No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

New Haven Center For Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC

181 Clifton Street, New Haven, CT 06513 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 150 certified beds · (203) 907-3550 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseResident-funds citations (F0565, F0568)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$61,814 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (28% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Aug 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $61,814 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-29)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
50 Grand Ave
Pharmacy
339 Eastern St · (203) 467-2916 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
121 Grand Ave · (203) 777-2201 · Call to confirm hours
Park
899 Quinnipiac Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%18.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%6.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms61.2%22.3%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%3.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened14.8%16.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.8%17.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.3%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.3%4.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.8%24.7%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.9%17.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication8.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine41.1%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.3%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.5%10.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days4.532.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.431.461.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.0–16.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified91.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 2.8–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.80
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.43
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.04
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
27.6%
Total nursing turnover
58.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 124.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.04 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.43 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.31 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.96 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

27
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2023-04-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

80 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 68 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for nutrition and who required aspiration precautions and supervision with meals, the facility failed to provide a chopped diet as ordered by the physician, failed to provide supervision with eating on 3 days (3 breakfast meals) of the survey, and failed to ensure required safe swallowing strategies were implemented to prevent the resident from choking. These failures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 with diagnoses that included dementia, dysphasia, and anxiety. The care plan dated 5/1/25 identified Resident #14 was at risk for aspiration with interventions that included a mechanically altered chopped diet with aspiration precautions and assist with meal intake. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had severely impaired cognition and required supervision or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for elopement, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who requires assistance and an assistive device with ambulation did not exit the facility without staff knowledge, resulting in the resident being found walking on the side of a roadway in the dark, nine (9) miles from the facility after he/she sustained a fall. These failures resulted in a finding of Immediate Jeopardy. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included opiate dependence, acute infective endocarditis (an infection and inflammation of the inner lining of the heart valves and chambers), bacteremia (bacteria in the bloodstream), osteomyelitis (infection in the bone), and neuropathy (weakness, numbness and pain from nerve damage). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of four (4) indicative…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documents and policies for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure staff notified the physician/medical director and facility administration timely when a resident failed to return to the facility as scheduled following a leave of absence, and for one of three residents reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to notify the provider that the resident's evening medications were missed. The findings included:Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and adjustment disorder. Record review identified Person #1 was noted as Resident #1's responsible party. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11), indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required set-up assistance with personal hygiene and supervision…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documents and policies for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #1) reviewed for discharge, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to the resident to ensure a safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility after a thirty-day discharge notice was given. The findings included: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and adjustment disorder. Record review identified Person #1 was noted as Resident #1's responsible party. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #11 had a Brief Mental Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11), indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, required set-up assistance with personal hygiene and supervision with transfers and ambulation. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was a short term stay admission.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, interviews, and review of facility documents and policies for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed obtain a hospital discharge summary timely after a resident's readmission, and for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for leave of absence, the facility failed to ensure staff acted timely when a resident did not return as expected from a Leave of Absence, and failed to ensure staff were provided with a current facility policy that directed steps to follow when a resident did not return timely from a leave of absence. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and adjustment disorder. Record review identified Person #1 was noted as Resident #1's responsible party. Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 reported use of Marijuana. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to ensure consistent response and follow-up to Resident Council concerns according to facility policy. The findings include: Review of Resident Council minutes from 1/29/25 to 7/30/25 identified repeated concerns raised by residents regarding the following.Nurse aides using personal phones during work hours.Food quality issues, including cold meals, greasy or undercooked items, and meals served with reported allergens.Unmet food requests (e.g., butter, fruit, salt, and pepper).Incorrect meal tickets.The review identified there was no documented response from facility staff to concerns raised during the 2/26/25, 6/25/25, and 7/30/25 meetings, despite similar issues being previously reported. Additionally, the Food Service Director was not in attendance at the Resident Council meetings on 3/31/25, 5/28/25, 6/25/25, and 7/30/25, where food-related concerns were discussed. Interview with Resident #123 on 8/24/25 at 1:27 PM identified facility administration did not consistently follow up on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 7 residents (Resident 12, 14, 23, 28, 51, 105, 137) the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents and failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible. For 2 of 7 residents (Resident #12 and 14) reviewed for nutrition and who required aspiration precautions, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision during meals.For 2 of 12 residents (Resident #23 and 28), reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and follow smoking policies for residents with smoking violations. For 1 of 12 residents (Resident #51) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to complete and document leave of absence (LOA) risk assessments prior to allowing the resident to go on an independent LOA, failed to ensure staff reviewed, and the resident understood and abided by the LOA protocols, failed to develop and implement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, policy, and interviews for 5 of 5 nurse aides (NA #1, NA #6, NA #16, NA #17, and NA #18), the facility failed to ensure performance evaluations were completed, at least every 12 months. The findings include:Review of NA #1's personnel file identified that she was hired on 6/25/09 and failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed in the year of 2024 or to date, in 2025.Review of NA 18's personnel file identified that she was hired on 1/28/10 and failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed in the year of 2024 or to date, in 2025.Review of NA #17's personnel file identified that she was hired on 9/26/18 and failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed in the year of 2024 or to date, in 2025.Review of NA #6's personnel file identified that she was hired on 4/12/22 and failed to identify documentation that an annual performance evaluation was completed in the year of 2024 or to date, in 2025.Review of NA #16's personnel file…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated in the kitchen and nourishment rooms and failed to ensure the walk-in freezer was defrosted. The findings include: 1. Tour of the kitchen with [NAME] #1 on 8/24/25 at 7:15 AM identified the following.Main walk-in refrigerator identified a 1/2 cut up cucumber without being covered, labeled, or dated, 1/2 an onion not covered, labeled, or dated, 3 heads of lettuce not covered labeled or dated with dripping liquid and wilted leaves and brown spots, 9 stalks of celery uncovered sitting on a metal tray not covered, labeled, or dated. The walk-in freezer identified 7 brown meat patties in a blue bag not closed with frost on them not labeled or dated. [NAME] #1 indicated they were Salisbury steaks. They were not in their original container. A blue bag not closed with visible frost on the chopped-up onions not labeled or dated, a clear bag with grey colored meat that was not labeled or dated. [NAME] #1 indicated they were pork chops. A blue bag not closed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that monitoring and tracking related to a GI outbreak was documented, failed to ensure ongoing infection surveillance tracking, and for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #86) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to administer medications according to infection control standards and facility policy, and for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #90) reviewed for indwelling catheter, the facility failed to ensure the outlet valve of a supra pubic catheter collection bag was stored in a sanitary manner. The findings include: 1. A review of the state agency reportable event portal identified the facility reported 2 outbreaks since January 2024, one of which included a gastrointestinal outbreak (GI) in January 2025 that involved a total of 10 residents. Review of the documentation, provided by the former DNS, identified initially one resident developed nausea and vomiting on 1/4/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ongoing review of antibiotic stewardship including tracking and monitoring of use for residents who required antibiotic treatment for infection. The findings include:During a review of the facility infection prevention program on 8/26/25 at 8:07 AM, a request was made to RN #1 (Infection Preventionist) to provide documentation including antibiotic use including criteria, tracking and monitoring for all residents who required antibiotic treatments in the last 12 months (8/2024 - 8/2025). Although requested, RN #1 was unable to provide documentation related to antibiotic surveillance or tracking. Interview with RN #1 on 8/27/25 at 8:10 AM identified that she had taken on the role of the IP nurse in February 2025 and since that time she had not completed any infection tracking, antibiotic use, or statistical information. RN #1 identified since she began in the IP role, she had attended 2 medical staff meetings but had not prepared or provided any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 5 residents (Resident #15, 18, 22, and 38) reviewed for covid vaccinations, the facility failed to offer and/or provide education on covid vaccinations. The findings include: During a review of the facility infection prevention program on 8/26/25 at 8:07 AM, a request was made to RN #1 (Infection Preventionist) to provide documentation for covid vaccinations or signed refusals with education for a list of 5 sampled residents (Resident #15, 18, 22, 38, and 60) for the last 12 months (8/2024 - 8/2025). Although requested, the facility failed to provide any documentation related to covid vaccinations or declinations for Resident #15, 18, 22, and 38. Interview with RN #1 on 8/27/25 at 8:10 AM identified that she did not have any mechanism for tracking vaccinations for residents of the facility. RN #1 identified she could not locate any tracking information in the IP that was provided to her when she took the position, and the only way she knew to track vaccinations to look up each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 68 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #63) reviewed for dining, the facility failed to provide the resident a breakfast tray in a timely manner, resulting in the resident trying to obtain items from other resident's leftover trays. The findings include:Resident #63 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses that included anxiety disorder, specified depressive episodes, and orthopedic aftercare. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #63 had intact cognition, was independent with eating, and required supervision or touch assist with ambulating 50 feet.The care plan dated 7/15/25 identified Resident #63 was at increased risk for alterations in nutritional status secondary to alcohol use, major depressive disorder, emphysema, prediabetes, hypocalcemia, and obstructive sleep apnea. Interventions included encouraging oral intake at meals and providing current diet: regular texture, thin liquids.Observation on 8/24/25 at 9:42 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #130) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the resident received double portions per his/her request to receive double portions and per the physician order. The findings include:Resident #130 was admitted to the facility in June 2014 with diagnoses that included diabetes and malignant neoplasm of breasts. A physician's order dated 6/20/24 directed for a regular diet with double portions.The dietician note dated 3/18/25 at 1:50 PM identified Resident #130 requested to see the dietitian. Resident #130 complained he/she was still hungry after meals and requested increased portions. Resident #130 already receives double portions for meals and would recommend alternate foods on the meal tray. Resident #130 was agreeable to receive an egg salad sandwich at lunch and dinner. Kitchen updated.The dietitian quarterly assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #130 is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #45) reviewed for personal funds, the facility failed to provide quarterly financial statements to the resident. The findings include:Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, and chronic pain.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition.Interview with Resident #45 on 8/24/25 at 7:58 AM identified that the facility oversees his/her personal funds and he/she had not received a written financial statement in 2025.Interview with the Business Office Manager on 8/26/25 at 9:50 AM identified that she worked at the facility twice a week but was always accessible for staff and residents via telephone. The Business Office Manager indicated that Resident #45 was responsible for self and was most recently given a quarterly statement at the end of March/beginning of April…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #76) reviewed for pressure ulcer, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative was notified of a new wound. The findings include:Resident #76 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy, bipolar, and diabetes. The care plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #76 was at risk for skin impairment related to decreased mobility, with interventions that included applying zinc oxide to coccyx area, encourage resident not to sit in the wheelchair for extended periods of time, perform weekly skin checks, and notify physician or APRN of any changes. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #76 had moderately impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required maximum assistance with toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, turning side to side in bed, and transfers. Additionally, Resident #76 had a significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policies, and interviews for the only sampled resident (Resident #45) reviewed for personal funds, the facility failed to protect the resident from misappropriate of resident funds. The findings include:Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in June 2021 with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, paranoid personality disorder, and chronic pain.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition and based on a brief interview for mental status and review of the medical record the resident had no acute change in mental status from baseline, no signs of inattention, disorganized thinking, or altered level of consciousness, had no hallucinations or delusions, and no physical, verbal, or wandering behaviors.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #45 had intact cognition, was currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and based on a brief interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to report an allegation of staff to resident verbal abuse to the state agency per established timeframes. The findings include:Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses that included allergies, unspecified asthma and diabetes mellitus.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 was cognitively intact, independent with eating and independently mobile with the use of a wheelchair.The care plan dated 3/10/25 identified Resident #59 had the potential for alteration in nutrition with interventions that included accommodating resident's food preferences, observe allergies to pork, lactose intolerance and avoid serving pork, dairy, eggs, tomatoes and breaded foods.Interview with Resident #59 on 8/24/25 at 9:02 AM identified that [NAME] #2 had threatened him/her by saying (I am going to get you) after the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to remove an employee and initiate an investigation following a reported allegation of verbal abuse. The findings include:Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in 12/2023 with diagnoses that included allergies, unspecified asthma and diabetes mellitus.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 was cognitively intact, independent with eating and independently mobile with the use of a wheelchair.The care plan dated 3/10/25 identified Resident #59 had the potential for alteration in nutrition with interventions accommodating resident's food preferences, observe allergies to pork, lactose intolerance and avoid serving pork, dairy, eggs, tomatoes and breaded foods.Interview with Resident #59 on 8/24/25 at 9:02 AM identified that [NAME] #2 had threatened him/her that I am going to get you after the resident had reported to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 residents (Resident #4 and 17) reviewed for dementia and respiratory care, for Resident #4, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive individualized care plan when the resident was newly diagnoses with dementia, and for Resident #17 the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for a resident with a tracheostomy. The findings include: 1. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in April 2018 (readmission in July 2025) with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder and anxiety. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #4 did not have an identified diagnosis of dementia on the MDS. A Census form identified Resident #4 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 7/27/25. The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified the discharge diagnosis was urinary tract…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #51 and #105) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan to ensure interventions that addressed the residents history of unsupervised smoking, contraband items, and smoking practices while directly adjacent to the facility property while on LOA to maintain the residents safety, and for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #128) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to revise the care plan for an air mattress. The findings include: 1. Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, alcohol dependence, and nicotine dependence.A physician's order dated 3/8/23 directed Resident #51 may smoke with supervision.The care plan dated 5/19/25 identified Resident #51 as a smoker. Interventions directed to ensure that the resident abides by the facility smoking policy. The annual MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to administer medication according to professional standards. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 and was readmitted in July 2025 with diagnoses that included dysphasia, acid reflux, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. The care plan dated 5/1/25 identified Resident #14 had alteration in cardiac status related to diagnosis of hypertension and cardiac arrythmia with interventions that included administer medications as directed by the physician. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had severely impaired cognition and was totally dependent on staff for ADLs. A physician's order dated 6/24/25 directed to administer the following medications.Iron sulfate (iron supplement) enteric coated 325 mg 1 tablet daily.Pantoprazole, (delayed release, enteric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure a resident unable to carry out ADLs independently received necessary services to maintain proper grooming. The findings include:Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia, osteoarthritis, rash, and seborrheic dermatitis.The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #41 had severely impaired cognition and required a partial/moderate assist with personal hygiene.The care plan dated 6/19/25 identified person-centered objectives to meet Resident #41's medical, nursing, mental, and psycho-social needs that included an assist of 1 with showering on Friday's during the 3:00 PM - 11:00 PM shift and an assist of 1 with grooming, such as shaving and nail care. The care plan did not identify that Resident #41 had a history of refusing care.Observation with NA #1 on 8/24/25 at 8:12 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 residents (Resident #5, 41, 59, 60 and 128) the facility failed to ensure care according to professional standards. For 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to complete an assessment of the resident following an allegation of staff-to-resident physical mistreatment. For 1 of 4 residents (Resident #41) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL), the facility failed to ensure a resident unable to carry out ADLs independently received necessary services to maintain proper grooming. For 1 of 7 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for food, the facility failed to implement recommendations from an Allergy and Immunology consult for 40 days.For 1 of 2 residents (Resident #60) reviewed for skin conditions, the facility failed to ensure that podiatry consultant recommendations were reviewed and implemented.For 1 of 7 residents (Resident #128) reviewed for nutrition, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #76) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure an RN assessment and treatment (including an air mattress) was implemented when a new skin condition was found, and failed to complete weekly skin checks. The findings include:Resident #76 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy, bipolar, and diabetes. The care plan dated 4/28/25 identified Resident #76 was at risk for skin impairment related to decreased mobility, with interventions that included to encourage the resident not to sit in the wheelchair for extended periods of time, perform and document weekly skin checks, and notify physician of any changes. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #76 had moderately impaired cognition, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and required maximum assistance with toileting, dressing, personal hygiene, turning side to side in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility policies, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #17) reviewed for respiratory and tracheostomy care, the facility failed to complete tracheostomy care; including care of the inner cannula per facility policy, failed to change the tracheostomy mask and tubing for 7 weeks, failed to assess the resident for his/her ability to care for and suction the tracheostomy independently including obtaining a physician's orders to allow such, and failed to ensure necessary tracheostomy supplies did not run out. The findings include: Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in October 2023 (2 readmissions in July 2025) with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia, malignant neoplasm of the supraglottic and anterior surface of the epiglottis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The physician's order dated 3/28/25 directed to monitor/check tracheostomy site and inner cannula every shift: days, evenings, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. The findings include: Resident #14 was admitted to the facility in May 2021 and was a readmission in July 2025 with diagnoses that included dysphasia, acid reflux, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension. The care plan dated 5/1/25 identified Resident #14 had alteration in cardiac status related to diagnosis of hypertension and cardiac arrythmia with interventions that included administer medications as directed by the physician. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #14 had severely impaired cognition and was totally dependent on staff for ADLs. A physician's order dated 6/24/25 directed to administer the following medications.Iron sulfate (iron supplement) (enteric coated) 325 mg 1 tablet daily.Pantoprazole, (delayed release, enteric coated)(acid reflux) 40 mg 1 tablet twice a day.Metoprolol 24-hour (extended release) (slows the heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff had appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the kitchen. The findings include:Interview with Dietary Aide (DA #5) with the Dietary Director (Interim) present on 8/26/25 at 12:10 PM identified DA #5 could not explain how to label food going into the refrigerator. DA #5 nodded his head yes and walked away.Interview with DA #4 with the Dietary Director (Interim) present on 8/26/25 at 12:13 PM identified DA #4 could not answer how to date used food items to be stored in the refrigerator. DA #4 shrugged his shoulders and walked away.Interview with the Dietary Director (Interim) on 8/26/25 at 12:15 PM indicated that both DA #4 and DA #5 are sometimes at the end of the tray line to make sure the meal ticket and food on the tray match. Interview with DA #5 with the Assistant Recreation Person #1 (used as a translator) on 8/28/25 at 12:30 PM indicated if he needs to communicate, he can use the translator app on his phone. DA #5 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #59) reviewed for food, the facility failed to ensure food was served according to resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences. The findings include:Resident #59 was admitted to the facility in December 2023 with diagnoses that included allergies, unspecified asthma and diabetes mellitus.The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 was cognitively intact, independent with eating and independently mobile with the use of a wheelchair.The care plan dated 3/10/25 identified Resident #59 had the potential for alteration in nutrition with interventions that included accommodating resident's food preferences, observe allergies to pork, lactose intolerance and avoid serving pork, dairy, eggs, tomatoes and breaded foods.A physician's order dated 3/22/25 identified a food allergy to dairy and directed a regular diet, no concentrated sweets, no breaded foods, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interview, the facility failed to designate a qualified infection preventionist from August 2024 through February 2025 (approximately 7 months). The findings include:During a review of the infection prevention program on 8/26/25 at 8:07 AM interview with RN #1 (Infection Prevention IP nurse) identified that she began working as the facility IP nurse on 2/20/25. RN #1 further identified that prior to stepping into the role, she had worked as an RN supervisor in the facility, and the facility did not have an IP nurse for several months.Interview on 8/27/25 at 8:00 AM with the acting DNS identified that she had been covering as the DNS for the last five weeks and had worked as a DNS prior to that. The DNS identified that the facility did not have an IP nurse for several months prior to RN #1 taking over the role as there were issues filling the position. The DNS identified she had taken an infection preventionist certification at one point shortly after she started working at the facility in 8/2024 but never covered the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #15) reviewed for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations, the facility failed to offer and/or provide flu or pneumococcal immunizations. The findings include: During a review of the facility infection prevention program on 8/26/25 at 8:07 AM, a request was made to RN #1 (Infection Preventionist) to provide documentation for influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations or signed refusals with education for a list of 5 sampled residents ( Resident #15, 18, 22, 38, and 60) for the last 12 months (8/2024 - 8/2025).Although requested, the facility failed to provide any documentation related to influenza vaccination or declination for Resident #15 for 2024. Review of a signed pneumococcal consent for Resident #60 dated 10/26/24 identified the resident received the vaccination in the past. Further review of an immunization list for Resident #60 failed to identify any documentation related to pneumococcal vaccination including type and date administered. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and interviews, for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for abuse, (Resident #2), the facility failed to ensure that the resident was free from verbal abuse form a staff member. Resident #2 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and a major depressive disorder. A quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of thirteen (13) indicative of intact cognition, was supervision with Acitivities of Daily Living (ADLs), and had no behaviors. A care plan dated [DATE] identified that the resident has a diagnosis of depression with interventions that directed to administer antidepressants as ordered and to monitor the residents mood for changes. Review of a reportable event form dated [DATE] identified the resident reported a staff member was verbally rude towards h/her, quoting the staff member as calling h/her ugly and that h/her significant other died just to get away from h/her. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #3) reviewed for change of condition, the facility failed to respect the resident's request to call 911 to be transferred to the hospital. The findings include: Resident #3's diagnoses included right below the knee amputation, diabetes mellitus with foot ulcers, bipolar disorder, peripheral vascular disease, heart failure, and stent (tube to assist blood flow) placements in left leg arteries. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was alert and oriented, required extensive assistance for bed mobility, transfers, was independent for mobility in a wheelchair, and had two (2) venous status ulcers. The resident care plan dated 3/7/24 identified Resident #3 had a diagnoses of post-traumatic stress syndrome and had a left lower extremity venous ulcer. Interventions directed to identify the resident's specific wishes for comfort and safety,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of two (2) sampled residents (Resident #2) who were reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication was re-ordered and available at the time the medication was due to be administered and the provider was notified when the medication was not available. The findings include: Resident #2 diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus, adjustment disorder, depression, and bipolar disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 made consistent and reasonable decision regarding tasks of daily life. A physician's order dated 10/21/23 directed to administer Trulicity pen injector (a medication given once a week for diabetes management) 4.5 milligrams (mg)/0.5 milliliters (ml) give 0.5 ml subcutaneously once a week on Saturdays on the 3-11:00 PM shift. The Resident Care Plan dated 10/26/23 identified Resident #2 had potential for nutrition risk related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0836 — isolated
    Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain staffing levels to meet the minimum requirements of the Connecticut General Statute 19a-563h regarding 3.0 hours of direct care. The findings include: Review of facility documentation identified the census was 123 on 8/10/24 and 8/11/24. Review of the calculation of the staffing requirements identified the facility required 266.91 hours of licensed and nurse aide staffing for 7:00 AM to 9:00 PM. Review of the facility staffing identified the facility had 210 hours of licensed and nurse aide staffing hours, the facility was under the required hours by 56 hours. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 8/15/24 at 1:51 PM identified the facility did not have a specific policy on staffing, they based staffing on the acuity level of the residents and census. The DON identified there is an interim person in the scheduling department who was responsible for ensuring staffing met the 3.0 regulations. The DON identified on the above dates staffing did not meet the requirements of the 3.0.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan included discharge planning. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included depression, paranoid personality, and atrial fibrillation. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 was alert and oriented, and required substantial/maximal assistance for ADL care. The MDS indicated Resident #1 wanted to be asked about returning to the community on all assessments, that a referral to Local Contact Agency was not made. Review of Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 1/8/2024 and failed to identify care plan discharge goals or interventions for Resident #1. The social worker's note dated 1/18/2024 at 2:37 PM identified that an application was completed for Money Follows the Person (MFP) by SW #2, for discharge planning. A copy was provided to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include medication administration documentation. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 was alert and oriented and required substantial/maximal assistance for ADL care. Review of the Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/23/2024 identified resident is often non-complaint with medication administration. Interventions included review of risk of non-compliance with resident. A physician's order dated 5/1/2024 directed Nitroglycerin 0.4mg, 1 tablet, sublingual once a day as needed. The nurse's note dated 5/3/2024 at 2:52 PM identified that the charge nurse notified the RN supervisor RN (RN #1) that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #12) reviewed for a change in condition, the facility failed to act on physician orders timely for a resident with a change in condition, and for one of four residents (Resident #2) reviewed for nutrition, the facility failed to ensure the diet orders were transcribed accurately upon admission. The findings include: 1. Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included oropharyngeal (throat) cancer and nausea. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 was alert and oriented, required extensive assistance of one staff for ADLs, and a feeding tube. The RCP dated [DATE] identified Resident #12 was at an increased risk for alteration in nutritional status due to oropharyngeal cancer, respiratory failure followed by a tracheostomy (surgical airway), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, and nothing by mouth (NPO) with a feeding tube. Interventions directed NPO with tube feedings and to monitor for signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #15) reviewed for care and services, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate record to include timely access to the medical record. The findings include: Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], under the ownership of the prior company. Review of Resident #15's paper chart identified the record contained the following information; Resident #15's patient summary from the hospital prior to admission to the facility, short term rehabilitation admission paperwork, and insurance coverage documentation. Although requests for access to the clinical record were made, the facility was unable to provide access. The facility failed to provide Resident #15's complete and comprehensive medical record, therefore, an investigation was unable to be conducted. Interview with the DNS on 5/14/2024 at 10:00 AM identified she was unable to produce Resident #15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, observations, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #4) reviewed for call bells, the facility failed to ensure the resident was provided with a device timely to allows the resident to call for staff assistance. The findings included: Resident # 4 had diagnoses of diffuse traumatic brain injury, epilepsy, and displaced bimaleollar (ankle area) fracture of the left lower leg. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #4 was alert and oriented, and required staff assist with ADLS and toileting. Review of the Resident Care Plan dated 3/18/2024 identified a risk for falls. Interventions directed to keep the call light within reach. Observation and interview with NA #1 on 5/13/2024 at 11:18 AM identified Resident #4 with a non-functioning call bell, and no hand bell was available in Resident #4's room. NA #1 was unable to indicate how long Resident #4's call bell had been broken and failed to identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #2) who required staff assistance with personal hygiene, the facility failed to ensure privacy was maintained during the provision of personal care. The findings include: Resident #2's diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety, depression, dysfunction of the bladder and urinary retention. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had memory recall deficits, required maximum assistance from staff for hygiene, toileting, bathing, and dressing, and had an indwelling foley catheter. The Resident Care Plan dated 12/8/23 identified that Resident #2 had a self-care deficit and had a foley catheter due to urinary retention. Interventions directed two (2) person assistance with hygiene needs and monitor for signs and symptoms of urinary infection. During a tour of the facility on 2/5/24 at 12:30 PM observations from the hallway into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) sampled residents, (Resident # 1), who were reviewed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure provision of routine and emergency-controlled medications for a resident whose pain medication(s) supply was depleted. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain with spasms, bipolar disorder, and history of cocaine abuse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was without cognitive impairment, required two person assist with mobility and toileting, one person assist with transfer and was without pain. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/22/23 identified Resident #1 was at risk for pain related to a diagnosis of chronic pain activity with interventions directed to encourage residents to report pain and complete a pain assessment on admission quarterly and as needed. Physician orders dated 10/4/23 directed morphine sulfate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents, (Resident # 1), who were reviewed for care and services, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for a resident who required hospitalization for acute opiate withdrawal and verbalized suicidal/homicidal ideations. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain with spasms, bipolar disorder, and history of cocaine abuse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was without cognitive impairment, required two person assist with mobility and toileting, one person assist with transfer and had no indicators of pain. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/22/23 identified Resident #1 was at risk for pain related to activity of daily living (ADL) function with interventions that directed to encourage residents to report pain and complete a pain assessment on admission quarterly and as needed. A nurse's note dated 10/11/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents, (Resident # 1), who were reviewed for pain management, the facility failed to ensure the availability of prescribed pain medication. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic pain with spasms, bipolar disorder, and history of cocaine abuse. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was without cognitive impairment, required two person assist with mobility and toileting, one person assist with transfer and was without pain. The Resident Care Plan dated 8/22/23 identified Resident #1 was at risk for pain related to a diagnosis of chronic pain with interventions that directed to encourage residents to report pain and complete a pain assessment on admission quarterly and as needed. Physician orders dated 10/4/23 directed morphine sulfate Extended release (ER) 50 mg every 12 hours twice daily to be administered at 6:00 AM and 6:00 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed for Accidents (Resident #4), the facility failed to ensure that a resident did not leave the facility unattended for an extended period of time without staff knowledge. The finding includes: Resident #4 had diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) and alcohol abuse. A care plan dated 6/22/22 identified that the resident had been approved for a Leave of Absence (LOA) order with a repsonsible party with inteventions that included educate the resident on LOA policies. A quarterly Minimum data assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #4 had intact cognition, required minimal assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), and was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. An elopement risk assessment dated [DATE] identified that the resident was not at risk for elopement. A nurse's note dated 12/20/23 at 4:37 PM identified that the resident was missing, a code purple was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for Resident Council review, the facility failed to ensure staff did not attend the Resident Council meeting unless invited by the Council. The findings include: The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 was alert and oriented. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 was alert and oriented. Review of facility Resident Council Minutes dated 8/8/2023 at 2:35 PM identified a Resident Council meeting was held and the topics discussed included discharge planning process, Money Follows the Person (MFP) and housing after discharge to the community. Minutes listed the following staff attended: the DON, Director of Physical Therapy (DPT), SW #1, Director of Recreational Therapy (DRT), and Recreational Therapy Assistant (RTA #1). The summary of the meeting identified residents were reminded that the staff discussed discharge planning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure staff reported an allegation of neglect timely, and the facility failed to ensure the State Agency was notified of an allegation of neglect in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included sepsis, cellulitis, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two (2) person with bed mobility and one (1) person assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/8/2023 identified Resident #1 as at risk and having skin impairment. Interventions include barrier cream with incontinence care and as needed, reposition when in bed, weekly skin checks, and elevate heels while in bed. Interview with Person #1 on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documention of a skin assessment completed following an allegation of neglect. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included sepsis, cellulitis, diabetes mellitus, and anxiety disorder. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had moderately impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of two (2) person with bed mobility and one (1) person assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, and transfers. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/8/2023 identified Resident #1 as at risk and having skin impairment. Interventions include barrier cream with incontinence care and as needed, reposition when in bed, weekly skin checks, and elevate heels while in bed. Interview with Person #1 on 8/24/2023 at 10:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that the chemical sanitizing solution was maintained at the recommended concentration level, and failed to ensure that wet wiping cloths were stored in an approved sanitizing solution. The findings included: During an initial tour and observations of the facility kitchen with the Dietary Manager on 3/27/23 at 10:25 AM, the far left basin of a 3 basin sink was observed to have pink liquid along with 2 large metal sheet pans and a large metal pot submerged in the pink liquid. There were also 2 white wet wiping cloths, one on a large stainless-steel bench which the Dietary Manager identified as a food prep table, and one on a ledge to the far right of the 3 basin sink. Observations failed to identify the use of sanitizing solution buckets with wet wiping cloths in the kitchen. Interview with the Dietary Manager immediately following this observation, he identified that the kitchen did not use any sanitizing buckets; rather, the staff would use the pink liquid, which he identified as a QAC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to review the Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual at least annually and failed to conduct and document environmental rounds, and for 2 residents (Resident #95 and 314) the facility failed to store respiratory equipment according to infection control practices. The findings include: 1. Review of infection control documentation failed to reflect the Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual was reviewed at least annually and failed reflect environmental rounds were completed and documented monthly. Interview with the Infection Preventionist, (RN #1) on 3/29/23 at 1:11 PM indicated the annual review signature sheet for the Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual was blank. RN #1 indicated she had not reviewed the Infection Control Policy and Procedure Manual, nor had she asked the medical director to review the manual in the last year. RN #1 indicated she has not attended any of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to have an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The findings include: Interview with Infection Preventionist RN #1 on 4/3/23 at 10:28 AM indicated she was unable to find the antibiotic stewardship policy book. RN #1 indicated she was responsible for the antibiotic stewardship program and providing antibiotic stewardship education and she had not done that in the last year with the nursing staff and did not have any sign in sheets showing when the nursing staff were last educated on the antibiotic stewardship program. RN #1 indicated the nursing staff do not do SBAR documentation or have a process to monitor and document signs and symptoms of infection prior to the APRN or physician prescribing an antibiotic. RN #1 indicated the nursing staff do not document for 3 days prior to an antibiotic for a suspected urinary tract infection and the nurses or residents just ask the APRN who will start an antibiotic at the same…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #13, 30, 32, 74, 82) reviewed for pneumococcal vaccines, the facility failed to offer/administer the pneumococcal vaccines according to Centers for Disease Control guidelines. The findings include: 1. Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Facility documentation identified Resident #13's representative gave consent for the administration of Prevnar 13 on 2/10/22. Review of the Pneumovax 23 and Prevnar 13 and 20 consent form indicated Resident #13's representative gave verbal consent on 8/11/22 and 2/13/23 for Resident #13 to receive the vaccines. Review of the clinical record identified Resident #13 did not receive the Pneumovax 23, the Prevnar 13 or Pneumococcal 20 vaccines. Interview and review of the clinical record the Infection Preventionist (RN #1) on 3/29/23 at 12:51 PM indicated on 2/13/23 she had received verbal consent from the resident's conservator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 4 residents (Resident #47 and 57) reviewed for resident to resident abuse, the facility failed to ensure the residents were free from physical abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #47 was admitted to the facility in April 2018 with diagnoses that included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and depressive episodes. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #57 had intact cognition and required supervision with personal hygiene. The physician's order report dated 1/1/23 - 1/31/23 directed to administer Celexa (anti-depressant medication) 20mg once a day for depressive episodes. A reportable event form dated 1/9/23 at 2:00 AM identified Resident #47 was hit by his/her roommate. Resident #47 and roommate had a verbal altercation and the roommate allegedly hit Resident #47 on the right foot with a back scratcher and subsequently, Resident #47 complained of right foot pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR), the facility failed to ensure a level II PASARR was completed when required. The findings included: Review of a Level I PASARR dated 1/30/20, prior to facility admission, was negative. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included syncope, depression, and schizoaffective disorder. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had intact cognition, required the assistance of 1 staff member for transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The MDS further identified Resident #42 had active diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder and depression. A physician's order dated 3/22/23 identified that Resident #42's medications included Risperdal (antipsychotic medication) 0.5 mg 3 times daily for schizoaffective disorder and Citalopram 20 mg (antidepressant medications) daily for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #42) reviewed for vision, the facility failed develop a comprehensive care plan to address vision loss, and for 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to care plan and monitor inappropriate sexual behaviors. The findings include: 1. Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included syncope, bilateral open angle glaucoma, and schizoaffective disorder. Review of the clinical record identified multiple optometry notes dated from 3/2/21 that identified Resident #42's history of blindness due to end stage open angle glaucoma. An optometry note dated 4/21/22 identified that Resident #42's bilateral visual acuity at 20/LP (light perception only). The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had intact cognition, required the assistance of 1 staff member for transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and required a wheelchair.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to revise the care plan after multiple falls. The findings include: Resident #42 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included syncope, end stage open angle glaucoma, and schizoaffective disorder. An optometry note dated 3/2/21 identified Resident #42 had a history of blindness due to end stage open angle glaucoma. An optometry note dated 4/21/22 identified that Resident #42's bilateral visual acuity at 20/LP (light perception only). The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #42 had intact cognition, required the assistance of 1 staff member for transfers, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and required a wheelchair. Further, although Resident #42 had a documented history of blindness due to end stage open angle glaucoma, the MDS identified the resident had adequate vision (sees fine detail, including regular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, policy, and interview for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #82) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for monthly vital signs. The findings include: Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hypertension, chronic kidney disease and diabetes. Physician's orders dated 10/5/22 directed to administer Amlodipine (medication for blood pressure) 10mg daily, Labetalol (medication for blood pressure)100 mg twice daily and Lisinopril (medication for blood pressure) 5mg daily. Further, the physician's orders directed to obtain vital signs monthly. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #82 had moderately impaired cognition and diagnoses of heart failure. The care plan dated 1/12/23 identified interventions to administer medications as ordered and obtain and vital signs as ordered. Review of vital signs 11/1/22 through 3/30/23 failed to reflect monthly vital signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for respiratory therapy, the facility failed to change respiratory equipment per facility policy. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The significant change of condition MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had intact cognition and was totally dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. Additionally, Resident #30 received oxygen therapy. A physician's order dated 2/22/23 directed to provide oxygen at 2 liters via nasal cannula and change and date the oxygen tubing every week on Fridays 11:00 PM - 7:00AM. The care plan dated 3/14/23 identified the resident requires oxygen therapy. Interventions included to provide supplemental oxygen per physician order. Observation on 3/27/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to complete nurse aide performance evaluations at least once every 12 months. The findings include: Interview and review of facility documentation with the DNS on 3/30/23 at 11:25 AM identified that annual nurse aide performance evaluations had not been completed in 2022. The DNS indicated the pandemic and multiple changes in administrative personnel were factors and indicated the evaluations should have been completed. Review of the performance evaluation policy directs the facility to provide employees with feedback on their performance 90 days post hire and annually.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 4 of 6 medication carts, and 1 of 3 narcotic refrigerator freezers, the facility failed to maintain the medication carts and the narcotic refrigerator freezer in a clean and sanitary manner. The findings include: a. Observation of the medication cart on 3/29/23 at 11:29 AM on the Spruce & Elm unit with RN #1 and LPN #1 identified an accumulation of loose medication (pills) and blister pack back covers at the bottom of the first drawer and third drawer and/or stains and spilled liquids at bottom of second drawer. Interview with LPN #1 on 3/29/23 at 11:38 AM identified she was not aware of the loose pills and/or blister pack back covers and/or stains and/or spilled liquids at the bottom of medication drawer. LPN #1 indicated it is the responsibility of the nurses to keep the medication cart clean. b. Observation of the medication cart on the First floor on the Birch & Cedar unit with RN #1 and LPN #2 on 3/29/23 at 11:35 AM identified an accumulation of loose medication (pills) and blister pack back covers at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-06-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing received education, training and competencies related to respiratory and enteral feeding care and IV therapy. The findings include: 1. Review of the Facility Assessment Tool identified there was one resident in the facility with a tracheostomy, and one resident with and enteral feeding tube. Review of the nursing competencies provided, dated 2/14/20 and 1/13/21, for tracheostomy care, identified only 10 of 58 licensed nurses received competency training in tracheostomy care. Additionally, the documentation failed to reflect that licensed nurses received competencies on enteral feeding care. Interview with RN #3 on 6/9/21 at 10:03 AM identified she has been employed by the facility for the previous 10 months as the staff development nurse, and was responsible to ensure competency training at the facility. RN #3 indicated she had believed some training had been provided by the contracted oxygen company who provides services, but did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #85 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #85 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the admission record identified Person #4 was Resident #85's Power of Attorney (POA) for care. Review of the immunization consent tracking record dated 12/20/20 identified consent to administer the COVID-19 vaccination to Resident #85 was not obtained, and the residents POA could not be reached. Nurse's note dated 12/22/20 identified Resident #85 was provided education and signed a consent to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. A nurse's note dated 12/29/20 identified Resident #85 refused the COVID-19 vaccination and the nursing supervisor was aware. The electronic health record immunization update identified Resident #85 consented to the administration of the Covid 19 vaccine and the first dose was administered on 12/29/20. Review of the immunization record dated 12/29/20 identified Resident #85 received dose 1 of SARS-COV-2 (Covid-19)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #117) reviewed for advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law, relating to the provision of health care when the individual is incapacitated), the facility failed to provide information in a manner easily understood by the resident or resident representative about the right to formulate an advanced directive. The findings include: Resident #117 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included altered mental status, disorientation and vascular dementia The care plan dated [DATE] identified Resident #117 had a potential for impaired communication with interventions that included the use of a translator or alternate form of communication. The admission MDS [DATE] identified Resident #117 had severely impaired cognition, primarily spoke Spanish and required an interpreter for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy, and interviews the facility failed to ensure preventative maintenance was conducted on facility equipment used in the shower room. The findings include: Interview with Resident #108 and Resident #130 on 6/9/21 at 10:40 AM identified that they were concerned with the safety of the shower chairs in use as they rocked when they sat in them and did not have balance. Observation with Resident #130 on 6/9/21 at 11:10 AM in the second floor double shower room identified a shower chair that had only three rubber cups on three of the four legs of the chair which made the chair rock when sat upon. Observation with Resident #108 on 6/9/21 in the single shower room on the second floor identified the shower chair had a rubber cup missing from a leg which made the chair rock and be unsteady when sat upon. Interview with PT-A #1 on 6/9/21 identified she would immediately remove that shower chair and bring in a replacement. PT-A # 1 also identified that if the shower chair was reported to be missing a rubber safety cup, it should be written in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #73, 26, 432 and 332) reviewed for resident to resident altercations and allegations of mistreatment, the facility failed to protect Resident #73, 26 and 432 from Resident #95's abuse, and failed to ensure Resident #332 was free from staff abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #95 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia with behavioral disturbance and violent behaviors. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #95 had severely impaired cognition, and required limited assistance with ambulation in the room, unit and the hallway. Additionally, the MDS identified Resident #95 exhibited physical behavior symptoms directed toward others and wandering that may significantly intrude other's privacy. a. A Reportable Event Form dated 5/20/20 at 7:30 PM identified Resident #95 walked down the hall to Resident #73's room and punched her/him in the head. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-15 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #332) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to provide training, upon hire, to a nurse aide on the abuse/neglect policy. The findings include: Resident #332 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, seizures, anxiety and depression. The care plan dated on 2/3/20 identified Resident #332 exhibits and/or is at risk for depressed mood with interventions to monitor for changes in mood/behaviors and follow up with psychiatry. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #332 had intact cognition, exhibited no behaviors and was independent with ADLs. The care plan dated 2/27/20 identified another resident reported being threatened by Resident #332. Interventions included to allow Resident#332 time to verbalize thoughts and feelings, and encourage the resident to seek staff assistance in helping to solve issues with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #11) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to notify the ombudsman of when the resident was transferred to the hospital multiple times. The findings include: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure and end stage renal disease. A review of the clinical record identified Resident #11 was discharged from the facility and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], 3/21/21 and 4/10/21. Interview and review of the clinical record review with SW #1 on 6/11/21 at 12:03 PM identified that when a resident is discharged to the hospital, she receives a copy of the written notice provided to the resident or responsible party from the nursing staff, and she would send a cumulative list on a monthly basis of the discharges to the ombudsman. Review of the list of residents sent to the ombudsman…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-15 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and interviews for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #50) reviewed for PASRR, the facility failed to complete a PASRR when required. The findings include: The hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #50 had been hospitalized for inability to take care of him/herself at home, and a decreased ability for abstract thinking. Resident #50 was to be discharged to a Skilled Nursing Facility with a plan to obtain a conservator. Resident #50 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis that included schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. The care plan dated 4/6/21 identified Resident #50 receives psychotropic medications due to a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder. Interventions include to ensure social services provides supportive services as needed. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #50 had Schizophrenia, depression and anxiety disorder. Review of a PASSR level II dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility policy and staff interviews for 1 of 16 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for smoking, the facility failed to conduct a quarterly smoking assessment, and for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #36) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the facility failed to consistently monitor orthostatic blood pressures for a resident who was prescribed an antipsychotic medication. The findings include: 1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included a stroke, schizoaffective disorder, unspecified psychosis and personality disorder. A physician's order dated 1/21/21 directed Resident #7 may smoke with supervision. The quarterly smoking assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 was safe to smoke with supervision. The care plan dated 1/29/21 identified Resident #7 required supervised smoking. Interventions included Resident #7 will be assessed on admission and quarterly for supervised smoking. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #7 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure storage of intravenous (IV) medications and equipment. Additionally, the failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured in a locked environment and only authorized personnel were permitted access. The findings include: 1. Observation and interview with the DNS on 6/9/21 at 11:45 AM identified the nursing office, near the second-floor nurses station, was unoccupied with the door open. Inside this office the following supplies were unsecured; emergency IV cart, various IV fluids and supplies and needles. The office was left with the door opened out to the hallway where residents with the ability to self-propel were nearby. The DNS identified that the emergency cart should have been locked. Interview with RN #7 on 6/9/21 at 12:55 PM identified she was in the nurse's office but left the area momentarily to tend to other business. RN #7 believed the emergency cart may have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation and interview, the facility failed ensure food items were stored in accordance with facility policy. The findings include: Observation on 6/7/21 at 11:25 AM in the third-floor nourishment room refrigerator identified a sign on the front door that read (contents of fridge to contain a label with date, and any food not labeled is to be discarded). Inside the refrigerator was a yellow bag of food items without the benefit of a label. Contents of the bag included a clear bag of fruit which appeared to be bananas and grapes, as well as a container of strawberries and grapes. Interview with RN #1 on 6/7/21 at 11:30 AM identified food in the nourishment fridge should be labeled with the resident name, date and time. RN #1 was unable to find a label on the yellow bag or inside the yellow bag on the contents. Interview with RN #1 on 6/7/21 at 1:00 PM identified subsequent to surveyor inquiry she was able to identify the food as being delivered to Resident #66 by his/her family member two days prior. RN #1 indicated a staff member should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-06-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to properly store waste in a covered compactor. The findings include: Observation of the facilities municipal solid waste containers on 6/7, 6/8, 6/9, 6/10 and 6/11/21 identified a Roll-Off Compactor with visible garbage inside without the benefit of a covering or lid. The compactor measured approximately 12 ft. in length by 8 ft. in width. Interview with the Director of Dietary and Regional Director of Dietary on 6/7/21 at 10:16 AM identified the compactor is currently being used for all types of garbage, including medical and food. The compactor originally had a cover, but at some point, the cover broke. The Director of Dietary and Regional Director of Dietary were unable to identify when the compactor broke. Interview with the Director of Maintenance on 6/10/21 at 11:00 AM identified the compactor was previously situated within a cement pad. The cement pad subsequently broke and was unable to be repaired at that time, which caused the compactor's covering as un-restorable.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-06-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 3 residents (Resident #29, 89 and 232) reviewed for infection control, the facility failed to follow infection control practices according to professional standards. Additionally, the facility failed to consistently maintain monthly environmental rounds. The findings include: 1. Resident #29's diagnoses included diabetes, gastroparesis Hyperglycemia, Hyperlipidemia, Hypokalemia and Acute Kidney failure. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #29 had a diagnoses of depression, psychotic disorder and schizophrenia. The care plan dated 4/5/21 identified Resident #29 had diabetes with a goal of remaining free from complication related to diabetes. Interventions included the administration of medications, including insulin injections as ordered by doctor The physician's order dated 5/26/21 directed to administer Lantus Solution 100 unit/ml (Insulin Glargine) inject 10 units subcutaneously one time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2026-02-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) sampled residents (Resident #1) who were admitted for short term rehabilitation, the facility failed to implement and document an ongoing discharge plan for a resident to ensure a safe and effective transition back into the community. The findings include:Resident #1's diagnoses included bacteremia, intraspinal abscess and granuloma, and anxiety disorder. The admission history and physical summary dated 11/24/25 identified Resident #1 had unstable housing, was admitted to the long-term care facility for short term rehabilitation following hospital discharge on [DATE]. The social service admission note dated 11/28/25 at 11:23 AM identified Resident #1 was seen for admission to the facility. The note indicted prior to hospitalization in November 2025 Resident #1 was living at a friend's house, discharge plans were discussed and Resident #1 reported he/she would go back to the friend's house if no other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-02-05 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record reviews, facility documentation, facility policies and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who was reviewed for a complaint of mice in the room, the facility failed to ensure the pest control company was informed when the mice were first noticed in the resident's room. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included anxiety disorder, mood disorder, and chronic pain. The facility maintenance repair log identified that on the following dates 10/17/23, 10/19/23 and 12/26/23 mice activity in Resident #1's room was reported. The Service Inspection Reports from the pest control company identified they provided services on 10/13/23, 11/13/23, 11/27/23, 12/11/23, 12/21/23, 1/5/24 and 1/8/24 and although the documentation identified there were mouse sightings in specific rooms and treatment was done accordingly, the documentation failed to identify the mouse sightings reported in Resident #1's room on 10/17/23, 10/19/23, and 12/26/23. The Service Inspection Report dated 1/22/24 identified the Assistant Director of Maintenance informed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-04-03 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and policy for 1 resident (Resident #112) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative and failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when the residents were transferred to the hospital. Further, for 4 other residents (Resident #1, 6, 53, and 63) reviewed as part of the expansion for hospital transfers, the facility failed provide timely notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the hospital transfers. The findings include: 1. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder. A nurses note dated 12/28/22 identified Resident #112 was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. A nurses note dated 12/31/22 identified Resident #112 was readmitted to the facility. A nurses note dated 1/2/23 identified Resident #112 was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-04-03 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation and policy for 1 resident (Resident #112) reviewed for hospitalization, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice when the resident was transferred to the hospital. 1. Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder. A nurses note dated 12/28/22 identified Resident #112 was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. A nurses note dated 12/31/22 identified Resident #112 was readmitted to the facility. A nurses note dated 1/2/23 identified Resident #112 was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Review of the clinical record failed to reflect the facility had provided the resident and/or the resident representative a notice of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 1/2/23. Facility documentation identified, after their review, staff could not find that the notice of bed hold had been provided to the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-04-03 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 13 of 13 residents (Residents #3, 5, 10, 21, 47, 75, 81, 83, 95, 97, 103, 105, and 106), reviewed for resident assessments, the facility failed to transmit the residents' admission, quarterly, annual, and discharged MDS assessments in a timely manner in accordance with regulatory requirements. The findings include: 1. Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment had an ARD of 10/17/22. The MDS was transmitted on 1/15/23 (90 days later). 2. Resident #5 quarterly MDS assessment had an ARD of 11/22/22. The MDS was transmitted on 1/15/23 (84 days later). 3. Resident #10 quarterly MDS assessment had an ARD of 10/26/22. The MDS was transmitted on 1/15/23 (81 days later). 4. Resident #21 annual MDS had an ARD of 10/7/22. The MDS was transmitted on 1/15/23 (100 days later). 5. Resident #47 quarterly MDS assessment had an ARD of 10/2/22. The MDS was transmitted on 1/15/23 (105 days later). 6. Resident #75 discharge MDS assessment had an ARD) of 10/18/22. The MDS was transmitted never submitted. 7. Resident #81…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-04-03 · tag F0851 — pattern
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, and interviews, the facility failed to provide complete and accurate direct care staffing information for the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) staffing data report by the reporting period due date. The findings include: The PBJ report for Quarter 1, 2022 (October 1- December 31) identified no RN hours were reported for 10/2022, [DATE], and [DATE] by the required deadline of 2/14/23. An interview with the DNS on 3/30/23 at 10:20 AM identiifed the facility had adequate nursing staffing, including RN hours, during Quarter 1, 2022. The DNS could not explain why the information was not submitted with the PBJ reporting prior to the deadline.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2021-06-15 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 6 residents (Resident #8, 10, 12, 44, 95 and 123) reviewed for MDS assessments, the facility failed to accurately code the MDS for medications and Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR). The findings include: 1. Resident #8's diagnoses included venous stasis ulcer, anemia, and dementia. A physician wound note dated 1/12/21 identified Resident #8's stage 3 pressure ulcer had resolved on 12/12/20. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #8 had one stage 3 pressure ulcer. Review of physician's orders dated 2/1/21 - 2/28/21 failed to reflect a treatment for a pressure ulcer. Interview and review of the clinical record on 6/11/21 at 9:56 AM with RN #1 identified that, according to the wound physician documentation, Resident #8's stage 3 pressure ulcer had healed as of 12/12/20, and should not have been coded as a pressure ulcer on the MDS. 2. Resident #12's diagnoses included dementia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$61,814 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $37,749 — penalty dated 2025-08-29
  • $24,065 — penalty dated 2024-12-02
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-09-20 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ESSENTIAL HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.5-1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 54.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GEWIRTZ, ESTHERIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF38%since 06/13/2025
LANDA, SARIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 06/13/2025
SALAMON, MENAJEMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF44%since 06/13/2025
SALAMON, MORDEJAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF7%since 06/13/2025
MAYER, ABRAHAMIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
MAYER, BERRYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
MAYER, MOSHEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
MAYER, YOSSIIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
GEWIRTZ, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2022
THOMPSON, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/08/2025
YEBOAH, BENJAMINIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
BURG & WEINGARTEN, CPA, PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
ZELLA HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-33.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.5M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 89%Medicare 9%Other / private 3%

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$469per resident / day
operating cost
$14,263per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$351per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075397. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next