No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Emporia Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

200 Weaver Avenue, Emporia, VA 23847 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (434) 634-6581 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (434) 634-6581 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Nov 2022Resident-funds citations (F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Nov 2022
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569, F0570)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (71) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
702 N Main St · (434) 634-7723 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
306 Weaver Ave · (434) 348-4987 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
126 Baker St · (434) 506-2044 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1155 Sussex Dr · (434) 336-7050

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.7%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.4%0.4%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.4%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.0%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.2%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.1%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.6%4.7%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control28.2%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table26.7%14.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.6%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit24.0%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.471.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.511.481.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

35.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 17% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF35.6%CMS range 22.4–52.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.6–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.2–12.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.461.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.27
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.17
RN hoursweekends
42.6%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 110.1 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.93 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.27 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.71 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.31 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2022-11-16)
19
at the previous standard inspection (2019-04-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

71 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 60 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #66) of 21 residents in the survey sample to prevent and identify an unable to stage sacral pressure wound resulting in harm. Resident #66's sacral wound was first identified as unable to stage with 100% slough (dead tissue) present in the wound bed. The findings included: Resident #66, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included multiple sclerosis, hypertension, anemia, and contractures. Her most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/19/17. She had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance with activities of daily living and was coded to be at risk to develop a pressure wound. On 1/24/18 at 10:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #66. She was lying in bed. She…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility record review, the facility failed to have evidence that alleged violations were investigated thoroughly for 1 of 28 residents in the sample, Resident #117 (R117).The findings include:For R117 the facility failed to thoroughly investigate all allegations regarding alleged abuse.Diagnoses for R117 include schizophrenia and osteoarthritis. On the most recent applicable Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/5/2024, R117 scored a 9 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating moderate cognitive impairment.A progress note in the clinical record dated 4/29/2024 stated that R117 made facility staff aware of allegations of abuse. R117 stated that a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 hit him in the head and threw him into a wheelchair. R117 stated that a second CNA, CNA #5, was present during this alleged incident and did not intervene. Review of the incident synopsis revealed that both CNA #4 and CNA #5 were both listed as alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for one of 28 residents in a survey sample, Resident #97. The findings include:The Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) inaccurately documented all treatments and medications were refused by Resident #97 (R97). R97 diagnoses include paraplegia, diabetes, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder requiring suprapubic catheter. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment 3/25/26 and indicated R97 was cognitively intact. On 6/1/2026 at 1:20 p.m. R97 requested to be interviewed by the surveyor. During the interview R97 reported that on 5/26/26 R97 did not receive medications or catheter flush from the evening nurse. R97 said because of this R97 called the police, the police came over and after interviewing R97 was told by the police that it was documented that he had refused medications. R97 verbalized he had not refused any medications and had asked the assigned certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the Nurse Practitioner and resident's Responsible Party immediately of a significant change condition for 1 resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 6 residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to notify the Nurse Practitioner and the Responsible Party of decrease in urinary output and fluid intake for Resident #1.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization from 7/16/25 to 8/6/25 for nausea and vomiting coffee-ground emesis. He presented with a persistent ileus (a temporary condition where one's intestine cannot push food and waste out of the body) with abdominal pain and distention. He was treated conservatively after small bowel obstruction was ruled out. The hospital discharge summary revealed his overall prognosis was guarded. Resident #1's diagnoses included but not limited to Ogilvie's Syndrome (a rare condition that causes a severe dilation of the large intestine without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure residents are free from significant medication error for 1 resident (#2) in a survey sample of 6 residents.For Resident #2 the facility staff failed to follow the physician orders for parameters on administering the drug Midodrine (an alpha-Adrenergic Agonist used to raise blood pressure).Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Interstitial pulmonary disease, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, dysphagia, Barretts esophagus, and generalized weakness. Resident #2's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/9/25 coded the resident as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 8 out of possible 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment.On 10/21/25 a review of the clinical record revealed that Resident #2 had orders that included the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure appropriate resident care and services were provided in accordance with accepted professional standards of care for 1 resident (Resident #1) in a survey sample of 6 residents. The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to assess for signs and symptoms of dehydration.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a hospitalization from 7/16/25 to 8/6/25 for nausea and vomiting, coffee-ground enemies. He presented with a persistent ileus (a temporary condition where one's intestine cannot push food and waste out of the body) with abdominal pain and distention. He was treated conservatively after small bowel obstruction was ruled out. The hospital discharge summary revealed his overall prognosis was guarded. Resident #1's diagnoses included but not limited to Ogilvie's Syndrome (a rare condition that causes a severe dilation of the large intestine without any physical obstruction. This leads to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, Family interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain the professional standards of nursing practice for one Resident (Residents #1) in a survey sample of 2 Residents. For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to send the Resident to the hospital for 32 hours after a fall with injury, notably chest bruising and obvious pain with facial grimacing upon palpation of the injury by a nurse Practitioner immediately following the injury. The findings included: Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; Schizophrenia, Stroke, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, depression, and hypertension. Resident #1's most recent MDS (minimum data set) was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #1 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was also coded as requiring extensive dependence on one staff member to perform activities of daily living, such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the family of a change in condition for one Resident (Resident # 4) in a survey sample of 8 residents. Findings included: For Resident # 4, the facility staff failed to notify the family of changes in condition related to eating. Resident # 4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus-type 2, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension and history of a stroke in 2017. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment tool with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 7/22/2023, coded Resident # 4 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It coded Resident # 4 as requiring extensive assistance of one staff person for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) except for eating which required supervision and set up only. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 10/11/2023 -10/13/2023 and 10/16/2023. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY two Residents (Resident # 2 and #6) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. Findings included: 1. For Resident # 2, the facility staff failed to develop a care plan with measurable objectives in regard to several identified focus areas. Resident # 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 2's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Heart failure, Vascular Dementia, and Dysphagia. Review of Resident # 2's care plan revealed goals that were not measurable. Examples included but were not limited to: Focus-Hypertension Interventions to remain in place to minimize the risk of complications related to hypertension through next review. Focus-Hyperthyroidism, Goal: interventions to remain in place to minimize the risk of complications related to hyperthyroidism through next review. Focus-Potential for impaired skin integrity, Goal-Interventions to remain in place to minimize the risk of impaired skin integrity through the next review Focus: Potential risk for further falls, Goal-Interventions to remain in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plans for 3 Residents (Residents # 1, #2, and # 3) of 8 Residents in the survey sample. The findings include: 1. For Resident # 1, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan to include a diagnosis of scabies and the use of contact precautions. On 10/11/2023, the facility Administrator and Assistant Director of Nursing were asked to provide a list of residents who had been diagnosed with a scabies infection. The Assistant Director of Nursing stated the infections were discovered during the month of May 2023. The Assistant Director of Nursing stated she was the Infection Preventionist at the facility and was responsible for reporting infections to the Health Department. A copy of the line listing was requested. A copy of the Scabies Outbreak Line List Final was received. Review of the facility's documentation of its line listing of infections reported to the local health department revealed documentation of scabies infections in May 2023.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure care and services met professional standards of quality for one Resident (Resident # 4) in a survey sample of 8 residents. Findings included: For Resident #4, the facility staff failed to assess and monitor for adverse reactions to the administration of several medications including antidepressants, antipsychotic medications, antihypertensives and a diuretic, resulting in dehydration, diminished Activities of Daily living functional abilities, and oversedation. Resident # 4 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to: Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus-type 2, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension and history of a stroke in 2017, The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment tool with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 7/22/2023, coded Resident # 4 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 60 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to ensure one Resident (Resident # 4) in a survey sample of 8 residents received care and services for Activities of Daily Living. (ADLs). Findings included: For Resident # 4, the facility staff failed to provide care and services for ADLs. Staff failed to document the provision of care for activities of daily living (ADLs) care on numerous dates and times. Resident # 4 was a [AGE] year-old with diagnoses including but not limited to: Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus-type 2, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension and history of a stroke in 2017. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment tool with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 7/22/2023, coded Resident # 4 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It coded Resident # 4 as requiring extensive assistance of one staff person for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) including toileting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure one Resident (Resident # 4) in a survey sample of 8 residents, received care and services to prevent and identify an infected pressure ulcer. Findings included: For Resident # 4, the facility staff failed to prevent and identify a Stage 2 pressure ulcer (1) that was found when emergently discharged to the hospital on 8/28/2023. The pressure ulcer was cultured at the hospital and revealed a Pseudomonas Aeruginosa infection, resulting in harm. Resident # 4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus-type 2, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Hypertension and history of a stroke in 2017. The admission MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment tool with an ARD (Assessment Review Date) of 7/22/2023, coded Resident # 4 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. It coded Resident # 4 as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for Residents who display or are diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty for one Resident (Resident #4) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #4 the facility staff failed to ensure that the Resident was seen by psychiatric (psych) services in order to provide a continuity of care after being discharged from the hospital where he was receiving psych services. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia to Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia, with psychotic disturbance. He has a history of Agitation and sexual behavior disturbance. His BIMS score of 00/15 indicates severe cognitive impairment. Prior to admission to this facility, he was followed by Psych while a patient at the Veterans Hospital. Excerpts from Resident #4's discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for Residents who display or are diagnosed with dementia for one Resident (Resident #4) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. The findings included. For Resident # 4 the facility staff failed to consult with a psychiatrist (psych) adding several psychotropic medications to his medication regimen. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia to Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia, with psychotic disturbance. He has a history of Agitation and sexual behavior disturbance. His BIMS score of 00/15 indicates severe cognitive impairment. Prior to admission to this facility, he was followed by Psych while a patient at the Veterans Hospital. Excerpts from Resident #4's discharge summary from the (Name of Hospital) are as follows: Key Findings: We consulted psychiatry and adjusted your medications to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for two Residents (Residents # 6 and # 3 ) in a survey sample of 8 residents. Findings included: 1. For Resident # 6, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration several times as ordered by the physician. Review of the clinical record was conducted 10/11/2023-10/13/2023. Review of the Progress Notes revealed the following documentation regarding medications being unavailable: Torsemide Oral Tablet 60 MG (milligrams) (Torsemide) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Edema -Order Date-08/25/2023 1640. The medication was unavailable 9/1/23, 9/5/23 and 9/6/23. Effective Date: 08/30/2023 20:03 Type: EMAR(Electronic Medication Administration Record) - Administration Note Text : Gabapentin Capsule 100 MG (milligrams) Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for Neuropathy awaiting medication. Review of the August 2023 and September 2023 Medical Administration Records revealed several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure that a Resident was free from unnecessary medications to include duplicate drug therapy for one Resident (Resident #4) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #4 the facility staff failed to ensure the Resident was free from duplicate drug therapy to include 2 SSRI's (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors), Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia to Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia, with psychotic disturbance. He has a history of Agitation and sexual behavior disturbance. His BIMS score of 00/15 indicates severe cognitive impairment. Prior to admission to this facility, he was followed by a psychiatrist (psych) while a patient at the (Name of) Hospital. Excerpts from Resident #4's discharge summary from the hospital are as follows: Key Findings: We consulted psychiatry and adjusted your…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure Resident was free from unnecessary psychotropic drug use for one Resident (Resident #4) in a survey sample of 8 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #4 the facility staff failed to prevent duplication of drugs, and failed to ensure PRN (as needed) anti-psychotic medication were limited to 14 days. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to dementia to Alzheimer's Disease and Vascular Dementia, with psychotic disturbance. He has a history of Agitation and sexual behavior disturbance. Excerpts from Resident #4's discharge summary from the hospital are as follows: Key Findings: We consulted psychiatry and adjusted your medications to help alleviate some behavioral symptoms of dementia. You will be discharged to a long-term care center to better help your needs. Discharge summary from the hospital included the following psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-16 · tag F0570 — pattern
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility record review, the facility staff failed to have a sufficient surety bond to assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility, affecting 85 of 93 facility Residents who had a patient trust account. The findings included: For 85 Residents, the facility staff failed to maintain a surety bond in a sufficient amount to assure the security of all personal funds deposited with the facility. On [DATE], during an entrance conference conducted with the facility Administrator, the survey team requested a copy of the facility surety bond and current Resident trust fund balance. On [DATE], the surety bond was reviewed and revealed that the coverage amount was for $125,000, but the bond expired/ended on [DATE]. The current Resident trust account balance was reviewed and revealed 85 Residents had open and active accounts with the facility. Of the 85 open accounts, 74 had an active balance, which totaled $126,453.02. On [DATE] at 8:56 AM, Surveyor B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy for 14 employees (Staff #3, 8, 11, 12, 16, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 32, 33, 34 and 35) in a sample of 25 employees reviewed. The findings included: The facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy with regards to the pre-hire screening of 14 employees, including license/certification verifications and/or criminal background checks. On 11/13/22, during the entrance conference conducted with the facility Administrator, a listing of employees hired since the facility's previous licensure survey was conducted in 2019 was requested. On 11/14/22, the list of new hires was reviewed and a sample was selected. The facility Administrator was asked to provide evidence of the 25 sampled staff's sworn statement, criminal background check and professional license verification conducted prior to or at the time of hire. On 11/15/22 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator was asked to explain why criminal background checks (CBCs) are performed for potential employees. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to remove expired medications and supplies from the supply that was available for administration to residents in 1 of 3 medication carts, and in 2 of 3 medication storage rooms inspected. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to remove multiple expired medications from the supply available to residents on 1 medication cart on the East Wing. On 11/14/22 at 09:51 AM, an inspection of the East A medication cart was conducted by Surveyor B, in the presence of LPN F. The cart contained the following medications: a. Sodium Bicarbonate 10 gr (grams) (650 mg [milligrams]) antacid, bottle of 1000 white tablets, which was opened and 1/2 full, which expired October 2022. b. A 1000 count bottle of Acetaminophen Regular strength pain reliever 325 mg, which was open and 1/2 full, expired October 2022. LPN F confirmed the medications were expired and, despite this, were available for administration. When asked why it is important to ensure medications are not expired, LPN F said, We…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow proper sanitation protocol to prevent a potential outbreak of foodborne illness for 5 out of 12 days in November 2022. The findings included: The facility staff failed to verify acceptable chemical sanitation level in the sanitation sink for all three meals on 11/04/2022, 11/07/2022, and 11/12/2022; and following the dinner meal on 11/05/2022, 11/06/2022, 11/08/2022, 11/10/2022, and 11/11/2022. On 11/13/2022 at 12:25 P.M. this surveyor observed the 3-compartment sink log. All three meals on 11/04/2022, 11/07/2022, and 11/12/2022, and the dinner meals on 11/05/2022, 11/06/2022, 11/08/2022, 11/10/2022, and 11/11/2022 were blank. There was no evidence the chemical sanitation level was checked to ensure adequate sanitation of pans. On 11/13/2022 at 4:00 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of findings. On 11/14/2022 at 9:50 A.M., the dietary manager was interviewed. When asked about the expectation for the sanitation log, the dietary manager stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement effective infection control practices for one out of one building, and in one of three care units. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to maintain an effective water management program to prevent the growth of legionella. Legionella was confirmed in 5 of the 20 sources tested in July 2022. Also, the facility staff failed to treat the sources as recommended by the state certified biological water testing center, and check the effectiveness of the treatment they implemented on 08/05/2022. 1. On 11/15/2022 at approximately 3:45 P.M., the water management program was reviewed with the administrator. When asked how their building water systems were assessed for potential legionella pathogens, the administrator stated that testing samples were sent out. When asked about the testing results, the Administrator provided a copy of the testing results dated 08/02/2022. According to the legend of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-11-16 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing in accordance with CDC (Centers for Disease Control) and CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) guidance/requirements during a facility wide COVID-19 Outbreak for facility staff and residents; and the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing for 2 residents, Residents #85 and #93, out of 2 newly admitted residents reviewed for COVID testing. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing on October 29, 2022 following the identification of a COVID-19 Outbreak on October 27, 2022. On 11/15/22, a group interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Infection Preventionist (IP). The DON stated the IP reported a resident had tested positive for COVID-19 on 10/26/22, and COVID-19 Outbreak broad-based testing began on 10/27/22 for all staff members and residents. The IP stated that the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to convey a resident's personal funds within 30 days of discharge to one resident, (Resident #303), in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #303, the facility staff did not issue a refund of trust funds within 30 days of the Resident's discharge. On [DATE], a review of the Resident trust account Trial Balance report revealed that Resident #303 had a negative account balance in the amount of -$917.41. Review of the electronic health record revealed that Resident #303 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #303 expired at the hospital. On [DATE] at 8:56 AM, Surveyor B conducted an interview with the Business Office Manager/Employee M. Employee M was asked about Resident #303's negative account balance. Employee M said, It is money that is due back to his account, they deducted his care cost twice. I've sent them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party for a change in condition for one Resident (Resident #80) in a sample size of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #80, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party when a new wound was discovered on 08/04/2022. On 11/14/2022 and 11/15/2022, Resident #80's clinical record was reviewed. An excerpt of a provider note dated 08/04/2022 at 8:41 A.M. under the header Assessment/Plan documented, Open wound to right sacral area-acute; new rec' [sic] given. The nursing progress notes from 08/04/2022 through 08/10/2022 were reviewed. There was no evidence the responsible party was notified. On 11/16/2022 at approximately 1:45 P.M., the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of findings. When asked about the expectation for responsible party notification of a new sacral wound, the DON stated the responsible party should have been notified. A review of the facility policy, Change in a Resident's Condition or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a homelike environment for one Resident (Resident #11) in a sample size of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #11, the facility staff failed to ensure comfortable water temperatures for personal hygiene and incontinence care. On 11/13/2022 at 1:15 P.M., Resident #11 was interviewed. When asked about any care concerns, Resident #11 indicated that water in the bathroom sink does not get hot. Resident #11 stated that staff knows about it and they use cold cloths with incontinence care. During the course of the interview, this surveyor ran the hot water in the sink for approximately 3 minutes. The water did not heat up and felt cooler than 98.6 degrees Fahrenheit. On Resident #11's quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/17/2022, the Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review Resident #11's care plan with a revision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that Residents are free from abuse and exploitation for 1 Resident (Resident #303) in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #303, the facility staff misappropriated the Resident's money by deducting funds from the Resident's trust account after the Resident's discharge, leaving the account in a negative balance, and preventing the facility staff from issuing a refund due to the Resident for over a year following the Residents discharge. Review of the electronic health record revealed that Resident #303 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #303 expired at the hospital. On [DATE], a review of the Resident trust account Trial Balance report revealed that Resident #303 had a negative account balance in the amount of -$917.41. On [DATE] at 8:56 AM, Surveyor B conducted an interview with the Business Office…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to permit a resident to return to the facility for one Resident (Resident #300) in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #300, the facility staff failed to permit the Resident to be readmitted to the facility after being discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #300's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: Paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and current episode manic severe with psychotic features. On [DATE], a clinical record review was conducted. This review revealed that Resident #300 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on [DATE]. The Resident was then readmitted on [DATE], and discharged on [DATE]. According to the nursing notes, Resident #300 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] for increased lethargy, slurred speech, and decreased oxygen saturation. Review of Resident #300's progress notes revealed entries…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, staff interviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 Residents (Resident #80, Resident #299) in a sample size of 37 Residents. The findings include: 1. For Resident #80, the facility staff failed to document assessment findings for a pressure ulcer. On 11/14/2022 and 11/15/2022, Resident #80's clinical record was reviewed. An excerpt of a provider note dated 08/04/2022 at 8:41 A.M documented, Open wound to right sacral area-acute; new rec' [sic] given. A weekly nursing skin assessment, Weekly Skin Review, dated 08/04/2022 at 1:10 P.M. documented that Resident #80's skin was intact. The nursing progress notes from 08/04/2022 through 08/10/2022 were reviewed. There was no evidence the newly discovered sacral wound was assessed, described, or measured. On 11/16/2022 at approximately 8:15 A.M., the Wound Nurse Practitioner (Employee P) and the Assistant Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a discharge summary to include recapitulation of stay for 1 resident (Resident #99) in the survey sample of 37 residents. The findings included: For Resident #99, the facility staff failed to complete a recapitulation (discharge summary) of care, after discharge from the facility on 8/9/22. Resident #99 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 8-9-22. Resident #99's clinical record was reviewed and revealed a discharge minimum data set assessment (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8-9-22. Resident #99 was discharged to the hospital on 8-9-22. The Resident's closed record was reviewed on 11-15-22. Neither a discharge summary, nor a recapitulation of stay was included in the clinical record. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the missing discharge summary at the end of day meeting on 11-15-22. On 11-16-22 at 10:30 a.m. the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide adequate nutrition and hydration for one Resident (Resident #99) in a survey sample of 37 residents. The findings included: For Resident #99 the facility staff knew for 2 days that the Resident was not eating nor drinking sufficient fluids. Staff did not intervene, and the Resident was subsequently hospitalized with dehydration, malnutrition, bowel impaction, and severe Hypernatremia (high sodium in the bloodstream). Resident #99 was first admitted to the facility on [DATE], and discharged on 8-9-22. Resident #99's clinical record was reviewed and revealed a discharge minimum data set assessment (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8-9-22. The document coded the Resident with severe cognitive impairment, unable to walk, unable to feed self, and extensive to total dependence on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident #99 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide influenza vaccines for 3 residents, Residents #5, #8, and #34, out of 5 residents reviewed for influenza immunization; and facility staff failed to provide a pneumococcal vaccine for 1residents, Resident #8, out of 5 residents reviewed for pneumococcal immunization. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide influenza immunization for Residents #5, #8, #34, and #77. 1a. Resident #5, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], had no clinical assessment with regard to current influenza immunization status, no evidence of being offered immunization against influenza, and no documentation of resident refusal or medical contraindication. On 11/14/22, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), who accessed the clinical record for Resident #5 and verified the findings. A review of the facility policy, Vaccination of Residents, dated October 2019 revealed, in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-16 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff record review, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide COVID-19 immunization for 1 resident, Resident #77, in a survey sample of 5 residents reviewed for COVID-19 vaccination. The findings include: The facility staff failed to offer and/or provide a second primary COVID-19 vaccine to Resident #77. Resident #77, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the clinical record revealed a COVID-19 Vaccination Screening & Encounter Form, which documented the consent and administration of COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna (0.5ml), 1st dose on 9/13/21. Resident #77 had no documentation with regard to an offer to provide a second primary dose of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine, education, or documentation of resident refusal or medical contraindication. On 11/14/22, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), who verified the findings for Resident #77. The DON stated a second COVID-19 vaccine should have been offered to Resident #77 in order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide quality of care for three Residents (Resident #53, Resident #81, and Resident #41) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. 1. For Resident #53, the facility staff failed to assess the resident to determine the cause of her distress (i.e. crying), and seek appropriate treatment. The resident was documented as crying for 9 of 16 days. 2. For Resident #81, the facility staff failed to identify, assess, treat and monitor a skin wound on his left upper forearm. 3a. For Resident #41, the facility staff failed to document the administration of multiple medications during April, 2019. 3b. For Resident #41, the facility staff failed to administer five doses of physician-ordered insulin in April, 2019. The findings included: 1. For Resident #53, the facility staff failed to assess the resident to determine the cause of her distress (i.e. crying), and seek appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. 1. Facility staff failed to provide a sanitizing solution with appropriate concentration levels to ensure adequate sanitization during manual dishwashing. 2. Facility staff failed to properly label and date food items stored in the walk-in freezer. 3. Facility staff failed to follow appropriate hygiene/sanitary procedures by not wearing a hairnet in the kitchen. The Findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to provide a sanitizing solution with appropriate concentration levels to ensure adequate sanitization during manual dishwashing. On 04/16/2019 at approximately 08:00 AM, a tour of the kitchen took place and a three part sink was observed with the right compartment approximately 2/3 full with clear water which the Dietary Assistant (Other Employee A) described as the sanitizing solution. She stated that the solution was prepared using chlorine bleach just a few minutes earlier in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, facility staff failed to complete an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) for one (Residents # 60) of 3 sampled residents. 1. For Resident # 60, the facility staff did not complete an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) timely. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 60, the facility staff did not complete an Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) timely. Resident # 60 was chosen from a list of residents discharged in the previous 6 months. On 4/17/2019 at 9:00 AM, the Business Office Manager was asked for a copy of the Advance Beneficiary Notice for Resident # 60. The Business Office Manager presented a form that she stated was the ABN. The reviewed form showed Form CMS-10123 NOMNC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) form was not signed by the resident or the authorized representative. The form had information documented in the additional information section that stated Your record shows the services you need no longer meet Medicare guidelines to be given in a skilled nursing facility (SNF). The guidelines require that you need daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide a clean environment for one resident (Resident #81) in a sample size of 35 residents. The bathroom in Resident #81's room had mold on the floor, had a strong odor of mold and urine, and the hot water handle on Resident #81's room sink was loose. The findings included: Resident #81, an [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, hypertension, and dysphasia. Resident #81's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/19/2019 was coded as a quarterly review. Cognitive skills for daily decision-making was coded as severely impaired. Toileting and personal hygiene were coded as total dependence on staff. On 04/16/2019 at approximately 9:55 AM, a survey of Resident #81's room was conducted. Upon opening the bathroom door, there was a strong odor of mold and urine detected. There was urine in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for one resident (Resident #72), in the survey sample of 35 residents, to notify the Ombudsman of a hospital transfer. The facility staff failed to notify the Ombudsman that Resident #72 had been transferred to the hospital. The Findings included: Resident #72 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #72's diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Congestive Heart Failure, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Hemiplegia. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/22/19 was reviewed. It coded Resident #72 as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 15, indicating that there was no cognitive impairment. On 4/17/19 a review was conducted of Resident #72's clinical record. The Nurse's note read, 4/5/19. 11:25 (AM). Resident was sent to ER (Emergency Room) on previous day for evaluation of rash spreading on left upper leg.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed to ensure that a Level II PASARR (Pre admission Screening And Resident Review) was performed prior to admission for 1 Resident (# 45) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. For Resident #45, the facility staff failed to obtain a PASARR prior to admission. The findings included; Resident #45 an [AGE] year old man admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of but not limited to unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, altered mental status, Major depressive disorder, Psychotic and behavioral factors associated with disorder classified elsewhere, Parkinsonism, and Osteoarthritis. On 4/17/19 during clinical record review it was noted that Resident #45 had a PASARR Level One that stated: 1. Does the individual meet nursing facility criteria? YES 2. Does the individual have a current serious mental illness (MD)? YES a. Is this major mental disorder diagnosable under DSM IV (e.g.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to develop comprehensive, resident-centered care plan for 2 residents (Resident #14, Resident #81) in a sample size of 35 residents. 1. For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to develop and implement an Activities program. 2. For Resident #81, the facility staff failed to develop a plan of care for a skin wound on his left upper forearm. The findings included: 1. For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to develop and implement an Activities program. Resident #14, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/15/2019 was coded as a quarterly review. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 7 out of a possible 15 indicative of severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan for three residents (Resident #22, Resident #43, and Resident #81) in a survey sample of 35 residents. 1. For Resident #22, the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan to include the physician ordered, pureed diet with nectar thick liquids. 2. For Resident #43, the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan to include the physician ordered palm guards. 3 For Resident #81, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan on the status of an anti-anxiety medication. The findings included: 1. For Resident #22, the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan to include the physician ordered, pureed diet with nectar thick liquids. Resident #22, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #22 included but were not limited to: unspecified psychosis, unspecified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to plan and implement Activities for one resident (Resident #14) out of a sample size of 35 residents. The findings included: Resident #14, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Resident #14's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/15/2019 was coded as a quarterly review. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 7 out of a possible 15 indicative of severe cognitive impairment. Toileting, dressing, and personal hygiene were coded as total dependence on staff. On 04/16/2019 at approximately 8:40 AM, Resident #14 was observed sleeping in his bed with the head of the bed elevated approximately 45 degrees. Resident #14 was wearing a white, short-sleeved t-shirt and covered with a blanket from the waist down. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide services to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one resident (Resident #22) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. For Resident #22, the facility staff failed to provide prevalon boot to left foot, as ordered by the physician, to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer. The findings included: Resident #22, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #22 included but were not limited to: unspecified psychosis, unspecified intellectual disabilities, difficulty in walking, type 2 diabetes, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, anxiety, and unspecified convulsions. Resident #22's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/23/19, was coded as a significant change assessment. Resident #22 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 6, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide services to prevent the decline in ROM (range of motion) for one resident (Resident #43) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. For Resident #43, the facility staff failed to provide palm guards, as ordered by the physician, to prevent the decline in ROM. The findings included: Resident #43, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #43 included but were not limited to: age related osteoporosis, glaucoma, dementia, pick's disease and unspecified kidney failure. Resident #43's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 2/22/19 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #43 was coded as having severe cognitive impairment based on a staff assessment, a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) was not able to be conducted. Resident #43 was coded as being total care, dependent upon one staff member, for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards on one of three nursing units. The facility staff failed to lock and secure a housekeeping cart on the 200 hall, which included chemicals and a sharp object. The findings included: During facility rounds on 4/17/19 at 9:23am a housekeeping cart was observed, unattended outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. Residents, visitors, and staff were observed in the hallway that could access the contents of the housekeeping cart. The cabinet door, where chemicals and sharp objects were stored, was observed to be ajar. When opened, the following contents were observed: 1. Enzym D- a cleaning chemical 2. a roll of trash bags 3. a pair of scissors with a sharp, pointed end 4. a toilet bowl brush 5. a scrapper (rectangle shaped metal (approximately 3 long, 2 wide), with a plastic handle) 6. hand sanitizer On 4/17/19 at 9:25am an interview was conducted with a housekeeper, other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, and hospital discharge record review the facility staff failed to ensure Residents free from unnecessary medications for 1 Resident (#77) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. For Resident #77 the facility staff failed to hold or discontinue Colace 100 (Milligrams) mg twice daily [given for constipation] when the Resident had loose stools since readmission from the hospital. The findings included; Resident #77 an [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to left and right above knee amputation, Hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (stroke), Contracture multiple sites, Pressure ulcer (unstageable), Diabetes type 2, and chronic Atrial fibrillation and history of pacemaker. Resident #77's most recent (Minimum Data Set) MDS coded as a PPS 60 Day Scheduled Assessment, codes Resident as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS Score of 0. A score of 0 indicates the Resident has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident representative interview, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide dental services for one resident (Resident #53) in a survey sample of 35 residents. The facility staff failed to provide routine dental services for Resident #53. The findings included: Resident # 53 had an original admission on [DATE], with a recent readmission on [DATE]. Resident #53's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Parkinson's, dysphagia, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, vascular dementia, GERD, and C4 Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Resident #53's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/6/19, was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #53 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired. For activities of daily living (ADL's) to include transfers, dressing, eating, personal hygiene, toileting and bathing, Resident #53 was totally dependent on one staff member for care. On 4/16/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide a therapeutic diet, as ordered by the physician, for one resident (Resident #22) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. For Resident #22, the facility staff failed to nectar thick liquids as ordered by the physician. The findings included: Resident #22, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #22 included but were not limited to: unspecified psychosis, unspecified intellectual disabilities, difficulty in walking, type 2 diabetes, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hypertension, anxiety, and unspecified convulsions. Resident #22's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/23/19, was coded as a significant change assessment. Resident #22 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate medical record for 2 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #43) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. 1. For Resident #22 the facility staff failed to conduct a quarterly review of Resident #22, to determine that placement in a secure unit continued to be appropriate for the resident. 2. For Resident #43 the facility staff failed to conduct a quarterly review of Resident #43 to determine that placement in a secure unit continued to be appropriate for the resident. The findings included: 1. For Resident #22 the facility staff failed to conduct a quarterly review to determine that continued placement in a secure unit was appropriate. Resident #22, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a most recent readmission on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #22 included but were not limited to: unspecified psychosis, unspecified intellectual disabilities, difficulty in walking, type 2 diabetes, gastro-esophageal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee consisting of the minimum members in two of four quarters from April 2018- March 2019. 1. For the April 24, 2018 Quarterly QAA meeting, the administrator was not in attendance and the Administrator and Director of Nursing did not attend the January 28, 2019 Quarterly QAA meeting. The findings included: 1. For the April 24, 2018 Quarterly QAA meeting, the administrator was not in attendance and the Administrator and Director of Nursing did not attend the January 28, 2019 Quarterly QAA meeting. On 4/19/2019 at 11:10 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing and Risk Manager who both stated the facility held quarterly meetings as scheduled as well as monthly meetings to discuss quality assurance. The Director of Nursing stated she and the administrator attended the QAA meetings each quarter as scheduled. On 4/18/19 at 11:15 AM, a review of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee was conducted with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure infection prevention for 1 Resident (Resident #36) in a survey sample of 35 Residents. For Resident #36, the facility staff failed to ensure a partially full urinal was not present by his plate of food during meal services. The findings included; Resident # 36 a [AGE] year old man admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of but not limited to Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension, Renal Failure, and Schizophrenia. Resident #75's last (Minimum Data Set) MDS (screening tool) coded Resident as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. The Resident is also coded as being incontinent and using a urinal at bedside. On 4/16/19 at 8:00 AM during initial tour, Resident #36 was sitting on the side of bed with bed table in front of him eating breakfast. Directly to the right of his plate was a urinal half…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-04-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident representative interview, and staff interview the facility staff failed to maintain equipment in safe operating condition for one resident (Resident #53) in a survey sample of 35 residents. The facility staff failed to maintain the bed and room in safe repair for Resident #53. The findings included: Resident # 53 had an original admission on [DATE], with a recent readmission on [DATE]. Resident #53's diagnoses included but were not limited to: Parkinson's, dysphagia, hyperglycemia, hypokalemia, vascular dementia, GERD, and C4 Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Resident #53's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/6/19, was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #53 was coded as being severely cognitively impaired. For activities of daily living (ADL's) to include transfers, dressing, eating, personal hygiene, toileting and bathing, Resident #53 was totally dependent on one staff member for care. On 4/16/19 at 02:41 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. For Resident # 64 the facility failed to document medications as having been administered. Resident #64, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was an annual assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/19/17. He was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicting no cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #64's January 2018 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed. On the 3-11 shift, there were multiple instances where the nurse failed to document the administration of medications. Medications were not documented as having been administered on the following occasions: Docusate 9:00 p.m.: 1/4/18, 1/15/18, 1/17/18 and 1/22/18 Acetaminophen 8:00 p.m.: : 1/4/18, 1/15/-1/17/18, 1/22/18 Alfuzosin 8:00 p.m.: 1/4/18, 1/15/, 1/17/18, 1/22/18 Atorvastatin 8:00 p.m. : 1/4/18,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide activities for six residents (Residents # 65, 47, 46, 83, 10 and 60) in a survey sample of 21 residents. 1. For Resident # 65, the facility staff failed to provide Activities to residents during survey 1/24/2018 through 1/26/2018. 2. For Resident # 47, the facility staff failed to provide Activities during 3 days of survey 1/24-1/26/2018. 3. For Resident # 46, the facility staff failed to provide Activities during 3 days of survey 1/24-1/26/2018. 4. For Resident # 83, the facility staff failed to provide Activities during 3 days of survey 1/24-1/26/2018. 5. No meaningful activities were assessed for, nor planned for Resident #10. 6. No meaningful activities were assessed for, nor planned for Resident #60. Findings included: During the first 3 days of survey on January 24, 25 and 26, 2018, there were no Activities observed being conducted in the facility. On all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #64) of 21 residents in the survey sample to ensure pharmacy recommendations were acted upon. For Resident #64, the pharmacist recommended that the facility obtain a digoxin level nine times before the level was obtained. The findings included: Resident #64, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was an annual assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/19/17. He was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicting no cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. The pharmacist completed the monthly Drug Regimen Review (DRR) form for Resident #64. The forms were filed in the resident record. In addition, the pharmacist provided the Director of Nursing (DON) with a print out of all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2018-01-29 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure five Residents were free from significant medication error (Residents #10, 29, 40, 83, and 47) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. 1. For Resident #10, the facility failed to administer anti seizure medication as ordered by a physician. 2. For Resident #29, the facility failed to administer insulin as ordered by a physician. 3. For Resident #40, the facility failed to administer anti seizure medication as ordered by a physician. 4. For Resident # 83, the facility staff failed to document the administration of Insulin for Diabetic Management and Anti-seizure medications. 5. For Resident # 47, the facility staff failed to document the administration of anti-seizure medications as ordered by the physician. The findings included: 1. Resident #10, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; left tibia fracture with surgical repair infection and revision of implanted device,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-01-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #77) of 21 residents in the survey sample to ensure the resident had been assessed to self administer medications. Resident #77's medications were left at the bedside. She took the medications without supervision. The findings included: Resident #77, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included chronic pain, dysphagia, breast cancer, cerebrovscular disease, and anxiety. Her most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 1/3/18. She was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. She required limited assistance with activities of daily living. On 1/24/18 at 10:20 a.m., Resident #77 was in her room. She was heard coughing repeatedly. Upon entrance to the room, Resident #77 was seated in her wheel chair in front of the overbed table. On top…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to notify the responsible party of falls for 1 Resident (Resident #60) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident #60, the facility staff failed to notify the Responsible party of recurring falls. The findings included: Resident #60, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; stroke, diabetes, drug and alcohol abuse, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. Resident #60's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12-15-17 was coded as a full admission assessment. Resident #60 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or cognitively intact. This was an error, as the Resident was not cognitively intact. Resident #60 was also coded as requiring extensive assistance of one staff member to perform activities of daily living, such as bed mobility, transferring, eating, locomotion, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-01-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #65) of 21 residents in the survey sample to ensure personal privacy. For Resident #65, the facility staff failed to knock on the door, and or announce themselves prior to entering the bedroom. The Findings included: Resident #65 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #65's diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder, Seizures, Hemiplegia, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Annual Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/19/17, coded Resident #65 as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 1, indicating severely impaired cognition. On 1/24/18 at 9:00 A.M. an observation was conducted of the medication pass. Licensed Practical Nurse A was observed entering Resident #65's room in order to wash her hands. LPN A entered to the bedroom without knocking or announcing herself to either Resident #65 or his roommate. LPN A quickly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation and Staff Interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment for one resident (Resident #21) in a sample of 21 residents. For Resident #21, the right arm of the wheel chair was torn and taped. The findings included: Resident #21 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident #21's diagnoses included: Hypothyroidism, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's Disease, other chronic pain, essential hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease with esophagitis, Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of the knees, difficulty walking, and lack of coordination. Resident #21's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment was a Quarterly Assessment with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/09/17. The assessment coded Resident #21 with a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status, an evaluation of cognitive status) score of 8, indicating Moderate Impairment. On 1/24/18, Resident #21 was observed in his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete an accurate MDS (minimum data set) RAI (Resident Assessment Instrument) for two Residents (Resident #60 and Resident #66) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident #60, the facility staff failed to accurately code number of falls since admission (1900A), cognitive status (C0500) in the admission MDS, and Bowel and bladder Continence was also inaccurate from comparison between the care plan, MDS, and the CAA's. The findings included: Resident #60, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; stroke, diabetes, drug and alcohol abuse, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. Resident #60's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12-15-17 was coded as a full admission assessment. Resident #60 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or cognitively intact. This was an error, as the Resident was not cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-01-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a summary of the care and services for the Resident, to the Resident's Responsible party in a manner that was understandable to that individual. Also, the facility staff did not give updated interventions as they became available, for one Resident (Resident #60) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident #60, the facility staff failed to provide the Responsible party with a baseline care plan of services, and failed to provide the Responsible party with revisions of care plan interventions as they became available and necessary. The findings included: Resident #60, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; stroke, diabetes, drug and alcohol abuse, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. Resident #60's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12-15-17 was coded as a full admission assessment. Resident #60 was coded as having a BIMS (brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for two residents (Resident #60 and Resident #21) in a survey sample of 21 residents. 1. For Resident #60, the facility staff signed as having completed the comprehensive care plan, and failed to address all of the care areas triggered in the MDS assessment. 2. For Resident #21, the comprehensive care plan did not document that the resident suffered from chronic pain. The findings included: Resident #60, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; stroke, diabetes, drug and alcohol abuse, high blood pressure and high cholesterol. Resident #60's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12-15-17 was coded as a full admission assessment. Resident #60 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 15 out of a possible 15, or cognitively intact. This was an error, as the Resident was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide diabetic management for one resident (Resident # 83) in a survey sample of 21 residents. For Resident # 83, the facility staff failed to obtain Finger Stick Blood Sugars (FSBS) and administer Insulin as ordered by the physician. Findings included: Resident #83 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included but were not limited to Vascular Dementia with behavioral disturbances, Diabetes and Complete Traumatic Amputation of left lower leg. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was an admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 10/19/2018. The MDS coded Resident #83 as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15/15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident # 83 was also coded as requiring limited to total assistance of one staff member for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The only exception to this was eating, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-01-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management was provided to two residents (Resident #21 and Resident #77) in a sample of 21 Residents. 1. For Resident #21, facility Staff failed to offer physician ordered topical cream and other, non-pharmacological, pain control interventions. 2. For Resident #77, the facility staff failed assess pain and failed to administer pain medication when the resident expressed that she was in pain. The Findings Included: 1. For Resident #21, facility Staff failed to offer physician ordered topical cream and other, non-pharmacological, pain control interventions. Resident #21's diagnoses included: Hypothyroidism, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances, major depressive disorder, Parkinson's Disease, other chronic pain, essential hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease with esophagitis, Bilateral Primary Osteoarthritis of the knees, difficulty walking,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #64) of 21 residents in the survey sample to ensure the resident was free from unnecessary medications. For Resident #64, Cardizem (blood pressure medication) was administered when it should have been held. The findings included: Resident #64, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included diabetes, chronic kidney disease, pressure ulcer, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was an annual assessment with an assessment reference date of 12/19/17. He was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 15 indicting no cognitive impairment. He required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. Resident #64 had a physician order dated 12/14/17 for Cardizem 1 tab by mouth 3 times a day- check pulse before dosing, hold for pulse less than 60 and notify doctor. The January 2018 Medication Administration Record (MAR) was reviewed. On 1/3/18 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was free from un-necessary medications for two residents, (Resident #71 and Resident #15) in a survey sample of 21 residents. 1. Resident #71's Ativan PRN (as needed) antianxiety medication was administered without assessing the resident at the end of every 14 day continued use, and renewing the PRN order every 14 days. 2. For Resident #15, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident was free from unnecessary medications. The findings included: 1. Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included; Alzheimer's Dementia, left hip fracture with repair and dementia with behavioral disturbance, psychosis, anxiety, osteoporosis, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Resident #71's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12-26-17 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #71 was coded as having no BIMS (brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. A fan with dust caked on the back of the frame was found blowing air over the area where dishes were washed and racked to dry. The findings included: An initial tour of the Kitchen was conducted on 1/24/18 at 9:06 am. During tour, it was observed that several wall-mounted fans were in use circulating air throughout the kitchen. One fan overlooking the dishwashing and drying area was observed to have thick dust caked on the rear of the housing covering the blades, in the air intake area. Inspection of the ice machine in the kitchen revealed that there was no air gap between the drainage pipe and floor drain. The far end of the drain pipe coming from the rear of the ice machine was resting inside the lip of the floor drain. The issues with the Kitchen were reviewed with the Kitchen Manager on 1/29/18 at approximately 10:50. The manager stated that a work order would be placed to have the fan cleaned. No further information was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed, for two residents (Residents #10, and #60) to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record in the survey sample of 21 residents. 1. No meaningful activity records existed in the clinical record for Resident #10. 2. No meaningful activity records existed in the clinical record for Resident #60. The findings included: 1. Resident #10, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included; left tibia fracture with surgical repair infection and revision of implanted device, hypertension, seizures, contractures, and congestive heart failure. Resident #10's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1-17-18 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident #10 was coded as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 13 out of a possible 15, or, mild to no cognitive impairment. Resident #10 was also coded as requiring extensive to total assistance of staff to perform…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed for 1 resident (Resident #65) of 21 residents in the survey sample to practice appropriate hand washing prior to medication administration. And, the facility staff failed to have air gaps on the ice machines in the kitchen and on Unit 1. 1. For Resident #65, the facility staff failed to knock on the door, and or announce themselves prior to entering the bedroom. 2. The facility failed to have air gaps on the ice machines in the Kitchen and on Unit 1. The Findings included: Resident #65 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #65's diagnoses included Major Depressive Disorder, and Hypertension. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/4/17, coded Resident #65 as sometimes being able to understand and be understood by others. On 1/24/18 at 9:00 A.M. an observation was conducted of the medication pass. Licensed Practical Nurse A was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to YAD HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 51.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
EMPORIA OPERATING HOLDING LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2022
ALTER, TZVIIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST99%since 03/01/2022
SCOTT, SHERRYIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2022
SUKENIK, CHARNEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 03/01/2022

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$539K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 7%Other / private 14%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $539K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$268per resident / day
operating cost
$8,151per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$297per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495375. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2022-11-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next