Center At Centennial, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 779 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 293 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.10 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 73.5 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.92 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.95 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.08 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (#1) of three residents reviewed for accidents out of 15 sample residents received adequate supervision and services to prevent an accident. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness (intracranial bleeding between the brain and the skull), muscle weakness, aphasia (loss of the power of speech), hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body), Parkinson's disease (a condition that affects muscle control and movement), acute pain due to trauma and a history of falling. Resident #1 was status post [NAME] holes (small holes that a neurosurgeon makes in the skull to help relieve pressure on the brain when fluid, such as blood, builds up and compresses brain tissue) of subdural hematoma with surgical incision on the left side of his head with staples in place. On 4/15/24, certified nurse aide (CNA) #1 and CNA #2 transferred Resident #1 via the hoyer lift (mechanical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-01-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that the were unavoidable for one (#24) of four residents out of 40 sample residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke), abnormal posture and muscle weakness. Resident #24 skin was assessed at admission on [DATE] as not having any pressure areas identified. The facility identified the resident at low risk for developing pressure ulcers, however per the 12/17/21 minimum data assessment, he was identified at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The facility failed to have preventative interventions in place to ensure Resident #24's feet were offloaded, failed to provide showers as preferred (cross-reference F561) and failed to complete all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2022-01-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to manage pain in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for one (#221) of two residents out of 40 sample residents. Resident #221, who had diagnoses of low back pain, compression fractures in her lumbar and thoracic vertebrae, and left upper quadrant (abdominal) pain was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident stated she had back pain and did not like to get out of bed much because she had more pain when she moved. The resident also stated that she ate most of her meals lying down in her bed because she had less pain when she was lying in bed. The comprehensive pain assessment completed upon admission to the facility documented the resident had sharp, continuous left flank pain which worsened with movement and made activities of daily living (those skills required to manage one's basic physical needs, including personal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program that included antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for two (#25 and #31) of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use out of 33 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure clinical signs and symptoms of an infection were identified and/or culture results were obtained prior to the administration of antibiotics for Resident #25 and Resident #31. Findings include: I. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Antibiotic Prescribing and Usage in Hospitals and Long-term Care, dated 2019, was retrieved on 10/24/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/hcp/core-elements/hospital.html. It read in pertinent part, Implement policies that apply in all situations to support antibiotic prescribing to include specifying the dose, duration and indication for all courses of antibiotics so that they are readily identifiable. Implement facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were kept free from significant medication errors for two (#2 and #3) of three residents reviewed for medication errors out of 15 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Residents #2 and #3 received medications as scheduled according to the physician's orders which resulted in significant medications errors. Findings include: I. Facility policy The 6 (six) Medication Administration Rights policy, undated, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/30/24 at 1:28 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Medications should be administered at the time indicated by the prescribing physician. Acceptable practice is to use a one-hour window time frame. Medications can be given one hour before or one hour after the prescribed time. II. Resident #2 A. Resident status Resident #2, age [AGE], was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the July 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure food was labeled, dated, and monitored in refrigerators; -Ensure the kitchen equipment were clean and sanitary; -Ensure staff were utilizing proper personal hygiene practices; -Ensure holding temperatures of food were within the safe range; and, -Ensure systems were in place to prevent compromised food safety through proper staff training. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure food was labeled, dated and monitored correctly A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://drive.google.com/file/d/18-uo0wlxj9xvOoT6Ai4x6ZMYIiuu2v1G/view. It revealed in pertinent part, A date marking system that meets the criteria stated in (1) and (2) of this section may include: Using a method approved by the Department for refrigerated, ready-to eat potentially hazardous food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain emergency patient care equipment in safe operating condition and remove expired medical supplies from three of three emergency response crash carts. Specifically, the facility failed to perform daily quality readiness checks on the emergency response cart, to ensure the carts contained emergency equipment and expired items were removed and replaced. Findings include: I. Facility policy The facility policy for maintaining patient care equipment was requested [DATE] at and was not received by exit on [DATE]. II. Observations A. On [DATE] at 4:15 p.m. the second and third floor emergency response carts were observed with the director of nursing (DON). The DON acknowledged the following: Third floor emergency response cart: -Four pairs sterile examination gloves, expired [DATE] days prior; -Four 100 militer (ml) Medline Sterile Water Solutions, expired [DATE] days prior; and, -Three Medline Non-Conductive Suction Tubing - Sterile, expired [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure backflow prevention devices were installed on hand held showers in 12 private shower rooms, increasing the risk of contamination to the facility's main water supply. Findings include: I. Observation Observations of the resident living environment conducted on 4/12/23 at 1:03 p.m. revealed: The hand held shower head in rooms #227, #237, # 223, #219, #202, #203, #208, #340, #326, #331, #319 and #307 did not have a backflow prevention valve on them. The hand held showers were long enough to sit on the side on the floor next to the drain. There was visible standing water at the base of the shower pans. II. Staff Interview The housekeeping supervisor (HKS) was interviewed on 4/13/23 at 9:50 a.m. He acknowledged he was not familiar with the backflow valve protocol. He said the hand held showers in all showers should have had a backflow prevention valve on them. He said he would install them…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-04-13 · tag F0923 — widespread
  Have enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate outside ventilation by means of windows and/or mechanical ventilation. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure resident bathroom exhaust fans were functioning on four resident hallways. Findings include: I. Observations An observation of the resident environment was completed on 4/12/23 at 1:03 p.m. Exhaust fans were installed in the ceiling of each bathroom. Bathroom fans in all rooms located on four of four hallways were not audible and did not create air movement with the switch turned on. As a measure of checking the function of each fan, a small square of single ply toilet paper was placed against the vent. The exhaust fans were unable to hold the toilet tissue in place which indicated the fans did not function properly. Urine odors were observed during multiple observations in all halls, between 4/10/23 and 4/13/23. The bathroom exhaust fans were not functioning in all restrooms of the facility. II. Staff Interview The environmental tour was conducted with the housekeeping supervisor (HKS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-04-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for residents in 10 of 25 resident rooms in four hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure walls, halls, ceilings, and floors were repaired, painted and properly maintained. Findings include: I. Initial observations Observations of the resident living environment was conducted on 4/12/23 at 1:03 p.m. revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER]: The toilet paper holder in the resident's restroom was falling off the wall with two dime sized holes. The wall next to the entrance had two dimes sized holes. The transition from the resident's room to the hallway was missing room [ROOM NUMBER]: The resident's thermostat had been moved with the outline of the old thermostat visible. room [ROOM NUMBER]: There were two quarter sized holes on the wall next to the room's entrance. The ceiling outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] had two large water stains approximately 24 inches by 24 inches and the other was 20…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accidents and hazards. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the exit doors to the second and third floor balconies were locked from the outside without allowing building re-entry if locked outside. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Facility Assessment Tool, dated 10/19/22, was received on 4/10/23 from the director of nursing (DON). -The assessment tool did not include information on facility patio-balcony safety for exit and entry. II. Observations On 4/10/23 at 1:15 p.m., on the third floor west hallway the patio door was propped wide open with a metal patio chair. There was a letter size notice at standing eye level on the inside wall to notify patio users the door would lock from the outside if the door was fully closed. A portable, wireless, doorbell button was observed at standing height attached to the outside door frame. On 4/11/23 at 8:45 a.m. the third floor west hallway patio was propped wide open with a metal patio chair. The third floor west hallway…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen provided food that accommodated resident preferences for three (#27, #28 and #229) of six residents of 20 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #27, #28 and #229 were receiving their menu choices. Findings include: I. Resident #27 Resident #27, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included osteoarthritis and irregular heartbeat. The 4/4/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had no cognitive impairments with a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15. B. Resident interview Resident #27 was interviewed on 4/11/13 at 10:15 a.m. She said during her stay, she completed menus with her food choices but she rarely received the food that she requested. She said when she received food items she did not want, certified nursing assistants (CNA) were not helpful to replace the items.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections such as COVID-19 in one of four halls including an isolation room. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care for Resident #136 who was positive for COVID. Findings include: I. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommended guidelines The CDC, Preparing for COVID-19 in Nursing Homes, updated 9/27/22, retrieved on 4/19/22 from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/long-term-care.html. It read in pertinent part, HCP (healthcare personnel) who enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection should adhere to Standard Precautions and use a NIOSH-approved particulate respirator with N95 filters or higher , gown, gloves, and eye protection (goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face). In…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO