No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Torrington Center For Nursing & Rehabilitation LLC

80 Fern Dr, Torrington, CT 06790 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 75 certified beds · (860) 294-7300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (860) 294-7300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (21% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (41) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
16 Bird St · (860) 496-9565 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.6 mi
28 E Elm St · (860) 482-5621 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.4 mi
320 E Elm St · (855) 955-2534 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.2%18.0%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%6.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.3%0.7%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms20.0%22.3%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.9%3.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.4%16.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication39.3%17.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.0%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.6%24.7%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.7%17.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.6%69.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.3%24.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.9%10.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.542.061.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days4.071.461.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.5%CMS range 39.1–63.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.7%CMS range 6.8–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge41.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.7%CMS range 6.5–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.561.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.15
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.63
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
21.1%
Total nursing turnover
38.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 69.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.15 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.34 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 21% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-28)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-24)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

41 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #19) reviewed for falls, the facility failed to provide appropriate assistance to prevent a fall with injury. The findings include: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a history of cancer of the bladder, muscle weakness, dementia and falls. The care card dated 3/11/19 identified Resident #19 required supervision with ambulation and modified assistance with toileting. A fall assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 was at moderate risk for falling. The quarterly MDS (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #19 had moderately impaired cognition, was independent with bed mobility, transfers, and walking in room. The MDS also identified Resident #19 was independent with set up help only for toilet use, was frequently incontinent of bladder, and required supervision with locomotion. The care plan dated 8/15/19 identified Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-05-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1of 4 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure a grievance was completed when the resident reported a delay in care and call bell response time. The findings include:Resident #2's diagnosis included conversion disorder with mixed symptoms, neuralgia, and hypertension.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #2 had intact cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required substantial assistance with personal hygiene, and dependent with transfers and toileting.The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/12/26 identified Resident #2 was frequently incontinent of bowel/bladder function. Interventions included providing incontinence care, incontinence care products as needed, and monitoring changes in continent status.Interview with Resident #2 on 5/4/2026 at 12:50 PM identified on 4/17/26 he/she experienced issues with Nurse Aide (NA) #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-27 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #3) reviewed for change in condition, the facility failed to notify the physician when a resident was exhibiting behaviors that included agitation, anxiety, and aggression. The findings include: Resident #3 had diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, antisocial personality disorder, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsion, and unspecified dementia with severe anxiety. A physician's order dated 10/7/24 directed to administer trazodone (a medication used for anxiety, depression, and insomnia) 50 milligrams (mg) every 6 hours as needed for anxiety. The 5-day MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11) indicative of moderately impaired cognition with verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, and during the last 7 days Resident #3 was taking high-risk drugs which included antipsychotics and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #4) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was exhibiting verbal and physical behaviors did not physically abuse another resident. The findings include: 1. Resident #3 had diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, antisocial personality disorder, conversion disorder with seizures or convulsion, and unspecified dementia with severe anxiety. The 5-day MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eleven (11) indicative of moderately impaired cognition with verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others, and during the last 7 days was taking high-risk drugs that included antipsychotics and antidepressants. The care plan dated 10/14/24 identified that Resident #3 has a potential alteration in mood due to diagnoses of antisocial personality disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, and anxiety with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for one (1) of three (3) residents (Resident #3) reviewed for behaviors, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan with appropriate interventions was implemented for a resident who exhibited physical and verbal behaviors. The findings include: Resident #3 had diagnoses that included paranoid schizophrenia, antisocial personality disorder, conversion disorder, and unspecified dementia with severe anxiety. A physician's order dated 10/1/24 directed to monitor target behavior at the end of each shift marking the frequency and intensity. Review of a nurse's note dated 10/8/24 at 10:45 A.M. written Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 identified she heard yelling coming from Resident #3's room. LPN #5 indicated Resident #3 was cursing to h/herself because h/she lost remote to the television. LPN #5 identified when assisting Resident #3 h/she threatened to kill and strangle her. LPN #5 indicated Resident #3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy and interviews for nine sampled residents (#26, #27, #32, #43, #50, #61, #64, #69, and #376) reviewed for care planning, the facility failed to ensure the interdisciplinary team (IDT) resident care plan meetings were held following comprehensive and quarterly assessments and failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed by the IDT team with resident/family/responsible party involvement. The findings include: 1. Resident #26 admitted in the facility on 7/3/24 with diagnoses that included pericardial effusion, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, orthostatic hypotension, atrial fibrillation, and implantable cardiac defibrillator. The admission MDS assessment should have been completed by 7/17/24 and the comprehensive care plan developed by the interdisciplinary team should have been developed by 7/24/24. Review of Resident #26's clinical record failed to identify that an interdisciplinary team care plan conference meeting inclusive of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of the resident council meeting minutes, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and interviews, the facility failed to respond to concerns identified by the resident council regarding the need to speak with a Social Worker in the facility. The findings include: Review of the Resident Council meeting minutes dated 4/26/24, 5/31/24, 6/28/24, and 7/26/24 identified the expressed wish to speak with the Social Worker and although, there were designated resident council department response forms that were utilized to answer resident council requests, concerns and grievances, there were no resolutions identified to the residents' expressed aspirations and no indication that the social worker had attended any of the meetings to address the requests from the period of 4/26/24 through 7/26/24. The group interview held on 8/22/24 with nine members of resident council identified their on-going concern of wanting to speak with a social worker during their monthly resident council meetings and they further identified that it had been a while since they'd had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    1. Based on observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike, safe, and sanitary environment for two shower rooms on the central and middle unit and for the identified carpeted areas on the central unit. The findings include: Observation of the shower room area on 8/21/24 at 10:16 AM identified two of three shower rooms in the central shower area to have several items stored to include two rolling shower chairs stacked two high, six IV poles, a lounging shower chair, a utility cart, a cardboard box, and a black substance on the ceiling and a shower curtain with holes in it. The third shower room contained two rolling shower chairs. Observation on 8/21/24 at 10:25 AM of the south wing hallway identified several dark brown stains of unknown substance on the carpet. Interview with Resident #61 on 8/21/24 at 11:08 AM identified that she/he had an issue with the shower rooms being so cluttered and that it did not provide a homelike environment. The shower rooms had been like this for some time and was unsure if the two that were cluttered even functioned anymore,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews and interviews for five sample residents (Resident #26, #35, #69, and #376) who required psychosocial support, the facility failed to ensure a Social Worker was available to meet resident needs. The findings include: 1. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pericardial effusion, hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, orthostatic hypotension, atrial fibrillation, and implantable cardiac defibrillator. The RCP dated 7/4/24 identified Resident #26 was at risk for alteration in psychosocial well-being. Care plan interventions directed to encourage communication with visitation, monitor for psychosocial changes, observe and report any changes in mental status caused by situational stress, and provide opportunity to express feelings related to situational stressors. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #26 had intact cognition and required extensive assistance with toileting, hygiene, bed mobility, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility documentation, facility policy and interviews, during a review of the facility antibiotic stewardship program, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's antibiotic surveillance tracking form was completed as directed and failed to ensure that the reports presented at the monthly and quarterly medical staff meetings contained the Antibiotic Stewardship review. The findings include: A review of the Antibiotic Stewardship program for the past two years with the DNS and the Infection Preventionist (RN#2) on 08/27/24 at 10:39 AM identified RN#2 had been the IP since the end of May, beginning of June 2024. The DNS indicated RN#2 had other duties that she is responsible for including weekly IP reports and is able to work remotely to complete these tasks. RN#2 indicated her practice for infection control included surveillance but was unable to show the tracking/surveillance when asked. RN#2 identified Antibiotic stewardship is tracked monthly and used McGeer's criteria to tract they labs are reviewed and checked off in the antibiotic stewardship book but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, facility documentation, and policy for the facility Infection Prevention position, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist had appropriate time to complete IP duties at the facility. The findings included: The Facility Assessment 2023, signed on 1/31/2024, identified RN #2 as the team member holding the Infection Preventionist/Staff Development position. Additionally, the Infection Control section of the Facility Assessment identified the facility conducted an infection control risk assessment yearly, which evaluated and determined the risk or potential vulnerabilities within the resident population and the surrounding community. According to CT Public Act 22-58 identified that each nursing home with more than 60 residents shall employ a full-time Infection prevention and control specialist and that each infection prevention and control specialist worked on a rotating schedule that ensures the specialist covered each eight-hour shift at least once per month. Review of the facility Monthly schedules from May 16th, 2024 through…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #27) reviewed for advance directives, the facility failed to accurately document the resident's life support choices. The acute care Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #27's code status (directs the medical team to administer or withhold life support systems in the event of a cardiac or respiratory arrest) was: full resuscitation (all resuscitative and aggressive curative treatments are provided). Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, dementia, and pneumonia. The Advance Directive form dated 5/2/24 and signed by the Resident #27's Representative and the Physician on 5/3/24 identified Resident #27's options for medical care and treatment were do not resuscitate (DNR) and do not intubate (DNI). Review of physician's orders from 5/2/24 through 8/22/24 directed Resident #27's code status was full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #59) observed for medication administration, the facility failed to ensure that an extended-release medication was not crushed and that a physician's order was in place to administer crushed medications to a resident. The findings include: Resident #59's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, and anxiety. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #59 had severe cognitive impairment, required set up assistance for meals, had no swallowing difficulties and was on a therapeutic diet. The physician's order dated 5/7/24 directed regular diet, regular texture, thin liquids, magic cup every day with Boost (nutritional supplement), aspiration precautions, upright for all meals, set up for all meals, assist of one as needed for initiation. The orders further directed; Metoprolol Succinate tablet extended release 24 hr., 25mg, 1 tab by mouth once a day,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Basedonclinicalrecordreview reviewoffacilitypolicy andinterviewsforoneofthreesampledresidents(Resident#26) reviewedfordischargeplanning thefacilityfailedtodevelopadischargeplaninatimelymanner Thefindingsinclude Resident#26 wasadmitted inthefacilityon7/3/24 withdiagnosesthatincludedpericardialeffusion hypertensiveheartdiseasewithheartfailure orthostatichypotension atrialfibrillation andimplantablecardiacdefibrillator Theinitialcareplandated7/4/24 identifiedthefocusedareaofdischargeplanningwithandinterventiontoevaluateshorttermorlongtermstayplacementandsocialserviceevaluation TheadmissionMDSassessmentdated7/10/24 identifiedResident#26 waswithoutcognitivedeficits andrequiredextensiveassistancefortoileting hygiene bedmobility dressing andtransfers Theassessmentfurtheridentifiedtheresidentreceivedoccupationalandphysicaltherapyandhadadischargeplaninplace Reviewofsocialserviceprogressnotesfrom7/3/24 to8/27/24 failedtoidentifyResident#26 dischargeplanwasdiscussedwiththeresident Interviewon8/26/24 at11:00 AMwithResident#26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility documents, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #69) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide weekend recreation activities. The findings include: Resident #69's diagnoses include cerebral infarction due to embolism, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and adjustment disorder with depressed mood. The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #69 had moderate cognitive impairment, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, utilized set up assistance with eating, and utilized moderate assistance with dressing. It further identified the resident did not have behaviors and it was somewhat important for him/her to read books, listen to music, have access to the news, have access to his/her favorite activities and to be able to experience fresh air. The care plan dated 7/8/24 identified Resident #69 preferred in room activities, with an interventions to offer transport to programs. Interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and review of facility documentation for two of four sampled residents (Resident #1 and #27) reviewed for skin conditions, the facility failed to implement the neurologist's orders for over 3 months and failed to ensure a compression glove ordered for dependent edema and comfort was applied and removed, per the physician's orders. The findings include: 1. Resident #1's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, and skin-picking disorder. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had intact cognition, required set up assistance with eating, oral and personal hygiene, and upper and lower body dressing. The assessment further identified the resident was independent mobility but required supervision or touching assistance with shower transfers. Review of the clinical record identified a neurology consultant's physician's order dated 7/11/2024 that directed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #36) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided during toileting resulting in a fall. The findings include: Resident #36 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, schizoaffective disorder, spinal stenosis, and delusional disorder. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 7/20/23 identified Resident #36 was at risk for falls related to decline in functional mobility. Care plan interventions directed to encourage resident to come and sit at the nurses' station, check wheelchair brakes and instruct on proper use, and provide assistance with toileting. A fall risk assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #36 was not at high risk for falls. The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident # 36 had severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance for toilet transfers, required total assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility policy and procedures, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were not in use and removed from the medication cart, and failed to ensure medications were stored according to the manufacture's recommendation. The findings include: Observation of the South unit's medication cart with LPN #5 on 8/27/24 at 10:10 AM identified an opened bottle of Lorazepam Intensol concentrate 2 milligram/milliliter (mg/ml) containing a label that identified the medication was ordered for Resident #13. The bottle contained 1.75 ml of liquid and contained instructions that the medication should be stored in the refrigerator and once opened should be discarded after 90 days. The bottle was labeled with an opened date of 7/19/24 but did not contain a discard date. Interview with LPN #5 on 8/27/24 at 10:30 AM identified the medication was being administered daily to Resident #13. She further noted that the medication is stored in the refrigerator until it is opened but once it is opened, it is dated and stored in the medication cart, but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy/procedures and interviews, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was utilized by staff and failed to ensure the infection prevention and control policies were reviewed and signed annually. The findings include: 1. Observation on 8/21/24 at 11:52 AM identified LPN #6 performed hand hygiene, donned gloves, and obtained a blood glucose level via glucometer from Resident #35. She then removed her gloves and went into the corridor to discard the used lancet into the sharps container and clean the glucometer with a bleach wipe. Interview with LPN #6 at the time of the observation identified that she forgot to wash her hands following the removal of her gloves and noted that she held the lancet in her ungloved hand because they are not allowed to wear gloves in the corridor. She further noted that the lancet has a safety cover on it. She further noted that she usually brings the treatment cart to the door of the room. Observation on 8/27/24 at 8:02 AM of the medication pass with LPN #7 identified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed ensure the resident was free from mistreatment. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted with diagnoses that included schizoaffective disorder/bipolar (psychiatric/mood disorder) and muscle weakness. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified that Resident #1 was alert and oriented, and was independent for transfers and mobility with a walker. A Resident Dare Plan (RCP) dated 8/3/2023 identified Resident #1 had behavioral symptoms with a potential for altered thought process/adjustment to new situations and was a fall risk due to decline in mobility. Interventions directed to support as needed, maintain a clam environment, calm approach to resident and complete a fall risk assessment quarterly. Record review identified Resident #1 was conserved. Observations identified Resident #1's room was located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-03-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #79) reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter (foley catheter), the facility failed to ensure the Resident Care Plan (RCP) was comprehensive to include the presence and interventions related to the presence of an indwelling urinary catheter. The findings include: Resident #79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and a degenerative disease. Physician orders upon hospital readmission to the facility and dated 2/14/22 directed to provide foley catheter care every shift and change foley catheter as needed for leakage/blockage. A Treatment Medication Administration Record dated 2/14/22 through 3/24/22 identified Resident #79 utilized a foley catheter. A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #79 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of two for bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, and interviews for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #430) reviewed for pressure ulcers, the facility failed to ensure appropriate settings were identified and maintained for an air mattress and failed to ensure Resident #430 was provided off-loading of the heels. The findings include: Resident #430 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pressure induced deep tissue damage of the right heel, pressure ulcer of unspecified site, and osteomyelitis sepsis. Nurse's notes dated 3/2/22 at 8:19 PM indicated Resident #430 had a pressure area to the right heel, right buttock and sacrum, multiple scabs and osteomyelitis to the toe. Nurse's notes dated 3/2/22 at 10:00 PM indicated Resident #430 had an area on the coccyx measuring 3.5 cm by 2.5 cm by 1.5 cm deep and an open area on the right heel measuring 1.5 cm. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 3/2/22 identified a problem of altered health maintenance, having a deep tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled reviewed for weight loss (Resident #30), the facility failed to ensure a resident with special dietary and safety needs had a nutritional assessment in a timely manner and for 1 resident reviewed for hydration (Resident #62), the facility failed to ensure a nutritional assessment was completed quarterly according to facility policy. The findings include: 1. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, and chronic kidney disease stage III. An admission weight dated 6/29/19 identified Resident #30 weighed 115.6 pounds (lbs). A physician's order dated 7/1/19 directed to provide Resident #30 a mechanical soft texture and thin liquids diet, assistance with feeding, the resident should be in upright at 90 degrees for all oral intake and be up for 30 minutes after meals. Additionally, the order directed Resident #30 take small bites and sips, one at a time, and allow extra time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for psychoactive medications (Resident #43 and Resident #73), the facility failed to ensure there was an indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication and target behaviors were not identified or monitored. The finding include: 1. Resident #43 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and chronic kidney disease. An Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) order dated 2/25/18 directed Seroquel (an antipsychotic) 25 mg at bedtime, however, failed to identify the reason Seroquel was ordered. Physician's orders from 2/25/18 to current (9/19/19) renewed the order for Seroquel 25 mg at bedtime. Review of a consultation by the psychologist dated 2/26/18 indicated Resident #43 was appropriate, cooperative, had memory and judgement impairments, diagnosed with dementia and adjustment disorder with mood disturbance (anxiety and depression) with recommendations for individual psychotherapy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-09-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 nourishment refrigerator freezers, the facility failed to intervene when temperatures were out of acceptable range and maintain, clean, or defrost the nourishment refrigerator freezers per the facility policy. The findings include: Observation of the North Unit nourishment room's refrigerator and freezer on 9/17/19 at 9:30 AM identified a thick buildup of ice in the freezer section and spilled juice on the bottom of the refrigerator. A temperature tracking sheet taped to the side of the refrigerator identified the acceptable ranges of temperatures 33-40 degrees Fahrenheit (F). A review of the North Unit nourishment room's refrigerator and freezer temperature tracking logs for June, July, August, and September 2019 identified the temperature were not within the acceptable ranges on 7/10/19 as 31 degrees F, 8/2/19 as 32 degrees F, 8/8/19 as 31 degrees F, 8/9/19 as 31 degrees F, 8/12/19 as 32 F degrees, 8/30/19 as 31 degrees F, 9/16/19 as 29 degrees F, 9/17/19 as 30 degrees F ,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed eating with plastic cutlery (Resident #44), the facility failed to ensure a dignified dining experience and for 1 of 1 sampled residents reviewed for dignity (Resident #56), the facility failed to ensure Resident #56 was treated in a dignified manner. The findings include: 1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, dementia and bipolar disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was moderately cognitively impaired and required supervision, set up with eating and personal care. The Resident Care Plan dated 6/11/19 identified Resident #44 had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit and impaired cognitive function. Interventions included to cue and reorient Resident #44 as needed and provide assistance of one for personal care. An Occupational…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 18 residents reviewed for advance directives (Resident #228), the facility failed to provide documentation of an advance directives and/or ensure physician progress notes accurately reflected Resident #228's code status. The findings include: Resident #228 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, spinal stenosis, diabetes, and malignant neoplasm of the breast. A Facility admission Checklist dated 7/26/19 at 5:00 PM identified advanced directives order and form completed on 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift by RN #1 (but the clinical record failed to include an advanced directive form that had been completed). The Resident Care Plan dated 7/26/19 failed to identify a code status. A physician's verbal order dated 7/26/19 directed Resident #228 as Do Not Resuscitate/DNR. Physician progress notes dated 7/29/19 at 10:10 PM, 7/31/19 at 6:56 PM, and 8/11/19 at 9:59 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for psychoactive medications (Resident #43) the facility failed to ensure the resident care plan was comprehensive for the use of an antipsychotic. The findings include:, Resident #43 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and chronic kidney disease. An Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) order dated 2/25/18 directed Seroquel 25 mg at bedtime, however, failed to identify a corresponding note for the reason Seroquel was ordered. Physician's orders from 2/25/18 to current (9/19/19) renewed the order for Seroquel 25 mg at bedtime. A 8/9/18 psychiatry note identified Resident #43 was started on Celexa (an antidepressant) 10 mg daily. Physician's orders from 2/25/18 to current (9/19/19) renewed the order for Celexa 10 mg daily. The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #43 was moderately cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for accidents and who sustained a fracture, the facility failed to revise the care plan in a timely manner after the resident was injured in the shower. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, and chronic kidney disease stage III. A physician's order dated 6/29/19 directed to provide Resident #30 a shower on Monday's during the day shift. The care plan dated 7/1/19 indicated to provide a sponge bath when a full bath or shower cannot be tolerated by the resident. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance for dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and was totally dependent for bathing. A nurse's note dated 7/22/19 1:39 PM identified Resident #30 had complaints of right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews for 1 of 1 sampled resident reviewed for activities (Resident #24), the facility failed to ensure Resident #24 was able to attend activities of choice. The findings include: Resident #24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and depression. Recreation activity progress notes dated 10/3/18 indicated Resident #24 had been coming to coffee social and sitting with peers, appeared happier, not crying as often, enjoyed staying near writer and talking. Recreation activity notes dated 12/20/18 indicated Resident #24 wanders in and out of programs and activities, once in will stay for a short period of time but preferred to look around and leave, and enjoyed walking around facility and socializing with peers. A Resident Care Plan (RCP) for falls indicated that on 12/22/18 Resident #24 was found on the floor, sent to the hospital and was diagnosed with a left hip fracture. A significant change Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interview for 1 resident (Resident #30) reviewed for accidents and who sustained a fracture, the facility failed to provide care according to physician's orders and/or professional standards of practice. The findings include: Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, and chronic kidney disease stage III. The admission MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #30 had severely impaired cognition, was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder, and required extensive assistance for dressing, eating, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and was totally dependent for bathing. A nurse's note dated 7/22/19 1:39 PM identified Resident #30 had complaints of right arm pain near the elbow with slight swelling and guarding. The resident was seen by the APRN with new orders to obtain right elbow x-ray and administer Tramadol 25mg every 12 hours for pain. The resident representative was made aware. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-09-19 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interviews for 1 resident (Resident #2) reviewed for dialysis, the facility failed to administer medications and fluids according to the physician's orders, and failed to provide ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis provider and the physician, and/or consistently monitor fluid intake/output per physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes diabetes, and end stage renal disease. Physician's order dated 3/7/19 directed to administer Pravastatin (a medication used to treat high cholesterol) 80 mg daily at bedtime. Physician's order dated 6/2/19 directed to obtain a blood pressure and pulse every shift. Physician's order dated 6/3/19 directed to administer Metoprolol (a medication used to treat high blood pressure) 50mg and nephro-vite 0.8mg daily at bedtime. A physician's order dated 7/2/19 directed to administer PhosLo (a medication to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for 2 of 2 medication storage rooms, the facility failed to ensure that medications were dated when opened and/or discarded of when expired. The findings include: 1. Observation of the North Unit medication storage room on [DATE] at 9:30 AM identified an opened bottle of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative Solution (PPD) with a date of [DATE] (112 days ago) written on bottle that was located in the refrigerator. A sign was observed posted in the medication storage room identifying PPD keep stored in refrigerator, date when opened, and discard after 30 days. An interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on [DATE] at 9:30 AM identified the date on the bottle was the date the bottle of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative Solution was opened. 2. Observation of the South Unit medication storage room on [DATE] at 9:40 AM identified an opened bottle of Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative Solution (PPD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy and interview for 1 resident (Resident #56) who had a history of a Multi-Drug Resistant Organism, (MDRO; common bacteria that have developed resistance to multiple types of antibiotics), the facility failed to implement transmission based precautions in a timely manner and/or implement infection control practices according to professional standards. The findings include: Resident #56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (an infection that's become resistant to many antibiotics), and fracture to right humerus. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #56 had intact cognition, was always continent of bowel and bladder, and required limited assistance for dressing, toileting, hygiene and transfers. The care plan dated 6/20/19 included to have Resident #56 transfer to the toilet independently with a rolling walker. Additionally, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-28 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy, and interviews for two of two sampled residents (Resident #35 and #73) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge, the facility failed to provide the required notification of the transfer to the state Ombudsman's office. The findings included: 1. Resident #35's diagnoses included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic osteomyelitis, morbid obesity and cirrhosis of liver. The acute care hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] identified Resident #35 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 5/14/24 with diagnoses of parainfluenza and CRE (Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, a group of bacteria that are difficult to treat and can cause serious infections and was on droplet precautions and also septic shock). A request for the Ombudsman's notice of transfers and/or discharges report for the month of May/2024 was made, but the facility was unable to provide the report. Interview with the Administrator on 8/26/24 at 1:22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-28 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy review, and interviews for 4 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #30, #35, #47, and #376) reviewed for resident assessment, the facility failed to ensure a yearly comprehensive assessment was completed. The findings include: Clinical record review of the following completion of the yearly comprehensive assessment identified: Resident #30 had an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] the deadline for the completion date of the annual comprehensive MDS assessment was 6/3/24 (it should have been completed within 366 days of the last comprehensive assessment); however, the annual comprehensive assessment was not completed as of 8/27/24 making the assessment 85 days late at that point in time. Resident #35 had an annual MDS assessment dated [DATE]; however, the deadline for the completion date of the annual comprehensive MDS assessment was 8/8/24; however, the annual comprehensive assessment was not completed as of 8/27/24 making the assessment 19 days late at that point in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-08-28 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews for 21 of 27 sampled residents (Residents #1, #8, #9, #10, #13, #15, #21, #29, #32, #33, #40, #43, #49, #52, #57, #59, #61, #63, #64, #67, and #68) reviewed for resident assessment, the facility failed to ensure quarterly MDS assessments were completed timely. The findings include: Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] should have been completed by 6/20/24; however, the assessment remained in progress as of 8/27/24 making the completion of the MDS 68 days late as of that date. Resident #8 had a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], which means the next quarterly MDS assessment should have been dated 6/8/24 and completed by 6/22/24; however, the assessment was not completed as of 8/27/24 making it 66 days late as of that date. Resident #9 had a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], which means the next quarterly MDS assessment should have been dated 6/2/24 and completed by 6/16/24; however, the quarterly MDS assessment had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2022-03-24 · tag F0641 — widespread
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation and interview for 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) and for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #79) reviewed for an indwelling urinary catheter, the facility failed to code the Minimum Data Set correctly. The findings include: 1. Resident #28's diagnoses included major anxiety, depression and delusional disorder. Resident #28's PASRR determination dated 5/13/21 identified Resident #28 had a positive Level II with no specialized services. A Social Service note dated 5/21/21 identified Resident #28's PASRR was approved and identified him/her as a positive Level II with no specialized services. A Resident Care Plan dated 5/21/21 identified a focus Level II PASRR with interventions that included to provide mental health and supportive counseling. An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified no cognitive impairment, and Resident #28 required supervision with activities of daily living and was totally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2022-03-24 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment completions and staff interview for 7 of 7 residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6 and Resident #7), the facility failed to ensure discharge MDS' were transmitted. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:20 PM, review of the Discharge MDS identified although the death in facility MDS had been finalized, it had not been transmitted. 2. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:20 PM, review of the Discharge MDS identified the Discharge MDS was still in process and had not been transmitted. 3. Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. On [DATE] at 12:20 PM, review of the Discharge MDS identified as of [DATE] the Discharge MDS was still in process and had not been transmitted. 4. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for 1 resident reviewed for personal property (Resident #44), the facility failed to address a resident's grievance in a timely manner. The findings include: Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease, dementia and bipolar disorder. The annual Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #44 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive one person assistance with personal care. The Resident Care Plan dated 9/11/19 identified Resident #44 had an activity of daily living self-care performance deficit and impaired cognitive function. Interventions included to cue and reorient as needed and provide assist of one for personal care. An interview on 9/17/19 at 10:28 AM with Person #1 (a family member) identified Resident #44's razor cord went missing. The incident had been reported to the Administrator as it was staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2019-09-19 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview for 6 of 22 residents selected for resident assessments (Resident #2, Resident #6, Resident #17, Resident #19 and Resident #30 and Resident #32), the facility failed to ensure resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and/or transmitted and/or submitted per regulatory timeframes. The findings include: 1. Resident #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment reference date (ARD) was 7/4/19, was signed as completed on 9/12/19 and transmitted on 9/17/19 (75 days after the ARD). 2. Resident #6's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment reference date (ARD) was 7/12/19, was signed on 9/12/19 and transmitted on 9/17/19 (67 days after the ARD). 3. Resident #17's annual Minimum Data Set assessment date was 4/21/19, was signed on 6/16/19 and transmitted on 6/19/19 (68 days after the ARD). 4. Resident #19's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment reference date (ARD) was 8/8/19, was signed on 9/17/19 and transmitted on 9/17/19 (40 days after the ARD) 5. Resident #30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ESSENTIAL HEALTHCARE — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 52.5+1.5 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 5 of 54.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
The other 5 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.5★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
LANDA, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF38%since 06/13/2025
LANDA, SARIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF6%since 06/13/2025
SALAMON, MENAJEMIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF44%since 06/13/2025
SALAMON, MORDEJAIIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF7%since 06/13/2025
MAYER, ABRAHAMIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
MAYER, BERRYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
MAYER, MOSHEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
MAYER, YOSSIIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2022
GEWIRTZ, JONATHANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/01/2022
BROWN, NATALIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/25/2025
RAAD, MARCIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
BURG & WEINGARTEN, CPA, PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021
ZELLA HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense10% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 79%Medicare 16%Other / private 5%

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$386per resident / day
operating cost
$11,744per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$382per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Connecticut Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Connecticut
$15,208/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,118/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 075105. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next