Ascension Resurrection Life
7370 West Talcott Avenue, Chicago, IL 60631 · Non profit - Corporation · 162 certified beds · (773) 594-7400 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has 3 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 18.0% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.8% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 0.9% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 23.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 3.1% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.3% | 14.3% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 24.7% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.4% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.0% | 20.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.5% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.6% | 63.1% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.3% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.6% | 13.9% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.21 | 2.02 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.42 | 2.22 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 651 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 330 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.7%CMS range 53.5–62.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 8.8–12.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 47.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 37.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 5.6–9.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 162 beds and averages 117.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 45 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.99 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.98 to 1.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to follow the Care Plan implementing fall prevention interventions to one resident (R1) reviewed for resident injury. This failure resulted in R1 falling and sustaining bilateral subdural hemorrhages and a right parietal subarachnoid hemorrhage. R1 was admitted to the intensive care unit. Findings include: R1's hospital records, dated 2/14/2025, documents, in part, . presents to ED (emergency department) with chief complaint of Fall . Patient (R1) sustained hematoma to left orbit and skin tear to left elbow . CT (computed tomography) Cervical Spine WO (without) contrast, CT head WO Contrast, 2/14/2025 10:56 PM. Findings: Head: Small acute bilateral cerebral convexity subdural hematomas measuring 5 mm on the left and 3 mm on the right without significant mass effect. There is adjacent small right parietal subarachnoid hemorrhage measuring 7 mm. There is mild hyperdense thickening along the right tentorium…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record reviews the facility failed to make reasonable accommodations for two (R1, R2) of four residents. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining a facility acquired pressure ulcer to left heel. Findings include: 1.) R1's clinical record documents in part, R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the medical diagnosis of but not limited periprosthetic fracture, status post open reduction and internal fixation to right hip from fall at home, right hip pain, atrial fibrilla, heart disease, convulsions, and anxiety disorder. R1's minimum data set (MDS) Brief Interview Mental Status Score (13), indicates R1 is cognitively intact. R1's clinical notes documents in part: Nursing note 7/22/23 at 5:57 PM Received R1 from hospital, alert and oriented x3. R1 states, the beds is too small, and my room is dirty. R1 expressed concerns to V9 (R1's Former Facility Physician). Writer spoke with V9 regarding R1 concerns and is actively looking for another bed. Wound…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow their wound prevention policy for two residents (R1, R2). The facility failed to ensure one (R1) did not develop a pressure wound. The facility also failed to ensure R2 did not develop bilateral reddened heels despite being on a low air loss mattress. This failure resulted in R1 developing a deep tissue pressure injury to his left heel. Findings include: 1.) R1's clinical record documents in part, R1 is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the medical diagnosis of but not limited periprosthetic fracture, status post open reduction and internal fixation to right hip from fall at home, right hip pain, atrial fibrilla, heart disease, convulsions, and anxiety disorder. R1's minimum data set (MDS) Brief Interview Mental Status Score (13), indicates R1 is cognitively intact. R1's (7/22/23) clinical notes documents in part: 7/22/23 at 5:57 PM Nursing note: Received R1 from hospital, alert and oriented x3. R1 states,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-05-21 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain residents and staff documentation of screening, education, offering, and current COVID-19 vaccination status. These failures are not in accordance with their policies and procedures and CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) guidelines. Multiple residents and facility staff were positive of Covid infection that were either not up to date with COVID-19 immunization or unvaccinated that can potentially affect all 51 residents in the facility.Findings include: Per Outbreak log provided by V4 (Quality Director/Infection Nurse/Registered Nurse) there are twenty-eight (28) residents on the first outbreak started on 12/31/2025, that tested positive with COVID infections. Out of twenty-eight (28) residents there are eighteen (18) residents (R1, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R11, R12, R13, R14, R15, R16, R17, R18, R19, R20, R21, R22 and R26) positive of COVID infections that were either not up to date with COVID-19 vaccination or unvaccinated. First Outbreak resulted to four (4) residents hospitalized due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent a resident from developing wounds due to immobilizer/brace skin friction. Facility also failed to consistently document physician orders were being followed/given on the treatment administration record (TAR) and on the medication administration record (MAR) for 1 (R1) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: R1 was a resident in the facility re-admitted on [DATE] and was discharged on 03/07/2026. R1 is cognitively intact with BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15. R1 upon admission uses right leg immobilizer/brace due to right lower leg fracture. R1's Braden Scale assessment was not up to date. Latest Braden Scale assessment was done on 11/11/2025, before admission of R1 on 12/24/2025 when R1 does not have right leg immobilizer/brace. Braden Scale assessment is a tool that would help identify risk for pressure ulcers. R1 has the following physician orders:R1 must wear fracture…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to contain oxygen equipment (nebulizer mask) per facility's policy. This failure affected one residents (R6) reviewed for oxygen equipment, in total sample size of 11 residents.Findings include: R6's face sheet shows that R6 has diagnosis which include but is not limited to anemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia.On 02/09/26 at 11:07 am, R6 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room. R6's nebulizer mask was not in use and not contained. R6 explained that she had the flu and COVID 19 about a week ago and that staff will give her the nebulizer machine and mask daily when she feels short of breath. On 02/09/26 at 11:10 am, Surveyor brought this observation to V3 (Quality Director, Infection Preventionist). V3 stated that the nebulizer mask should be contained in a bag when not in use for infection control. V3 also explained that the nebulizer mask is contained in a bag when not in use to avoid contamination. V3 then explained that R6 was recently positive for COVID 19 and was last isolated with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to perform hand hygiene and don the required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing care for three residents who required Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). These failures affected three residents (R1, R10 and R11). Findings include: The facility's document titled Enhanced Barrier Precaution shows that R1, R10 and R11 require EBP at the facility. 1.) R1's face sheet without a listed date document in part that R1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of: Urinary tract infection, retention of urine, acute kidney failure, dementia, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia, heart failure, bacteremia, Escherichia coli, weakness. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents in part; section C (cognitive patterns) documents in part that R1 has a score of 3 which means that R1 has severe cognitive impairment. R1's care plan dated 01/12/2026 documents in part; R1 is at risk for acquiring or transmitting infection due to Foley…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that food is labeled with a date the food was opened and a date the food expires. These failures have the potential to affect 131 residents living in the facility.Findings include: On 01/14/2026 at 10:22 AM, during an annual and licensure certification, surveyor performed an inspection of the facility's dry food storage room, which was conducted with V5 (Dining Services Director). Surveyor found a bag of hot dog buns that were opened and not labeled with an open date and not labeled with an expiration date. Surveyor found a bag of hamburger buns that were opened and not labeled with an open date and not labeled with an expiration date. Surveyor found a bag of white bread that was opened and not labeled with an open date and not labeled with an expiration date. On 01/14/2026 at 10:23AM, V5 stated, The foods that are opened should be labeled with a date it was opened and a date that the food expires. Food and Supply Storage Policy (revised 01/2024) states in part: All food, non-food items and supplies…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident (R11) who was later identified with a serious mental disorder or related condition to the appropriate state-designated authority for a Level II PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation and determination for one out of 26 residents reviewed for PASARRs.Findings include: R11's Profile Face Sheet documents in part an original admit date of 10/10/2024. V30 (Admissions Director) submitted R11's Level I PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) dated 10/10/2024. The outcome documents in part no Level II required because R11 had no severe mental illness, intellectual disability, or related conditions. V30 elected no mental health diagnoses known or suspected and no mental health medications for R11. R11's current Profile Face Sheet, however, documents in part diagnoses including but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent severe without psych features; generalized anxiety disorder; post-traumatic stress disorder; and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of record, the facility has the following failures related to pharmaceutical services: the facility failed to follow their policy and store controlled substances in a safe and secure manner and ensure an accurate controlled drug form for R129. This was true for 2 out of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage. Facility also failed to administered medicine properly by leaving medication at the bedside. Failed to administer medications as ordered by physician. These failures apply to 8 residents (R24, R57, R61, R67, R93, R102, R129, R143) receiving pharmaceutical services in the facility that may affect their healthcare needs.Findings include: 1.) On 1/13/2026 at approximately 11:35 AM, a medication cart was outside of R52's room. R52's room door was closed. The nurse responsible for the medication cart was not present. The medication cart's lock was not engaged. Surveyor was able to open medication drawers including the drawer that contained the locked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow call light policy and procedure on accessibility of call light for 1 out of 1 resident (R102) for a total sample of 26 residents reviewed for environment. Findings include: R102 is a [AGE] year-old resident of the facility. R102 was admitted on [DATE] due to fracture of neck of femur and right hip pain. R102's cognition is intact based on brief interview of mental status done on 12/29/2025 with perfect score of 15. R102 needs substantial or maximal assistance for bed mobility transfer and does not ambulate. On 01/13/2025 at 12:01 PM, R102 was seen laying on her bed alert and able to express her needs well. R102 said that she came to the facility about 2 and a half weeks ago for hip replacement and was doing rehabilitation or therapy. R102 stated that she cannot leave her bed because of her surgery and needs facility staff to help her with her needs. R102 stated that it bothers her so much that it takes facility staff three (3)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of record, the facility failed to meet quality of care of professional standards related to pharmaceutical services for 2 (R57 and R61) out of 26 residents in the sample reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: 1.) R61 is a [AGE] year-old resident, with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. R61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R61 started with tablet medication for diabetes Metformin 500 MG 1 tablet twice a day from 12/17/2025 to 12/18/2025. On 12/18/2025, Metformin 500 MG was changed to Glimepiride 4 MG schedule to take 1 tablet once daily. Per Medication administration record Glimepiride 4 MG was not documented as administered on 12/27/2025, 12/28/2025 and 01/07/2026. R61's MAR (Medication Administration Record) does not document blood sugar results that it was checked per physician order on 12/23/2025, 12/26/2025, 121/27/2025, 12/28/2025, 01/02/2026, 01/06/2026 and 01/11/2026. R61's blood sugar result was increasing reaching more than 300 starting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of record, the facility failed to follow the facility's medication administration policies. The facility also failed to follow physician order instruction during medication administration of 1 out of 6 residents (R61). There were thirty-one (31) opportunities with 6 errors resulting in 19.35% error rate. Findings include: On 01/14/2026 at 09:36 AM with V25 (Registered Nurse) at the medication cart. V25 prepared the following medicines that were labeled for R61: Bumetanide 1 MG Oral Tablet administered orally.Pioglitazone 30 MG Oral Tablet administered orally.Ferrous Sulfate 325 MG Oral Tablet administered via mouth.Finasteride 5 MG Oral Tablet administered orally.Vitamin C 500 MG Tablet administered orally.Multivitamins tablet administered orally.Aspirin 81 MG Oral Tablet administered via mouth.Folic Acid 1 MG Oral Tablet administered via mouth.Metoprolol Succinate 25 MG Extended-Release Oral Tablet administered orally.Carbidopa 25 MG / Levodopa 100 MG Oral Tablet administered orally.Senna-S 8.6 MG - 50 MG administered orally.Glimepiride 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and store all drugs and biologicals in a safe and secure manner. This was true for 2 out of 4 medication carts and 1 out of 4 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 1/13/2026 at approximately 11:35 AM, a medication cart was outside of R52's room. R52's room door was closed. The nurse responsible for the medication cart was not present. The medication cart's lock was not engaged. Surveyor was able to open medication drawers. Surveyor also noted a set of keys with a blue spring keychain on top of the medication cart. On 1/13/26 at 11:39 AM, V7 (Nurse) exited out of R52's room. V7 stated [V7] was responsible for the mediation cart. V7 stated the medication cart contains medications for 22 residents. V7 stated [V7] was applying a cream to R52 and needs to administer Tylenol. V7 grabbed the keys that were on top of the medication cart and placed them inside scrub pocket. V7 donned personal protective equipment, went back inside R52's room, and closed the door. V7…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was properly disposed of before the staff member exited one (R42) resident on EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) room and failed to ensure PPE was donned when changing the linen for one (R69) resident on EBP. Findings Include: R42 has diagnosis not limited to Cellulitis of Right lower Limb, Lymphedema and Sepsis.R42's Physician's Orders document in part: Midline Insertion, Wound Care Right Knee and Wound Care Right Lower Leg. Enhanced Barrier Precautions, IV (Intravenous) therapy.R42's Care Plan document in part: Pressure Ulcers/Skin Prevention: R42 has right lower extremity cellulitis with open wounds to right lower extremity. Infection and IV's: R42 is on antibiotic therapy for cellulitis on bilateral lower extremities.On 01/13/26 at 11:35 AM V16 (Registered Nurse) exited R42's room with PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) on, doffed the PPE in the hallway, then put the PPE in a hamper located in the hallway. V16 stated R42 is on isolation for a wound. R42 is not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to clean and empty a resident's ileostomy bag in a timely manner. The facility also failed to ensure an accurate skin assessment upon admission. These failures affect one (R1) out of three residents reviewed for ostomy care. Findings include: R1's Face sheet documents that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 08/26/2025. On 09/13/2025 at 12:51PM, V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) states R1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE]. V4 states she was the nurse assigned to care for R1 on 08/26/2025. V4 states sometime after lunch around 12:30PM, V6 (R1's Family Member) asked the staff to change R1's colostomy bag because it was soiled and full. V4 states V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) had begun cleaning R1's body before V4 arrived to R1's room. V4 states then V5 alerted her that while V5 was cleaning on the right side of R1's body, there was a [NAME] of fluids from what appeared to be a surgical wound that was located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy of transferring a resident via a mechanical lift. This failure affected 1 (R1) resident reviewed for supervision in the total sample of 3 residents. Findings include: The 06/06/2025 List of Residents on Sit to stand and/or Mechanical Lift transfer include R1. On 06/06/2025, at 11:18 AM, inside R1's room, V12 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) and V13 (Registered Nurse) transferred R1 from the wheelchair to the toilet seat with the use of the sit to stand lift. After sitting R1 on the toilet seat, V13 washed her hands and informed V12 to call her when R1 is done using the toilet. On 06/06/2025, at 11:30 AM, V12 transferred R1 from the toilet seat to R1's wheelchair with the use of the sit to stand lift all by herself. On 06/06/2025, at 11:32 AM, V13 went inside R1's room. V13 asked V12 Why did you not call me? On 06/06/2025, at 11:33 AM, V12 stated we need two-person assist for transfer via the sit to stand lift. I did not wait for her (V13) to assist me because she (R1) is already getting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide person-centered discharge plan of care for 5 out 5 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5) reviewed for care plan. Finding includes: R1 is [AGE] years old, initially admitted in the facility on 02/27/2025. R1 medical diagnosis includes atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis on the right leg, spinal stenosis, radiculopathy lumbosacral region and malaise. R1's cognition based on her BIMS score of 15 dated 03/05/2025. On 04/01/2025 at 10:32 PM, V3 (Ombudsman) stated that R1 and her daughter (V6) had concern about being discharge prematurely. Care plan of R1 was reviewed in relation to discharge planning. Per R1's care plan R1 does not plan to make the community/facility a long-term home that was dated on 02/27/2025. Goal is for R1 to be assisted with plan of stay in the community/facility until discharge is practicable, through the next review period. Interventions includes associates/facility staff will support R1 plan to stay short term. And assist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) ensure all food items were labeled with an opened and use by date, b.) discard expired food based on use by date documented on label, c.) follow manufacturer guidelines for storage. These failures have the potential to affect all 132 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 10/01/24 at 9:12 AM, V11 (Dining Services Director/Certified Dietary Manager) stated all items are marked with a received by label which contain the date the item was delivered. V11 stated the kitchen uses a label machine to generate label stickers to put on all prepared or opened refrigerated items and opened non-refrigerated food items. The label stickers generated by the label machine has an area to write in the name of the product, the opened date (today's date) and the use by date or expiration date (Good Thru). V11 stated the use by or best by dates vary depending on what the product is. V11 stated the kitchen staff should be making sure all food items are labeled and that they are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to dispose eye drops after the discard date, refrigerate an unopened insulin pen, and lock a medication cart when not in use or in view for two out of four carts reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The facility also failed to properly dispose of R76's controlled medication after opening and failed to ensure controlled medications for R64 were under a double lock for 1 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage and labeling. Findings include: 1.) On 10/01/2024 at 2:14 PM, surveyor reviewed the medication cart designated for the intermediate and memory-impaired units with V6 (Registered Nurse). There was a bottle of Systane Gel Eye Drops for R44. The written open date was 8/28 and the written discard date was 9/28. V6 stated V6 did not notice the discard date that morning. V6 stated staff should have tossed the medication and V6 will reorder it. R44's Physician Orders document in part Systane Gel Eye Drops place one (1) drop into both eyes twice a day. 2.) In the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) follow their policies by not wearing the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during high-contact resident care activities for 4 (R8, R28, R54, R223) residents and b.) handle and contain soiled linen during linen changing and transport. These failures have the potential to affect all residents residing on the first floor and second floor units. Findings Include: 1.) R28 has diagnosis not limited to Acute Embolism and Thrombosis of Femoral Vein, Bilateral, Localized Edema, Polyneuropathy, Unsteadiness on feet, Mature T/NK-Cell Lymphoma, Muscle Spasm, Thrombocytopenia and Heart failure. R28's MDS (Minimum Data Set) BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score is 15 indicating intact cognitive response. Physician Order dated 09/06/24 document in part: Enhanced Barrier Precaution due to wound. Care Plan Document in part: Place (EBP) Enhance Barrier Precaution signage and PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) supplies at entrance to resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure call light was within reach for one (R32) out of eight residents reviewed in a total sample of 26 for call lights. Findings include: On 10/01/24 at 12:34 PM, R32 was lying in bed in room. R32's call light was lying on the floor, out of R32's reach. R32's call light had a clip on attached to the cord of the call light. R32 stated when R32 needs help from the staff R32 uses the call light to call for help. R32 stated R32 does not know where the call light is right now. R32 stated R32 cannot reach it. On 10/01/24 at 1:23 PM, observed R32 lying in bed in room. R32's call light lying on the floor, out of R32's reach. On 10/01/24 at 1:29 PM, V6 (Registered Nurse) stated the call light should be within reach of the resident. V6 observed R32's call light on the floor and quickly picked it up off the floor and stated the call light should not be on the floor. V6 stated the call light should be clipped on the bedding to prevent it from dropping on the floor, and from it being out of reach of the resident. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow their discharge against medical advice policy for 1 (R120) resident reviewed for discharge in a sample of 26. Findings Include: R120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis not limited to Epilepsy, Mild Intermittent Asthma, Unspecified Fall, Obesity, Syncope and Collapse and Unilateral Primary Osteoarthritis. Based on review of R120's progress note, R120 was admitted to the facility at 04:00 PM on 08/05/24 and left the facility AMA (Against Medical Advice) on 08/05/24 at 07:30 PM. Progress note dated 08/05/24 10:26 PM document in part: Resident admitted at 4 pm with dx (diagnosis) multiple falls at home with head injury. 7 staples intact to the back of the head. Syncope, epilepsy, seizure disorder, elevated troponin, obesity, asthma, right knee pain, osteoarthritis. Resident's medications reviewed with resident and resident's nephew. All prescriptions faxed to pharmacy; writer called pharmacy for medications to be delivered.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's initial preadmission screening was completed prior to admission to the nursing facility for 1 (R40) out of 2 sampled residents reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Findings Include: R40's clinical records show an initial admission date of 3/27/24 with included diagnoses not limited to Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. R40's Notice of PASRR Level I Screen Outcome shows a review date of 8/14/24. On 10/02/24 at 9:52 AM, interviewed V15 (Business Development Coordinator) and stated that R40's PASARR was done after admission because R40 came from home. At 11:29 AM, interviewed V1 (Administrator) and stated PASSAR screening is done prior to admission to make sure that residents being admitted are eligible and meet the requirements to come to the nursing facility. V1 stated if it was somebody coming from a community the facility is doing post screen and should be done right away. The facility's policy titled, PASARR (Pre admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a resident's (R64's) and their representative's wishes for no hospitalization for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed for hospice. Findings include: R64's Face Sheet documents in part a Code Status of NO CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). R64's Uniform Practitioner Order for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) Form documents in part wishes for Do Not Attempt Resuscitation/DNR, Comfort-Focused Treatment: Primary goal of maximizing comfort. Request transfer to hospital only if comfort needs cannot be met in current location. POLST signed/active since [DATE]. R64's [DATE] Physician Orders document in part: Patient has a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) Order signed [DATE] and Do Not Hospitalize with an order/start date of [DATE]. On [DATE] at 11:41 AM, V25 (R64's Family Member) stated facility transferred R64 to the hospital against their wishes. V25 stated facility transferred R64 around Sunday ([DATE]) at 6:15 AM. Facility didn't call the family until around…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to correctly set an air loss mattress based on weight for one (R32) of 8 residents reviewed in a total sample of 26 for pressure wound treatment services. Findings include: On 10/01/24 at 12:34 PM, R32 was lying in bed on air loss mattress. The air loss mattress was set at setting 4 indicating 250-pound weight per the display panel. On 10/01/24 at 1:24 PM, R32 was lying in bed on air loss mattress. Air loss mattress still set at 4 indicating 250-pound weight. V6 (Registered Nurse) observed the mattress setting at 4 on the display panel and stated R32 does not weight 250 pounds. V6 stated the Maintenance Department sets the rate of the air loss mattress when they deliver the mattress to the room. On 10/01/24 at 1:26 PM, V16 (Director of Facilities Management) came into R32's room and stated V16's department delivers the air loss mattress to the resident's room, but the nurse is the one who sets the rate of the air loss mattress. V16 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and records reviews, the facility failed to follow the fall care plan intervention for one resident (R98) of 8 residents reviewed for falls out of a total sample of 26. Findings Include: R98's diagnosis includes but not limited to Unspecified Dementia with Agitation, Repeated Falls, Anxiety Disorder. R98's clinical records show R98 has a history of multiple falls. R98's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows R98 had severe cognitive impairment and requires partial/moderate assistance with chair to bed to chair transfer. R98's fall care plan documents in part, resident is at risk for falls due to impaired mobility and weakness, moderate vascular dementia with mood disturbance and resident takes psychoactive medications. One of R98's fall care plan interventions initiated on 07/10/24 reads, floor mats in when resident is in bed and thick mats to extend sleeping area dated 09/07/24. R98's Fall Risk Assessment completed 09/22/24 documents in part that R98 has a grand score of 40 indicating…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure to ensure a.) oxygen equipment was dated and changed weekly, b.) physician orders for oxygen administration rate were followed, c.) nebulizer equipment was stored in a plastic bag with the resident's name and date on it when not in use. These failures have the potential to affect two (R9, R273) of eight residents reviewed for respiratory care in a total sample of 26. Findings include: 1.) On 10/01/24 at 12:20 PM, observed R9 lying in bed with oxygen infusing via nasal canula and oxygen concentrator set between 3-4 liters per minute. The humidifier bottle was not dated. The oxygen tubing had a bright orange label which documented, Change Sunday 09/22/24 at 6AM On 10/01/24 at 12:26 PM, V6 (Registered Nurse/RN) looked up R9's oxygen order in R9's paper medical record and stated R9's physician order is for R9 to receive 2 liters per minute continuously via nasal canula. V6 stated the oxygen infusion rate is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident (R221) was free of any significant medication errors for one out of five residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: R221's Face Sheet and Physician Orders document in part a medical diagnosis of Essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). R221's Care Plan documents in part a Potential for alteration in blood pressure related to diagnosis of hypertension (Problem onset: 09/26/2024). Approaches include Medications as ordered and monitor for side effects. On 10/01/2024 at 8:54 AM, V28 (Agency Registered Nurse) prepared R221's morning medications. Surveyor observed V28 prepare Apixaban (Eliquis), Furosemide, and Carvedilol for R221. At 9:12 AM, R221 took the oral pills. At 9:14 AM, V28 stated [V28] completed R221's medication pass and continued to R87's room. Surveyor reviewed R221's October 2024 eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record). It documents in part a 9:00 AM dose for Losartan Potassium 25 MG (milligram) one tablet by mouth. V28 did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve mechanical soft food to a resident on mechanical soft diet order. This failure affected 1 (R19) of 4 residents reviewed for mechanical soft diet prepared in the facility's kitchen, in a total sample of 26 residents. Findings Include: On 10/01/24 at 11:26 AM, observed R19 eating in the unit dining room. R19 had a large plate of salad with raw Romaine lettuce, tomato wedges, chopped hardboiled egg, bacon pieces and chunks of chicken. Observed R19 putting a piece of lettuce and bacon in R19's mouth and then using R19's fingers to take the lettuce and bacon back out of R19's mouth and placing the semi chewed lettuce and bacon on the side of R19's plate. Observed R19's meal ticket which read Mechanical Soft, CCD (Controlled Carbohydrate Diet) and pink piece of paper titled, Food Substitution Request for lunch checked Alternative Menu and the words mech handwritten on the bottom of the form. On 10/01/24 at 11:32 AM, V10 (Activity Aide) observed the large salad plate in front of R19 and stated R19 usually gets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to follow their Discarding and Destroying Medications policy, and failed to assure that medications to be disposed were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents. These failures have the potential to affect 80 residents living on the first floor that may be able to access the unsecured room. Findings include: On 12/16/2023 at 10:37am, tour of the soiled utility room on the East side of the facility next to the loading dock with V10(Registered Nurse-RN/Quality Director/Infection Preventionist), the door to the soiled utility room was not locked and observed in the room were six 13 gallon clear plastic bags, with five of the plastic bags knotted at the top, and one of the bags was open and medications were observed spilling to the floor, with pills, opened/no wrapper on the floor. Two pills were round, pink in color, one red round pill, one yellow oval pill. V10 said there were around 80 residents on the first floor. V10 said the medications in the room were not properly secured, and if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to follow infection control policy by failing to properly dispose of used needles, contaminated blood draw equipment, failed to secure the contaminated equipment by over filling the sharps containers and leaving needles and contaminated tubing exposed, failed to properly close sharps containers by leaving them without top covers while filled with sharps. This deficiency has the potential to affect all 80 residents living on the first floor. Findings include: On 12/16/2023 at 10:37am, tour of the soiled utility room on the East side of the facility next to the loading dock surveyor with V10(Registered Nurse-RN/Quality Director/Infection Preventionist), the door to the soiled utility room was not locked surveyor with V10 observed were four large cartons filled with red sharps containers. Some of the sharps' containers were observed with a black cover/cap, while others were observed to have no covers and were overflowing, with some having needles outside of the sharps' containers. V10 said sharps containers should…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident remain free from abuse, for one of three (R1) residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R1 being physically abused by a Certified Nursing Assistant. This past noncompliance occurred from 11/9/2023 to 11/11/2023. Findings include: R1's current face sheet documents R1 is an [AGE] year-old individual with diagnosis that include but not limited to: Unspecified injury of the head, chronic obstructive sleep apnea, asthma, depression, encephalopathy. R1's BIMS (Minimum Data Set) section C, dated 11/25/2023 documents R1's BIMS as 3/15, indicating R1 has severe cognitive function. MDS section GG dated 10/01/2023 documents R1 needs substantial/maximal assistance with ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care. Facility Reported Incident (FRI) report dated 11/09/2023 documents: On November 8 at around 11:30 pm, V7(Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) notified that when he was taking care of resident across the hallway, he heard a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA possessed the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services in a safe manner for one (R1) resident of three reviewed. This failure resulted in a CNA physically abusing (hitting) R1. This past noncompliance occurred from 11/9/2023 to 11/11/2023. Findings include: On 12/16/2023 at 3:17pm, V1(Administrator) said R1 was a resident of the facility, and V7 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) witnessed V8 (CNA) slapping R1's hands. V1 said hitting a resident is physical abuse, and V8 was removed from the building after she was witnessed hitting R1. V1 said she was aware this was a noncompliance because the policy is for residents to remain free of abuse. V1 said staff were educated regarding resident abuse. V1 said the policy is before a staff starts working at the facility, the staff should have had abuse prevention training, and V1 said V8 fell through the cracks and there is no training on abuse for V8 before V8 started taking care of residents at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide group activities to meet the needs and interests of 1 resident (R1) out of 3 reviewed for resident rights. This failure resulted in R1 having limited interaction with peers and resident feeling isolated. Findings include: R1 has a diagnosis of but not limited to Hemiplegia Following Cerebral Infarction, Depression, Spinal Stenosis, Hypertension, Peripheral Vascular Disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) section B dated 12/26/22 documents R1's vision is severely impaired. R1's Brief Mental Status Interview (BIMS) dated 01/30/23 documents score of 15/15 indicating intact cognition. R1's has a care plan for being legally blind and activities care plan dated 12/21/23 which documents in part R1 will participate in activity of her choice and interact with peers. On 10/04/23 at 11:22 AM, R1 stated after she attends mass in the morning at 9:30 AM and that from 10:30 AM onward she is in the room for the rest of the day, especially on the weekends, Mondays, and Tuesdays. R1 stated she attends mass which is a group…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard outdated medications for 2 (R9 and R16) residents. The facility failed to properly store medications requiring refrigeration for 2 (R3 and R7) residents. The facility also failed to ensure that medication cart was locked when not in use. These failures can potentially affect 23 residents assigned to V6 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse) reviewed for medication storage and labeling in 2 of 4 medication storage rooms and 3 of 6 medication carts. The findings include: On 9/5/23 at 9:01 am V2 (Director of Nursing) stated that facility has 4 medication storage rooms (2 on each floor - 1st and 2nd floor) and 6 medication carts (3 on each floor - 1st and 2nd floor). On 9/5/23 at 2:03 pm 1st floor medication cart observed parked by the nurse's station, medication cart observed open, not locked, and unattended. Medication cart inspected with V6 (Agency Licensed Practical Nurse), stated the room assignment has a total of 23 residents for this cart. Observed the following medications inside the medication cart:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) was properly worn by staff when entering a resident's room on Transmission-Based Precautions with COVID-19 (Coronavirus). This failure has the potential to affect 18 residents residing on the 1B unit. The facility also failed to clean or disinfect reusable equipment, vital sign monitor with stand and was used in between resident during medication administration. This failure can potentially affect 13 residents assigned to V10 (Agency Registered Nurse). Findings Include: 1.) R2 has a diagnosis not limited to Pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Venous Insufficiency, Cough, Heart Failure, Essential (Primary) Hypertension and COVID-19. R2's Physician Orders document in part: Maintain Special Droplet Precautions Per Protocol. R2's Care Plan document in part: R2 has tested positive for COVID-19 infection. Provide PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) per protocol. Special Droplet Precautions per protocol. R2 requires isolation due to an infection. Signage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the call light was within reach for R14 and failed to respond to R34's needs for two out of a total sample of 25 residents reviewed for call lights. Findings include: 1.) On 9/05/2023 at 12:05 PM, R34 stated staff are busy and have no time to answer the call lights at times. R34 stated They should at least come and check on me. At 12:13 PM, R34 pressed the call light button. R34 stated feeling short of breath and wanted the nebulizer mask. R34 stated R34 will wait two to three hours during some nights before someone responds to it. At 12:28 PM, V23 (Certified Nurse Assistant) entered R34's room to drop off the lunch tray. V23 turned off the call light and left the room without asking what R34 needed. At 12:29 PM, R34 stated Staff just come in, do what they need to do and just leave. Now I have to eat lunch and just wait to see how I feel I guess. At 12:40 PM, R34 turned on the call light. V23 passed by R34's room and did not answer it. At 12:44 PM, R34 stated wanting a nebulizer treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents' code statuses were consistent with their Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms for three (R34, R46, R91) out of a total sample of 25 residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Findings include: 1.) R34's POLST documents in part NO CPR [Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation]: Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR). R34's comprehensive care plan contains a problem onset with a date of [DATE]. It documents in part: Resident will have advance directives reviewed upon admission. [R34] is full code status [attempt resuscitation]. 2.) R46's POLST documents in part NO CPR [Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation]: Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR). R46's comprehensive care plan contains a problem onset with a date of [DATE]. It documents in part: Resident will have advance directives reviewed upon admission. [R46] is full code status. 3.) R91's POLST documents in part NO CPR [Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation]: Do Not Attempt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 (R72) resident reviewed for wound preventive measures in a sample of 25. Findings Include: R72 has diagnosis not limited to Progressive Supranuclear Ophthalmoplegia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Weakness, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Contracture, Right Hand, Contracture, Left Hand, Muscle Weakness (Generalized) and Lack of coordination. Physician Orders: document in part: pressure relieving mattress to bed and cushion to wheelchair. Care Plan document in part: R72 is at risk for impaired skin integrity due to reduced mobility and incontinence. Impaired mobility due to weakness secondary to progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia. Braden Risk Assessment Report dated 07/18/23 document in part: Risk score 15, Risk Level Mild. Mobility: Very limited. Moisture: Occasionally Moist. Activity: Chair Fast - Ability to walk severely limited or non-existent. On 09/05/23 at 10:21 AM R72 was observed sitting in the wheelchair at the bedside with no footrest in place. A folded towel was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician order for wound preventive measures were followed for 1 (R72) resident review for wound prevention in a sample of 25. Findings Include: R72 has diagnosis not limited to Progressive Supranuclear Ophthalmoplegia, Vitamin D Deficiency, Weakness, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Contracture, Right Hand, Contracture, Left Hand, Muscle Weakness (Generalized) and Lack of coordination. Physician Orders: document in part: pressure relieving mattress to bed and cushion to wheelchair. Care Plan document in part: R72 is at risk for impaired skin integrity due to reduced mobility and incontinence. Impaired mobility due to weakness secondary to progressive supranuclear ophthalmoplegia. Braden Risk Assessment Report dated 07/18/23 document in part: Risk score 15, Risk Level Mild. Mobility: Very limited. Moisture Occasionally Moist. Activity: Chair Fast - Ability to walk severely limited or non-existent. On 09/05/23 at 10:21 AM R72 was observed sitting in the wheelchair at the bedside with no footrest…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident received the correct oxygen flow rate as ordered by the physician and to properly label oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle for 2 (R12, R94) out of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen use in a sample of 25. Findings Include: 1.) On 9/5/23 at 10:44 AM, R12 was lying in bed alert and awake. R12 was receiving supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters per minutes (LPM). R12's oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle had no labels with the dates when they were last changed. On 9/5/23 at 10:57 AM, V8 (Registered Nurse) stated that oxygen tubing is changed on 11-7 shift every Sunday and the humidifier is changed when it's consumed. V8 stated that when the tubing is changed, there should be a tape around the tubing with the date written the day it was changed, and it should be changed weekly to prevent infection for the residents. R12's clinical records show R12 has diagnoses not limited to Heart Failure and Dementia. R12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate was less than 5% for 2 (R67 and R229) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration. There were 30 opportunities and 5 errors resulting in a 16.67% medication error rate. The findings include: 1.) R67's health record documented admit date of 2/21/23 with diagnoses not limited to Peripheral vascular disease, Atherosclerotic native arteries of right leg with ulceration of thigh and left leg with ulceration of calf, Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, Peripheral vascular angioplasty status with implants, Anemia, Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease, Chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure. On 9/5/23 at 10:26 am Medication administration conducted with V10 (Agency Registered Nurse). R67 observed lying in bed, head of bed elevated, alert and verbally responsive. Observed V10 prepared the following medications: 1. Apixaban 5mg 1 tablet 2. Ascorbic acid 1000mg 1 tablet 3. Aspirin chewable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that resident is free of any significant medication errors. This failure applies to 1 (R67) of 6 residents reviewed for medication administration in a sample of 25. The findings include: R67's health record documented admit date of 2/21/23 with diagnoses not limited to Peripheral vascular disease, Atherosclerotic native arteries of right leg with ulceration of thigh and left leg with ulceration of calf, Encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system, Peripheral vascular angioplasty status with implants, Anemia, Acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease, Chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure. On 9/5/23 at 10:26 am Medication administration conducted with V10 (Agency Registered Nurse) Observed R67 lying in bed, head of bed elevated, alert and verbally responsive, with oxygen via nasal cannula at 2L/min. Observed V10 checked temperature = 97.2F; Blood pressure = 120/48; Pulse rate = 70/min. Observed V10 prepared the following medications: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2025-08-18 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of residents who were transferred or discharged back to the community or to another nursing facility. This failure has the potential to affect residents transferring or discharging out of 124 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:On 8/17/25 at 9:28 AM, V4 (Social Worker) stated that he emails V13 (Facility Ombudsman) once a week of the list of residents who are hospitalized . V4 stated he does not send notification of the other discharges such as residents who are discharged back to the community because it is not required. Email receipts provided by V4 reviewed and revealed V4 sent the list of hospitalized residents not including other transfers or discharges to V13 on these dates: 8/10/25, 8/1/25, 7/9/25, and 3/27/25.The facility's residents' roster shows 124 residents currently residing in the facility. The facility's Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for policy and procedure dated 1/25 documents in part: The social worker, or designee, is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-04-11 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to ASCENSION LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.8 | +0.2 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 4 of 5 | 3.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 3.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
The other 11 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASCENSION HEALTH SENIOR CARE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 07/01/2014 |
| SHADBOLT, ERIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SMOOT, KENNETH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MUSGRAVE, LISA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| CURTIS, RICHARD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/23/2025 |
| NABOLOTNY, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/01/2019 |
| HEALTH DIMENSIONS CONSULTING INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/13/2024 |
| MEDICAL SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/14/2017 |
| SMS PLUS, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/14/2025 |
| SOCIAL WORK CONSULTATION GROUP, INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/30/2022 |
| STAR-MEDICS-GROUP MEDICAL STAFFING AGENCY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/12/2024 |
| TOTAL NURSES NETWORK MILWAUKEE INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/19/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145960. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.