The Center At Cordera
9208 Grand Cordera Pkwy, Colorado Springs, CO 80924 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (719) 522-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,600 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-29)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.1% | 13.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.7% | 4.7% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 13.3% | 0.6% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 34.2% | 8.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.4% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.5% | 11.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.9% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 30.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.2% | 1.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.6% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.1% | 20.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.6% | 12.1% | 12.0% | typical |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
70.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 393 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 72.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 248 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.00 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 70.5%CMS range 66.2–74.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.8%CMS range 6.5–11.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 72.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 73.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.1%CMS range 2.9–8.1 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.14 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 71.3 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.01 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.05 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.11 to 0.77 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for two (#30 and #5) of six residents reviewed for falls out of 28 sample residents. Resident #30, who was severely cognitively impaired and had a history of falls, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a fall at home which resulted in a left hip fracture requiring surgical repair. Upon the resident's admission, the facility initiated a fall care plan with generalized interventions that were implemented for all residents, including an intervention to ensure the resident's call light was within reach and a Call, don't fall sign was to be posted in the resident's room. -However, the facility failed to appropriately assess Resident #30's ability to use her call light and understand what the Call, don't fall sign was for due to her severe cognitive impairments. The facility did not implement person-centered fall interventions that were specific to Resident #30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide effective pain management in accordance with professional standards for one (#1) of one resident out of 27 sample residents. Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness and adult failure to thrive. According to the 7/31/24 nursing comprehensive admission assessment for skin, Resident #1 had no skin issues. He often refused repositioning and to get out of bed due to pain. On 8/12/24 he developed pressure ulcers on his buttocks and coccyx. Additional medication was not ordered for wound care and all he was receiving for pain was Tylenol four times per day and a Lidocaine patch. On 8/27/24 Resident #1 was observed to be in severe pain during wound care of his buttocks and coccyx wounds. The facility's failure to provide effective pain management contributed to the resident suffering prolonged pain from his wounds and other areas on his body. Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-14 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one of five nursing members were able to demonstrate skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure licensed practice nurse (LPN) #1 was licensed in Colorado while working active shifts at the facility. Findings include:Record review and interviews confirmed the facility corrected the deficient practice prior to the onsite investigation from [DATE], resulting in the deficiency being cited as past noncompliance with a correction date of [DATE]. I. Facility correctionA. Immediate actionThe human resources manager, while completing license verification checks on [DATE], identified LPN #1's expired multi-license nursing license. Upon notification of LPN #1 no longer having a multistate license, LPN #1 was notified and placed on suspension. LPN #1's employment status was terminated. The executive director and human resources manager spoke with LPN #1 and she said she would notify both her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided in accordance with professional standards for four residents (#8, #2, #9 and #5) of eight out of 12 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure oxygen was administered according to physician's orders for Resident #8, #2, #9 and #5. Findings include: I. Professional Reference According to Nursing Skills, Open Resources for Nursing (Open RN); Ernstmeyer K, [NAME] E, editors. Eau [NAME] (WI): [NAME] Valley Technical College; published 2021, accessed on 2/18/26 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK593208/ Oxygen is considered a medication and, therefore, requires a prescription and continuous monitoring by the nurse to ensure its safe and effective use. (Chapter 11) For patients with chronic respiratory conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the target range for SpO2 is often lower at 88% to 92%. (Chapter 11) Oxygen is a medication and should not be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure self-administration of medications was clinically appropriate for three (#3, #8 and #13) of three residents out of 21 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Resident #3, Resident #8 and Resident #13 were assessed for the appropriateness and safety of self-administration of medications;-Ensure there was a physician order for self-administration of medications; and,-Ensure there was a physician order for medications at the bedside for Resident #8 and Resident #13.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Self-administration of Medications policy, dated [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 2:09 p.m. It read in pertinent part, “The nursing staff will assess each resident’s mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is clinically appropriate for the resident. If the team determines that a resident cannot safely…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of room changes for two (#14 and #19) of five residents reviewed for notifications out of 21 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14 and Resident #19 received written notice of a room change. Findings include: I. Resident #14A. Resident status Resident #14, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, type 2 diabetes with diabetic kidney complication, end stage renal disease, dissection of the ascending aorta (tear in the lining of the aorta), encephalopathy (altered brain function or structure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and muscle weakness.B. Record reviewThe progress note, dated 6/5/25, revealed a message was left for the resident's son, requesting a callback. The resident's friend was contacted to discuss a room change. The resident's friend mentioned that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure services provided to residents met professional standards of quality for two (#10 and #8 ) of one resident out of 21 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for pain medications included parameters for when to administer specific pain medications for Resident #10 and Resident #8.Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Analgesia policy and procedure, dated 2/1/18, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/25 at 12:24 p.m. The policy read in pertinent part, “Nurses must follow pain parameters and enter pain scales for pain medicines. If a resident wants one pain pill and they rate their pain 7-10 and the order reads to give two for pain of 6-10, it must be charted that it was per resident request. Nurse management must be notified so it can be care planned.” II. Resident #10 A. Resident status Resident #10, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision during the use of assistive devices to keep residents free from safety hazards for three (#20, #21, and #5) of the six residents out of 21 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #20, Resident #21, and Resident #5's foot pedals were in place on their wheelchairs when staff were transporting the residents.Findings include: I. Resident #20 A. Resident status Resident #20, age greater than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the July 2025 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included displaced intertrochanteric fracture of the right femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, history of falls, difficulty walking, muscle weakness, and a need for assistance with personal care. The 7/10/25 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents with a feeding tube received appropriate treatment and services for two (#8 and #3) of the four residents reviewed with a feeding tube out of 23 sample residents.Specifically, the facility failed to ensure:-Resident #8's physician's orders were complete and accurate, with the correct route, and orders were followed; and,-Resident #3 received adequate hydration per the registered dietitian's (RD) recommendations. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Administering Medications Through an Enteral Tube policy, revised on 3/19/24, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 7/23/25 at 9:44 a.m. It read in pertinent part, “If at any time the patient cannot tolerate the feeding, place the feeding on hold and notify the provider. “Tablets that must be crushed before administration through an enteral tube require a specific order related to crushing. “When the last of the medication begins to drain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to establish a sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections on one of five hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the housekeeping staff completed proper hand hygiene when cleaning resident rooms and followed the appropriate guidelines for disinfectant solution; and, -Ensure the nursing staff followed enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) appropriately during resident care. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure housekeeping completed proper hand hygiene and followed appropriate disinfectant guidelines when cleaning resident rooms A. Professional reference The Center for Disease Control (CDC) (February 2024) Clinical Safety: Hand Hygiene for Healthcare Workers, was retrieved on 9/4/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/clean-hands/hcp/clinical-safety/index.html. It read in pertinent part, Recommendations to clean your hands include immediately before touching a patient, before performing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in one kitchen. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Appropriate hand hygiene by food service staff; -Foods of modified consistency were reheated to safe temperatures following the use of a multi-step preparation process; and, Cutting boards were free from deep scratches and stains. Findings include: I. Improper hand hygiene A. Professional references According to the Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations (effective 1/1/19) pg. 46-47, Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms immediately before engaging in food preparation including working with exposed food, clean equipment and utensils, and unwrapped single-service items and: Before handling or putting on single use gloves for working with food, and between removing soiled gloves and putting on clean gloves. Food employees shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms including surrogate prosthetic devices…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-04-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure backflow prevention devices were installed on hoses in two maintenance closets, increasing the risk of contamination to the facility's main water supply. Findings include: I. Observation Observations of the resident living environment conducted on 4/24/23 at 3:30 p.m. revealed: The hoses on the second and third floor maintenance closets did not have a backflow prevention valve on them. The hose on the third floor was long enough to sit on the bottom of the drain pan. The hose on the second floor was approximately 25 feet long and coiled and was sitting at the bottom of the sink pan. There was visible standing water at the base of both of the sink pans. II. Staff Interview The housekeeping supervisor (HKS) was interviewed on 4/25/23 at 9:40 a.m. He said the hoses in the maintenance closet should have had a backflow prevention valve on them. He said he would install them immediately.
Show the remaining 23 citations
- Potential for harm · E2023-04-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for residents in 17 of 44 resident rooms in four hallways. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure walls, and ventilation fans were cleaned and properly maintained. Findings include: I. Initial observations Observations of the resident living environment was conducted on 4/24/23 at 3:30 p.m. revealed: room [ROOM NUMBER]: The exhaust fan in the resident's restroom had a large accumulation of dust which was affecting the functionality of the fan. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The wall next to the resident's restroom had peeling and chipped sheetrock approximately four feet high by two inches wide. The exhaust fan in the resident's restroom had a large accumulation of dust which was affecting the functionality of the fan. room [ROOM NUMBER]: The wall next to the resident's restroom had chipped and peeling sheetrock approximately four two feet high by two inches wide. The exhaust fan in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent pressure injuries from occurring for one (#9) of two residents reviewed out of 28 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #9's bilateral heels were offloaded while in bed. Findings include: I. Professional reference The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPUAP), Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers accessed on 4/27/23 from https://npiap.com/ read, steps to prevent the emergence of pressure ulcers in individuals identified as being at high risk include scheduled repositioning to avoid individuals being in a position that places pressure on a vulnerable area for a long period of time. II. Facility policy and procedure The Pressure Ulcer policy, revised 2/8/21, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/25/23 at 12:25 p.m. It read in pertinent part: The (name) will provide the necessary requirements to ensure that a patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks for falls for two (#198 and #197) residents out of five residents reviewed for falls out of 28 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #197 and #198 were provided the interventions available to prevent repeated falls and staff were aware of person-centered interventions. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Prevention Program policy, revised August 2022, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/24/23 at 4:06 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Any patient deemed to be high risk will have the following interventions implemented or at least considered: -Low bed (or lower our standard bed to its lowest position) -Bedside floor pads on both sides of bed. For post falls: -Determine what interventions need to be implemented to prevent further falls. Intervention will be reviewed by Interdisciplinary Team for appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-25 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews the facility failed to maintain communication with the hospice provider, including how the communication would be documented between the facility and the provider for two (#198 and #104) of two residents reviewed for hospice care services out of five residents reviewed for hospicare care out of 28 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Demonstrate documentation of a collaboration of care between the facility and the hospice provider for Resident #198; and, -Ensure medication orders from the hospice provider were received and administered for Resident #104. Findings include: I. Resident #198 A. Resident status Resident #198, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the April 2023 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and major depressive disorder. The 4/17/23 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed a brief interview of mental status (BIMS) was not conducted with the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection, including COVID-19. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff and visitors wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and performed appropriate hand hygiene when entering transmission-based precaution (TBP) rooms; -Ensure residents were offered hand hygiene before meals; -Ensure staff performed handwashing; -Ensure equipment was disinfected between residents; and, -Ensure housekeeping used chemicals correctly. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedures A. The Infection Prevention, Control, and Immunizations policy, last revised 2/8/21, was provided by the nursing home administrator via email on 1/17/22 at 3:37 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Staff will use standard precautions (hand hygiene and appropriate PPE equipment). Staff will follow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that professional standards of practice were followed for three (#13, #40 and #204) of three out of 29 sample residents. Specifically the facility failed to: -Notify the provider of missed medications, late medications or unavailable medications for Resident #40 and #204 (cross-reference F755 pharmacy services); and, -Obtain a crush medication order from the physician prior to administering medications to Resident #13; Findings include: I. Facility policy The Medication Administration policy, revised on 2/8/21, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/19/21 read in pertinent part; It is the policy of this facility that medications are to be administered as prescribed by the attending physician. Procedures: -Medications must be administered in accordance with the written orders of the attending physician. -All current drugs and dosage schedules must be recorded on the patient's medication administration record (MAR as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for four (#10, #298, #13, and #40) of six residents reviewed out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure Residents #10, #298, and #40 received their scheduled showers; -Ensure Residents #40 and #13 received timely meal assistance; and, -Ensure Residents #40 received catheter care according to the care plan to assist with the prevention of infections (cross-reference F880, infection control). Findings include: I. Resident #10 A. Resident status Resident #10, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included multiple fractures, and abnormality of gait and mobility. The 12/15/21 minimum data set (MDS) revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognitive status with a brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities designed to meet the interests of the resident and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for three (#13, #16, and #10) of four out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to offer and provide activities to Residents #13, #16, and #10. Findings include: 1. Resident #13 A. Resident status Resident #13, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2021 clinical physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, abnormalities of gait and mobility, generalized muscle weakness, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, aphasia, disorientation, diabetes mellitus. The December 2021 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment with a brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-20 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a qualified professional. Specifically, the facility failed to employ a qualified activities director in order to provide a program of activities for residents requiring activity and recreational support. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to the National Certification Council of Activity Professionals (NCCAP) at www.nccap.org accessed 2/1/22, an activity director must meet specific qualifications in education, certification and/or experience. The qualifications read in part: The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who is: Licensed or registered, if applicable, by the State in which practicing; .Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body .Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years, one of which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice for three (#13, #16 and #296) out of three sample residents out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Clarify titration orders for Residents #13, #16, and #296; and, -Ensure the oxygen tubing was dated when when changed for Residents #13, #16 and #296. Findings include: I. Facility policy On 1/19/22, the nursing home administrator (NHA) provided a copy of the oxygen policy dated 12/20/18. The policy read in pertinent parts, a patient receiving oxygen therapy, the patient's record must reflect ongoing evaluation of the patient's respiratory status, response to oxygen therapy and include, at a minimum, the attending practitioner's orders and indication for use. In addition, the record should include the type of oxygen delivery system; when to administer and/or when to discontinue; equipment settings for the prescribed flow rates;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure registered nurses (RNs) were able to demonstrate competencies in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had completed competencies prior to providing skilled services as ordered by the physician for three out of three nurses reviewed for competencies. Findings include: I. Facility acuity On 1/17/22 the facility had seven residents with a catheter, three residents who were receiving intravenous therapies, one resident with an ostomy, and three residents receiving nutrition and medications through tube feedings to include a nasogastric tube and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. II. Competency records The facility did not have any competency records for registered nurses (RN) #3, #4, and #5. III. Interviews Registered nurse (RN) #7 was interviewed on 1/19/22 at 1:45 p.m. She said she had not had competencies completed. The nursing home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY III. Resident #32 A. Resident status Resident #32, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2021 CPO, diagnoses included stable burst fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, Covid-19, generalized muscle weakness, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and anxiety disorder. The December 2021 minimum data set (MDS) assessment documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) was not conducted. The MDS coded the resident required limited assistance of one person with transfers, mobility, and supervision of one person for personal hygiene and eating. B. Record review The January 2022 CPO showed a physician's order for Lidocaine patch 4% to be applied to the resident's left hip topically every morning for postoperative pain. The order start date was 12/28/21. The December 2021 and the January 2022 MAR were reviewed and found the Lidocaine patch was not available and was not administered. The medication administration record (MAR) read as follows: On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-01-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs were evaluated by a physician within 14 days for use and duration for four (#13, #37, #40 and #152) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Re-evaluate the use of a PRN psychotropic medication by a physician within 14 days for Residents #13, #37 and #40; -Have a duration for the PRN psychotropic medication for Resident #13, #37 and #40; -Follow several pharmacy recommendations to discontinue a PRN psychotropic medication; and, -Track hours of sleep for the use of a hypnotic for Resident #152. Finding include: I. Facility policy and procedures The Medication Administration policy, revised on 2/8/21, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/19/21 read in pertinent part: It is the policy of the facility that medications are to be administered as prescribed by the attending physician.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-20 · tag F0849 — patternArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the hospice services provided met professional standards and principles that applied to individuals providing services in the facility for one (#37) of one resident reviewed for hospice services out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to have a member of the interdisciplinary team (IDT) team who collaborated with hospice to provide coordinated care for a resident; -Failed to orientate hospice aides to the facility including the policies and procedures; and, -Failed to develop a care plan that included frequency of visits for a resident receiving hospice services. I. Facility policy The Hospice Program policy, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/19/22 at 11:10 a.m. included; The facility and hospice, with input from the patient and family, will establish a coordinated plan of care, which reflects and supports the hospice philosophy. -The plan of care will include directives for managing pain and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain dignity during personal care in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#13) out of one out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure privacy during personal care for Resident #13. Findings include: I. Facility policy On 1/19/22 the nursing home administrator (NHA) provided an undated copy of the facilities notice of privacy practices that states the facility is committed to keep health information as confidential as required by law and it will not be shared with others without written permission except as needed for treatment, payment, and health care operations. II. Personal privacy 1. Resident #13. A. Resident status Resident #13, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. According to the December 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, abnormalities of gait and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, to ensure the discharge needs were identified, resulted in the development of a discharge plan, and involved the interdisciplinary team in the ongoing process, for one (#302) of three residents reviewed out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure there was discharge planning for Resident #302 to include: -Regarding further communication with the resident about her goals, treatment needs, preferences for discharge and/or the change from her previously stated goal to discharge home; and, -Development of a comprehensive discharge plan by the interdisciplinary team (IDT). Findings include: I. Resident status Resident #302, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 11/24/21. According to the November 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included hypertension, obstructive uropathy and hyperlipidemia. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) for one (#13) out of two residents reviewed for communication needs out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop an effective person-centered individualized communication plan and failed to train the staff on family identified communication tools for Resident #13. Findings include: I. Facility policy On 1/19/22, the nursing home administrator (NHA) provided a copy of the ADL services policy dated 12/3/20. The policy read that the resident shall receive assistance with ADLs every shift as appropriate. If the resident requires assistance with meal services, a staff member will be assigned to the resident to provide the services needed. If the resident is not able to verbally tell staff what their needs are, the staff will anticipate their needs and also ask power of attorney (POA)/Family what resident's daily routine was at home and attempt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#10) of one reviewed out of 29 sample residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure physician's orders were followed in regards to the administration of Acetaminophen; and, -Ensure the resident's blood pressure was monitored when outside of his baseline. Findings include: I. Acetaminophen administered in excess of 3 milligrams (mg) A. Resident status Resident #10, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the January 2022 computerized physician orders (CPO) diagnoses included multiple fractures, and abnormality of gait and mobility and epilepsy. The 12/15/21 minimum data set (MDS) revealed the resident had moderately impaired cognitive status with a brief interview for mental status score of 11 out of 15. The resident was coded as requiring limited assistance for activities of daily living and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for two (#298 and #299) of four residents reviewed for falls out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Resident #298 was assessed properly for falls, and interventions were put into place to prevent falls; and -Effective interventions to prevent falls for Resident #299 were assessed, provided and followed. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Prevention Policy revised on 2/9/21 was received on 1/19/22 at 10:11 a.m., by the nursing home administrator read in pertinent parts, Any patient deemed to be high risk by nursing and/or therapy staff will have the following interventions implemented immediately or at least considered: though physical and occupational therapy evaluation, low bed, bedside floor pads on both sides of bed, routine toileting throughout shift, increase time spent in common area in ine of sight of nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who enter the facility without an indwelling catheter was not catheterized unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that catheterization was necessary, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#147) of three residents reviewed for catheters out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility: -Failed to obtain an order for a catheter for Resident #147; -Failed to notify the medical power of attorney (MPOA) of the catheter placement for Resident #147; -Failed to care plan the use of a catheter for Resident#147; and, -Failed to have ongoing monitoring of a catheter for Resident #147. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Foley Catheter policy, revised 2/8/21, provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/19/22 at 5:01 p.m. included, When possible, all Foley catheters should be removed prior to admission unless an appropriate diagnosis exists. If a patient requires an indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to manage pain in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#201) of three residents reviewed out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to administer pain medications in a timely manner for Resident #201. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The analgesia policy and procedure revised on 2/1/2018 provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 1/19/22 read in pertinent part: Pain is a medical problem that we face on a daily basis in the facility. Frequently residents arrive from the hospital with acute pain secondary to being transformed and transported. The facility protocol should help with alleviating any delays in our attempts to control the pain. Upon admission, all residents will be evaluated for pain. Pain level will also be evaluated every shift. Once a resident expresses the perception of pain or makes a request for pain medication, resident will be provided with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide dementia care in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice for one (#32) out of one resident out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to effectively identify person-centered approaches for dementia care for Resident #32. Finding include: I. Facility policy The Dementia Care policy, dated 2/10/2020, states the purpose of dementia care in this facility is to provide a quality of life with respect, dignity, and caring in a friendly, clean, and non-abusive atmosphere. This facility is committed to serving the needs of all elders including elders with dementia-related behaviors. The policy goes on to state that dementia is a disease process referring to progressive decline in cognitive function, intellectual functions including thinking, memory, and reasoning affecting everyday life. The facility promotes person-centered care considering the elder's needs, not just medical or physical needs. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-01-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of records for one resident (#47) out of 29 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to document the events that occurred surrounding the death of Resident #47. Findings include: I. Facility policy The Facility Records policy, revised on [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) read in pertinent part: A completed health record shall be maintained on every patient from the time of admission through the time of discharge. All health records shall contain the following procedures. Nursing records dated and signed by nursing personnel, which include the patient evaluation of special procedures performed, notes of observations, and the time and circumstances of death if applicable. II. Record review Review of Resident #47's medical orders of scope of treatment (MOST) form revealed he wanted full treatment to include cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). He signed the form on [DATE]. The nurse note dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,600 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,600 — penalty dated 2024-08-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 4.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 3.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 3.1 | -0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
The other 12 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| MURDOCK, MONTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2021 |
| SENKOFF, ALEXANDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Colorado Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 065413. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.