Ascension Living Carroll Manor
725 Buchanan St., NE, Washington, DC 20017 · Non profit - Corporation · 252 certified beds · (202) 854-7100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (67) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $167,394 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-16)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.2% | 20.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 5.3% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.3% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 1.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.8% | 6.4% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.4% | 1.1% | 3.3% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.1% | 16.8% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.2% | 97.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.5% | 7.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.6% | 8.0% | 17.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 0.8% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 73.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 15.0% | 18.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.0% | 8.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.42 | 1.25 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.87 | 0.55 | 1.80 | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
30.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 162 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 132 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 30.4%CMS range 24.2–37.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.5%CMS range 7.9–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 52.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 94.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.8%CMS range 3.1–8.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 252 beds and averages 163.5 residents a day — about 65% occupied, or roughly 88 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.24 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.00 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.49 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.35 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
67 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 52 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to maintain a safe and comfortable environment by not ensuring facility temperatures ranged from 71 to 81 Fahrenheit. As evidenced by four (4) of four residents who had respiratory diagnoses and/or were prescribed oxygen therapy, whose room temperatures ranged from 82 - 90 Fahrenheit after the facility staff turned off the HVAC system for repair. (Residents #1, #4, #196, and #199) The findings included: According to the Weather Channel, on June 10, 2026, the temperature in the District of Columbia ranged between 73 and 90 Fahrenheit. https://weather.com/weather/monthly/l/c4025fdf0177c872b7fc2e0d09e7c523995ef49e21145e2d2438fe08649ca9e81. Resident#1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had multiple active diagnoses, including Pulmonary Embolism without Acute Cor Pulmonale.An admission Minimum Date Set assessment dated [DATE] documented, in part, that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score of 15,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, resident and staff interviews, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that adequate supervision was provided, in accordance with Resident #1's person-centered plan of care, to prevent her from eloping from a safe area, without authorization. Subsequently, Resident #1 eloped from the secure Memory Care unit on 02/21/26 at 11:45 AM. During this survey, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ-J) was identified at 42 CFR 483.25, Quality of Care, F689, Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices on 03/18/26 at 1:12 PM. The facility's Administrator submitted an abatement plan to the Survey Team that was accepted on 03/18/26 at 5:27 PM. The Survey Team verified implementation of the abatement plan while onsite and the immediacy was lifted on 03/24/26 at 3:38 PM. After removal of the immediacy, the deficient practice was lowered to a scope and severity level of D.The findings included: Review of the facility's Elopement and Wandering Residents last reviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, video footage, staff interviews, and the resident's interview, for two (2) of 50 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to: adequately supervise Resident #165 while the resident sat in the nurse's station on the evening of 06/28/24. Subsequently, the resident eloped through the loading dock door in the facility's basement. On 06/29/24, the police located the resident near a police station (approximately 5.1 miles from the facility). After being evaluated at a hospital, the resident returned to the facility that same day; and (2) ensure Resident #48 was adequately supervised while wearing facility-provided oversize non-skid socks. Subsequently, the resident had a fall with injury (occipital hematoma) on 09/02/24 (Resident #165 and #48). These failures resulted in an immediate jeopardy situation. The immediate jeopardy was identified on September 25, 2024, at 11:50 AM. The facility provided a plan of action to address the immediacy on September 25, 2024 at 5:29 PM and it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · H2026-06-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent the development and progression of pressure ulcers (bedsores) for two (2) of two residents who developed pressure ulcers that were first observed at advanced stages Residents # 150 and #87. 1. Resident #150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Fracture of First Lumbar Vertebra, Abnormalities of Gait Mobility, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. An admission nursing progress note dated 04/09/26 at 6:06 PM documented in part, Resident is alert, oriented and verbally responsive. She's able to make his [her] needs known. Respiration is even and unlabored with no signs of respiratory distress. Skin is warm to touch, redness and dryness noted towards perineal, right groin and sacral area. Nursing staff will continue with the current plan of care, she remains in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide supervision, monitoring and modification of the residents plan of care to decrease the resident ' s risk for falls. Resident #51, who had a history of falls with injury, sustained another subsequent fall with injury. The findings included: Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record revealed the resident had multiple diagnoses including Dementia, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Wandering, History of Falling, Left Artificial Hip Joint, Fracture of Neck of Left Femur and Age-Related Physical Debility. Review of the medical record revealed the following: 04/15/2021 at 2:37 AM [Nursing Supervisor Note] .I saw the resident sitting on the floor in front of her room .Resident complained of severe pain in her left hip .The resident is alert to herself but confused .We did not move or turn the resident from the floor .MD (medical doctor) said to send resident ot [to] hospital for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify the resident and resident representative of the discharge in writing and in a manner they understood at least 30 days in advance of the discharge. Resident #195. The findings included: A facility policy titled 'Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for' with a next review date of 01/2027 documented, in part: When a resident is scheduled for transfer or discharge, the social worker, or designee, will notify nursing services of the transfer or discharge so that appropriate procedures can be implemented and This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his her family, at least twenty-four (24) hours before the resident's discharge or transfer from the facility and Nursing services is responsible for: 1. Obtaining orders for discharge. Resident #195 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to ensure that a resident's PASSAR II referral was completed within 30 days of admission for one (1) of 53 sampled residents. (Resident #150). The findings included:Resident #150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Unspecified Psychosis, Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder.A review of the resident's medical record revealed a PASSAR I form dated 04/09/26 that failed to capture that the resident had a history of a serious mental illness. Additionally, the form was incomplete and failed to document if a referral for a PASSAR II was necessary. A care plan dated 04/09/26 documented, Problem- Level II PASARR is not needed. Goal-[Resident's Approach (Intervention)-Level II PASSAR is not needed.During a face-to-face interview at approximately 12PM on 06/01/26, Employee #4 (Director of Social Work) stated that the PASSAR I form dated 04/09/26 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to fully implement the care plan interventions for a Resident who had an unwitnessed fall and failed to develop a care plan to manage an unstageable pressure ulcer for one resident. Residents #146 and #150. 1. Resident #150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Fracture of First Lumbar Vertebra, Abnormalities of Gait Mobility, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care. A Skin Evaluation Form dated 04/23/26 at 7:25 PM documented in part, Left Buttocks DTI (Deep Tissue Injury) unstageable 30% skin, 20% slough, 50% dermis. Treatment-Cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply silver alginate, [and] cover with Optifoam. Occurred where: [NAME] Manor Nursing and Rehab Center [Ascension Health]. Size: length 8.0 cm, width 2.0 cm, depth not applicable. A physician order dated 04/24/26 instructed in part,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility's staff failed to follow up with a resident's physician for cataract surgery for one (1) of 53 residents.(Resident #157)The findings included:Resident #157 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Cataracts of Right and Left Eye, Dry Eyes, and Hypertension Retinopathy.A progress note dated 08/25/25 at 4:01 PM documented in part, Resident came back from her appointment with Dr. [NAME]. She was seen for a chief complaint of follow-up ocular hypertension involving the left eye and right. The symptoms are associated with blurred vision and are mild in severity. [Physician's name] recommended that resident should go to [local hospital] Ophthalmology for cataract evaluation.A progress note dated 09/29/25 at 12:55 PM documented in part, Resident left.facility for cataract evaluation.[Physician's name] recommended eye surgery at [hospital's name].A care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to wash and sanitize chinaware plates and silverware properly; and failed to ensure that supplements were not stored beyond the 'use by' date for for 17 of 24 Ensure supplements observed expired. The findings included: 1. During an observation of the dishwashing process in the main kitchen at approximately 4 PM on 06/15/26, it was revealed that six (6) of 21 chinaware plates, three (3) of 3 forks, three (3) of 25 spoons, and one (1) of 10 knives were not properly sanitized as evidenced by food particles remaining on the eating surface of the previously mentioned chinaware plates and eating utensils after they had been washed and sanitized. During a face-to-face interview at approximately 4:30 PM on 06/15/28, Employee #11 (Dietary Manager) stated that the staff would rewash and sanitize the plates and eating utensils. 2. During an observation conducted on 05/28/26 at approximately 12:40 PM of the Second-Floor medication storage room, it revealed an opened case of Ensure supplement drinks with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-16 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 53 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to evaluate a Resident for occupational therapy services per the physician's order. Residents #146.The findings included: Resident #146 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Unspecified Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4, Chronic Embolism and Thrombosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Shortness of Breath, and Retention of Urine, Localized Edema, and Unsteadiness on Feet. On 05/13/26, the State agency and the facility received a Complaint (3012416) via email from Resident #146's family member and the Resident's legal guardian, which documented in part: Since May 4th, my mother has made multiple requests for a return call from the [Name of Facility's Medical Team] .our request to speak directly with a physician or nurse practitioner has gone unanswered . An email response to the State agency dated 05/15/26 from the Facility's Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on record review and interview, for two (2) of 53 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure: (1) Resident #150's record contained accurate documentation related to the staging of her wound. (2) Resident #179's record contained accurate documentation of skin sheets. (Residents #150 and #179)The findings included: 1. Resident #150 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Fracture of First Lumbar Vertebra, Abnormalities of Gait Mobility, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Need for Assistance with Personal Care.The policy Procedure: Pressure Injury Assessment/Treatment with a review date of 01/26 documented in part, There are four stages of pressure injury.Stage 1 -skin remains intact at this stage. Intact skin with a localized area of non-bleachable erythema.Stage 2-partial thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis. The wound bed is pink or red, moist.An admission nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that they followed Resident #1's physician's order to not be assigned a male Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA.The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included Dementia, Congestive Heart Failure, Hypertension and Age Related Macular Degeneration. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A physician's order dated 07/28/24 that directed, Per resident request - every shift, no male CNA. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff coded: a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognitive status; required supervision or touching assistance for personal hygiene. Review of the nursing assignment sheets and CNA documentation from 02/01/26 to 03/18/26 showed that a male CNA was assigned to and documented that they provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident's food plan was followed and met her nutritional needs and preferences. This was evident for 1 of 3 sampled residents (#13). The findings included: A review of Resident #13's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Status Post Reverse Arthroplasty of Left Shoulder, Asthma, Hypertension and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. A Physician's Order Reconciliation dated 11/02/25 documented, in part: Medicinal Allergies: Shellfish Derived. A History and Physical dated 11/03/25 documented in part, Allergies: Shellfish. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented: facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of '15,' indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A care plan dated 12/24/25 documented, in part: Nutritional Status: [Resident #13's name] has risk of altered nutrition status .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to provide a resident with food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, appearance, and that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This was evident for 1 of 3 resident sampled. (Resident #13) The findings included: A review of a facility policy titled Resident Food Services, Resident Meal Service with a revised date of January 2024 documented, part: Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced, attractive meal, at a safe and appetizing temperature that meets their daily nutritional needs. A review of Resident #13's medical record revealed Resident #13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Status Post Reverse Arthroplasty of Left Shoulder, Asthma, Hypertension and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. A History and Physical dated 11/03/25 documented in part, Allergies: Shellfish. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 52 citations
- Potential for harm · F2024-09-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety based on the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ). The census on the first day of the survey was 175. The findings included: During a Resident Council meeting on 08/27/24, residents complained of low staffing on the weekends causing a delay in getting activities of daily living (ADL) care and services. One resident stated, It's a ghost town in here. Another resident stated, There's hardly any staff here. When I call, they eventually come. They aren't deliberately taking their time, it's just not enough staff to go around. Review of the staffing data submitted via the PBJ system revealed that the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for quarter 2, 01/01/24 to 03/31/24. Review of the staffing for weekends dates of 01/12/24 - 01/15/24, 02/02/24 - 02/04/24, 03/12/24 - 03/15/24, and 03/29/24 - 03/31/24 revealed that the facility failed to provide sufficient nurse staffing creating the risk for the potential for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-09-25 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review and staff interviews, for one (1) out of 50 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies, and skill sets necessary to meet resident needs; and for failed to ensure that licensed nurses met the professional standards of quality for medication administration in three (3) out of seven (7) observations. Resident #64. The findings included: According to the manufacturer's instructions: - BREO (inhaler medication used to treat Asthma/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease/COPD) can cause serious side effects, including fungal infection in your mouth or throat (thrush). Rinse your mouth with water without swallowing after using BREO to help reduce your chance of getting thrush. - If you are using other inhalers at the same time, wait at least 1 minute between the use of each medication.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that the established a system for the reconciliation of controlled medications was followed. The findings included: Review of the facility's Controlled Substances policy dated 06/2022 documented: - An individual resident-controlled substance record is made for each resident's medication. - This record contains information to include name of resident, name and strength of the medication, time of administration and signature of nurse administering the medication. - The associate administering medications, who confirmed count at the start of the shift, will maintain the keys to controlled substance. Keys are passed from associate to associate at the time of count. - Associates are to count controlled mediations at the end of each shift. The associate coming on duty and the associate going off duty are to make count together. 1. During a controlled substance reconciliation on the 5th floor, of medication cart 2, with Employee # 8 (LPN) on 08/25/24 at 6:03 AM, it was observed that the [Facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to store and distribute foods under sanitary condition as evidenced by food items such as one (1) of one (1) container of mashed potatoes, and one (1) of one (1) open pack of yellow cheese that were not labeled or dated in the walk-in refrigerator, one (1) of one (1) container of pineapple chunks, one (1) of one container of blueberries, and one (1) of one (1) container of canned peaches, that were expired in the walk-in refrigerator, two (2) of two (2) convection ovens that were in need of cleaning, and inadequate breakfast food temperatures from the second floor kitchen. The findings include: 1.Cooked food such as mashed potatoes and ready-to-eat food such as an open pack of yellow cheese stored in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator were not labeled or dated. 2.Ready-to-eat foods such as a container of pineapple chunks, a container of blueberries, and a container of canned peaches were stored beyond their expiration dated of August 21, and August 24, 2024, in the walk-in refrigerator. 3.Two (2) of two (2) convection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-25 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, facility staff failed to store and distribute foods under sanitary condition as evidenced by food items such as one (1) of one (1) container of mashed potatoes, and one (1) of one (1) open pack of yellow cheese that were not labeled or dated in the walk-in refrigerator, one (1) of one (1) container of pineapple chunks, one (1) of one container of blueberries, and one (1) of one (1) container of canned peaches, that were expired in the walk-in refrigerator, two (2) of two (2) convection ovens that were in need of cleaning, and three (3) of seven (7) hot food items that tested below 140 degrees Fahrenheit (°) during a food temperature assessment on the second floor kitchen on August 25, 2024. The findings include: 1.Cooked food such as mashed potatoes and ready-to-eat food such as an open pack of yellow cheese stored in one (1) of one (1) walk-in refrigerator were not labeled or dated. 2.Ready-to-eat foods such as a container of pineapple chunks, a container of blueberries, and a container of canned peaches were stored beyond their expiration date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews for one (1) of 50 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to notify a resident's physician of the need to start treatment for a resident rash with newly opened lesions. Resident #19. The findings included: Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Unilateral Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Lymphedema, Presence of Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator, Diabetes Mellitus, and Difficulty in Walking. An observation on 08/27/24 at 01:33 PM showed Resident #19 lying on his back in bed. The bed linen was pulled up to the resident ' s chest with his upper extremities exposed. A rash with clusters of dry, intact blackhead pimples/lesions was on the resident's outer left upper extremity. During a face-to-face interview on 08/27/24 at 01:33 PM, the resident stated that a rash was also on his outer right thigh. He added that the rashes had been on his arm and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interview, the facility's staff failed to follow its Abuse policy regarding notifying the State Survey Agency immediately but no later than two hours of learning of an incident of abuse or neglect. In addition, the facility's staff failed to evaluate the resident's elopement risk 7 days after admission as per its Elopement policy. Subsequently, the resident had an elopement incident on 06/28/24. The findings included: Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include Major Depression, Syncope, and Disorientation. 1.The Abuse Prevention policy with a revision date of 06/20 documented in part, Neglect-means the failure of the community, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain mental anguish or emotional distress .Investigation-the community will investigate and report any allegations of abuse [neglect] within timeframes as required by federal,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to notify the State Survey Agency of the elopement (neglect) of a resident on 06/28/24 immediately or within two hours of the occurrence. As evidenced by a State Survey Agency Facility Reported Incident form (DC~12936) that documented notification occurred at 3:34 AM on 06/29/24 (6 hours after staff first learned of the incident). The findings included: The Abuse Prevention Policy with a revision date of 06/20 documented in part, Neglect-means the failure of the community, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain mental anguish or emotional distress .Investigation-the community will investigate and report any allegations of abuse [neglect] within timeframes as required by federal, state, and local requirements . Resident #165 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include Major Depression, Syncope, and Disorientation. A State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews for one (1) of 50, the facility staff failed to provide written notification to a resident, their representative, or the Ombudsman of the reasons for the resident ' s discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. Resident #425. The findings included: 1.) Resident #425 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Adult Failure to Thrive, Atrial Fibrillation, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, and Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of Resident #425 ' s medical record revealed the following: A face sheet that showed that Resident #425 had a representative. A review of Resident # 425 ' s admission record showed that the Resident had no hospital admissions from 01/30/23 until 04/03/24. A physician's order dated 04/03/24 at 11:18 AM directed: Send pt (patient) to ED (Emergency Department) via 911 for AMS (altered mental status) AFTT (Adult failure to thrive). A Resident Transfer Form dated 04/03/24 at 12:24:18 PM by Employee # /LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, for one (1) of 50 sampled residents facility staff failed to provide written notification of its bed hold policy and the number of bed hold days available to a resident who transferred from the facility to the hospital. Resident #425. The findings included: 1.) Resident #425 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Metabolic Encephalopathy, Adult Failure to Thrive, Atrial Fibrillation, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, and Chronic Kidney Disease. A review of Resident #425 ' s medical record revealed the following: A face sheet showed that Resident #425 had a representative. A review of Resident # 425 ' s admission record showed that the Resident had no hospital admissions from 01/30/23 until 04/03/24. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #425 dated 03/26/24, revealed that facility staff coded the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Summary Score was 5, indicating that the resident had severely impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview for one (1) of 50 sampled residents, facility staff failed to code a resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment accurately for diagnoses of Depression and Anxiety. Resident #104. The finding includes: 1.) Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: anxiety disorder unspecified; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, Psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; Major depressive recurrent. moderate; Major depressive disorder, single episode, severe without psychotic features; Paranoid personality. A review of Resident#104 's medical record showed the following: A review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed no check mark documented in the boxes in Section G Active Diagnosis allotted for Anxiety Disorder and Depression. Both boxes next to Anxiety Disorder and Depression were left blank indicating not coded. The evidence showed that facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview facility staff failed to update a resident's care plan with new goals and interventions following an allegation of resident-to-resident verbal abuse for two (2) residents. Residents' #27 and #132. The findings included: 1.) Resident #27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Traumatic Hip Fracture, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 and Atrial Fibrillation. A review of Resident #27's medical record revealed: A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented: facility staff coded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of '12,' indicating the resident was moderately impaired; Functional Abilities and Goals that documented: Setup or clean-up assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), bed mobility, sit to stand, Chair/bed-to-chair transfer, toilet transfer and Walk 10 feet; uses a wheelchair for locomotion on and off the unit. A care plan dated 04/05/24 documented, Psychosocial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review and staff interviews, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of quality in three (3) out of seven (7) medication administration observations. The findings included: According to the National Institute of Health (NIH): - It is standard during nursing education to receive instruction on a guide to clinical medication administration and upholding patient safety known as the 'five rights' or 'five R's' of medication administration. -Right patient- means ascertaining that the patient being treated is, in fact, the correct recipient for whom medication was prescribed. This is best practiced by nurses directly asking a patient to provide his or her full name aloud (if appropriate), checking medical wristbands for matching name and ID number as on a chart. - Depending on the unit that a patient may be in, some patients, may not wear wristbands or may have altered mentation to the point where they are unable to identify themselves correctly. In these instances, nurses are advised to confirm a patient's identity through alternative means with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews for (one) 1 of 50 sampled residents the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, for using a full body sling (Hoyer) lift to transfer a resident from the resident ' s bed to the resident ' s wheelchair. Subsequently, the resident had a fall with injuries during a transfer. Resident #19. The findings included: The Food and Drug Administration ' s document entitled, Patient Lifts Safety Guide, recommended the following: Most lifts require two or more caregivers to safely operate lift and handle patient. (https://www.fda.gov/files/medical%20devices/published/Patient-Lifts-Safety-Guide.pdf) The Occupational Safety and Health (OSHA), Guidelines for Nursing Homes, under the section entitled: ' Identifying Problems and Implementing Solutions for Resident Lifting and Repositioning, ' recommended the following: For transfers to and from: Chair to Stretcher /(Same as Bed) [Figure 3.] .Can…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews for one (1) of 50, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident received proper treatment to maintain vision by failing to assist the resident with scheduling an ophthalmology appointment. Resident #55 The findings included: Resident #55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Non- Traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Renal Insufficiency, Diabetes Mellitus, and Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis. An observation on 08/28/24 at 2:03 PM showed Resident #55 sitting in his wheelchair beside his bed in his room with the lights turned off. When asked if he had any problems with his vision, the resident stated that he had difficulty seeing. He added that he could recall when his last eye appointment was, and he needed an appointment with the ophthalmologist. He further added, that he wears glasses and had them at one time, but did not know what happened to them. A review of Resident #55 ' s medical record revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and staff interviews, for one (1) of 50 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was assessed for pain management as per a physician order and professional standard of practice. (Resident #81). Findings included: According to National Institute of Health (NIH): - Assessment of pain is a critical step to providing good pain management. - Nurses working with patients with acute pain must select the appropriate elements of assessment for the current clinical situation. - The most critical aspect of pain assessment is that it is done on a regular basis (e.g., once a shift, every 2 hours) using a standard format. The assessment parameters should be explicitly directed. - To meet the patients' needs, pain should be reassessed after each intervention to evaluate the effect and determine whether modification is needed. The time frame for reassessment also should be directed. - Pain assessment should include intensity, location, and quality. - Pain assessment should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for two (2) of 50 sampled residents the facility's staff failed to: ensure the pharmacist conducted a resident's monthly medication regimen; and provide documented evidence that a resident's medication irregularities identified by the pharmacist were reviewed and provide the rationale for not changing a resident ' s medication. (Residents #19 and #157) The findings included: A review of the Medication Regimen Review Nursing policy with a review date of 09/23 documented in part, The medication regimen of each resident is reviewed by a licensed pharmacist according to fedreal, stated, and local regulations . 1.Resident #157 was admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnose including Vascular Dementia, Anxiety, Agitation, Unspecified Mood Disorder, and Paranoid Personality Disorder, Vitamin B Deficiency, Hypercholesterolemia, Chronic Back Pain. A review of a physician's order dated 11/22/23 instructed, Folic Acid 1mg (milligram) tablet po (by mouth) QD (every day) for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five (5) percent or greater. The findings included: Seven (7) medication administration observations were conducted at the facility from 08/25/24 through 08/27/24. The total number of errors observed were four (4) out 31 opportunities, for error which equates to a medication error rate of 12.9%. During a telephone interview on 09/05/24 at approximately 2:30 PM, these findings were brought to the attention of Employee #1 (Administrator) and Employee #12 (Assistant Director of Nursing/ADON). The employees acknowledged the findings and made no additional comments. Cross Reference F658 and F726
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure that medications and biologicals, that were stored for use, were not expired and failed to ensure that medications were properly stored. The findings included: 1. During an observation of the 5th floor clean supply room on [DATE] at 6:16 AM, fourteen (14) Mesalt dressing packets (used to treat wounds with heavy discharge) were noted stored for use that had an expiration date of [DATE]. During a face-to-face interview at the time of the observation, Employee #8 (LPN) stated, Distribution department is responsible for stocking this room. 2. During an observation of the 2nd floor medication refrigerator on [DATE] at 7:00 AM, two (2) Pneumovax vaccines were stored for use that had an expiration date of [DATE]. During a face-to-face interview at the time of the observation, Employee #10 (LPN) stated, All nurses are responsible for checking the expiration date of the medications in the fridge. I did not check for any expiration dates for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and resident and staff interviews for one (1) of 50, the facility staff failed to assist a resident with obtaining an appointment with the dentist for Resident #19. The findings included: A review of the facility ' s Dental Services policy approved on 01/2024 documented: 1. Oral health services are available to meet the resident ' s needs. 2. Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to our residents Resident #19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Unilateral Primary Generalized Osteoarthritis, Lymphedema, Presence of Automatic Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator, Diabetes Mellitus, and Difficulty in Walking. A review of Resident #19 ' s medical record revealed the following: An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident#19 as having a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. A care plan initiated on 09/30/21 documented, Category: Dental Care: [First Name of Resident #19]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on a review of the facility's records and a staff interview, the facility failed to comply with the State Regulation (22B DCMR sect. 3211.5) for daily staffing ratios,as evidenced by not providing the minimum daily average of four and one tenth (4.1) hours of direct nursing care per resident per day, with at least six tenths (0.6) hours being provided by a registered nurse for 12 of 12 sampled days. The findings included: A review of the facility's daily staffing sheets revealed the following: On 10/16/24 the facility's resident census was 182. In addition, residents received 3.5 hours of direct nursing care with .35 of those hours being provided by a registered nurse. On 10/18/24 the facility's resident census was 184. In addition, residents received 3.4 hours of direct nursing care with .26 of those hours being provided by a registered nurse. On 10/19/24 the facility's resident census was 184. In addition, residents received 3.1 hours of direct nursing care with .21 of those hours being provided by a registered nurse. On 10/20/24 the facility's resident census was 184. In…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interview, facility staff failed to ensure that infection control policies and procedures were reviewed annually. The findings included: Review of the Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policy last approved 05/2023 documented: - The IPCP is based on the Facility Assessment and is reviewed annually and as needed. Review of the Infection Preventionist Policy dated 07/2023 documented: - The infection Preventionist is responsible for coordinating the implementation and updating of our established infection control policies and practices. Review of the Infection Prevention and Control Committee policy last approved on 01/2024 documented - Meet at least quarterly. - Functions: develop, recommend, review and set policies specific to infection prevention and control practices During a review of the facility's infection control policies and procedures on 08/26/24 at 2:40 PM, the following policies and procedures were noted to not have been reviewed within the last year: - Transmission-Based Precautions, last approved 05/2023, next review due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, for one (1) out of 50 sampled residents, facility staff failed to have documented evidence that they provided a resident or the resident's representative education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 booster vaccine to either consent or refuse the immunization. Resident #160. The findings included: Resident #160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia and Type 2 Diabetes. Review of the resident's medical record revealed the following: A face sheet that showed the resident had legal guardian. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showed that facility staff documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognitive status. During an observation of Resident #160 on 08/26/24 by the survey team, it was noted that the resident had audible wheezing and nasal congestion. The survey team alerted facility staff. Upon testing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, and comfortable environment, as evidenced by privacy curtains that were hanging loose, detached from curtain hooks, in 75 of 192 residents' rooms. The findings include: During an environmental tour of the facility on May 19, 2023, between 9:15 AM and 11:30 AM, privacy curtains in residents' rooms were hanging loose off curtain tracks, and detached from curtain hooks on all occupied floors. The observations included: -Fifth floor: 35 of 48 residents' rooms; -Fourth floor: 18 of 48 resident's rooms; -Third floor: unoccupied; -Second floor: 17 of 48 residents' rooms; -First floor: five (5) of 48 residents' rooms. These observations were acknowledged by Employee #11 during a face-to-face interview on May 19, 2023, at approximately 2:00 PM.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for two (2) out of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to provide notification to resident representatives that included the facility's bed hold policy or the number of bed hold days available for each Resident when they transferred to the hospital. (Resident #94 and #139) 1. Resident #94 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Cerebral Infarct, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Altered Mental Status, Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Age-Related Cognitive Decline. A review of Resident #94's medical record showed a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] showing that the Resident had severely impaired cognition, exhibited trouble falling asleep or sleeping too much for 2-6 days poor appetite or overeating for 7-11 days, required extensive assistance for assisted daily living skills, (transfers. Eating, grooming, toileting, personal hygiene). A Nurses Note on 04/18/23 at 8:55 AM documented, .around 10:00 am resident('s) son came…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to have documented evidence that residents' representatives were provided with a copy of the Base Line Care Plan for two (2) of 41 sampled residents (Residents #28 and #323). Findings included: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Abnormalities of Gait Mobility, Repeated Falls, Pain in Right Hip, Sever Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. and Dementia. A review of Resident #28's face-sheet showed the resident had a legal guardian. A review of the resident's medical record revealed a baseline care plan dated 02/13/23. However, review of the progress notes from 02/13/23 to 02/23/23 lacked documented evidence that Resident #28's representative received a copy of the previously mentioned Baseline Care Plan. 2. Resident #323 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Vascular Dementia, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus, and Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 . A review of Resident #323's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 41 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to develop person-centered care plans with goals and interventions to address (1) a resident's choking incident, (2) a resident's recent right femur (hip) fracture and (3) a resident who had a UTI. (Residents #20, #28, and #139). The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to update a care plan for a resident that included Resident #139's dysphagia and risk for aspiration after choking in the facility's first-floor dining room on 04/03/23. Resident #139 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alcohol Dependence with Alcohol-Induced Dementia, Delusional Disorders, Personal History of Other Mental and Behavioral Disorder, and Restlessness and Agitation. A review of Resident #139's medical record showed: A Nurses Note dated 04/02/23 at 4: 49 PM documented: During lunchtime, around 12:50 pm, I was in the dining room serving residents their meal and sitting with other residents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews for three (3) out of 41 residents, facility staff failed to update and revise person-centered care plans. (Residents #6, #375 and #35). The findings included: 1.Facility staff failed to update and revise the interventions on a Resident's person-centered care plan after the Resident had a second fall and sustained an injury. Resident #6. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Heart Failure, Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Volume Overload, and Generalized Muscle Weakness. A Nurse's Note dated 03/28/23 at 3:41 pm documented: .At 11:30 nurse was called to [Resident #6's room] by assigned Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) that [Name of Resident #6] is on the floor. The nurse went to [pronoun] room and found Resident in a sitting position, leaning back on the commode .RN and nurse assessed the Resident; no apparent injury was noted .The Resident was encouraged to use the call light to call for help A Nurse's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, facility staff failed to adequately monitor and provide supervision to a Resident who was a smoker. Resident #136. Resident #136 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarct, Atrial Fibrillation, Essential Hypertension, Abnormal Levels of Serum Enzymes, and Anxiety Disorders. A review of Resident #136's medical record revealed the following: A Hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] that documented Discharge Diagnosis: Smoking Hx (History) .Hospital Course: History of cigarette smoking- Nicotine patch d/c discharge as patient refusing . An admission assessment dated [DATE] at 7:51 pm documented that the Resident had no desire to smoke: .Smoking Evaluation: Resident desires to smoke(?): No. Of note, Resident #136's medical record lacked documented evidence that facility staff conducted any subsequent smoking evaluations/assessments for the Resident after admission. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-30 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to obtain physician orders that include the resident ' s use of continuous oxygen therapy. Resident #143. Findings included: Resident #143 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Heart Failure, Pulmonary Hypertension, Respiratory Failure, Hyperlipidemia, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Dementia. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] showed that under Section C [Cognition] resident is coded as 7 to indicate severely impaired cognition. Review of the pulmonary Critical Care Associates consultation report dated 04/20/2023 at 12:18 PM showed Very elderly woman brought from [facility name] in wheelchair without oxygen alert, conversant, breathing regularly; lungs good airflow. A/P [action/plan] Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD], use face mask for nebulizer machine and for inhalers for better delivery.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and staff interviews for one (1) of four (4) nursing units, the facility staff failed to ensure the system used for an acceptable standard of practice to account for the receipt, usage, disposition, and reconciliation of controlled medications was being followed by staff. Findings included . Review of the Controlled Drug Shift Change Audit Sheet on unit #5 on the fifth floor showed that the controlled drugs (scheduled II to schedule V) system that is to be counted by two nurses at the change of shift, the nurse going off duty and the nurse coming on was not being followed. Further Review of the Controlled Drug Shift Change Audit Sheet showed the spaces allotted for nurse signature going off duty and coming on duty to reconcile the narcotic count for the 3:00 PM to 11:00 PM shift on the following dates was done by the same nurses signatures on the folowing dates and shift. 05/13/2023 3p -11p 05/14/2023 3p-11p 05/17/2023 3p-11p 05/19/2023 3p-11p The evidence showed that the system used for acceptable standard of practice to account for the receipt, usage,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to store and prepare foods in accordance with professional standards of practice for food services safety as evidenced by eight (8) of nine (9) four-inch-deep soiled bullet pans and two (2) of five (5) two-inch deep soiled bullet pans stored on a ready-for-use shelf, one (1) of one (1) six-pound, four-ounces can of Sysco Fancy Shredded Sauerkraut labeled with a best-by date of October 2022, six of six (6) six-pound, four-ounces cans of Jalapeno slices with a best-by date of January 21, 2023, and fire sprinkler blow off caps that were soiled with grease and/or foreign substances. The findings include: During a walkthrough of the facility's kitchen on May 16, 2023, at approximately 9:00 AM, the following observations were made: 1. Eight (8) of nine (9) four-inch-deep bullet pans and two (2) of five (5) two-inch deep bullet pans stored in the designated clean, and ready for use area of the kitchen, were stained throughout. 2. One (1) of one (1) six-pound, four-ounces can of Sysco Fancy Shredded Sauerkraut stored in dry…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview for one (1) of 41 sampled residents, facility staff failed to maintain accurate documentation in a resident's medical record as evidenced by not completing the physician's tube feeding order at the time ordered to take it down. (Resident #50) The findings included: Resident #50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Metabolic Encephalopathy, Adult Failure to Thrive, Gastrostomy Status, Dysphagia, Malignant Neoplasm of Major Salivary Gland, Flaccid Hemiplegia of Right Side, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension. A Physician's Order dated 12/03/22 documented Glucerna 1.5 @ 40 ml/hr x 10 hrs (40 milliliter per hour for 10 hours) to provide 400ml (milliliter) total volume, 600kcal (kilocalories), 33g (grams) pro (protein), 303ml (milliliter) free H2O (water) Up @ (at) 8:00PM and Down @ (at) 06:00 (6:00AM) - Every Day for Nutritional Support. A Care Plan dated 12/06/21 documented, .EATING: on G-tube feeding . A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to maintain the call bell system in good working condition as evidenced by call bells in two (2) of 43 resident's rooms that failed to initiate an alarm when tested. The findings include: During an environmental tour of the facility on May 22, 2023, at approximately 2:00 PM, call bells in two (2) of 48 resident's rooms (#129, #455) did not alarm when tested. These breakdowns could prevent or delay staff from responding to residents' needs in a timely manner. These observations were acknowledged by Employee #13 during a face-to-face interview on May 25, 2023, at approximately 11:00 AM.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable environment as evidenced by a dome cover that was missing from one (1) of 10 ceiling lights in the fifth floor dining room, dome covers that were missing from two (2) of nine (9) ceiling lights in the second floor dining room, a dome cover that was missing from one (1) of 10 ceiling lights in the first floor dining room, two (2) stained ceiling tiles in the Activity's room on the fifth floor, one (1) of eight (8) electrical outlets in the second floor dining room that lacked an outside cover, low water temperatures in 10 of 47 resident's rooms, and missing dresser knobs from one (1) of 47 resident's rooms. The findings included: During an environmental walkthrough of the facility on 07/21/2021 and 07/22/2021, the following was observed: 1. One (1) of 10 ceiling light dome cover located in the dining room on the fifth floor was missing. 2. Two (2) of nine (9) ceiling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for six (6) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and/or personal hygiene. Residents' #61, #109, #116, #123, #127, and #144. The findings included: 1. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Dementia, Anxiety Disorder, Tinea Unguium, Unspecified Mood Disorder and Restlessness and Agitation. During a tour of unit 5 north on 07/26/2021, at 2:57 PM, Resident #61 was observed in bed with her heels offloaded on pillows. A head-to-toe skin assessment of the resident was conducted with Employee #19 (Licensed Practical Nurse). The resident ' s fingernails were observed to be long. Toenails on bilateral feet were noted to be very long, thick and yellow. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the following: In Section C (Cognitive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to: (1) administer medications in accordance with professional standards of practice, (2) dispose of medications in a timely manner and (3) accurately reconcile narcotics. Residents ' #67 and #123. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure medication was administered in accordance with professional standards of practice. Review of the facility ' s policy entitled, Medication Administration Policy 5.2 PAXIT MED-Pass Procedure revealed, .Explain to the resident the type of medication to be administered. The resident has the right to be informed of all medications that are administered. 1a. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses which included: Hypertension, Renal Insufficiency, Acute Cholecystitis, Diabetes Mellitus, Hyperlipidemia, Seizure disorder, and Hemiplegia or Hemiparesis. On 7/20/2021, at 10:30 AM, during a medication administration observation, Employee #22 (Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, facility staff failed to distribute and serve foods under sanitary conditions as evidenced by 10 of 11 steam pans that were stacked wet, two (2) of two (2) convection ovens that were soiled throughout, 14 of 42 plastic dinner plates that were soiled, seven (7) of seven (7) food tray transport carts that were marred, two (2) of two food tray transport carts plastic coverings that were torn and soiled, and one (1) of 14 baffle filters from the kitchen range hood that was damaged. The findings included: 1. 10 of 11 full steam pans were stored wet, on a shelf, ready for use. 2. Two (2) of two (2) convection ovens were soiled throughout with leftover burnt food deposits. 3. 14 of 42 dinner plates were soiled throughout. 4. Seven (7) of seven (7) enclosed food tray transport carts located on the second (2), third (1), fourth (2), and fifth floor (2), were soiled on the outside 5. Two (2) of two plastic covers to open food tray transport carts on the first-floor unit were torn and soiled. 6. Stainless-steel/aluminum panels to one (1) of 14 baffle…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, for five (5) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices to minimize the potential spread of infections during medication administration, while providing wound care and not continuing transmission-based precautions. Residents' #61, #64, #67, #168, and #370. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for Residents' #61 and #67. Review of the facility ' s policy and entitled, Medication Administration Policy . documented, . never touch any of the medication with fingers . 1a. During an observation of medication administration on 07/21/2021 at 8:15 AM, Employee #19 (Licensed Practical Nurse) performed hand hygiene, poured five (5) tablets into a 30cc (cubic centimeters) plastic cup, introduced herself to Resident #61. As the employee was administering the pill, two (2) pills fell on to the resident ' s gown.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, facility staff failed to ensure all required documents were conveyed to the receiving health care provider for three (3) of 60 sampled residents that were transferred from the facility to the hospital. Residents' #1, #92 and #145. The findings included: 1. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Peripheral Vascular Disease Unspecified, Vitamin D Deficiency, Muscle Weakness, and Hypertension. Review of the physician's order dated 05/23/2021, directed, Send Resident to ER (emergency room) for s/p (status post) fall and fracture Review of Resident #1's transfer documents dated 05/23/2021, lacked evidence that the facility staff included the care plan goals with the transfer documents. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 07/28/2021, at 4:21 PM, Employee #28, acknowledged the finding and stated, The care plan is separate, we did not send it with them. 2. Resident #92 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately code a resident's assessment on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). Resident #152. The findings included: Resident #152 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease, Malnutrition, Adult Failure to Thrive and Dehydration. Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed in Section P (Restraints) that facility staff coded Resident #152 as, Physical Restraints- Bed rail- used less than daily, indicating that the bedrail was being used as a restraint. During a face-to-face interview conducted on 07/28/2021, at 1:30 PM, Employee #11 (MDS Coordinator) acknowledged the finding and stated, That assessment [MDS dated [DATE]] was coded in error. We don't use restraints in this facility. It needs to be modified.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, for two (2) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of two (2) residents' admission. Residents' #87 and #367. The findings included: 1. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Renal Insufficiency, Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH), and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the following: In Section H (Bowel & Bladder), . Appliances- Indwelling catheter Review of the physician's orders revealed: 05/19/2021 Foley: Change Foley Catheter- 16 Fr (French) 10 ml (milliliters) every month . 05/19/2021 Indwelling catheter every shift due to urinary retention/BPH . Review of the progress notes revealed: 05/19/2021 at 1:53 PM (nursing note) [Resident #87] . readmitted on [DATE] . Foley catheter 16 F (French) in place secondary to prostate CA (cancer) and urinary retention .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan. Resident #87. The findings included: Resident #87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Renal Insufficiency, Urinary Retention, Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH), and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed in Section H (Bowel & Bladder), . Appliances- Indwelling catheter. Review of the physician's orders revealed: 05/19/2021 Foley: Change Foley Catheter- 16 Fr (French) 10 ml (milliliters) every month . 05/19/2021 Indwelling catheter every shift due to urinary retention/BPH . Review of the progress notes revealed: 05/19/2021 at 1:53 PM (nursing note) [Resident #87] . readmitted on [DATE] . Foley catheter 16 F (French) in place secondary to prostate CA (cancer) and urinary retention . During a review of Resident #87's care plan on the 07/28/2021,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for three (3) of 60 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to update/revise the resident's care plan to include person-centered aspects of care. Residents' #2, #51 and #92. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to update/revise the resident's care plan to include person-centered aspects of care for the resident's ileostomy. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include: Ileostomy, Renal Insufficiency and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. The Annual Minimum Data Set completed on 07/06/2021, showed the resident was coded as having an ostomy (ileostomy) under Section H (Bladder and Bowel); and Section I (Active Diagnoses) was coded encounter for attention ileostomy. Review of the physician's orders dated and signed on 06/02/2021, directed the following: Ostomy site .cleanse stoma site with water and pat dry and apply powder Cleanse stoma site with skin prep with each ileostomy bag change as needed nurses to supervise .use…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to demonstrate evidence that Resident #1 received assistance with meals as directed by the care plan and physician ' s orders to maintain the resident ' s ability to carry out ADLs (activities of daily living). The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses of Anemia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3 Moderate and Hypertension. During an observation on 7/19/2021, at 1:05 PM, the writer observed Resident #1 in her room, the head of the bed was raised and the resident was asleep. Her lunchtime meal tray was on the over-the-bed table that was placed to the right side of the resident ' s bed. A lid was covering the plate of food, a roll/bread was wrapped in plastic and two beverages were unopened and lying flat on the tray. At 1:17 PM, the writer observed the staff remove the tray from Resident #1 ' s room and place it on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and staff interviews, for three (3) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with the professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, as evidenced by: failure to ensure one (1) resident ' s blood sugar was obtained in accordance with the professional standards of practice and the physician ' s order; failed to administer hydrocortisone (used to treat redness, swelling, itching, and discomfort of various skin conditions) as ordered by the physician for one (1) resident; and failed to follow the physician ' s orders and care plan approaches for bowel regimen for one (1) resident. Residents' #67, #106, and #369. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to ensure Resident #67 ' s blood sugar was obtained in accordance with the professional standards of practice and the physician ' s order. Resident #67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase their range of motion. Resident #92. The findings included: Resident #92 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Cancer, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Dementia, Dysphagia and Gastrostomy status. According to the Minimum Data Set completed on 06/08/2021, Resident #92 ' s Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was coded as 99, indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. The resident was coded as having impairment to one side of her upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand) under Section G0400 Functional Limitation in Range of Motion. On 07/19/2021, at approximately 3:50 PM and on 07/21/2021, at 12:07 PM, Resident #92 was observed lying in bed with her left hand in a closed position. Review of the physician ' s…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to ensure that a resident ' s respiratory care was consistent with professional standards of practice. Resident #8. The findings included: Review of the facility ' s policy entitled, Respiratory Care - Prevention of Infection, documented, . Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven (7) days, or per state regulations (whichever is more strict), or as needed . On 07/20/2021, at approximately 11:30 AM, Resident #8 was observed lying down in her bed and wearing a nasal cannula. There was no labeling noted on the resident ' s nasal cannula tubing to indicate the last date and time that either was changed. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with multiple diagnoses that included: Shortness of Breath, Heart Failure, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. During a face-to-face interview conducted at the time of the observation, Employee #28 (2nd floor Unit Manager), she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, the facility staff failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction for a resident who used Bupropion (antidepressant) HCL (hydrochloride) SR (sustain released tablet) daily for depression. Resident #123. The findings included: During observations from 07/19/2021 to 07/29/2021, Resident #123 was observed in her room, alert, oriented to name, place, time, very pleasant watching movies and interacting with staff. Resident #123 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The medical record revealed the resident had multiple diagnoses including Major Depression. Review of the physician ' s order dated 02/12/2021, ordered, Bupropion HCL SR 150 milligrams by mouth one time a day for depression. Review of the psychotherapy progress notes from 02/16/2021 to 07/20/2021, lacked documented evidence that Resident #123 was observed or verbalized she had any signs/symptoms of depression. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, for one (1) of 60 sampled residents, facility staff failed to accurately document resident assessments in the medical record in accordance with professional standards and practice. Resident #3. The findings included: Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Psychotic Disorder, Muscle Weakness and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the following: In Section E (Behavior) - . Wandering- Presence and Frequency- Has the resident wandered? the resident was coded 2 indicating, Behavior of this type occurred 4 to 6 days, but less than daily. In Section I (Active Diagnoses) - Hypertension, Insomnia Unspecified. Review of the physician ' s orders revealed: 04/12/2018 Check wander guard (roam alert) for safety risk placement q (every) shift . Review of the care plan revealed the following problem areas: 12/17/2014 [Resident #3] wanders r/t (related to)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to maintain a low air loss mattress (for pressure redistribution) in a safe operating condition for one (1) of 60 sampled resident ' s using a low air loss mattress, Resident #64; and failed to maintain essential equipment in safe condition as evidenced by one (1) of 14 baffle filters from the kitchen range hood that was damaged. The findings included: 1. Facility staff failed to maintain a low air loss mattress in a safe operating condition for Resident #64. During observations on 07/23/2021 at 8:30 AM, 10:30 AM and 12:23 PM, Resident #64 ' s low air loss mattress was inflated, but the mattress pump ' s operating light was off. Resident #64 ' s medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including Generalized Muscle Weakness, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Acute Kidney Failure. A review of the current physician ' s orders showed the following: 10/21/2020 Low air mattress 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-28 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the call bell system in good working condition as evidenced by call bells in three (3) of 43 resident's rooms that failed to alarm when tested. The findings included: During an environmental tour of the facility on 07/21/2021, at approximately 3:00 PM, and on 0722/2021, at approximately 11:00 AM, call bells in three (3) of 47 resident ' s rooms (#215, #455, #555) failed to initiate an alarm when tested. These breakdowns could prevent or delay staff from responding to resident ' s needs in a timely manner. During a face-to-face interview on 07/22/2021, at approximately 12:30 AM, Employee #7 acknowledged the findings.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$167,394 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $137,333 — penalty dated 2026-06-16
- $13,260 — penalty dated 2026-03-24
- $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-09-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-27 for 76 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASCENSION LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 5 of 5 | 3.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 3.4 | +1.6 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCENSION HEALTH SENIOR CARE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 07/01/2014 |
| MUSGRAVE, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SMOOT, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SHADBOLT, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/28/2023 |
| DALE, KEYSHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2024 |
| JOSEPH, BINDU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/29/2017 |
| HANNAH GEORGE | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/24/2024 |
| HEALTH DIMENSIONS CONSULTING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/02/2019 |
| HOUSE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2025 |
| MEDICAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/14/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $3.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in DC
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the District of Columbia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 095034. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.