No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rocky Point Care Center

625 16th Street, Lakeport, CA 95453 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (707) 263-6101 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
801 11th St · (707) 263-3746 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
949 11th St · (707) 262-0244 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.4 mi
1071 11th St · (707) 263-8072 · Call to confirm hours
Park
804 11th St · (707) 263-4220 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.6%10.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.8%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.1%7.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.9%9.8%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.3%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine62.3%98.2%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.2%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.9%10.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.4%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine36.4%93.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.8%23.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.2%11.2%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.662.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.851.571.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.14U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.5%CMS range 56.6–69.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.9–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge60.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge73.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge88.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.7–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.47
RN hoursweekends
41.8%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 59.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.30 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.48 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-13)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents from physical abuse by Resident 2, when Resident 2 deliberately placed his hands on Resident 1 ' s chest and pushed him which caused Resident 1 to fall during an argument over a television (TV) channel inside their room. This failure resulted in a skin tear (a wound caused by direct force which separates the skin ' s layers) and an abrasion (a scrape) on Resident 1 ' s left forearm. Findings: A review of Resident 3 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the resident) dated 3/1/25, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS- a screening tool used to assess a person ' s memory and cognition (ability to think, understand, remember, and problem-solve)) score of 15, which meant his cognition was intact. A review of Resident 2 ' s MDS dated [DATE], indicated his BIMS score was 13,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notices of bed-hold policies for two of three sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) wo were transferred from the facility.This failure placed the two residents at risk for unlawful discharge from the facility.During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a summary of the patient's essential personal, clinical, and insurance information), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including severe dementia with behavioral disturbance (often manifested as agitation, aggression, and delusions), hiatal hernia (a condition where the upper part of the stomach bulges into the chest), chronic pain, encephalopathy (a syndrome of overall brain dysfunction), anxiety (fear and worry that is both intense and excessive), insomnia (difficulty falling or staying asleep), cerebral palsy (a brain disorder that affects body movement and muscle coordination), and recurrent depressive disorder (a mental health condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to readmit one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) after hospitalization, referencing prehospitalization behaviors despite no change in Resident 1's health care needs.This finding resulted in the resident being transferred to another skilled nursing facility after hospitalization, further away from family who could advocate for his needs. This had the potential to result in Resident 1 experiencing unnecessary disruption in his care, emotional distress, and a lack of continuity in treatment and services.Findings:During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a summary of the patient's essential personal, clinical, and insurance information), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including severe dementia with behavioral disturbance (often manifested as agitation, aggression, and delusions), hiatal hernia (a condition where the upper part of the stomach bulges into the chest), chronic pain, encephalopathy (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-13 · tag F0912 — widespread
    Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, measurement and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bedrooms met the minimum required 80 square feet of living space per resident for 23 out of 31 resident rooms. This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents' were provided a comfortable living environment to support the dignity, privacy and safe mobility within the room.Findings: In an interview on 3/10/25 at 11:06 a.m., Resident 51 stated, the room is small for 3 people.In a concurrent observation and interview on 3/10/26 at 11:28 a.m., the Maintenance Director (MD) measured room [ROOM NUMBER] and confirmed each residents' living space was 7 feet by 8 feet. The MD stated, Is there a minimum [room] size for residents? I don't know. In an interview on 3/10/26 at 11:34 a.m., Resident 6 stated, The room's a bit small to maneuver in; I'm mainly out in the halls. In an interview with the MD on 3/11/26 at 8:19 a.m., MD confirmed all square footag provided on the facility map were correct and the numbers in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nurses failed to ensure the medication rate was below five percent when five errors were observed during 34 medication passes, which resulted in a 14.71% error rate.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure medication was administered as ordered by the physician and decreased the expected efficacy of the medication. (Cross-reference F760)Findings:During a medication pass observation on 3/11/26 at 8:17 a.m., Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) administered the following medications to Resident 32:Glipizide (an oral medication used to manage blood sugar levels) 5 milligrams (mg-a unit of measure) by mouth two times per day. Give 30 minutes before meals; and,Basaglar kwik-pen(R) (a long-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels) Inject 20 units subcutaneously (into the fatty tissue layer located under the skin).During this observation, upon entry to Resident 32's room, a eaten breakfast tray was on Resident 32's overbed table. LN 2 gave Resident 32 all the oral medications to take, followed by the Basaglar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, dietary staff failed to ensure palatability and nutritive value for 60 residents who were served food from the kitchen during the lunch meal on 3/11/26 when foods were held on the steam table for over 1.5 to 2 hours and the test tray of purred food and vegetables was found to be gummy and bland.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent weight loss and malnutrition among residents.Findings:A review of the resident council meeting minutes from June, July, October, and November 2025, indicated various complaints regarding poor food quality, texture of food was inedible, and being rushed during meals.During an interview on 3/10/26 at 2:37 p.m., Resident 46 stated the food was not of good quality and they cook the heck out of the vegetables.During an observation of meal preparation on 3/11/26 at 9 a.m., [NAME] 7 was observed opening a can of corn and placing its contents in a pot on the stove top to cook. [NAME] 7 placed the cooked corn on the steam table at 9:50 a.m. [NAME] 7 then prepared the gravy for the roast beef and the pureed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the nursing and maintenance staff failed to ensure respiratory equipment was clean for four residents (Resident 30, 26, 42, 58) out of seven sampled residents when the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to people with breathing-related conditions by pulling in ambient air, filtering out nitrogen, and delivering purified oxygen) in the resident's rooms had visible dust and debris in the vents and needed a filter change.This failure decreased the facility's potential to prevent bacteria and debris from directly entering the resident's lungs, placing them at risk for infection.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 30's admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and malignant neoplasm of the left breast (breast cancer). A review of an order listing report indicated Resident 30 had the following order dated 1/5/26 and revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses did not administer oxygen per physician's orders for two residents (Resident 67 and Resident 58) of nine sampled residents when:Resident 58 did not have the ordered amount of oxygen being delivered and,Resident 67 did not have a humidifier attached to the oxygen concentrator (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to people with breathing-related conditions by pulling in ambient air, filtering out nitrogen, and delivering purified oxygen)These failures had the potential to place residents at risk for inadequate oxygenation and a potential decline in respiratory status.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 58's admission record indicated Resident 58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a progressive lung disease that blocks airflow, making it difficult to breathe) and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (a long term lung condition where lungs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's Interdisciplinary Team (a collaborative group of health care professionals who provide comprehensive, patient-centered care) failed to initiate a comprehensive care plan regarding Resident 46's hearing impairment and ensure hearing services were provided for Resident 46 of two sampled residents .This failure decreased the facility's potential to assist residents in gaining access to necessary care regarding her hearing impairment.Findings:A review of Resident 46's admission record indicated admission to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Hypertensive Heart (structural and functional heart damage caused by long-term high blood pressure, leading to heart failure), Chronic Kidney Disease (long-term, progressive loss of kidney function, often causing waste buildup, high blood pressure, and anemia), and a History of Falling.A review of Resident 46's admission inventory list dated 12/30/25 indicated Resident 46 had right and left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensed nurses failed to ensure pharmaceutical services met the needs of each resident when:The facility did not sign delivery receipts for narcotic and non-controlled medications on 3/1/26, 3/2/26, 3/6/26 to 3/8/26, and 3/10/26 for a combined total of 1,036 doses.Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 left medications at Resident 44's bedside.These failures decreased the facility's potential to ensure safe and secure medication management, increased the risk of medication loss or diversion (the illegal transfer of prescription drugs to be sold for profit or for personal abuse) and decreased the potential for medications to be safely administered among residents.Findings:1. During a concurrent interview and record review with LN 4 at the South Nurses station on 3/12/26 at 11:42 a.m., the binder containing pharmaceutical delivery receipts was examined. LN 4 confirmed there were no signatures present on the delivery receipts dated 3/1/26, 3/2/26, 3/6/26 to 3/8/26, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the licensed nurses failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for three residents (Resident 6, 32, and 8) of 10 sampled residents when:1. Residents 6 and 32 were not administered insulin pen injections as per manufacturer's instructions and;2. Resident 8 was not administered rifaximin (a medication used to kill bacteria that produces ammonia in the intestines and prevents toxins from reaching the brain and causing confusion or severe personality changes) for 36 doses.These failures placed the residents at risk for avoidable adverse clinical outcomes including uncontrolled blood glucose levels and exacerbation of liver disease.Findings:1. During a concurrent interview and medication pass observation on [DATE] at 8:17 a.m., Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2) administered 20 units of glargine (long-acting insulin which provides steady 24-hr blood sugar control) via an insulin pen to Resident 32's right lower abdomen. LN 2 injected the insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 29 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to protect Resident 1's right to be free from verbal abuse when Resident 2 verbally abused Resident 1 by yelling profanities and calling her an expletive.These failures decreased the facility's potential to prevent mental anguish and emotional distress among residents.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated admission to the facility in January 2026 with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder (excessive, persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily life) and depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). Resident 1 was her own responsible party (RP, a person who can manage their own health and financial decisions).A review of Resident 2's admission record indicated admission to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses which included depression. Resident 2 was his own RP.A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score conducted on 11/5/25, indicated she had a BIMS score of 12 which meant she had moderate ability to think, reason, and learn.A review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse within two hours to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) for one resident (Resident 1) of two sampled residents when Resident 2 yelled and threated Resident 1 on 12/25/25, 12/31/25, and 1/7/26.This failure decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents were protected against abuse.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission record indicated she has anxiety disorder (excessive, persistent fear or worry that interferes with daily life) and depression (a mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness). Resident 1 was her own responsible party (a person who can manage their own health and financial decisions).A review of Resident 1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score conducted on 11/5/25, indicated she had a BIMS score of 12 which meant she had moderate ability to think, reason, and learn.A review Resident 2's BIMS score conducted on 12/3/25, indicated Resident 2 had a BIMS score of 15 (no cognitive impairment).A review of Resident 2's progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner when:1. Muffins with mold (mold is a type of fungus that can grow on food) were served on breakfast trays, and six residents consumed them.2. Dry goods were improperly stored when expired cocoa powder was in the storage area, a gravy packet had leaked, chocolate chips were in an open plastic bag without a date when it was opened.3. Deli meat in a refrigerator was ten days past its use by date.4. Frozen pancakes and frozen egg rolls did not have a date when they were received.5. Trash cans were uncovered during tray line (name of process where food was served on resident's plates). This failure had the potential to cause food-borne illness in 64 of 64 vulnerable residents.Findings:1. During an interview on 8/26/25 at 2:15 p.m., [NAME] A stated she received a report from Dietary Aide B (DA B) that moldy muffins were served to residents on [NAME] A's day off.During an interview on 8/26/25 at 4 p.m., Licensed Nurse C (LN C) stated the moldy muffins were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served safely in accordance with professional standards of food service when:1. Soiled equipment was observed in a food prep area;2. The floor was noted to have solid food debris, built up dust, and dirt underneath the sink and behind the oven;3. Kitchen staff did not monitor the tray line food temperatures; and,4. Kitchen staff did not use facial hair nets.These failures posed the risk for food borne illnesses for 57 of 57 residents who resided in the facility and consumed food prepared in the kitchen.Findings:1. During an observation on 7/16/25 at 12:15 p.m., the following observations were made:The stovetop had black residue and debris in burner wells; The dishrack had visible grime and black residue; The ceiling vents over the steamtable had a large amount of dust build up; and the air conditioning unit had dust build up on the vents over the food prep table. During an interview on 7/17/25 at 12:20 p.m., the Corporate Registered Dietician (CRD) acknowledged the kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to create a homelike environment for a census of 57 residents when walls in multiple residents' rooms were damaged and carpeting throughout the facility was worn and stained.These failures decreased the facility's potential to ensure residents were provided a safe, clean, comfortable, homelike environment to support their overall well-being.Findings:During interval observations on 7/17/25 between 9:48 a.m. and 2:50 p.m., carpeting throughout hallways of the facility was noted to be worn with multiple stains of varying sizes and colors. The carpeting was matted down with dirt and heavy traffic at each doorway entry.During an observation on 7/17/25 at 10:16 a.m., torn wallpaper and wall damage with exposed drywall (building material) was observed in Resident 2's room. During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/17/25at 10:26 a.m., torn wallpaper in several areas in Resident 3's room was observed. Resident 3 stated, It's been that way for a long, long time. I don't know how it happened. But you can't miss it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff were aware of whom to report abuse allegations and the timeframe for reporting abuse allegations. 2. Report an abuse allegation timely, when two out of two abuse allegations (Residents 36 and 15's altercation and Resident 221's alleged abuse) were reported more than two hours later after the abuse allegation was made. These failures could lead to ongoing abuse and could result in residents feeling scared, upset, and frustrated. Findings: A review of Resident 36's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 1/14/21. His diagnoses include bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy and causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs (mania or hypomania) and lows (depression)), Muscle Weakness and Cerebellar Ataxia (the inability to control voluntary muscle movements, which can cause problems with balance, walking (gait), speech, swallowing). Resident 36's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the nurses were following the Physician's Order for pain medication for one out of two sampled residents (Resident 37), when the nurses administered a pain medication that was not appropriate for the pain level Resident 37 was reporting. This failure could result in unrelieved pain, worsened pain, impaired mobility, and residents feeling upset, angry and frustrated. Findings: A review of Resident 37's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 3/21/24. Her diagnoses include Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS, a long-standing pain that persists beyond the usual recovery period or occurs along with a chronic health condition), Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure) and right Tibial fracture (a break in the shinbone). Resident 37's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents), dated 4/30/24, score was 15 out of 15 indicating intact cognition (the conscious and unconscious processes involved in thinking, perceiving, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    During an observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were served food items that were palatable and at the right temperature, for four out of four sampled residents (Residents 30, 6, 38, and 43). These failures could put the residents at risk for loss of appetite, frustration, malnutrition (condition that develops when the body is deprived of vitamins, minerals, and other nutrients it needs to maintain healthy tissues and organ), and weight loss. Findings: A review of Resident 30's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents), dated 3/18/24, score was 1, indicating severely impaired cognition (the mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things). A review of Resident 6's BIMS, dated 3/22/24, score was 15, indicating intact cognition. A review of Resident 38's BIMS, dated 5/11/24, score was 15, indicating intact cognition. A review of Resident 43's BIMS, dated 5/11/24, score was 13, indicating intact cognition. During an interview on 06/17/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated items in the kitchen were clearly labeled, easily identified, and dated. These failures could compromise food safety and could lead to residents getting sick with gastrointestinal (GI, made up of organs that food and liquids travel through when they are swallowed, digested, absorbed) illness such as Salmonella (an infection with Salmonella bacteria that causes diarrhea- passage of three or more liquid stools, fever and stomach pains), Gastroenteritis (stomach flu) and food poisoning (an illness caused by eating contaminated food). Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/24 at 9:25 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) verified the following items in the three-door refrigerator had no use-by or discard date: vanilla extract, chocolate syrup and a yellow mustard. There was also a bin that contained sandwiches for lunch alternates for the day, which had no labels, no date on when it was made and had no use-by date. [NAME] 3 verified the sandwiches were not labeled or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-21 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Perishable food items from home, stored in the refrigerator for the residents, was dated and labeled with the resident's name. 2. Staff were aware on the facility's policy on when to discard refrigerated food items from home. These failures could lead to cross-contamination, and unsafe and unsanitary storage of food, which were a safety risk that could lead to accidental ingestion of expired food items and food being served to the unintended residents. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/18/24 at 2:45 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated it was important to label the food with residents' names, date when it was opened and date when to discard. The DON stated it was important to label the food with residents' names so that the food would go to the right resident. The DON stated food in the refrigerator was discarded after three days from opening to prevent residents from getting sick. The DON verified the following items were not labeled with the residents' names:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure: 1. Hand hygiene (HH, hand-washing with water and plain or antiseptic soap or rubbing hands with an alcohol-based product in the form of a gel to clean hands and remove dirt, bacteria, and viruses) was offered and provided, for seven out of seven sampled residents (Residents 18, 29, 28, 10, 54, 1 and 14). 2. Utensils were cleaned thoroughly and stored under sanitary conditions, when there was a plate on the plate warmer noted with dried food, and kitchen utensils were not properly dried prior to storing in the drawer. These failures could lead to residents getting sick with infection if they were not offered or provided HH before and after meals. Dishes and utensils that have not been thoroughly cleaned, rinsed, and dried could result in cross-contamination and bacteria growing on dishes and utensils, which could result in residents' getting sick. Findings: 1. During an observation on 6/17/24 at 12:13 p.m., Resident 18 was not offered or provided HH prior to eating her lunch. During an observation on 6/17/24 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an explanation for not providing a SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage) and a NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage), to one of three residents (Resident 220), prior to discharge from the facility. This failure had the potential to prevent the resident from making an informed decision about their discharge from the facility. Findings: During an interview on 6/18/24 at 10 AM, the Administrator was given three SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) Beneficiary Notification Review Forms (Form CMS-20052). Each form contained the name of a resident who had been discharged from the facility. Per Form CMS-20052, The intent of the checklist is to provide the surveyor with all copies of the forms issued to the resident, and if the notification was not required, an explanation of why the form was not issued. During a record review on 6/19/24 at 3:24 PM, the SNF Beneficiary Protection Notification Review for two of three Residents was completed correctly. The SNF Beneficiary Protection…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure : 1. Staff were aware of the Baseline Care Plan (BCP, an initial person-centered care plan, completed within 48 hours of admission, that provides instructions for the care of the residents) completion timeframe. 2 .The BCP was completed timely for three out of three sampled residents (Residents 54, 60 and 28). These failures had the potential to lead to delayed or omitted care, missed medications or treatments, medical complications, and deconditioning. Findings: A review of Resident 54's face sheet (demographics) indicated an admission date of 3/21/24. Her diagnoses include Muscle Weakness, Lymphedema (a chronic disease marked by the increased collection of lymphatic fluid in the body, causing swelling) and Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of Resident 54's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, a mandatory tool used to screen and identify the cognitive condition of residents), dated 3/25/24, score was 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognition (the conscious and unconscious processes involved in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that three of eight sampled residents, Resident 2, 38, and 51, received care and services that met their physical, mental, and emotional needs, and according to the facility's policy and procedure on answering call lights and repositioning, when these residents had to wait for a long time before they were assisted after pushing their call light buttons to request for assistance from their aides. These failures had the potential to result in skin breakdown, when the residents were left soiled in urine or feces (the material in a bowel movement), or when residents were left in a certain position for a significant amount of time and could also affect their emotional well-being. Findings: A review of Resident 2's MDS (Minimum Data Set- is part of the federally-mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes) Section C- Cognitive (Cognitive means relating to the mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things) Patterns, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were not receiving food items that they did not like, for one out of three sampled residents (Residents 117). This failure could result in Resident 117 not eating the food and could put Resident 117 at risk for weight loss and inadequate nutrition. Findings: A review of Resident 117's face sheet indicated his admission date as 6/6/24, with diagnoses of Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Muscle Weakness and Essential Hypertension (HTN, high blood pressure). A review of Resident 117's lunch diet ticket on 6/19/24 at 12:03 p.m., indicated he disliked breaded food. A review of the menu for 6/19/24, indicated lunch included breaded fried chicken. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/24 at 12:04 p.m., [NAME] 1 stated she had already finished plating for Resident 117, and verified she added a breaded fried chicken on his lunch tray. [NAME] 1 stated his meal tray was already placed in the meal cart. [NAME] 1 verified Resident 117 disliked breaded food items and should not be served…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen floor was in good repair, when the linoleum (a hard, washable floor covering formed by coating burlap or canvass with linseed oil, powdered cork, and resin, and adding pigments to create the desired colors and patterns) floor on multiple parts of the kitchen area (by the gas stove, door leading to the hallway, the sink) was coming apart and its edges were raised off the floor. This failure could be an infection control issue due to difficulty in ensuring the floor was adequately cleaned and sanitized. This failure could also be a safety issue due to being a trip hazard. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/17/24 at 9:19 a.m., [NAME] 3 verified the linoleum floor was falling apart on different parts of the kitchen area. [NAME] 3 stated the kitchen floor should always be clean, and the floor should always be in good repair. [NAME] 3 stated she tripped on the linoleum floor by the gas range every time she went to work. [NAME] 3 stated, the linoleum flooring not being in good repair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was free of flies. This failure posed a health risk, as flies carry diseases such as Salmonella (a group of bacteria that can cause diarrhea-passage of three or more liquid stools, in humans) and Cholera (an infectious disease that causes severe watery diarrhea), which could contaminate the food stored, prepared and served to the residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation on 6/19/24 at 12:05 p.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) and the Registered Dietitian (RD) both verified there was a fly in the kitchen. During a concurrent observation and interview on 6/19/24 at 12:11 p.m., [NAME] 2 verified there was a fly hovering in the kitchen. [NAME] 2 stated this was not an isolated incident, and flies could be seen in the kitchen from time to time. [NAME] 2 stated there should be no flies in the kitchen area. [NAME] 2 stated the facility could only do so much, and although they have a fan blower, it was not enough to keep the flies away. [NAME] 2 stated it was not acceptable to have flies in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow physician orders to get blood work done for Resident 1 which would have included Resident 1's blood sugar level. This failure to have blood work drawn caused the facility to not identify and treat Resident 1's diabetes, resulting in elevated blood sugar levels that interfere with healing processes. Findings: During a review of Resident 1's acute care medical record, Resident 1's History and Physical dated 10/1/23, documented Resident 1 had an elevated Hbg A 1c (a measure of one's average blood sugar levels over the past 3 months) at 13.3% indicating her blood sugar was poorly controlled. During a review of the medical records, Resident 1's admission Record documented she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the acute care hospital. Resident 1's diagnosis included: Acute Respiratory failure, Pneumonia, Heart Failure, and Type 2 Diabetes without complications. During a review of the medical records, Resident 1's Order Summary Report (printed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment to two of two residents (Residents 1 and 2) by not ensuring their room was free of flies. This failure resulted in Residents 1 and 2's well-being and sleep being disturbed by the flies. Findings: During an observation of Residents 1 and 2's room on 8/30/23, at 3:35 p.m., two flies were in the room. During a concurrent interview, Residents 1 and 2 reported the presence of flies in their room bothered them and disturbed their sleep. During an interview on 8/30/23, at 4:15 p.m., the Administrator stated there should not be flies in residents' rooms.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-07-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu as posted when residents on a pureed diet were not served the rice dish, and wheat rolls were not served when on the menu. This resulted in residents not getting a full meal and missing an opportunity to have whole grain bread. Findings: During an interview on 7/11/22 at 12:30 p.m., Unsampled Resident 8 stated the food served was not what it said on the menu. Review of the posted menu for 7/11/22 through 7/17/22 revealed that on 7/13/22 the residents would be served Balsamic Glazed Pork, Herb Rice, Spinach with Onions, Wheat Roll, and Raspberry Bavarian for lunch. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 1/20/2022, on page titled Resident Council Discussion of New Business, the Dietary Department section indicated, Menus - concerns that menus are not being followed. Meeting minutes dated 2/17/2022, on page titled Old Business was written Dietary - concerns that menus are not being followed (unresolved). Meeting minutes dated 3/17/22, on New Business page, indicated in dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to honor residents' request for more variety of fruits and seasonal fruits when the dietary department only ordered and kept in stock oranges and bananas. This failure caused residents to eat the same fruit repeatedly with no variation. Findings: During an interview on 7/11/22 at 12:20 p.m., Unsampled Resident 8 stated it was rare to have fresh fruit, we get bananas, but who wants bananas all the time? . There are no peaches, it's peach season. Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes January 2022 through June 2022 revealed the Resident Council had requested to have fresh fruit in season. Meeting minutes dated 4/21/22, on page titled Resident Council Discussion of New Business, Dietary Department section indicated, Would like fresh fruit. Meeting minutes dated 5/19/22, on page titled Old Business, Fresh fruit was marked as unresolved. Meeting minutes dated 6/16/22, on New Business page in dietary department section was written Seasonal fruits instead of with no further information. During an observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-07-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the floors clean under the refrigerators and freezers in the kitchen. This failure could potentially attract vermin in the kitchen. Findings: During an observation and concurrent interview on 7/11/22 at 12:02 p.m., an Initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. Several refrigerators and freezers on casters lined the walls adjacent to the dietary managers office. Underneath the refrigerators and freezers was accumulation of dust, debris, corn kernals, butter packets, and plastic lids. Management Staff E verified there was corn, a butter packet, and plastic lids under the refrigerators and freezers. She stated the dietary staff were expected to mop under the refrigerators and freezers nightly. Management Staff E verified the build up of debris looked like more than would happen after preparing two meals. Management Staff E verified it was not up to her standards of cleanliness. Review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, last revised 2017, Chapter 4, subsection 4-6 Cleaning of Equipment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement its Policy and Procedure on filing grievances/complaints by residents when: 1) Residents did not know where to get the grievance forms. 2) Residents did not know how to file grievance when their right were violated. 3) Residents were in fear of discrimination and fear of retaliation from staff when they voiced their concern or grievance. These failures had the potential to result in violation of resident's rights, maltreatment, neglect, and unresolved grievances. Findings: 1) During the Resident Council interview on 7/12/2022 at 10:30 a.m. in the Dining room, 15 Residents attended, the ombudsman and this Surveyor. When asked if they know how to file grievance. 10 Residents raised hands to indicate that they don't know where to get the grievance form. During an observation on 7/13/2022 at 10 a.m., blank grievance form found inside a folder in a slot at the front door entrance of the Dining room behind the front desk screener. The slot was position above eye level when seating on a wheelchair. 2) During the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-15 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow it policy and procedure to provide a copy of transfer/discharge notice to the representative of the Office of the Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman for two out of three sampled residents (Resident 10 and Resident 5). These failures could have prevented the Ombudsman to advocate for Resident 10 and Resident 5 and potentially resulted in inappropriate transfers/discharges from the facility. Findings: Resident 10 During a review of resident 10's Progress Notes, dated 3/29/22, at 9:10 p.m., authored by Licensed Staff A, the progress note indicated that Resident 10 was found on the bathroom floor after a fall and 911 call was placed. During a review of Resident 10's Progress Notes, dated 3/29/22, at 10:50 a.m., authored by Licensed Staff H, the progress note indicated, MD (MD O, a physician) ordered resident transfer to (name of hospital) for eval (evaluation) and treatment with a 4-7 day bed hold. Order entered by this nurse. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-07-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans to 5 of 18 sampled residents (Residents 103, 5, 23, 16, and 25), that meets the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and physical needs, that were identified in their comprehensive assessments. These failures had the potential to negatively impact Resident 103, 5, 23, 16 and 25's quality of life, as well as the quality of care and services they received. Findings: Resident 103 During a review of Resident 103's admission Record, the admission record indicated Resident 103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record indicated one of Resident 103's medical diagnosis was tobacco use. During a review of Resident 103's Smoking Safety Evaluation, dated 6/29/22, it indicated that supervision was required for all residents during designated smoking times. During a review of Resident 103's Care Plan on 7/12/22, at 3:01 p.m., the care plan indicated that there was no plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were given timely for eight residents (Resident 46, Resident 30, Resident 9, Resident 33, Resident 7, Resident 18, Resident 35, and Resident 17). This failure could result in residents having increased pain or anxiety due to delay in receiving their medications on time. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 7/13/22 at 09:20 am, with Licensed Staff F, Licensed Staff F gave Resident 46, 5 of his 08:00 medications at 09:20 am. They were as follows: Carvediol (medication for heart failure), Amlodipine (medication for high blood pressure), Lisinopril (medication for high blood pressure), Paroxetine (medication for depression), and Flomax (medication for treating the symptoms of an enlarged prostate). During a medication pass observation on 7/13/22/at 09:30 am, with Licensed Staff F, Licensed Staff F gave Resident 30, 7 of his 08:00 medications at 09:30 am. They were as follows: Clonazepam (medication used to prevent and control seizures), Cymbalta (medication for depression and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-07-15 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to serve a flavorful pureed food to residents on a pureed diet. This failure resulted in residents on a pureed diet being served a bland food. Findings: During a tray line observation and interview on 7/13/22 at 12:35 p.m., Dietary Staff L plated two pureed diets with pork and spinach. Dietary Staff L placed a plate cover over each plate, and handed them to Dietary Staff M, who placed them on trays with drinks and untensils. Dietary Staff M placed the trays of pureed food on the tray cart. When queried, Management Staff E verified there was no pureed starch for the pureed diet. Management Staff E stated, He (Dietary Staff L) forgot to make the rice, and stated, It's too late now. He could make cream of rice? Management Staff E spoke with another dietary staff who got a pot of water and made cream of rice. During a test tray observation with Management Staff J on 7/13/22 at 12:49 p.m., the pureed rice tasted bland. During an interview on 7/14/22 at 9:16 a.m., Management Staff E stated when Dietary Staff L…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the physician was made aware of a significant weight loss for one of one sampled residents (Resident 27). This failure could result in continuous weight loss and harm to Resident 27. Findings: Resident 27's admission record indicated Resident 27 had diagnoses including Dementia (impairment in memory and judgement), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease of memory loss and confusion), and Adult Failure to Thrive (weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition and inactivity). During a concurrent observation and interview on 7/11/22 at 1:30 pm , Resident 27 was in her room and appeared sleeping in bed. Resident 27 appeared thin. Unlicensed staff I was at her bedside speaking with her and encouraging her to get up. Unlicensed Staff I stated Resident 27 looked so different from when she (Unlicensed Staff I) was here a few months ago. Unlicensed Staff I stated Resident 27 was up and walking around, but now she is mostly in bed. During a record review on 7/11/22 at 3:00 pm, the Patient Weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-07-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a prescribed psychotropic (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication had a documented, specific diagnosis with adequate monitoring for effectiveness for one of five residents sampled for unnecessary medication review (Resident 23). This failure potentially resulted in Resident 23 taking an unnecessary medication. Findings: During an observation on 7/11/22 at 1:43 p.m., Resident 23 was in her wheelchair and self-propelled out of her room into hallway. At the nurses' station, Resident 23 asked her CNA (certified nursing assistant) for something. The CNA responded, A soda pop? They're in the med[ication] room, I don't have the keys. The CNA walked away. Resident 23 approached this surveyor and briefly discussed the warm weather in a calm and pleasant affect. Resident 23 stated she would like a soda. When asked what kind of the soda she would like, Resident 23 stated she did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NAHS — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 54.0-1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.0★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
NAHS NORTH INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2021
NAHS HOLDING INCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 10/01/2021
SCHELL, KRISTINAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/2021
BEAMAN, JACOBIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2021
ELLIS-SHERINIAN, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/01/2021
DALY, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021
LUNDQUIST, VICTORIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 10/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$522K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 70%Medicare 26%Other / private 4%

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $522K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$468per resident / day
operating cost
$14,214per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$470per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055499. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next