Center At Lincoln, Llc, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 518 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 176 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 98% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 80.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.07 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.05 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.13 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-11-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one (#1) of five residents reviewed for accidents out of five sample residents.Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] for postoperative left knee replacement rehabilitation services and physical therapy. Resident #1 was determined to be a high fall risk related to her postoperative status and history of falls. On 10/17/25 Resident #1 sustained an unwitnessed fall when she was left unattended in the bathroom.On 10/24/25 Resident #1 sustained an additional fall when she was left unattended in the shower. She sustained a left femur fracture that was deemed inoperable for repair. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were consistently implemented for Resident #1, which resulted in a fall with major injury. Findings include:I. Facility policy and procedureThe Fall Prevention policy, revised 7/24/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to consistently serve food that was palatable and attractive. Specifically, the facility failed to consistently ensure foods were appealing and palatable in temperature and seasoning. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Food Palatability policy and procedure, revised 8/22/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/22/24 at 8:38 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Food and drink each resident receives and the facility provides foods prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance. In addition, the food is palatable, attractive, and served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The dietary staff prepares foods according to the menu and recipes available in the dietary department. Foods are sampled daily by designated staff to ensure the taste and quality of the foods remain at a high level. Use of seasonings and proper cooking methods are followed to ensure the food is appealing and palatable. II. Resident interviews Resident #221 was interviewed on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared, distributed and served under sanitary conditions in the main kitchen and two of two nourishment refrigerators. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure ready-to-eat foods were handled in a sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination in the main kitchen; and, -Ensure safe and appropriate storage of food items in the kitchen and nourishment room refrigerators. Findings include: I. Failed to ensure ready-to-eat foods were handled in a sanitary manner A. Professional reference The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Regulations, (3/16/24), were retrieved on 11/25/24 from https://cdphe.colorado.gov/environment/food-regulations. It revealed in pertinent part, Food employees may not contact exposed, ready-to-eat food with their bare hands and shall use suitable utensils such as deli tissue, spatulas, tongs, single-use gloves, or dispensing equipment. If used, single-use gloves shall be used for only one task such as working with ready-to-eat food or with raw animal food, used for no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0655 — pattern
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop an acute/baseline care plan for four (#380, #376, #382 and #225) of four residents reviewed for baseline care plans out of 60 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #380, #376, #382 and #225 were provided a copy of their baseline care plan with 48 hours of admission to the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Baseline Care Plan policy and procedure, revised March 2020, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/22/24 at 8:33 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to promote seamless interdisciplinary care for our residents by utilizing the interdisciplinary plan of care based on assessment, planning, treatment, service and intervention. It is utilized to plan and manage resident care as evidenced by documentation from admission through discharge for each resident. The care plan will identify priority problems and needs to be addressed by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0660 — pattern
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge plan for nine (#376, #378, #380, #371, #388, #382, #10, #185 and #225) of 10 residents reviewed for discharge planning out of 60 sample residents. Specifically, for Residents #376, #378, #380, #371, #388, #382, #10, #185 and #225, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents and their representatives were involved in the development of the discharge plan; -Ensure the discharge plan of care was updated with the residents' discharge goals; and, -Ensure the discharge planning process was documented in the residents' electronic medical records (EMR). Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Admissions, Readmission, Transfers, and Discharge Process policy and procedure, revised February 2023, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/22/24 at 8:33 a.m. It read in pertinent part, It is the policy of this facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of diseases and infection on one of three units. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in COVID-19 positive resident rooms; -Ensure proper infection control practices were followed for wound care; -Identify an effective process to ensure staff were aware of which residents required enhanced barrier precautions (EBP); and, -Ensure staff wore the appropriate PPE for residents on EBP. Findings include: I. Failure to ensure staff wore the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) in COVID-19 positive resident rooms A. Professional reference According to the Center for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) Infection control Guidance: SARS-CoV-2, (9/23/22) retrieved on 11/26/24 from https://www.cdc.gov/covid/hcp/infection-control/, Healthcare personnel (HCP) who enter the room of a patient with suspected…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for one (#226) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 60 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure informed consent, which included the risks associated with taking a psychotropic medication, were obtained for Resident #226 prior to the administration of a psychotropic medication. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Psychotropic Medication Use policy and procedure, revised 2/8/21, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/22/24 at 8:38 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Psychotropic consent will be obtained from the resident and or family on admission or within 72 hours of admission. II. Resident #226 A. Resident status Resident #226, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to honor resident choices for one (#53) of one resident out of 60 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #53's preference to have her bed bath completed during the day shift was honored. Findings include: I. Resident #53 A. Resident status Resident #53, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE]. According to the November 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included fracture of left femur, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes and morbid obesity. The 10/10/24 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed the resident was cognitively intact with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. She was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, and lower body dressing and was partially dependent on staff for all other activities of daily living (ADL). The assessment indicated that it was very important that she was able to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath or sponge bath. B.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property for three (#228, #46 and #229) of three residents reviewed for personal property out of 60 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to prevent the loss of property for Resident #228, Resident #46 and Resident #229 during their time in the facility. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Dignity policy and procedure, revised 8/15/22, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/22/24 at 8:38 a.m. It revealed in pertinent part, Residents' private space and property shall be respected at all times. Staff will not handle or move a resident's personal belongings (including radios and televisions) without the resident's permission. II. Resident #228 A. Resident status Resident #228, age less than 65, was admitted on [DATE] and discharged home on 7/29/24. According to the November 2024 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included muscle weakness and hypotension (low…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure activities were designed to support residents physical, mental and psychosocial well-being were provided for two (#373 and #36) of two residents out of 60 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to identify and meet the socialization needs for Resident #373 and #36. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Activities policy and procedure, revised February 2024, was received by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 11/22/24 at 8:33 a.m. It read in pertinent part, The resident has the right to choose activities and participate in activities, including social, religious, and community activities that do not interfere with the rights of other residents in the facility. The facility will ensure and implement an ongoing resident-centered activity program that incorporates the resident's hobbies and culture preferences, which is integral to maintaining and or improving a resident's physical, mental and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (#53) one resident out of 60 sample residents. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation services on 10/4/24 with a diagnosis of fracture of the left femur, end stage renal disease, type two diabetes and morbid obesity. The 10/5/24 admission skin assessment indicated the resident had a surgical incision on her left hip, multiple scattered bruises to both upper extremities and a chest port for dialysis. The assessment did not indicate that the resident had any abdominal wounds. On 10/24/24 the resident was noted to have two facility acquired moisture associated skin disorder (MASD) wounds to her abdominal folds. The facility failed to provide the resident with showers per her preferences. Due to the facility's failures, observations revealed the resident had developed three MASD wounds to her abdomen. Through observations, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO