Advanced Center For Nursing & Rehabilitation
169 Davenport Avenue, New Haven, CT 06519 · For profit - Corporation · 226 certified beds · (203) 789-1650 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (72) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $72,450 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-19)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
- about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 1 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 1 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.7% | 18.0% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.4% | 6.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.2% | 0.7% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.5% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 33.6% | 22.3% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.1% | 16.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.8% | 17.6% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 4.0% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.7% | 24.7% | 21.2% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.9% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 33.1% | 69.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 27.8% | 24.3% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.4% | 10.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 4.52 | 2.06 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.41 | 1.46 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 68 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.7%CMS range 49.1–69.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.3–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 52.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 50.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.7–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.31 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 226 beds and averages 197.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 28 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.449 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.07 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
72 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for supplemental oxygen, the facility failed to assess the resident and notify the provider when Resident #2 experienced Shortness of Breath (SOB) related to the facility's lack of oxygen concentrators and emergency tank supplies. The facility failed to ensure continuous, functioning supplemental oxygen and failed to provide timely, appropriate intervention for Resident #2's acute respiratory distress, resulting in Resident #2's condition deteriorating to acute respiratory arrest, ultimately leading to death. The failures resulted in the finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (excess carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A physician's order dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #2 and Resident #14) reviewed for neglect, the facility failed to ensure nail care was performed for a dependent resident (Resident #2) with a contracted hand, failed to implement effective interventions when the resident resisted care, and failed to report ongoing care concerns to the provider for further evaluation, resulting in overgrown, unkempt fingernails and a left fourth finger infection requiring surgical intervention (incision and drainage); and failed to ensure bathing care was provided for a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #14) and failed to identify, report, and address ongoing gaps in care delivery, resulting in poor hygiene requiring hand soaks to remove fecal matter from underneath the fingernails. The findings included:1.Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in February of 2022 with diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to notify the provider at the time Resident #2 reported shortness of breath until three (3) hours later. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (excess carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A physician's order dated [DATE] directed to administer continuous oxygen at three (3) liters per minute via nasal cannula for a diagnosis of COPD. The order noted the oxygen may be removed for brief periods. Interventions per the Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] directed to provide supplemental oxygen per physician's order, monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to the provider, and to check oxygen saturation levels as needed and report abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed follow the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance for scheduled testing of the water, obtain the appropriate amount of water samples to be tested, and replace the sink filters every ninety (90) days according to the manufacturer's guidance after a resident had tested positive for legionella at the hospital. The findings include:On [DATE], the facility was notified that a resident (Resident #3) had tested positive for legionella while admitted to the hospital. On [DATE] at 2:23 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) communicated with the Connecticut Department of Public Health's epidemiologist (Person #1) and was given guidance regarding the schedule of environmental water sample testing: the CDC guidance of collecting samples for culture was at two (2) week intervals for three (3) months and if legionella was not detected during that time, then cultures would be collected monthly for another three (3) months. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — patternProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policy, and interviews for three (3) of three (3) residents (Residents #2, #14, and #18) reviewed for significant weight loss, the facility failed to ensure adequate nutritional monitoring and intervention to prevent significant weight loss by failing to obtain weights per policy and physician orders, failing to obtain timely re-weights following significant changes, and failing to consistently document and evaluate meal intake to guide care resulting in an inability to identify and respond to nutritional decline and contributed to continued weight loss, and for Resident #14, malnutrition. The findings include:1. Resident #14's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances and adult failure to thrive.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3), required setup assistance for eating and was independent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and facility documentation/policy for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a leave of absence (LOA), the facility failed to update the Resident Care Plan (RCP) to include directives for the management of the residents independent LOA in accordance with facility policy and for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #2) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to implement interventions related to physician notification for refusal of contracture care. The findings included:Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 and had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic osteomyelitis of the right foot and ankle, and cellulitis of the right lower limb.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15) and utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility.The RCP dated 10/10/25 identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation/policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #2 and Resident #14) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance with personal hygiene, including hand and nail care for a dependent resident with a contracted hand (Resident #2), and bathing care for a cognitively impaired resident (Resident #14), and failed to implement effective interventions when care was resisted, resulting in poor hygiene, including overgrown, unkempt fingernails with compromised skin integrity and the need for hand soaks to remove fecal matter from underneath the fingernails. The findings included:1.Resident #2 was admitted to the facility in February of 2022 with diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic autonomic neuropathy, contracture of the left hand, and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of three (3) residents (Residents #2 and #14) reviewed for bathing and grooming, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to reflect the provision of required hygiene care, including weekly showers and/or bed baths, resulting in an inability to verify care delivery. The findings include:1. Resident #2's diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive, type II diabetes mellitus and stage 3 pressure ulcer (full thickness skin loss that extends through the skin into deeper tissue and fat but does not reach muscle, tendon or bone). The significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9), required partial assistance with eating, substantial assistance with bed mobility and was dependent on staff for transfers.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility policies and interviews for three (3) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents #3, #4 and #5) who required supplemental oxygen use via a concentrator, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing was changed every seven (7) days per facility policy. The findings include:1. Resident 3's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #3 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. A physician's order dated 9/19/22 directed to administer oxygen via a nasal cannula or non-rebreather at two (2) to three (3) liters per minute every shift as needed for Shortness of Breath (SOB) to maintain an oxygen saturation level greater than 92 percent and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-10-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, review of facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #3) reviewed for supplemental oxygen usage, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #3's need for oxygen use. The findings include:Resident #3's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body tissues), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and anxiety disorder. A physician's order dated 9/19/22 directed to administer oxygen via a nasal cannula or non-rebreather at two (2) to three (3) liters per minute every shift as needed for Shortness of Breath (SOB) to maintain an oxygen saturation level greater than 92 percent. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of fifteen (15) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #3 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time, was independent with activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IIDR2025-10-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) reviewed for supplemental oxygen, the facility failed to assess the resident when staff reported Resident #2 was experiencing shortness of breath. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypercapnia (excess carbon dioxide in the bloodstream), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) and dependence on supplemental oxygen. A physician's order dated [DATE] directed to administer continuous oxygen at three (3) liters per minute via nasal cannula for a diagnosis of COPD. The order noted the oxygen may be removed for brief periods. Interventions per the Resident Care Plan dated [DATE] directed to provide supplemental oxygen per physician's order, monitor for signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and report to the provider, and to check oxygen saturation levels as needed and report abnormal values to the provider.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record reviews, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart located in the hallway was locked and medication was secured to prevent unauthorized access. The findings include:Observations on the D1 unit on 9/25/25 at 10:17 AM identified a medication cart in the hallway to the left of the nurse's station, pushed up against the left side of the hall, about one-third of the way down. The medication cart was noted to be unlocked with the cart keys located on the top of the cart, as well as an open bottle of docusate sodium (stool softener), a glucometer, a bottle of glucometer test strips, five (5) empty blister packs of medication, six (6) pre-poured cups of water without covers, an orange cover to an insulin syringe and a cell phone. Upon further observations a resident was noted to walk by the cart and the charge nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2, was noted to emerge from a resident's room, in which the door had been closed at 10:19 AM. Interview and observations of the medication cart with LPN #2 on 9/25/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for two (2) of twenty-one (21) randomly selected residents (Residents #5 and #11), the facility failed to ensure blood work was obtained per the physician's order. The findings include:1. Resident #5's diagnoses included pneumonia, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in body tissues), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), anemia (low levels of healthy red blood cells to carry oxygen throughout the body), generalized edema (severe buildup of fluid in the tissues of several parts of the body) and hypocalcemia (low calcium levels in the blood). A physician's order dated 9/10/25 directed on 9/12/25 to obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel (BMP) and a Complete Blood Count (CBC) with differential. Review of Resident #5's clinical record failed to identify the blood work was obtained or Resident #5 had refused the blood work. A new physician's order dated 9/25/25 directed to obtain a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) and a CBC with differential on 9/26/25 and there were no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for two (2) of seven (7) sampled residents (Residents #6 and #7) who required supplemental oxygen usage via a concentrator, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen concentrators were inspected annually for function and safety. The findings include:1. Resident #6's diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), Shortness of Breath (SOB) and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven (7) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily life. A physician's order for 8/1/25 through 9/26/25 directed to administer oxygen via nasal cannula at two (2) liters per minute every shift to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 91 percent (%) and to prevent hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in the body's tissues).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Residents #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the physician/APRN was notified timely when medications were not administered in accordance with orders, and for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #14 and Resident #16) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician/APRN timely when medications were not available for administration in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: The findings include:Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Residents #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the physician/APRN was notified timely when medications were not administered in accordance with orders, and for two (2) of three (3) residents (Resident #14 and Resident #16) reviewed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for three sampled residents (Residents #1, #12, and #13) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from misappropriate of resident property. The findings include:Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for three sampled residents (Residents #1, #12, and #13) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from misappropriate of resident property. The findings include:A. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, opioid dependance, osteomyelitis of the vertebra (back bone infection), and bacteremia (blood infection). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/21/2025 identified Resident #1 had pain. Interventions directed to administer pain medication as ordered. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for three sampled residents (Residents #1, 12, and 13) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards to include controls of narcotic medications as per facility policy. The findings include:Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for three sampled residents (Residents #1, 12, and 13) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards to include controls of narcotic medications as per facility policy. The findings include: Although requested, the facility was unable to provide the facility monthly or bi-monthly audits of controlled substances as per facility policy for June or July 2025 and indicated any audits could not be located at time of survey. Interview and documentation review with the DON on 8/13/2025 at 10:13 AM identified that staff signed Hydromorphone medication out on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for three of six residents (Residents #1, Resident #14 and Resident #16) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for three of six residents (Residents #1, Resident #14 and Resident #16) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included chronic pain syndrome, opioid dependance, osteomyelitis of the vertebra (back bone infection), and bacteremia (blood infection). A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was discharged on Cefazolin (antibiotic) two (2) grams (gms) per fifty (50)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse or neglect, the facility failed to ensure the resident was free from physical abuse. The findings include: A. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included encephalopathy, heart failure and depression. ] A significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severe cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7), required maximal assistance for rolling side to side and was dependent for transfer and personal hygiene. A resident care plan (RCP) dated 3/22/2025 identified Resident #2 had major depression. The RCP directed supportive counseling and individual psychotherapy. B. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia and hypertension. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had severe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1), reviewed for abuse or neglect, the facility failed to obtain vital signs according to provider order for a resident who required monitoring after a newly discontinued medication. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, functional quadriplegia (loss of function of the four limbs and torso), neurogenic bladder (lack of bladder control) and a pressure ulcer of the right buttock. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderate cognitive impairment (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9) and was dependent for bed mobility, transfer, and personal care. An APRN progress note dated 4/28/2025 identified Resident #1 was seen for chronic medical problems. Assessment and plan identified Resident #1 had intermittent hypotension with improved anemia. Blood pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure that the medical provider was notified timely of a change in condition. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 3 was alert and oriented (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14), and was independent with mobility and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/19/2023 identified Resident #3 had altered respiratory status due to COPD. The RCP directed to assess for changed in respiratory status and advise MD and administer oxygen as ordered. A nursing note dated 11/21/2023 at 3:13 PM identified that Resident #1 was alert and responsive, and was observed with shortness of breath (SOB) and oxygen (02) saturation was 88 percent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised timely after a fall. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted with diagnoses that included traumatic brain hemorrhage and Schizophrenia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and assistance for transfers into a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/3/2023 identified Resident #2 was at risk for falls due to a history of falls and cognitive impairment. Interventions directed to remind Resident to use the call bell to request assistance before getting out of bed and to toilet promptly. A facility incident report dated 5/31/2023 at 10:50 AM identified Resident #2 had an unwitnessed fall and was observed on the floor by housekeeping. Resident #2 had no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure neurological assessments were completed timely after an unwitnessed fall in accordance with facility Monitoring guidelines. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted with diagnoses that included traumatic brain hemorrhage and Schizophrenia. An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance for bed mobility and assistance for transfers into a wheelchair. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 5/3/2023 identified Resident #2 was at risk for falls due to a history of falls and cognitive impairment. Interventions directed to remind Resident to use the call bell to request assistance before getting out of bed and to toilet promptly. A facility incident report dated 5/31/2023 at 10:50 AM identified Resident #2 had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews with one of three residents (Resident #3) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include timely documentation of a medical evaluation. The findings include: Resident #3 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and chronic obstructive respiratory disease (COPD). A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 3 was alert and oriented (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14), and was independent with mobility and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/19/2023 identified Resident #3 had altered respiratory status due to COPD. The RCP directed to assess for changed in respiratory status and advise MD and administer oxygen as ordered. A nursing note dated 11/21/2023 at 3:13 PM identified that Resident #1 was alert and responsive, and was observed with shortness of breath (SOB) and oxygen (02)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the physician regarding the resident not receiving his/her medication for two (2) days. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included dementia, prostate cancer, schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, seizures, and encephalopathy. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of fifteen (3/15), indicative of severely impaired cognition and was dependent with ADLs (activities of daily living). Physician order dated 8/27/2024 directed to administer Abiraterone (antineoplastic) 1000 milligrams (mg) every day at 8:30 PM. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 10/10/2024 identified Resident #2 had an alteration in health maintenance related to physical and psychological conditions. Interventions directed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication provided by the family for facility staff to administer was verified/confirmed to be the drug ordered by the physician and failed to ensure the contents of each container have been verified by a licensed pharmacist in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included dementia, prostate cancer, schizophrenia, diabetes mellitus, seizures, and encephalopathy. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of fifteen (3/15), indicative of severely impaired cognition and was dependent with ADLs (activities of daily living). Physician order dated 8/27/2024 directed to administer Abiraterone (antineoplastic) 1000 milligrams (mg) every day at 8:30 PM. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure the treatment plans recommended by the wound care physician were entered into the clinical record and implemented. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included pressure ulcer, diabetes mellitus, malnutrition, peripheral vascular disease, and dementia. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/12/25 identified a potential for skin impairment related to poor physical condition. Interventions directed to apply barrier cream, turn and reposition every two (2) hours, and weekly skin checks. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of three (3) out of fifteen (15) indicating Resident #1 rarely or never made decisions regarding tasks of daily living, had an altered level of consciousness, required staff assistance for personal care and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for resident rights, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was treated with dignity and respect. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pulmonary edema, depression, anxiety and chronic pain. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating Resident #1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time and received an antidepressant medication. The Resident Care Plan dated 1/16/25 identified Resident #1 exhibited behavioral symptoms of being verbally and physically abusive, refusal of care, delusions, hallucinations, aggression, psychiatric conditions, and was a risk of injury to self or others. Interventions directed to approach in a calm and consistent manner, for refusals of care re-approach resident at another time, monitor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical reviews, observations, review of policy and interviews for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for smoking (Resident #21), the facility failed to provide a safe smoking environment and for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #187) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff reported resident behavior that presented as a fire hazard. The findings included: 1. Resident 21's diagnoses included dementia and schizophrenia. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #21 as cognitively intact and required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and substantial/maximal assistance for lower body dressing. The Facility Smoker list documentation dated 1/10/2025 identified Resident #21 as a smoker. Observation on 1/27/202 from 1:31 PM to 1:55 PM during the facility smoking break identified the following: a.There were 12 residents participating in the smoking break. Resident #21 was observed sitting in his/her wheelchair near the edge of the tent in the smoking patio. Resident #21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0712 — patternEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, reviews of facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #166), reviewed for physician visits, the facility failed to ensure that physician visits were completed timely. The findings include: Resident #166 was admitted on [DATE]. The residents' diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, and atrial fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm). The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #166 was cognitively intact and had clear speech. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #166's primary medical condition category as medically complex conditions. On 1/16/2025 at 12:49 PM an interview with Resident #166 identified the resident would like to see his/her primary care physician (PCP) to coordinate his/her care. Resident #166 indicated she/he has seen five different APRN's while at the facility but has not seen a Medical Doctor (MD). A review of the clinical record from 6/4/2022 through 1/16/2025 identified the last note by a physician (MD) was an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 28 of 28 sampled residents (Resident #105, #89, #151, #183, #19, #474, #113, #475, #190,# 476, #96, #163, #148, #133, #21, #100,# 200, #199, #177, #479, #185, #182, #188, #143, #198, #147, #193,# 211) reviewed for medication storage, the facility failed to develop and implement policies for the recordkeeping of individual use and chain of custody controlled substances, failed to maintain an unbroken chain of custody for controlled medications once received and distributed to nursing unit(s) and failed to document inventory across shifts and failed to maintain an accurate disposition log for the destruction and return of unused controlled medication. The findings included: 1 a Resident #143's diagnosis includes Opioid dependence. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident # 143 had intact cognition and required set up assist with eating and independent with dressing. The care plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on tour of the dietary department and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at an appropriate temperature to maintain palpable taste. The findings include: A tour of the dietary department between 1/16/25 through 1/27/25 with the Food Service Director identified below: Observation of the tray line on 1/22/25 at 7 :00 AM identified the eggs temperature for scrambled eggs at 196 degrees Fahrenheit and hot cereal was at 195 degrees Fahrenheit. During the plating, the scrambled eggs were placed in a heating tray. Observation on 1/22/25 at 7:40 AM of the plating for the last (4th) food chart identified the food chart leaving the kitchen at 8:19AM. Observation on 1/22/25 at 8:23 AM of food cart arrival to third floor, unit D3. Observation on 1/22/25 at 8: 36AM of the food cart identified the door was left open. Observation on 1/22/25 at 8:48AM of last meal tray leaving the kitchen in a food cart identified during a test tray scrambled eggs were tempted at 88.2 degrees and Oatmeal was 131.2 degrees. An interview with the Food Service Director on 1/22/25 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility Infection Control Program, facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff conducted and maintained documentation of yearly ongoing review of antibiotic use within the facility based on Antibiotic stewardship guidelines. The findings included: On 1/22/2025 9:30 AM and interview and review of facility documents with LPN # 9, the Infection Preventionist (IP) in the role at the facility for last 2 months identified no evidence of ongoing surveillance of infections only a binder containing the past two years 2023 and 2024 of the monthly list of antibiotics used in the facility for each resident which was provided by the pharmacy to nursing. Although the IP, LPN #9 provided blank McGeer's forms to use during the antibiotic surveillance process, s/he identified she/he had not utilized them the form yet. LPN #1 identified she/had state infection control training which was minimal training and indicates she/he had been pulled away frequently from Infection Control duties to provide resident care for the shift when licensed nurses called…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for 1 of 5 for (Resident # 70), reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure staff interacted with the resident respectfully. The findings includes: Resident #70's diagnosis included Chronic Congestive Heart Failure (CHF), back pain, diabetes mellitus, anxiety and depression. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #70 as cognitively intact, used a walker, was independent with toileting hygiene and had occasional pain that interfered with sleep and day-to-day activities. The care plan dated 1/7/2025 for Resident #70 requires assistance with toileting using a wheeled walker and has a history of falls. An intervention is directed to call for assistance when needed. On 1/16/2024 Resident #70 reported to a surveyor on 1/15/2025 that urine was on the bedside floor, and she/he was attempting to clean the urine up with linens on the floor but instead called staff for assistance. Nurse Aide (NA #8)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1of 3 residents (Resident # 173) reviewed for personal property, the facility failed to ensure the resident's personal medication was not missing and for 2 of 2 residents ( Residents # 164 and # 181) reviewed for environment, the facility failed to ensure a shared room had a functioning bathroom sink and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #118) reviewed for environment, the facility failed to ensure resident furniture was maintained and in proper working order. The findings included: 1.Resident #173 's diagnoses included carcinoma in situ of prostate, secondary malignant neoplasm of genital organs and Type 2 diabetes mellitus. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #173 as cognitively intact and requires set up for eating. The resident is independent with bed mobility and toilet transfers. The care plan dated 12/10/24 identified Resident #173 has a diagnosis of cancer and noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #144) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed implement policies to ensure the protection residents following an allegation of abuse and for (Resident # 214), the facility failed to timely followed up on Resident # 214 concerns regarding Resident # 1's physical and verbal abuse toward staff to rule out Resident # 1 was not a danger to self and others. The findings include: 1. Resident #144's diagnoses included history of dysuria (painful urination )and bipolar disorder. The annual MDS assessment 10/1/24 identified Resident #144 as cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine and required one person assist with ambulation and toileting needs. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/30/24 identified Resident #144 had a concern related to ADL function. Interventions included providing assist of one with transfers and toileting. A Reportable Event Summary dated 1/16/25 identified Resident #144 alleged the nurse, LPN #6 offered Tylenol and stated s/he could…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #111) reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure staff developed a care plan reflecting the needs of a resident receiving dialysis care and for1 of 2 residents (Resident # 109), reviewed for communication- Sensory, the facility failed to ensure that the care plan reflected the residents' sensory needs. The findings included: 1. Resident #111's diagnosis includes end stage renal disease with dependence on renal dialysis. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #111 as cognitively intact. The care plan dated 12/20/2024 for Resident was at increased risk for alterations in nutritional status secondary to renal dialysis. Interventions included providing a renal diet and supplements. An interview and record review with RN #1 (Nursing Supervisor) on 1/25/2025 at identified there was no specific care plan related to the resident's dialysis access site…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, policy the facility and interviews for 2 of 4 residents ( Resident # 104) reviewed for urinary retention, the facility failed to revised the care plan after the resident returned from an inpatient stay and for 1 of 1 resident ( Resident # 207)reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure staff revised the residents a resident's care plan to reflect resident's choice regarding bathroom preferences . The findings included: 1.Resident #104 's diagnoses included urinary retention, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 as cognitively intact and required maximum assistance with personal hygiene, toileting and bathing. A physician's order dated 12/17/24 directed to begin voiding trials in 5 days of discharge as a Foley catheter was in placed while in the hospital. A nurse's note dated 12/17/24 at 10:37 PM identified Resident # 104 returned from the hospital with a diagnosis of urinary retention. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical review, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for of 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #144) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to offer Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care to a resident who required toileting assist. The findings include: Resident #144 's diagnoses included the history of dysuria (painful urination) and bipolar disorder. The annual MDS assessment 10/1/24 identified Resident #144 as cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine and required one person assist with ambulation and toileting needs. The RCP dated 12/30/24 identified Resident #144 had a concern related to ADL function. Interventions included providing assist of one with transfers and toileting. The Point of Care History dated 1/15/24 at 5:41 AM during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM identified Resident #144 was last provided incontinent care on 1/15/25 at 8:44 PM and noted incontinent care and toileting needs 'Did not occur' during the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift. An interview with Resident #144 on 1/16/25 (no time) identified s/he was last provided incontinent care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documents, policy review and interviews for 1 of 2 residents ( Resident # 144) reviewed for pain, the facility failed to ensure a a resident with reports of increasing pain was reported/assessed by an Registered Nurse and for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #324), reviewed for dignity, the facility failed to ensure a follow-up appointment with a specialist provider was provided as scheduled . The findings included: 1. Resident #144's diagnosest included history of dysuria (painful urination) and bipolar disorder. The annual MDS assessment 10/1/24 identified Resident #144 was cognitively intact, frequently incontinent of urine and required one person assist bed mobility and ambulation. The RCP dated 12/30/24 identified Resident #144 had a positive Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for a serious mental illness, refused medications and exhibited aggression at times. Interventions included providing education on the importance of taking medications and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy and documentation for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 104) reviewed for urinary retention, the facility failed to follow the resident's discharge summary physician's order for urinary retention and for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Bowel and Bladder Incontinence (Resident #207), the facility failed to assess a resident with frequent incontinence for participation in a bowel and bladder re-training program. The findings included: 1.Resident #104 's diagnoses included urinary retention, and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #104 as cognitively intact and required maximum assistance with personal hygiene, toileting and bathing. A nurse's note dated 12/17/24 at 10:37 PM identified Resident # 104 returned from the hospital with a diagnosis of urinary retention. A physician's order dated 1/13/25 directed to perform a bladder scan every 6 hours while awake if possible and to conduct intermittent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy review and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #105) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure staff obtained a readmission weight timely and obtained re-weights for a resident at nutritional risk. The findings include: Resident #105's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus and abnormal weight loss. Resident #105's weight on 9/2/2024 was 120.3 pounds. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #105 was cognitively intact had no or no known weight loss and the resident weighed 120 Pounds. The readmission Quarterly Nutritional Assessment indicated Resident #105 was readmitted from the hospital on 9/11/2024. The readmission weight was still pending but the hospital weight was 125 pounds with weights stable for 3 months and Resident #105 remained at nutritional risk. Resident #105's weight on 9/30/2024(14 days after readmission) was 125.4 pounds (a 5.1-pound weight gain since 9/2/2024). Resident #105's weight…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 or 2 residents (Resident #78) reviewed for specialized treatment, the facility failed to ensure respiratory equipment was in working condition. The findings include: Resident #78 's diagnoses included Malignant Neoplasm of the Larynx, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pulmonary hypertension. The Resident Care Plan dated 4/6/24 identified resident had an alteration in respiratory status. Interventions included to assess for changes in respiratory status and suction as needed. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #78 was cognitively intact and required maximum assistance with toileting, bathing, and supervision with personal hygiene. A physician's order dated 12/27/24 directed to clean and suction stoma/laryngectomy tube several times per day and to use saline irrigations to loosen any mucous. If patient is still having trouble breathing, remove the laryngectomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility policy and interviews for 5 of 6 residents ( Residents #14, #39, #84, #111 and #424) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to ensure staff consistently monitored vital signs, the resident's hemodialysis access sites and follow facility policy. The findings included. 1. Resident #14's diagnosis includes diabetic chronic kidney disease. A physician's order dated 9/3/2024 directed for Resident #14 to go to specialized treatment center 3 times per week due to renal failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicted Resident #14 was cognitively intact and had received dialysis. The care plan dated 11/29/2024 indicated Resident #14 was at risk for complications related to renal function requiring dialysis. Interventions included checking hemodialysis access site for signs of bleeding, infection or abnormality, to check access bruit and thrill daily and to monitor vital signs. An interview clinical record review and review of facility policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, facility policy review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff followed correct infection control practices for a resident ( Resident #86) requiring droplet and contact precautions and failed to ensure staff followed appropriate infection control practices when a resident bathroom sink ( Resident #164 and #181) was out of service. The findings included: 1. On 01/21/25 at 12:11 PM observation identified NA # 4 entering Resident #86's room wearing an isolation gown, gloves, and face shield over a regular face mask. Signage outside the door indicated the need for contact and droplet precautions and a cart with Person Protective Equipment ( PPE) including N95 masks was located just outside the doorway. Further observations identified after NA #4 doffed the gown into the trash in the room along with the gloves and carried the face shield to the sink at the nurse's station, washed hands and place the face shield in another location behind the nursing station. An interview with NA #4 on 1/21/2025 at 12:15 PM indicated s/he should have worn, and N-95…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-26 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to notify the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) timely of missed anti-seizure medication. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included conversion disorder (a mental health disorder that affects how the brain works) with seizures/convulsions and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/27/24 identified that Resident #1 requires assistance with Activity of Daily Living (ADLs) with interventions that included providing assistance to the resident as needed. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A physician's order dated 7/26/24 directed to administer Banzel 400 milligrams (mg) ( a anti-seizure medication), give four (4) tablets twice daily at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for medication errors the facility failed to ensure that a resident received an anti-seizure medication as ordered by the physician. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included conversion disorder (a mental health disorder that affects how the brain works) with seizures or convulsions and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/27/24 identified that Resident #1 requires assistance with ADLs. Interventions included providing ADL assistance to the resident as needed. The 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A physician's order dated 7/26/24 directed to administer Banzel 400 milligrams (mg), give four (4) tablets twice daily at 9:00 AM and 5:00 PM. Review of the electronic Medication Administration…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were reviewed for comprehensive care planning, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the resident's wound that was present on admission. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, quadriplegia, conversion disorder with seizures, and pneumonitis. The admission assessment dated [DATE] at 8:17 PM identified Resident #2 was non-verbal, responded to pain only, required a tracheostomy (an opening in the trachea to help air and oxygen reach the lungs by creating an opening from outside the neck), required a tube feed (a tube that goes directly into the stomach to provide nutrition) and had an open area on the right big toe. A physician's order dated 7/2/24 directed to cleanse the right great toe ulcer with normal saline, apply Puracol (a collagen dressing) followed by Aquacel (a wound dressing used to treat open wounds and surgical incisions) daily and as needed for soiling or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review and interviews for environmental review, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public and failed to ensure five of eleven resident's (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) rooms were free of bugs/roaches. The findings include: Review of the maintenance log for unit (A2) identified on 2/21/2023, roaches were observed in Resident #2 and #3's room, and on 4/1/2023, roaches were observed in Resident #2's and #3's room. Review of the Pest Service Inspection Report dated 6/12/2023 identified in the service comments, Resident #2, #3, #4, and #5's room was scheduled for a clean out and indicated Resident #2 and #3's room is the host room. Baseboard treatments were completed around the perimeter as a barrier treatment for insects and glue boards were placed in the bathrooms and in the kitchen. Observation of Resident #1's room on 10/2/2023 at 10:15 AM identified a foul-smelling odor upon entrance and the room had excessive clutter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to honor the resident's right by not providing assistance when requested. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and anxiety disorder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 02/29/23 identified Resident #2 requires a custom wheelchair with interventions that include the resident will utilize custom wheelchair provided by rehab that does not restrict the residents' movements or access to body. Nursing will transfer resident to the wheelchair per MD order. Rehab will screen for appropriateness as needed and ensure least restrictive device is used. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 made consistent and reasonable decisions regarding tasks of daily life and required extensive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents, (Resident #2), reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure the State Agency was notified of an allegation of abuse in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 made consistent and reasonable decisions regarding tasks of daily life and required extensive assistance with assist of one person for ADL's. A reportable event form and investigation dated 08/21/2023 without a specified timeframe, identified an email from Resident #2's responsible party (Person #1) regarding concerns of resident's care. Review of Person #1's email to Administrator #2 (Chief Operating Officer) dated 08/21/23 at 8:06 PM identified he/she would like to address the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered in accordance with physician orders. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included Factor V Leiden mutation, recurrent deep vein thrombosis, prothrombin gene mutation, and major depressive disorder. Physician orders dated 10/02/22 directed to administer Arixtra (fondaparinux) syringe; 7.5 mg/0.6 mL, subcutaneous, at 9:00 PM. Special instructions: Resident can self-administer with nursing present. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) form dated 07/03/2023 identified that Resident #1 made consistent and reasonable decisions regarding tasks of daily life and required supervision with set-up assistance for ADL's. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 07/26/2023 identified Resident #1 chooses to exercise right to personal preferences as evidenced by: Resident wishes to self-administer: Arixta with interventions that directed to allow the resident the right to express…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-04-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review and interviews for one observed resident (Resident #618), the facility failed to ensure the call bell was within reach. The findings include: Resident #618's diagnoses included Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) with Right hemiparesis (weakness or paralysis of one side of the body), history of falls, and dementia. Physician order dated 2/8/2022 directed to transfer Resident #618 with a mechanical lift and two (2) staff assistance. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 2/8/2022 identified Resident #618 was at risk for falls related to impaired mobility and poor safety awareness. Interventions directed to remind Resident #618 to use the call bell to request assistance. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #618 had moderate cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance with bed mobility, and had no limited range of motion of the upper extremities. Observation on 3/29/2022 at 12 PM identified Resident #618 was lying in bed and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #119) reviewed for a pressure ulcer (R#119), the facility failed to ensure the responsible party notified timely when a wound was identified. The findings include: Resident #119 had diagnoses that included a sacral pressure ulcer. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #119 had no pressure ulcer and used pressure relieving devices in his/her chair and bed. Review of the clinical record identified on 3/11/2022 staff observed a new facility acquired pressure ulcer on Resident #119's coccyx (stage 2). The wound measured 3.5 centimeters (cm) by 5.0 cm by 0.2 cm. Review of the clinical record failed to identify Resident #119's responsible party was notified of the new pressure ulcer identified on 3/11/2022. Nurse's note written by RN #3/ICN dated 3/14/2022 at 1:32 PM indicated Resident #119's responsible party (Person #1) was upset that the facility had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policy, facility documentation review, and interviews for on one of seven nursing unit shower rooms (S-3 Unit), reviewed for environment, the facility failed to ensure that the shower room was maintained in a clean, comfortable home-like manner and/or free from disrepair. The findings included: Observation of the shower room on the S-3 unit on 3/29/22 at 12:38 PM was identified as having cracked and missing tiles on the shower room floor. The wall-mounted heater had areas of rust and was dislodged from the wall on its upper right side. The walls surrounding the heater were noted to have rust-colored stains and the baseboard below the heater observed to have a black grime-like coating on the top edges. The ceiling in the shower room was observed with numerous rust-colored specks. Interview and observation of the S-3 shower room on 4/4/22 at 3:20 PM with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) identified the cracked and missing tiles should be replaced, the heater should be securely attached to the wall, and the rust-colored areas and black colored…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews for one of four residents reviewed for nutrition (Resident #119) and for one of two residents reviewed for indwelling catheters (Resident #119), the facility failed to ensure intake and output were monitored for a resident with a feeding tube and a Foley catheter. The findings included: Resident #119's diagnoses included hydronephrosis with renal and ureteral calculous obstruction, indwelling urinary catheter, left flank percutaneous nephrostomy drain, sepsis due to pseudomonas, adult failure to thrive, urinary retention, benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH) and gastric-tube insertion A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #119 had moderate cognitive impairment for decision-making skills, was always incontinent of urine and received 51% or more total calories via feeding tube. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/25/22 and on 3/27/22 identified an indwelling catheter and a feeding tube as the problems. Interventions…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for one of three residents reviewed for a pressure ulcer (Resident #119), the facility failed to ensure a wound treatment was provided in a clean manner with supplies placed on a clean surface. The findings included: Resident #119 had diagnoses that included a sacral pressure ulcer. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #119 had no pressure ulcer and used pressure relieving devices in his/her chair and bed. Review of the clinical record identified a facility acquired pressure ulcer was identified on 3/11/2022 on Resident #119's coccyx (stage 3). The Resident Care Plan (RCP) updated on 3/25/2022 identified a problem with a pressure ulcer. Interventions directed to provide wound treatments as ordered. Observation on 3/31/2022 at 11:20 AM of RN #3/ICN performing a wound treatment for Resident #119 identified RN #3 was observed setting up treatment supplies (i.e., 1-large sterile package of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for two of four residents (Resident #23 and #119), the facility failed to ensure a significant weight loss was addressed timely and the facility failed to ensure a reweight was obtained timely for a resident identified with a weight loss. The findings include: 1. Resident #23 was admitted with diagnoses that included dementia and diabetes. A quarterly Minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 had severe cognitive impairment and was independent with staff set up to eat. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 12/16/2021 identified Resident #23 had an increased risk for alteration in nutritional status. Interventions directed to provide supplements and to monitor weight trends. Review of Resident #23's weights identified the following: on 1/5 was 125.1 pounds (lbs), on 2/1 was 100.2 lbs which identified a loss of 24.9 lbs, and weight on 2/7/2022 was recorded as 103.7 lbs. A Dietician note dated 2/10/2022 at 11:58 AM identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, policy review, and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #616) reviewed for respiratory care, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed timely. The findings include: Resident #616 had diagnoses that included COPD. Physician's order dated 2/3/2022 directed oxygen at three (3) liters per minute via nasal cannula, and to change the oxygen tubing every week (on Saturday) during the 11-7 shift. The Resident Care Plan dated 2/3/2022 identified an alteration in respiratory status. Interventions directed to administer oxygen as ordered and maintain oxygen equipment at bedside. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #616 was alert and oriented, and required use of oxygen. Observation and interview with RN #1 on 4/1/2022 at 9:35 AM identified Resident #616 was wearing oxygen and the tubing was dated 3/20/2022 (13 days prior to the observation). RN #1 indicated the tubing should be changed weekly. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility policy and procedures and interviews for one of three residents reviewed for a pressure ulcer (R#119), the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was maintained in a complete and accurate manner to include accurate dates weekly skin checks were completed. The findings include: R#119's diagnoses included a sacral pressure ulcer, indwelling urinary catheter, left flank percutaneous nephrostomy drain, adult failure to thrive, and gastric-tube insertion. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #119 had moderate cognitive impairment and required staff assistance for ADLs. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated on 2/2/2022 identified a problem with pressure ulcer. Interventions directed to report any changes to skin to APRN/MD as necessary and perform weekly skin checks. Physician monthly orders for March 2022 directed body audits weekly on shower days, edit day based on shower days once a day on Wednesday, 7:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility policy review and interviews for one of two residents (Resident #188) reviewed for tracheostomy care, the facility failed to ensure supplies were stored appropriately and not stored on the floor, and for facility Infection Control Review, the facility failed to ensure facility infections were tracked and expired IV supplies were removed from staff access timely. The findings include: 1. Resident #188 had diagnoses that included a terminal condition of the larynx. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #188 was alert and oriented and had a tracheostomy. The RCP dated [DATE] identified an alteration in respiratory sttus. Interventions directed to assess for changes in respiratory status and maintain oxygen and suction equipment at bedside. Observation on [DATE] at 11:17 AM identified Resident #188's personal belongings including trach dressings and supplies were located inside and on top of a clear see-through plastic bag which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, clinical record review, and staff interview, for one of two residents in the survey sample reviewed for abuse (Resident #19), the facility failed to ensure a staff member reported an allegation of mistreatment in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #19's diagnoses include asthma, depression, anxiety, and post traumatic stress disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #19 had intact cognition and was independent with transfers and locomotion on and off the unit. A resident care plan dated 2/5/19 identified a problem related to behaviors as evidenced by: accusatory behaviors towards other residents, making false accusations, discussing her own personal health information, and sharing other resident's personal health information. Interventions included approach the resident in a calm, consistent manner, make eye contact, use the resident's name and explain the purpose upon approach, Psychiatric/psychological consult and follow-up…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #330) reviewed for anticoagulant medication, the facility failed to implement a care plan to reflect the use of an anticoagulant medication. The findings include: Resident #330 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses that included acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of right lower extremity. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified that hematology recommended six to twelve months of anticoagulation with apixaban which started on 9/17/19. Per hematology, a reassessment will be needed with the primary care physician as an outpatient at 6 months with repeat imaging to determine if anticoagulation should be stopped or continued based on risk/benefit assessment. A left lower extremity ultrasound dated 9/16/19 identified a non-occlusive thrombus again noted from the external iliac vein to the level of the popliteal vein, however, there…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for 1 of 5 residents, (Resident #126) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to follow physician's order for orthostatic blood pressure monitoring and/or for one sampled resident (Resident #330) reviewed for anticoagulant medication, the facility failed to implement a care plan to reflect the use of an anticoagulant medication. The findings include: a. Resident #126 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified psychosis and major depressive disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #126 had moderately impaired cognition, required extensive assistance of one for transfer, and required extensive assistance of two for toileting. The care plan review date of 4/10/19 identified psychotropic drug use. Interventions directed to attempt dose reduction to lowest possible therapeutic level and to monitor for adverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for one sampled resident (Resident #202) reviewed for enteral feeding, the facility failed to remove a gastrostomy tube (GT) feeding set up after 24 hours of use and/or failed to maintain complete daily intake measurements. The findings include: Resident #202's diagnoses included dysphagia. A physician's order dated 7/24/19 directed to change the enteral feeding bag daily on the 11:00 PM to 7:00 AM shift and provide 200 milliliters of free water flushes every six hours at 12:00 AM, 6:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 6:00 PM. The 30 day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #202 was severely cognitively impaired, required assistance with eating, and required a feeding tube. A physician's order dated 9/12/19 directed to administer a tube feed regimen for Glucerna 1.5 @ 50 ml per hour for 10 hours, turn on at 7:00 PM and off at 5:00 AM and change the bag daily on the 11-7 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, for one resident in the survey sample reviewed for laboratory services (Resident #97), the facility failed to ensure a laboratory test was completed to monitor a medication per physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #97's diagnoses included hypothyroidism, hypertension, and stroke. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] iidentified Resident #97 had no cognitive dysfunction, required extensive assist with transfers, and did not walk. A resident care plan dated 3/20/19 identified a problem with hypothroidism. Interventions included administer medications per physician (MD) order, evaluate/record/report effectiveness/adverse side effects, and monitor lab work per MD order. A laboratory report dated 5/2/19 indicated Resident # 97's TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) level was 7.88 (0.34 - 5.60). A Physician's order dated 5/7/19 directed to increase the Synthroid dose to 125 mcg and repeat the TSH level in 4 weeks. A laboratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-09-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a beard guard was utilized during food handling and/or failed to properly maintain temperatures in nourishment refrigerator. The findings include: a. During the walk through of kitchen with Director of Dietary Services on 9/23/19 at 9:35 AM, observation of the Head Cook, who had a full beard, in the kitchen preparation food area identified he/she was mixing a very large bowl of molasses type food substance (identified as BBQ sauce) in an uncovered bowl without the benefit of a beard guard protector. Interview with Head [NAME] at this time, identified that he/she knew to wear a beard guard, but that it was itching him/her so he/she removed it. Interview with Director of Dietary Services on 9/23/19 at 9:37 AM identified that the hair and beard guards are required for all personnel in the kitchen environment if they have facial hair and/or hair on head. Interview with Administrator on 9/23/19 at 10:45 AM identified that administration had repeated this message several times and stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documentation and policy for seven (7) of nine (9) residents (Resident #1, #3, #4, #7, #8, #9, and #13) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to provide timely notification to the ombudsman when residents were discharged and/or planned for discharge from the facility. The findings included:1.Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in October of 2025 and had diagnoses which included Type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer, chronic osteomyelitis of the right foot and ankle, and cellulitis of the right lower limb.A physician's order dated [DATE] identified an independent leave of absence (LOA) was granted.The LOA Notification Form dated [DATE] at 9:36 AM identified Resident #1 left the faciity on an LOA and planned to return at 11:00 AM on [DATE].A nurse's note by RN #1 on [DATE] at 1:53 PM identified he/she called Resident #1 and Resident #1 indicated he/she would return the following morning ([DATE]). RN #1 further indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2026-03-19 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #14) reviewed for significant weight loss, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's significant weight loss greater than ten (10) percent (%) in the last six (6) months at the time of the assessment. The findings include: Resident #14's diagnoses included vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances and adult failure to thrive.A weight of 122.0 pounds (lbs) was obtained on 5/13/25.The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had severely impaired cognition (Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3), required setup assistance for eating and was independent for bed mobility, transfers and ambulation.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/10/25 identified Resident #14 was at risk for malnutrition related to a history of adult failure to thrive, altered nutrition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of Resident Assessment during survey, review of facility documentation and interviews for 17 of 17 residents (Residents 84,90,195,197,11,40,62,173,79,24,68,100,120,192,80,194,64), the facility failed to ensure the residents Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment were transmitted timely to the state agency. The findings included: A review of Residents 84,90,195,197,11,40,62,173,79,24,68,100,120,192,80,194,64 MDS assessment submitted to the state agency for the period of 2023 through December 2024. A review MDS Coordinator (LPN) Report for the period of 2023 through December 2024 on 1/28/25 at 9:15 AM and again at 3:15 PM identified MDS assessment needs to be completed 7 dates from Assessment Reference Date (ARD) set date and then 7 days to sign and transmit from there. 15 days total from the set date to transmission. The MDS Coordinator also indicated she assumed her role in December 2024. and was aware that MDS assessment had not been submitted timely to the state agency. The MDS Coordinator also indicated that the administrator was aware of the late MDS transmission to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews, for 9 of 9 sampled residents (Residents #14, #20, #25, #28, #29, #32, #39, #42, and #46) reviewed for resident assessment, the facility failed to transmit the resident's quarterly and/or annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the state agency in a timely manner. The findings include: A review of the MDS transmission summary report dated 9/20/19 identified that the assessments of Resident #14, 20, 25, 28, 29, 32, 39, 42 and 46 were transmitted on on 9/20/19. It further was noted with the notation of: Record submitted late: The submission date is more than 14 days. Resident #14's quarterly MDS assessment had an assessment reference date (ARD) of 7/20/19. The MDS was transmitted on 9/20/19 (62 days later). Resident #20's quarterly MDS assessment had an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/12/19. The MDS was transmitted on 9/20/19 (39 days later). Resident #25's quarterly MDS assessment had an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/5/19. The MDS was transmitted on 9/20/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documentation, and interview, for 1 of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #198), the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete. The findings include: a. Resident #198 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included psychosis, major depressive disorder, and Marfan's syndrome. Physician's order dated 7/23/19 identified to perform orthostatic blood pressure weekly x 4 weeks. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #198 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene. Review of vital sign information and nurse's notes with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7 for Resident #198 failed to reflect that orthostatic blood pressures were completed per physician's order. Subsequent to surveyor inquiry, the Infection Control Nurse handed in Nurse Aide (NA) worksheets, which are not part of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$72,450 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $72,450 — penalty dated 2026-03-19
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ESSENTIAL HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.5 | -1.5 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 4.0 | -1.0 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEWIRTZ, ESTHER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 15% | since 08/01/2016 |
| LANDA, JOSEPH | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 13% | since 06/13/2025 |
| LANDA, JOSHUA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 13% | since 06/13/2025 |
| LANDA, SARI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 06/13/2025 |
| SALAMON, MENAJEM | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 40% | since 06/13/2025 |
| SALAMON, MORDEJAI | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 06/13/2025 |
| GEWIRTZ, JONATHAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 10/01/2016 |
| PASCALE, JACLYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/23/2025 |
| ZAKI, SHAHZAD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| BURG & WEINGARTEN, CPA, PC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2023 |
| ZELLA HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $6.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in CT
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075348. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.