No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

YAD HEALTHCARE

Ownership rollup across 13 nursing homes in 3 states: North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia. The "follow the money" view of an operator’s whole portfolio — the pattern a single facility page can’t show.

Insights

The chain’s homes average 1.7 of 5 stars on the CMS overall rating — about 1.3 stars below the ~2.9 average of the 3 states it operates in. A whole portfolio rating below its own states’ norm is a pattern worth researching, not a single-home fluke. It has been broadly flat, moving +0.00 stars across the same 12 homes rated throughout between 2025-02 and 2026-06. We benchmark against its own states because CMS ranks the health-inspection star within each state, so a national comparison (national average ~3.0) partly measures where a chain operates rather than how it operates.

13
Homes in this chain
1,328
Certified beds102 per home on average
87%
Occupied1,149 residents a day across 1,328 beds
+0.00
Star changeacross the 12 homes rated throughout · 2025-02 to 2026-06
3
States covered
1.7
Average CMS ratingacross 12 of 13 homes CMS rates · ~2.9 in its states · ~3.0 nationally

Where the rating comes from

The CMS overall star blends three different things. Split apart across the whole portfolio, they say different things about an operator: thin staffing is a budget decision made above the building, while a weak inspection score is what surveyors actually found inside it.

ComponentChain averageBasis
Health inspection2.2 of 512 rated homesstate surveyors’ findings, ranked within each state
Staffing1.3 of 512 rated homesfrom payroll (PBJ) hours
Quality measures2.8 of 512 rated homeslargely self-reported clinical data

Averaged across this chain’s rated homes. Health-inspection stars are assigned within each state’s own distribution, so for a chain spanning several states this component mixes distributions and is best read alongside each home’s actual citations.

Portfolio red flags

How many of this chain’s homes carry the most serious CMS markers. One flagged home can be local; a pattern across the portfolio is an operator-level signal worth researching.

6 with immediate-jeopardy citations1 on the CMS Special Focus list2 with an abuse flag9 with federal fines

Follow the money — chain finances

Aggregated from each home’s CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS). Related-party payments are dollars a home sends to landlords or management companies under common ownership — the main channel through which private-equity and REIT owners can pull money out of a home while its own books still show a thin margin.

$13.1M
Related-party expensesummed across 13 homes · FY2023 cost reports
11%
of operating expensegoes to related companies, across the 13 homes reporting both figures
+4.1%
Operating marginrevenue-weighted across 13 homes with a cost report
$758K
Total federal fines9 homes fined

Only homes with a cost report on file are included, so the related-party total is a floor. Cost reports are self-filed, unaudited, and a year or two behind.

Who pays — share of resident-days across this chain
Medicaid 75%Medicare 8%Other / private 17%

Weighted by each home’s average daily census, across the all 13 homes that report both a usable payer mix and a census. Homes whose cost report fails the same validity check the facility pages apply are left out of this figure entirely rather than counted as zero.

Every home in this chain

Lowest-rated first, so the homes most worth a closer look sit at the top. Each links to its full inspection, staffing, fines, and ownership record.

HomeCMS ratingFlags
Brunswick Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterBolivia, NC 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $94,140 fined
Fletcher Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterFletcher, NC 1 of 5Abuse flag $62,868 fined
Laurel Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterElizabeth City, NC 1 of 5$10,868 fined
Warsaw Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterWarsaw, NC 1 of 51 immediate-jeopardy $43,924 fined
St Andrews Operator, LLCColumbia, SC 1 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $52,910 fined
Amelia Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAmelia, VA 1 of 5Abuse flag $38,560 fined
Courtland Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterCourtland, VA 1 of 5$13,247 fined
Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterAsheboro, NC 2 of 5
Ramseur Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterRamseur, NC 2 of 52 immediate-jeopardy $102,656 fined
Emporia Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterEmporia, VA 2 of 5
Waverly Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWaverly, VA 3 of 5
Kenansville Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterKenansville, NC 4 of 51 immediate-jeopardy
Rockwell Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterCharlotte, NCNot rated4 immediate-jeopardy Special Focus $338,513 fined
Read this as a floor, not a verdict. CMS chain and ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties, and a low chain average can hide strong individual homes (or vice-versa). Use it to know which questions to ask — then read each home’s actual inspection record and confirm current ownership with your state licensing agency.

Source: CMS Provider Data Catalog (nursing-home ratings, deficiencies, penalties, and ownership) and the CMS Medicare cost report (HCRIS) for finances. Chain membership is as reported to CMS. CMS extracts retrieved 30 August 2026; CMS refreshes them monthly, so counts here are as of that date. Verify with the facility and your state regulator.