Whitney Rehabilitation Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 233 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 135.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.92 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.51 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of clinical records, and facility policy for 1 of 5 sampled residents, (Resident #5) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision with toileting resulting in a fall with major injury. The findings include:Resident #5's diagnoses included fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur, difficulty in walking, weakness, reduced mobility, and need for assistance with personal care. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 7 indicating severe cognitive impairment, required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene and supervising/touching assistance with toilet transfers. A Morse Fall scale assessment dated [DATE] at 7:24 PM identified Resident #5 was at a high risk for falling. A Physical Therapy evaluation and plan of treatment evaluation dated 2/25/26 identified Resident #5 was an assist of two for transfers as his/her baseline. A Physician order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who had established advanced directives, the facility failed to ensure a resident with the status of do not perform any life sustaining cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNR) was honored and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was not initiated on [DATE] in accordance with the care plan. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), asthma, depression, anxiety, anemia, muscle weakness, dementia with behavioral disturbance and hallucinations. A physician's active order as of [DATE] directed Do Not Resuscitate (DNR), Do Not Intubate (DNI) and Registered Nurse may Pronounce (RNP). The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily living. The Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 and the authorized…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-06 · tag F0627 — pattern
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #42, Resident #133, and Resident #159) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan of care. The findings include: 1. Resident #42 's diagnoses included a non-displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of the right fibula, chronic myeloid leukemia, and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/16/26 identified Resident # 42 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) due to decreased mobility related to weakness. Interventions included providing the assistance from one staff with personal hygiene, bed mobility, toileting, transfers using a walker, ambulation, bathing, and dressing. The Resident Care plan failed to identify a discharge plan to return to the community. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating intact cognition and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and facility policy for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #14) reviewed for urinary catheters, the facility failed to provide a privacy cover for a urinary collection bag. The findings include:Resident #14's diagnoses included retention of urine, presence of urogenital implants and hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction.The significant change in status Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene and transfers. Additionally, it identified Resident #14 had an indwelling catheter.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/27/26 identified Resident #14 had an indwelling catheter related to retention and obstructive uropathy. Interventions directed to assess intake and output per facility policy, and position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical records, facility documentation, and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #42 and Resident #159) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of discharges from the facility. The findings include:1. Resident #42 's diagnoses included a non-displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of the right fibula, chronic myeloid leukemia, and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/16/26 identified Resident # 42 required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) due to decreased mobility related to weakness. Interventions included providing the assistance from one staff with personal hygiene, bed mobility, toileting, transfers using a walker, ambulation, bathing, and dressing. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 indicating intact cognition and required total assistance with dressing and toileting, substantial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #161) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for respiratory care including oxygen use and anxiety. The findings include: Resident #161 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder and polysubstance abuse. An admission physician's note dated 4/21/26 indicated Resident #161's chief complaint upon admission was shortness of breath and flu-like symptoms with acute on chronic respiratory failure, a history of end stage COPD on chronic prednisone and 2 liters of oxygen. Resident #161 presented with shortness of breath and flu-like symptoms and a history of aspiration pneumonia. During a recent hospitalization in January 2026, the resident developed suspected pulmonary edema with right ventricular strain and was admitted to the Intensive Care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #3 and 126) reviewed for range of motion and positioning, for Resident #3, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for a splinting device and failed to follow up on splinting device recommendations and for Resident #126 who had a contracture, the facility failed to apply palm guards to both hands per OT recommendations and physician's orders. The findings include:1. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included primary osteoarthritis, disorders of bone density and structure, and muscle weakness.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severe cognitive impairment, was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's) including eating, dressing and personal hygiene and received occupational and physical therapy at least 15 minutes a day on one or more days in the past 7 days. The Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge Summary signed by OT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews review of clinical records and policy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #59) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure oxygen administration was set according to the physician order. The findings include: Resident #59 diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, and emphysema. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also identified that the resident required set-up, or clean-up assistance with oral hygiene, was dependent with personal hygiene, and required substantial/maximal assistance with transfers. The MDS also identified that Resident #59 experienced shortness of breath or trouble breathing when lying flat and required supplemental oxygen while he/she was a resident within the last 14 days of the assessment date. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/6/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #36) reviewed for Hospice and End of Life, the facility failed manage the resident's pain according to professional standards. The findings include:Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in November 2020. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety disorder, and dementia with agitation.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 had severely impaired cognition, required total assistance with all care, had impairment of range of motion of the upper extremity on one side, was at risk to develop a pressure ulcer/injury, had no current pressure ulcers, and had no reports of pain. The care plan dated 2/4/26 identified the resident was at risk for pain and was on hospice care due to progressive decline. Interventions included assessing, treating, and documenting pain every shift and as needed, identifying the cause of pain and treat accordingly, administering pain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #52) the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed after providing personal care and failed to appropriately handle soiled linens. The findings include: Resident #52 had a diagnosis of dementia without behavioral disturbance. The nurse aide care card dated 2/2/26 identified Resident #52 required the assistance of 1 person for bathroom use. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #52 had severe cognitive impairment and required total assistance for toileting hygiene and personal hygiene. The Resident Care Plan dated 5/5/2026 identified the potential for alteration in skin integrity with an intervention for incontinent care/toileting 4 times per shift and as needed. Observation on 5/4/2026 at 10:40 am identified NA #8 exit Resident #52's bathroom with gloves on after providing personal care to the resident.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-09-19 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and a sample taste tray, the facility failed to ensure food was palatable. The findings include: Interview with Resident #45 on 8/26/24 at 11:30 AM identified he/she didn't like the taste of the food, and the food was of poor quality. Additionally, the cold food was not cold and there was not enough fresh fruit/vegetables provided. On 8/28/24 at 12:00 PM, a taste tray was conducted which consisted of cooked broccoli stems (no florets) and 2 manicotti (substituted for stuffed shells which were on the menu). Both items (broccoli stems and manicotti) were overcooked/mushy and extremely bland. Interview with the Food Service Director (FSD) at that time identified he was aware the broccoli was overcooked, and although there was a recipe to follow, the chef cooked the broccoli too long. He further identified although he doesn't conduct audits on the food quality, he does demonstrations with the cooks, but did not have any documentation to reflect what type of demonstrations he conducted. On 8/29/24 at 1:11 PM, during the Resident Council meeting Resident #53 indicated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MAYER FAMILY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT