Affinity Skilled Living and Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 400 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 216 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 280 beds and averages 257.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 23 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.33 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-07-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and interviews during survey, the facility failed to protect a resident from abuse, psychosocial harm, and to respond appropriately following an allegation of staff-to-resident sexual abuse for one of 16 sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, on 06/20/2026 Resident #1 alleged Certified Nursing Assistant #1 raped them while providing incontinence care, and the facility failed to implement interventions to address Resident #1's physical and psychosocial needs. Resident #1 remained in the facility for five and a half hours following the allegation without documentation of a medical or psychosocial assessment. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #1 that was Immediate Jeopardy and likely placed other vulnerable residents at risk for serious harm, serious injury, serious impairment, or death. The Finding is: The facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Policy reviewed on 06/20/2026, documented all alleged incidents of abuse and or neglect will be investigated. Injuries of unknown origin will be investigated to rule out…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during survey, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were reported to the Department of Health and local law enforcement no later than two hours after the allegations were made. This was identified for one resident (Resident#1) of 16 residents. Specifically, Resident#1 alleged that on 06/20/2026, Certified Nursing Assistant #1 sexually abused them while providing care. There is no documented evidence that the alleged sexual abuse was reported to local law enforcement or the New York State Department of Health as required. The facility's failure to report the incident to the New York State Department of Health posed the likelihood of harm to Resident #1 which was immediate Jeopardy and potential for harm to the other 16 residents.The findings are:The facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect, dated 04/22/2026 and reviewed June 2026, documented alleged incidents of abuse and neglect will be investigated and injuries of unknown origin will be investigated to rule out abuse,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and reviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received treatment and care based on their comprehensive assessment in accordance with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #180) of one (1) resident reviewed for physical restraints. Specifically, Resident #180 with severely impaired cognition had a diagnosis of down syndrome and a facility acquired stage III pressure ulcer (a deep, full-thickness wound extending through the skin into subcutaneous fat, but not exposing muscle, tendon, or bone) to their right buttock. Resident #180 was unable to verbalize their needs and required total assistance from two (2) staff members with all aspects of care except for eating. On 03/12/2026 at 4:20 AM and 5:06 AM, Resident #180 was observed sleeping in a dark room while seated upright in a tilt-in-space wheelchair (a specialized wheelchair that tilts the user backward for redistributing pressure from the buttocks to the back to prevent pressure sores). Resident #180 was physically restrained with an upper…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #180) of five (5) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers. Specifically, Resident #180 was admitted to the facility with no pressure ulcers and was assessed to be at risk for developing pressure ulcers, was incontinent of bowel and bladder, and used a Posey restraint (device to limit patient movements) in their wheelchair at night. On 01/01/2026: Developed a Stage 2 (a partial-thickness skin loss) ulcer on the coccyx (small triangular bone at the bottom of the spine). On 01/06/2026: Developed an unstageable ulcer (full-thickness tissue loss where the wound bed is fully covered by dead tissue) on the right buttock. On 01/20/2026: Right buttock wound required debridement (the medical removal of dead, damaged, or infected tissue from a wound to promote…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00287059) initiated on 1/5/2023 and completed on 1/13/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #310) of three residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #310 had a history of multiple falls and was identified at risk for falls. Resident #310 was to be placed in a high visibility observational area when out of bed as per the resident's plan of care. On 11/24/2021 Resident #310 was left unsupervised when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 did not follow their assignment to monitor the Northeast TV lounge that was designated by the facility as a high visibility area. Resident #310 ambulated down the hallway to their room and fell sustaining a fracture to the right hip. This resulted in actual harm for Resident #310 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The facility's policy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the abbreviated survey (Intake # 3052049) the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 alleged a Certified Nursing Assistant raped them while providing incontinence care. The facility's investigative report revealed no written or recorded statement from the resident detailing the allegation, which limited the facility's ability to objectively investigate the allegation. The facility's reported that Resident #1 changed their description of the allegation and the facility reached a conclusion rather than completing a comprehensive investigation of all evidence. Based on observations, interviews, and record review during the abbreviated survey (Intake # 3052049) the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of an allegation of staff to resident abuse for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #1 alleged a Certified Nursing Assistant raped them while providing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-07-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the abbreviated Survey the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified for (1) (Resident #1), of sixteen residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving sexual abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreating are reported immediately or not later than 2 hours to the Department of Health and Local Law Enforcement after the allegations are made. Additionally, the alleged incident Caused Resident #1 psychosocial harm. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 by allowing male Nursing Supervisor#1 to perform a nursing assessment with no other staff member with them after the alleged rape allegation incident. Additionally, the facility did not provide a social worker visit or psychosocial interventions to Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet each resident's medical and nursing needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, Resident #12 had a physician's order for contact precautions due to extended-spectrum -lactamase infection (antibiotic resistant bacteria) in the coccyx wound and enhanced barrier precautions for the wounds on both heels. There was no comprehensive care plan developed with interventions to address the resident's enhanced barrier precaution and contact precautions status.The finding is:The facility comprehensive care plan policy last reviewed on 2/2/2026 documented a comprehensive person-centered care plan including measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident was treated with respect and dignity and in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of their quality of life. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #104) of two (2) residents reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, during multiple observations, Resident #104 was observed in their room with a urinary catheter drainage bag that was not covered. The urinary catheter drainage bag was half-filled with urine and was visible from the hallway. The finding is:The facility's policy titled, Dignity last revised on 02/02/2026 documented that residents shall be treated with Dignity and respect at all times. Treated with Dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing their self-esteem and self-worth. Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited. Staff shall promote dignity and assist residents as needed, including keeping the urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident had secure and confidential medical records. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #27) of five (5) residents reviewed for the Medication Administration Task. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 left Resident #27's electronic record open in the hallway with the personal and medical information visible to other staff, residents, and visitors.The finding is:Resident #27 was admitted with diagnoses that included fracture of the finger in the right hand, cerebral infarction (lack of blood supply to the brain tissue causing tissue death), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (long-term lung disease that makes breathing difficult). The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score was not completed as Resident #27 was rarely or never understood.During a medication pass observation on 03/10/2026 at 6:33 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 went into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident was free from physical restraints that was used for the purpose of discipline or convivence; and that the restraint was used to treat the residents' medical conditions with ongoing re-evaluation of the need for the physical restraint. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #180) of one (1) resident reviewed for restraints. Specifically, Resident #180 had diagnoses including down syndrome with severely impaired cognition and a facility acquired stage 3 pressure ulcer to their right buttock. Resident #180 was physically restrained with an upper body Posey belt (a harness-like belt that wraps the resident's trunk to keep the resident in an upright position) with no documented evidence of a physician's order, the medical necessity, care instructions for nursing staff, or ongoing monitoring and re-evaluation of the need for the physical restraint. Additionally, there was no documented evidence that a consent to use the restraint was obtained and the resident representatives were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility did not ensure that each resident's environment remained free of accident hazards. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #28) of four (4) residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, an unsecured oxygen E-Cylinder tank (a portable, high-capacity metal cylinder used to store compressed medical grade oxygen) was observed on Resident 21's bed side. The E-Cylinder tank was not secured in a holder or a metal rack.The finding is: The facility's policy, titled Oxygen Cylinder Storage last revised on 02/02/2026, documented that the facility will store, handle, and maintain oxygen cylinders in a safe manner. Oxygen cylinders should be stored to prevent tipping, damage, contamination, or fire hazards and should be readily accessible for resident care needs while ensuring staff and resident safety. Oxygen cylinders must be secured using racks, chains, straps, or approved carts. Cylinders must never be stored loosely on the floor. Cylinders must be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents who have an indwelling catheter received the appropriate care and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible. This was identified for one (1) (Resident # 40) of four (4) residents reviewed for Urinary Catheter. Specifically, Resident #40 was admitted to the facility with a chronic long-term Foley catheter. On 03/09/2026, Resident #40 was observed with the Foley catheter drainage bag stored above their waistline causing potential for urinary retention and the urine to flow back into the bladder.The finding is: The facility policy and procedure for Foley Catheter dated 2/2/2026 documented that the purpose of this procedure is to prevent infection of the resident's urinary tract. The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder. Resident #40 was admitted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews during a recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure the provision of care and services necessary to maintain acceptable parameters of hydration status. This was identified for one (1) (Resident #277) of eight (8) residents reviewed for nutrition and for one (1) (Resident #14) of one (1) resident reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically. The facility did not monitor and document the fluid intake for Resident #277 and Resident #14 who had a physician ordered 1200 milliliter (mL) fluid restriction. As a result, the facility staff were unable to determine whether the residents' prescribed fluid restriction orders were followed, placing the residents at risk for fluid imbalance.The findings are: A facility policy and procedure titled Fluid Restriction, dated 02/02/2026, documented fluid restrictions will be followed as per Physician's orders and follows the procedures: the amount of fluid allowed in a 24-hour period will be specified in a physician's order and sent to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure medications were properly stored in medication carts. This was identified for one (1) (Unit 3 southwest medication cart) of eight (8) medication carts reviewed during the medication storage task and Medication Administration task. Specifically, an unlocked and unsupervised medication cart was observed on unit 3 southwest in the hallway. There was no nursing staff present in the vicinity of the medication cart.The finding is:The facility policy titled Storage of Medications last reviewed 02/02/2026, documented the medication nurse on duty is responsible for the security of the carts contents. The cart must be locked and secure at all times when not in use.The facility policy titled Medication Administration, last reviewed 02/02/2026 documented to keep all mediations under lock and key.During a medication pass observation on 03/10/2026 at 6:33 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse #1 went into Resident 27's room to administer their medications. Licensed Practical Nurse #1 left the unlocked medication cart unsecured…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$82,500 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $82,500 — penalty dated 2026-03-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MAYER FAMILY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY