Center At Eden Hill, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 771 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 475 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 97% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 48% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 89% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.35 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.41 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.00 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.69 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R108) out of twenty-eight sampled residents the facility failed to create an individualized care plan to address R108's use of a specialized TLSO brace. Findings include:7/18/25 - R108 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including a broken bone in her back [lumbar]. 7/21/25 - Care plans were initiated for R108. Review of the care plans lacked evidence of a care plan created for R108's TLSO brace. 7/22/25 - An admission MDS assessment documented that R108 had fractures as active diagnoses and required partial moderate assistance with upper body dressing. 8/20/25 8:52 PM - A neurologist consultant appointment note in R108's clinical record documented, continue to wear brace, must be supporting of her lumbar spine. 8/25/25 - A physician's progress note in R108's clinical record documented, Patient had L1 compression fracture. Patient was evaluated at bedside, stating that she is feeling weak. She has a (TLSO) brace, seems to be very wide as it is going to her chest. Also, she is not strong enough to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one (R108) out of four residents reviewed for hospitalization the facility failed to ensure that the residents discharge medication orders were correctly transcribed. The incorrect transcription resulted in the administration of a decreased dosage of R108's antidepressant medication. Findings include: Review of R108's clinical record revealed:7/14/25 - 7/18/25 - R108 was hospitalized . Discharge instructions dated 7/18/25 directed that R108 continue prescribed medications, including fluoxetine 20 mg daily for depression. 7/18/25 - R108 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including depression. 7/19/25 - A physician's order was written for R108 to receive fluoxetine 10 mg daily for depression. The clinical record was unclear why the antidepressant medication dosage was reduced from the order on the discharge documentation. 7/22/25 - An admission MDS assessment documented that R108 had a diagnosis of depression and received antidepressant medication. 7/24/25 - An initial psychology visit note documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that for two (R77 and R2) out of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications the facility failed to ensure prompt pharmacy services were provided to newly admitted residents resulting in missed doses of medications. Findings include:3/28/24 - The facility policy for admissions documented that persons will be accepted for admission on ly if the services and or care provided can reasonably be provided. 1. Review of R77s' clinical record revealed: 4/4/26 8:00 PM - R77 was admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses including anxiety. 4/4/26 - A physician's order was written for R77 to receive clonazepam twice daily for anxiety. 4/4/26 11:24 PM - A progress note in R77's clinical record documented that the resident was not given their ordered clonazepam because staff was waiting for pharmacy to clear order. 4/5/26 8:07 AM - A progress note in R77's clinical record documented that the resident was not given their ordered clonazepam because pharmacy was awaiting signature. 4/5/26 10:48 PM - A progress note in R77's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-05-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, it was determined that for three (R16, R38, and R234) out of twenty-four (24) residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity. Findings include: 1. Review of R16's clinical record revealed: 4/24/25 - R16 was admitted to the facility. 5/12/25 10:42 AM - During an observation, E14 (PTA) knocked on R16's room door and entered the room without waiting for R16's response/permission to enter the room. 5/12/25 10:43 AM - During an interview, E14 (PTA) confirmed that the expectation is to knock and wait for a response to enter a resident's room. E14 confirmed that she did not wait for a response before entering R16's room. 5/12/25 11:00 AM - During an observation, E15 (RN) knocked on R16's room door and entered the room without waiting for R16's response/permission to enter the room. 5/12/25 11:25 AM - During an interview, E15 (RN) confirmed that the expectation is to knock and wait for a response to enter a resident's room. E15 confirmed that she did not wait for a response before…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review it was determined that one (R336) out of four residents reviewed for Advanced Directives, the facility failed to ensure that a responsible party of a cognitively impaired resident was involved in code status decisions. Findings include: Review of R336's clinical record revealed: 3/1/25 - R336 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to prostate cancer with secondary bone cancer and unsteady gait. 3/3/25 6:20 PM - FM1 signed the Delaware Medical Orders for Scope of Treatment (DMOST) form indicating FM1 as R336's responsible party (RP). 3/5/25 - E12 (MD) signed DMOST form. 5/8/25 - R336 was re-admitted to facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke). 5/8/25 - R336 signed DMOST form. 5/9/25 - E5 (NP) signed DMOST form. 5/9/25 - A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment documented R336's BIMS score as 5, indicating severe cognitive impairment. 5/20/25 9:55 AM - During an interview, E5 (NP) stated that the facility utilizes the BIMS score when assessing a resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for three (R38, R76, and R234) out of four residents reviewed for Advance Directives, the facility failed to offer an opportunity to formulate an advance directive. Findings include: 1. Review of R38's clinical record revealed: 4/30/25 - R38 was admitted to the facility. 5/1/25 - A BIM's assessment was completed for R38 with a score of 15 indicating R38 was cognitively intact. 5/1/25 11:05 AM - A social history assessment was completed for R38 and documented that R38 was a full code and had a general POA. The assessment did not determine if R38 had an advanced directive or wanted to formulate one. 5/14/25 10:38 AM - During an interview, E18 (Clinical Liaison) confirmed that the admitting nurse is responsible to review admission documents with the residents upon admission. 5/14/25 10:42 AM - During an interview, E13 (LPN) confirmed that the admitting nurse is responsible to complete the resident assessments. 5/14/25 12:17 PM - During an interview, E1 (NHA) and E2 (DON) stated that the physician will discuss advanced care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for one (R24) out of two residents reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report the allegations of abuse to the State Agency within two hours. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Prohibition last revised October 12, 2022, documented: 1. State Reporting Obligations: The facility will report all allegations and substantiated occurrences of abuse, neglect . to the administrator, State Survey Agency . in accordance with Federal and State law through established procedures. a. If the events that caused the allegation involve abuse .a report is made not later than 2 hours after the management staff becomes aware of the allegation 1. Review of R24's clinical record revealed: 4/15/25 - R24 was admitted to the facility. 4/16/25 - A BIMS assessment documented that R24 was cognitively intact with a score of 15. 5/10/25 - R24 stated that nursing staff touched her inappropriately while taking vital signs. 5/12/25 3:01 PM - E1 (ED) reported the allegation of abuse incident to the State Agency. 5/19/25 9:22…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that for one (R76) out of twenty-four residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered care plan for an identified care area. Findings include: Review of R76's clinical record revealed: 4/23/25 - R76 was admitted to the facility. 4/23/25 - A physician's order was written for enoxaparin sodium (anti-coagulant) inject 40 mg subcutaneously one time a day for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) prophylaxis. Additionally, a physician's order was written to monitor side effects of anticoagulant medication for signs and symptoms of bleeding and report any complications to the physician. 4/24/25 - A care plan was initiated for R76 and lacked evidence of a care plan related to anti-coagulant use. 5/16/25 1:24 PM - During an interview, E19 (MDS Coordinator) stated the process was the admission nurse will initiate the baseline care plan and after the MDS was completed the MDS coordinator will add any additional care plans identified during completion of the MDS. E19 confirmed that a care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview it was determined that for one residents (R68) out of twenty-four residents reviewed the facility failed to have input from all required interdisciplinary team (IDT) members at the residents' care plan meetings. Findings include: Review of R68's clinical record revealed: 4/8/25 - R68 admitted to facility. 4/14/25 - An admission MDS was completed for R68. 5/12/25 - Review of R68's clinical record lacked evidence that a care plan meeting occurred with the case manager and R68. 5/12/25 2:05 PM - During an interview, R68 stated that each week the facility's case manager meets with her and her husband to discuss the care she is receiving and the plans for discharge, which are reviewed during the facility's weekly Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings. R68 explained that she is not present during the IDT meetings, but the case manager provides a summary of the discussions held by the staff present regarding her care. 5/16/25 9:38 AM - During an interview, E1 (ED) stated that Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meetings occur weekly and include all staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that for two (R15 and R76) out of twenty-four residents in the investigative sample, the facility failed to provide services that meet professional standards of quality by having Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) complete admission assessments. Findings include: Delaware State Board of Nursing - RN, LPN and NA/UAP Duties 2024 . admission Assessments * - RN .* = Once a care plan is established, the LPN may do assessments . 1. Review of R15's clinical record revealed: 3/28/25 - R15 was admitted to the facility. 3/28/25 3:54 PM - A Nursing Comprehensive admission Data Collection assessment was completed by E23 (LPN). The nursing Comprehensive admission Assessment reviewed R15's demographics, drug regimen review, self care and mobility activities, skin, sensory perception, oral/nutritional, neurological, respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, dehydration risk screener, bladder/bowel, sleep, pain, and fall risk. 3/29/25 3:14 PM - A Functional Abilities and Goals Admission assessment was completed by E8 (RN). The Functional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in DE