No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lotus Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

7950 Lake Underhill Road, Orlando, FL 32822 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 180 certified beds · (407) 658-2046 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (407) 658-2046 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Mar 20231 actual-harm citation$3,282 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (34% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $3,282 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-26)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
7975 Lake Underhill Rd · (407) 381-8441 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8000 Lake Underhill Rd · (407) 658-1045 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
201 S Chickasaw Trl · (407) 380-9971 · Call to confirm hours
Park
715 Capehart Dr · (407) 254-9160 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.6%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.4%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.2%8.6%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.5%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit15.2%9.1%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.292.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
61.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.59U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 61.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 169 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.7–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge61.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge46.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.5–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.55
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.35
RN hoursweekends
34.4%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 158.7 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-03)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-03)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's nursing staff failed to adhere to standards of professional practice to promote skin integrity, obtain and implement appropriate wound care orders, and apply treatments and dressings as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#61 & #30). The facility's failure to implement adequate preventative interventions and follow policies and procedures for skin and wound care resulted in actual harm for resident #61, preventable injuries during activities of daily living (ADLs) care and development of a skin infection. Findings: 1. Review of resident #61's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, hypertension, depression, anxiety, and insomnia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/23/23 revealed resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity during mealtime assistance for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for dining support, of a total sample of 14 residents, (#3, and #5). Findings: 1. Review of resident #3's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted from an acute care hospital on 6/14/25. Her diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), vascular dementia, and contracture of the right and left hands. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 5/18/25 revealed resident #3's Brief Interview for Mental Status was not obtained as she was rarely or never understood. Instead, a Staff Assessment for Mental Status was conducted, with memory impairment noted for both short- and long-term memory. The MDS assessment indicated resident #3 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making. Review of Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) Tasks documentation revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow its grievance process for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for grievances, of a total sample of 14 residents, (#12). Findings: Review of resident #12's medical record revealed she was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) and hemiparesis (one-sided weakness) following a stroke affecting her right dominant side, contracture of the right hand, congestive heart failure, and type 2 diabetes. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/11/25, revealed resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Review of the Grievance Log from March 2025 through 6/26/25 revealed two grievances were submitted by resident #12: The first was a grievance dated 5/08/25 concerning the demeanor of the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), including a delay in response to the call light, and failure to identify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2) therapy was administered as per physician orders for 1 resident reviewed for oxygen, of a total sample of 7 residents, (#5). Findings: Resident #5, a 75- year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included sequelae of cerebral infarction (stroke complications), major depressive disorder, and chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. The assessment also revealed resident #5 received oxygen. The resident's care plan for oxygen therapy initiated on 3/01/21, indicated interventions which directed staff to, give medications as ordered by the physician, and, oxygen as ordered. Observations on 2/24/25 at 10:17 AM, at 12:31 PM, and at 12:45 PM, showed the resident sitting up in bed awake, alert, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented timely and appropriate plans of action to prevent repeat deficient practices related to pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) and Quality of Care. Findings: Review of the facility's survey history revealed repeated concerns for accuracy of Level I PASARRs, referral for Level II PASARRs, obtaining of non-pressure wound care orders and application of dressings per professional practice during the last annual recertification survey from March 2023 and again during the current recertification survey. On 10/02/24 at 4:00 PM, the Administrator stated he had been working at the facility since April 2024 and was unaware of the previous recertification survey deficiencies due to the change of ownership. He confirmed the facility did not currently have any Performance Improvement Plans at that time for the areas of concerns regarding PASARRs and Quality of Care. The Administrator conveyed the QAPI process should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) was correct upon admission, corrected after admission, and/or referred for Level II PASARR if indicated for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 54 residents, (#19, #7 and #30). Findings: 1. Resident #19 was originally admitted to this facility on 9/15/11 with admission diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, hypertension, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. The medical record revealed resident #19's Level I PASARR dated 8/10/09 indicated the resident had no mental illness nor did it include the diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease or dementia. The resident face sheet, revealed additional diagnoses of other seizures dated 4/12/21, major depressive disorder dated 2/21/14, and unspecified psychosis dated 2/21/14 for this resident. No other Level I PASARR was found in the medical record to include these significant diagnoses. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II was completed and failed to provide a complete PASARR Level I for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 54 residents, (#71 and #86). Findings A PASARR is a federally mandated evaluation process per the Nursing Home Reform Act . A Level I Pre-admission Screening is required for all applicants to Medicaid certified nursing facilities, regardless of payor. A Level II Evaluation and Determination must be completed prior to admission if a serious mental illness and /or intellectual disability or related condition is identified through the Level I screening. A Level II evaluation must also be completed when there is a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. (Retrieved on 10/07/24, from www.myflfamilies.com). 1. Review of resident #71's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include paranoid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order to provide treatment to a non-pressure wound and failed to apply non-pressure wound treatments per professional standards for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for non pressure wounds, of a total sample of 54 residents, (#19). Findings: On 9/30/24 at 1:36 PM, resident #19 was observed being assisted with his lunch. There was an undated bandage on the resident's left arm near his elbow. On 9/30/24 at 2:10 PM, the Memory Lane Unit Manager (UM) verified the resident had an undated bandage and confirmed nurses should always date a wound dressing to allow staff to know when the dressing was applied. Review of the medical record on 9/30/24 revealed no physician orders for a wound treatment to resident #19's left arm. Review of the medical record on 10/01/24, revealed a new physician order was placed at 1:13 PM, for treatment to the skin tear to resident #19's left elbow. The order indicated staff should cleanse with normal saline, pat dry, apply triple antibiotic ointment and cover with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide wound care to heel pressure ulcers/injuries per physician order and plan of care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/injuries, of a total sample of 54 residents, (#48). Findings: Review of the medical record indicated resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from acute care hospital with diagnoses including unstageable pressure wounds bilateral heels, dementia, muscle weakness, muscle wasting and atrophy. Unstageable pressure injuries are widely understood to be full-thickness pressure injuries in which the base is obscured by slough and/or eschar. Correct identification of these pressure injuries can be challenging among health care professionals and, although treatments vary .(Retrieved on 10/04/24 from www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The resident's five-day modification minimum data set assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required partial to moderate assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer oxygen (O2) therapy as ordered by the physician for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 54 residents, (#36, #152). Findings: 1. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. His diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy, acute and chronic respiratory failure, pneumonia, heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of the medical record for resident #36 revealed (AHCA) Agency for Health Care Administration Form 5000-3008 form dated 9/06/24 with Treatment Devices for O2 2 L [liters] NC [nasal cannula] and a physician order dated 9/07/24 that read, Respiratory: Oxygen 2 L via NC continuous. On 10/01/24 at 9:55 AM, and later at 2:10 PM, resident #36 was observed lying in bed wearing a NC attached to the O2 concentrator set at 3.5 liters per minute (LPM). Review of resident #36's care plan initiated on 9/24/24 for altered respiratory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow Contact Precautions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Transmission Based precautions, (#17), and failed to ensure use of a clean nasal canula for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen use, (#117), of a total sample of 54 residents. Findings: 1. On 10/01/24 at 2:10 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) I was observed entering resident #17's room without performing hand hygiene and without the required personal protective equipment (PPE) . CNA I was then observed as he placed a food item on this resident's tray and left the room, going straight back to food cart to continue passing meals, again without performing hand hygiene. A sign on resident #17's door indicated the resident was on Contact Isolation and anyone entering the room should wear a gown and gloves and should perform hand hygiene. A few minutes later in the hallway CNA I stated he donned a gown and gloves earlier when he entered the room but acknowledged during three separate other trips into resident #17's room he had not worn the required…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and treatment was provided according to professional standards of practice to meet the resident's need, and prevent the potential decline in the residents' physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well-being for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for change in condition of a total sample of 10 residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and resided on the Memory Care Unit. Her diagnoses included dementia with agitation, diabetes type II, cerebral infarction, mood affective disorder, major depressive disorder, and chronic kidney disease stage 2. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 11/09/23 revealed the resident's cognition was severely impaired, with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 out of 15. The assessment revealed the resident required substantial to maximal assistance for toileting hygiene, required partial to moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility's administration failed to effectively utilize its resources to implement processes to identify and address deficient practices, and failed to provide adequate oversight of staff to ensure the provision of necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable well-being for all residents. Findings: Review of the Facility Assessment updated on 2/24/23 revealed the facility was a 180-bed skilled nursing facility that could meet the needs of residents with common diseases and special conditions. The document indicated residents would receive care and services as determined by their needs and plans of care to include assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) care, prevention of falls, promotion of skin integrity, medication management and administration, and infection control and prevention. The Facility Assessment revealed the facility's intent to offer person-centered care such as build relationship with resident/get to know him/her;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to be treated with dignity and respect while receiving assistance with meals, (#53, #115 & #105), during personal care, (#61), and for all residents in and near a common area (West Wing Day Room), of a total sample of 66 residents. Findings: 1. Review of resident #53's medical record revealed she had dementia and moderate cognitive impairment. Her care plan for activities of daily living (ADLs) self-care performance deficit was initiated on 12/22/22, and read, The resident requires extensive assistance by staff to eat. On 3/01/23 at 1:00 PM, resident #53 was seated at a table in the middle of the [NAME] Wing Day Room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) O stood in front of resident #53 as she fed her. There were twelve additional residents seated in the room and the clear glass windows around the perimeter of the room allowed residents, staff, and visitors to visualize the activities in the room. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M stood outside the [NAME] Wing Day Room and observed CNA O's method…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopements for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for elopement, in a total sample of 66 residents, (#134). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #134 was admitted to the facility's secure Memory Care Unit on 3/01/22. Her diagnoses included Schizophrenia, Delusional Disorder, Hypertension, and Bipolar Disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS assessment revealed resident #134 was able to walk independently in her room, but she required supervision of one staff member to person for locomotion both on and off the Memory Care Unit. An Elopement Risk Evaluation dated 7/14/22 indicated resident #134 was at risk for elopement. Review of resident #134's medical record was being seen by a psychiatric provider and there were several notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services related to safe administration of controlled release medications, and accurate and/or timely acquisition of medication to meet the needs of 12 residents who received controlled release medications, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#8, #40, #49, #50, #69, #110, #112, #125, #126, #131, #141 & #146). Findings: 1. Review of resident #112's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and mini-strokes. Review of resident #112's active Order Summary Report revealed a physician order dated 2/05/23 for Isosorbide Mononitrate ER 24 hour 30 milligrams (mg) once daily for hypertension. Controlled release drugs which include those with the suffixes ER (Extended Release) and DR (Delayed Release) are designed to release medicine over an extended period of time to promote smooth release and a longer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to label stored foods in the walk-in refrigerator and defrost frozen foods under running water. Findings: Review of the facility menu revealed broccoli florets would be served at the lunch meal on 2/27/23. During an initial kitchen inspection on 2/27/23 at 6:16 AM, the facility's walk-in refrigerator was observed. There were two half-pans covered with foil paper. One of the pans had lima beans and the other pan contained cooked rice. The pans were not labeled with the date or the contents. The prep sink was filled with water and there were eight bags floating in the water. The water faucet was not running and the sink was not draining. At 6:34 AM, a Dietary Aide drained the prep sink, removed the bags of broccoli and placed them in a steam table pan. The bags of broccoli were warm to the touch and some of the bags of broccoli were full of water. The prep sink did not have a drain stop and the Dietary Aide explained she used one of the bags of broccoli as a drain stop. On 2/27/23 at 6:54 AM, the walk-in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview,and record review, the facility failed to determine if self-administration of medication was clinically appropriate and safe for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for choices and resident rights, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#132). Findings: Review of resident #132's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Anemia, Anxiety, and Mood Disorder. Review of the physician orders revealed resident #132 received two inhalation medications: Breo Ellipta Inhalation Aerosol Powder Breath Activated 200-225 micrograms per inhalation (mcg/INH), one puff every day, and Albuterol Sulfate HFA Aerosol Solution 108 (90 Base) mcg per actuation, two puffs every four hours as needed. On 2/27/23 at 9:36 AM, resident #132 was in bed with cough drops, one Breo Ellipta inhaler, and one Albuterol Sulfate inhaler to the left of her pillow. When asked about the inhalers, the resident explained she had COPD and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the right to refuse treatment related to a Do Not Resuscitate Order (DNRO), for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advance directives, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#44). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] after a hospital stay. His diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, seizures, hypertension, Alzheimer's disease, and protein-calorie malnutrition. The Florida Agency for Health Care Administration 5000-3008 Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form dated [DATE] revealed resident #44's primary diagnosis in the hospital was septic shock. Septic shock is the final and most severe stage of sepsis, which is the body's extreme reaction to an infection. The inflammation throughout the body can cause dangerously low blood pressure and is life-threatening (retrieved on [DATE] from www.my.clevelandclinic.org). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement its policies and procedures to prohibit Abuse and Neglect for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Abuse, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#61). Findings: Resident #61's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebrovascular disease, heart disease, depression, anxiety, and insomnia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date of 1/23/23 revealed resident #61 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The document noted she had no mood or behavioral issues and did not reject care that was necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and well-being. Resident #61 required limited assistance for bed mobility, and extensive assistance for transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS assessment showed the resident had no impairments in functional range of motion of her extremities. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge from the facility, out of a total sample of 66 residents, (#160). Findings: Review of resident #160's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA), Acute Subdural Hemorrhage, Seizures, Hypertension, and Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #160 had a physician's order to discharge home on 2/08/23 with Home Health Services, Home Health Aide, standard wheelchair, and Physical and Occupational Therapy. Review of a nursing progress note dated 2/09/22 at 10:20 AM indicated resident #160 was discharged home with his wife. The Short-Term Social Service Director's (SSD) progress note dated 2/14/23 at 8:30 AM documented resident #160's spouse had expressed that the resident was doing well at home. Review of the Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Record Review (PASARR) Level I was correct upon admission and corrected after admission for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR, out of a total sample of 66 residents, (#15 & #146). Findings: 1. Review of resident #15's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Psychosis, and Major Depressive Disorder. The resident's physician orders included Trazodone 50 milligrams (mg) by mouth (PO), give 0.5 tablet daily for depression, and Ziprasidone 20 mg PO two times a day for psychosis. Review of resident #15's PASARR Level I form dated 7/23/22 documented no diagnosis of Serious Mental Illness (SMI) or Intellectual Disability (ID). 2. Review of resident #146's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizoaffective Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. The resident's physician orders included Trazodone…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to refer a resident with identified mental illness for a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation and determination for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for PASARR, out of a total sample of 66 residents, (#38). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder and hypertension. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 1/11/23 revealed resident #38 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 7 which indicated he was severely cognitively impaired. The document indicated his active diagnoses included anxiety disorder, depression (other than bipolar) and psychotic disorder (other than schizophrenia). Review of resident #38's care plans revealed a behavior care plan initiated on 1/17/19 which indicated he was resistive to care related to schizophrenia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified sequelae of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, type 2 diabetes, essential hypertension, end stage renal disease, chronic embolism and thrombosis of other specified veins, seizures, major depressive disorder and insomnia. Review of the MDS admission assessment with assessment reference date of 1/17/23 revealed resident #89 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated he was cognitively intact. His active diagnoses included non-traumatic brain dysfunction, coronary artery disease, deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolus, hypertension, renal failure, diabetes mellitus, seizure disorder and depression. The MDS indicated resident #89 received oxygen therapy, intravenous medications and dialysis. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) associated with the admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated resident had conditions which required further evaluation. The identified areas were visual function,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a dietitian's recommendations to maintain sufficient fluid intake and adequate hydration for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for hydration, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#44). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE] after a hospital stay. His diagnoses included cerebrovascular disease, difficulty swallowing, Alzheimer's disease, protein-calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy. A gastrostomy tube or G-tube is a feeding tube that is inserted directly into the stomach through a surgical incision in the abdominal wall. A feeding tube is necessary if someone has difficulty swallowing as it allows the person to receive adequate nutrition, hydration, and medication (retrieved on 3/10/23 from www.my.clevelandclinic.org). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change in Status assessment with assessment reference date of 11/29/22 revealed resident #44 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring and documentation were implemented and conducted for the use of antipsychotic medications for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for behavioral/emotional monitoring, out of a total sample of 66 residents, (#157). Findings: Review of resident #157's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Seizures, Heart Failure, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Dementia, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented short-term and long-term memory problems, independence with cognitive skills for daily decision making, and no behavioral symptoms. The MDS assessment revealed resident #157 required extensive assistance of one to two staff for activities of daily living (ADL), used a wheel chair for mobility, and was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. He received antipsychotic medication on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration, of a total sample of 66 residents, (#5 & #112). The facility's medication error rate was 14.81% Findings: 1. Review of resident #112's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and mini-strokes. On 2/27/23 at 7:49 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M prepared to administer resident #112's eight scheduled morning medications. LPN M stood at the medication cart and crushed all the tablets which included one tablet Isosorbide Mononitrate Extended Release (ER) 30 milligrams (mg) and one tablet Chewable Aspirin 81 mg. He then mixed six crushed tablets, one whole capsule and the contents of one capsule into applesauce in a small plastic cup. On 2/27/23 at 7:57 AM, LPN M approached resident #112 to administer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices to prevent contamination during medication administration for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for medication administration (#112), and during wound care for 1 of 1 resident observed for wound care of 5 residents reviewed for skin conditions and pressure injuries (#44), of a total sample of 66 residents. Findings: 1. Review of resident #112's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atherosclerotic heart disease, hypertension, and mini-strokes. On 2/27/23 at 7:49 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M prepared to administer resident #112's scheduled morning medications. He did not perform hand hygiene prior to beginning the task although a bottle of alcohol-based hand sanitizer was on the medication cart. LPN M retrieved two capsules Gabapentin 100 milligrams (mg) and added them to the small plastic cup that contained other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents completed pneumococcal vaccine consent forms and received pneumococcal vaccines upon request, for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations, out of a total sample of 66 residents, (#120 & #137). Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #120 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. The medical record indicated pneumococcal vaccine consent was obtained by telephone consent from the resident's guardian on 12/28/21. The box was checked to note the facility received permission to administer the pneumococcal vaccine. Review of the immunization audit report and the Medication Administration Records did not reveal administration of the pneumococcal vaccine to resident #120. 2. Review of the medical record revealed resident #137 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a previous admission on [DATE]. Review of the electronic medical record's immunization section, and the immunization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy out of a total sample of 64 residents, (#77). Findings: Resident #77 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], then readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebral infarction, hypertensive heart failure, and vascular dementia. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date of 3/2/2021 revealed resident #77 was cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance of 2 staff for activities of daily living (ADL), and used oxygen for respiratory treatment. On 4/19/21 at 10:33 AM, resident #77 was lying in bed. The resident was not interviewable. He had oxygen tubing with a nasal cannula attached to an oxygen concentrator. The regulator was set at 4.5 liters of oxygen per minute (LPM). On 4/19/21 at 10:44 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN )E acknowledged the regulator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for falls (#52) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge to community (#157) out of a total sample of 64 residents. Findings: 1. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (www.cms.gov) dated November 14, 2012, read, . the MDS provides a comprehensive assessment of each resident's functional capabilities and helps the nursing home staff identify health problems and . helps provide the foundation upon which the resident's individual care plan is formulated Review of resident #52's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) Respiratory Failure, Pneumonia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) , Chronic Kidney Failure and Mood Disorder. Review of the facility's Incident Log revealed resident #52 had sustained falls on 12/09/20, 12/23/20 and 01/04/21. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care for 1 of 5 dependent residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) of a total sample of 64 residents (#131). Findings: Resident #131 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] then readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included Dementia, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Schizophrenia, and Epilepsy. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with assessment reference date of 03/31/21 revealed resident #131 had severely impaired cognition, and was totally dependent on 1 staff person for personal hygiene and bathing. On 04/18/21 at 3:40 PM, resident #131 was in bed, alert and watching television. His fingers nails to both hands were approximately 3/4 centimeters (cm) long with hardened, yellowish debris underneath. His main language was Spanish but he was able to answer minimal English questions. His right hand was able to move freely without limitation. His left hand was contracted. On 04/19/21 at 10:19 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$3,282 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $3,282 — penalty dated 2023-12-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENTURA SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.2-1.2 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.8-0.8 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.4-1.4 vs chain
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
RIO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/01/2023
AGRP 2011 TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
DEBORAH PHILIPSON 2011 FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
PHILIPSON FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
BENGIO, JACOBIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
GILLIAM, TRISHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
PARITZKY, JEREMIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
PHILIPSON, BENTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
PHILIPSON, GABRIELLEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
PHILIPSON, RAQUELIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
RICHARDS MITCHELL & CROSS PAOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
VENTURA SERVICES - FLORIDA, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023
HUSSAINI, NAJEEBIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-12.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$363K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 3%Other / private 29%

This home reported $363K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$296per resident / day
operating cost
$9,001per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$263per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105564. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next