Valley View Manor Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 76.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.95 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 35% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for two (2) of two (2) resident units (North and South units) and the main front entrance. Specifically, the North and South units had strong urine odors, and unclean walls and floors; and the main front entrance had trash that littered the walkway areas.Findings include: The undated facility policy In-service - Daily Cleaning, documented the objective of a daily cleaning was to ensure cleanliness and safety. Daily cleanings should be performed as follows: trash receptacles should be emptied along with bedside bags, each housekeeper should use good judgement when determining the frequency of trash removal keeping odor control in mind; the housekeep should clean all spots, spills, or scuff marks on vertical surfaces such as walls, doors, and over bed tables; the entire floor must be dry mopped; and the entire floor must be wet mopped, not to forget to mop under the bed, closet floor,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-06 · tag F0840 — pattern
  Employ or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure specific services outside the facility when the facility did not employ a qualified professional to furnish the specific service for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #22) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #22 was referred to neurology (nervous system specialist), rheumatology (autoimmune diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, and arthritis specialist), pulmonology (lung specialist), and ophthalmology (eye specialist) and the facility did not follow up on these referrals in a timely manner.Findings include: The facility policy Outside Appointments and Consultations, revised 01/2026, documented the facility would ensure all residents received timely, appropriate, and coordinated care when attending outside appointments or consultations. The facility maintained accountability for continuity of care, resident safety, communication, and follow-up in accordance with state and federal regulations. The physician ordered the consultation and scheduled in collaboration with the resident, responsible party, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of their personal and medical information for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #2) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #2 had a binder located in a holder outside their room, accessible to all, containing staff entries about the resident's personal care. Findings include: The undated facility policy Resident Rights, documented residents had the right to privacy and confidentiality of records. The facility policy Quality of Life – Dignity, revised 08/2025, documented staff should maintain an environment in which confidential clinical information was protected, for example: signs indicating the resident clinical status or care needs should not be openly posted in the resident's room unless specifically requested by the resident or family member. Resident #2 had diagnoses including depression. The 12/27/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had intact cognition; rejected care one (1)- three (3) of seven (7) days; and did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews (Intake #s 2714848 and 2729682) the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for one (1) of three (3) Residents (Resident #3) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #3 had facial hair and shaving was not offered. Findings include: The facility policy Activities of Daily Living, supported, revised 04/2025, documented appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently, with the consent of the resident in accordance with their plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene: (bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care).Resident #3 had diagnoses including quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs) and depression. The 11/21/2025 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. The Comprehensive Care Plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is fed by enteral means (feeding tube) receives the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for one (1) of one (1) resident (Resident #37) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #37's enteral feeding formula, water flush containers, and tubing were not dated and timed. Findings include: The facility policy Enteral Nutrition, revised 08/2025, did include directions for administering tube feeding and hang life of enteral formulas. Resident #37 had diagnoses including esophageal cancer and gastrostomy (feeding tube) status. The 02/24/2026 Minimum Data Set assessment documented the resident had moderately impaired cognition and required enteral feeding. The Comprehensive Care Plan revised 04/01/2026 documented the resident was at risk for malnutrition related to history of protein calorie malnutrition, schizophrenia, anxiety and depression, history of underweight body mass index, edentulous (having no natural teeth), history of sporadic meal intakes,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the facility failed to ensure that residents who required dialysis services (filtration of blood when the kidneys do not work) received such services consistent with professional standards of practice for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #10) reviewed. Specifically, Resident #10 received hemodialysis treatments at a community-based dialysis center and did not have on-going assessments and oversight before and after dialysis treatments or consistent documented evidence of communication with the dialysis center. Findings include: The facility policy Dialysis, revised 7/2008, documented residents that received dialysis received interventions to maintain their highest level of functioning. Every dialysis resident had a comprehensive care plan regarding their need for dialysis and residents going out of the building for hemodialysis will take communication sheets allowing for ease of communication between the facilities.Resident #10 had diagnoses including end stage kidney disease with dependence on dialysis. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interviews during abbreviated survey (NY00317123), the facility did not ensure residents were free from abuse and failed to protect residents from further abuse for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #2 and 4) reviewed, and 6 unidentified residents. Specifically, Resident #1 was cognitively impaired with a history of sexually inappropriate behaviors and there were no documented interventions to address the resident's ongoing behaviors or to protect other residents from abuse. Resident #2, a cognitively impaired resident, was touched on their breast by Resident #1. Two weeks later, Resident #2 was documented as being touched inappropriately by Resident #1. There was no documented evidence Resident #2 was assessed timely, no evidence the provider and the resident's family were notified timely and interventions to protect Resident #2 and other vulnerable residents were not effective to prevent recurrence. Resident #4, a cognitively impaired resident had their back and buttocks rubbed by Resident #1. Subsequently, Resident #1 kissed unidentified residents on two…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during abbreviated survey (NY00317123), the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse and neglect were thoroughly investigated for 3 of 4 residents (Resident #1, #3, and #4) reviewed and for an additional 6 unidentified residents. Specifically, facility investigations did not identify concerns related to: -Resident #2, a cognitively impaired resident, was touched on their breast by Resident #1. Two weeks later, Resident #2 was documented as having Resident #1 rub their genitals against them. There was no documented evidence Resident #2 was assessed timely, no evidence the provider and the resident's family were notified timely and interventions to protect Resident #2 and other vulnerable residents were not implemented timely. - Resident #4, a cognitively impaired resident had their back and buttocks rubbed by Resident #1. - Resident #1 had sexually inappropriate behaviors towards unidentified residents documented in their medical record on 6 occasions (including kissing 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey (NY00357986), the facility did not ensure food related equipment functioned in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the main kitchen. Specifically, the water temperatures of the wash and rinse sinks in the three bay sink system (a 3-step process used to manually wash, rinse, and sanitize dishware) were not hot and less than 110 degrees Fahrenheit. Findings include: The facility policy, Sanitization, revised 5/2024, documented the food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. All equipment, food contact surfaces, and utensils shall be washed to remove or completely loosen soil by using the manual or mechanical means necessary and sanitized using hot water and/or chemical sanitizing solutions. Sanitizing of utensils should be accomplished by contact with sanitizing solution or immersion for 30 seconds in hot (at least 171 degree Fahrenheit) water. The Pot and Pan Cleaning and Sanitizing Procedures, located on the wall above the three bay sinks…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-03 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview during the recertification survey conducted 4/29/2024-5/3/2024 the facility did not ensure certified nurse aide performance reviews were completed once every 12 months for 2 of 3 certified nurse aides (certified nurse aides #9 and #10) reviewed. Specifically, certified nurse aides #9 and #10 did not have performance reviews documented at least once every 12 months. Findings included: The facility In-Service Training Program, Nurse Aide, revised October 2017, documented the facility would complete a performance review of certified nurse aides at least once every 12 months. Records would be filed in the employee's personnel file or would be maintained by the department supervisor. During a review of personnel files for certified nurse aides #9 and #10 there was no documented evidence of performance reviews completed at least once every 12 months. During an interview on 5/2/2024 at 10:15 AM, the Corporate Director of Nursing stated the certified nurse aide personnel files containing annual performance reviews were kept in the Human Resources office.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to THE MAYER FAMILY — 11 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $526K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY