Asheboro Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 92.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.35 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.86 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.73 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.39 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-04-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff, Nurse Practitioner (NP), Medical Director (MD) interviews and record review, the facility failed to have systems in place to identify a contracture which resulted in an avoidable wound where 3 fingernails on the resident's left hand punctured 2 areas into the palm of his contracted left hand requiring the need for wound care. The facility also failed to complete and document weekly assessments of the wound (Resident #70). This was for 1 of 2 residents reviewed providing care according to professional standards of practice. The findings included: 1. Resident #70 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #70 had severe cognitive impairment, was not coded for rejection of care, required extensive staff assistance with personal hygiene and he was coded for no limitation in range of motion to his upper extremities. Resident #70's care plan dated 5/2/22 last revised on 11/1/22 read he refused…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately in the area of falls for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #97) reviewed for MDS accuracy.The findings included:Resident #97 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia.A review of Resident #97's medical record revealed she had falls on 06/25/25 and 07/02/25 with no injuries. Resident #97 also had falls on 07/06/25 and 07/11/25 with minor injuries.A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 07/29/25, indicated Resident #97's cognition was severely impaired and was coded for one fall with no injury since the last assessment (quarterly dated 06/24/25).An interview was conducted with the MDS Coordinator on 08/13/25 at 1:21 PM. The MDS Coordinator reviewed the MDS assessment dated [DATE] as well as Resident #97's medical record. The MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #97 had 4 falls since the last assessment on 06/24/25 and should have been coded for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, the facility failed to refer residents (Residents #2 and Resident #66) for a level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for newly diagnosed serious mental illness for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR.1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar type depression, dementia, anxiety disorder, and frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder. She was admitted with a level 1 PASRR as of 10/25/24 and no further screening was required unless a significant change occurred to suggest a diagnosis of mental illness. Record review revealed Resident #2 was diagnosed on [DATE] with schizoaffective disorder. There was no evidence that a referral for level II PASRR screening was completed. Resident #2's annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicated she was not currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have a serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or related condition. An interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to follow a urology order to change the indwelling urinary catheter monthly for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for urinary catheters (Resident #47).The findings included: Resident #47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included obstructive and reflux uropathy (condition where urine flow is blocked or reversed) and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (a condition where the nerves controlling bladder function are damaged). A review of Resident #47's medical record indicated he was admitted from the hospital on 5/16/25 and had been utilizing a urinary catheter while at home. A review of Resident #47's physician orders included the following: - An order dated 5/16/25 for indwelling catheter care- cleanse with soap and water every shift. - An order dated 5/16/25 to monitor the urinary catheter output every shift. - An order dated 5/20/25 to change the indwelling urinary catheter when occluded or leaking. - An order dated 5/21/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, Registered Dietitian (RD) and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the enteral tube feed (a method of supplying nutrition through a feeding tube that goes directly into the stomach or small intestine) formula was specified in the active physician's order for Resident #3. This failure had been ongoing since June 2025. In addition, the facility failed to store a plastic enteral feeding syringe with the plunger separated from the barrel of the syringe for Resident #11 and Resident #88 which had the potential for bacterial growth and contamination. The deficient practice affected 3 of 4 residents reviewed for enteral feeding management (Resident #3, Resident #11 and Resident #88).The findings included: 1. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included a history of a stroke and diabetes type 2. A review of Resident #3's physician orders included the following:- - An order dated 1/18/25 through 6/18/25 for Glucerna 1.5 calories via a pump at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the prescribed rate (Resident #88) and failed to secure two oxygen cylinders stored in a resident's room (Resident #12) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #88 and #12).The findings included: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #88 had impaired memory and severely impaired decision-making skills. She was coded with the use of oxygen. A review of Resident #88’s active physician orders included an order dated 5/27/25 for oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula as needed for shortness of breath. On 8/10/25 at 2:49 PM, Resident #88 was observed lying in bed with her eyes closed and oxygen flowing via a nasal cannula. The oxygen regulator on the concentrator was set at 1.5 liters flow when viewed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and Nurse Practitioner (NP) and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement their policies and procedures for hand hygiene when Nurse #1 failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during 2 of 3 medication administration observations and failed to perform hand hygiene before donning gloves and after glove removal during administration of eye drops. This deficient practice was for 1 of 5 staff members observed for infection control practices (Nurse #1).A review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration (not dated): Preparation instructions stated in part: Perform hand hygiene before preparing and administering medications. A review of the facility policy for administering eye drops (not dated) stated in part: perform hand hygiene, apply gloves, administer eye drops, remove gloves, and perform hand hygiene.A continuous observation was started on 08/13/25 at 8:11 AM and ended at 8:26 AM of Nurse #1 preparing and administering Resident #60 and Resident #48's medications. Nurse #1 was observed at the medication cart collecting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident # 82 was admitted on [DATE] with cumulative diagnoses of depression anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbances, unspecified psychosis and affective mood disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #82 had moderate cognitive impairment, exhibited no behaviors and was coded for the use of an antipsychotic and an antidepressant. Review of Resident #82 September 2024 Physician orders included the following order dated 4/23/24: Seroquel (antipsychotic) Extended Release 24 hour 50 milligrams give one tablet by mouth in the afternoon for dementia with mood/psychotic disturbances. Another order dated 8/1/24 read Sertraline (antidepressant) 50 milligrams give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for dementia with behaviors, depression and anxiety. Review of the medication administration records (MARs) from November 1, 2023 to September 2024 included an order that was not included on the monthly Physician orders that read: Is resident free from side effects of psychotherapeutic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff, Administrator, resident, Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 and Consultant Pharmacist interviews, the facility failed to identify the targeted clinical behaviors and side effects to be monitored for the use of psychotropic medications for Resident's #82, #73 and #68. The facility also failed to complete a baseline abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) with the initiation of a newly prescribed antipsychotic for Resident #145. This was for 4 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The findings included: 1. Resident # 82 was admitted on [DATE] with cumulative diagnoses of depression anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbances, unspecified psychosis and affective mood disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #82 had moderate cognitive impairment, exhibited no behaviors and was coded for the use of an antipsychotic and an antidepressant. Review of Resident #82's comprehensive care included a care area initiated on 10/30/23 and revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to revise a smoking care plan to reflect a resident's level of supervision needed for smoking for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for smoking. The findings included: Resident #77 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of Resident #77's quarterly smoking assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a safe smoker and did not require supervision. Review of Resident #77's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL). Review of Resident #77's care plan revised on 7/5/24 revealed the resident required supervision when smoking. An interview with the MDS coordinator on 9/4/24 at 9:28 am revealed Residents #77's care plan should have reflected the resident being an independent smoker and edited when the smoking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to transcribe the correct medication administration route for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for gastric feeding tube (Resident #45). The findings included: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included traumatic brain injury, history of a stroke, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and presence of a feeding tube. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #45 had severe cognitive impairment and received all nutrition and fluids via a feeding tube. Review of the active care plan, last reviewed 7/16/24, revealed Resident #45 required tube feeding for all nutrition and fluids. The active September 2024 physician orders included an order dated 6/20/24 for Guaifenesin Liquid 100 milligrams per 5 milliliters. Give 20 milliliters by mouth three times a day for cough/congestion. All other medications were written to be provided through the gastric feeding tube. The physician orders indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to YAD HEALTHCARE — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $96K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC