No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Pawtucket Falls Healthcare Center

70 Gill Ave, Pawtucket, RI 02861 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 154 certified beds · (401) 722-7900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$241,130 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $241,130 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-16)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
109 Beechwood Ave · (401) 729-6151 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10 Newport Ave · (401) 722-7600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.4 mi
70 Newport Ave · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
711 Beverage Hill Ave · (401) 722-0965 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.1%19.6%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.6%17.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.4%16.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.4%16.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%95.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.4%22.3%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.2%22.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.6%2.0%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine66.2%78.2%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission10.7%24.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.7%14.6%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.6%CMS range 30.0–56.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 7.4–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.201.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.41
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.82
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
30.1%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 154 beds and averages 112.5 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-12)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility was not being administered in a manner that enabled it to utilize resources effectively and efficiently to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident related to infection control. This failure resulted in immediate jeopardy for F 880. Additionally, the Administrator directed an employee, who did not have a Food Safety Manager Certification, to work as the only cook in the main kitchen for all of the facility's residents. Findings are as follows: As a result of the survey investigation, it was determined that the Director of Housekeeping, Staff A, who tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/31/2024, was directed by the Administrator to report to the facility and work as the [NAME] on 8/3/2024 and 8/4/2024. Additionally, Staff A does not have a Food Safety Manager Certification to work as a cook. During a surveyor interview on 8/7/2024 at 10:24 AM with Staff A, she indicated that she was directed by the Administrator on 8/3/2024 to come into work on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to maintain an infection control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections by allowing a staff member who tested positive for COVID-19 on 7/31/2024, to work as the cook in the kitchen during the evening shift on 8/3/2024 and during the morning and evening shifts on 8/4/2024. Findings are as follows: Record review of the current guidance from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) titled, Interim Guidance for Managing Healthcare Personnel [HCP] with SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] Infection or Exposure to SARS-COV-2 states in part, Return to Work Criteria for HCP with SARS-CoV-2 Infection .HCP with mild to moderate illness who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised could return to work after the following criteria have been met: - At least 7 days have passed since symptoms first appeared if a negative viral test* is obtained within 48 hours prior to returning to work (or 10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to keep a resident free from sexual abuse for 1 of 6 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2. The facility also failed to screen newly admitted residents upon admission for their sex offender status (as required by the facility assessment) for 2 of 2 newly admitted residents from June 2023 through September of 2023, Resident ID #s 1 and 7, resulting in Resident ID #1 touching a vulnerable resident in a sexual manner, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: 1. The State Operations Manual Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, last revised 2/3/2023, states in part, .sexual contact is nonconsensual if the resident .lacks the cognitive ability to consent . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, dated October 2022, states in part, .The facility prohibits the .abuse of residents/patients .by anyone including staff, family, friends, etc . Record review of the facility assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision based on the risks and current professional standards of practice relative to preventing an incident by a known sex offender, Resident #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 10/30/2023 indicates that Resident ID #1 was observed grabbing Resident ID #2's chest in the hallway. Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention, dated October 2022, states in part, .Protocol 5. Implementation and ongoing monitoring consist of the following: Screening, Training, prevention, identification, protection, investigation, and reporting . Record review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed that known sex offenders would be denied admission to the facility. Record review revealed Resident ID #1, the alleged perpetrator, was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from verbal abuse for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1.Findings are as follows:Record review of a facility-reported incident received by the Rhode Island Department of Health on 3/13/2026 revealed that Nursing Assistant, Staff A, was reported to have been verbally abusive towards Resident ID #1.Record review of a facility policy titled Abuse prohibition revealed in part, .Verbal Abuse = Oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to the resident/patient or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe resident/patient, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability.Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in March of 2026 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, hypertension (high blood pressure).Record review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff, and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents reviewed who alleged staff to resident abuse, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 12/14/2024 revealed a verbal altercation occurred between Resident ID #2 and a staff member regarding his/her roommate's care. Further review revealed the staff member was suspended pending the facility's investigation and removed from the resident's roommate's assignment. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility in December of 2019 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. During a surveyor interview on 12/23/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion (ROM) receives appropriate treatment and services to increase ROM and/or to prevent further decrease in ROM for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with contractures, Resident ID #13. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility's policy titled Splints/Orthotics/Prosthetics [medical devices used to assist when physical impairments or limitations are present] states in part, Residents will receive splint/orthotics/prosthetics as deemed appropriate by the physician and rehabilitation services .Nursing staff will apply/remove the designated splint/orthotics/prosthetic device during scheduled wearing times . Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in November of 2024 with diagnosis including, but not limited to, Parkinson disease (a progressive neurological disorder that causes nerve cells in the brain to die which affects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis (a treatment that removes excess fluid, waste, and toxins from the blood when the kidneys are no longer functioning properly) receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for fluid restrictions, Resident ID #30. Findings are as follows: Record review of a facility policy titled Fluid Restrictions states in part, .The fluid restriction breakdown should be documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR), as well as dietary or tray card . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, end stage renal disease (a medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for a regular course of long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life) and cerebral infarction (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, resident, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that assessments accurately reflect the residents' status for 1 of 1 resident reviewed relative to a fall with injury, Resident ID #75. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed Resident ID #75 was readmitted to the facility in September of 2024 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, unspecified fracture of the lower end of the left radius (a long bone in the forearm that helps you move your arm and wrist). Review of a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14 out of 15 indicating intact cognitive function. Record review of Residents ID #75's progress notes revealed the following: - 9/18/2024 at 5:22 AM revealed the resident was found in a sitting position on the floor in his/her room and was complaining of pain to his/her left wrist with swelling noted. - 9/18/2024 at 6:55 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician's order for obtaining orthostatic blood pressure (a form of low blood pressure that happens when standing up from a sitting or lying down position) for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, Resident ID #76. Findings are as follows: According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing, page 314, states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physicians' orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients. According to Jensen's 4th Edition, Nursing Health Assessment, A Clinical Judgement Approach page 118 states in part, Orthostatic vital signs are measured in patients to assess for a drop in blood pressure and heart rate with position changes .Assess BP [blood pressure] with patient supine [lying position] sitting, and then standing. The patient should rest supine for at least 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses have specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, relative to indwelling urinary catheters (a thin hollow tube that is inserted through the urethra into the bladder to drain urine, which is held in place by a water filled balloon), Staff B, C and D. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/7/2024, alleges in part that Resident ID #4's indwelling urinary catheter was placed incorrectly at the facility. According to a [NAME], [NAME], and [NAME] article found in Nursing 2024, titled, Inserting an indwelling urinary catheter in a [gender redacted] patient, states in part, .grasp the catheter two to three inches from the tip and gently insert it into the urethral opening .Continue inserting until urine flows, then advance one to two more inches . Record review revealed Resident ID #4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to prepare, serve and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as the facility failed to have any certified food protection managers available during the preparation of evening meals on 7/1, 7/7, 7/15, 7/20 and 8/3/2024 or during the preparation of all the meals on 8/4/2024. Findings are as follows: Review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 2-102.12, Certified Food Protection Manager states in part, (A) At least one employee that has supervisory and management responsibility and the authority to direct and control food preparation and service shall be a certified food protection manager who has shown proficiency of required information through passing a test that is part of an accredited program . Additional review of the Rhode Island Food Code, 2018 Edition, section 2-102.20, Food Protection Manager Certification, states in part, (A) A person in charge who demonstrates knowledge by being a food protection manager that is certified by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication administration, Resident ID #5. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in July of 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (the impairment of gas exchange between the lungs and the blood causing a lack of oxygen), atrial fibrillation (afib; a condition in which the heart pumps irregularly), alcohol dependence, urinary retention and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of a hospital Continuity of Care - Post-Acute Facility document dated 7/15/2024 indicated the resident was diagnosed with urinary retention and failed voiding trials on various occasions. During his/her hospital stay, s/he had a urology consult and a urinary catheter was placed and ordered to remain in place until the resident was seen by urology for an evaluation. Additional review of the document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-16 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — pattern
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all newly hired employees and annual training for existing employees consistent with their expected roles, relative to education involving abuse, infection control, dementia behavioral health management, trauma informed care and QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) per the facility assessment, for 9 of 9 newly hired or existing employees, Staff A, B, C, D, F, G, H, I and J. . Findings are as follows: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated 11/15/2023, reveals in part, .[The facility] provides the following training topics .that include, but are not limited to: In-Service Resident's Rights . Abuse, neglect, and exploitation . Care/management for persons with dementia . QAPI . Infection Control (PPE-personal protective equipment), Hand Hygiene) . Behavioral Health . Record review revealed the Director of Housekeeping, Staff A, was hired on 5/21/2021. Additionally, her personnel file failed to reveal evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of bed-hold policy to the resident or resident representative, prior to the transfer of the resident to the hospital, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #2. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint reported to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/6/2024 alleges, Resident ID #2 was discharged from the facility on 5/2/2024 to the hospital. On 5/3/2024 the hospital case manager was informed by the facility that the resident did not place a bed hold and the facility had already filled his/her bed. The resident was not provided with a bed hold form prior to exiting the building. Record review for Resident ID #2 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in April 2024 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute pyelonephritis (bacterial infection causing inflammation of the kidneys) morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Record review of a progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-13 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of the resident's admission that includes instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care that meets professional standards of quality care, the resident's immediate health and safety needs, physician and dietary orders as well as therapy and social services for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID # 2. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint reported to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/6/2024, revealed that a resident was discharged from the facility on 5/2/2024 to the hospital and on 5/3/2024 the hospital case manager was informed by the facility that the resident did not place a bed hold and the facility had already filled his/her bed. Record review revealed Resident ID #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, acute pyelonephritis (bacterial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the that the facility failed to ensure that the resident's Advanced Directive requesting to refuse lifesaving treatment was followed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled Resident's Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives [a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity] states in part .ensure resident's wishes are met regarding Advanced Directives .it is the resident's right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment .on admission the facility will determine if the resident has executed an Advanced Directive . Closed record review for Resident ID #1 revealed diagnoses that include, but are not limited to, Gangrene (death of body tissue due to a lack of blood flow or a serious bacterial infection) and chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was revised by the interdisciplinary team for 3 of 6 residents reviewed for advanced directives, Resident ID #s 2, 23, and 45. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy dated 1/2017 and titled, Advanced Directives states in part, .the resident has a right to refuse treatment and to formulate an Advanced Directive .the facility will abide by the resident's advanced directive .social services and/or medical staff must inform the Executive Director whenever a resident, family member, etc. expresses a desire to change advance directives . Review of a facility policy titled Care Planning dated 6/2023, states in part, .the facility will develop a comprehensive, resident centered care plan for each resident .the interdisciplinary team will meet when a change in condition occurs and annually to develop the comprehensive, resident centered plan of care for each resident .the goals shall be specific and agreed upon by the resident, family, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for care of a resident for 4 of 4 residents reviewed with catheters, Resident ID #s 2, 4, 35 and 54. Findings are as follows: According to The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) document titled, Guideline for Prevention of Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections [UTI] 2009, states in part, .Proper techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance .Do not rest the bag on the floor . Record review of a facility policy titled Catheter-Foley states in part, .empty the Foley bag every 8 hours, or when the drainage bag is 2/3 full to avoid traction on the catheter from the weight of the drainage bag to prevent infection . 1. Record review for Resident ID #2 revealed that s/he was readmitted to the facility in September of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and urinary tract infections. Additional record review revealed the resident has a suprapubic catheter (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are trauma survivors, receive culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents experiences, and preferences, in order to eliminate, or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident for 10 of 15 residents reviewed for Trauma Informed Care, Resident ID #s 2, 9, 23, 24, 35, 45, 49, 54, 58, and 59. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, states in part, .on admission, upon significant change in condition that includes changes in mood state and behavior, evaluate for any history of a traumatic experience they may have experienced .when a resident is unable to complete the screening tool the representative will be interviewed and the Trauma Informed Questionnaire will be completed by the Representative .the Social Worker will document the findings of the Trauma Informed Questionnaire in the initial Psychosocial history . Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms and 2 of 2 medication carts observed. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised 8/2020, states in part, .Expiration Dating .Certain medications or package types, such as .multiple dose injectable vials .require an expiration date shorter than the manufacturer's expiration date once opened .When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the container or vial will be dated .all expired medications will be removed from the active supply . 1. During a surveyor observation of the School Street Unit medication cart on 12/12/2023 at 12:07 PM, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Staff A, the following was revealed: - 2 boxes (each containing three tubes) of Microdot Glucose Gel fast acting glucose gel 40% (used to treat low blood sugar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing for 1 of 1 resident reviewed who has an actual pressure injury, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Review of the policy titled, Non-Sterile Dressing Change, states in part, .Procedure .If dressings need to be cut to size, use clean or sterile scissors .remove soiled dressing .remove gloves, wash hands, apply new gloves .clean wound .Remove gloves, wash hands, apply new gloves .apply wound dressing . Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2018 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with skin complications. Review of the care plan, initiated on 5/17/2022, revealed the resident has an actual impairment to his/her skin integrity relative to a stage 4 pressure wound (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident ID #19. Findings are as follows: According to Brunner and Sudarth's textbook, Medical and Surgical Nursing, 7th Edition, 1992, p. 524, as with other medications, oxygen is administered with care, and its effects on each patient are carefully assessed. Oxygen is a drug and except in emergency situations is prescribed by a physician. Record review of a facility policy titled, Nasal Cannula states in part, .Procedure .verify physician orders .set flow meter per physician order . Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in December of 2017, with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, anxiety disorder. Surveyor observations of the resident while in his/her room on 12/11, 12/12 and 12/13/2023 revealed there was an oxygen concentrator by the resident's bedside with tubing dated 9/25 6:00 AM. Additional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a blood pressure medications with parameters, Resident ID #4. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility in September of 2018 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, hypertension. Record review revealed a physician's order, dated 10/31/2023, for Metoprolol Tartrate (medication used to treat high blood pressure) 50 mg (milligram) tablet to be administered twice daily with instructions to hold for a systolic blood pressure of less than 100. Further review revealed an additional parameter to hold this medication for the heart rate, however a heart rate parameter was not included in the order. Review of the Medication Administration Records, from November 2023 through 12/13/2023 revealed the metoprolol medication was administered twice daily. Review of the record failed to reveal evidence that the resident's blood pressure and heart rate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview it has been determined that the facility failed to be administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 2 out of 2 residents related to determining if a resident was a registered sex offender prior to admission from June of 2023 until September of 2023, Resident ID #s 1 and 7. Findings are as follows: Record review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] revealed known sex offenders would be denied admission to the facility. Record review revealed Resident ID #1, was admitted to the facility in September of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, altered mental status, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review failed to reveal evidence that the National Sex Offender Public Website was checked prior to the facility admitting Resident ID #1. Additional record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0636 — widespread
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to conduct a comprehensive assessment using the resident assessment instrument (RAI), for 10 of 33 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 9, 36, 38, 56, 62, 65, 69, 208, 357, and 360. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #9 revealed that a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment that was due on 11/8/2022 was incomplete. 2. Record review for Resident ID #36 revealed that an admission MDS that was due on 6/28/2022 was incomplete. 3. Record review for Resident ID #38 revealed that an annual MDS that was due on 11/19/2022 was incomplete. 4. Record review for Resident ID #56 revealed that an admission MDS that was due on 5/20/2022 was incomplete. 5. Record review for Resident ID #62 revealed that an annual MDS assessment that was due on 9/21/2022 was incomplete. 6. Record review for Resident ID #65 revealed that an admission MDS that was due on 12/14/2022 was incomplete. 7. Record review for Resident ID #69 revealed that an admission MDS that was due on 6/12/2022 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0638 — widespread
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to assess a resident using the quarterly review instrument specified by the State and approved by CMS not less frequently than once every 3 months for 18 of 33 residents, Resident ID #s 8, 9, 11, 15, 24, 31, 36, 45, 50, 51, 57, 62, 78, 80, 155, 206, 216 and 360. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #8 revealed the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments that were due on 5/14/2022 and 11/10/2022 were incomplete. 2. Record review for Resident ID #9 revealed the quarterly MDS assessment that was due on 5/25/2022 was incomplete. 3. Record review for Resident ID #11 revealed the quarterly MDS assessments that were due on 5/27/2022 and 11/25/2022 were incomplete. 4. Record review for Resident ID #15 revealed the quarterly MDS assessment that was due on 10/9/2022 was incomplete. 5. Record review for Resident ID #24 revealed the quarterly MDS assessment that was due on 11/10/2022 was incomplete. 6. Record review for Resident ID #31 revealed the quarterly MDS assessment that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to electronically transmit data after a facility completed a resident's assessment for 14 of 33 residents, Residents ID #s 4, 9, 31, 44, 56, 67, 70, 73, 77, 78, 83, 84, and 110. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #4 revealed the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, dated 5/10/2022 and 11/8/2022, were completed but not electronically transmitted as required. 2. Record review for Resident ID #9 revealed the discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was not completed or transmitted. 3. Record review for Resident ID #31 revealed the discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was not completed or transmitted. 4. Record review for Resident ID #44 revealed the discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was not completed or transmitted. 5. Record review for Resident ID #56 revealed the Comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], and the discharge MDS, dated [DATE], was not completed or transmitted. 6. Record review for Resident ID #66 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that the facility stores, distributes, and serves food in accordance with professional standards for food safety relative to the main kitchen and 4 of 4 unit kitchenettes. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review of the Rhode Island Food Code 2018 edition, section 3-501.17 states in part, .(B) Except as specified paragraphs (E)-(G) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a FOOD PROCESSING PLANT shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT and if the FOOD is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded, based on the temperature and time combination specified in paragraph (A) of this section and: (1) The day the original container is opened and the FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be counted as Day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility has failed to set priorities for its performance improvement activities that focus on problem-prone areas, consider the incidence, prevalence, and severity of problems in those areas and take actions aimed at performance improvement, measure its success, and track performance to ensure improvements are realized and sustained related to resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completion and timing. Findings are as follows: Record review of the MDS assessments of 33 discharged and current residents revealed MDS assessments which were not completed or submitted timely. During a surveyor interview on 1/19/2023 at 3:17 PM with the MDS Coordinator, she acknowledged that the facility was aware that there was a problem with completing MDS assessments. During a surveyor interview on 1/20/2023 at approximately 10:00 AM with the Administrator, she revealed that a decision is made about a concern going to QAPI when a problem spans throughout the facility and that areas are tracked until they reach a 95%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-23 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to follow the manufacturer's instructions when COVID-19 rapid testing residents, for 14 of 14 residents observed, Resident ID #'s 11, 24, 27, 38, 45, 62, 85, 315, 316, 355, 356, 357, 359, and 362. Findings are as follows: The Centers for Disease Control document titled, Guidance for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Testing Performed in Point-of-Care Settings, updated on 4/4/2022, states in part: .During the test .When processing multiple specimens successively in batches, ensure proper timing for each specimen .as specified by the test manufacturer .After the test .Read and record results only within the amount of time specified in the manufacturer's instructions. Do not record results from tests that have not been read within the manufacturer's specified timeframe . Review of the [NAME] BinaxNow COVID-19 Ag card (a type of test called an antigen test. Antigen tests are designed to detect proteins from the virus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 3 of 8 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (a localized injury to the skin or underlying tissue due to pressure), Resident ID #s 4, 72, and 155. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #4 revealed s/he was admitted to the facility in October of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) and muscle weakness. Review of the WOUND EVALUATION & MANAGEMENT SUMMARY revealed the resident has a stage 4 pressure ulcer (the most serious wound, that extends into the deep tissues, including muscle, tendons, and ligaments) to the resident's left ischium (lower and back of hip bone) and a skin tear to the left lower buttock. Further record review of the above wound evaluation revealed the following recommendations by the wound physician: -12/7/2022 .ISCHIUM .Peri wound Treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight and failed to follow their policy relative to weight loss and weight gain for 2 of 11 residents reviewed, Resident ID #s 31 and 69. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Loss/Gain Protocol, states in part . PROCEDURE .a significant weight discrepancy is defined as: 1. A weight change of 3 pounds or more in one week (if resident on weekly weights); 2. A loss/gain of 5% or greater within one month .1. WHEN A SIGNIFICANT WEIGHT LOSS/GAIN IS NOTED .THE FOLLOWING INTERVENTIONS MUST OCCUR: .All monthly weights must be done by the end of the first two (2) weeks of the month. 1. Reweigh all residents who are reported to have a significant weight discrepancy in order to assess the accuracy of the weight. The reweigh shall be done within 48 hours .2. If the re-weigh is accurate and there has been a significant weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to ensure a resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs for 1 of 7 residents reviewed, Resident ID #65. Findings are as follows: Review of the resident's record revealed s/he was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, closed hip fracture, pelvic fracture, and Alzheimer's Disease. Record review of a document titled, Continuity of Care [COC]- Post-Acute Facility dated 11/5/2022, revealed the following medication order that was to continue upon re-admission to the facility: - Omeprazole (medication used to treat certain stomach and esophagus problems) 20 milligrams (mg) delayed release tablet, take one tablet, 20 mg total by mouth daily. Record review of the physician orders revealed an order dated 11/5/2022 for Omeprazole 20 mg delayed release tablet, give 20 mg by mouth before meals. Record review of the November and December 2022 and the January 2023 Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed, upon a resident's death, to convey within 30 days the resident's funds and a final accounting of those funds to the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with state law for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for personal needs funds handled by the facility, Resident ID #'s 108 and 109. Findings are as follows: Rhode Island State Regulation under section 2.4 (H) of the Uniform Accountability Procedures for Title XIX Resident Personal Needs Funds in Community Nursing Facilities, ICF/DD Facilities, and Assisted Living Residences' requires that the facility shall: .(c) Upon the death of a Medicaid resident, a facility shall, within 10 days, transmit a notarized statement (see form available for downloading on the EOHHS website: www.eohhs.ri.gov) indicating the amount of personal needs money on hand after funeral expenses. Funeral expenses are designated to be the first paid. Copies of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to communicate the appropriate information to the receiving health care institution or provider to ensure a safe and effective transition of care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #105. Findings are as follows: Review of the resident's record revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility in November of 2022, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart) and old myocardial infarction (heart attack). Further review of the record revealed that s/he was discharged from the facility on 12/31/2022. Review of the care plan, revised on 12/12/2022, revealed that the resident is at risk for developing complications secondary to having anticoagulant therapy with an intervention to obtain and report labs as ordered. Additional record review revealed that s/he has impaired cognitive function with an intervention to communicate with his/her family members/caregivers regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments reflecting the residents' status for 2 of 8 residents reviewed relative to weekly skin assessments, Residents ID #s 62 and 155. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review revealed Resident ID #62 was admitted to the facility in September of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stroke and status post Gastrostomy (G-tube; A tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach. It allows air and fluid to leave the stomach and can be used to give drugs and liquids, including liquid food, to the patient). Record review revealed a physician's order dated 11/14/2022 for Weekly Skin Checks Every Saturday on Day . Record review of the SKIN OBSERVATION TOOL revealed the following: -1/7/2023 .Skin CDI [clean, dry, intact] . -1/14/2023 .Skin CDI . During a surveyor observation on 1/19/2023 at 2:05 PM of the resident in the presence of the Registered Nurse, Staff B, revealed the resident has a G-tube surgical site on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined the facility failed to provide the necessary services to a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) relative to personal hygiene for 3 of 6 sample residents observed, Resident ID #'s 8, 57, and 106. Findings are as follows: 1. Record review for Resident ID #8 revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in October of 2017 with diagnoses to include, but are not limited to, muscle weakness and chronic kidney disease. Record review of a care plan dated 12/9/2020 and revised on 2/18/2021 revealed, The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] Activity Intolerance and Disease process .Resident requires staff assist to complete ADL tasks daily. Fluctuations are expected r/t Diagnosis . This care plan has interventions including, but not limited to, .HYGIENE/GROOMING: LIMITED ASSIST X 1 .PERSONAL HYGIENE: The resident requires limited assistance by 1 staff with personal hygiene . During surveyor observations of the resident's finger nails on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive proper treatment and care to maintain good foot health and assistance with making appointments with a qualified person for 1 of 1 residents reviewed relative to foot care, Resident ID #72. Findings are as follows: Record review for the resident revealed that s/he was re-admitted to the facility in October of 2022 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other circulatory complications and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the order summary report revealed a current order, dated 10/25/2022, stating podiatry may be consulted as needed. Further review of this documentation revealed an order, dated 12/13/2022, to provide diabetic foot care every day at night including observation of feet, toes, ankles, and soles. Review of wound consultation documentation, dated 11/30/2022, revealed in part, .Please have podiatry cut patient's toenails . Record review failed to reveal evidence that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care, Resident ID #s 262 and 357. Findings are as follows: According to Brunner and Sudarth's textbook, Medical and Surgical Nursing, 7th Edition, 1992, p. 524, as with other medications, oxygen is administered with care, and its effects on each patient are carefully assessed. Oxygen is a drug and except in emergency situations is prescribed by a physician. Record review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration revealed in part, .verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's order or facility protocol for oxygen [O2] administration .Documentation .The date and time that the procedure was performed .The name and title of the individual who performed the procedure .the rate of oxygen flow, route, and rationale .The frequency and duration of the treatment .reason for p.r.n. [as needed] administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist provide orders for the resident's immediate care needs and that the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for medication orders, Resident ID #69. Findings are as follows: Record review for the resident revealed a physician's order dated 1/4/2023 for olanzapine (antipsychotic used to treat mental disorders) 2.5 milligrams (mg) by mouth one time a day for anxiety for 14 days then re-evaluate. Further record review revealed a progress note dated 1/16/2023, authored by the Registered Nurse Practitioner, Staff J, that states in part, .Assessment and Plan .Restlessness/agitation/anxiety - c/w [continue with] .olanzapine, monitor for behavioral disturbances . Record review of the January 2023 Medication Administration Record revealed that the olanzapine order failed to be continued after 1/17/2023. During a surveyor interview on 1/20/2023 at 1:46 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days for 1 of 6 residents reviewed relative to unnecessary medications, Resident ID #62. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in September of 2021 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, stroke and muscle weakness. Record review revealed a physician's order dated 12/20/2022 for, LORazepam Intensol Concentrate 2 MG [milligram]/ML [milliliter] .Give 0.5 mg via G-tube [feeding tube] every 6 hours as needed for Anxiety . Further record review failed to reveal evidence that the above PRN order was limited to 14 days. Additionally, there was no documentation relative to the rationale or duration of the PRN order by the physician or prescribing practitioner in the resident's medical record. Additional record review revealed the resident received 3 doses of Lorazepam (after 14 days) on the following dates and times: - 1/4/2023 at 3:02 AM - 1/14/2023 at 6:00 AM -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on surveyor observation, record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biological's in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 1 of 1 nursing stations observed. Findings are as follows: Review of a policy titled, Storage of Medications revised in November of 2020, states in part, .Drugs and biological's used in the facility are stored in locked compartments under proper temperature, light and humidity controls. Only persons authorized to prepare and administer medications have access to locked medications . A continuous surveyor observation on 1/19/2023 from 8:34 AM until 9:21 AM of the first-floor Central unit revealed the following medication cards left unsecured and unattended on the nurses' desk: -A medication blister pack of Mirtazapine 15 Milligram (mg) (antidepressant) for Resident ID #69 containing 14 tablets. -A medication blister pack of Atorvastatin 10 mg (medication to treat high cholesterol) for Resident ID #65 containing 14 tablets. -A medication blister pack of Mycophenolat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-23 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist of laboratory results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #105. Findings are as follows: Review of the resident's record revealed that s/he was admitted to the facility in November of 2022, with diagnoses including, but not limited to, heart failure, chronic atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm that can lead to blood clots in the heart), old myocardial infarction (heart attack), and hypertension. Review of the care plan, revised on 12/12/2022, revealed an intervention to obtain and report labs as ordered. Review a document titled Order Summary Report, revealed in part, the following orders: - 12/28/2022 order for PT/INR lab (Used to measure the time it takes for blood to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-12-13 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect identifying information for 13 residents listed in the facility's survey results binder, Resident ID #s 4, 6, 26, 27, 30, 31, 43, 49, 52, 463, 464, 465, and 466. Findings are as follows: During a surveyor observation on 12/12/2023 at approximately 2:30 PM, the survey results binder for 2023 was observed to be in a bin outside of the Administrator's office, in a common area of the facility. Record review of the survey results binder revealed the following: - Survey results for exit date 3/10/2023 with a staff/resident roster attached, identifying Resident ID #43 - Survey results for exit date 4/5/2023 with a staff/resident roster attached, identifying Resident ID #463 - Survey results for exit date 11/6/2023 with a staff/resident roster attached, identifying Resident ID #s 464, 27, 31, 30, 26, 6, 52, 465, 466, 4, and 49 Further record review of the above surveys with the attached rosters contained information including, but not limited to, physician's orders and medical diagnoses.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$241,130 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $193,160 — penalty dated 2024-08-16
  • $47,970 — penalty dated 2023-11-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MAYER FAMILY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.9-1.9 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.6-1.6 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
The other 10 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.9★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BERKOWITZ, LEAHIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 08/15/2023
MAYER, GIORGIOIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 08/15/2023
AKHTAR, ALIIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2024
CRESPO, STEPHENIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 08/15/2023
ELKINS, STEVENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/08/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-61.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 5%Other / private 28%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$528per resident / day
operating cost
$16,055per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$328per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Rhode Island Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Rhode Island
$12,106/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,383/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,781/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 415064. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next