Waverly Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.8 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.03 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.38 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 72% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure correct completion and acknowledgment of receipt of an insurance Advance Beneficiary Notice [ABN] of Non-Coverage, for one Resident (#1) in a survey sample of 6 Residents.The findings included.For Resident #1 the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 signed and acknowledged receipt of the notice of loss of insurance coverage and her right to appeal the decision.On 5-12-26 at approximately 2:00 PM the business office manager was given the name of the client record required for ABN notices review. She returned with Resident #1's ABN notice which was not dated, nor signed.Page 1 documented Resident #1's name and Effective Date Coverage of Your Current Skilled Nursing Facility Services Will End: 7-14-25. The document informed that a request for immediate appeal should be made as soon as possible but no later than noon on the day before the effective date. The document provided a telephone number to contact QIO Livanta LLC…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for two residents (Residents #3 & #4) in a survey sample of six residents. The findings included. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to prevent verbal abuse, failed to fully investigate that abuse, failed to report it to the state agency, and failed to train staff timely on abuse after abuse occurred. Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Stroke, hypertension, depression, and chronic obstructive respiratory disease. The Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) to the alleged incident coded Resident #3 with moderate cognitive impairment, is able to be understood and understand others. The Resident required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers and ambulation, he was independent for eating, toileting, and hygiene, and was ambulatory with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to investigate, report to the State Agency, and implement the facility abuse policies for two Residents (Residents #3 & #4) in a survey sample of six Residents. The findings included. 1. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to investigate, report, and implement the facility abuse policies after a staff member witnessed and made an allegation of verbal abuse. Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Stroke, hypertension, depression, and chronic obstructive respiratory disease. The Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) to the alleged incident coded Resident #3 with moderate cognitive impairment, is able to be understood and understand others. The Resident required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers and ambulation, he was independent for eating, toileting, and hygiene, and was ambulatory with a walker or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to report neglect and abuse for two Residents (Residents #3 & #4) in a survey sample of six residents. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to report an allegation of verbal abuse.The findings included.Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Stroke, hypertension, depression, and chronic obstructive respiratory disease.The Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) to the alleged incident coded Resident #3 with moderate cognitive impairment, is able to be understood and understand others. The Resident required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers and ambulation, he was independent for eating, toileting, and hygiene, and was ambulatory with a walker or wheelchair.On 5-12-26 at 10:30 a.m. Resident #3's electronic clinical record was reviewed. Nursing, Social work, and physician Progress revealed no indication of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to investigate neglect and abuse for two Residents (Residents #3 & #4) in a survey sample of six residents. For Resident #3, the facility staff failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of abuse.The findings included.Resident #3 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to, Stroke, hypertension, depression, and chronic obstructive respiratory disease.The Resident's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) to the alleged incident coded Resident #3 with moderate cognitive impairment, is able to be understood and understand others. The Resident required limited assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers and ambulation, he was independent for eating, toileting, and hygiene, and was ambulatory with a walker or wheelchair.On 5-12-26 at 10:30 a.m. Resident #3's electronic clinical record was reviewed. Nursing, Social work, and physician Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide the appropriate size adult brief for one Resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 3 Residents. The findings include: For Resident #1, the facility staff applied an adult incontinence brief that was too small for the Resident causing discomfort and spilling of waste onto the Resident's bed Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; diabetes, cancer, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Resident #1's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4-05-24 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #1 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was also coded as requiring extensive to total dependence on one to two staff members to perform activities of daily living, such as hygiene, transferring, and bed mobility. The Resident was coded…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, Resident interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain the professional standards of medication administration in nursing practice for two Residents(Residents #1 and # 3) in a survey sample of 3 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to check finger stick blood sugar (FSBS), and failed to administer insulin for an insulin dependent Resident with Diabetes. Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; diabetes, cancer, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Resident #1's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4-05-24 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #1 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was also coded as requiring extensive to total dependence on one to two staff members to perform activities of daily living, such…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, Resident interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to prevent significant medication errors for one Resident (Residents #1) in a survey sample of 3 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to check finger stick blood sugar (FSBS), and failed to administer insulin for an insulin dependent Resident with Diabetes Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; diabetes, cancer, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Resident #1's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4-05-24 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #1 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was also coded as requiring extensive to total dependence on one to two staff members to perform activities of daily living, such as hygiene, transferring, and bed mobility. The Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, facility document review, clinical record review, staff interview, and Resident interview the facility staff failed to follow the menu and preferences of two Residents (Resident #1, and #2) in the survey sample of 3 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1, the tray ticket, and menu, were not followed for the lunch meal on 4-9-24. Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; diabetes, cancer, hypertension, and morbid obesity. Resident #1's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4-05-24 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #1 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was also coded as requiring extensive to total dependence on one to two staff members to perform activities of daily living, such as hygiene, transferring, and bed mobility. The Resident was coded as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards for medication administration for 1 resident, Resident #1, in a survey sample of 3 residents. The findings included: For Resident #1, facility staff failed to administer, and/or document medications as administered, as ordered by the physician on 7/16/23 and 7/26/23. On 11/13/23, Resident #1's clinical record was reviewed and revealed physician orders and medication administration documentation as follows: -Depakote Extended Release, 250mg, ordered to be given once a day at 12:00 PM--missed dose on 7/16/23 and 7/26/23. -Diltiazem HCl Extended Release, 300mg, ordered to be given once a day at 9:00 AM--missed dose on 7/16/23 and 7/26/23. -Lisinopril, 5mg, ordered to be given once a day at 8:00 AM--missed dose on 7/16/23. -Plavix, 75mg, ordered to be given once a day at 8:00 AM--missed dose on 7/16/23. -Hydralazine HCl,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to YAD HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $670K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA