Center At Centerplace, Llc, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 318 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 49.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 85 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 40.7 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.41 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.55 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-12-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident had the right to formulate an advanced directive for one (#1) out of three residents reviewed out of three sample residents. s out of three sample residents.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (lungs struggle to get enough oxygen into the blood), interstitial pulmonary disease (a condition that causes inflammation and scarring in the lungs), pulmonary hypertension (high blood pressure in the arteries connecting the heart to the lungs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute exacerbation (sudden worsening of respiratory symptoms like shortness of breath and coughing), and pneumonia (a lung infection).The hospital referral information had conflicting information regarding the resident's cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) wishes. Upon admission, the resident's representative and a nurse practitioner (NP) signed the resident's Colorado Medical Orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care consistent with professional standards of practice. This affected five (#1, #2, #5, #6 and #7) of six residents out of eight total sample residents. RESIDENT #1 Resident #1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. His diagnoses included long-term use of anticoagulants (blood thinner). Orders included the anticoagulant Lovenox by injection, started 10/10/24 and discontinued 11/7/24, and Apixaban (Eliquis) an oral anticoagulant for deep vein thrombosis, started 11/7/24, discontinued 11/13/24, and ordered again on 11/13/24 to 11/28/24. A review of the treatment administration record (TAR) revealed the November orders, starting 10/16/24, read in part, Anti-coagulation medication monitoring: monitor every shift for signs and symptoms of bleeding (black tarry stools, increased or new bleeding of gums, blood in urine, etc). If complications notify MD . -However, this order was discontinued on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received food prepared by methods that conserved nutritive value and was palatable in taste, texture and temperature.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the residents' food was palatable in taste, texture and temperature. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Standardized Recipes policy, dated 2021, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/23/26 at 5:06 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Standardized recipes will be used when preparing menu items. Standardized recipes (in appropriate portion sizes) for planned menu items will be maintained in the facility. Cooks/chefs are expected to use and follow the recipes provided. Cooks/chefs should discuss problems or concerns about recipes with the director of food and nutrition services so that issues can be resolved.II. Resident representative interview Resident #13's representative was interviewed on 4/20/25 at 1:17 p.m. The resident's representative said the resident had stayed at the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on two of two units.Specifically, the facility failed to:-Ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to Resident #4; and,-Ensure staff properly cleaned shared vital signs equipment between residents. Findings include: I. EBP failures A. Professional reference According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs), (4/2/24), retrieved on 4/27/26, from https://www.cdc.gov/long-term-care-facilities/hcp/prevent-mdro/PPE.html, Multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission is common in skilled nursing facilities, contributing to substantial resident morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare costs.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve grievances for one (#1) of three residents reviewed for grievances out of 29 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to report, document and follow-up on a grievance reported by Resident #1 concerning a lost personal item. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Grievance policy and procedure, revised 2/8/21, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/23/26 at 5:06 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Grievances can be communicated to a staff member either verbally or in writing. The facility will make every effort to promptly investigate and resolve any grievances. If a complaint is verbal, it is the responsibility of the staff member who received the complaint to properly complete the grievance form on behalf of the complainant. The completed form must be provided to the NHA or designee immediately. II. Resident #1A. Resident statusResident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from risk of accidents and hazards for one (#6) of two residents reviewed for accident hazards out of 29 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #6, who had previous falls, while showering. Findings include:I. Resident #6A. Resident statusResident #6, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included pneumonia, dementia with agitation and generalized muscle weakness.The 1/17/26 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident had moderate cognitive impairments with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) assessment score of 12 out of 15.The resident was required partial to maximal assistance from staff for most activities of daily living (ADL). The resident required maximal assistance from staff for most transfer activities.B. Resident interview and observationsResident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#37) of two residents who required respiratory care received the care consistent with professional standards of practice out of 29 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to:-Ensure a physician's order was in place for a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) machine (a type of non-invasive ventilation that helps people breathe by providing pressurized air through a mask or nasal plugs) for Resident #37 to use during the day; and,-Ensure a care plan was in place to clean, sanitize and store Resident #37's BiPAP mask. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe CPAP/BiPAP policy and procedure, revised 8/4/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/23/26 at 5:06 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, The patient will receive necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, the patient's care plan, and the patient's choice.Patient will have order…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure one (#15) of two residents reviewed for dialysis care out of 29 sample residents received dialysis services consistent with professional standards of practice. Specifically, the facility failed to implement recommendations from the dialysis center for Resident #15 to be on a therapeutic diet and a fluid restriction. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dialysis Contract, revised 8/5/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/21/26 at 1:03 p.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Dialysis communication sheet will be given to the dialysis center with facility and patient information. Facility shall ensure appropriate information accompanies the resident to the dialysis center, including treatment presently being provided to the Designated Resident, including medications and any changes in a patient's condition (physical or mental), change of medication, diet or fluid intake. Any other information that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors for two (#4 and #30) of five residents reviewed for medication errors out of 31 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to follow the physician's order parameters for Resident #4 and Resident #30's blood pressure medications. Findings include:I. Resident #4 A. Resident status Resident 4, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2026 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hypertension and peripheral vascular disease.According to the 3/312/26 MDS assessment, the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. B. Record review Review of Resident #4's April 2026 CPO revealed the following physician's orders:Amlodipine Besylate oral tablet 10 milligram (mg). Give 10 mg by mouth in the morning for hypertension. Hold if systolic blood pressure is less than 110 milliliters of mercury (mmHg).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide proper storage for medical supplies and supplements for two of three medication carts and two of two medication storage rooms. Specifically, the facility failed to:-Discard expired insulin;-Discard expired testing supplies; and,-Discard expired supplements. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Storage of Medications policy, revised 2/9/26, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/23/26 at 5:06 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Medications and biologicals are stored properly, following manufacturer's or provider pharmacy recommendations, to maintain their integrity and to support safe effective drug administration. Outdated, contaminated, discontinued or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy as necessary, if a current order exists. Medication storage should be kept clean, well-lit, organized, and free of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#5) of five residents received the highest practicable treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice of five sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:-All prescribed medications which were ordered upon Resident #5's admission, including medications to treat infections, were administered as ordered and when available; and,-Notify the physician when Resident #5 medications were not administered as ordered. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe IV (intravenous) Medication Administration policy, revised 10/12/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/19/25 at 9:44 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility that IV medications are to be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. IV medication must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician.The Medication Administration policy, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective quality assurance program to identify and address facility compliance concerns was implemented, in order to facilitate improvement in the lives of nursing home residents, through continuous attention to quality of care, quality of life and resident safety. Specifically, the quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) program committee failed to identify and address concerns related to quality of care by not sending a resident to the hospital when indicated that rose to the level of immediate jeopardy and created a situation where a serious adverse outcome occurred and caused harm. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy, revised 2/11/25 (during the survey), was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 2/13/25 at 1:17 p.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to develop a QAPI plan in accordance with Federal guidelines to describe how the facility will address clinical care, residents'…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$31,360 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,901 — penalty dated 2025-12-22
• $16,459 — penalty dated 2025-02-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO