Wheaton Franciscan HC - Terrace at St Francis
3200 S 20th St, Milwaukee, WI 53215 · Non profit - Corporation · 81 certified beds · (414) 389-3200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (80) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $219,651 in federal fines (most recent 2026-01-06)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (82%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.6% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.3% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.3% | 3.3% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.7% | 18.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.2% | 16.9% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.8% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 6.0% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.3% | 24.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.8% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.8% | 82.2% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.9% | 23.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.5% | 15.5% | 12.0% | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 69.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.9%CMS range 41.0–61.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 7.5–14.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 69.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 3.5–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 40.1 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 41 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.71 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.38 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 82% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
80 citations, most serious first. The 21 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure staff followed a resident's plan of care for transfers for 1 (R5) of 3 residents reviewed for transfers. The facility staff did not report or investigate a resident's fall to determine causative factors and did not implement preventative measures for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed with falls. * On 12/11/23, R5 was transferred with 1 staff instead of 2 staff as identified on R5's care plan, and with a Hoyer lift sling that was not the appropriate size, resulting in a fall from the Hoyer lift and death. R5's plan of care was not followed regarding sling size and the need for 2 staff assistance for transfers. The facility's failure to ensure staff followed the resident's plan of care resulted in a fall, injury, and death, and created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 12/11/23. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator-A of the immediate jeopardy on 1/11/24 at 2:35 PM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 12/12/23, however, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 3 (R3, R1, and R6) of 5 Residents received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. *R3 sustained a left femur fracture when CNA-P transferred R3 alone when R3 was to be a two person transfer and the sit-to-stand lost power. During the survey, R3 was observed not have the leg brace on at all times per physician orders, a follow-up x-ray of the left femur was not obtained, and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA-F and CNA-G) were observed not operating the mechanical lift correctly when transferring R3. *R1's floor mat was not down next to the bed per care plan during the survey process. *R6's fall interventions were not followed for toileting after meals. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Lifting Machine, Using a Portable last revised [DATE] documents: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to help lift residents using a manual lifting device. Preparation: A. Review the resident's care plan to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent development of pressure injuries or received care to promote healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 4 (R4, R16, R13, and R9) of 4 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. *R4 did not have skin assessments completed timely when readmitted to the facility with the development of pressure injuries. Treatments were not initiated when ordered or completed as ordered, and weekly comprehensive assessments of the pressure injuries were not documented. Surveyor observed R4 with a pressure injury to the right buttock that the facility staff was not aware of. * R16 developed a Stage 2 pressure injury to the left buttock on 2/13/2025 that was not comprehensively assessed and a Stage 2 pressure injury to the right buttock developed on 2/26/2025. The treatment order was not implemented and was documented as an intervention on the Communication Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R24) of 1 resident reviewed for a suprapubic catheter received appropriate treatment and services related to catheter care. * R24 has physician orders in place for catheter care and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed many dates care was not documented as provided. R24 has been treated for urinary tract infections (UTIs) four times in the last six months, in addition to the prophylactic antibiotic R24 has physician orders to receive twice daily to prevent UTIs. Findings include: The facility procedure titled Catheter Care, Urinary last approved 1/2024, states in part: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections . Complications A. Observe the resident for complications associated with urinary catheters . 2. Check the urine for unusual appearance . 5. Observe for other signs and symptoms of urinary tract infection or urinary retention.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 2 (R13 & R25) of 12 residents. * R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R13's treatments for surgical pin sites didn't start until 3/31/24 and the left heel did not start until 3/30/24. The facility did not follow the treatment recommended by the hospital for the pin sites and the nurse who wrote the order is no longer at the facility. There are no assessments for the left heel after 4/5/24, the left upper thigh after 4/1/24, and there are no assessment for the left ankle pin site. R13 was transferred to the hospital on 5/14/24 after a wound appointment and was admitted with severe sepsis. * Neuro checks were not complete in accordance with facility policy following R25's 6/30/24 fall. Findings include: The facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY *) R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include type 2 diabetes mellitus, dementia, Alzheimer's, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, heart failure, pulmonary fibrosis, chronic kidney disease stage 3, heart failure, altered mental status, weakness, abnormalities of gait and balance, history of pressure injuries to heels, and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. R11's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R11 had moderately impaired cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 and the facility assessed R11 needing maximal assistance with 1 staff member for lower body dressing, bathing, and toileting hygiene and supervision for personal hygiene and upper body dressing and extensive assist with 1 staff member for bed mobility to reposition. R11 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder and wore an adult brief for protection. R11 was on continuous oxygen therapy via nasal canula and used a wheelchair that R11 was able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure each resident (R) received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 3 (R29, R25, and R13) of 4 residents. *R29 had an injury of unknown origin of bruising to left eye on 5/2/24. On 5/16/24, R29 had bruising to right eye and right foot. R29 sustained a laceration requiring 2 stitches between the right big toe and second toe and had an acute fracture in the proximal phalanx of the first digit. On 6/3/24, R29 sustained an acute impacted fracture at the distal femur. The facility stated the injuries were by different safety concerns that were not assessed or thoroughly investigated to prevent future injury. *R25 had a fall on 6/30/24 and the intervention of having a reacher accessible was put in place. *R13 was transferred by 1 staff instead of 2 by Hoyer lift and was lowered to the ground on 3/29/24. Findings Include: The facility's Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting for Residents dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure a resident's primary provider was notified when there was a change of condition for 1 (R2) of 13 residents reviewed for notification of changes. R2's physician was not notified when facility staff assessed R2 as having upper body bruising, +3 edema to bilateral lower extremities with bilateral lower extremity weeping, swollen body, swollen penis, decline in oral intake, fatigued, cloudy urine with sediment, and jaundice in color. Facility staff did not get a clarifying conflicting orders regarding R2's left hip surgical site to determine if R2's non-removable dressing should stay in place or if R2 should receive a treatment as ordered. R2's family requested R2 be transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. R2 was diagnosed with infected wounds, and infected surgical cite, urinary tract infection all requiring IV antibotics and IV Lasix for aggressive diuresis. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Change in a Resident's Condition Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care based on a comprehensive assessment and in accordance with professional standards of practice for non-pressure injuries and a change in medical conditions for 1 (R2) of 13 residents reviewed. -R2 had a left hip surgical wound that was not assessed after admission on [DATE], treatments were not routinely completed as ordered, and it became infected and required intravenous antibiotics on 12/17/2023. -R2 had conflicting treatments for a left hip surgical site. Nursing admission documentation states there is a non-removal dressing, but the admission orders document to clean surgical site with normal saline followed by a dry dressing, change daily and as needed. Staff did not clarify which order to follow. -R2 had left leg weakness and increased pain on 12/10/2023 requiring a transfer using a sit to stand. The facility did not investigate or do an assessment for R2's increased weakness and pain to R2's left leg.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent pressure injuries from developing for 3 (R4, R7, and R10) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R4 developed a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) to the right outer ankle and a DTI to the right heel on 10/25/2023. The right heel was documented as an Unstageable pressure injury with characteristics of a DTI. Antibiotics were ordered on 10/25/2023 due to the presentation of the right heel pressure injury with potential for osteomyelitis. The right ankle pressure injury was not comprehensively assessed weekly from 10/25/2023 through 11/21/2023. No revision was made to the Care Plan when the pressure injuries were discovered. The Registered Dietician was not informed of the pressure injuries. Antibiotics were ordered on 11/13/2023 due to the presentation of the right ankle pressure injury. R4 was hospitalized from [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-01-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who have indwelling catheters were assessed for removal as soon as possible unless clinical conditions demonstrate catheterization is necessary and received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 (R2) of 2 residents reviewed for incontinence. R2 was admitted to the facility with a Foley catheter. R2's admission paperwork to the facility recommended a urology follow up appointment for R2's Foley catheter. The facility did not arrange a follow up urology appointment and there was no attempt at a trial removal of R2's Foley catheter. On 12/17/2024, R2's family requested R2 be transferred to the hospital for further evaluation. R2 was diagnosed with a Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI). Antibiotics were administered. R2 became mentally altered and developed acute kidney injury. Findings include: The facility policy entitled PROCEDURE: Catheter Care, Urinary approved on 1/2024 states: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 4 residents are treated with respect & dignity and recognizes each resident's individuality.At the end of November, the facility was changing resident's beds that were not changed five or six years ago. R1 was approached about changing her bed and said no. R1's bed was changed on 11/25/25. R1 complained to staff about the bed and being in pain. Surveyor did note an increase in her pain scale and use of prn (as needed) Norco 5/325 mg (pain medication) during the time R1 was provided with the new bed. After a few weeks, the facility agreed to change R1's bed back to an older bed and R1's bed was switched back to an older bed on 12/18/25. For the beds to be switched R1's belongings needed to be removed to the hallway. During this process several of R1's possessions were removed from the hallway and placed in the garbage chute room as staff had been trying to clean R1's room. After the bed was switched and R1's belongings were brought back in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure a resident wound was comprehensively assessed weekly, along with interventions to promote healing. This was observed with 1 (R4) of 1 resident observed with a skin wound. R4 developed a skin wound requiring a treatment. This wound was not comprehensively assessed weekly to determine progression of healing.Findings include:The facility policy and procedure titled Skin Identification, Evaluation and Monitoring dated 11/2022 documents: The purpose of this policy is to outline a method of identification, evaluation and monitoring for alterations in skin integrity. Communities will implement preventative measures, and an individualized care plan will be formulated upon completion of findings.The Procedure; Weekly: the licensed nursing associate will document integumentary findings appearance of the wound including measurements treatment applied or initiated per healthcare provider order in the medical record. Document evaluation in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and does not develop pressure injuries unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure injuries receives necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing for 1 of 1 (R2) residents reviewed for pressure injuries.R2 was assessed to be at risk for the development of pressure injuries and developed a facility acquired pressure injury that was not comprehensively assessed until 1 week later when seen by the wound physician, which then documented an unstageable pressure injury due to necrosis. The care plan did not identify person-centered interventions for the frequency of turning and repositioning, the frequency of checking and changing due to incontinence, and the care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-10-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all written grievance decisions included the steps taken to investigate the grievance, a summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concerns(s), a statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed, any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance, and the date the written decision was issued for 2 of 2 (R2 and R3) residents reviewed for grievances. R2 and R3's grievances were not thoroughly investigated; no corrective action was taken, and a written decision was not issued. Findings include: 1.) R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that include hypertension, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, depression, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, chronic pain, urinary tract infection and sepsis. R2 discharged from the facility on 10/11/25. The facility policy titled Complaints and Grievances last approved 06/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 (R3) of 1 allegations of neglect were immediately reported to the Administrator and/or Grievance Officer and submitted to the State Survey Agency. *On 8/27/25, Surveyor reviewed the grievance dated 8/27/25 which documents:-Showers have not been completed, with CNA-F documenting multiple refusals while other staff are able to accomplish the task.-One resident reported needing assistance in cleaning up food that had spilled from her bedside table; she stated that CNA-F refused to help her with the cleanup.-Another resident expressed wanting to get up and be ready for therapy, but CNA-F reportedly came, turned off light and left the room, leaving her unattended.The facility did not submit an Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, and Abuse Report to the State Survey Agency.The facility did not submit a Misconduct Incident Report to the State Survey Agency.Findings include:The facility's Abuse Prevention policy and procedure last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure 1(R3) of 1 allegations of neglect were thoroughly investigated and submitted to the State Survey Agency.*On 8/27/25, Surveyor reviewed the grievance dated 8/27/25 which documents:-Showers have not been completed, with CNA-F documenting multiple refusals while other staff are able to accomplish the task.-One resident reported needing assistance in cleaning up food that had spilled from her bedside table; she stated that CNA-F refused to help her with the cleanup.-Another resident expressed wanting to get up and be ready for therapy, but CNA-F reportedly came, turned off light and left the room, leaving her unattended.The facility did not submit an Alleged Nursing Home Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, and Abuse Report to the State Survey Agency. The facility did not submit a Misconduct Incident Report to the State Survey Agency.Findings include:The facility's Abuse Prevention policy and procedure last revised 8/2025 documents:IdentificationA. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming for 1 (R1) of 6 residents reviewed for ADL's (Activity of Daily Living).On 10/28/25 R1 was not provided with or offered oral care, shaving, or brushing/combing R1's hair.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Patient Personal Hygiene: Guidelines for Providing Care (CHG Bathing) last revised 1/11/24 under policy statement documents As a health ministry of the Catholic Church, and in accord with all applicable laws and regulations, it is the policy of Ascension St. [NAME] Indiana to provide guidance for providing personal hygiene to all inpatients. Personal Hygiene (including washing hair) is to be offered to all inpatients at least daily and documented as completed or refused in the patient's medical record. Under mouth care section for A. Adult Oral Care - non-intubated patient documents 1. Examine mouth for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R1) of 6 Residents. R1's has a right upper extremity PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter). Upon R1's readmission to the facility on [DATE], the PICC line dressing order was incorrectly entered, and facility staff were only changing the transparent portion of the dressing weekly and not the entire dressing per current standards of care. Findings include:The facility's policy last revised 12/2017 and titled, Procedure: Midline Dressing Changes documents: The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-related infections associated with contaminated, loosened, or soiled catheter-site dressings. Under General Guidelines section it documents: A. Change midline catheter dressings 24 hours after catheter insertion, every 5-7 days, or if it is wet, dirty, not intact, or compromised in any way.R1's diagnoses include multiple sclerosis, (disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents with a pressure injury or at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 2 (R1 & R3) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. *R1 has multiple pressure injuries which developed prior to the facility's last recertification survey with an exit date of 8/20/25. R1 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 9/11/25. The assessment for R1's left buttocks does not have the correct stage. Registered Nurse/Interim Unit Manager (RN/IUM)-M assessed R1's left buttock as a Stage 2 with granulation tissue. A stage 2 does not have granulation tissue. R1 was hospitalized from [DATE] to 10/3/25. R1's right lateral foot pressure injury was not assessed until 10/9/25 by Wound Doctor-Q. On 10/7/25 LPN-O completed a skin evaluation form for R1's right buttock, thigh left posterior, buttock left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 2 residents with indwelling urinary catheter received the appropriate care and services.R1 was observed without a stat lock on R1's catheter tubing per physician orders and CNA-J was observed not clean the end of spigot prior to placing the spigot back in the collection bag.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Urinary Elimination Standard of Care Including Indwelling Urinary Catheter Insertion/Maintenance/Removal & Urinary Incontinence and Retention - Adult and last revised 5/23/22 under Indwelling Catheter Maintenance documents G. Maintain unobstructed urine flow by keeping the collection bag below the bladder, off the floor, unkinked and regularly empty collection bag with patient specific collection container. Avoid touching drainage spigot with collection container when emptying.R1's diagnoses include multiple sclerosis, (disease in which the immune system eats away the protective covering of nerves resulting in disruption in communication between the brain & body), spastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 1 (R3) of 1 Resident.* Staff did not perform hand hygiene before, during, and after transferring R3 with the mechanical lift. Staff did not wipe down the mechanical lift after transferring R3.Findings include:The facility's Hand Hygiene last revised 6/25 documents:Policy Statement: This community considers hand hygiene the single most important practice to prevent infections and promote resident safety. Evidence based hand hygiene guidance is practiced to reduce the risk of transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to residents, associates, and visitors.Policy Interpretation and ImplementationA. Supplies necessary for adherence to hand hygiene are readily accessible in all areas where resident care is being delivered.E. Hand hygiene is practiced:1.Immediately before touching a resident4. After touching a resident or the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-20 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) reviewed received registry verification that the individual has met competency evaluation requirements. CNA-L's Wisconsin Nurse Aide Registry certification expired and CNA-L continued working in the facility. This deficient practice has the ability to affect 41 of 41 residents residing at the facility whom have the potential to and or received cares from CNA-L.Findings include:According to the Wisconsin Nurse's Aide Training and Registry, Nurse Aides must be listed on the Wisconsin Nurse Aide Registry in order to be employed in any federally eligible health care setting in Wisconsin. The registry ensures that that the individual has met competency evaluation requirements to work as a CNA. On [DATE], Surveyor reviewed CNA registry information for 5 randomly CNAs. CNA-L was listed on the registry. Surveyor noted that CNA-L's CNA certification expired on [DATE] and was not renewed. CNA-L had worked in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — widespreadProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services that assure proper dispensing of medications, did not ensure drug records are in order, or all controlled drugs are maintained and periodically reconciled.*The facility does not have a process for medications that should be returned to the pharmacy for possible reimbursement or otherwise destroyed; and keeping a log of those medications.*The facility did not ensure that controlled medication logs were accurate and reconciled.This deficient practice has to potential to affect 41 of 41 residents residing at the facility whom have the potential to and or receive pharmaceutical services. Findings:The Facility's policy, titled Discarding and Destroying Medications, dated 01/2024, documents . C. Unless otherwise prohibited under applicable federal or state laws, individual resident medications supplied in sealed unopened containers may be returned to the issuing pharmacy for disposition provided that: 1. No medications covered under the Federal Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 4 (R8, R5, R42 and R11) of 6 residents and/or their representative that were reviewed, were provided the risks and benefits for prescribed psychotropic medication. * R8 received an antidepressant and antipsychotic medication with no evidence that the risks and benefits were explained, reviewed or provided. * R5 received an antidepressant medication with no evidence of risks and benefits were explained, reviewed or provided. * R42 received an antidepressant and antipsychotic medication with no evidence of risks and benefits were explained, reviewed or provided. *R11 received an antipsychotic medication with no evidence of risks and benefits were explained, reviewed or provided. The facility's policy and procedure, Psychotropic Medication, dated 6/2025 documents under Section T, Consents for Psychotropic Medications: 1. If a resident is admitted on a psychotropic medication, nursing will obtain appropriate and necessary written consent. 2. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 5 (R1, R2, R5, R33, and R44) of 5 residents reviewed for hospitalizations received the proper notice of transfer, reason for transfer, location of transfer, appeal rights, and name and address (including mail and email) with the telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, were notified of the reason for transfer/discharge & bed hold policy in writing to the resident & their representative and the rate to reserve the residents bed, and there was no documentation that the ombudsman was being notified of hospitalizations. *R1 was transferred to the hospital on 3/20/2025, 5/20/2025, and 6/27/2025. A transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R1 and/ or R1's representative. There is not evidence that the ombudsman was notified of R1's hospitalizations. *R2 was transferred to the hospital on 5/12/2025 and 6/2/2025. A transfer notice and bed hold rate was not provided in writing to R2 and/or R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not complete neurological (neuro) checks in accordance with policy and procedure for 5 (R27, R5, R42, R8 and R11) of 5 residents reviewed for falls. *R27 had an unwitnessed fall on 08/10/2025, no neurological checks were completed. *R5 had 5 unwitnessed falls, 2 of the falls had incomplete neurological checks and 1 fall had no neuro checks documented. *R42 had had 4 falls, 2 of the falls had incomplete or missing neurological checks. *R8 had 1 unwitnessed fall with incomplete neurological checks. *R11 had 1 unwitnessed fall with no documented neurological checks completed. Findings include: 1.) On 08/18/2025, at 10:08 AM, Surveyor observed R27 with a large bruise to the right side of R27's forehead that extended down under R27's right eye. Surveyor Reviewed R27's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and noted a progress note dated 08/10/2025, indicating R27 had an unwitnessed fall on 08/10/2025 and a neurological assessment was completed. Surveyor requested R27's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not timely act upon recommendations based on a pharmacist medication regimen review report for 4 (R6, R5, R8 and R42) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: The facilities policy titled Pharmacy Services-Role of the Consultant Pharmacist dated 2/25 was reviewed and documented: The Director of Nurses (DON), or designee will ensure the recommendations are followed through on a timely basis, which does not exceed 30 days. Irregularities will be addressed as soon as possible, but not to exceed 24 hours. The attending physician will document in the resident's medical record that the irregularity was received and what action was taken to accommodate it. 1) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Depression and Schizophrenia. R6's Pharmacist's Medication Regimen Recommendations (MRR) documented: * 3/19/25: R6 is currently receiving clozapine, for which the following lab oratory monitoring is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility did not ensure resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records for 1(R9) of 41 residents reviewed.*On 08/19/2025, at 7:23 AM, R9's personally identifiable information (PII) or Personal Health Information (PHI) was observed to be thrown into the regular garbage during medication pass.Findings:The Facility's policy, titled Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) Privacy Program last revised 06/01/2023, documents in part, . [Name] Health Alliance is committed to protecting the privacy rights of our patients and residents ( individuals). In compliance with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( HIPPA), the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act ( HITECH) and applicable federal and state laws and regulations (together, HIPPA Rules), this [Name] Procedure ( Procedure) sets forth the HIPPA Privacy Program policies, procedures, and standards (the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that an alleged violation involving misappropriation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 Facility Reported Incidents reviewed.*The facility could not provide documentation that weekly audits of narcotic medication counts were preformed, following a narcotic discrepancy identified on [DATE].Findings:Surveyor reviewed the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency on [DATE] regarding a discrepancy in the appearance of R27's liquid Morphine (a controlled, narcotic medication), indicating the Morphine was lighter in color instead of the usual dark blue hue.The facility indicated the police were notified, the medication was removed from the medication cart, pain assessments were completed for residents, residents were interviewed as well as staff, weekly audits during medication counts for the next six weeks and medication audit found medication were properly stored.On [DATE], Surveyor requested the full investigation for the FRI…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure for 2 (R11, R6) of 2 residents reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) screenings had a PASARR level two screening completed after triggering for it on the level one PASARR. *R11 had a completed level 1 PASARR, which indicated a level 2 was needed and the facility did not ensure a level 2 PASARR was completed within the required time frame after the 30-day extension was exceeded. *R6 had a completed level 1 PASARR, which indicated a level 2 was needed and the facility did not ensure a level 2 PASARR was completed after the 30-day extension was exceeded. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled PASARR (Pre admission Screening & Resident Review) dated 4/2025 documents: Policy Statement. The purpose of this policy is to outline the screening of residents with a history of serious mental illness in developmental disability. Procedure A. Complete level I screen of the PASARR on new admissions. 3. Those…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R8) of 2 residents reviewed whom is at risk for the development of pressure injuries received the necessary care and services for prevention and healing of pressure injuries/wounds.*R8 was at risk for developing pressure injuries. Surveyor had multiple observations R8 without pressure relieving interventions in place on 8/18/25 and 8/19/25.Findings include:R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia (a decline in mental abilities), Anemia (a lack of oxygen rich red blood cells in one's body which may result in tiredness or weakness) and Depression. R8's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/19/25 documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating that R8's is moderately cognitively impaired. The MDS documents that R8 requires extensive to total assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including transfers, toileting,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure 3 (R8, R19 & R27) of 4 residents reviewed were free from accidents and hazards as possible. *R8 was observed without fall interventions in place in accordance with their comprehensive care plan on on 8/18/25 & 8/19/25. *R19 sustained an unwitnessed skin tear to their elbow. The facility did not investigate the root cause of R19's unwitnessed skin tear or implement new interventions to prevent further accidents. *R27 sustained a fall. The facility did not implement comprehensive care plan interventions, including therapy services, to prevent future falls and accidents. Findings Include: 1.) R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia (a decline in mental abilities), Anemia (a lack of oxygen rich red blood cells in one’s body which may result in tiredness or weakness) and Depression. R8’s Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 4/19/25 notes R8with a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure consistent communication for 1 (R2) of 1 resident who receives dialysis services.R2's dialysis communication tools were missing for 5 days of 14 days reviewed.Findings include:The facility's Dialysis policy with origination date 12/2017 and last approved date 01/2025 documents: Policy Statement: It is the policy of this community to provide coordination of care with the resident's dialysis provider. Policy Interpretation and Implementation:-Residents needing dialysis services will be admitted with the co-ordination of their dialysis provider off site with a predetermined schedule-Communities are to review contracts to assure resident's needs are met while residing at the facility -The community will co-ordinate care with the dialysis provider in developing an appropriate plan of care to include, but not limited to:a. Specific days of the week resident will attend dialysis .f. Dialysis center's expectation of care to be completed by SNF (skilled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication rate was not 5 percent or greater. This deficient practice was observed in 2 (R32 and R9) of 6 residents receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 18.52 percent.*R32 was given 15 milliliters (ml) of liquid Potassium Chloride, but is only ordered to receive 3.75ml. R32 received medication through an enteral feeding tube. The Enteral Tube was not flushed prior to administering the medications and was not flushed after administering the medications, until approximately 1 hour later.*R9 was administered Insulin that was past the discard by date.Findings include:The Facility policy titled, Administering Medications dated 12/2024 documents: .C. Medications shall be administered in accordance with the orders and within the allowable time frame per best practice/regulatory guidelines. H. The expiration/beyond use date on the medication label is to be checked prior to administering. The Facility policy titled, Medication Administration vis Enteral Tube dated 12/2024 documents: .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident (R) R2 and R3) out of a total sample of 13, were protected from abuse when, R2 and R3 were observed holding hands and kissing by staff members. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention, dated 08/2024 stated, Our residents have the right to be free from abuse .This includes, but is not limited to .sexual or physical abuse .'Sexual abuse' is 'non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident.' . Generally, sexual contact is non-consensual if the resident either: a. Appears to want the contact to occur, but lacks the cognitive ability to consent; or .Reported sexual activity involving residents scoring below cognitively intact, ?12 on a BIMS, shall be investigated per Abuse Investigation Policy . Review of the facility's Capacity to Consent for Sexual Intimacy assessment provided by the Business Operations Manager revealed assessments were not completed for R2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two residents (Resident (R)2 and R3) out of a total sample of 13 had accurate care plans. This failure increased the risk of the resident's safety and monitoring. Specifically, R2 had a history of sexually inappropriately touching other residents and was observed kissing/holding hands with R3 on 05/02/25. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans- Comprehensive Person-Centered revised 10/2021 stated A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs, that are identified through evaluation and assessment, is developed and implemented for each resident .The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: 1. Include measurable objectives and time frames .J. Areas…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure transmission based precaution (TBP) and/or Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) procedures were consistently followed by staff for six residents (Resident (R)23, R6, R25, R36, R34, and R27); the facility failed to ensure infection prevention procedures related to the cleaning/sanitizing of glucometers were followed for eight residents (R4, R5, R3, R18, R15, R16, R19 and R20) out of a total of 33 residents reviewed in the sample; and the facility failed to ensure the facility's overall program for infection tracking and trending/data analysis procedures were consistently followed. These failures created the potential for increased risk of infection for all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control dated 08/2024 indicated, Prevention of Infection: Important factors of infection prevention include: a. identifying possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with non-pressure wounds received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards for 3 (R7, R16, and R9) of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure wounds. Additionally, the facility did not ensure residents had emergency medical equipment available to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice due to 3 of 3 crash carts not maintained and fully supplied potentially affecting 39 of the 62 residents that elected to be full code status. * R7 developed a non-pressure wound to the lower mid spine on 2/6/2025. A comprehensive assessment was not completed; no wound measurements or descriptors of the wound were documented. R7 was seen by the wound physician on 2/12/2025 when a treatment was ordered to the wound; the treatment was not initiated until 2/19/2025. R7 was seen by a dermatologist on 3/3/2025 and no assessment of the wound was documented after 3/20/2025. Observation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured properly for three of three medication carts (first, second and third floor medication carts). This failure placed residents' medication to be at risk for diversion and/or at risk to be taken by cognitively impaired residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications revised 12/2024 revealed, .O. During administration of medications, the medication cart will be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. No medications are kept on top of the cart. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or other passing by . 1. During an observation of the third floor on 03/25/25 at 4:30 PM, the medication cart was observed to be unlocked and unattended at the nurses station. No nursing staff was observed in the area. During an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-S on 03/25/25 at 4:35 PM, he confirmed he was responsible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents' physician was notified when the residents were not administered their medications per the physician's order for 7 of 7 residents reviewed for physician notification Resident (R) R10, R18, R19, R23, R22, R21 and R17. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet treatment needs and the physician notified to address the resident's treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, revised 12/2024 revealed, Q. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering the medication shall document on the MAR or eMAR [electronic medication administration record] for that drug and dose .3. Notify health care provider (physician) of 2 consecutive refused doses .Y The policy did not address notification of the physician for mediation not being available to be administered. 1. Review of R10's Profile Face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility procedure, the facility failed to ensure routine bathing services were provided for one resident (R9) of a total of 33 residents reviewed in the sample. This failure created the potential for R9 to experience hygienic complications related to going without care planned bathing for extended periods of time. Findings include: Review of the facility's Shower/Tub Bath Procedure dated 02/2024 indicated, The purpose of this procedure is to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin .Documentation: The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) record and/or in the resident's medical record: A. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed; and D. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason why and the intervention taken; and E. The signature and title of the person recording the data; and Reporting: A. Notify the supervisor if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure root cause analysis was conducted and an updated care plan put into place after falls were experienced by three residents (R)13, R14 and R17) out of 33 residents reviewed in the sample. This failure created the potential for these resident to continue to experience falls. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents ad Incidents - Investigation and Reporting dated 01/2024 indicated, Accidents and incidents involving resident shall be investigated and reporting completed, .federal requirements .The Health Care Administrator, or designee and interdisciplinary team will review the incident at the next scheduled meeting. Review of the facility's policy titled, Falls dated 01/2024 indicated, Fall should be reviewed at the Daily Stand-Up Meeting following the fall for identification of any additional individualized interventions to reduce the risk of falls. 1. Review of R13's Profile Face Sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to maintain pharmaceutical services by ensuring medications were available to be administered as ordered by their physician to meet their medical needs for nine of nine residents (R)18, R19, R9, R5, R17, R21, R22, R23 and R24 reviewed for medication availability. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet pharmacological interventions to maintain or improve their medical conditions. * Failure to ensure the availability of ordered medications for R9, R18, and R19 * Medication administration observed for R23, R22, R21, and R17 with an error rate of 97.05% * R5's physician ordered Imatinib medication unavailable * R24 had a delay in the start of physician ordered ertapenem intravenous antibiotic medication * R22 has medications that are EC (enteric coated) and ER (extended release) that were crushed and R22's levetiracetam was observed being crushed as well. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three residents (R10, R5 and R24) out of a total of 33 residents reviewed in the sample was free from a significant medication error. This failure created the potential for residents to experience negative physical and/or psychosocial effects related to the omission of necessary ordered medication. * R5 had a physician order to receive one 400mg Imatinib tablet (Per Mayoclinic.org Imatinib is used to treat different types of cancer or bone marrow conditions. It prevents or stops the growth of cancer cells.) daily. R5 did not receive Imatinib between 3/19/2025 and 4/1/2025, nine were marked as Med not administered and five administrations were signed out even though the Facility did not have the medication in stock. Hence, 14 administrations were unavailable for administration and still not available at the time of Surveyor's exit from the Facility. * R24 returned from the hospital on 3/26/25 with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-01 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure a trough level result was received timely from their laboratory for one of one resident reviewed for laboratory results (Resident (R) 18.) R18's physician ordered a laboratory trough level be obtained for R18 for the resident to be able to continue antibiotic infusions; however, there was a delay in the laboratory results and the resident missed four antibiotic infusions. This failure placed the resident at risk of the infection worsening. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Laboratory, Radiology, and other Diagnostic Test Results dated 01/2024 revealed, .The resident's Attending Physician will be notified of the results of laboratory Policy Interpretation and Implementation .A. Results of laboratory .tests shall be reported in writing to the resident's Attending Physician or to the community. B. Should the test results be provided to the community; the Attending Physician shall be promptly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5% for 2 residents (R6 and R7) of 2 residents observed receiving medications. The facility medication error rate was 32%. *R6 received a Folic Acid supplement and the order was discontinued on 12/9/24. Five medications were given more than 60 minutes after the scheduled time. *R7 has an order for Fluticasone Propionate, one spray per nostril, two sprays were observed being given in each nostril. A medication to control blood pressure was also given more than an hour after the scheduled time. Findings include: The Facility Policy and Procedure titled, Medication Administration Schedule last approved 9/2023, states in part: Policy Statement: Medications shall be administered according to established schedules and per resident preference, as appropriate. Policy Interpretation and Implementation A. Health Care Provider order and/or a pharmacy recommendation may specifically define administration intervals such as every 6 hours, or a specific administration time. The nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Uncorrected at Revisit Survey Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R16, R44) of 3 Residents reviewed for pain management, received pain management consistent with professional standards of practice. *R16 did not receive topical pain relief medication as ordered by the physician. R16 did not have complete pain assessments, or evaluation of the effectiveness of pain interventions. *R44 did not have complete pain assessments, or evaluation of the effectiveness of pain interventions. Findings include: The Facility's policy titled, Pain Assessment and Management, with a last approved date of 01/2024, documents in part, the purpose of this procedure are to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions that are consistent with the resident's goals and needs and that address the underlying cause of pain. General Guidelines A. The pain management program is based on a community-wide commitment to resident comfort. B. Pain management is defined as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not provide pharmaceutical services that assure the accurate dispensing of medications to meet the needs of residents and did not have sufficient detailed records for controlled drugs to enable an accurate reconciliation for 2 (R369, R44) of 4 residents reviewed. *R44's Medication Administration Record (MAR) did not accurately reflect the controlled medication narcotic count sheet. R44's had an order for Protonix to be administered 30 minutes prior to meals, that order was not transcribed to R44's Medication Administration Record, as ordered. *R369's personal glucose monitor was not properly labeled to identify the glucose monitor belonged to R369. Findings include: 1.) R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R44 has relevant diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis, pain in right hip, pain in left hip, Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus. R44's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents R44 having a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure food was stored, prepared and served in a sanitary manner. This practice had the potential to affect 47 of 47 Residents residing in the facility. *On 7/15/24 and 7/16/24, Surveyor observed Food Service Associate (FSA)-C not wearing a beard net while preparing plates and trays for Residents in the second floor kitchenette. *On 7/15/24 and 7/16/24, Surveyor observed the facility's low temperature dish machine not reach the minimum required temperature of 120 F and Food Service Aide (FSA)-C, FSA-D, and FSA-E all stated they do not use test strips to test the sanitizer solution concentration (50-100ppm-parts per million sodium solution hypochlorite [chlorine]), thus not ensuring proper sanitation. Findings Include: The facility's policy Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control; Dish Machine Temperatures Issued 5/95, and Last Revised on 1/24 documents: .:Policies: Dishmachine wash and rinse water should be maintained at temperatures that meet the guidelines established by the Food and Drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program based upon current standards of practice, designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 47 residents. The facility's Water Management Plan (WMP) was not based on current standards of practice and did not: ~Reflect changes in program members. ~Include the Facility's Infection Preventionist (IP). ~revise WMP control measures after the closure of wing 1 ~have a defined flush program for little used outlets. ~have logs to monitor water temperatures. ~ include eye washing stations and ice machines in risk assessment. ~measure and record residual (free) disinfectant (Chlorine) levels. The Facility's Surveillance of the Infection and Control Program did not have: ~ a defined policy and procedure for staff illness. ~ a list of reportable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0638 — patternAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure quarterly assessments were completed as required for 6 (R27, R5, R44, R29, R25, & R50) of 12 residents reviewed for MDS (minimum data set). R27, R5, R44, R29, R25, & R50 did not have a quarterly MDS assessment completed within 92 days of their last MDS assessment. Findings include: On 7/17/24, at 1:13 p.m., Surveyor met with RN/MDS (Registered Nurse/Minimum Data Set)-G to inquire about the MDS's. Surveyor asked who completes the MDS. RN/MDS-G explained social service does sections C, D, & Q, the Dietitian does section K and activities does section F if the MDS is a comprehensive assessment. RN/MDS-G indicated she thinks she does all the rest of the sections. Surveyor inquired who submits the completed MDS. RN/MDS-G informed Surveyor Regional Consultant-H. Surveyor asked RN/MDS-G how Regional Consultant-H is aware of the MDS's that need to be submitted. RN/MDS-G informed Surveyor she usually checks or she tells her. Surveyor asked RN/MDS-G about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R42 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently re-admitted on [DATE]. R42's diagnosis include congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes, unstageable pressure ulcer to left heel, dependence on supplemental oxygen, weakness and acquired absence of right leg below knee. R42's plan of care states that R42 has diseases and conditions which are treated with medications. The goal is medication will be overseen and managed by the nursing and Physician team during the stay. Will remain free from any adverse effects due to medication over the next review period. Surveyor conducted a review of R42's medication regimen and reviewed the monthly pharmacy reviews. Surveyor requested to review the monthly reviews from pharmacy on 7/16/24. A copy of the June, 2024 pharmacy review was provided. The review was not signed or dated. Surveyor requested to review April and May, 2024 pharmacy reviews. 07/18/24 08:12 AM Surveyor was provided with copies of the MRR recommendations for R42 for April, May and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R44) of 12 residents was given the opportunity to be a part of their care planning process in regards to their personal belongings. Findings include: R44's diagnoses include multiple sclerosis, hypertension, anxiety, and is blind in the left eye. The quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an assessment reference date of 2/16/24 assesses R44's short and long term memory as ok. R44 has modified independence for cognitive skills for daily decision making. R44 is assessed as not having any behavior. R44 is independent with her activities of daily living. The potential of impaired psychosocial well being care plan documents the following approaches: * Provide emotional support and validate concerns/feelings PRN (as needed). Start date of 6/26/24. * Encourage/Facilitate development of peer relationships/participation in activities PRN. Start date of 6/26/24. The at risk for impaired adjustment to new environment care plan documents the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R29) of 12 Residents reviewed, notified R29's representative of R29 being transferred to the emergency room for an x-ray on 6/3/24 and the facility did not have consultation with R29's physician when scheduled pain medications were not being administered and the development of R29's stage 1 pressure ulcer to the coccyx. Findings Include: The facility's policy Change in a Resident's Condition or Status for Residents dated 12/2016 and last revised on 2/2022 documents: .Policy Statement Our community shall promptly notify the Resident, his or her health care provider, and representative of changes in the Resident's medical/mental condition and/or status\. Policy Interpretation and Implementation A. The nurse will notify the Resident's Health care provider or physician on call when there has bee a(an): 1. accident or incident involving the resident 2. discovery of injuries of an unknown source 3. adverse reaction to medication 4. significant change…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure 1 (R29) of 1 Residents with an injury of unknown origin was reported to the State Survey Agency. *Bruising to R29's left eye and left breast was noted on 5/2/24. On 5/16/24, bruising to the right eye, right foot, and a laceration between the right great toe and second toe is noted. R29's x ray documents that R29's right great toe is fractured and R29 required 2 stitches between the right great toe and second toe. The facility did not report the injuries of unknown origin from 5/2/24 and 5/16/24. Findings Include: The facility's policy Abuse Investigation and Reporting for Residents dated 9/2017 and last revised on 11/2023 documents: .Policy Statement All reports of Resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of Resident property, mistreatment, electronic mail, social media, videotaping, photographing, and other imaging of Residents, and/or injuries of unknown source(abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure all allegation involving potential abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of Resident property were thoroughly investigated for 1 (R29) of 4 reported events to the state survey agency. *Bruising to R29's left eye and left breast was noted on 5/2/24. On 5/16/24, bruising to the right eye, right foot, and a laceration between the right great toe and second toe is noted. R29's x ray documents that R29's right great toe is fractured and R29 requires 2 stitches between the right great toe and second toe. The facility did not report the injuries of unknown origin from 5/2/24 and 5/16/24 and a thorough investigation of the injuries was not completed. Findings Include: The facility's policy Abuse Investigation and Reporting for Residents dated 9/2017 and last revised on 11/2023 documents: .Policy Statement All reports of Resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of Resident property, mistreatment, electronic mail, social media,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, facility document review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 (R18 and R21) of 12 Residents reviewed for RAI regulatory timeframe's. *R18's Annual MDS was due 5/15/24, and was not completed and submitted until 7/18/24, during the recertification survey. *R21's Annual MDS was due 5/8/24, and was not completed and submitted until 7/15/24, during the recertification survey Findings included: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed an annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days). The RAI Manual specified the MDS completion date must be no later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R315) of 2 residents reviewed with an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and were provided dignity. Surveyor had several observations during survey of R315's catheter bag not covered in a privacy bag and was visible from the hallway. R315's care plan was not revised to indicate if R315 did not mind if R315's catheter bag was visible to others. Findings include: R315 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include encounter for surgical after care (placement of urostomy) following surgery on the digestive system, bowel obstruction, ESBL (extended spectrum beta-lactamase) infection, and weakness. R315's baseline care plan initiated on 7/12/2024 indicated R315 had intact cognition with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. R315 used a wheeled walker and limited assist of 1 staff member for transferring, mobility, and toileting. R315 was admitted with a urostomy and right arm PICC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure the necessary services to provide respiratory care were consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (R11) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care. R11's oxygen tubing was not labeled during survey. On 7/17/2024 R11's oxygen humidification was dry/empty. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled PROCEDURE: Oxygen Administration, last approved 12/2022, documents: Purpose- The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration.Steps in the Procedure- . K. Check the mask, tank, humidifying jar, etc., to be sure they are in good working order and are securely fastened. Be sure there is water in the humidifying jar and that the water level is high enough that the water bubbles as oxygen flows through. L. Label and date the humidifier bottle and oxygen tubing. N. Periodically re-check water level I the humidifying jar. R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-22 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 1 (R29) of 2 Residents reviewed for pain management received pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and Resident choice related to pain management. R29 was admitted to hospice on 4/24/23. R29 did not receive requested and prescribed pain medication as scheduled during a time that R29 had a right great toe fracture and a right distal femur fracture. Findings Include: The facility was unable to provide a policy and procedure in regards to pain management. R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Heart Failure, Anemia, Unspecified Dementia and Anxiety Disorder. R29 has an activated Health Care Power of Attorney (HCPOA) effective 9/16/2019. R29 has been receiving hospice service since 4/24/23. R29's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R29 has short and long term memory impairment and demonstrates severely impaired skills for daily decision making. R29's MDS also documents that R29 is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R5) of 5 residents did not receive unnecessary psychotropic medications. R5 has an order for Ativan 0.5 mg every eight hours as needed. There is no stop date and no documented rationale from the physician as to why it is appropriate to extend the PRN (as needed) order past 14 days. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication last revised 11/2022 under Policy Interpretation and Implementation documents: N. The need for continued PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The specific duration of the PRN order will be indicated in the order. O. PRN orders for psychotropic medications will not be renewed beyond 14 days unless the health care practitioner has evaluated the resident for the appropriateness of that medication. R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include multiple sclerosis,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not assist 1 (R29) of 1 resident reviewed for obtaining routine dental care. R29 has very few teeth, most are black in color and was not offered and did not receive dental services, resulting in being on a mechanically soft altered diet with tube feeding. Findings Include: The facility's policy Dental Services for Residents dated 6/2016 and last revised on 9/2018 documents: .Policy Statement Routine and emergency dental services are available to meet the Resident's oral health services in accordance with the Resident's evaluation and plan of care. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Oral health services are available to meet the Resident's needs. 3. Our community has a contract with a dentist that comes to the community and provides dental services. 4. Dental services are under the supervision of a licensed dentist retained by this community. 8. A complete record of the Resident's dental care and services are maintained in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0810 — isolatedProvide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not provide special assistive eating equipment for 1 of 1 sampled resident (R40) reviewed for assistive devices. R40 did not receive special assistive devices needed for assistance when consuming meals to maintain or improve their ability to eat or drink independently. Findings include: R40 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R40's medical diagnosis include: Parkinson's Disease, weakness, protein-calorie malnutrition, and Dysphasia. Surveyor reviewed R40's most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], which documents the following: R40 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which identifies R40 as being cognitively intact. R40 requires partial to moderate assistance with eating. R40 had a recent prolonged hospitalization from 03/24/24 through 05/10/2024 and was again hospitalized from [DATE] through 06/14/2024. Surveyor reviewed a document titled: nutrition risk assessment, signed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the Facility did not ensure hospice services were coordinated for 2 (R5 & R29) of 2 residents reviewed for hospice. * Hospice visit notes were not kept in R5's medical record or in R5's hospice binder which was located in the nurses station. * R29's recertification was not complete and there was not list of assigned staff from hospice with contact information. There is not a designated facility liaison with hospice. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Hospice Program last revised 12/2017 under Policy Interpretation and Implementation documents: D. When a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the community, hospice agency and resident/representative will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. The care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status. 1.) R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure pharmaceutical services including accurate acquiring and administering of medications to meet the needs of each Resident for 1 (R8) of 3 Residents reviewed. R8 returned to the facility from the emergency room (ER) on 2/24/24 with a MD (Medical Doctor) order for Ciprofloxacin HCL (an antibiotic medication used to treat infection) to be given 2 times a day for 10 days. R8 did not receive the morning dose of Ciprofloxacin (Cipro) on 2/25/24. On the morning of 2/26/24, the nurse caring for R8 was an agency nurse and did not have access to the Cubex (automated medication dispensing system) where they could have retrieved the necessary medication. R8 did not receive the morning dose of Cipro on 2/26/24. Findings include: The facility policy, entitled Administering Medications, with a revision date of 12/2021, states, in part: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed . Medications shall be administered in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible or resident preferences indicate otherwise for 1 (R2) of 5 residents reviewed for weights. R2's weight was not being monitored according to facility policy or dietary technician and R2's edema was not consistently monitored to see if edema was getting worse. Findings include: The facility policy entitled Weight Monitoring revised on 1/2023 states: It is the policy of [Facility Name] that appropriate nutritional care shall be provided to residents who have significant weight change. A significant weight change is identified as a weight loss or gain of 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days, or 10% in 180 days. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: A. Each resident should be weighed daily for the first three days of admission, weekly for the first four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 (R4) of 2 residents reviewed for receiving enteral feeding. R4 received a bolus tube feeding and the gastrostomy tube (G tube) was not checked for placement prior to the feeding. Findings: The facility policy and procedure entitled Procedure: Enteral Feeding - Safety Precautions dated 1/2024 states: . Preventing aspiration: A. Check enteral tube placement prior to each feeding and administration of medication. R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cancer of the oropharynx resulting in getting the majority of nutrition through a G-tube with some oral intake, depression, dementia, Wernicke's encephalopathy, anxiety, and renal cancer. R4's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated R4 was severely cognitively impaired; receives tube feeding and a mechanically altered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record the Facility did not ensure 2 (CNA-S and CNA-T) of 5 randomly sampled CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant), who are currently employed, had documented annual performance evaluations. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 1/17/23, CNA-S and CNA-T's performance evaluations were requested. CNA-S was hired 11/15/23 and did not complete any required performance evaluations, such as dementia training and abuse prevention training. CNA-T was hired on 2/4/19 and did not complete any required annual performance evaluations, such as dementia training and abuse prevention training. On 1/17/24, at 11:00 a.m., Surveyor asked Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A if there were any more training or in-services conducted because CNA-S and CNA-T did not have their required evaluations completed. NHA-A stated he would look for more. On 1/17/24, at 12:00 p.m. NHA-A stated he understands the concern but did not have any additional information.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure appropriate and safe administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R3) of 10 sampled residents. On 10/3/23, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G apply topical Hydrocortisone (a medication used to treat skin conditions) on R3. In addition, R3 kept the Hydrocortisone in a bag on R3's bed. R3 did not have a physician's order for Hydrocortisone. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications policy, last revised on 12/2021, indicates: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed .A. Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer and document the administration of medications may do so .C. Medications shall be administered in accordance with the orders .W. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the Attending Physician, in conjunction with the nurse assessment, has determined that they have the capacity to do…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure it was free of a medication error rate of 5% or greater. During medication administration observations, 22 errors occurred during 26 opportunities which resulted in a 84.6% medication error rate affecting 3 Residents (R) (R6, R7 and R8) of 3 residents observed during medication pass. R6's 8:00 AM medications (8 medications) were administered at 10:16 AM. R7's 8:00 AM medications (9 medications) were administered at 10:23 AM. R8's 8:00 AM medications (5 medications) were administered at 9:59 AM. Findings include: The facility's Administering Medications document, revised 12/2021, indicates: Medications shall be administered as ordered .The individual administering the medications must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 1. On 10/4/23 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-C administer the following medications to R6: Midodrine 5 mg…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, staff did not perform proper hand hygiene during the provision of cares for 2 Residents (R) (R3 and R1) of 3 residents. On 10/3/23, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G did not consistently perform hand hygiene during the provision of care for R3. On 10/5/23, CNA-E did not consistently perform hand hygiene during the provision of care for R3. On 10/4/23, CNA-D did not consistently perform hand hygiene during the provision of care for R1. Findings include: The facility's Hand Hygiene policy, last revised on 5/2023, indicates: This community considers hand hygiene the single most important practice to prevent infections and promote resident safety. Evidence based hand hygiene guidance is practiced to reduce the risk of transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to residents, associates, and visitors .A. Associates are trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to implement their facility policy and procedure to safeguard residents from abuse by monitoring visitation for 1 (R118) of 3 residents who was previously abused by a visitor. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy, titled, Abuse Prevention, last revised in June 2020, indicated, Ensure the health and safety of each resident with regard to visitors such as family members or resident representatives, friends or other individuals subject to the resident's right to deny or withdraw consent at any time and to reasonable clinical and safety restrictions. The policy indicated in the section titled, Reporting/Response, that the facility would, D. Implement interventions as a result of the investigation. In the section titled, Monitoring and Follow Up, the policy indicated, A. Monitoring, documentation and applicable interventions will be completed by clinical associates. Review of R118's Profile Face Sheet indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-01 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, facility document review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a comprehensive annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 (R32) of 22 residents reviewed for RAI regulatory timeframe's. Findings included: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed an annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days). The RAI Manual specified the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the ARD [Assessment Reference Date] (ARD + 14 calendar days). A review of the facility's Incomplete MDS List for the time period of 03/01/2022 through 03/31/2023 revealed R32's comprehensive annual MDS assessment, with an ARD of 02/22/2023, was not completed until 03/30/2023, which was 36 days after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-01 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 (R275) of 22 residents reviewed for RAI regulatory timeframe's. Findings included: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed a significant change in status MDS assessment is required to be performed when a terminally ill resident enrolls in a hospice program (Medicare-certified or State-licensed hospice provider) or changes hospice providers and remains a resident at the nursing home. The ARD [Assessment Reference Date] must be within 14 days from the effective date of the hospice election. A review of R275's Profile Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses which included multiple sclerosis and severe protein-calorie…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-01 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, facility document review, and review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, it was determined that the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 (R12 and R47) of 22 residents reviewed for RAI regulatory timeframe's. Findings included: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services [CMS] Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument [RAI] 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2019, revealed a quarterly assessment is a non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA [Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act] assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessments to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored. The RAI Manual specified the MDS completion date must be no later than 14 days after the ARD [Assessment Reference Date] (ARD + 14 calendar days). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care and fingernail care for 2 (R8 and R36) of 5 sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings included: On 04/01/2023 at 8:29 AM, facility policies addressing nail care, frequency of incontinence care, and ADLs were requested. The Administrator-A stated the facility did not have policies addressing these areas. 1. A review of R8's Profile Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted R8 with diagnoses that included acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), hypertension, and anemia. A review of R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to ensure physician-ordered medications were provided by the pharmacy and available for administration for 2 (R6 and R274) of 7 residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings included: A review of the facility policy, titled, Medication Administration, with an effective date of 06/21/2017, indicated, 9. If a medication is unavailable, contact the pharmacy and document accordingly. 1. A review of the Profile Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted R6 with diagnoses that included a displaced spiral fracture of the left femur, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, restless leg syndrome, and weakness. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. According to the MDS, R6 received scheduled and as needed pain medication. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-01 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5% or less for 2 (R6 and R26) of 7 residents observed during medication administration. Observation of medication passes revealed two medication errors out of 26 opportunities, which resulted in a medication error rate of 7.69%. Findings included: A review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration Policy - 5.3 General Guidelines for Medication Administration, dated of 06/21/2017, revealed, Medication will be administered by legally authorized and trained persons in accordance to [sic] applicable State, Local and Federal laws and consistent with accepted standards of practice. Step 4 of the Procedure section of the policy indicated, Read the label comparing to the MAR [Medication Administration Record] before preparing the medication. If the medication is discontinued or outdated, remove medication for proper disposal. Facility should follow any State specific regulatory requirements in regard [sic] medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-08-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that a licensed nurse was designated to serve as a charge nurse on each tour of duty.Surveyor reviewed last 30 days of facility nursing schedules and nurse staff postings. Surveyor noted that the facility did not designate a charge nurse for each tour of duty on each daily nursing schedule.This deficient practice has the potential to affect a pattern of all 41 residents residing in the facility.Findings include:On 8/18/2025, Surveyor reviewed the last 30 days of facility nursing schedules and nurse staff postings from 7/18/2025 to 8/18/2025. Surveyor noted that the facility did not designate a charge nurse for each daily nursing schedule for any of the schedules reviewed from 7/18/2025 to 8/18/2025.On 8/19/2025 at 10:11 AM, Surveyor interviewed Scheduler-K. Surveyor asked Scheduler-K if they were aware that there was not a charge nurse designated on the facility's nursing schedules from 7/18/2025 to 8/18/2025. Scheduler-K told Surveyor that they were unaware that it was a requirement to designate a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$219,651 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $42,680 — penalty dated 2026-01-06
- $72,873 — penalty dated 2025-04-01
- $71,858 — penalty dated 2024-07-22
- $32,240 — penalty dated 2024-01-17
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-05-02 for 4 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-20 for 31 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASCENSION LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 3.9 | -1.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 3.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCENSION HEALTH SENIOR CARE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 07/01/2014 |
| MUSGRAVE, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SHADBOLT, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SMOOT, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MARTHIENS, EDGAR | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/16/2022 |
| SIDHU, SARFRAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2025 |
| HOUSE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2025 |
| MEDICAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/14/2017 |
| METIS LTC LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2024 |
| MICHAEL PORTER | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/09/2021 |
| NURSING CENTERS, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/03/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $806K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525552. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.