Claridge House Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 31 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 108 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 223.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.10 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure residents' safety for one out of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). As evidenced by, on 03/30/2025 Resident #1 left the facility undetected at approximately 12:45 PM, boarded a city bus and was found 8 hours later by law enforcement. The resident was located 5.2 miles away from the facility. The areas where the facility and where the resident was located are in high traffic areas and there were cross streets which could lead to the increased risk of the resident being hit by an automobile, falling, or being assaulted and/or being robbed based on his vulnerability and cognitive impairment. According to website, Accuweather.com on 03/30/2025 the temperature ranged between 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 86 degrees (F) with scattered showers. It was determined that this deficient practice posed an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-04-10 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility's administration failed to ensure effective systems were in place to provide adequate supervision for one out of three sampled residents (Resident #1). As evidenced by, on 03/30/2025 Resident #1 left the facility undetected at approximately 12:45 PM, boarded a city bus and was found 8 hours later by law enforcement. The resident was located 5.2 miles away from the facility. The facility and the area that the resident was located are both in high traffic areas with cross streets which could lead to the increased risk of the resident being hit by an automobile, falling, or being assaulted and/or being robbed based on his vulnerability and cognitive impairment. According to website, Accuweather.com on 03/30/2025 the temperature ranged between 72 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 86 degrees (F) with scattered showers. It was determined that this deficient practice posed an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure 1) proper temperatures of the foods stored in the 2 South Unit Floor Pantry Refrigerator and 1 North Unit Floor Pantry Refrigerator on the resident's units and 2) ensure kitchen staff were wearing a beard restraint. This has the potential to affect 54 residents out of 55 residents who eat orally residing on 2 South unit and to affect 44 out of 58 residents who eat orally residing on the 1 North unit at the time of the survey.The findings included:1) Record review of the Refrigerator and Freezer Temperature Monitoring Policy and Procedure (no written date) documented the following: Policy: The dietary department will maintain proper temperature control for all refrigerators and freezers used for food storage to ensure food safety and regulatory compliance; Procedure: Dietary staff will maintain manual thermometer to verify accuracy of the unit temperature when needed; Temperatures will be checked and recorded daily on the refrigerator temperature log; Acceptable temperature ranges are: Refrigerators: 36…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the refrigerators in the 2 South Unit Floor Pantry and 1 North Unit Floor Pantry used to store resident's food were working properly. This has the potential to affect 54 residents out of 55 residents who eat orally residing on 2 South unit and to affect 44 out of 58 residents who eat orally residing on the 1 North unit at the time of the survey.The findings included:Record review of the Refrigerator and Freezer Temperature Monitoring Policy and Procedure (no written date) documented the following: Policy: The dietary department will maintain proper temperature control for all refrigerators and freezers used for food storage to ensure food safety and regulatory compliance; Procedure: Dietary staff will maintain manual thermometer to verify accuracy of the unit temperature when needed; Temperatures will be checked and recorded daily on the refrigerator temperature log; Acceptable temperature ranges are: Refrigerators: 36 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and if the temperature falls…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accidents hazards in four (Room # 231, room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) out of fifty nine rooms on the second floor and for two (Resident #10 and Resident #153) out of thirty five sampled residents; as evidenced by 1) Personal hygiene products and medication found in residents' room unsecured 2) Resident #153 observed lying in bed with bilateral siderails upright with only left side rail padded. 2) Scissors observed on the table near Resident #10's bed and 3) A can of bug spray observed on the back shelf behind Resident #10's bed. There were 225 residents residing at the facility during the time of the survey. The findings include:During initial screening observation on 03/16/2026 starting at 8:00 AM the following was observed: room [ROOM NUMBER]- a bottle of bacterial mouth wash, blue in color on the overbed table room [ROOM NUMBER]-Three (3) full vials of Medication,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was delivered as prescribed for two residents (Resident #5 and Resident #211) with tracheostomies out of 11 residents receiving oxygen therapy. As evidenced by Resident #5 and Resident # 211 oxygen concentrator flow rates were not set at the prescribed rate. The findings include. Resident #5On 03/16/2026 at 8:22 AM Resident #5 was observed in bed with eyes closed and oxygen (02) running at three liters per minute (lpm) via tracheostomy.Observations on 03/17/2026 at 10:25 AM and 03/18/2026 at 8:14 AM revealed Resident #5 in bed awake with 02 running at four lpm via tracheostomy.Review of Resident #5's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Clinical diagnoses included but not limited to: Malfunction of Tracheostomy Stoma, Pneumonia due to other specified bacteria and Acute Pulmonary Edema.Review of the Physician's Orders Sheet for March 2026 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility's quality assurance and assessment committee failed to demonstrate an effective plan of action was implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practice for F812- Food Procurement. Store/Prepare/Serve Sanitary. F867- QAPI/QAA Improvement Activities. F908- Essential Equipment, Safe Operating Condition. These repeated deficient practices have the potential to affect any of the 225 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification conducted on August 19, 2024, through August 22, 2024, the facility. was cited F812- Food Procurement, Store/Prepare/Serve Sanitary as the facility failed to ensure food was prepared under sanitary conditions. F908- Essential Equipment, Safe Operating Condition was cited as the facility failed to ensure a convection oven and stove used to prepare food for residents were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations records reviewed and interviews, the facility's staff failed to address respiratory emergencies in a timely manner for two (Resident # 5 and Resident #6) out of three residents sampled residents; as evidenced by Resident #5 and Resident # 6 were noted in respiratory distress and the nurses failed to implement interventions in a timely manner. The findings included: On 01/23/2025 at 08:03 AM, Resident #6 was observed slumped in bed in distress; loud gurgling sounds noted, coughing and drooling; the resident shaking his head from side to side with facial grimacing indicating he is not feeling well, when asked if he had pain he nodded his head indicating yes. The oxygen was at 4 Liters Per Minute (LPM), tube feeding was infusing at infusing at 75 ml/hr. The nurse was called to the room. Staff A, RN entered the room to assist the resident and left the room to get Tylenol for the resident. came to the room put on gloves, was not wearing a gown and was not wearing a mask and speaking very close…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, reviews and interviews, the facility's staff failed to notify Resident #3's family /representative and physician of a change in condition for one out of three residents sampled as evidenced by Resident #3 who is at high risk for aspiration was observed vomiting and displaying signs of respiratory distress and on that specific date the facility staff did not notify the physician and the family of the changes in her condition. There were two hundred and ten residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include. On 01/22/2025 at 8:44 AM Resident #3 was observed in bed the bed head was slightly elevated, her eyes were closed; audible gurgling breathing sounds also known as Rhonchi were noted, oxygen via nasal cannula was flowing at 2 Liters Per Minute (LPM), dark beige thick vomit was draining from Resident # 3's mouth, a large white towel was observed tucked under her chin and draped across her chest absorbing the vomit; Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to prevent aspiration for one (Resident #3) out of three residents with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube at risk for aspiration as evidenced by Resident # 3 was observed with vomit draining from her mouth and the Registered Nurses failed to implement interventions in a timely manner; and failed to implement interventions to prevent PEG tube dislodgement for two (Resident #6 and Resident # 7) out of three residents sampled as evidenced by Resident #6 was noted with his unsecured PEG tube line resting above his hand and Resident #7's tube feeding line was observed wrapped around the privacy curtain that was wrapped around the metal pole that had the feeding infusing and hanging loosely on the inner section of the wheelchair's wheel (Photo evidence). Both residents clinical diagnoses include Seizures. These risk factors increases the risk for dislodgement of the PEG tubes and affect the residents'…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, records reviewed and interviews, the facility failed to secure medications and ensure the resident (Resident #6) received all of the crushed medications mixed with water during medication administration observation for one out of one resident (Resident #6) as evidenced by, Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) left Resident #6's medications unattended and failed to ensure the resident received the full amount of each medication via PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy/also known as G-tube). There were 27 Residents residing in the facility with PEG tubes. Medication observation on 01/23/2025 at 08:09 AM, Staff A, RN was observed administering medications to Resident # 6 via PEG. Staff A, RN entered the resident's room with crushed medications Tylenol 325 milligrams (mg.) 2 tablets and Eliquis Oral Tablet 2.5 mg 1 tablet separately mixed with water in cups and. room to get the medications for the resident. Staff A, RN returned to the room with the medications (Tylenol 325 milligrams(mg) 1…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviewed during this survey's investigations it has been determined that the facility failed to demonstrate effective plan of actions were implemented to correct identified quality deficiencies in the problem area related to repeated deficient practices for F 761 Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals, F693 Tube Feeding Management and F867 QAPI-QAA Improvement Activities. These repeated deficiencies have the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The findings included: Record review of the facility's survey history revealed, during a recertification survey with exit dated 08/22/2024 the facility was cited: F 761 Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals, F693 Tube Feeding Management and F867 QAPI-QAA Improvement Activities and during this complaint survey with exit dated 01/24/2024 the facility was cited again for F761 Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals, F693 Tube Feeding Management and F867 QAPI-QAA Improvement Activities. Review of the Policy and procedures revealed; It is the policy of the facility to develop, Implement, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,850 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $24,850 — penalty dated 2025-04-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENTURA SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL