Beachside Center For Rehabilitation And Nursing

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 323 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 265 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 239 beds and averages 165.5 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 74 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.53 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needed respiratory care, was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (Residents #96 and #154) of three residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Neither resident was receiving oxygen at the flow rate ordered by their physicians.The findings include: 1.On 02/03/26 at 9:40 AM, Resident #96 was observed wearing a nasal cannula (NC) that was connected to an oxygen concentrator. The concentrator was set at a flow rate of 2.5 liters/minute. The resident stated he had been receiving a flow rate of 2 liters per minute and that he did not manipulate the oxygen flow rate. On 02/03/26 at 12:07 PM, another observation was made of Resident #96 wearing his NC attached to an oxygen concentrator with a flow rate set at 2.5 liters/minute. A review of Resident #96's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to personal privacy and confidentiality of personal and medical records when facility forms and documents were left unsecured on the top of three (300 hall, 600 hall, and 700 hall) out of six medication carts and taped to the top of one (600 hall) of two nursing stations' counters where passersby could see them. The findings include: On 03/25/2024 at 8:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) F left a paper form with names of residents on the top of the 300 hall medication cart not secured for privacy and confidentiality. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 03/25/2024 at 8:42 AM during an interview with LPN F, she confirmed the list of names should not have been left on top of the medication cart unsecured. She turned the paper over and stated, I was only gone a few minutes. On 03/25/2024 at 11:58 AM, a green-colored paper, dated 03/25/2024, was observed taped to the countertop at the nurses' station on the 600 hall listing 27 resident names with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who required respiratory care received such care consistent with professional standards of practice for three (Residents #110, #146, and #150) of 25 residents who required oxygen therapy from a total sample of 50 residents. failed to ensure that physicians' orders for respiratory care were followed as prescribed, and when not followed, the reasons were recorded in the residents' medical record during that shift for three (Residents #110, #146, and #150) of 25 residents requiring oxygen therapy, from a total sample of 50 residents. The findings include: 1. On 3/25/2024 at 10:18 am, Resident #110 was observed lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula. Resident #110's oxygen concentrator was observed with a flow rate set at 2.5 L/min (liters per minute). On 3/25/2024 at 1:46 pm, another observation was made of Resident #110 lying in bed wearing a nasal cannula with the oxygen flow rate set at 2.5 L/min. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 3/28/2024 at 9:20 am, a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #26) of 50 residents in the total sample, was free from any physical restraints imposed for purposes other than the resident's medical condition. Inappropriate use of restraints could result in injury, skin breakdown, asphyxia, and/or strangulation among other things. The findings include: On 03/25/24 at 2:25 p.m., Resident #26 was observed in bed with bruises on her chest and the left side of her face. Her bed was in low position with floor mats on both sides of the bed. She also had a scoop mattress and half siderails that were padded. She had crossed her left leg over her right leg and was resting it on the right siderail. A bandage was observed on the resident's left shin, dated 3/24/24. An attempt to speak with the resident was unsuccessful due to confusion. A review of the resident's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a re-entry on 03/21/2024. Her diagnoses included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-28 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to 1) Use appropriate alternatives prior to installing a siderail. 2) Review the risks and benefits of siderails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation, and 3) Re-assess the resident for risk of entrapment from siderails for one (Resident #26) of a total of 50 residents sampled. The findings include: On 03/25/24 at 2:25 p.m., Resident #26 was observed in bed. Her bed was in low position with floor mats on both sides of the bed. She also had a scoop mattress and half siderails that were padded. She had crossed her left leg over her right leg and was resting it on the right siderail. An attempt to speak with the resident was unsuccessful due to confusion. In an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G on 03/25/24 at 2: 30 pm in Resident #26's room, LPN G stated the resident understood minimal English. She added that the resident spoke French, but at times the family stated even…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility records, the facility failed to maintain kitchen food distribution carts in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner for 3 of 5 food carts observed during lunch service to resident rooms. Failure to provide food services that meet standards of professional food service safety place residents at risk for possible illness. The findings include: On 9/8/23 at 12:10 pm, a tour of the facility was conducted during the lunch hour. Dietary staff were observed delivering beverages and meal trays to resident rooms on rolling food carts. On the 200 hallway, a two-tiered plastic rolling cart used to deliver lunch trays to that hall was observed to be stained and soiled. There were drips and splatters resembling food and beverage, and dark smudges, across the side of the cart's vertical surfaces. The four plastic legs were pitted, stained, soiled and scratched. The hydration cart on the 200 hallway was observed to have trash from opened straws and exposed/uncovered cup lids on the shelves, which were stained and soiled. The bottom shelf…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medical records were accurately documented in accordance with acceptable standards of practice for one (Resident #81) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care; and for one (Resident #91) of one resident reviewed for skin care, from a total of 23 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. A record review for Resident #81 revealed an admission date of 9/11/21, with diagnoses including cancer, pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma (diseases that block air flow and make it difficult to breath). A review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 points, indicating she was cognitively intact and able to independently make decisions. A review of Resident #81's physician's order dated 11/1/21 revealed BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure) AUTO order that read: At bedtime and as needed, ok to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to VENTURA SERVICES — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL