Via Christi Village Ridge

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 409 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 211 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 82% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 72.5 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.47 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.17 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.37 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.81 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with one resident reviewed for pain and activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 55 remained free from neglect when the facility failed to provide necessary care and services staff were aware R55 needed and had multiple failures, which resulted in delayed healing, physical discomfort, and decreased quality of life. Findings included:- R55's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), contact dermatitis (skin rash), and overactive bladder. R55's 01/07/26 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. R55's MDS documented no behaviors and minimal depression. R55 required total assistance with toileting hygiene, transfers, and bed mobility. R55 was always…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 56 residents with three residents reviewed for falls. Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to immediately implement interventions to prevent further falls for Resident (R) 1 after R1 had to be lowered to the floor when her left leg buckled underneath her. This failure led to another staff-assisted fall later the same day. As a result of this deficient practice, R1 sustained a severe fracture of the left ankle. This deficient practice also placed R1 at risk for pain, impaired mobility, and decreased independence. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and hypertension (high blood pressure). R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interviews, observation and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) and failed to follow appropriate infection control practices related to hand hygiene, sanitization of shared equipment, and sanitary storage of respiratory equipment. Findings included:1. On 02/09/26 at 11:05 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) N and CNA O assisted R55 to bed using the mechanical lift. R55 had a colostomy (a surgical creation of an artificial opening on the stomach wall to excrete feces from the body). CNA N and CNA O did not apply a gown during this care. CNA N used her gloved hands to open R55's drawer to retrieve the hygiene wipes. She wiped the red areas of R55's inner thighs several times using that same wipe. Staff assisted R55 to her side, and CNA N washed the resident's buttocks. Wearing the same gloves, she sprayed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents with five reviewed for discharge and two for hospitalization. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold policy at the time of transfer for Resident (R)75 and R3. Findings included: 1. R75's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], which documented, per staff interview, that the resident had short-term and long-term memory problems. The resident admitted on [DATE]. R75's Nursing Progress Notes, dated 01/05/26 at 05:37 PM, documented the nurse called emergency services based on a physician order to send the resident to the hospital. The resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] at 05:15 PM. The Transfer Form, dated 01/05/26 at 04:03 PM, documented the facility would provide the resident and/or representative with a bed hold that included the daily room rate and duration of the bed hold prior to transfer. However, the documentation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide services to meet professional standards of care when staff failed to ensure Resident (R) 7's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) contained appropriate documentation for the schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by gross distortion of reality, disturbances of language and communication, and fragmentation of thought) diagnosis. Findings included:- R7 's EMR revealed diagnoses of schizophrenia, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R7's Annual [NAME] Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. R7's MDS revealed a diagnosis of schizophrenia. R7's Cognitive Loss/Dementia Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 09/30/25, documented R7 was at the facility for long term care. R7 had dementia and required staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents with two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff provided ADL assistance with personal hygiene for Resident (R) 55 and R63, who did not receive fingernail care and facial hair removal, and R8 who did not receive staff assistance to get dressed. Findings included:1. R55's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses of anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), contact dermatitis (skin rash), and overactive bladder. R55's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14, which indicated intact cognition. R55's MDS documented that she had no rejection of care during the observation period and minimal depression. R55's MDS documented that she required total assistance with personal hygiene. R55's Care Plan,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0685 — isolated
  Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents with one reviewed for hearing aid use. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 8 received the necessary services, including staff assistance, with his hearing devices. Findings included: - R8's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), acoustic neuroma (typically slow-growing tumor that develops on the main nerve connecting the inner ear to the brain) with hearing loss, and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). R8's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The MDS documented R8 required moderate assistance with personal hygiene. The MDS noted R8 had minimal difficulty with hearing and R8 used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 69 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 31 remained free from significant medications errors when staff held metoprolol without a physician's order and did not contact the physician regarding the held medication. Findings included: - R31's Electronic Medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnosis: hypertension (elevated blood pressure). R31's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The medication section did not indicate hypertension. R31's Quarterly MDS, dated 02/02/26, indicated no changes to R31's BIMS or medications. R31's Care Plan, dated 11/06/25, noted R31 had hypertension and documented it would remain stable. Staff were to monitor R31's blood pressure and monitor and report side effects of medication. The plan directed staff to inform the physician of any…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Three residents were reviewed for privacy and confidentiality in their care at the facility. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the privacy of Resident (R) 1 when Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M took a video of R1 without R1's consent.Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R1 had a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). R1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status BIMS score of 99, indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS noted R1 required the assistance of one staff member with activities of daily living (ADLs).R1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS score of 99, indicating severely impaired cognition. R1 required assistance from one staff member with all ADL. R1's Care Plan, revised 05/27/25, indicated R1 required extensive assistance from one staff member for bed mobility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 72 residents. The facility identified four medication storage rooms and six medication carts used to administer medication to the residents. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication administration error rate was no greater than five percent (%) when errors occurred with 22 of 27 observed medications had errors when the Licensed Nurse (LN) failed to confirm the medications administered against the physician's order or the eMAR (electronic medication administration record). The medication errors were due to failure follow nursing standard of care which resulted in an error rate of 81.48%. Findings include: - On 04/04/24 at 07:30 AM, LN D administered two medications to Resident (R) 8 by removing them from an outer wrapper (which was labeled with the identification of the contents) and removed the medications from their internal wrapping (which were also individually labeled with the identification of the contents) and failed to confirm the medications against the physician's order or the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility census totaled 72 residents residing on four neighborhoods. Based on observation, interview, and record review. the facility failed to secure medications by the failure to lock two medication carts on two separate neighborhoods during administration of medications when nursing staff left the medication cart unlocked and unattended. This had the potential to affect 20 residents residing on neighborhood D2 and 20 residents on B2. Findings included: - On 04/03/24 at 11:35 AM, the medication cart on D2 neighborhood was unlocked with no nurse in the vicinity of the cart. On 04/03/24 at 11:35 AM, Licensed Nurse (LN) D reported there were 20 residents on the neighborhood who received medications from the medication cart. LN D stated the cart contained narcotics and insulins as well as other medications. LN D reported that all medication carts should be locked when unattended and confirmed that the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. On 04/04/24 at 09:12 AM, on B2 neighborhood, a medication cart was noted unlocked and unattended while LN C administered medications to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 72 residents with 18 residents sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program with the failure of staff to follow infection control standards when delivering meal trays to residents in the dining area, appropriately clean respiratory equipment for Resident (R) 8, R45 and R223 or perform hand hygiene between phases of wound care for R28. This deficient practice has the potential to lead foodborne illness, respiratory illness and wound infections. Findings include: - On 04/03/24 at 12:15 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) G and CNA H observed carrying multiple plates from satellite kitchen area in the D-200 neighborhood to resident tables with their thumbs over the edge of the plate and deep into the eating surface of the plates. On 04/03/24 at 12:25 PM, CNA G and CNA H revealed staff should carry resident plates by the bottom of the plate, without their fingers on the eating surface of the plates. On 04/03/24 at 12:36 PM, Dietary Staff I revealed that all staff,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$36,040 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $36,040 — penalty dated 2026-02-11
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-03-12 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to ASCENSION LIVING — 12 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS