Regents Park At Aventura

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 196 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 145 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 173.8 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 15 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2024-09-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to protect Resident #1's right to be free from Neglect by the facility's staff. Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), (Staff A) and (Staff B) failed to safely transfer Resident #1 from her bed to the chair with a Mechanical Lift. The facility neglected to effectively inspect and operate the Mechanical Lift in a safe manner during the transfer of Resident #1. This failure to operate the mechanical lift in a safe manner on [DATE] at 9:57 AM Staff A and Staff B who reported that during the transfer the Mechanical lift kept rising and when Staff B grabbed the lift pad to stop it from going higher Resident #1 suddenly fell from the Mechanical lift and landed face down on the floor sustaining injuries to her head. Resident #1 expired at the hospital approximately four hours later. There were 60 residents residing in the facility that required use of a mechanical lift for transfer. Refer to F 689, F 867, and F 908. The findings included: Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility's Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), (Staff A) and (Staff B) failed to ensure Resident #1 was safely transferred from the bed to the chair with a mechanical lift. The facility failed to effectively inspect, complete accurate safety check and maintain the mechanical lift to ensure it is safely operating during the transfer of Resident #1. This failure to ensure the mechanical lift is operating in a safe manner resulted in Resident # 1 falling from the mechanical lift on [DATE] at 9:57 AM while Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) Staff A and Staff B were transferring Resident #1 from bed to chair, Staff A and Staff B reported that during the transfer the mechanical lift kept rising and when Staff B grabbed the lift pad to stop it from going higher, Resident #1 suddenly fell from the lift and landed face down on the floor sustaining injuries to the head. Resident # 1 expired at the hospital approximately four (4) hours after the fall. There were 60…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the staff failed to keep residents' information confidential at one of the two nursing stations on the second floor. As evidenced by an unattended computer with an open screen displayed a resident's confidential health care information at the 2 [NAME] Nursing station. There were 173 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include.Observations on 01/06/2026 at 12:56 PM revealed an unattended computer with the screen open displaying residents' health care information at the 2 west Nursing Station. (Photographic evidence). Interview on 01/07/2026 at 09:30 AM, Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), stated, I understood HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) as it is related to protecting the privacy of patient information. Patient confidentiality mean not discussing resident information over the phone and only sharing information with individuals who were authorized and listed in the chart. When walking away from a computer, I made sure it was not left open or visible to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-05 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate privacy during hygiene and catheter care for one resident (Resident #7) out of three residents sampled with an indwelling urinary catheter. Resident #7's roommate entered the room while Resident #7 was exposed. At the time of the survey, nine residents with an indwelling urinary catheter resided in the facility. The findings include. During an observation on November 5, 2025, at 9:45 AM, Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), performed hygiene care for Resident #7. The privacy curtain did not completely extend around the bed, leaving Resident #7 exposed. Additionally, the roommate entered the room while care was ongoing.In an interview conducted on November 5, 2025, at 12:33 PM, Staff A, LPN, was asked about the facility's protocol related to providing privacy during personal care. Staff A acknowledged, I was aware that the curtain did not extend around the resident, but I did not want to stop because I did not want the resident to refuse care.During an interview on November 5, 2025, at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews facility failed to provide appropriate catheter care to facilitate the flow of urine for one (Resident#7) out of three sampled residents who had indwelling urinary catheter, as evidenced by during catheter care Resident#7's indwelling urinary catheter drainage collection bag and tubing were positioned on top of bed with backflowing urine noted in the tubing. This deficient practice prevented the free flowing of urine that would be accumulated in the bladder causing discomfort and increasing the risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infections and other serious medical issues. There were nine residents with indwelling urinary catheters residing in the facility at the time of this survey.The findings include. During an observation on 11/05/25 at 9:45 AM, Staff A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), performed hygiene and catheter care for Resident #7. The urinary drainage bag and tubing noted with urine were positioned on the bed next to the resident's feet in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F689-Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. As evidenced by: F689 was cited during a complaint survey ending 12/14/23 when the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and additional interventions to ensure the safety of vulnerable residents and to prevent repeated falls that resulted in injuries and during the recertification survey with exit dated 08/21/24 razors were observed on Resident #382 's nightstand The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification conducted on July 29, 2024, through August 1, 2024, at the facility, F689-Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices was cited as the facility failed to ensure resident's room was free of accident hazards (razors at bedside) for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident #382). Review of the facility policy and procedures titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to store prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety that potentially effects 164 of the facility residents. The findings included: 1) During the initial kitchen/food service observation tour conducted on 07/29/24 at 9:00 AM and accompanied with the facility's Food Service Director (FSD), the following were noted: (a) A large section of the ceiling (8 feet) was noted to be dripping heavily on to the floor area in front of food production table/surfaces and reach-in refrigerators (3). The floor covered in a large area of contaminated water. It was noted that staff were walking through the water and cases of recent food deliveries were also in contact with the water. The FSD stated that the dripping ceiling water was from broken air-conditioning pipes and had been an issue for the past 2 weeks. The surveyor requested that the cases of food be moved to a safe area…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a safe, orderly, and comfortable interior on the facility's first floor, second floor residential units, third floor residential units, maintenance department, and laundry area. The findings included: During the initial resident screenings conducted by the surveyors on 07/29/24 to 7/30/24 and environment rounds conducted on 07/31/24 and 08/01/24 accompanied with the facility's Director Of Housekeeping and Corporate Director of Housekeeping, the following were noted: 1) First Floor: Hallway - Ceiling mounted air -conditioning vents (4) noted to be covered with condensation and dripping onto hallway floor near skilled therapy department. Maintenance Department - During the 08/01/24 tour it was noted that the entry door to the room was proper fully open and no staff within the room and area. Noted that residents have access to hallway where the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that portion sizes documented on the approved menu were not followed and potentially effected 88 of the facility residents with physician ordered Regular diet. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal in the main kitchen on 07//31/24 at 11:45 AM, it was noted that the entree serving of roast turkey appeared insufficient. Further observation noted that all of the individual portions of Roast Turkey (approximately 40) located in steam table appeared insufficient. A review of the facility's approved menu for the lunch meal of 07/31/24 noted documentation that a minimum 3-ounce portion of Roast Turkey was to be served. A portion of the Roast Turkey that was plated to be served was selected by the surveyor to be weighed by the Food Service Director (FSD). The turkey portion weighed on the facility's calibrated food scale was recorded at 2.46 ounces. The surveyor reviewed the approved lunch menu with the FSD that indicated a requirement of 3 ounces minimum turkey portion. It was then requested…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to treat residents in a dignified manner who wear adult briefs for 2 out of 40 sampled residents (Residents #72 and Resident #136 and failed to ensure that residents are treated in a dignified manner with bedding while in bed for 1 out of 40 sampled residents (Resident #154) and failed to treat residents in a dignified manner during dining observation (Resident #6). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity During Mealtimes dated 03/2020 included in part the following: 8. Ensure the resident receives the proper tray. 11. Allow adequate time that resident requires to complete meal. Do not rush. 12. Allow resident time needed to complete as much as desired of the meal. Review of the facility's policy titled, Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity with a revised date of 04/2023 included in part the following: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-01 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide necessary care and services so that activities of daily living do not diminish for 1 (Resident #64) of 5 sampled resident for nutrition review for independence in self-feeding and 1 (Resident #177) of 1 sampled resident for daily dental care. The findings included: 1) Observation of the breakfast meal on 07/31/24 at 7:45 AM noted breakfast tray delivered to the room of Resident #64. Mechanical Soft tray served and set up on overbed table in front of resident. Resident not positioned and noted to be in almost a lying position in front of the meal tray. Resident noted to be attempting to feed self with hands and spilling foods on chest/gown. Resident unable to reach beverages on tray and could not drink liquids (juices, milk, coffee) provided on the meal tray. Resident noted with no supervision or assistance from staff during the entire meal observation and consumed less than 50% of the meal and 0% of fluids.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident's room free of accident hazards (razors at bedside) for 1 of 40 sampled residents (Resident #382). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy/procedure titled, Safety Awareness (Sharp Objects) dated 03/01/21 included in part: To ensure the safety and well-being of residents, staff, and visitors by regulating the possession and use of sharp objects and razors within the nursing home facility. For the safety of all individuals within the nursing home, the possession and use of sharp objects and razors by residents are strictly regulated. Sharp objects and razors pose a significant risk of injury and must be managed according to the guidelines outlined below: Definitions: Razors: Bladed instruments used for shaving or cutting hair. Guidelines: 1. Prohibited items: Residents are not permitted to possess or use sharp objects or razors independently within the nursing home. Sharp objects and razors include, but are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$64,981 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $64,981 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-10-30 for 5 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENTURA SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL