Center At Northridge, Llc, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 698 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 332 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 45% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 88.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.99 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.93 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-04-02 · tag F0660 — isolated
  Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process focussing on the resident's discharge goals for three (#76, #47 and #64) of five residents reviewed for discharge planning out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to for Resident #76, Resident #47 and Resident #64: -Involve the resident and the resident's representative in the discharge plan; and, -Develop discharge care plan with appropriate goals and approaches. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Admission, Discharge and Transfer policy, revised 2/9/23, was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/2/24 at 12:31 p.m. It read in pertinent part: Regardless of payment method, all residents have access to: Care that is timely and meets the needs of the resident; access to their physician; Staff, including administrative staff; and Care-planning and discharge-planning processes. Staff involved in the move in, transfer and move out process…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the safety and supervision to prevent accidents for one (#66) of three residents reviewed for falls of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Resident #66 was safe while ambulating with therapy. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Fall Prevention policy, revised October 2017, was received from the nursing home administrator (NHA) on 4/2/24 at 12:31 p.m. The policy documented in pertinent part, The post fall procedure includes nursing to assess the patient and determine the most appropriate course of action. Notification of the following must take place: physician, responsible party, and director of nursing (DON). Risk management was to be completed. Determine what interventions needed to be implemented to prevent further falls, and complete orders and/or tasks for fall prevention and for further skin injuries if indicated. II. Resident #66 status Resident #66, age under 65, was admitted on [DATE].…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed to meet the resident's nutritional needs. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure residents were served the correct diets; and, -Follow correct portion sizes to ensure adequate nutrition was provided to the residents. Findings include: I. Professional reference According to The Nutrition Care Manual website, Diet Liberalization, https://www.nutritioncaremanual.org/topic.cfm?ncm_category_id=33&lv1=273627&ncm_toc_id=273627&ncm_heading=Diet%20Manual(Retrieved 1/17/23), Therapeutic diets controlling carbohydrates or restricting specific nutrients such as protein, sodium, or potassium may be indicated for patients with impaired metabolic capacity for specific nutrients or to prevent the progression of certain diseases. II. Failure to ensure residents were served the correct diets A. Observation and record review During a continuous observation during the lunch meal on 1/9/22 beginning at 11:14 a.m. and ending at 12:37 p.m, cook #1 used the following scoop sizes: A four ounce…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-09-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen. Specifically the facility failed to: -Ensure food was served at proper temperatures; -Store equipment in a sanitary manner; -Sanitize equipment properly and hygienically; and, -Have a thermometer internally for the walk in refrigerator and walk in freezer. Findings include: I. Food temperatures A. Professional reference The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (2019) The Colorado Retail Food Establishment Rules and Regulations, https://drive.google.com/file/d/18-uo0wlxj9xvOoT6Ai4x6ZMYIiuu2v1G/view . It read in pertinent part; The food shall have an initial temperature of 41 degree Fahrenheit (ºF) or less when removed from cold holding temperature control or 135°F or greater when removed from hot holding temperature control. Accessed on 10/7/21. B. Observations Lunch tray line was observed on 9/29/21 at 11:16 a.m. The meal served consisted of spaghetti, roasted vegetables, and cornbread. Hamburgers were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2021-09-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have an effective infection control program. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure staff offered hand sanitation prior to resident meals; -Perform appropriate screening, restrictions and education of visitors; and, -Ensure housekeeping staff completed proper handwashing, and disinfected appropriately during cleaning of resident rooms. Findings include: I. Staff not offering hand sanitation prior to serving residents their meals A. Professional reference The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Hand Hygiene updated 5/17/2020, retrieved on 10/8/21 from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/hand-hygiene.html, revealed in part, Hand hygiene is an important part of the U.S. response to the international emergence of COVID-19. Practicing hand hygiene, which includes the use of alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) or handwashing, is a simple yet effective way to prevent the spread of pathogens and infections in healthcare settings. CDC…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review,, the facility failed to provide a meaningful program of activities for three (#285, #32 and #133) of four residents reviewed for activities out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Ensure the facility provided consistent activity programming after 3:00 p.m. seven days a week; -Ensure Resident #285 was offered preferred activity programs in the evening and more than one program a day; -Ensure Resident #32 was offered a resident centered activity program including one-to-one social activities in her room; and, -Ensure Resident #133 was offered a resident centered activity program including independent leisure activities in her room. Findings include: I. Facility-wide activities The July 2021 activity calendar offered one group activity a day at 2:00 p.m. Twenty-six out of 31 days, no evening activities were offered and no group activity five out of 31 days. The August 2021 activity calendar offered one group activity a day at 2:00 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide needed care and services that meet professional standards of practice for of six (#187, #384, #189, #78, #40, #61) of nine residents reviewed for quality of care of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Provide wound care treatments as ordered for Resident #384, #78, #187; -Follow blood pressure medication parameters for Resident #40, #189; -Administer an antibiotic as ordered for Resident 189; and, -Have pain medication parameters for Resident #61. Findings include: I. Failure to provide wound care as ordered A. Resident #384 1. Resident status Resident #384, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included peripheral vascular disease (PVD), type II diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, muscle weakness, and cognitive communication deficit. The 8/20/21 minimum data set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #384…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-09-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and observations, the facility failed to store drugs and biologicals under proper temperature controls in one of two medication storage rooms reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: -Vaccine refrigerators maintained temperature parameters for vaccine storage; and, -Vaccine refrigerators with digital data logger thermometer. Findings include: I. Professional reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (August 18, 2021), Epidemiology and Prevention of Vaccine Preventable Diseases; Chapter 5: Storage and Handling, retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/vac-storage.html (retrieved on 9/30/21). The professional reference read in pertinent part: Every vaccine storage unit must have a reliable temperature monitoring device (TMD) which provides continuous monitoring and recording of temperatures via a digital data logger (DDL). The DDL provides recording of temperatures every 30 minutes, alarms for out-of-range temperatures, and provides details on how long a unit has been operating outside of the recommended temperature range…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive for one (#186) of five out of 38 sample residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: -Have an accurate Colorado medical orders for scope of treatment (MOST) form uploaded in the electronic medical record (EMR) for Resident #186, the MOST form uploaded was dated [DATE] for Full cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), however the physician orders in the EMR said do not resuscitate (DNR); -Obtain the medical durable power of attorney (MDPOA) signature timely for a new MOST form; and, -Date the new MOST form accurately when the MDPOA signature was obtained. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Advance Directives policy and procedure, revised [DATE], was provided by the nursing home administrator (NHA) on [DATE] at 9:49 a.m. It read in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-09-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (#187) out of three residents reviewed out of 38 sample residents were provided prompt efforts by the facility to resolve a grievance. Specifically, the facility failed timely follow-up with grievances from Resident #187. Findings include: I. Facility policy and procedure The Grievance policy and procedure, revised 2/8/21, was provided by the executive director (ED) on 9/29/21 at 6:35 p.m. It read in pertinent part, Each patient ., have the right to voice complaints and/or grievances without discrimination or the fear of reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care, treatment, or any other matters related to quality of care or quality of life. II. Resident #187 A. Resident status Resident #187, age [AGE], was admitted on [DATE]. According to the September 2021 computerized physician orders (CPO), diagnoses included type two diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, status post right foot incision and drainage (diabetic foot…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VERITAS MANAGEMENT GROUP — 13 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CO