Franciscan Woods
19525 W North Ave, Brookfield, WI 53045 · Non profit - Corporation · 110 certified beds · (262) 785-1114 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $120,905 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (76%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.9% | 16.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.9% | 5.1% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 2.1% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 2.7% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.6% | 5.7% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 34.4% | 18.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.4% | 16.9% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.7% | 5.0% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.8% | 24.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 15.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.8% | 82.2% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 23.1% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.8% | 15.5% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 176 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 64.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 52.5%CMS range 45.8–58.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 8.0–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 64.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 48.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 44.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 85.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.2%CMS range 2.9–8.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 55.3 residents a day — about 50% occupied, or roughly 55 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.15 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 76% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
50 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 (R2) of 2 residents reviewed with pressure injuries. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes. There is no documentation the facility was performing daily diabetic foot checks as documented in R2's care plan. R2's care plan does not document person centered interventions of turning and repositioning when R2 is assessed to be dependent on the staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). On 11/1/25, R2's family notified the facility of R2 having bilateral heel pressure injuries. The facility documented the size and location of a left heel pressure injury but did not complete an assessment of R2's right heel prior to R2's transfer to the hospital. R2 was sent to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Dementia, Palliative care, Anxiety, Depression, Muscle contracture of right and left knee. R7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents R7 is severely cognitively impaired. R7 is dependent for all cares and transfers. R7 requires substantial/maximum assist for bed mobility. R7 is at risk for pressure injuries but does not have a current pressure injury. R7 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder. R7 has an activated healthcare Power of Attorney (POA) and is currently on hospice. R7's Pressure Ulcer/Injury Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 8/16/24 documents, in part: Pressure ulcers CAA triggered secondary to potential and presence of actual pressure ulcer . Contributing factors include [activity of daily living]/functional mobility impairment, actual pressure ulcer, cognitive loss and use of medications that can contribute to skin breakdown, incontinence and pain. R7's Braden Score…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2025-03-20 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not ensure residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 (R6) of 1 resident reviewed for weight loss. R6 experienced severe weight loss over a period of 6 months, during which time R6 developed pressure injuries. The weight loss was not prescribed, and no new interventions were implemented to prevent R6's weight loss. Surveyor was unable to locate any documentation that the Facility updated the Power of Attorney or R6's physician. Findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled, Nutritional Screening, Assessment, and Monitoring and last revised 11/2022, documents, in part: Policy Statement It is the policy of Ascension Living that a comprehensive nutritional assessment is completed upon admission, annually, or when a significant change occurs for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation A. The RD (Registered Dietician) should complete a comprehensive nutritional assessment on each resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, and the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for that 1 (R3) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R3 did not receive pressure injury treatments for a pressure injury that was discovered during admission. There was no evidence that R3's physician was notified of R3's newly discovered pressure injury and there was a delay in implementing pressure relieving interventions and pressure injury treatments for R3. During this delay, R3's pressure injury increased in size and the condition deteriorated while they were not receiving treatment and interventions. Findings include: The facility procedure titled Pressure Injury Assessment/Treatment dated as last approved July 2024 documents (in part): .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for a consistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of two sampled residents (Resident (R)185) reviewed for tube feeding was provided with tube feeding administration in accordance with physician's orders. The facility failed to administer the prescribed formula and failed to ensure medication (pills) were crushed. R185 was hospitalized on [DATE] with a clogged feeding tube. The facility staff administered R185 medications in a pill form that were not sufficiently crushed which clogged the feeding tube. R185 was hospitalized and a surgical procedure was necessary to unclog the feeding tube due to the pill lodged in the tube. Findings include: Review of the facility's Enteral Nutrition (tube feeding) policy dated 01/2024 and provided by the facility revealed, Adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding should be provided to the resident as ordered . The nurse should confirm that there are appropriate orders for oral (PO) intake or restrictions for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program based upon current standards of practice, designed to provide a safe environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 51 residents. The facility was not monitoring infections, tracking and trending infections and monthly infection rates were not completed in the facility for 2025. In November 2025, the facility did not have any documentation of monitoring infections, surveillance, tracking and trending of infections were not completed, and infection rates were not completed. The facility had a Covid 19 outbreak in September 2025, and the infectious outbreak was not thoroughly investigated. The facility does not have a sink in the laundry room and staff are using a sink located across the hallway. This prevents the laundry workflow from being free of cross contamination. R8 and R51 had an enteric precautions sign and supply cart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they implemented an effective antibiotic stewardship program with the potential to affect all 51 residents in the facility. Review of the facility infection surveillance logs for residents on antibiotics, indicate antibiotic use without documentation of appropriate use, surveillance, and tracking information. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship, dated 01/2018, last revised 06/2025, documents: The Ascension Living antibiotic stewardship program's goals are to promote resident safety with the appropriate use of antibiotics, improve resident outcomes and reduce antibiotic resistance and adverse events.Antibiotics shall be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the community's antibiotic stewardship program.The antibiotic stewardship program shall be incorporated in the overall infection prevention and control program and reviewed on an annual basis and as needed.The antibiotic stewardship program promotes appropriate use of antibiotics for quality of care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that a written consent explaining the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications was obtained for 2 (R10 and R11) of 5 Residents who's medication records were reviewed. *R11 was prescribed Lorazepam, a benzodiazepine that works in the brain to relieve symptoms of anxiety. The facility did not have a signed consent explaining the risks and benefits of Lorazepam. *R10 was prescribed Zyprexa, an antipsychotic medication that helps regulate mood, behaviors and thoughts. The facility did not have a signed consent explaining the risks and benefits of Zyprexa. Findings Include: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Medication Monitoring, effective date 6/21/2017, documents: Policy: A resident's medication regimen shall promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being, as identified by the resident and/or representative(s) in collaboration with the attending physician and facility staff.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 3 (R5, R8 and R9) of 4 residents reviewed for transfers or discharges received the proper written notice of transfer, written bed hold policy with reserve bed payment identified and that proper notification was sent to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. * R5 was transferred to the hospital on 9/14/25 and 10/20/25, for evaluation due to a change in condition with no evidence of written bed hold notice and transfer notice provided to R5. The State Ombudsman was not sent a copy of the notices. * R8 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], while residing in the facility and evidence was not provided that R8 or their representative were notified in writing of the reason for the transfer/discharge to the hospital and the facility policy for bed hold, including reserve bed payment. * R9 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on [DATE], while residing in the facility and evidence was not provided that R9 or their representative…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition and assistance with meals for 1 of 15 (R1) residents observed during meals.R1's meal tray was not set up and R1 was not positioned upright to eat and R1 was not provided assistance with meals per R1's plan of care.Findings include:R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include progressive Multiple Sclerosis, quadriplegia, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, sepsis, hypertension, acute respiratory failure, history of pulmonary embolism, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, kidney calculus, obsessive compulsive disorder, kidney failure, pressure injuries stage 3, trigeminal neuralgia, adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood, Irritable Bowel Syndrome and anemia. The facility policy titled Assistance with meals revised 1/2025 documents: It is the policy of (facility) that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person centered care plan for the followed for 1 (R10) of 5 residents reviewed.R10's physician order for daily weights every day and to notify provider if greater than 3 pound change in one day or greater than 5 pounds in a week was not implemented per R10's physicians order. occur. Findings include:The facility policy and procedure for the weight monitoring effective 07/2025, documents in part: Policy: It is the policy of [facility name] that appropriate nutritional care shall be provided to residents who have significant weight change. A significant weight change is identified as a weight loss or gain of 5% in 30 days, 7.5% in 90 days or 10% in 180 days.Procedure:A nursing or nutrition associate should notify the health care provider of any significant weight change that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with pressure injuries or at risk for pressure injury development received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of pressure injuries and to promote healing for 1 (R12) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries.* R12 was admitted to the facility with a sling to the left arm. There is no evidence of monitoring the skin under the sling and R12 developed an unstageable pressure injury that declined to a stage 4 pressure injury to R12's left elbow with exposed hardware. Interventions were not implemented timely to prevent R12's pressure injury from developing/ declining.Findings include:The facility policy titled Prevention of Pressure Injuries Protocol last approved 1/2026 documents: Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding identification of pressure injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (R9) of 1 residents reviewed for smoking.*R9 smokes and the facility lacked ongoing smoking supervision and assessments or a cessation program.The facility's policy and procedure titled, Smoking Policy-Residents, last revised 10/2025 documents in part: Policy Statement- This policy is established to maintain safe resident smoking practices in accordance with the fire safety regulations. Residents who wish to smoke on the community premises should comply with the requirements in the policy. Smoking is defined as a practice in which a substance, most commonly tobacco, is burned and the smoke is tasted or inhaled. This policy applies to the use of all smoking materials, consumed by cigarette, pipe, vaporizers, electronic cigarettes and other vapor devices.F. The resident should be evaluated on admission to determine smoking preference. If the resident prefers to smoke, the evaluation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R8) of 1 residents who is fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complication from enteral feeding.R8 received an enteral feed and a flush was not done prior to starting the feeding per R8's physician order. Findings:The facility policy and procedure titled Enteral Nutrition last approved 1/2026, documents: Policy Statement: Adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding should be provided to residents as ordered.C. The Dietitian, with input from the Physician and Nurse, should:1. Estimate calorie, protein, nutrient and fluid needs.4. Calculate fluids to be provided.The facility policy and procedure titled Enteral Tube Feeding Via Continuous Pump last approved 1/2026, documents, in part: PurposeThe purpose of this procedure is to provide nourishment to the resident who is unable to obtain nourishment orally.Steps in the Procedure.J. When correct tube placement has been verified, flush…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services for 1 (R55) of 15 residents reviewed.R55 was not provided multiple medications per physician orders and not signed out as given on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated January 2026 through April 2026.Findings include:The facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated 6/21/17, documents: Medications will be administered by legally authorized and trained persons in accordance to applicable state, local and federal laws and consistent with accepted standards of practice.R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Multiple Sclerosis (MS) (chronic autoimmune disease that attacks the nerve fibers affecting the brain, spinal cord, and optic nerves), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (a serious mental health condition characterized by persistent, intense feelings of sadness, worthlessness, and a loss of interest in activities), encephalopathy (damage or dysfunction that alters the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 35 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were be labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and included the expiration date when applicable for 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed.Medication carts contained insulin that was not dated when opened and/or was expired.Findings include:The facility policy titled Insulin Administration effective [DATE] documents:Insulin is a high-risk drug and warrants additional precautions for the safe and effective administration. Insulin administration is performed by licensed nurses. Facility nursing procedures supersede this procedure if present.6. Follow the manufacturer's instruction for storage and expiration. Ensure that the opened date is documented on the vial or pen.7. Check the expiration date prior to administration to ensure it is within the usage date. Expired insulin should be immediately discarded. Vials and pens without an open date recorded should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's hospice notes were readily available for communication and collaboration of care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 (R11) of 1 residents reviewed for hospice services.Hospice visit notes were not updated in R11's medical record or in R11's hospice binder.Findings include:The facility's policy and procedure titled, Hospice Program, last approved 12/2025, documents, in part: Policy Interpretation and Implementation.D. When a resident participates in the hospice program, a coordinated plan of care between the community, hospice agency and resident/resident representative will be developed and shall include directives for managing pain and other uncomfortable symptoms. The care plan shall be revised and updated as necessary to reflect the resident's current status.The contract titled Nursing Facility Services Agreement (Basic, Respite and General Inpatient Care for Hospice Patients) signed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 (R10) of 5 residents reviewed were offered/administered the influenza vaccination. R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not contain any documentation as to whether R10 was offered, received or declined the influenza immunization. Findings include: The facility's policy titled Clinical Protocol: Influenza Vaccine, dated 09/2018, last revised 09/2022 documents: Residents who have no medical contraindications to the vaccine will be offered the influenza vaccine annually to encourage and promote the benefits associated with vaccinations against influenza. A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented in the resident's medical record. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes Alzheimer's Disease (progressive irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (lung disease that makes breathing difficult causing airflow obstruction) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure medical records contained documentation related to COVID-19 (Coronavirus disease 2019) immunizations for 1 (R10) of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. R10's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) does not contain any documentation as to whether R10 was offered, received or declined the COVID-19 immunization. Findings include: The facility's policy titled COVID-19, dated 06/2020, last revised 06/2025 documents: Residents will be offered the COVID-19 vaccination to remain up to date with the most current Center for Disease Control (CDC) vaccination schedule. If a resident/resident legal representative wishes to receive the COVID-19 vaccination, the facility will obtain the consent and provide the vaccination to the resident as soon as it is available in alignment with the vaccination schedule. R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that includes Alzheimer's Disease (progressive irreversible brain disorder that slowly destroys memory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure the medication error rate was below 5% during medication pass. Surveyor observed 20 out of 32 opportunities with a medication error rate of 62.5%. On 12/18/25, Surveyor observed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)- E stab 20 bubble packs with a pen for 2 (R8 and R9) of 4 residents during medication administration. Findings include: On 12/18/25, at 7:54 AM, Surveyor observed LPN-E administer medications to R9. R9 was administered 8 medication that included:Amlodipine 5 mg tabletCertravite (Multivitamin) 1 tabletFolic Acid 1 mg tabletHydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg tabletTurmeric 500 mg tabletVitamin B complex 1 tabletThiamine 100 mg tabletVitamin C 500 mg tabletSurveyor observed each medication to be individually wrapped in a bubble packet and observed LPN-E lay out all 8 bubble packs on top of the medication cart and press the button on her pen to expose the ballpoint on the pen and stab each individual packet with the open ball point pen. LPN-E then placed each bubble pack over a medicine cup to push out the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to prevent the physical abuse of one resident (Resident (R) 1) out of three residents reviewed for abuse out of a total sample of eight residents. This resulted in harm when R1 sustained a bruise to her wrist as well as emotional upset when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 held her arms down while providing care. Findings include:Review of the Resident Information located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE].Review of R1's Care Plan, dated 07/23/25 located under the Clinical tab in the EMR, revealed R1 had impaired behavior related to refusal of cares, noncompliant with treatments, dressing changes to wounds, double and/or triple briefing, and showers. Resident is physically aggressive with staff as evidenced by slapping staff. Staff were directed to discourage double briefing due to build up of moisture. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure 3 (R14 R16, and R23) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. * R14 sustained two falls from R14's bed, 4/07/25 and 4/28/25. Staff did not to follow R14's care plan requiring 2-person assistance with bed mobility. Both falls required R14 to be transporter to the ER (emergency room) for evaluation after hitting R14's head. On 4/7/25, R14 was evaluated in the ER for 2 hematomas on R14's forehead and left cheek. On 4/28/25 R14 was evaluated in the ER (emergency room) for a bump on the back of R14's head. *R16's care plan documents the need for assist of 2 staff for transfers. R16 reported staff picked them up by the biceps and without a gait belt for a transfer and they experienced pain. The facility self report documented all staff would received education on transfers to prevent future falls. The re-education did not occur. *R23's care plan documents the need for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to ensure medications were available to be administered as ordered by their physician to meet their medical needs for 1 (R15) of 3 residents. R15 has an order to receive Ingrezza 40 mg (milligrams) once daily for Tardive Dyskinesia (uncontrolled involuntary muscle movements). R15 did not receive this medication on 12/3/24 & from 12/13/24 to 12/24/24. On 2/3/25 R15's Ingrezza was increased to 60 mg daily. R15 did not receive the correct dose of Ingrezza from 2/3/25 to 2/9/25. Findings include: R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses includes congestive heart failure (heart doesn't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs), morbid obesity, drug induced subacute Dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary muscle movements) and major depressive disorder. R15's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] includes Valbenazine Tosylate (Ingrezza) 40 mg (milligrams) with direction to take 40 mg by mouth daily. R15's nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure monitoring for adverse reactions to a high risk medication were implemented for 1 (R22) of 3 residents. R22 receives Eliquis (anticoagulant) 5 mg (milligram) every 12 hours for DVT (deep vein thrombosis) (blood clot) prophylaxis. The facility was not monitoring for presence of bleeding. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Anticoagulant and last revised 12/2017 under the section Monitoring and Follow-Up documents E. The associates and physician will monitor for possible complications in individuals who are being anticoagulated, and will mange related problems. R22's diagnoses includes history of pulmonary embolism (condition where one or more arteries in the lungs are blocked by a blood clot) and long term use of anticoagulant. R22's physician orders with an order date of 4/8/24 documents Eliquis 5 mg (milligram) tablet [Apixaban] - 5 mg by mouth every 12 hours for DVT prophylaxis. R22's care plan [R22's first name] is at risk for complications from blood thinning medications. List names of medication(s): on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not have documentation for investigating, and controlling, an outbreak. The facility did not document infection organisms for surveillance prevention. This had the potential to effect all 84 residents in the facility. * The facility had an influenza A outbreak in February 2025. There is no documented investigation summary for identifying, preventing and controlling, the spread of infection. * The facility on-going surveillance does not identify infection organisms. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedures Outbreak of Communicable Diseases dated 1/2024. The policy documents: The outbreaks of communicable diseases within the the community (facility) will be promptly identified and appropriately handled. The facility's policy and procedures Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 8/2024. The policy document includes: The Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) is designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility did not implement their written policies and procedures for investigating, and reporting, allegations of abuse. This was observed with 3 (R11, R10 and R9) of 3 residents reviewed with allegations of abuse. The facility did not implement a documented, comprehensive investigative process for determining abuse which has the potential to effect all 84 residents in the facility. *R11 asked to be changed and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) -V stated they just started their shift and would be back, and eventually, came back. CNA-V told R11 to quit looking at the clock to see how long it's been. CNA-V told R11 to turn their light, and television off, and go to bed, however R11 wanted these on. CNA-V told R11 just because their old doesn't mean they can't learn. R11 said ouch during cares provided by CNA-V. CNA-V told R11 they are not going to help them if they keep saying ouch. * Facility Grievance Log documents R10 reported a poor interaction with a CNA on 1/29/25. A facility email by corporate human resources documents: CNA-V went…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3.) Surveyor reviewed a facility email which documented R11's concern with the care provided by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-V. The email documented R11 asked to be changed and CNA-V stated they just started their shift and would be back, and eventually came back. CNA-V told R11 to quit looking at the clock to see how long it's been. CNA-V told R11 to turn their light and television off, and go to bed, however R11 wanted these on. CNA-V told R11 just because their old doesn't mean they can't learn. R11 said ouch during cares by CNA-V. CNA-V told R11 they are not going to help them if they keep saying ouch. On 3/20/25, at 11:23 AM, Director of Nursing (DON)-B provided Surveyor an email correspondence between corporate human resources and Unit Manager (UM)- E. DON-B was also included in the email correspondence. The email, dated 1/29/25, documents R11's concerns regarding CNA-V. The email is the only documentation of R11's care concerns related to CNA-V. DON-B stated they did not have any additional…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) On 3/18/25 Surveyor obtained, and reviewed, the facility Grievance Log. The Log documents: The date, resident, department assigned, room number, who voiced concern and summary of concern with resolved date. On 1/14/25 (R12) stated they did not like their interactions with on of the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA). The Nurse Manager spoke with the CNA and that CNA was no longer assigned to the resident. (R12) also stated that they only are receiving 20 minutes of therapy per session. Discussed therapy session durations with therapy and (R12). Social Service (SS) followed up with (R12) regarding therapy and (R12) stated it was getting better and denied further concerns. Concern resolved 1/16/25. On 3/18/25, at 3:00 PM, at the facility exit meeting with Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) - A and Director of Nurses (DON) - B, Surveyor requested the investigation for R12's concerns. On 3/19/25, the facility had placed in the conference room, 10 interview sheets dated 1/15/25. The interview questions were related…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were reported to the Administrator, and the State Survey Agency, as required. This was observed with 3 (R11, R10 and R9) of 3 residents reviewed for alleged abuse. *R11 alleged she asked to be changed and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) - V stated they just started their shift and would be back, and eventually, came back. CNA-V told R11 to quit looking at the clock to see how long it's been. CNA-V told R11 to turn their light, and television off, and go to bed, however R11 wanted these on. CNA-V told R11 just because their old doesn't mean they can't learn. R11 said ouch during cares provided by CNA-V. CNA-V told R11 they are not going to help them if they keep saying ouch. There is no evidence these concerns/interactions were reported to the Nursing Home Administrator and the State Survey Agency. *R10 reported a poor interaction with a CNA on 1/29/25. A facility email by corporate human resources documents: CNA-V went into R10's room to change them, at midnight, and told R10 not to call…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-20 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not comprehensively assess a resident before applying bed mobility devices. This was observed with 1 (R9) of 1 residents observed with bed mobility devices. * R9 was observed with bilateral bed mobility devices. There was not a comprehensive assessment completed. Findings include: The facility's policy and procedure Device Evaluation Form dated 1/2024. The policy documents: Any resident for whom a safety or assistive is being considered will have a Device Evaluation form completed and reviewed by the interdisciplinary team. On 3/19/25, at 12:35 AM, Surveyor observed R9 in their bed. The bed had bilateral mobility devices. R9's medical record documents in the Progress Notes: on 3/13/25 (R9) was readmitted from the hospital and is alert and oriented. (R9's) family requested bed railings on the bed. The bed rails will be installed tomorrow by maintenance. The Maintenance Work Order, dated 3/13/25, documents bed mobility devices were installed on R9's bed. R9's Device Evaluation form, dated 3/16/25, indicates no device…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2.) R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include lumbar compression fracture, Depression, Dementia and moderate malnutrition. Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. The facility admission observation/evaluation form dated 1/21/25 documented no skin impairments. Facility progress notes dated 1/23/25 documented R2 had increased combativeness, increased agitation during PM shift, husband witnessed and apologetic for behaviors. Facility progress note dated 1/24/24 documented a left forearm skin tear 3 x 3 x 0.1. 100% flap. Steri strips placed, foam border dressing - change 3 times a week or PRN (as needed). Surveyor noted the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) did not include treatment orders for the skin tear and there was no other documentation in the nursing progress notes regarding the skin tear. Facility progress note dated 1/31/24 documented a new order left forearm skin tear: Xerofoam, bordered foam dressing change 3 times a week and PRN. Keflex 500 milligrams four times daily x 5 days for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for anticoagulant medication were free from unnecessary medications. * R1 received warfarin (anticoagulant) without adequate monitoring by ensuring PT/INR (prothrombin time test and international normalized ration) labs were conducted. On 12/25/24 R1 had orders for the lab to draw a PT (PT)/International Normalized Ratio (INR). The lab was not drawn until 12/31/24 and R1 was given his Warfarin from 12/23/24 to 12/31/24. R1's results from the PT/INR on 12/31/24 was 5.8 which was above therapeutic level of 2-3. (A high PT/INR level indicates the blood is clotting more slowly than normal.) Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including left femur fracture with surgical intervention, history of cerebral infarct and longtime use of anticoagulants. R1's care plan, initiated 1/3/25, documented, Potential for complications from blood thinning medications due to warfarin, with a goal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 (R185) residents reviewed for medications. R185 did not receive an antibiotic as indicated on the hospital discharge summary. Findings include: R185 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include small bowel obstruction, hypertension, acute kidney injury superimposed on chronic kidney disease, Failure to thrive, demand ischemia and Peripheral Artery Disease. R185 discharged to the hospital for a clogged gastrostomy tube on 11/11/24 and did not return to the facility. Surveyor asked DON (Director of Nursing)-B for a facility policy and procedure regarding admission orders and transcribing of orders. DON-B reported the facility did not have a policy related to admission orders or transcribing orders. DON-B provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure there were sufficient staff adequately deployed to meet six out of 26 sampled residents needs (Resident (R)186, R40, R15, R45, R27, and R184). Residents were double briefed, waited too long for call lights to be answered, did not get timely incontinence care/toileting, showers, or the provision of hygiene. Residents remained in bed due to the fear staff would not put them back to bed in time if they got up. Agency staff (internal pool and outside pool) were frequently used. Residents, families, and staff reported agency staff were not well trained/aware of residents' needs. Findings include: 1. Review of the undated Profile Face Sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and muscle weakness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff adhered to proper glove use/hand hygiene when serving meals to 15 residents residing on the west side of the second floor. This created the potential for cross contamination and spread of food borne illness. Findings include: Review of the facility's Disposable Glove Use policy dated 01/2023 and provided by the facility revealed, Disposable gloves must be changed, and hands washed when the gloves are dirty or ripped and when moving from one task to another . Observation on 11/11/24 at 9:02 AM of meal service in the kitchenette on the west side of the second floor. Dietary Aide (DA)1 was serving food from a steam table to residents who resided on the west side of the second floor. DA1 dished up three plates of breakfast which included scrambled eggs and breakfast meat. DA1 scooped the scrambled eggs and meat onto these plates and then repositioned the food on the plate using her gloved hands. In between touching the ready to eat food, she touched the paper tray cards, plates, and utensils.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, record review, policy review, and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance, the facility failed to ensure that staff wore appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for two of 18 residents (Resident (R)15, and 40) reviewed for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when direct care was provided. The facility staff failed to clean and disinfect patient equipment used for three of eight residents (R24, R48, and R68) reviewed for infection control. These failures could promote the spread of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) throughout the facility. Findings include: 1. Review of R40's undated admission Record in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission date of 04/08/19 and diagnosis of moderate protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of R40's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 08/16/24, located in the EMR MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15 which indicated R40 was severely cognitively impaired. During an observation in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 26 sampled residents' (Resident (R)40) Responsible Party (RP) was notified of changes in condition for R40. Specifically, the RP was not notified when R40 developed a new pressure injury and when he sustained purple marks to his right arm pit. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's condition or Status dated 01/2024 and provided by the facility revealed, Our community shall promptly notify the resident, his or her health care provider, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status . The nurse will notify the resident's health care provider or physician on call when there has been a (an): 1. Accident or incident involving the resident; 2. Discover of injuries of an unknown source; . 4. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition . Review of the undated Profile Face Sheet in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to address a grievance from the Responsible Party (RP) regarding the care for one of 26 sample residents (Resident (R)186). This created the potential for R186's needs to go unmet. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Complaints and Grievances dated 05/2023 and provided by the facility revealed, It is the policy of Ascension Living to provide residents and family members/legal representative the opportunity to voice complaints and grievances . Such complaints or grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished . Definitions . Grievance - Any moderately complex complaint or service issue received verbally or in writing from residents or resident representative regarding treatment or services that require intervention and a written resolution letter. All written complaints received by residents or resident representatives through any means…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that a written transfer notice was provided to a resident and the resident's responsible party when one of one resident (R)23) reviewed for hospitalization was transferred to the hospital. This had the potential to affect the resident and the resident's responsible party understanding the reason for the transfer and the resident's right to appeal. Findings include: During an interview on 11/11/24 at 10:37 AM, R23 stated she went to the hospital. She stated she did not remember the date that she was sent to the hospital and that she did not remember receiving a written transfer notice. Review of R23's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/07/24 and located in the MDS tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of R23's progress notes located in the ID notes section of the EMR revealed a nurse's note dated 08/23/24 and at 11:14 PM which indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two out of four sampled residents (Resident (R)40 and R186) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS) were provided with adequate assistance to maintain cleanliness and hygiene. R186 and R40 were not provided with adequate assistance with toileting, incontinence care, and baths/showers. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Clinical Protocol: Urinary Incontinence dated 01/2024 provided by the facility revealed, As part of the initial assessment, continence status will be identified through interview of resident/resident representative and review of the resident's medical record . As appropriate, based on assessment of the category and causes of incontinence the associate will provide scheduled toileting, prompted voiding, or other interventions to try to improve the individual's continence status . 1. Review of the undated Profile Face Sheet in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one out of five residents (Resident (R)40) reviewed for unnecessary medications did not receive an unnecessary medication. R40 was prescribed an anti-anxiety medication on an as needed (PRN) basis without a stop date identified. Findings include: Review of the facility's Psychotropic Medication policy dated 10/2024 and provided by the facility revealed, Residents will not receive PRN doses of psychotropic medications unless that medication is necessary to treat a specific condition that is documented in the clinical record. The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medication beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. The specific duration for the PRN order will be indicated in the order. Review of the undated Profile Face Sheet in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to document the provision of activities of daily living (ADLs), the percentage of meals eaten, and the administration of scheduled treatments for 4 (R1, R2, R4, and R5) of 18 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. A review of a facility policy titled, Shower/Tub Bath, revised in February 2024, revealed, The purposes of this procedure are to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. The policy indicated, The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL record and /or in the resident's medical record: A. The date and time the shower/tub bath was performed. B. All assessment data (e.g., any reddened areas, sores, etc. [et cetera, other similar things], on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower/tub bath. C. How the resident tolerated the shower/tub bath. D. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason(s) why and the intervention taken. E. The signature and title of the person recording the data. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not report allegations to the State Agency within the required timeframes. This was discovered with 4 (R41, R9, R116, and R10) of 5 Facility Reportable Incidents. -R41 alleged physical abuse by staff and this was not reported to the State Agency within 2 hours as required. -R9 sustained rib fractures of unknown origin that were not reported at all to the State Agency as required. -R116 had an allegation of sexual misconduct of a staff that was not reported to the State Agency within the 24 hours and 5-day required timeframes. -R10 had an allegation of neglect with an injury that was not reported to the State Agency within 2 hours as required. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy and procedure Abuse Prevention revised 6/2022. The Abuse Prevention policy documents the following: Monitoring and Follow UP: Monitoring, documentation and applicable interventions will be completed by clinical associates; Prevention: Identification, ongoing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were thoroughly investigated, including preventative/corrective action. This was discovered with 4 (R41, R36, R9, and R116) of 4 Facility Reportable Incidents (FRI). -R41 had an allegation of physical abuse by staff that was not thoroughly investigated, including preventative action. -R36 had an allegation of verbal abuse investigated without preventive/corrective action. -R9 had an injury of unknown origin of rib fractures that was not thoroughly investigated, including preventative/corrective action. -R116 had an allegation of sexual misconduct by staff that was not thoroughly investigated. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy and procedure on Abuse Investigation and Reporting revised 10/23. The procedures include: interview resident, staff and anyone with potential information; reviewing medical record for events leading up to event; witness reports will be obtained in writing, signed and dated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 1 (R9) of 18 residents reviewed for quality of care, received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice. * On 8/10/23 at 9:00 pm, R9 slipped off her bed and fell to the floor. There was no Registered Nurse (RN) assessment completed after this fall prior to transferring R9 back into bed. R9 was not added to the facility's 24-hour board for monitoring of R9 after the fall. There were conflicting investigative statements, where Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-I reported Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-J transferred R9 back into bed alone while CNA-J indicated the nurse came and helped get R9 up. There was no call to R9's responsible party or MD. There is no documentation on 8/10/23 regarding this fall. On 8/14/23 R9 complained of pain, denying fall or injury. The physician assistant was updated and R9 was transported to the hospital, where R9 was diagnosed with multiple fractures of the left sided ribs. The 8/18/23, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and residents with pressure injuries received the necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure injuries from developing for 2 of 6 (R23 and R19 ) residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * R23 did not have a comprehensive assessment or measurements of her stage 4 sacral pressure injury upon admission and was missing consistent weekly assessments and measurements. * R19 was observed to not have heels offloaded when in bed. Findings include: The facility procedure titled, Pressure Injury Assessment/Treatment dated last approved August, 2023 documents (in part) .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for a consistent method of identification of and for the initial care of identified pressure injuries, alterations in skin integrity, and the prevention of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's to meet the needs of each resident. Expired medications were observed in 1 of 2 unit refrigerators which involved 1 discharged resident (R1A) and 1 of 3 medication carts observed which involved (R30). Findings include The facility policy titled Medication Disposal and Returns effective 6/21/17 documents (in part) . .3. Nursing staff shall dispose of any discontinued and expired medications that have been opened, or are not returnable to the pharmacy in accordance with policies and procedures. Policy: Facilities will dispose of discontinued and expired medications that are not returnable to the pharmacy in accordance with local State and Federal regulations and per facility protocols. The facility policy titled Medication Administration effective 6/21/17 documents (in part) . 5. Multi-dose vials: a. After initial use are to be labeled with date opened and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility did not ensure residents psychotropic medications were adequately monitored for indications for use. This was observed with 2 (R18 and R55) of 5 residents reviewed on psychotropic medications. * R18 was admitted on antianxiety and anti-depressant medications without behavioral indications for use and monitoring. * R55 was admitted on antipsychotics and antianxiety medication without behavioral indications for use and monitoring. This is evidenced by: Policy Review: Behavioral Assessments, Interventions and Monitoring last revised 12/2019 Procedure(includes) C. Residents with behavioral expressions and those on a psychotropic medication will have their behaviors monitored routinely. D. Specific, individualized, interventions will be put into place to aide in behavior management that includes non- pharmacological modalities. 1. The interdisciplinary Team will meet to review and discuss the following: a. specific resident behavior b. Appropriateness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-11-14 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staff information contained the resident census, failed to post it daily, and failed to maintain the nurse staffing data for a minimum of 18 months. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and visitors being uninformed about the facility's staffing status. Findings include: An observation on 11/14/24 at 8:36 AM, the nurse staffing information with the title Ascension Living posted on top of the receptionist desk at the entrance of the facility did not include the resident census number. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 1:36 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) verified the document did not include the resident census. During the interview, the nurse staff information documents were requested for the past 18 months. She provided the documents for 11/01/24 through 11/13/24. She stated they had not been posting them for a while because they hired a new Staffing Coordinator, and she did not start posting them until October 2024. During an interview on 11/14/24 at 10:00 AM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2023-10-05 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespreadDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility did not implement their abuse prevention policy by ensuring 3 of 8 facility staff had the necessary background information disclosure (BID) form completed upon hire in order to work at the facility. The BID form is 1 of a 3 part screening process which requires applicants/employees to disclose various information such as; if they have any criminal charges pending against them, if they have ever been convicted of a crime in federal, state, local, military, and tribal courts, if any government agency found the individual to have committed child abuse or neglect or if they have ever been found to have abused or neglected any person or client. This deficient practice had the potential for affect all 74 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Registered Nurse (RN)-H was hired on 4/18/19 and there is no evidence the background information disclosure (BID) was obtained. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-G was hired on 6/19/18 and there is no evidence the BID was obtained. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)-E was hired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$120,905 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $120,905 — penalty dated 2025-02-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-13 for 97 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-14 for 31 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASCENSION LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 3.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCENSION HEALTH SENIOR CARE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 07/01/2014 |
| MUSGRAVE, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SHADBOLT, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SMOOT, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SIDHU, SARFRAZ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2018 |
| ST LOUIS, STEVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/23/2025 |
| FAST PACE MEDICAL STAFFING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/07/2022 |
| FAVORITE HEALTHCARE STAFFING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/14/2022 |
| HEALTH DIMENSIONS CONSULTING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2025 |
| HOUSE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/10/2025 |
| MEDICAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/14/2017 |
| MEDICAL STAFFING SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/06/2020 |
| MICHAEL PORTER | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/09/2021 |
| NURSING CENTERS, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/08/2020 |
| PERSONNEL SPECIALISTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| PRN HEALTH SERVICES, INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/19/2022 |
| PROLINK HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/26/2023 |
| STAFF ONE, LTD. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/27/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525528. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.