review of Resident 2's records was conducted. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 passed away at the facility on February 17, 2024. Resident 2's, History and Physical (H&P), dated August 21, 2023 indicated Resident 2 had diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar level) with ulcer (break on the skin) of right foot , end stage renal disease (a permanent kidney failure) on dialysis (a procedure to remove waste products…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care according to professional standards of practice for Resident 1 and 2, when the facility failed to: 1. Initiate a care plan, document a Change of Condition (COC), and complete a weekly skin assessment, for Resident 1 ' s stage 2 (shallow, open), coccyx (tailbone), Pressure Injury (PI – Damaged skin integrity due to prolonged pressure). 2. a) Complete a weekly skin assessment on Resident 2 ' s stage 2, coccyx PI; b) Carry over a doctor ' s (Dr ' s) order of Calmoseptine cream (Moisture barrier that helps heal skin) to Residents 2 ' s Treatment Administration Record (TAR); and c) Follow-up on Resident 2 ' s urine culture results from the General Acute Care Hospital (GACH) following treatment for sepsis related to a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). These failures had the potential for changes in Resident 1 and 2 ' s PIs to go unidentified and the potential for a delay of treatment for Resident 1 and 2's PI's, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) was being repositioned in accordance with the care plan. In addition, the facility failed to ensure treatment for the left heel pressure injury was provided in accordance with the physician order. These failures had the potential for Resident 1 to develop pressure injury or can result in worsening of an existing pressure injury. Findings: On December 28, 2023, at 10:30 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate quality of care issues. A review of Resident 1's medical records indicated he was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included pneumonia, (infection in the lungs), atrial fibrillation, (irregular heartbeat), acute respiratory failure, (a serious condition that develops quickly without warning when the lungs can ' t get enough oxygen into the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus, (a chronic condition that affects the way the body uses sugar. The body either resists…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the basis for discharge of a resident endangering others were documented as necessary by one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) physician. This failure has the potential to place the resident at risk for inappropriate discharge which could negatively affect the psychosocial needs of Resident 1. Findings: On December 6, 2023, at 9:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of a complaint. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), hyperlipidemia (elevated cholesterol and/or triglycerides) and unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). A review of Resident 1's History and Physical, dated August 2, 2023, indicated the resident can make needs known…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-23 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was permitted to return following hospitalization unless the needs cannot be met, or the resident's behavior posed a danger to other residents at the facility. This failure had the potential to affect continuity of care for a resident who lived and received services from staff familiar to his needs. The resident has a diagnosis of dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). The resident had to be placed to another skilled nursing facility. Findings: On December 6, 2023, at 9:15 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted at the facility for the investigation of a transfer and discharge concern. A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), hyperlipidemia (elevated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five residents reviewed (Resident 1) was free from abuse when Resident 2 grabbed her breast. This failure had the potential for other residents in the facility to experience inappropriate sexual behavior from Resident 2. Findings: On October 9, 10, and 26, 2023, unannounced visits were conducted to investigate a facility reported incident. During a review of Resident 1's admission Record (AR), the AR indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss) and hypertension (high blood pressure). During a review of Resident 1's History and Physical (H&P), dated August 4, 2023, the H&P indicated Resident 1 did not have the capacity to understand and make decisions. During a review of Resident 2's AR, the AR indicated Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia and hypertension. During a review of Resident 2's H&P, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy and procedure on abuse investigation when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1 was not suspended after an allegation of verbal abuse was made by one of three residents reviewed (Resident 1). This failure resulted in CNA 1 to continue caring for other residents exposing residents at risk for potential harm. Findings: On October 12, 2023, at 10:06 a.m., an unannounced visit was conducted to the facility to investigate one Facility Reported Incident related to an allegation of abuse by Resident 1 on CNA 1. During a review of Resident 1's record on October 12, 2023, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a mental illness) and depressive disorder. Resident 1's history and physical dated July 28, 2023, indicated resident was able to make her needs known and able to care for herself. The Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - an assessment tool) dated August…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of missing money to the State Survey Agency within 24 hours for one of four residents, (Resident 2). This failure increased the risk for further misappropriation due to delayed notification to respond and advocate on behalf of Resident 1. Findings: On August 2, 2023, at 11:48 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of misappropriation of property. Resident 2 ' s History and Physical dated October 24, 2022, indicated he could make needs known but could not make medical decisions. On August 2, 2023, at 2:13 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident 2. Resident 2 stated his wallet went missing and $400.00 was stolen. Resident 2 was unable to recall the date or time this occurred. Resident 2 stated the police came to investigate, and again was unable to recall the date or time. On August 2, 2023, at 4:05 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Licensed Vocational Nurse, (LVN). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who have a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) for one of four residents (Resident 1), when Resident 1's diagnosis of mental illness and the use of psychotropic (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) medications were not reflected in the PASRR. This failure had the potential for Resident 1 to not receive services she required in an appropriate setting as determined by the State agency. Findings: On August 2, 2023, at 11:48 a.m., an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted to investigate an allegation of abuse. On August 2, 2023, at 4:55 p.m., an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON stated she was not responsible for the PASRR screening until three weeks ago. The ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services to achieve and maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being were provided, for five of 25 residents reviewed, when: 1. For Resident 68, Ozempic (an injectable medication to treat diabetes mellitus [DM - abnormal blood sugar]) was not administered as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 68 to have uncontrolled blood sugar levels; 2. For Resident 31, morphine sulfate (a narcotic pain medication) was not administered as ordered by the physician. This failure had the potential for Resident 31 to experience pain and discomfort; 3. For Resident 86, licensed staff did not complete the neurological assessment (neurocheck) after the resident had unwitnessed fall incidents on September 10 and 16, 2021. This failure had the potential for delayed medical interventions. 4. For Resident 38, the physician was not notified when the blood sugar level was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided, when: 1. Necessary services to maintain personal hygiene was not provided, for one of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident 27); 2. During the confidential Resident Council (RC- independent group of long-term care facility residents who typically meet regularly to discuss concerns and suggestions in the facility and to plan activities that are important to them) interview, 12 out of 18 residents in attendance stated there was a delay in the staff's response to call lights, and that there was not enough Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) during night shifts and weekends; and 3. The facility was staffed below the minimum state requirements for direct care service hours per patient day on multiple dates. These findings had the potential for the residents in the facility to not receive necessary care and related services in a timely manner. In addition, these failures had the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards of practice were provided to meet the needs of the residents when: 1. Multiple opened emergency kits (e-kit - an emergency storage box containing small quantity of critical medications used in emergent situations) were not replaced within seventy-two hours according to the facility's policy and procedure. In addition, the opened e-kits did not match the medications taken out from it. These failures had the potential to result in a delay in the administration of medications and potential for medication diversion (transfer of a controlled substance or other medication from a lawful to an unlawful channel of distribution or use) to occur; 2. Cyclosporine eye drops (medication for dry eyes) was not acquired by the facility timely, for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 15). In addition, the physician was not notified the cyclosporine eye drops was not administered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-09-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions were maintained and food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety when: 1. During the initial kitchen tour on September 20, 2021, multiple food items were stored past the use-by date (the last day that the manufacturer vouches for the product's quality); and 2. During dining observation, on September 20, 2021, a ham and cheese sandwich was served to Resident 38 with the use-by date of September 19, 2021. These failures had the potential for the growth of harmful microorganisms which may result in food-borne illnesses in a medically vulnerable population. Findings: 1. On September 20, 2021, at 7:10 a.m., an initial kitchen tour was conducted with [NAME] 1. One container of baking powder was observed in the dry storage area with a received date of December 24, 2020, and a use-by date of June 24, 2021. During a concurrent interview with [NAME] 1, she stated the container's contents should have been discarded and not readily available for use. One…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-09-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control measures were implemented when: 1. For Resident 287, the urinary catheter (indwelling catheter - a hollow, flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder) drainage bag was observed on the floor. This failure had the potential for Resident 287 to develop urinary tract infection due to inappropriate placement of the urinary catheter drainage bag; 2. The blood pressure apparatus was not disinfected in between residents' use. This failure had the potential to result in the transmission of infection to the residents in the facility; 3. For Resident 28, who was a PUI (Person Under Investigation - patient with potential exposure to Covid-19 [(a highly contagious respiratory illness caused by the novel corona virus that can be spread from person to person)]newly admitted resident), did not wear facial mask covering while outside of his room. In addition, Resident 18, who no longer required isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for two of seven residents reviewed for Advance Directives (AD - a written instruction regarding the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated) (Residents 86 and 65), the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident 86, a follow up with the resident's representative (RR) was conducted regarding obtaining a copy of the resident's AD; and 2. For Resident 65, written information regarding formulating an AD was provided to the resident and/or the (RR). These failures had the potential to result in not determining and/or following the residents' wishes related to the provision of medical treatment and health care services when the residents become unable to make decisions for themselves. Findings: 1. On September 22, 2021, Resident 86's record was reviewed. Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). The History and Physical Examination, dated May 28, 2021, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, for one of three residents reviewed (Resident 89), the facility failed to ensure a post-discharge plan of care was completed and provided to the resident upon the resident's discharge from the facility. This failure had the potential for the resident and care giver to not receive the necessary medical information needed for the continuity of care of the resident upon discharge to home. Findings: On September 24, 2021, Resident 89's record was reviewed. Resident 89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included endocarditis (life-threatening inflammation of the inner lining of your heart's chambers and valves) and protein-calorie malnutrition. There was no documented evidence a post-discharge plan of care was completed in the resident's clinical record. Furthermore, there were no notes indicating discharge instructions were given to Resident 89. On September 24, 2021, at 10:42 a.m., an interview was conducted with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN 1). She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary services to maintain personal hygiene were provided for one of one resident reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Resident 27). This failure had the potential to result in poor personal hygiene which could negatively affect Resident 27's physical well-being. Findings: On September 20, 2021, at 2:50 p.m., Resident 27 was observed awake and lying in bed. In a concurrent interview with Resident 27, he stated he did not get a shower last Saturday (September 18, 2021), according to his shower schedule of Wednesdays and Saturdays. He stated there were only two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) assigned to their unit instead of six who were scheduled for that morning shift. He stated the facility was always short staffed. On September 23, 2021, Resident 27's record was reviewed. Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an environment free of accident hazards was provided, for one of five residents reviewed for falls (Resident 6), when the resident did not have a fall/tab alarm placed to prevent falls according to the physician's order and plan of care. This failure resulted to Resident 6 sustaining another fall incident on September 21, 2021. In addition, this failure had a potential to result for further falls and sustain injuries for Resident 6. Findings: On September 20, 2021, at 2:49 p.m., Resident 6 was observed sleeping and lying in bed. Resident 6's bed was observed to be in the lowest position with two floor mats on each side of the bed. There was no fall/tab alarm placed on the resident. On September 21, 2021, Resident 6's record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss). The plan of care, dated November 6, 2020, indicated, .At risk for fall .Will reduce the risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and treatment in accordance with the physician's order was provided, for one of one resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident 34). In addition, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were implemented when the oxygen tubing and nasal cannula (NC - a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) were observed to be on the floor. These failures had the potential to result in ineffective oxygen therapy, respiratory distress, infection, and/or decline in the health condition for Resident 34. Findings: On September 22, 2021, at 10:46 a.m., Resident 34 was observed sleeping in bed. The oxygen machine was observed running at 3.5 LPM (liters per minute - unit of measurement). Resident 34 was observed not wearing the nasal cannula. The nasal cannula and oxygen tubing were observed on the floor. On September 22, 2021, at 10:56 a.m., a Certified Nursing Assistant was observed entering the room and provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the episodes of behavior related to the use of lorazepam (medication for mood disorder) were properly monitored, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication (Resident 6). This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications used to treat mood disorder). Findings: On September 20, 2021, at 8:46 a.m., Resident 6 was observed sitting up in bed, yelling, and crying. On September 23, 2021, Resident 6's record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss). The plan of care, dated March 4, 2021, indicated, .Resident has diagnosis of Anxiety m/b (manifested by) restlessness .Will have less episodes of restlessness . Assessed (sic) for s/s (signs and symptoms) of anxiety/restlessness . The Medication Administration Record (MAR), for the month of August 2021, included a physician's order, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-09-24 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below five percent when there were six medication errors out of 38 opportunities observed, for two of five sampled residents (Residents 58 and 15). This failure resulted in a medication error rate of 15.79% and could result in the residents' not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medications. Findings: 1. On September 23, 2021, at 9:13 a.m., medication administration observation was conducted for Resident 58 with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 4. LVN 4 was observed placing the following medications in the medication cup: - One tablet of iron supplement 325 milligram (mg - unit of measurement); - One capsule of Florastor (probiotic); - One tablet of multivitamins with minerals; - One tablet of calcium carbonate (calcium supplement) 750 mg; - One soft gel of docusate sodium (stool softener) 250 mg; - One tablet of vitamin C 500 mg; - One tablet of folic acid (medication to treat anemia [low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored according to the facility's policy and procedure and per state and federal requirements when controlled medications (regulated and classified medications that can cause physical and mental dependence, and have restrictions on how they can be filled and refilled) were not stored in separately locked compartments and were mixed with non-controlled medications. This failure had the potential for the controlled medications to be accessed by unauthorized personnel, which could potentially lead to diversion or misappropriation of restricted medications. Findings: On September 22, 2021, at 11:59 a.m., Station 2 Medication Room was inspected with Registered Nurse Supervisor (RNS) 2. The following controlled medications were observed stored together with non-controlled medications inside the medication refrigerator: - A box containing an opened bottle of lorazepam solution (medication to treat anxiety [mood disorder]) labeled for Resident 31; and - A box containing an opened bottle of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-09-24 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the basic metabolic panel (BMP - a laboratory test to measure electrolyte levels) was completed, as ordered by the physician, for one of 25 residents reviewed (Resident 38). This failure had the potential for an abnormal electrolyte level to not be identified timely and could potentially result in the delay in care and treatment for Resident 38. Findings: On September 20, 2021, at 1:35 p.m., Resident 38 was observed sitting at the side of the bed eating her lunch. She stated she had lost weight since she came to the facility five months ago. On September 21, 2021, Resident 38's record was reviewed. Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (kidney disease). The History and Physical Examination, dated April 27, 2021, indicated Resident 38 had the capacity to understand and make decisions. The Lab (Laboratory) Results Report, dated July 16, 2021, indicated Resident 38 had a low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2021-09-24 · tag F0912 — patternProvide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the required 80 square feet per resident in 11 resident rooms, (Rooms 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39). Findings: On September 20, 2021, at 9:40 a.m., an entrance conference was held with the Administrator. The Administrator was interviewed regarding the room sizes for resident rooms 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, and 39. The Administrator stated the rooms, listed above, did not meet the space requirement of at least 80 square feet per resident. The Administrator stated the facility had a waiver for these rooms and would be requesting for a renewal of the waiver. The document titled, CLIENT ACCOMMODATIONS ANALYSIS, dated September 20, 2021, indicated the rooms were set up as three-bed rooms, measuring 214 square feet or 71 square feet per resident (214 square feet divided by 3 = 71 square feet. During the survey dates of September 20, 21, 22, 23, and 24, 2021, the above-listed rooms were observed at different times of the day. There were no adverse effects that impacted the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,500 — penalty dated 2024-04-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NAHS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NAHS HOLDING INC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/01/2020 |
| BHAMBI, MAHESH | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 08/01/2024 |
| ELLIS-SHERINIAN, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 10/01/2020 |
| SLOEY, JONATHAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 08/27/2024 |
| JOHNSON, MARC | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 11/20/2022 |
| WALTON, MARK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 10/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $730K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055474. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.